{"ok":true,"data":{"service":"platphorm-insights","version":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","totalTests":2415,"executableSuiteCount":7,"visibleFrameworkSuiteCount":14,"methodologyTestCount":185,"phase2DimensionCount":22,"phase2DimensionCounts":{"overall-quality":410,"performance":270,"core-web-vitals":270,"accessibility":775,"seo":370,"aeo":645,"geo":645,"security":315,"discovery":645,"route-compliance":410,"sitemap-feed":0,"structured-data":10,"mcp-api":265,"traceability":315,"i18n":0,"readability":0,"audience":0,"carbon-sustainability":270,"mobile-responsive":1045,"pwa":410,"content-utility":635,"trust-privacy":1500},"productTestStatuses":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"reportSections":[{"id":"performance-cwv","name":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","description":"Measured speed, responsiveness, visual stability, resource weight, and runtime performance evidence.","outputAudience":"human","suiteIds":["performance"],"testCount":270},{"id":"accessibility-inclusion","name":"Accessibility and Inclusion","description":"Automated accessibility signals, WCAG-linked findings, keyboard support, semantics, labels, and inclusive UX evidence.","outputAudience":"human","suiteIds":["accessibility"],"testCount":775},{"id":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","name":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","description":"Search, answer-engine, generative-engine, canonical, indexing, sitemap, and route discovery signals.","outputAudience":"crawler","suiteIds":["seo"],"testCount":370},{"id":"security-trust-privacy","name":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","description":"Transport security, response headers, public/protected boundaries, privacy disclosures, and policy hygiene.","outputAudience":"operator","suiteIds":["security","compliance"],"testCount":315},{"id":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","name":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","description":"AI-readable files, OpenAPI, MCP, agent policy, machine-readable docs, and read-only automation access.","outputAudience":"agent","suiteIds":["ai-readiness"],"testCount":265},{"id":"structured-data-feeds","name":"Structured Data, Feeds, and Discovery Artifacts","description":"JSON-LD, Open Graph, Twitter/X cards, RSS, sitemap, llms, humans, and machine-readable public artifacts.","outputAudience":"crawler","suiteIds":["structured-data"],"testCount":10},{"id":"best-practices-route-quality","name":"Best Practices and Route Quality","description":"Modern web standards, route integrity, reproducibility, deterministic grading, and operational resilience.","outputAudience":"operator","suiteIds":["best-practices","design","i18n","carbon"],"testCount":410}],"dimensions":[{"id":"overall-quality","name":"Overall Quality","testCount":410},{"id":"performance","name":"Performance","testCount":270},{"id":"core-web-vitals","name":"Core Web Vitals","testCount":270},{"id":"accessibility","name":"Accessibility","testCount":775},{"id":"seo","name":"Seo","testCount":370},{"id":"aeo","name":"Aeo","testCount":645},{"id":"geo","name":"Geo","testCount":645},{"id":"security","name":"Security","testCount":315},{"id":"discovery","name":"Discovery","testCount":645},{"id":"route-compliance","name":"Route Compliance","testCount":410},{"id":"sitemap-feed","name":"Sitemap Feed","testCount":0},{"id":"structured-data","name":"Structured Data","testCount":10},{"id":"mcp-api","name":"Mcp Api","testCount":265},{"id":"traceability","name":"Traceability","testCount":315},{"id":"i18n","name":"I18n","testCount":0},{"id":"readability","name":"Readability","testCount":0},{"id":"audience","name":"Audience","testCount":0},{"id":"carbon-sustainability","name":"Carbon Sustainability","testCount":270},{"id":"mobile-responsive","name":"Mobile Responsive","testCount":1045},{"id":"pwa","name":"Pwa","testCount":410},{"id":"content-utility","name":"Content Utility","testCount":635},{"id":"trust-privacy","name":"Trust Privacy","testCount":1500}],"suites":[{"id":"accessibility","name":"Accessibility","description":"WCAG compliance, screen reader support, and inclusive design","testCount":775,"weight":4536,"traceSpanName":"insights.suite.accessibility","reportSectionIds":["accessibility-inclusion"],"registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tests":["a11y-color-contrast","a11y-image-alt","a11y-button-name","a11y-link-name","a11y-form-labels","a11y-heading-order","a11y-document-title","a11y-html-lang","a11y-skip-link","a11y-focus-visible","a11y-keyboard-navigation","a11y-no-keyboard-trap","a11y-aria-valid","a11y-landmarks","a11y-video-captions","a11y-audio-description","a11y-touch-target","a11y-text-spacing","a11y-reflow","a11y-motion-reduced","a11y-error-identification","a11y-error-suggestion","a11y-autocomplete","a11y-status-messages","a11y-table-headers","ni-a11y-01","ni-a11y-02","ni-a11y-03","ni-a11y-04","ni-a11y-05","ni-a11y-06","ni-a11y-07","ni-a11y-08","ni-a11y-09","ni-a11y-10","ni-a11y-11","ni-a11y-12","ni-a11y-13","ni-a11y-14","ni-a11y-15","ni-a11y-16","ni-a11y-17","ni-a11y-18","ni-a11y-19","ni-a11y-20","ni-a11y-21","ni-a11y-22","ni-a11y-23","ni-a11y-24","ni-a11y-25","ni-a11y-26","ni-a11y-27","ni-a11y-28","ni-a11y-29","ni-a11y-30","ni-a11y-31","ni-a11y-32","ni-a11y-33","ni-a11y-34","ni-a11y-35","ni-a11y-36","ni-a11y-37","ni-a11y-38","ni-a11y-39","ni-a11y-40","ni-a11y-41","ni-a11y-42","ni-a11y-43","ni-a11y-44","ni-a11y-45","ni-a11y-46","ni-a11y-47","ni-a11y-48","ni-a11y-49","ni-a11y-50","ni-act-impl-01","ni-act-impl-02","ni-act-impl-03","ni-act-impl-04","ni-act-impl-05","ni-act-impl-06","ni-act-impl-07","ni-act-impl-08","ni-act-impl-09","ni-act-impl-10","ni-act-impl-11","ni-act-impl-12","ni-act-impl-13","ni-act-impl-14","ni-act-impl-15","ni-act-impl-16","ni-act-impl-17","ni-act-impl-18","ni-act-impl-19","ni-act-impl-20","ni-act-impl-21","ni-act-impl-22","ni-act-impl-23","ni-act-impl-24","ni-act-impl-25","ni-act-impl-26","ni-act-impl-27","ni-act-impl-28","ni-act-impl-29","ni-act-impl-30","ni-act-impl-31","ni-act-impl-32","ni-act-impl-33","ni-act-impl-34","ni-act-impl-35","ni-act-impl-36","ni-act-impl-37","ni-act-impl-38","ni-act-impl-39","ni-act-impl-40","ni-act-impl-41","ni-act-impl-42","ni-act-impl-43","ni-act-impl-44","ni-act-impl-45","ni-act-impl-46","ni-act-impl-47","ni-act-impl-48","ni-act-impl-49","ni-act-impl-50","ni-wcag-22-01","ni-wcag-22-02","ni-wcag-22-03","ni-wcag-22-04","ni-wcag-22-05","ni-wcag-22-06","ni-wcag-22-07","ni-wcag-22-08","ni-wcag-22-09","ni-wcag-22-10","ni-wcag-22-11","ni-wcag-22-12","ni-wcag-22-13","ni-wcag-22-14","ni-wcag-22-15","ni-wcag-22-16","ni-wcag-22-17","ni-wcag-22-18","ni-wcag-22-19","ni-wcag-22-20","ni-wcag-22-21","ni-wcag-22-22","ni-wcag-22-23","ni-wcag-22-24","ni-wcag-22-25","ni-wcag-22-26","ni-wcag-22-27","ni-wcag-22-28","ni-wcag-22-29","ni-wcag-22-30","ni-wcag-22-31","ni-wcag-22-32","ni-wcag-22-33","ni-wcag-22-34","ni-wcag-22-35","ni-wcag-22-36","ni-wcag-22-37","ni-wcag-22-38","ni-wcag-22-39","ni-wcag-22-40","ni-wcag-22-41","ni-wcag-22-42","ni-wcag-22-43","ni-wcag-22-44","ni-wcag-22-45","ni-wcag-22-46","ni-wcag-22-47","ni-wcag-22-48","ni-wcag-22-49","ni-wcag-22-50","ni-wcag-21-01","ni-wcag-21-02","ni-wcag-21-03","ni-wcag-21-04","ni-wcag-21-05","ni-wcag-21-06","ni-wcag-21-07","ni-wcag-21-08","ni-wcag-21-09","ni-wcag-21-10","ni-wcag-21-11","ni-wcag-21-12","ni-wcag-21-13","ni-wcag-21-14","ni-wcag-21-15","ni-wcag-21-16","ni-wcag-21-17","ni-wcag-21-18","ni-wcag-21-19","ni-wcag-21-20","ni-wcag-21-21","ni-wcag-21-22","ni-wcag-21-23","ni-wcag-21-24","ni-wcag-21-25","ni-wcag-21-26","ni-wcag-21-27","ni-wcag-21-28","ni-wcag-21-29","ni-wcag-21-30","ni-wcag-21-31","ni-wcag-21-32","ni-wcag-21-33","ni-wcag-21-34","ni-wcag-21-35","ni-wcag-21-36","ni-wcag-21-37","ni-wcag-21-38","ni-wcag-21-39","ni-wcag-21-40","ni-wcag-21-41","ni-wcag-21-42","ni-wcag-21-43","ni-wcag-21-44","ni-wcag-21-45","ni-wcag-21-46","ni-wcag-21-47","ni-wcag-21-48","ni-wcag-21-49","ni-wcag-21-50","ni-wcag-20-01","ni-wcag-20-02","ni-wcag-20-03","ni-wcag-20-04","ni-wcag-20-05","ni-wcag-20-06","ni-wcag-20-07","ni-wcag-20-08","ni-wcag-20-09","ni-wcag-20-10","ni-wcag-20-11","ni-wcag-20-12","ni-wcag-20-13","ni-wcag-20-14","ni-wcag-20-15","ni-wcag-20-16","ni-wcag-20-17","ni-wcag-20-18","ni-wcag-20-19","ni-wcag-20-20","ni-wcag-20-21","ni-wcag-20-22","ni-wcag-20-23","ni-wcag-20-24","ni-wcag-20-25","ni-wcag-20-26","ni-wcag-20-27","ni-wcag-20-28","ni-wcag-20-29","ni-wcag-20-30","ni-wcag-20-31","ni-wcag-20-32","ni-wcag-20-33","ni-wcag-20-34","ni-wcag-20-35","ni-wcag-20-36","ni-wcag-20-37","ni-wcag-20-38","ni-wcag-20-39","ni-wcag-20-40","ni-wcag-20-41","ni-wcag-20-42","ni-wcag-20-43","ni-wcag-20-44","ni-wcag-20-45","ni-wcag-20-46","ni-wcag-20-47","ni-wcag-20-48","ni-wcag-20-49","ni-wcag-20-50","ni-epub-a11y-11-01","ni-epub-a11y-11-02","ni-epub-a11y-11-03","ni-epub-a11y-11-04","ni-epub-a11y-11-05","ni-epub-a11y-11-06","ni-epub-a11y-11-07","ni-epub-a11y-11-08","ni-epub-a11y-11-09","ni-epub-a11y-11-10","ni-epub-a11y-11-11","ni-epub-a11y-11-12","ni-epub-a11y-11-13","ni-epub-a11y-11-14","ni-epub-a11y-11-15","ni-epub-a11y-11-16","ni-epub-a11y-11-17","ni-epub-a11y-11-18","ni-epub-a11y-11-19","ni-epub-a11y-11-20","ni-epub-a11y-11-21","ni-epub-a11y-11-22","ni-epub-a11y-11-23","ni-epub-a11y-11-24","ni-epub-a11y-11-25","ni-epub-a11y-11-26","ni-epub-a11y-11-27","ni-epub-a11y-11-28","ni-epub-a11y-11-29","ni-epub-a11y-11-30","ni-epub-a11y-11-31","ni-epub-a11y-11-32","ni-epub-a11y-11-33","ni-epub-a11y-11-34","ni-epub-a11y-11-35","ni-epub-a11y-11-36","ni-epub-a11y-11-37","ni-epub-a11y-11-38","ni-epub-a11y-11-39","ni-epub-a11y-11-40","ni-epub-a11y-11-41","ni-epub-a11y-11-42","ni-epub-a11y-11-43","ni-epub-a11y-11-44","ni-epub-a11y-11-45","ni-epub-a11y-11-46","ni-epub-a11y-11-47","ni-epub-a11y-11-48","ni-epub-a11y-11-49","ni-epub-a11y-11-50","ni-wai-master-01","ni-wai-master-02","ni-wai-master-03","ni-wai-master-04","ni-wai-master-05","ni-wai-master-06","ni-wai-master-07","ni-wai-master-08","ni-wai-master-09","ni-wai-master-10","ni-wai-master-11","ni-wai-master-12","ni-wai-master-13","ni-wai-master-14","ni-wai-master-15","ni-wai-master-16","ni-wai-master-17","ni-wai-master-18","ni-wai-master-19","ni-wai-master-20","ni-wai-master-21","ni-wai-master-22","ni-wai-master-23","ni-wai-master-24","ni-wai-master-25","ni-wai-master-26","ni-wai-master-27","ni-wai-master-28","ni-wai-master-29","ni-wai-master-30","ni-wai-master-31","ni-wai-master-32","ni-wai-master-33","ni-wai-master-34","ni-wai-master-35","ni-wai-master-36","ni-wai-master-37","ni-wai-master-38","ni-wai-master-39","ni-wai-master-40","ni-wai-master-41","ni-wai-master-42","ni-wai-master-43","ni-wai-master-44","ni-wai-master-45","ni-wai-master-46","ni-wai-master-47","ni-wai-master-48","ni-wai-master-49","ni-wai-master-50","ni-wai-aria-01","ni-wai-aria-02","ni-wai-aria-03","ni-wai-aria-04","ni-wai-aria-05","ni-wai-aria-06","ni-wai-aria-07","ni-wai-aria-08","ni-wai-aria-09","ni-wai-aria-10","ni-wai-aria-11","ni-wai-aria-12","ni-wai-aria-13","ni-wai-aria-14","ni-wai-aria-15","ni-wai-aria-16","ni-wai-aria-17","ni-wai-aria-18","ni-wai-aria-19","ni-wai-aria-20","ni-wai-aria-21","ni-wai-aria-22","ni-wai-aria-23","ni-wai-aria-24","ni-wai-aria-25","ni-wai-aria-26","ni-wai-aria-27","ni-wai-aria-28","ni-wai-aria-29","ni-wai-aria-30","ni-wai-aria-31","ni-wai-aria-32","ni-wai-aria-33","ni-wai-aria-34","ni-wai-aria-35","ni-wai-aria-36","ni-wai-aria-37","ni-wai-aria-38","ni-wai-aria-39","ni-wai-aria-40","ni-wai-aria-41","ni-wai-aria-42","ni-wai-aria-43","ni-wai-aria-44","ni-wai-aria-45","ni-wai-aria-46","ni-wai-aria-47","ni-wai-aria-48","ni-wai-aria-49","ni-wai-aria-50","ni-wai-aria-html-01","ni-wai-aria-html-02","ni-wai-aria-html-03","ni-wai-aria-html-04","ni-wai-aria-html-05","ni-wai-aria-html-06","ni-wai-aria-html-07","ni-wai-aria-html-08","ni-wai-aria-html-09","ni-wai-aria-html-10","ni-wai-aria-html-11","ni-wai-aria-html-12","ni-wai-aria-html-13","ni-wai-aria-html-14","ni-wai-aria-html-15","ni-wai-aria-html-16","ni-wai-aria-html-17","ni-wai-aria-html-18","ni-wai-aria-html-19","ni-wai-aria-html-20","ni-wai-aria-html-21","ni-wai-aria-html-22","ni-wai-aria-html-23","ni-wai-aria-html-24","ni-wai-aria-html-25","ni-wai-aria-html-26","ni-wai-aria-html-27","ni-wai-aria-html-28","ni-wai-aria-html-29","ni-wai-aria-html-30","ni-wai-aria-html-31","ni-wai-aria-html-32","ni-wai-aria-html-33","ni-wai-aria-html-34","ni-wai-aria-html-35","ni-wai-aria-html-36","ni-wai-aria-html-37","ni-wai-aria-html-38","ni-wai-aria-html-39","ni-wai-aria-html-40","ni-wai-aria-html-41","ni-wai-aria-html-42","ni-wai-aria-html-43","ni-wai-aria-html-44","ni-wai-aria-html-45","ni-wai-aria-html-46","ni-wai-aria-html-47","ni-wai-aria-html-48","ni-wai-aria-html-49","ni-wai-aria-html-50","ni-wai-accname-01","ni-wai-accname-02","ni-wai-accname-03","ni-wai-accname-04","ni-wai-accname-05","ni-wai-accname-06","ni-wai-accname-07","ni-wai-accname-08","ni-wai-accname-09","ni-wai-accname-10","ni-wai-accname-11","ni-wai-accname-12","ni-wai-accname-13","ni-wai-accname-14","ni-wai-accname-15","ni-wai-accname-16","ni-wai-accname-17","ni-wai-accname-18","ni-wai-accname-19","ni-wai-accname-20","ni-wai-accname-21","ni-wai-accname-22","ni-wai-accname-23","ni-wai-accname-24","ni-wai-accname-25","ni-wai-accname-26","ni-wai-accname-27","ni-wai-accname-28","ni-wai-accname-29","ni-wai-accname-30","ni-wai-accname-31","ni-wai-accname-32","ni-wai-accname-33","ni-wai-accname-34","ni-wai-accname-35","ni-wai-accname-36","ni-wai-accname-37","ni-wai-accname-38","ni-wai-accname-39","ni-wai-accname-40","ni-wai-accname-41","ni-wai-accname-42","ni-wai-accname-43","ni-wai-accname-44","ni-wai-accname-45","ni-wai-accname-46","ni-wai-accname-47","ni-wai-accname-48","ni-wai-accname-49","ni-wai-accname-50","ni-wai-apg-01","ni-wai-apg-02","ni-wai-apg-03","ni-wai-apg-04","ni-wai-apg-05","ni-wai-apg-06","ni-wai-apg-07","ni-wai-apg-08","ni-wai-apg-09","ni-wai-apg-10","ni-wai-apg-11","ni-wai-apg-12","ni-wai-apg-13","ni-wai-apg-14","ni-wai-apg-15","ni-wai-apg-16","ni-wai-apg-17","ni-wai-apg-18","ni-wai-apg-19","ni-wai-apg-20","ni-wai-apg-21","ni-wai-apg-22","ni-wai-apg-23","ni-wai-apg-24","ni-wai-apg-25","ni-wai-apg-26","ni-wai-apg-27","ni-wai-apg-28","ni-wai-apg-29","ni-wai-apg-30","ni-wai-apg-31","ni-wai-apg-32","ni-wai-apg-33","ni-wai-apg-34","ni-wai-apg-35","ni-wai-apg-36","ni-wai-apg-37","ni-wai-apg-38","ni-wai-apg-39","ni-wai-apg-40","ni-wai-apg-41","ni-wai-apg-42","ni-wai-apg-43","ni-wai-apg-44","ni-wai-apg-45","ni-wai-apg-46","ni-wai-apg-47","ni-wai-apg-48","ni-wai-apg-49","ni-wai-apg-50","ni-wai-atag-01","ni-wai-atag-02","ni-wai-atag-03","ni-wai-atag-04","ni-wai-atag-05","ni-wai-atag-06","ni-wai-atag-07","ni-wai-atag-08","ni-wai-atag-09","ni-wai-atag-10","ni-wai-atag-11","ni-wai-atag-12","ni-wai-atag-13","ni-wai-atag-14","ni-wai-atag-15","ni-wai-atag-16","ni-wai-atag-17","ni-wai-atag-18","ni-wai-atag-19","ni-wai-atag-20","ni-wai-atag-21","ni-wai-atag-22","ni-wai-atag-23","ni-wai-atag-24","ni-wai-atag-25","ni-wai-atag-26","ni-wai-atag-27","ni-wai-atag-28","ni-wai-atag-29","ni-wai-atag-30","ni-wai-atag-31","ni-wai-atag-32","ni-wai-atag-33","ni-wai-atag-34","ni-wai-atag-35","ni-wai-atag-36","ni-wai-atag-37","ni-wai-atag-38","ni-wai-atag-39","ni-wai-atag-40","ni-wai-atag-41","ni-wai-atag-42","ni-wai-atag-43","ni-wai-atag-44","ni-wai-atag-45","ni-wai-atag-46","ni-wai-atag-47","ni-wai-atag-48","ni-wai-atag-49","ni-wai-atag-50","ni-wai-uaag-01","ni-wai-uaag-02","ni-wai-uaag-03","ni-wai-uaag-04","ni-wai-uaag-05","ni-wai-uaag-06","ni-wai-uaag-07","ni-wai-uaag-08","ni-wai-uaag-09","ni-wai-uaag-10","ni-wai-uaag-11","ni-wai-uaag-12","ni-wai-uaag-13","ni-wai-uaag-14","ni-wai-uaag-15","ni-wai-uaag-16","ni-wai-uaag-17","ni-wai-uaag-18","ni-wai-uaag-19","ni-wai-uaag-20","ni-wai-uaag-21","ni-wai-uaag-22","ni-wai-uaag-23","ni-wai-uaag-24","ni-wai-uaag-25","ni-wai-uaag-26","ni-wai-uaag-27","ni-wai-uaag-28","ni-wai-uaag-29","ni-wai-uaag-30","ni-wai-uaag-31","ni-wai-uaag-32","ni-wai-uaag-33","ni-wai-uaag-34","ni-wai-uaag-35","ni-wai-uaag-36","ni-wai-uaag-37","ni-wai-uaag-38","ni-wai-uaag-39","ni-wai-uaag-40","ni-wai-uaag-41","ni-wai-uaag-42","ni-wai-uaag-43","ni-wai-uaag-44","ni-wai-uaag-45","ni-wai-uaag-46","ni-wai-uaag-47","ni-wai-uaag-48","ni-wai-uaag-49","ni-wai-uaag-50","ni-wai-wcag2ict-01","ni-wai-wcag2ict-02","ni-wai-wcag2ict-03","ni-wai-wcag2ict-04","ni-wai-wcag2ict-05","ni-wai-wcag2ict-06","ni-wai-wcag2ict-07","ni-wai-wcag2ict-08","ni-wai-wcag2ict-09","ni-wai-wcag2ict-10","ni-wai-wcag2ict-11","ni-wai-wcag2ict-12","ni-wai-wcag2ict-13","ni-wai-wcag2ict-14","ni-wai-wcag2ict-15","ni-wai-wcag2ict-16","ni-wai-wcag2ict-17","ni-wai-wcag2ict-18","ni-wai-wcag2ict-19","ni-wai-wcag2ict-20","ni-wai-wcag2ict-21","ni-wai-wcag2ict-22","ni-wai-wcag2ict-23","ni-wai-wcag2ict-24","ni-wai-wcag2ict-25","ni-wai-wcag2ict-26","ni-wai-wcag2ict-27","ni-wai-wcag2ict-28","ni-wai-wcag2ict-29","ni-wai-wcag2ict-30","ni-wai-wcag2ict-31","ni-wai-wcag2ict-32","ni-wai-wcag2ict-33","ni-wai-wcag2ict-34","ni-wai-wcag2ict-35","ni-wai-wcag2ict-36","ni-wai-wcag2ict-37","ni-wai-wcag2ict-38","ni-wai-wcag2ict-39","ni-wai-wcag2ict-40","ni-wai-wcag2ict-41","ni-wai-wcag2ict-42","ni-wai-wcag2ict-43","ni-wai-wcag2ict-44","ni-wai-wcag2ict-45","ni-wai-wcag2ict-46","ni-wai-wcag2ict-47","ni-wai-wcag2ict-48","ni-wai-wcag2ict-49","ni-wai-wcag2ict-50","ni-wai-wcag3-01","ni-wai-wcag3-02","ni-wai-wcag3-03","ni-wai-wcag3-04","ni-wai-wcag3-05","ni-wai-wcag3-06","ni-wai-wcag3-07","ni-wai-wcag3-08","ni-wai-wcag3-09","ni-wai-wcag3-10","ni-wai-wcag3-11","ni-wai-wcag3-12","ni-wai-wcag3-13","ni-wai-wcag3-14","ni-wai-wcag3-15","ni-wai-wcag3-16","ni-wai-wcag3-17","ni-wai-wcag3-18","ni-wai-wcag3-19","ni-wai-wcag3-20","ni-wai-wcag3-21","ni-wai-wcag3-22","ni-wai-wcag3-23","ni-wai-wcag3-24","ni-wai-wcag3-25","ni-wai-wcag3-26","ni-wai-wcag3-27","ni-wai-wcag3-28","ni-wai-wcag3-29","ni-wai-wcag3-30","ni-wai-wcag3-31","ni-wai-wcag3-32","ni-wai-wcag3-33","ni-wai-wcag3-34","ni-wai-wcag3-35","ni-wai-wcag3-36","ni-wai-wcag3-37","ni-wai-wcag3-38","ni-wai-wcag3-39","ni-wai-wcag3-40","ni-wai-wcag3-41","ni-wai-wcag3-42","ni-wai-wcag3-43","ni-wai-wcag3-44","ni-wai-wcag3-45","ni-wai-wcag3-46","ni-wai-wcag3-47","ni-wai-wcag3-48","ni-wai-wcag3-49","ni-wai-wcag3-50"]},{"id":"ai-readiness","name":"AI Readiness","description":"LLM discoverability, structured data, and machine readability","testCount":265,"weight":1528,"traceSpanName":"insights.suite.ai-readiness","reportSectionIds":["agent-api-mcp-readiness"],"registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tests":["ai-llms-txt","ai-llms-full-txt","ai-structured-data","ai-faq-schema","ai-howto-schema","ai-semantic-html","ai-heading-hierarchy","ai-content-chunking","ai-factoid-markup","ai-citation-ready","ai-api-documentation","ai-machine-readable","ai-entity-linking","ai-conversational-content","ai-summary-available","ni-llms-txt-01","ni-llms-txt-02","ni-llms-txt-03","ni-llms-txt-04","ni-llms-txt-05","ni-llms-txt-06","ni-llms-txt-07","ni-llms-txt-08","ni-llms-txt-09","ni-llms-txt-10","ni-llms-txt-11","ni-llms-txt-12","ni-llms-txt-13","ni-llms-txt-14","ni-llms-txt-15","ni-llms-txt-16","ni-llms-txt-17","ni-llms-txt-18","ni-llms-txt-19","ni-llms-txt-20","ni-llms-txt-21","ni-llms-txt-22","ni-llms-txt-23","ni-llms-txt-24","ni-llms-txt-25","ni-llms-txt-26","ni-llms-txt-27","ni-llms-txt-28","ni-llms-txt-29","ni-llms-txt-30","ni-llms-txt-31","ni-llms-txt-32","ni-llms-txt-33","ni-llms-txt-34","ni-llms-txt-35","ni-llms-txt-36","ni-llms-txt-37","ni-llms-txt-38","ni-llms-txt-39","ni-llms-txt-40","ni-llms-txt-41","ni-llms-txt-42","ni-llms-txt-43","ni-llms-txt-44","ni-llms-txt-45","ni-llms-txt-46","ni-llms-txt-47","ni-llms-txt-48","ni-llms-txt-49","ni-llms-txt-50","ni-llms-index-01","ni-llms-index-02","ni-llms-index-03","ni-llms-index-04","ni-llms-index-05","ni-llms-index-06","ni-llms-index-07","ni-llms-index-08","ni-llms-index-09","ni-llms-index-10","ni-llms-index-11","ni-llms-index-12","ni-llms-index-13","ni-llms-index-14","ni-llms-index-15","ni-llms-index-16","ni-llms-index-17","ni-llms-index-18","ni-llms-index-19","ni-llms-index-20","ni-llms-index-21","ni-llms-index-22","ni-llms-index-23","ni-llms-index-24","ni-llms-index-25","ni-llms-index-26","ni-llms-index-27","ni-llms-index-28","ni-llms-index-29","ni-llms-index-30","ni-llms-index-31","ni-llms-index-32","ni-llms-index-33","ni-llms-index-34","ni-llms-index-35","ni-llms-index-36","ni-llms-index-37","ni-llms-index-38","ni-llms-index-39","ni-llms-index-40","ni-llms-index-41","ni-llms-index-42","ni-llms-index-43","ni-llms-index-44","ni-llms-index-45","ni-llms-index-46","ni-llms-index-47","ni-llms-index-48","ni-llms-index-49","ni-llms-index-50","ni-mcp-tools-01","ni-mcp-tools-02","ni-mcp-tools-03","ni-mcp-tools-04","ni-mcp-tools-05","ni-mcp-tools-06","ni-mcp-tools-07","ni-mcp-tools-08","ni-mcp-tools-09","ni-mcp-tools-10","ni-mcp-tools-11","ni-mcp-tools-12","ni-mcp-tools-13","ni-mcp-tools-14","ni-mcp-tools-15","ni-mcp-tools-16","ni-mcp-tools-17","ni-mcp-tools-18","ni-mcp-tools-19","ni-mcp-tools-20","ni-mcp-tools-21","ni-mcp-tools-22","ni-mcp-tools-23","ni-mcp-tools-24","ni-mcp-tools-25","ni-mcp-tools-26","ni-mcp-tools-27","ni-mcp-tools-28","ni-mcp-tools-29","ni-mcp-tools-30","ni-mcp-tools-31","ni-mcp-tools-32","ni-mcp-tools-33","ni-mcp-tools-34","ni-mcp-tools-35","ni-mcp-tools-36","ni-mcp-tools-37","ni-mcp-tools-38","ni-mcp-tools-39","ni-mcp-tools-40","ni-mcp-tools-41","ni-mcp-tools-42","ni-mcp-tools-43","ni-mcp-tools-44","ni-mcp-tools-45","ni-mcp-tools-46","ni-mcp-tools-47","ni-mcp-tools-48","ni-mcp-tools-49","ni-mcp-tools-50","ni-schema-01","ni-schema-02","ni-schema-03","ni-schema-04","ni-schema-05","ni-schema-06","ni-schema-07","ni-schema-08","ni-schema-09","ni-schema-10","ni-schema-11","ni-schema-12","ni-schema-13","ni-schema-14","ni-schema-15","ni-schema-16","ni-schema-17","ni-schema-18","ni-schema-19","ni-schema-20","ni-schema-21","ni-schema-22","ni-schema-23","ni-schema-24","ni-schema-25","ni-schema-26","ni-schema-27","ni-schema-28","ni-schema-29","ni-schema-30","ni-schema-31","ni-schema-32","ni-schema-33","ni-schema-34","ni-schema-35","ni-schema-36","ni-schema-37","ni-schema-38","ni-schema-39","ni-schema-40","ni-schema-41","ni-schema-42","ni-schema-43","ni-schema-44","ni-schema-45","ni-schema-46","ni-schema-47","ni-schema-48","ni-schema-49","ni-schema-50","ni-agent-discovery-01","ni-agent-discovery-02","ni-agent-discovery-03","ni-agent-discovery-04","ni-agent-discovery-05","ni-agent-discovery-06","ni-agent-discovery-07","ni-agent-discovery-08","ni-agent-discovery-09","ni-agent-discovery-10","ni-agent-discovery-11","ni-agent-discovery-12","ni-agent-discovery-13","ni-agent-discovery-14","ni-agent-discovery-15","ni-agent-discovery-16","ni-agent-discovery-17","ni-agent-discovery-18","ni-agent-discovery-19","ni-agent-discovery-20","ni-agent-discovery-21","ni-agent-discovery-22","ni-agent-discovery-23","ni-agent-discovery-24","ni-agent-discovery-25","ni-agent-discovery-26","ni-agent-discovery-27","ni-agent-discovery-28","ni-agent-discovery-29","ni-agent-discovery-30","ni-agent-discovery-31","ni-agent-discovery-32","ni-agent-discovery-33","ni-agent-discovery-34","ni-agent-discovery-35","ni-agent-discovery-36","ni-agent-discovery-37","ni-agent-discovery-38","ni-agent-discovery-39","ni-agent-discovery-40","ni-agent-discovery-41","ni-agent-discovery-42","ni-agent-discovery-43","ni-agent-discovery-44","ni-agent-discovery-45","ni-agent-discovery-46","ni-agent-discovery-47","ni-agent-discovery-48","ni-agent-discovery-49","ni-agent-discovery-50"]},{"id":"best-practices","name":"Best Practices","description":"Modern web standards and code quality","testCount":410,"weight":2370,"traceSpanName":"insights.suite.best-practices","reportSectionIds":["best-practices-route-quality"],"registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tests":["bp-doctype","bp-charset","bp-viewport","bp-no-document-write","bp-no-console-logs","bp-valid-html","bp-no-deprecated-apis","bp-error-handling","bp-print-styles","bp-manifest","ni-w3c-01","ni-w3c-02","ni-w3c-03","ni-w3c-04","ni-w3c-05","ni-w3c-06","ni-w3c-07","ni-w3c-08","ni-w3c-09","ni-w3c-10","ni-w3c-11","ni-w3c-12","ni-w3c-13","ni-w3c-14","ni-w3c-15","ni-w3c-16","ni-w3c-17","ni-w3c-18","ni-w3c-19","ni-w3c-20","ni-w3c-21","ni-w3c-22","ni-w3c-23","ni-w3c-24","ni-w3c-25","ni-w3c-26","ni-w3c-27","ni-w3c-28","ni-w3c-29","ni-w3c-30","ni-w3c-31","ni-w3c-32","ni-w3c-33","ni-w3c-34","ni-w3c-35","ni-w3c-36","ni-w3c-37","ni-w3c-38","ni-w3c-39","ni-w3c-40","ni-w3c-41","ni-w3c-42","ni-w3c-43","ni-w3c-44","ni-w3c-45","ni-w3c-46","ni-w3c-47","ni-w3c-48","ni-w3c-49","ni-w3c-50","ni-humans-01","ni-humans-02","ni-humans-03","ni-humans-04","ni-humans-05","ni-humans-06","ni-humans-07","ni-humans-08","ni-humans-09","ni-humans-10","ni-humans-11","ni-humans-12","ni-humans-13","ni-humans-14","ni-humans-15","ni-humans-16","ni-humans-17","ni-humans-18","ni-humans-19","ni-humans-20","ni-humans-21","ni-humans-22","ni-humans-23","ni-humans-24","ni-humans-25","ni-humans-26","ni-humans-27","ni-humans-28","ni-humans-29","ni-humans-30","ni-humans-31","ni-humans-32","ni-humans-33","ni-humans-34","ni-humans-35","ni-humans-36","ni-humans-37","ni-humans-38","ni-humans-39","ni-humans-40","ni-humans-41","ni-humans-42","ni-humans-43","ni-humans-44","ni-humans-45","ni-humans-46","ni-humans-47","ni-humans-48","ni-humans-49","ni-humans-50","ni-quality-01","ni-quality-02","ni-quality-03","ni-quality-04","ni-quality-05","ni-quality-06","ni-quality-07","ni-quality-08","ni-quality-09","ni-quality-10","ni-quality-11","ni-quality-12","ni-quality-13","ni-quality-14","ni-quality-15","ni-quality-16","ni-quality-17","ni-quality-18","ni-quality-19","ni-quality-20","ni-quality-21","ni-quality-22","ni-quality-23","ni-quality-24","ni-quality-25","ni-quality-26","ni-quality-27","ni-quality-28","ni-quality-29","ni-quality-30","ni-quality-31","ni-quality-32","ni-quality-33","ni-quality-34","ni-quality-35","ni-quality-36","ni-quality-37","ni-quality-38","ni-quality-39","ni-quality-40","ni-quality-41","ni-quality-42","ni-quality-43","ni-quality-44","ni-quality-45","ni-quality-46","ni-quality-47","ni-quality-48","ni-quality-49","ni-quality-50","ni-attribution-01","ni-attribution-02","ni-attribution-03","ni-attribution-04","ni-attribution-05","ni-attribution-06","ni-attribution-07","ni-attribution-08","ni-attribution-09","ni-attribution-10","ni-attribution-11","ni-attribution-12","ni-attribution-13","ni-attribution-14","ni-attribution-15","ni-attribution-16","ni-attribution-17","ni-attribution-18","ni-attribution-19","ni-attribution-20","ni-attribution-21","ni-attribution-22","ni-attribution-23","ni-attribution-24","ni-attribution-25","ni-attribution-26","ni-attribution-27","ni-attribution-28","ni-attribution-29","ni-attribution-30","ni-attribution-31","ni-attribution-32","ni-attribution-33","ni-attribution-34","ni-attribution-35","ni-attribution-36","ni-attribution-37","ni-attribution-38","ni-attribution-39","ni-attribution-40","ni-attribution-41","ni-attribution-42","ni-attribution-43","ni-attribution-44","ni-attribution-45","ni-attribution-46","ni-attribution-47","ni-attribution-48","ni-attribution-49","ni-attribution-50","ni-sitespeed-cli-01","ni-sitespeed-cli-02","ni-sitespeed-cli-03","ni-sitespeed-cli-04","ni-sitespeed-cli-05","ni-sitespeed-cli-06","ni-sitespeed-cli-07","ni-sitespeed-cli-08","ni-sitespeed-cli-09","ni-sitespeed-cli-10","ni-sitespeed-cli-11","ni-sitespeed-cli-12","ni-sitespeed-cli-13","ni-sitespeed-cli-14","ni-sitespeed-cli-15","ni-sitespeed-cli-16","ni-sitespeed-cli-17","ni-sitespeed-cli-18","ni-sitespeed-cli-19","ni-sitespeed-cli-20","ni-sitespeed-cli-21","ni-sitespeed-cli-22","ni-sitespeed-cli-23","ni-sitespeed-cli-24","ni-sitespeed-cli-25","ni-sitespeed-cli-26","ni-sitespeed-cli-27","ni-sitespeed-cli-28","ni-sitespeed-cli-29","ni-sitespeed-cli-30","ni-sitespeed-cli-31","ni-sitespeed-cli-32","ni-sitespeed-cli-33","ni-sitespeed-cli-34","ni-sitespeed-cli-35","ni-sitespeed-cli-36","ni-sitespeed-cli-37","ni-sitespeed-cli-38","ni-sitespeed-cli-39","ni-sitespeed-cli-40","ni-sitespeed-cli-41","ni-sitespeed-cli-42","ni-sitespeed-cli-43","ni-sitespeed-cli-44","ni-sitespeed-cli-45","ni-sitespeed-cli-46","ni-sitespeed-cli-47","ni-sitespeed-cli-48","ni-sitespeed-cli-49","ni-sitespeed-cli-50","ni-sitespeed-cli-util-01","ni-sitespeed-cli-util-02","ni-sitespeed-cli-util-03","ni-sitespeed-cli-util-04","ni-sitespeed-cli-util-05","ni-sitespeed-cli-util-06","ni-sitespeed-cli-util-07","ni-sitespeed-cli-util-08","ni-sitespeed-cli-util-09","ni-sitespeed-cli-util-10","ni-sitespeed-cli-util-11","ni-sitespeed-cli-util-12","ni-sitespeed-cli-util-13","ni-sitespeed-cli-util-14","ni-sitespeed-cli-util-15","ni-sitespeed-cli-util-16","ni-sitespeed-cli-util-17","ni-sitespeed-cli-util-18","ni-sitespeed-cli-util-19","ni-sitespeed-cli-util-20","ni-sitespeed-cli-util-21","ni-sitespeed-cli-util-22","ni-sitespeed-cli-util-23","ni-sitespeed-cli-util-24","ni-sitespeed-cli-util-25","ni-sitespeed-cli-util-26","ni-sitespeed-cli-util-27","ni-sitespeed-cli-util-28","ni-sitespeed-cli-util-29","ni-sitespeed-cli-util-30","ni-sitespeed-cli-util-31","ni-sitespeed-cli-util-32","ni-sitespeed-cli-util-33","ni-sitespeed-cli-util-34","ni-sitespeed-cli-util-35","ni-sitespeed-cli-util-36","ni-sitespeed-cli-util-37","ni-sitespeed-cli-util-38","ni-sitespeed-cli-util-39","ni-sitespeed-cli-util-40","ni-sitespeed-cli-util-41","ni-sitespeed-cli-util-42","ni-sitespeed-cli-util-43","ni-sitespeed-cli-util-44","ni-sitespeed-cli-util-45","ni-sitespeed-cli-util-46","ni-sitespeed-cli-util-47","ni-sitespeed-cli-util-48","ni-sitespeed-cli-util-49","ni-sitespeed-cli-util-50","ni-sitespeed-reader-01","ni-sitespeed-reader-02","ni-sitespeed-reader-03","ni-sitespeed-reader-04","ni-sitespeed-reader-05","ni-sitespeed-reader-06","ni-sitespeed-reader-07","ni-sitespeed-reader-08","ni-sitespeed-reader-09","ni-sitespeed-reader-10","ni-sitespeed-reader-11","ni-sitespeed-reader-12","ni-sitespeed-reader-13","ni-sitespeed-reader-14","ni-sitespeed-reader-15","ni-sitespeed-reader-16","ni-sitespeed-reader-17","ni-sitespeed-reader-18","ni-sitespeed-reader-19","ni-sitespeed-reader-20","ni-sitespeed-reader-21","ni-sitespeed-reader-22","ni-sitespeed-reader-23","ni-sitespeed-reader-24","ni-sitespeed-reader-25","ni-sitespeed-reader-26","ni-sitespeed-reader-27","ni-sitespeed-reader-28","ni-sitespeed-reader-29","ni-sitespeed-reader-30","ni-sitespeed-reader-31","ni-sitespeed-reader-32","ni-sitespeed-reader-33","ni-sitespeed-reader-34","ni-sitespeed-reader-35","ni-sitespeed-reader-36","ni-sitespeed-reader-37","ni-sitespeed-reader-38","ni-sitespeed-reader-39","ni-sitespeed-reader-40","ni-sitespeed-reader-41","ni-sitespeed-reader-42","ni-sitespeed-reader-43","ni-sitespeed-reader-44","ni-sitespeed-reader-45","ni-sitespeed-reader-46","ni-sitespeed-reader-47","ni-sitespeed-reader-48","ni-sitespeed-reader-49","ni-sitespeed-reader-50","ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-01","ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-02","ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-03","ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-04","ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-05","ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-06","ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-07","ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-08","ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-09","ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-10","ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-11","ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-12","ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-13","ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-14","ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-15","ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-16","ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-17","ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-18","ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-19","ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-20","ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-21","ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-22","ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-23","ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-24","ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-25","ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-26","ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-27","ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-28","ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-29","ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-30","ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-31","ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-32","ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-33","ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-34","ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-35","ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-36","ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-37","ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-38","ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-39","ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-40","ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-41","ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-42","ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-43","ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-44","ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-45","ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-46","ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-47","ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-48","ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-49","ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-50"]},{"id":"performance","name":"Performance","description":"Core Web Vitals, loading speed, and resource optimization","testCount":270,"weight":1576,"traceSpanName":"insights.suite.performance","reportSectionIds":["performance-cwv"],"registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tests":["perf-lcp","perf-fid","perf-cls","perf-fcp","perf-ttfb","perf-tti","perf-tbt","perf-speed-index","perf-render-blocking","perf-unused-css","perf-unused-js","perf-image-optimization","perf-modern-image-formats","perf-lazy-loading","perf-text-compression","perf-http2","perf-caching","perf-preconnect","perf-font-display","perf-bundle-size","ni-speed-01","ni-speed-02","ni-speed-03","ni-speed-04","ni-speed-05","ni-speed-06","ni-speed-07","ni-speed-08","ni-speed-09","ni-speed-10","ni-speed-11","ni-speed-12","ni-speed-13","ni-speed-14","ni-speed-15","ni-speed-16","ni-speed-17","ni-speed-18","ni-speed-19","ni-speed-20","ni-speed-21","ni-speed-22","ni-speed-23","ni-speed-24","ni-speed-25","ni-speed-26","ni-speed-27","ni-speed-28","ni-speed-29","ni-speed-30","ni-speed-31","ni-speed-32","ni-speed-33","ni-speed-34","ni-speed-35","ni-speed-36","ni-speed-37","ni-speed-38","ni-speed-39","ni-speed-40","ni-speed-41","ni-speed-42","ni-speed-43","ni-speed-44","ni-speed-45","ni-speed-46","ni-speed-47","ni-speed-48","ni-speed-49","ni-speed-50","ni-resilience-01","ni-resilience-02","ni-resilience-03","ni-resilience-04","ni-resilience-05","ni-resilience-06","ni-resilience-07","ni-resilience-08","ni-resilience-09","ni-resilience-10","ni-resilience-11","ni-resilience-12","ni-resilience-13","ni-resilience-14","ni-resilience-15","ni-resilience-16","ni-resilience-17","ni-resilience-18","ni-resilience-19","ni-resilience-20","ni-resilience-21","ni-resilience-22","ni-resilience-23","ni-resilience-24","ni-resilience-25","ni-resilience-26","ni-resilience-27","ni-resilience-28","ni-resilience-29","ni-resilience-30","ni-resilience-31","ni-resilience-32","ni-resilience-33","ni-resilience-34","ni-resilience-35","ni-resilience-36","ni-resilience-37","ni-resilience-38","ni-resilience-39","ni-resilience-40","ni-resilience-41","ni-resilience-42","ni-resilience-43","ni-resilience-44","ni-resilience-45","ni-resilience-46","ni-resilience-47","ni-resilience-48","ni-resilience-49","ni-resilience-50","ni-sitespeed-coach-01","ni-sitespeed-coach-02","ni-sitespeed-coach-03","ni-sitespeed-coach-04","ni-sitespeed-coach-05","ni-sitespeed-coach-06","ni-sitespeed-coach-07","ni-sitespeed-coach-08","ni-sitespeed-coach-09","ni-sitespeed-coach-10","ni-sitespeed-coach-11","ni-sitespeed-coach-12","ni-sitespeed-coach-13","ni-sitespeed-coach-14","ni-sitespeed-coach-15","ni-sitespeed-coach-16","ni-sitespeed-coach-17","ni-sitespeed-coach-18","ni-sitespeed-coach-19","ni-sitespeed-coach-20","ni-sitespeed-coach-21","ni-sitespeed-coach-22","ni-sitespeed-coach-23","ni-sitespeed-coach-24","ni-sitespeed-coach-25","ni-sitespeed-coach-26","ni-sitespeed-coach-27","ni-sitespeed-coach-28","ni-sitespeed-coach-29","ni-sitespeed-coach-30","ni-sitespeed-coach-31","ni-sitespeed-coach-32","ni-sitespeed-coach-33","ni-sitespeed-coach-34","ni-sitespeed-coach-35","ni-sitespeed-coach-36","ni-sitespeed-coach-37","ni-sitespeed-coach-38","ni-sitespeed-coach-39","ni-sitespeed-coach-40","ni-sitespeed-coach-41","ni-sitespeed-coach-42","ni-sitespeed-coach-43","ni-sitespeed-coach-44","ni-sitespeed-coach-45","ni-sitespeed-coach-46","ni-sitespeed-coach-47","ni-sitespeed-coach-48","ni-sitespeed-coach-49","ni-sitespeed-coach-50","ni-sitespeed-graphite-01","ni-sitespeed-graphite-02","ni-sitespeed-graphite-03","ni-sitespeed-graphite-04","ni-sitespeed-graphite-05","ni-sitespeed-graphite-06","ni-sitespeed-graphite-07","ni-sitespeed-graphite-08","ni-sitespeed-graphite-09","ni-sitespeed-graphite-10","ni-sitespeed-graphite-11","ni-sitespeed-graphite-12","ni-sitespeed-graphite-13","ni-sitespeed-graphite-14","ni-sitespeed-graphite-15","ni-sitespeed-graphite-16","ni-sitespeed-graphite-17","ni-sitespeed-graphite-18","ni-sitespeed-graphite-19","ni-sitespeed-graphite-20","ni-sitespeed-graphite-21","ni-sitespeed-graphite-22","ni-sitespeed-graphite-23","ni-sitespeed-graphite-24","ni-sitespeed-graphite-25","ni-sitespeed-graphite-26","ni-sitespeed-graphite-27","ni-sitespeed-graphite-28","ni-sitespeed-graphite-29","ni-sitespeed-graphite-30","ni-sitespeed-graphite-31","ni-sitespeed-graphite-32","ni-sitespeed-graphite-33","ni-sitespeed-graphite-34","ni-sitespeed-graphite-35","ni-sitespeed-graphite-36","ni-sitespeed-graphite-37","ni-sitespeed-graphite-38","ni-sitespeed-graphite-39","ni-sitespeed-graphite-40","ni-sitespeed-graphite-41","ni-sitespeed-graphite-42","ni-sitespeed-graphite-43","ni-sitespeed-graphite-44","ni-sitespeed-graphite-45","ni-sitespeed-graphite-46","ni-sitespeed-graphite-47","ni-sitespeed-graphite-48","ni-sitespeed-graphite-49","ni-sitespeed-graphite-50","ni-sitespeed-budget-01","ni-sitespeed-budget-02","ni-sitespeed-budget-03","ni-sitespeed-budget-04","ni-sitespeed-budget-05","ni-sitespeed-budget-06","ni-sitespeed-budget-07","ni-sitespeed-budget-08","ni-sitespeed-budget-09","ni-sitespeed-budget-10","ni-sitespeed-budget-11","ni-sitespeed-budget-12","ni-sitespeed-budget-13","ni-sitespeed-budget-14","ni-sitespeed-budget-15","ni-sitespeed-budget-16","ni-sitespeed-budget-17","ni-sitespeed-budget-18","ni-sitespeed-budget-19","ni-sitespeed-budget-20","ni-sitespeed-budget-21","ni-sitespeed-budget-22","ni-sitespeed-budget-23","ni-sitespeed-budget-24","ni-sitespeed-budget-25","ni-sitespeed-budget-26","ni-sitespeed-budget-27","ni-sitespeed-budget-28","ni-sitespeed-budget-29","ni-sitespeed-budget-30","ni-sitespeed-budget-31","ni-sitespeed-budget-32","ni-sitespeed-budget-33","ni-sitespeed-budget-34","ni-sitespeed-budget-35","ni-sitespeed-budget-36","ni-sitespeed-budget-37","ni-sitespeed-budget-38","ni-sitespeed-budget-39","ni-sitespeed-budget-40","ni-sitespeed-budget-41","ni-sitespeed-budget-42","ni-sitespeed-budget-43","ni-sitespeed-budget-44","ni-sitespeed-budget-45","ni-sitespeed-budget-46","ni-sitespeed-budget-47","ni-sitespeed-budget-48","ni-sitespeed-budget-49","ni-sitespeed-budget-50"]},{"id":"security","name":"Security","description":"HTTPS, headers, and vulnerability prevention","testCount":315,"weight":1838,"traceSpanName":"insights.suite.security","reportSectionIds":["security-trust-privacy"],"registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tests":["sec-https","sec-hsts","sec-csp","sec-x-frame-options","sec-x-content-type","sec-referrer-policy","sec-permissions-policy","sec-no-mixed-content","sec-subresource-integrity","sec-cookie-secure","sec-no-inline-scripts","sec-form-action","sec-cors","sec-server-info","sec-sql-injection","ni-api-01","ni-api-02","ni-api-03","ni-api-04","ni-api-05","ni-api-06","ni-api-07","ni-api-08","ni-api-09","ni-api-10","ni-api-11","ni-api-12","ni-api-13","ni-api-14","ni-api-15","ni-api-16","ni-api-17","ni-api-18","ni-api-19","ni-api-20","ni-api-21","ni-api-22","ni-api-23","ni-api-24","ni-api-25","ni-api-26","ni-api-27","ni-api-28","ni-api-29","ni-api-30","ni-api-31","ni-api-32","ni-api-33","ni-api-34","ni-api-35","ni-api-36","ni-api-37","ni-api-38","ni-api-39","ni-api-40","ni-api-41","ni-api-42","ni-api-43","ni-api-44","ni-api-45","ni-api-46","ni-api-47","ni-api-48","ni-api-49","ni-api-50","ni-trace-01","ni-trace-02","ni-trace-03","ni-trace-04","ni-trace-05","ni-trace-06","ni-trace-07","ni-trace-08","ni-trace-09","ni-trace-10","ni-trace-11","ni-trace-12","ni-trace-13","ni-trace-14","ni-trace-15","ni-trace-16","ni-trace-17","ni-trace-18","ni-trace-19","ni-trace-20","ni-trace-21","ni-trace-22","ni-trace-23","ni-trace-24","ni-trace-25","ni-trace-26","ni-trace-27","ni-trace-28","ni-trace-29","ni-trace-30","ni-trace-31","ni-trace-32","ni-trace-33","ni-trace-34","ni-trace-35","ni-trace-36","ni-trace-37","ni-trace-38","ni-trace-39","ni-trace-40","ni-trace-41","ni-trace-42","ni-trace-43","ni-trace-44","ni-trace-45","ni-trace-46","ni-trace-47","ni-trace-48","ni-trace-49","ni-trace-50","ni-security-01","ni-security-02","ni-security-03","ni-security-04","ni-security-05","ni-security-06","ni-security-07","ni-security-08","ni-security-09","ni-security-10","ni-security-11","ni-security-12","ni-security-13","ni-security-14","ni-security-15","ni-security-16","ni-security-17","ni-security-18","ni-security-19","ni-security-20","ni-security-21","ni-security-22","ni-security-23","ni-security-24","ni-security-25","ni-security-26","ni-security-27","ni-security-28","ni-security-29","ni-security-30","ni-security-31","ni-security-32","ni-security-33","ni-security-34","ni-security-35","ni-security-36","ni-security-37","ni-security-38","ni-security-39","ni-security-40","ni-security-41","ni-security-42","ni-security-43","ni-security-44","ni-security-45","ni-security-46","ni-security-47","ni-security-48","ni-security-49","ni-security-50","ni-privacy-01","ni-privacy-02","ni-privacy-03","ni-privacy-04","ni-privacy-05","ni-privacy-06","ni-privacy-07","ni-privacy-08","ni-privacy-09","ni-privacy-10","ni-privacy-11","ni-privacy-12","ni-privacy-13","ni-privacy-14","ni-privacy-15","ni-privacy-16","ni-privacy-17","ni-privacy-18","ni-privacy-19","ni-privacy-20","ni-privacy-21","ni-privacy-22","ni-privacy-23","ni-privacy-24","ni-privacy-25","ni-privacy-26","ni-privacy-27","ni-privacy-28","ni-privacy-29","ni-privacy-30","ni-privacy-31","ni-privacy-32","ni-privacy-33","ni-privacy-34","ni-privacy-35","ni-privacy-36","ni-privacy-37","ni-privacy-38","ni-privacy-39","ni-privacy-40","ni-privacy-41","ni-privacy-42","ni-privacy-43","ni-privacy-44","ni-privacy-45","ni-privacy-46","ni-privacy-47","ni-privacy-48","ni-privacy-49","ni-privacy-50","ni-sitespeed-slack-01","ni-sitespeed-slack-02","ni-sitespeed-slack-03","ni-sitespeed-slack-04","ni-sitespeed-slack-05","ni-sitespeed-slack-06","ni-sitespeed-slack-07","ni-sitespeed-slack-08","ni-sitespeed-slack-09","ni-sitespeed-slack-10","ni-sitespeed-slack-11","ni-sitespeed-slack-12","ni-sitespeed-slack-13","ni-sitespeed-slack-14","ni-sitespeed-slack-15","ni-sitespeed-slack-16","ni-sitespeed-slack-17","ni-sitespeed-slack-18","ni-sitespeed-slack-19","ni-sitespeed-slack-20","ni-sitespeed-slack-21","ni-sitespeed-slack-22","ni-sitespeed-slack-23","ni-sitespeed-slack-24","ni-sitespeed-slack-25","ni-sitespeed-slack-26","ni-sitespeed-slack-27","ni-sitespeed-slack-28","ni-sitespeed-slack-29","ni-sitespeed-slack-30","ni-sitespeed-slack-31","ni-sitespeed-slack-32","ni-sitespeed-slack-33","ni-sitespeed-slack-34","ni-sitespeed-slack-35","ni-sitespeed-slack-36","ni-sitespeed-slack-37","ni-sitespeed-slack-38","ni-sitespeed-slack-39","ni-sitespeed-slack-40","ni-sitespeed-slack-41","ni-sitespeed-slack-42","ni-sitespeed-slack-43","ni-sitespeed-slack-44","ni-sitespeed-slack-45","ni-sitespeed-slack-46","ni-sitespeed-slack-47","ni-sitespeed-slack-48","ni-sitespeed-slack-49","ni-sitespeed-slack-50","ni-sitespeed-storage-01","ni-sitespeed-storage-02","ni-sitespeed-storage-03","ni-sitespeed-storage-04","ni-sitespeed-storage-05","ni-sitespeed-storage-06","ni-sitespeed-storage-07","ni-sitespeed-storage-08","ni-sitespeed-storage-09","ni-sitespeed-storage-10","ni-sitespeed-storage-11","ni-sitespeed-storage-12","ni-sitespeed-storage-13","ni-sitespeed-storage-14","ni-sitespeed-storage-15","ni-sitespeed-storage-16","ni-sitespeed-storage-17","ni-sitespeed-storage-18","ni-sitespeed-storage-19","ni-sitespeed-storage-20","ni-sitespeed-storage-21","ni-sitespeed-storage-22","ni-sitespeed-storage-23","ni-sitespeed-storage-24","ni-sitespeed-storage-25","ni-sitespeed-storage-26","ni-sitespeed-storage-27","ni-sitespeed-storage-28","ni-sitespeed-storage-29","ni-sitespeed-storage-30","ni-sitespeed-storage-31","ni-sitespeed-storage-32","ni-sitespeed-storage-33","ni-sitespeed-storage-34","ni-sitespeed-storage-35","ni-sitespeed-storage-36","ni-sitespeed-storage-37","ni-sitespeed-storage-38","ni-sitespeed-storage-39","ni-sitespeed-storage-40","ni-sitespeed-storage-41","ni-sitespeed-storage-42","ni-sitespeed-storage-43","ni-sitespeed-storage-44","ni-sitespeed-storage-45","ni-sitespeed-storage-46","ni-sitespeed-storage-47","ni-sitespeed-storage-48","ni-sitespeed-storage-49","ni-sitespeed-storage-50"]},{"id":"seo","name":"SEO","description":"Search engine optimization and discoverability","testCount":370,"weight":2160,"traceSpanName":"insights.suite.seo","reportSectionIds":["seo-aeo-geo-discovery"],"registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tests":["seo-meta-title","seo-meta-description","seo-canonical","seo-heading-h1","seo-open-graph","seo-twitter-cards","seo-structured-data","seo-sitemap","seo-robots-txt","seo-mobile-friendly","seo-https","seo-hreflang","seo-image-alt-seo","seo-url-structure","seo-internal-links","seo-page-speed","seo-content-length","seo-broken-links","seo-duplicate-content","seo-favicon","ni-i18n-01","ni-i18n-02","ni-i18n-03","ni-i18n-04","ni-i18n-05","ni-i18n-06","ni-i18n-07","ni-i18n-08","ni-i18n-09","ni-i18n-10","ni-i18n-11","ni-i18n-12","ni-i18n-13","ni-i18n-14","ni-i18n-15","ni-i18n-16","ni-i18n-17","ni-i18n-18","ni-i18n-19","ni-i18n-20","ni-i18n-21","ni-i18n-22","ni-i18n-23","ni-i18n-24","ni-i18n-25","ni-i18n-26","ni-i18n-27","ni-i18n-28","ni-i18n-29","ni-i18n-30","ni-i18n-31","ni-i18n-32","ni-i18n-33","ni-i18n-34","ni-i18n-35","ni-i18n-36","ni-i18n-37","ni-i18n-38","ni-i18n-39","ni-i18n-40","ni-i18n-41","ni-i18n-42","ni-i18n-43","ni-i18n-44","ni-i18n-45","ni-i18n-46","ni-i18n-47","ni-i18n-48","ni-i18n-49","ni-i18n-50","ni-sitemap-01","ni-sitemap-02","ni-sitemap-03","ni-sitemap-04","ni-sitemap-05","ni-sitemap-06","ni-sitemap-07","ni-sitemap-08","ni-sitemap-09","ni-sitemap-10","ni-sitemap-11","ni-sitemap-12","ni-sitemap-13","ni-sitemap-14","ni-sitemap-15","ni-sitemap-16","ni-sitemap-17","ni-sitemap-18","ni-sitemap-19","ni-sitemap-20","ni-sitemap-21","ni-sitemap-22","ni-sitemap-23","ni-sitemap-24","ni-sitemap-25","ni-sitemap-26","ni-sitemap-27","ni-sitemap-28","ni-sitemap-29","ni-sitemap-30","ni-sitemap-31","ni-sitemap-32","ni-sitemap-33","ni-sitemap-34","ni-sitemap-35","ni-sitemap-36","ni-sitemap-37","ni-sitemap-38","ni-sitemap-39","ni-sitemap-40","ni-sitemap-41","ni-sitemap-42","ni-sitemap-43","ni-sitemap-44","ni-sitemap-45","ni-sitemap-46","ni-sitemap-47","ni-sitemap-48","ni-sitemap-49","ni-sitemap-50","ni-sitemap-main-01","ni-sitemap-main-02","ni-sitemap-main-03","ni-sitemap-main-04","ni-sitemap-main-05","ni-sitemap-main-06","ni-sitemap-main-07","ni-sitemap-main-08","ni-sitemap-main-09","ni-sitemap-main-10","ni-sitemap-main-11","ni-sitemap-main-12","ni-sitemap-main-13","ni-sitemap-main-14","ni-sitemap-main-15","ni-sitemap-main-16","ni-sitemap-main-17","ni-sitemap-main-18","ni-sitemap-main-19","ni-sitemap-main-20","ni-sitemap-main-21","ni-sitemap-main-22","ni-sitemap-main-23","ni-sitemap-main-24","ni-sitemap-main-25","ni-sitemap-main-26","ni-sitemap-main-27","ni-sitemap-main-28","ni-sitemap-main-29","ni-sitemap-main-30","ni-sitemap-main-31","ni-sitemap-main-32","ni-sitemap-main-33","ni-sitemap-main-34","ni-sitemap-main-35","ni-sitemap-main-36","ni-sitemap-main-37","ni-sitemap-main-38","ni-sitemap-main-39","ni-sitemap-main-40","ni-sitemap-main-41","ni-sitemap-main-42","ni-sitemap-main-43","ni-sitemap-main-44","ni-sitemap-main-45","ni-sitemap-main-46","ni-sitemap-main-47","ni-sitemap-main-48","ni-sitemap-main-49","ni-sitemap-main-50","ni-route-01","ni-route-02","ni-route-03","ni-route-04","ni-route-05","ni-route-06","ni-route-07","ni-route-08","ni-route-09","ni-route-10","ni-route-11","ni-route-12","ni-route-13","ni-route-14","ni-route-15","ni-route-16","ni-route-17","ni-route-18","ni-route-19","ni-route-20","ni-route-21","ni-route-22","ni-route-23","ni-route-24","ni-route-25","ni-route-26","ni-route-27","ni-route-28","ni-route-29","ni-route-30","ni-route-31","ni-route-32","ni-route-33","ni-route-34","ni-route-35","ni-route-36","ni-route-37","ni-route-38","ni-route-39","ni-route-40","ni-route-41","ni-route-42","ni-route-43","ni-route-44","ni-route-45","ni-route-46","ni-route-47","ni-route-48","ni-route-49","ni-route-50","ni-sitespeed-domain-01","ni-sitespeed-domain-02","ni-sitespeed-domain-03","ni-sitespeed-domain-04","ni-sitespeed-domain-05","ni-sitespeed-domain-06","ni-sitespeed-domain-07","ni-sitespeed-domain-08","ni-sitespeed-domain-09","ni-sitespeed-domain-10","ni-sitespeed-domain-11","ni-sitespeed-domain-12","ni-sitespeed-domain-13","ni-sitespeed-domain-14","ni-sitespeed-domain-15","ni-sitespeed-domain-16","ni-sitespeed-domain-17","ni-sitespeed-domain-18","ni-sitespeed-domain-19","ni-sitespeed-domain-20","ni-sitespeed-domain-21","ni-sitespeed-domain-22","ni-sitespeed-domain-23","ni-sitespeed-domain-24","ni-sitespeed-domain-25","ni-sitespeed-domain-26","ni-sitespeed-domain-27","ni-sitespeed-domain-28","ni-sitespeed-domain-29","ni-sitespeed-domain-30","ni-sitespeed-domain-31","ni-sitespeed-domain-32","ni-sitespeed-domain-33","ni-sitespeed-domain-34","ni-sitespeed-domain-35","ni-sitespeed-domain-36","ni-sitespeed-domain-37","ni-sitespeed-domain-38","ni-sitespeed-domain-39","ni-sitespeed-domain-40","ni-sitespeed-domain-41","ni-sitespeed-domain-42","ni-sitespeed-domain-43","ni-sitespeed-domain-44","ni-sitespeed-domain-45","ni-sitespeed-domain-46","ni-sitespeed-domain-47","ni-sitespeed-domain-48","ni-sitespeed-domain-49","ni-sitespeed-domain-50","ni-sitespeed-path-01","ni-sitespeed-path-02","ni-sitespeed-path-03","ni-sitespeed-path-04","ni-sitespeed-path-05","ni-sitespeed-path-06","ni-sitespeed-path-07","ni-sitespeed-path-08","ni-sitespeed-path-09","ni-sitespeed-path-10","ni-sitespeed-path-11","ni-sitespeed-path-12","ni-sitespeed-path-13","ni-sitespeed-path-14","ni-sitespeed-path-15","ni-sitespeed-path-16","ni-sitespeed-path-17","ni-sitespeed-path-18","ni-sitespeed-path-19","ni-sitespeed-path-20","ni-sitespeed-path-21","ni-sitespeed-path-22","ni-sitespeed-path-23","ni-sitespeed-path-24","ni-sitespeed-path-25","ni-sitespeed-path-26","ni-sitespeed-path-27","ni-sitespeed-path-28","ni-sitespeed-path-29","ni-sitespeed-path-30","ni-sitespeed-path-31","ni-sitespeed-path-32","ni-sitespeed-path-33","ni-sitespeed-path-34","ni-sitespeed-path-35","ni-sitespeed-path-36","ni-sitespeed-path-37","ni-sitespeed-path-38","ni-sitespeed-path-39","ni-sitespeed-path-40","ni-sitespeed-path-41","ni-sitespeed-path-42","ni-sitespeed-path-43","ni-sitespeed-path-44","ni-sitespeed-path-45","ni-sitespeed-path-46","ni-sitespeed-path-47","ni-sitespeed-path-48","ni-sitespeed-path-49","ni-sitespeed-path-50","ni-sitespeed-result-url-01","ni-sitespeed-result-url-02","ni-sitespeed-result-url-03","ni-sitespeed-result-url-04","ni-sitespeed-result-url-05","ni-sitespeed-result-url-06","ni-sitespeed-result-url-07","ni-sitespeed-result-url-08","ni-sitespeed-result-url-09","ni-sitespeed-result-url-10","ni-sitespeed-result-url-11","ni-sitespeed-result-url-12","ni-sitespeed-result-url-13","ni-sitespeed-result-url-14","ni-sitespeed-result-url-15","ni-sitespeed-result-url-16","ni-sitespeed-result-url-17","ni-sitespeed-result-url-18","ni-sitespeed-result-url-19","ni-sitespeed-result-url-20","ni-sitespeed-result-url-21","ni-sitespeed-result-url-22","ni-sitespeed-result-url-23","ni-sitespeed-result-url-24","ni-sitespeed-result-url-25","ni-sitespeed-result-url-26","ni-sitespeed-result-url-27","ni-sitespeed-result-url-28","ni-sitespeed-result-url-29","ni-sitespeed-result-url-30","ni-sitespeed-result-url-31","ni-sitespeed-result-url-32","ni-sitespeed-result-url-33","ni-sitespeed-result-url-34","ni-sitespeed-result-url-35","ni-sitespeed-result-url-36","ni-sitespeed-result-url-37","ni-sitespeed-result-url-38","ni-sitespeed-result-url-39","ni-sitespeed-result-url-40","ni-sitespeed-result-url-41","ni-sitespeed-result-url-42","ni-sitespeed-result-url-43","ni-sitespeed-result-url-44","ni-sitespeed-result-url-45","ni-sitespeed-result-url-46","ni-sitespeed-result-url-47","ni-sitespeed-result-url-48","ni-sitespeed-result-url-49","ni-sitespeed-result-url-50"]},{"id":"structured-data","name":"Structured Data","description":"JSON-LD, XML feeds, and machine-readable content","testCount":10,"weight":55,"traceSpanName":"insights.suite.structured-data","reportSectionIds":["structured-data-feeds"],"registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tests":["sd-json-ld","sd-json-ld-valid","sd-rss-feed","sd-rss-valid","sd-sitemap","sd-sitemap-valid","sd-llms-txt","sd-llms-structured","sd-open-graph","sd-twitter-cards"]}],"methodologySuites":[{"id":"S01","code":"S01","name":"HTTP Status, Reachability & Crawlability Integrity","testCount":11,"weight":9,"priority":"critical"},{"id":"S02","code":"S02","name":"Redirect, Canonical & URL Precision","testCount":10,"weight":8,"priority":"critical"},{"id":"S03","code":"S03","name":"Indexing Control, Exclusion & Search Visibility","testCount":9,"weight":8,"priority":"critical"},{"id":"S04","code":"S04","name":"Sitemap, Inventory & Discoverability Graph","testCount":12,"weight":9,"priority":"high"},{"id":"S05","code":"S05","name":"Multilingual, Multiscript & Global Reach Precision","testCount":14,"weight":8,"priority":"critical"},{"id":"S06","code":"S06","name":"Accessibility & Inter-Dimensional Inclusivity","testCount":18,"weight":13,"priority":"critical"},{"id":"S07","code":"S07","name":"Semantic Meaning, Structured Data & Content Integrity","testCount":14,"weight":7,"priority":"high"},{"id":"S08","code":"S08","name":"AI Discovery, Agent Legibility & LLM Interface Surfaces","testCount":16,"weight":8,"priority":"critical"},{"id":"S09","code":"S09","name":"Human Attribution, Stewardship & Trust Surfaces","testCount":10,"weight":5,"priority":"high"},{"id":"S10","code":"S10","name":"Privacy, Data Use, Consent & User Agency","testCount":20,"weight":7,"priority":"critical"},{"id":"S11","code":"S11","name":"Licensing, Reuse, Attribution & Rights Clarity","testCount":14,"weight":4,"priority":"high"},{"id":"S12","code":"S12","name":"Performance, Resilience & Low-Resource Reality","testCount":10,"weight":2,"priority":"high"},{"id":"S13","code":"S13","name":"Security Headers, Trust Signals & Transport Security","testCount":13,"weight":7,"priority":"critical"},{"id":"S14","code":"S14","name":"UX, Interaction Design & Engagement","testCount":14,"weight":5,"priority":"high"}],"countReconciliation":{"homepageQualityTests":2415,"llmsQualityTests":2415,"mcpRegistryTests":2415,"openApiRegistryTests":2415,"visibleTwelveSuiteFramework":14,"note":"The homepage count is the canonical executable registry. The 12-suite framework is the visible methodology layer and maps onto those executable checks."},"tests":[{"id":"perf-lcp","testId":"perf-lcp","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)","description":"Measures loading performance. LCP should occur within 2.5 seconds of page load.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Performance and Core Web Vitals, records critical severity and high impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: core-web-vitals, loading, ux.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with measured evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 2500 ms"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Optimize images with next/image, preload critical resources, use efficient cache policy, remove render-blocking resources.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.perf-lcp","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["core-web-vitals","loading","ux"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"lighthouse --only-categories=performance --output=json | jq \".audits[\"largest-contentful-paint\"].numericValue\"","humanCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --view"}},{"id":"perf-fid","testId":"perf-fid","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"First Input Delay (FID)","description":"Measures interactivity. FID should be less than 100 milliseconds.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Performance and Core Web Vitals, records critical severity and high impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: core-web-vitals, interactivity, ux.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"First Input Delay (FID) appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with measured evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 100 ms"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Break up long tasks, optimize JavaScript execution, use web workers for heavy computation.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.perf-fid","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["core-web-vitals","interactivity","ux"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"lighthouse --only-categories=performance --output=json | jq \".audits[\"max-potential-fid\"].numericValue\"","humanCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --view"}},{"id":"perf-cls","testId":"perf-cls","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)","description":"Measures visual stability. CLS should be less than 0.1.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Performance and Core Web Vitals, records critical severity and high impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: core-web-vitals, visual-stability, ux.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with measured evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 0.1 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Set explicit dimensions on images/videos, reserve space for dynamic content, avoid inserting content above existing content.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.perf-cls","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["core-web-vitals","visual-stability","ux"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"lighthouse --only-categories=performance --output=json | jq \".audits[\"cumulative-layout-shift\"].numericValue\"","humanCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --view"}},{"id":"perf-fcp","testId":"perf-fcp","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"First Contentful Paint (FCP)","description":"Measures when the first content is painted. Should be under 1.8 seconds.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Performance and Core Web Vitals, records serious severity and high impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: loading, ux, perceived-performance.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"First Contentful Paint (FCP) appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 1800 ms"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Eliminate render-blocking resources, minify CSS, preload key requests, reduce server response time.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.perf-fcp","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["loading","ux","perceived-performance"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"lighthouse --only-categories=performance --output=json | jq \".audits[\"first-contentful-paint\"].numericValue\"","humanCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --view"}},{"id":"perf-ttfb","testId":"perf-ttfb","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Time to First Byte (TTFB)","description":"Measures server response time. Should be under 800ms.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Performance and Core Web Vitals, records serious severity and high impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: server, network, infrastructure.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Time to First Byte (TTFB) appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with measured evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 800 ms"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Use CDN, optimize server code, implement caching, upgrade hosting.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.perf-ttfb","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["server","network","infrastructure"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"curl -w \"%{time_starttransfer}\" -o /dev/null -s https://example.com","humanCommand":"curl -w \"TTFB: %{time_starttransfer}s\\n\" -o /dev/null -s https://example.com"}},{"id":"perf-tti","testId":"perf-tti","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Time to Interactive (TTI)","description":"Measures when the page becomes fully interactive. Should be under 3.8 seconds.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Performance and Core Web Vitals, records serious severity and high impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: interactivity, ux, javascript.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Time to Interactive (TTI) appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 3800 ms"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Minimize main thread work, reduce JavaScript execution time, minimize critical request depth.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.perf-tti","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["interactivity","ux","javascript"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"lighthouse --only-categories=performance --output=json | jq \".audits[\"interactive\"].numericValue\"","humanCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --view"}},{"id":"perf-tbt","testId":"perf-tbt","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Total Blocking Time (TBT)","description":"Sum of blocking time for long tasks. Should be under 200ms.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Performance and Core Web Vitals, records serious severity and high impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: blocking, javascript, main-thread.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Total Blocking Time (TBT) appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 200 ms"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Break up long tasks, defer non-critical JavaScript, use code splitting.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.perf-tbt","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["blocking","javascript","main-thread"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"lighthouse --only-categories=performance --output=json | jq \".audits[\"total-blocking-time\"].numericValue\"","humanCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --view"}},{"id":"perf-speed-index","testId":"perf-speed-index","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Speed Index","description":"Measures how quickly content is visually displayed. Should be under 3.4 seconds.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Performance and Core Web Vitals, records moderate severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: visual, perceived-performance.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Speed Index appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 3400 ms"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Minimize main thread work, reduce JavaScript execution time, ensure text remains visible during webfont load.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.perf-speed-index","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["visual","perceived-performance"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"lighthouse --only-categories=performance --output=json | jq \".audits[\"speed-index\"].numericValue\"","humanCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --view"}},{"id":"perf-render-blocking","testId":"perf-render-blocking","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Render-Blocking Resources","description":"Identifies resources that block first paint.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Performance and Core Web Vitals, records moderate severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: css, javascript, critical-path.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Render-Blocking Resources appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Inline critical CSS, defer non-critical CSS/JS, use async/defer attributes.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.perf-render-blocking","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["css","javascript","critical-path"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"lighthouse --only-categories=performance --output=json | jq \".audits[\"render-blocking-resources\"]\"","humanCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --view"}},{"id":"perf-unused-css","testId":"perf-unused-css","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Unused CSS","description":"Identifies CSS rules that are not used.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Performance and Core Web Vitals, records moderate severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: css, optimization, bundle-size.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Unused CSS appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 0 KB"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Use PurgeCSS or similar tool to remove unused CSS, implement CSS-in-JS, use CSS modules.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.perf-unused-css","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["css","optimization","bundle-size"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"lighthouse --only-categories=performance --output=json | jq \".audits[\"unused-css-rules\"]\"","humanCommand":"npx purgecss --css styles.css --content index.html"}},{"id":"perf-unused-js","testId":"perf-unused-js","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Unused JavaScript","description":"Identifies JavaScript that is not used.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Performance and Core Web Vitals, records moderate severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: javascript, optimization, bundle-size.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Unused JavaScript appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 0 KB"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Implement code splitting, use dynamic imports, tree-shake unused exports.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.perf-unused-js","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["javascript","optimization","bundle-size"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"lighthouse --only-categories=performance --output=json | jq \".audits[\"unused-javascript\"]\"","humanCommand":"npx webpack-bundle-analyzer stats.json"}},{"id":"perf-image-optimization","testId":"perf-image-optimization","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Image Optimization","description":"Checks if images are properly optimized.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Performance and Core Web Vitals, records moderate severity and high impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: images, optimization, format.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Image Optimization appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"high","remediation":"Use next/image, convert to WebP/AVIF, implement responsive images, lazy load below-fold images.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.perf-image-optimization","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["images","optimization","format"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"lighthouse --only-categories=performance --output=json | jq \".audits[\"uses-optimized-images\"]\"","humanCommand":"npx sharp-cli --input image.jpg --output optimized.webp --quality 80"}},{"id":"perf-modern-image-formats","testId":"perf-modern-image-formats","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Modern Image Formats","description":"Checks for WebP/AVIF usage.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Performance and Core Web Vitals, records moderate severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: images, format, compression.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Modern Image Formats appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Convert images to WebP or AVIF format, use picture element with fallbacks.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.perf-modern-image-formats","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["images","format","compression"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"lighthouse --only-categories=performance --output=json | jq \".audits[\"modern-image-formats\"]\"","humanCommand":"find . -name \"*.jpg\" -o -name \"*.png\" | head -20"}},{"id":"perf-lazy-loading","testId":"perf-lazy-loading","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Lazy Loading Images","description":"Checks if offscreen images use lazy loading.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Performance and Core Web Vitals, records moderate severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: images, lazy-loading, ux.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Lazy Loading Images appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Add loading=\"lazy\" to images below the fold, use Intersection Observer for custom lazy loading.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.perf-lazy-loading","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["images","lazy-loading","ux"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"document.querySelectorAll(\"img:not([loading])\").length","humanCommand":"grep -r \"loading=\" *.html | grep -v \"lazy\""}},{"id":"perf-text-compression","testId":"perf-text-compression","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Text Compression","description":"Checks if text resources are compressed (gzip/brotli).. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Performance and Core Web Vitals, records moderate severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: compression, server, network.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Text Compression appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with measured evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Enable gzip or Brotli compression on server, configure CDN compression settings.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.perf-text-compression","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["compression","server","network"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"curl -H \"Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate, br\" -I https://example.com | grep -i content-encoding","humanCommand":"curl -H \"Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate, br\" -I https://example.com | grep -i content-encoding"}},{"id":"perf-http2","testId":"perf-http2","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"HTTP/2 Protocol","description":"Checks if HTTP/2 or HTTP/3 is being used.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Performance and Core Web Vitals, records moderate severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: protocol, server, network.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"HTTP/2 Protocol appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with measured evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Upgrade server to support HTTP/2, use a CDN that supports HTTP/2/3.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.perf-http2","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["protocol","server","network"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"curl -I --http2 -s https://example.com | head -1","humanCommand":"curl -I --http2 -s https://example.com | head -1"}},{"id":"perf-caching","testId":"perf-caching","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Efficient Cache Policy","description":"Checks if static assets have proper cache headers.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Performance and Core Web Vitals, records moderate severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: caching, server, optimization.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Efficient Cache Policy appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Set Cache-Control headers with appropriate max-age, use content hashing for cache busting.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.perf-caching","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["caching","server","optimization"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"lighthouse --only-categories=performance --output=json | jq \".audits[\"uses-long-cache-ttl\"]\"","humanCommand":"curl -I https://example.com/static/main.js | grep -i cache-control"}},{"id":"perf-preconnect","testId":"perf-preconnect","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Preconnect to Origins","description":"Checks if preconnect is used for critical third-party origins.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Performance and Core Web Vitals, records minor severity and low impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: preload, network, optimization.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Preconnect to Origins appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with measured evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Add <link rel=\"preconnect\"> for critical third-party domains like fonts, analytics.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.perf-preconnect","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["preload","network","optimization"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"document.querySelectorAll(\"link[rel=preconnect]\").length","humanCommand":"grep -r \"rel=\\\"preconnect\\\"\" *.html"}},{"id":"perf-font-display","testId":"perf-font-display","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Font Display Strategy","description":"Checks if fonts use font-display: swap or optional.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Performance and Core Web Vitals, records minor severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: fonts, ux, loading.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Font Display Strategy appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"medium","remediation":"Add font-display: swap to @font-face rules, use next/font for automatic optimization.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.perf-font-display","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["fonts","ux","loading"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"lighthouse --only-categories=performance --output=json | jq \".audits[\"font-display\"]\"","humanCommand":"grep -r \"font-display\" *.css"}},{"id":"perf-bundle-size","testId":"perf-bundle-size","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"JavaScript Bundle Size","description":"Checks total JavaScript bundle size.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Performance and Core Web Vitals, records serious severity and high impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: javascript, bundle-size, optimization.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"JavaScript Bundle Size appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 200 KB"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Implement code splitting, remove unused dependencies, use lighter alternatives.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.perf-bundle-size","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["javascript","bundle-size","optimization"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"lighthouse --only-categories=performance --output=json | jq \".audits[\"total-byte-weight\"]\"","humanCommand":"npx bundlesize --max-size 200KB"}},{"id":"a11y-color-contrast","testId":"a11y-color-contrast","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Color Contrast","description":"Text must have sufficient contrast ratio (4.5:1 for normal text, 3:1 for large text).. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Accessibility and Inclusion, records critical severity and high impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: visual, color, readability.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Color Contrast appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 4.5 ratio"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Increase contrast between text and background colors. Use tools like WebAIM Contrast Checker.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.a11y-color-contrast","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["visual","color","readability"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"axe-core --rules color-contrast","humanCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules color-contrast"}},{"id":"a11y-image-alt","testId":"a11y-image-alt","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Image Alt Text","description":"All images must have alt attributes.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Accessibility and Inclusion, records critical severity and high impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: images, screen-reader, text-alternative.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Image Alt Text appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Add descriptive alt text to all images. Use empty alt=\"\" for decorative images.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.a11y-image-alt","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["images","screen-reader","text-alternative"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"document.querySelectorAll(\"img:not([alt])\").length === 0","humanCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules image-alt"}},{"id":"a11y-button-name","testId":"a11y-button-name","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Buttons Have Accessible Names","description":"All buttons must have discernible text.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Accessibility and Inclusion, records critical severity and high impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: buttons, screen-reader, interactive.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Buttons Have Accessible Names appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Add text content or aria-label to buttons. Icon-only buttons need aria-label.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.a11y-button-name","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["buttons","screen-reader","interactive"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"axe-core --rules button-name","humanCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules button-name"}},{"id":"a11y-link-name","testId":"a11y-link-name","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Links Have Accessible Names","description":"All links must have discernible text.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Accessibility and Inclusion, records critical severity and high impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: links, screen-reader, navigation.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Links Have Accessible Names appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Add descriptive text content to links. Avoid \"click here\" or \"read more\".","traceSpanName":"insights.test.a11y-link-name","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["links","screen-reader","navigation"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"axe-core --rules link-name","humanCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules link-name"}},{"id":"a11y-form-labels","testId":"a11y-form-labels","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Form Input Labels","description":"All form inputs must have associated labels.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Accessibility and Inclusion, records critical severity and high impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: forms, labels, input.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Form Input Labels appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Associate labels with inputs using for/id or wrap input in label element.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.a11y-form-labels","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["forms","labels","input"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"axe-core --rules label","humanCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules label"}},{"id":"a11y-heading-order","testId":"a11y-heading-order","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Heading Order","description":"Headings must be in a logical order (h1 -> h2 -> h3).. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Accessibility and Inclusion, records serious severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: headings, structure, navigation.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Heading Order appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"medium","remediation":"Ensure headings follow a logical hierarchy. Do not skip heading levels.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.a11y-heading-order","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["headings","structure","navigation"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"axe-core --rules heading-order","humanCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules heading-order"}},{"id":"a11y-document-title","testId":"a11y-document-title","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Document Has Title","description":"Page must have a descriptive title.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Accessibility and Inclusion, records serious severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: title, metadata, seo.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Document Has Title appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"medium","remediation":"Add a descriptive <title> element to the page head. Re-run the public website analysis and confirm the Accessibility and Inclusion report section shows updated evidence with a non-fabricated product status.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.a11y-document-title","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["title","metadata","seo"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"document.title.length > 0","humanCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules document-title"}},{"id":"a11y-html-lang","testId":"a11y-html-lang","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"HTML Lang Attribute","description":"HTML element must have a valid lang attribute.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Accessibility and Inclusion, records serious severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: language, i18n, screen-reader.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"HTML Lang Attribute appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"medium","remediation":"Add lang attribute to html element, e.g., <html lang=\"en\">.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.a11y-html-lang","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["language","i18n","screen-reader"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"document.documentElement.hasAttribute(\"lang\")","humanCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules html-has-lang"}},{"id":"a11y-skip-link","testId":"a11y-skip-link","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Skip Navigation Link","description":"Page should have a skip to main content link.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Accessibility and Inclusion, records moderate severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: navigation, keyboard, bypass.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Skip Navigation Link appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Add a visually hidden skip link at the top of the page that becomes visible on focus.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.a11y-skip-link","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["navigation","keyboard","bypass"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"document.querySelector(\"a[href='#main'], a[href='#content'], .skip-link\") !== null","humanCommand":"grep -r \"skip\" *.html | grep -i \"main\\|content\""}},{"id":"a11y-focus-visible","testId":"a11y-focus-visible","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Focus Indicator Visible","description":"Interactive elements must have visible focus indicators.. This manual-guided website-analysis check is reported under Accessibility and Inclusion, records serious severity and high impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: focus, keyboard, visual.","checkType":"manual_guided","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"manual_guided","publicReadout":"Focus Indicator Visible appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with manual guided evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Human/operator review evidence"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Ensure :focus styles are visible. Never use outline: none without replacement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.a11y-focus-visible","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["focus","keyboard","visual"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"axe-core --rules focus-order-semantics","humanCommand":"Tab through the page and verify all interactive elements show focus"}},{"id":"a11y-keyboard-navigation","testId":"a11y-keyboard-navigation","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Keyboard Navigation","description":"All interactive elements must be keyboard accessible.. This manual-guided website-analysis check is reported under Accessibility and Inclusion, records critical severity and high impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: keyboard, interactive, navigation.","checkType":"manual_guided","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"manual_guided","publicReadout":"Keyboard Navigation appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with manual guided evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Human/operator review evidence"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Use semantic HTML (button, a, input). Add tabindex=\"0\" for custom interactive elements.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.a11y-keyboard-navigation","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["keyboard","interactive","navigation"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"axe-core --rules keyboard","humanCommand":"Tab through entire page, verify all controls are reachable"}},{"id":"a11y-no-keyboard-trap","testId":"a11y-no-keyboard-trap","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"No Keyboard Trap","description":"Focus must not be trapped in any component.. This manual-guided website-analysis check is reported under Accessibility and Inclusion, records critical severity and high impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: keyboard, focus, modal.","checkType":"manual_guided","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"manual_guided","publicReadout":"No Keyboard Trap appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with manual guided evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Human/operator review evidence"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Ensure modals have proper focus management. Provide close button and Escape key handler.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.a11y-no-keyboard-trap","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["keyboard","focus","modal"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"Manual test required - tab through modals and widgets","humanCommand":"Open all modals/popups and verify you can Tab out of them"}},{"id":"a11y-aria-valid","testId":"a11y-aria-valid","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Valid ARIA Attributes","description":"ARIA attributes must be valid and used correctly.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Accessibility and Inclusion, records serious severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: aria, semantic, screen-reader.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Valid ARIA Attributes appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"medium","remediation":"Use valid ARIA roles and properties. Prefer semantic HTML over ARIA.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.a11y-aria-valid","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["aria","semantic","screen-reader"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"axe-core --rules aria-*","humanCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-valid-attr,aria-valid-attr-value"}},{"id":"a11y-landmarks","testId":"a11y-landmarks","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Page Landmarks","description":"Page should have proper landmark regions.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Accessibility and Inclusion, records moderate severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: landmarks, semantic, structure.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Page Landmarks appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Use semantic HTML5 elements: main, nav, header, footer, aside.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.a11y-landmarks","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["landmarks","semantic","structure"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"document.querySelectorAll(\"main, nav, header, footer, aside\").length >= 3","humanCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules landmark-*"}},{"id":"a11y-video-captions","testId":"a11y-video-captions","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Video Captions","description":"Videos must have captions.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Accessibility and Inclusion, records critical severity and high impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: video, captions, multimedia.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Video Captions appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Add <track kind=\"captions\"> to video elements or use captioned video hosting.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.a11y-video-captions","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["video","captions","multimedia"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"document.querySelectorAll(\"video:not(:has(track[kind=captions]))\").length === 0","humanCommand":"Check all videos for caption tracks"}},{"id":"a11y-audio-description","testId":"a11y-audio-description","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Audio Description","description":"Videos with important visual info should have audio description.. This manual-guided website-analysis check is reported under Accessibility and Inclusion, records moderate severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: video, audio-description, multimedia.","checkType":"manual_guided","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"manual_guided","publicReadout":"Audio Description appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with manual guided evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Human/operator review evidence"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Provide audio description track or extended audio description for videos.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.a11y-audio-description","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["video","audio-description","multimedia"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"Manual review required","humanCommand":"Review videos for visual content that needs audio description"}},{"id":"a11y-touch-target","testId":"a11y-touch-target","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Touch Target Size","description":"Interactive elements must have minimum 44x44px touch target.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Accessibility and Inclusion, records moderate severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: touch, mobile, interaction.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Touch Target Size appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 44 px"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Increase padding or min-width/height to ensure 44x44px touch targets.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.a11y-touch-target","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["touch","mobile","interaction"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"Check element dimensions >= 44x44","humanCommand":"Inspect interactive elements and verify touch target size"}},{"id":"a11y-text-spacing","testId":"a11y-text-spacing","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Text Spacing Adaptability","description":"Content should remain readable with increased text spacing.. This manual-guided website-analysis check is reported under Accessibility and Inclusion, records moderate severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: text, spacing, readability.","checkType":"manual_guided","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"manual_guided","publicReadout":"Text Spacing Adaptability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with manual guided evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Human/operator review evidence"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Use relative units for spacing. Avoid fixed heights that clip text.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.a11y-text-spacing","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["text","spacing","readability"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"Manual test with custom CSS","humanCommand":"Apply 1.5em line-height, 2em paragraph spacing, 0.12em letter spacing"}},{"id":"a11y-reflow","testId":"a11y-reflow","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Content Reflow","description":"Content should be viewable at 320px without horizontal scroll.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Accessibility and Inclusion, records moderate severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: responsive, mobile, viewport.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Content Reflow appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Use responsive design, avoid fixed widths, use relative units.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.a11y-reflow","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["responsive","mobile","viewport"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"Test viewport at 320px width","humanCommand":"Resize browser to 320px width and verify no horizontal scroll"}},{"id":"a11y-motion-reduced","testId":"a11y-motion-reduced","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Reduced Motion Support","description":"Animations should respect prefers-reduced-motion.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Accessibility and Inclusion, records moderate severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: motion, animation, vestibular.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Reduced Motion Support appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Wrap animations in @media (prefers-reduced-motion: no-preference).","traceSpanName":"insights.test.a11y-motion-reduced","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["motion","animation","vestibular"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"grep -r \"prefers-reduced-motion\" *.css","humanCommand":"Search CSS for @media (prefers-reduced-motion)"}},{"id":"a11y-error-identification","testId":"a11y-error-identification","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Error Identification","description":"Form errors must be clearly identified and described.. This manual-guided website-analysis check is reported under Accessibility and Inclusion, records serious severity and high impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: forms, errors, validation.","checkType":"manual_guided","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"manual_guided","publicReadout":"Error Identification appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with manual guided evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Human/operator review evidence"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Use aria-describedby to associate error messages with inputs.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.a11y-error-identification","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["forms","errors","validation"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"Check form error messages are associated with inputs","humanCommand":"Submit forms with invalid data and verify error messages"}},{"id":"a11y-error-suggestion","testId":"a11y-error-suggestion","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Error Suggestions","description":"Error messages should suggest corrections.. This manual-guided website-analysis check is reported under Accessibility and Inclusion, records moderate severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: forms, errors, ux.","checkType":"manual_guided","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"manual_guided","publicReadout":"Error Suggestions appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with manual guided evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Human/operator review evidence"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Provide specific, actionable error messages that explain how to fix issues.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.a11y-error-suggestion","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["forms","errors","ux"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"Review error message content","humanCommand":"Trigger validation errors and verify suggestions are provided"}},{"id":"a11y-autocomplete","testId":"a11y-autocomplete","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Input Autocomplete","description":"Form inputs should have appropriate autocomplete attributes.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Accessibility and Inclusion, records moderate severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: forms, autocomplete, input.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Input Autocomplete appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Add autocomplete attributes to inputs (name, email, tel, address, etc.).","traceSpanName":"insights.test.a11y-autocomplete","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["forms","autocomplete","input"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"document.querySelectorAll(\"input:not([autocomplete])\").length","humanCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules autocomplete-valid"}},{"id":"a11y-status-messages","testId":"a11y-status-messages","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Status Messages","description":"Status messages must be announced to screen readers.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Accessibility and Inclusion, records moderate severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: screen-reader, dynamic, aria.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Status Messages appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Use role=\"status\" or aria-live=\"polite\" for dynamic status updates.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.a11y-status-messages","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["screen-reader","dynamic","aria"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"document.querySelectorAll(\"[role=status], [role=alert], [aria-live]\").length > 0","humanCommand":"Trigger status updates and verify screen reader announcement"}},{"id":"a11y-table-headers","testId":"a11y-table-headers","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Table Headers","description":"Data tables must have proper header cells.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Accessibility and Inclusion, records serious severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: tables, headers, structure.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Table Headers appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"medium","remediation":"Use <th> for header cells, add scope attribute for complex tables.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.a11y-table-headers","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["tables","headers","structure"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"axe-core --rules th-has-data-cells,td-headers-attr","humanCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules th-has-data-cells"}},{"id":"seo-meta-title","testId":"seo-meta-title","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Meta Title","description":"Page has a unique, descriptive title (50-60 characters).. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery, records critical severity and high impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: meta, title, serp.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Meta Title appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 60 chars"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Add unique title 50-60 chars with primary keyword near the beginning.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.seo-meta-title","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["meta","title","serp"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"document.title","humanCommand":"curl -s https://example.com | grep -o \"<title>[^<]*</title>\""}},{"id":"seo-meta-description","testId":"seo-meta-description","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Meta Description","description":"Page has a compelling meta description (150-160 characters).. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery, records critical severity and high impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: meta, description, serp.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Meta Description appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 160 chars"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Add meta description 150-160 chars with call-to-action and keywords.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.seo-meta-description","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["meta","description","serp"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"document.querySelector(\"meta[name=description]\")?.content","humanCommand":"curl -s https://example.com | grep -o \"meta name=\\\"description\\\"[^>]*\""}},{"id":"seo-canonical","testId":"seo-canonical","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Canonical URL","description":"Page has a canonical URL defined.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery, records serious severity and high impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: canonical, duplicate-content, indexing.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Canonical URL appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Add <link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https://example.com/page\"> to prevent duplicate content.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.seo-canonical","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["canonical","duplicate-content","indexing"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"document.querySelector(\"link[rel=canonical]\")?.href","humanCommand":"curl -s https://example.com | grep -o \"rel=\\\"canonical\\\"[^>]*\""}},{"id":"seo-heading-h1","testId":"seo-heading-h1","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Single H1 Heading","description":"Page has exactly one H1 heading.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery, records serious severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: headings, structure, content.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Single H1 Heading appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"medium","remediation":"Ensure page has exactly one H1 tag with primary keyword.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.seo-heading-h1","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["headings","structure","content"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"document.querySelectorAll(\"h1\").length === 1","humanCommand":"curl -s https://example.com | grep -c \"<h1\""}},{"id":"seo-open-graph","testId":"seo-open-graph","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Open Graph Tags","description":"Page has Open Graph meta tags for social sharing.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery, records moderate severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: social, sharing, meta.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Open Graph Tags appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url meta tags.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.seo-open-graph","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["social","sharing","meta"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"document.querySelectorAll(\"meta[property^=\\\"og:\\\"]\").length >= 4","humanCommand":"curl -s https://example.com | grep -o \"property=\\\"og:[^\\\"]*\\\"\""}},{"id":"seo-twitter-cards","testId":"seo-twitter-cards","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Twitter Card Tags","description":"Page has Twitter Card meta tags.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery, records moderate severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: social, twitter, meta.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Twitter Card Tags appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Add twitter:card, twitter:title, twitter:description, twitter:image.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.seo-twitter-cards","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["social","twitter","meta"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"document.querySelectorAll(\"meta[name^=\\\"twitter:\\\"]\").length >= 3","humanCommand":"curl -s https://example.com | grep -o \"name=\\\"twitter:[^\\\"]*\\\"\""}},{"id":"seo-structured-data","testId":"seo-structured-data","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Structured Data (JSON-LD)","description":"Page has structured data for rich snippets.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery, records moderate severity and high impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: structured-data, rich-snippets, schema.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Structured Data (JSON-LD) appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"high","remediation":"Add JSON-LD structured data for Organization, WebPage, FAQPage, etc.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.seo-structured-data","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["structured-data","rich-snippets","schema"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"document.querySelectorAll(\"script[type=\\\"application/ld+json\\\"]\").length > 0","humanCommand":"curl -s https://example.com | grep -o \"application/ld+json\""}},{"id":"seo-sitemap","testId":"seo-sitemap","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"XML Sitemap","description":"Site has an accessible sitemap.xml.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery, records moderate severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: sitemap, indexing, crawling.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"XML Sitemap appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Create sitemap.xml with all important pages and submit to Search Console.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.seo-sitemap","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap","indexing","crawling"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"fetch(\"/sitemap.xml\").then(r => r.ok)","humanCommand":"curl -I https://example.com/sitemap.xml | head -1"}},{"id":"seo-robots-txt","testId":"seo-robots-txt","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Robots.txt","description":"Site has a valid robots.txt file.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery, records moderate severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: robots, crawling, indexing.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Robots.txt appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Create robots.txt with appropriate crawl directives and sitemap reference.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.seo-robots-txt","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["robots","crawling","indexing"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"fetch(\"/robots.txt\").then(r => r.ok)","humanCommand":"curl https://example.com/robots.txt"}},{"id":"seo-mobile-friendly","testId":"seo-mobile-friendly","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Mobile-Friendly","description":"Page passes mobile-friendly test.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery, records critical severity and high impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: mobile, responsive, ux.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Mobile-Friendly appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Add viewport meta tag, use responsive design, ensure touch targets are adequate.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.seo-mobile-friendly","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["mobile","responsive","ux"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"document.querySelector(\"meta[name=viewport]\") !== null","humanCommand":"Google Mobile-Friendly Test or Lighthouse mobile audit"}},{"id":"seo-https","testId":"seo-https","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"HTTPS","description":"Site uses HTTPS.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery, records critical severity and high impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: security, https, trust.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"HTTPS appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with measured evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Install SSL certificate and redirect HTTP to HTTPS. Re-run the public website analysis and confirm the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section shows updated evidence with a non-fabricated product status.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.seo-https","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["security","https","trust"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"location.protocol === \"https:\"","humanCommand":"curl -I https://example.com | grep -i \"HTTP/\""}},{"id":"seo-hreflang","testId":"seo-hreflang","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Hreflang Tags","description":"Multi-language sites have proper hreflang tags.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery, records moderate severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: i18n, international, language.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Hreflang Tags appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Add hreflang tags for each language version including x-default.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.seo-hreflang","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["i18n","international","language"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"document.querySelectorAll(\"link[hreflang]\").length","humanCommand":"curl -s https://example.com | grep -o \"hreflang=\\\"[^\\\"]*\\\"\""}},{"id":"seo-image-alt-seo","testId":"seo-image-alt-seo","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Image Alt Text (SEO)","description":"Images have descriptive alt text with keywords.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery, records moderate severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: images, alt-text, content.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Image Alt Text (SEO) appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Add descriptive alt text with relevant keywords to all images.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.seo-image-alt-seo","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["images","alt-text","content"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"document.querySelectorAll(\"img[alt]\").length / document.querySelectorAll(\"img\").length","humanCommand":"curl -s https://example.com | grep -o \"alt=\\\"[^\\\"]*\\\"\""}},{"id":"seo-url-structure","testId":"seo-url-structure","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"URL Structure","description":"URLs are clean and descriptive.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery, records moderate severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: url, structure, readability.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"URL Structure appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Use descriptive, hyphen-separated URLs. Avoid query parameters for main content.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.seo-url-structure","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["url","structure","readability"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"!/[?&].*=.*&/.test(location.href) && location.pathname.includes(\"-\")","humanCommand":"Inspect URL for readability and keyword usage"}},{"id":"seo-internal-links","testId":"seo-internal-links","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Internal Linking","description":"Page has adequate internal links.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery, records moderate severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: links, internal, navigation.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Internal Linking appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 3 links"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Add contextual internal links to related content. Use descriptive anchor text.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.seo-internal-links","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["links","internal","navigation"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"document.querySelectorAll(\"a[href^=\\\"/\\\"]\").length","humanCommand":"Count internal links on the page"}},{"id":"seo-page-speed","testId":"seo-page-speed","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Page Speed (SEO)","description":"Page loads fast enough for good SEO.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery, records serious severity and high impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: performance, speed, core-web-vitals.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Page Speed (SEO) appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with measured evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 3000 ms"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Optimize images, enable compression, minify resources, use CDN.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.seo-page-speed","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["performance","speed","core-web-vitals"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"performance.timing.loadEventEnd - performance.timing.navigationStart","humanCommand":"PageSpeed Insights or Lighthouse performance audit"}},{"id":"seo-content-length","testId":"seo-content-length","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Content Length","description":"Page has sufficient content (300+ words).. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery, records moderate severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: content, length, quality.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Content Length appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 300 words"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Add comprehensive, valuable content. Aim for 1000+ words for main pages.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.seo-content-length","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["content","length","quality"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"document.body.innerText.split(/\\s+/).length","humanCommand":"Count words on page using word counter tool"}},{"id":"seo-broken-links","testId":"seo-broken-links","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"No Broken Links","description":"Page has no broken internal or external links.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery, records moderate severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: links, broken, ux.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"No Broken Links appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Fix or remove broken links. Set up redirects for moved content.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.seo-broken-links","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["links","broken","ux"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"Check all links return 200 status","humanCommand":"npx broken-link-checker https://example.com"}},{"id":"seo-duplicate-content","testId":"seo-duplicate-content","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"No Duplicate Content","description":"Page content is unique and not duplicated.. This manual-guided website-analysis check is reported under SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery, records serious severity and high impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: content, duplicate, canonical.","checkType":"manual_guided","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"manual_guided","publicReadout":"No Duplicate Content appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with manual guided evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Human/operator review evidence"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Create unique content. Use canonical tags for necessary duplicates.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.seo-duplicate-content","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["content","duplicate","canonical"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"Check for duplicate title/description across pages","humanCommand":"site:example.com \"exact phrase\" in Google"}},{"id":"seo-favicon","testId":"seo-favicon","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Favicon","description":"Site has a favicon.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery, records minor severity and low impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: favicon, branding, ux.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Favicon appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Add favicon.ico and apple-touch-icon for better branding in search results.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.seo-favicon","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["favicon","branding","ux"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"document.querySelector(\"link[rel*=icon]\") !== null","humanCommand":"curl -I https://example.com/favicon.ico"}},{"id":"sec-https","testId":"sec-https","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"HTTPS Enabled","description":"Site uses HTTPS with valid certificate.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Security, Trust, and Privacy, records critical severity and high impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: https, ssl, encryption.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"HTTPS Enabled appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Install SSL certificate from Let's Encrypt or your hosting provider.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.sec-https","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["https","ssl","encryption"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"location.protocol === \"https:\"","humanCommand":"curl -I https://example.com | grep -i \"HTTP/\""}},{"id":"sec-hsts","testId":"sec-hsts","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"HSTS Header","description":"Site sends Strict-Transport-Security header.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Security, Trust, and Privacy, records serious severity and high impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: headers, https, hsts.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"HSTS Header appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Add Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains header.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.sec-hsts","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["headers","https","hsts"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"Check response headers for Strict-Transport-Security","humanCommand":"curl -I https://example.com | grep -i \"strict-transport\""}},{"id":"sec-csp","testId":"sec-csp","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Content Security Policy","description":"Site has a Content-Security-Policy header.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Security, Trust, and Privacy, records serious severity and high impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: headers, csp, xss.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Content Security Policy appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Add CSP header to prevent XSS attacks. Start with report-only mode.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.sec-csp","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["headers","csp","xss"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"Check response headers for Content-Security-Policy","humanCommand":"curl -I https://example.com | grep -i \"content-security-policy\""}},{"id":"sec-x-frame-options","testId":"sec-x-frame-options","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"X-Frame-Options","description":"Site prevents clickjacking with X-Frame-Options.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Security, Trust, and Privacy, records moderate severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: headers, clickjacking, iframe.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"X-Frame-Options appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Add X-Frame-Options: DENY or SAMEORIGIN header. Re-run the public website analysis and confirm the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section shows updated evidence with a non-fabricated product status.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.sec-x-frame-options","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["headers","clickjacking","iframe"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"Check response headers for X-Frame-Options","humanCommand":"curl -I https://example.com | grep -i \"x-frame-options\""}},{"id":"sec-x-content-type","testId":"sec-x-content-type","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"X-Content-Type-Options","description":"Site prevents MIME sniffing.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Security, Trust, and Privacy, records moderate severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: headers, mime, sniffing.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"X-Content-Type-Options appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Add X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff header. Re-run the public website analysis and confirm the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section shows updated evidence with a non-fabricated product status.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.sec-x-content-type","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["headers","mime","sniffing"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"Check response headers for X-Content-Type-Options","humanCommand":"curl -I https://example.com | grep -i \"x-content-type\""}},{"id":"sec-referrer-policy","testId":"sec-referrer-policy","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Referrer-Policy","description":"Site has a Referrer-Policy header.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Security, Trust, and Privacy, records moderate severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: headers, referrer, privacy.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Referrer-Policy appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Add Referrer-Policy: strict-origin-when-cross-origin header.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.sec-referrer-policy","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["headers","referrer","privacy"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"Check response headers for Referrer-Policy","humanCommand":"curl -I https://example.com | grep -i \"referrer-policy\""}},{"id":"sec-permissions-policy","testId":"sec-permissions-policy","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Permissions-Policy","description":"Site has a Permissions-Policy header.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Security, Trust, and Privacy, records moderate severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: headers, permissions, features.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Permissions-Policy appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Add Permissions-Policy header to control browser features.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.sec-permissions-policy","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["headers","permissions","features"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"Check response headers for Permissions-Policy","humanCommand":"curl -I https://example.com | grep -i \"permissions-policy\""}},{"id":"sec-no-mixed-content","testId":"sec-no-mixed-content","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"No Mixed Content","description":"HTTPS page has no HTTP resources.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Security, Trust, and Privacy, records serious severity and high impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: https, mixed-content, resources.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"No Mixed Content appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Update all resource URLs to use HTTPS or protocol-relative URLs.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.sec-no-mixed-content","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["https","mixed-content","resources"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"document.querySelectorAll(\"[src^=\\\"http:\\\"]\").length === 0","humanCommand":"Open DevTools Console and check for mixed content warnings"}},{"id":"sec-subresource-integrity","testId":"sec-subresource-integrity","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Subresource Integrity","description":"External scripts use integrity attribute.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Security, Trust, and Privacy, records moderate severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: sri, integrity, cdn.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Subresource Integrity appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Add integrity and crossorigin attributes to external scripts.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.sec-subresource-integrity","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sri","integrity","cdn"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"document.querySelectorAll(\"script[src][integrity]\").length","humanCommand":"Check external scripts for integrity attribute"}},{"id":"sec-cookie-secure","testId":"sec-cookie-secure","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Secure Cookies","description":"Cookies use Secure and HttpOnly flags.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Security, Trust, and Privacy, records serious severity and high impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: cookies, secure, httponly.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Secure Cookies appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Set Secure, HttpOnly, and SameSite flags on all cookies.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.sec-cookie-secure","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["cookies","secure","httponly"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"Check Set-Cookie headers for Secure; HttpOnly flags","humanCommand":"curl -I https://example.com | grep -i \"set-cookie\""}},{"id":"sec-no-inline-scripts","testId":"sec-no-inline-scripts","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"No Inline Scripts","description":"Page avoids inline JavaScript for CSP compliance.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Security, Trust, and Privacy, records moderate severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: csp, inline, xss.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"No Inline Scripts appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Move inline scripts to external files. Use nonce or hash for necessary inline scripts.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.sec-no-inline-scripts","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["csp","inline","xss"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"document.querySelectorAll(\"script:not([src])\").length","humanCommand":"Count inline <script> tags without src attribute"}},{"id":"sec-form-action","testId":"sec-form-action","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Form Action Security","description":"Forms submit to HTTPS endpoints.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Security, Trust, and Privacy, records serious severity and high impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: forms, https, data.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Form Action Security appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Ensure all form actions use HTTPS URLs. Re-run the public website analysis and confirm the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section shows updated evidence with a non-fabricated product status.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.sec-form-action","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["forms","https","data"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"document.querySelectorAll(\"form[action^=\\\"http:\\\"]\").length === 0","humanCommand":"Check all form action attributes"}},{"id":"sec-cors","testId":"sec-cors","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"CORS Configuration","description":"API has proper CORS headers.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Security, Trust, and Privacy, records moderate severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: cors, api, headers.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"CORS Configuration appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Configure CORS to allow only trusted origins. Avoid wildcard (*).","traceSpanName":"insights.test.sec-cors","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["cors","api","headers"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"Check Access-Control-Allow-Origin header","humanCommand":"curl -I -H \"Origin: https://evil.com\" https://example.com/api"}},{"id":"sec-server-info","testId":"sec-server-info","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"No Server Information Disclosure","description":"Server headers do not reveal version info.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Security, Trust, and Privacy, records minor severity and low impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: headers, disclosure, fingerprint.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"No Server Information Disclosure appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Remove or obscure Server and X-Powered-By headers. Re-run the public website analysis and confirm the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section shows updated evidence with a non-fabricated product status.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.sec-server-info","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["headers","disclosure","fingerprint"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"Check response headers for Server, X-Powered-By","humanCommand":"curl -I https://example.com | grep -i \"server\\|x-powered-by\""}},{"id":"sec-sql-injection","testId":"sec-sql-injection","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"SQL Injection Prevention","description":"Application uses parameterized queries.. This manual-guided website-analysis check is reported under Security, Trust, and Privacy, records critical severity and high impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: sql, injection, database.","checkType":"manual_guided","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"manual_guided","publicReadout":"SQL Injection Prevention appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with manual guided evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Human/operator review evidence"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Use parameterized queries or ORM. Never concatenate user input into SQL.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.sec-sql-injection","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sql","injection","database"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"Code review for parameterized queries","humanCommand":"Review database query code for parameter binding"}},{"id":"ai-llms-txt","testId":"ai-llms-txt","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs.txt Present","description":"Site has /llms.txt for AI crawler guidance.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Agent, API, and MCP Readiness, records serious severity and high impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: llms-txt, ai-crawler, discovery.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"LLMs.txt Present appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Create /llms.txt with site description, key content, and AI usage guidelines.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ai-llms-txt","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms-txt","ai-crawler","discovery"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"fetch(\"/llms.txt\").then(r => r.ok)","humanCommand":"curl https://example.com/llms.txt"}},{"id":"ai-llms-full-txt","testId":"ai-llms-full-txt","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs-Full.txt Present","description":"Site has /llms-full.txt for comprehensive AI context.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Agent, API, and MCP Readiness, records moderate severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: llms-txt, ai-training, documentation.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"LLMs-Full.txt Present appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Create /llms-full.txt with full site documentation for AI training.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ai-llms-full-txt","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms-txt","ai-training","documentation"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"fetch(\"/llms-full.txt\").then(r => r.ok)","humanCommand":"curl https://example.com/llms-full.txt"}},{"id":"ai-structured-data","testId":"ai-structured-data","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"AI-Friendly Structured Data","description":"Site uses JSON-LD structured data for AI parsing.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Agent, API, and MCP Readiness, records serious severity and high impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: structured-data, json-ld, schema.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"AI-Friendly Structured Data appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Add comprehensive JSON-LD structured data with Organization, FAQPage, HowTo schemas.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ai-structured-data","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["structured-data","json-ld","schema"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"document.querySelectorAll(\"script[type=\\\"application/ld+json\\\"]\").length > 0","humanCommand":"curl -s https://example.com | grep \"application/ld+json\""}},{"id":"ai-faq-schema","testId":"ai-faq-schema","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"FAQ Schema","description":"Site uses FAQPage schema for direct answers.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Agent, API, and MCP Readiness, records moderate severity and high impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: faq, schema, snippets.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"FAQ Schema appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"high","remediation":"Add FAQPage schema with question-answer pairs for AI snippets.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ai-faq-schema","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["faq","schema","snippets"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"Check for FAQPage in JSON-LD","humanCommand":"curl -s https://example.com | grep -o \"FAQPage\""}},{"id":"ai-howto-schema","testId":"ai-howto-schema","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"HowTo Schema","description":"Instructional content uses HowTo schema.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Agent, API, and MCP Readiness, records moderate severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: howto, schema, instructions.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"HowTo Schema appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Add HowTo schema with step-by-step instructions for procedural content.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ai-howto-schema","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["howto","schema","instructions"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"Check for HowTo in JSON-LD","humanCommand":"curl -s https://example.com | grep -o \"HowTo\""}},{"id":"ai-semantic-html","testId":"ai-semantic-html","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Semantic HTML Structure","description":"Page uses semantic HTML for AI understanding.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Agent, API, and MCP Readiness, records serious severity and high impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: semantic, html, structure.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Semantic HTML Structure appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Use semantic HTML5 elements: article, section, aside, nav, header, footer, main.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ai-semantic-html","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["semantic","html","structure"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"document.querySelectorAll(\"article, section, aside, nav, header, footer, main\").length >= 4","humanCommand":"Count semantic HTML elements on page"}},{"id":"ai-heading-hierarchy","testId":"ai-heading-hierarchy","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Clear Heading Hierarchy","description":"Page has logical heading structure for AI parsing.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Agent, API, and MCP Readiness, records moderate severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: headings, structure, outline.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Clear Heading Hierarchy appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Use proper heading hierarchy. Each section should have clear topical headings.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ai-heading-hierarchy","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["headings","structure","outline"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"Validate heading order h1 -> h2 -> h3 etc.","humanCommand":"Outline headings and verify logical hierarchy"}},{"id":"ai-content-chunking","testId":"ai-content-chunking","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Content Chunking","description":"Content is organized in digestible chunks.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Agent, API, and MCP Readiness, records moderate severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: content, structure, readability.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Content Chunking appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Break content into clear sections with headings. Use short paragraphs and lists.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ai-content-chunking","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["content","structure","readability"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"Count paragraphs and their average length","humanCommand":"Review content structure for clear sections"}},{"id":"ai-factoid-markup","testId":"ai-factoid-markup","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Factoid Markup","description":"Key facts are marked up for extraction.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Agent, API, and MCP Readiness, records moderate severity and high impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: facts, extraction, markup.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Factoid Markup appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"high","remediation":"Use <dl> for definitions, tables for data, clear labels for key facts.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ai-factoid-markup","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["facts","extraction","markup"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"Check for definition lists, data tables, key-value markup","humanCommand":"Review if key facts are in structured format"}},{"id":"ai-citation-ready","testId":"ai-citation-ready","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Citation-Ready Content","description":"Content includes author, date, and source info.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Agent, API, and MCP Readiness, records moderate severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: citation, author, credibility.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Citation-Ready Content appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Add author, publication date, and modification date to content and metadata.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ai-citation-ready","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["citation","author","credibility"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"Check for author, datePublished, dateModified in metadata","humanCommand":"Verify author and date information is present"}},{"id":"ai-api-documentation","testId":"ai-api-documentation","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"API Documentation","description":"API is documented with OpenAPI/Swagger.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Agent, API, and MCP Readiness, records moderate severity and high impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: api, documentation, openapi.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"API Documentation appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"high","remediation":"Create OpenAPI specification for APIs. Expose at /api/docs.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ai-api-documentation","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["api","documentation","openapi"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"fetch(\"/api/docs\").then(r => r.ok) || fetch(\"/openapi.json\").then(r => r.ok)","humanCommand":"curl https://example.com/api/docs"}},{"id":"ai-machine-readable","testId":"ai-machine-readable","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Machine-Readable Format","description":"Content available in machine-readable formats.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Agent, API, and MCP Readiness, records moderate severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: feeds, json, machine-readable.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Machine-Readable Format appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Provide RSS/Atom feeds, JSON endpoints for content. Re-run the public website analysis and confirm the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section shows updated evidence with a non-fabricated product status.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ai-machine-readable","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["feeds","json","machine-readable"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"Check for JSON, RSS, Atom feed availability","humanCommand":"curl https://example.com/feed.xml"}},{"id":"ai-entity-linking","testId":"ai-entity-linking","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Entity Linking","description":"Content links to authoritative sources.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Agent, API, and MCP Readiness, records minor severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: links, entities, authority.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Entity Linking appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"medium","remediation":"Link key concepts to authoritative sources like Wikipedia, official documentation.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ai-entity-linking","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["links","entities","authority"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"Count links to Wikipedia, schema.org, authoritative domains","humanCommand":"Review outbound links for authority"}},{"id":"ai-conversational-content","testId":"ai-conversational-content","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Conversational Content","description":"Content written in Q&A or conversational format.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Agent, API, and MCP Readiness, records minor severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: conversational, questions, snippets.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Conversational Content appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"medium","remediation":"Structure content around questions. Use FAQ sections and clear answers.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ai-conversational-content","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["conversational","questions","snippets"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"Count question patterns in headings","humanCommand":"Review if content answers common questions"}},{"id":"ai-summary-available","testId":"ai-summary-available","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Content Summaries","description":"Pages have clear summaries or abstracts.. This manual-guided website-analysis check is reported under Agent, API, and MCP Readiness, records minor severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: summary, abstract, overview.","checkType":"manual_guided","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"manual_guided","publicReadout":"Content Summaries appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with manual guided evidence, minor severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Human/operator review evidence"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"medium","remediation":"Add executive summary, TL;DR, or abstract at top of long content.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ai-summary-available","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["summary","abstract","overview"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"Check for summary, abstract, TL;DR sections","humanCommand":"Verify each page has a clear summary"}},{"id":"bp-doctype","testId":"bp-doctype","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Valid DOCTYPE","description":"Page has HTML5 DOCTYPE declaration.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Best Practices and Route Quality, records moderate severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: doctype, html, standards.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Valid DOCTYPE appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Ensure <!DOCTYPE html> is the first line of the document.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.bp-doctype","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["doctype","html","standards"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"document.doctype?.name === \"html\"","humanCommand":"curl -s https://example.com | head -1"}},{"id":"bp-charset","testId":"bp-charset","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Character Encoding","description":"Page declares UTF-8 character encoding.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Best Practices and Route Quality, records moderate severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: charset, encoding, i18n.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Character Encoding appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Add <meta charset=\"UTF-8\"> as first element in <head>. Re-run the public website analysis and confirm the Best Practices and Route Quality report section shows updated evidence with a non-fabricated product status.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.bp-charset","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["charset","encoding","i18n"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"document.characterSet === \"UTF-8\"","humanCommand":"curl -s https://example.com | grep -i \"charset\""}},{"id":"bp-viewport","testId":"bp-viewport","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Viewport Meta Tag","description":"Page has proper viewport meta tag.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Best Practices and Route Quality, records serious severity and high impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: viewport, responsive, mobile.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Viewport Meta Tag appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Add <meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width, initial-scale=1\">.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.bp-viewport","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["viewport","responsive","mobile"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"document.querySelector(\"meta[name=viewport]\")?.content.includes(\"width=device-width\")","humanCommand":"curl -s https://example.com | grep \"viewport\""}},{"id":"bp-no-document-write","testId":"bp-no-document-write","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"No document.write()","description":"Page does not use document.write().. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Best Practices and Route Quality, records moderate severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: javascript, performance, deprecated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"No document.write() appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Replace document.write with DOM manipulation methods. Re-run the public website analysis and confirm the Best Practices and Route Quality report section shows updated evidence with a non-fabricated product status.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.bp-no-document-write","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["javascript","performance","deprecated"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"Search scripts for document.write","humanCommand":"grep -r \"document.write\" *.js"}},{"id":"bp-no-console-logs","testId":"bp-no-console-logs","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"No Console Logs in Production","description":"Production code has no console.log statements.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Best Practices and Route Quality, records minor severity and low impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: javascript, debugging, production.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"No Console Logs in Production appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Remove console.log statements or use build tool to strip them.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.bp-no-console-logs","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["javascript","debugging","production"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"Search scripts for console.log","humanCommand":"grep -r \"console.log\" *.js"}},{"id":"bp-valid-html","testId":"bp-valid-html","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Valid HTML","description":"Page passes HTML validation.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Best Practices and Route Quality, records moderate severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: html, validation, standards.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Valid HTML appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Fix HTML validation errors reported by W3C validator. Re-run the public website analysis and confirm the Best Practices and Route Quality report section shows updated evidence with a non-fabricated product status.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.bp-valid-html","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["html","validation","standards"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"W3C HTML Validator API","humanCommand":"npx html-validate https://example.com"}},{"id":"bp-no-deprecated-apis","testId":"bp-no-deprecated-apis","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"No Deprecated APIs","description":"Page does not use deprecated web APIs.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Best Practices and Route Quality, records moderate severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: apis, deprecated, modern.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"No Deprecated APIs appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Replace deprecated APIs with modern alternatives. Re-run the public website analysis and confirm the Best Practices and Route Quality report section shows updated evidence with a non-fabricated product status.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.bp-no-deprecated-apis","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["apis","deprecated","modern"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"lighthouse --only-categories=best-practices --output=json | jq \".audits[\"deprecations\"]\"","humanCommand":"Check DevTools console for deprecation warnings"}},{"id":"bp-error-handling","testId":"bp-error-handling","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"JavaScript Error Handling","description":"Page has no unhandled JavaScript errors.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Best Practices and Route Quality, records serious severity and high impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: javascript, errors, reliability.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"JavaScript Error Handling appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Add error boundaries, try-catch blocks, and global error handlers.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.bp-error-handling","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["javascript","errors","reliability"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"window.onerror handler check","humanCommand":"Open DevTools Console and check for red errors"}},{"id":"bp-print-styles","testId":"bp-print-styles","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Print Stylesheet","description":"Page has print-optimized styles.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Best Practices and Route Quality, records minor severity and low impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: print, css, ux.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Print Stylesheet appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Add @media print styles to optimize for printing. Re-run the public website analysis and confirm the Best Practices and Route Quality report section shows updated evidence with a non-fabricated product status.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.bp-print-styles","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["print","css","ux"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"document.querySelector(\"link[media=print], style\") with @media print","humanCommand":"Print preview the page and check formatting"}},{"id":"bp-manifest","testId":"bp-manifest","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Web App Manifest","description":"Site has a web app manifest for PWA support.. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Best Practices and Route Quality, records minor severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: pwa, manifest, installable.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Web App Manifest appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"medium","remediation":"Create manifest.json with name, icons, theme_color, and display properties.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.bp-manifest","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["pwa","manifest","installable"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"document.querySelector(\"link[rel=manifest]\") !== null","humanCommand":"curl https://example.com/manifest.json"}},{"id":"sd-json-ld","testId":"sd-json-ld","suiteId":"structured-data","suiteName":"Structured Data","phase2Dimensions":["structured-data","discovery","aeo","geo"],"name":"JSON-LD Structured Data","description":"Page contains valid JSON-LD structured data for rich search results. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Structured Data, Feeds, and Discovery Artifacts, records serious severity and high impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: seo, structured-data, json-ld, schema.org.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"structured-data-feeds","reportSectionName":"Structured Data, Feeds, and Discovery Artifacts","reportingCategory":"Structured Data, Feeds, and Discovery Artifacts / Structured Data","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"JSON-LD Structured Data appears in the Structured Data, Feeds, and Discovery Artifacts report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 1 count"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Add JSON-LD structured data using schema.org vocabulary. Include @context, @type, and relevant properties for your content type (Article, Product, Organization, etc.).","traceSpanName":"insights.test.sd-json-ld","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["seo","structured-data","json-ld","schema.org"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"curl -s URL | grep -o '<script[^>]*application/ld+json[^>]*>'","humanCommand":"View page source and search for \"application/ld+json\" script tags"}},{"id":"sd-json-ld-valid","testId":"sd-json-ld-valid","suiteId":"structured-data","suiteName":"Structured Data","phase2Dimensions":["structured-data","discovery","aeo","geo"],"name":"JSON-LD Validity","description":"All JSON-LD blocks are syntactically valid JSON. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Structured Data, Feeds, and Discovery Artifacts, records serious severity and high impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: seo, structured-data, json-ld, validation.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"structured-data-feeds","reportSectionName":"Structured Data, Feeds, and Discovery Artifacts","reportingCategory":"Structured Data, Feeds, and Discovery Artifacts / Structured Data","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"JSON-LD Validity appears in the Structured Data, Feeds, and Discovery Artifacts report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 100 %"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Use a JSON validator to check your JSON-LD syntax. Ensure all strings are properly quoted, commas are correct, and brackets are balanced.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.sd-json-ld-valid","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["seo","structured-data","json-ld","validation"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"curl -s URL | grep -oP '<script[^>]*application/ld\\+json[^>]*>\\K[^<]+' | jq .","humanCommand":"Extract JSON-LD content and validate using json.platphormnews.com/api/v1/validate"}},{"id":"sd-rss-feed","testId":"sd-rss-feed","suiteId":"structured-data","suiteName":"Structured Data","phase2Dimensions":["structured-data","discovery","aeo","geo"],"name":"RSS Feed Available","description":"Site provides an RSS feed for content syndication. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Structured Data, Feeds, and Discovery Artifacts, records moderate severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: seo, rss, syndication, feed.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"structured-data-feeds","reportSectionName":"Structured Data, Feeds, and Discovery Artifacts","reportingCategory":"Structured Data, Feeds, and Discovery Artifacts / Structured Data","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"RSS Feed Available appears in the Structured Data, Feeds, and Discovery Artifacts report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 1 boolean"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Create an RSS feed and add a <link rel=\"alternate\" type=\"application/rss+xml\" href=\"/rss.xml\"> tag to your HTML head.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.sd-rss-feed","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["seo","rss","syndication","feed"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"curl -s URL | grep -o '<link[^>]*application/rss+xml[^>]*>'","humanCommand":"Check page source for RSS link tags or visit /rss.xml or /feed.xml"}},{"id":"sd-rss-valid","testId":"sd-rss-valid","suiteId":"structured-data","suiteName":"Structured Data","phase2Dimensions":["structured-data","discovery","aeo","geo"],"name":"RSS Feed Valid","description":"RSS feed is well-formed XML and follows RSS specification. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Structured Data, Feeds, and Discovery Artifacts, records moderate severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: seo, rss, xml, validation.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"structured-data-feeds","reportSectionName":"Structured Data, Feeds, and Discovery Artifacts","reportingCategory":"Structured Data, Feeds, and Discovery Artifacts / Structured Data","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"RSS Feed Valid appears in the Structured Data, Feeds, and Discovery Artifacts report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 100 %"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Ensure your RSS feed follows the RSS 2.0 specification with proper XML encoding, required elements (title, link, description), and valid dates.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.sd-rss-valid","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["seo","rss","xml","validation"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"curl -s URL/rss.xml | xmllint --noout - 2>&1","humanCommand":"Validate RSS feed using xml.platphormnews.com/api/v1/parse"}},{"id":"sd-sitemap","testId":"sd-sitemap","suiteId":"structured-data","suiteName":"Structured Data","phase2Dimensions":["structured-data","discovery","aeo","geo"],"name":"XML Sitemap Available","description":"Site provides an XML sitemap for search engine crawling. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Structured Data, Feeds, and Discovery Artifacts, records serious severity and high impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: seo, sitemap, xml, crawling.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"structured-data-feeds","reportSectionName":"Structured Data, Feeds, and Discovery Artifacts","reportingCategory":"Structured Data, Feeds, and Discovery Artifacts / Structured Data","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"XML Sitemap Available appears in the Structured Data, Feeds, and Discovery Artifacts report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 1 boolean"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Create a sitemap.xml file listing all important URLs. Submit it to Google Search Console and reference it in robots.txt.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.sd-sitemap","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["seo","sitemap","xml","crawling"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"curl -s -o /dev/null -w \"%{http_code}\" URL/sitemap.xml","humanCommand":"Visit /sitemap.xml and check if it returns a valid XML document"}},{"id":"sd-sitemap-valid","testId":"sd-sitemap-valid","suiteId":"structured-data","suiteName":"Structured Data","phase2Dimensions":["structured-data","discovery","aeo","geo"],"name":"Sitemap Valid XML","description":"Sitemap is well-formed XML following the sitemap protocol. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Structured Data, Feeds, and Discovery Artifacts, records moderate severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: seo, sitemap, xml, validation.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"structured-data-feeds","reportSectionName":"Structured Data, Feeds, and Discovery Artifacts","reportingCategory":"Structured Data, Feeds, and Discovery Artifacts / Structured Data","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap Valid XML appears in the Structured Data, Feeds, and Discovery Artifacts report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 100 %"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Ensure your sitemap follows the sitemaps.org protocol with proper XML namespace, valid URL elements, and optional lastmod/priority fields.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.sd-sitemap-valid","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["seo","sitemap","xml","validation"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"curl -s URL/sitemap.xml | xmllint --schema sitemap.xsd --noout - 2>&1","humanCommand":"Validate sitemap using xml.platphormnews.com/api/v1/parse"}},{"id":"sd-llms-txt","testId":"sd-llms-txt","suiteId":"structured-data","suiteName":"Structured Data","phase2Dimensions":["structured-data","discovery","aeo","geo"],"name":"LLMs.txt Available","description":"Site provides llms.txt file for AI/LLM discoverability. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Structured Data, Feeds, and Discovery Artifacts, records moderate severity and high impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: ai, llm, discoverability, llms.txt.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"structured-data-feeds","reportSectionName":"Structured Data, Feeds, and Discovery Artifacts","reportingCategory":"Structured Data, Feeds, and Discovery Artifacts / Structured Data","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs.txt Available appears in the Structured Data, Feeds, and Discovery Artifacts report section with model assisted available evidence, moderate severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 1 boolean"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"high","remediation":"Create an llms.txt file in markdown format describing your site, API, and capabilities for AI assistants. See llmstxt.org for the specification.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.sd-llms-txt","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["ai","llm","discoverability","llms.txt"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"curl -s -o /dev/null -w \"%{http_code}\" URL/llms.txt","humanCommand":"Visit /llms.txt and check if it returns markdown content describing the site for LLMs"}},{"id":"sd-llms-structured","testId":"sd-llms-structured","suiteId":"structured-data","suiteName":"Structured Data","phase2Dimensions":["structured-data","discovery","aeo","geo"],"name":"LLMs.txt Well-Structured","description":"llms.txt file contains proper markdown structure with headings and sections. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Structured Data, Feeds, and Discovery Artifacts, records minor severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: ai, llm, markdown, structure.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"structured-data-feeds","reportSectionName":"Structured Data, Feeds, and Discovery Artifacts","reportingCategory":"Structured Data, Feeds, and Discovery Artifacts / Structured Data","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs.txt Well-Structured appears in the Structured Data, Feeds, and Discovery Artifacts report section with model assisted available evidence, minor severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 3 sections"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"medium","remediation":"Structure your llms.txt with clear markdown headings: # Title, ## Overview, ## API, ## Features, ## Links. Include relevant information for AI assistants.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.sd-llms-structured","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["ai","llm","markdown","structure"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"curl -s URL/llms.txt | grep -c \"^#\"","humanCommand":"Analyze llms.txt structure using markdown.platphormnews.com/api/v1/transform"}},{"id":"sd-open-graph","testId":"sd-open-graph","suiteId":"structured-data","suiteName":"Structured Data","phase2Dimensions":["structured-data","discovery","aeo","geo"],"name":"Open Graph Tags","description":"Page includes Open Graph meta tags for social sharing. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Structured Data, Feeds, and Discovery Artifacts, records moderate severity and medium impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: seo, social, open-graph, meta.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"structured-data-feeds","reportSectionName":"Structured Data, Feeds, and Discovery Artifacts","reportingCategory":"Structured Data, Feeds, and Discovery Artifacts / Structured Data","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Open Graph Tags appears in the Structured Data, Feeds, and Discovery Artifacts report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 4 tags"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Add Open Graph meta tags: og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url, og:type. These improve social media sharing previews.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.sd-open-graph","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["seo","social","open-graph","meta"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"curl -s URL | grep -c 'property=\"og:'","humanCommand":"Check page source for meta tags with property=\"og:*\""}},{"id":"sd-twitter-cards","testId":"sd-twitter-cards","suiteId":"structured-data","suiteName":"Structured Data","phase2Dimensions":["structured-data","discovery","aeo","geo"],"name":"Twitter Card Tags","description":"Page includes Twitter Card meta tags for Twitter/X sharing. This automated or measured website-analysis check is reported under Structured Data, Feeds, and Discovery Artifacts, records minor severity and low impact evidence, and must return a truthful product status with public-safe evidence instead of placeholder pass/fail data; tags: seo, social, twitter, meta.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"structured-data-feeds","reportSectionName":"Structured Data, Feeds, and Discovery Artifacts","reportingCategory":"Structured Data, Feeds, and Discovery Artifacts / Structured Data","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Twitter Card Tags appears in the Structured Data, Feeds, and Discovery Artifacts report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 3 tags"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Add Twitter Card meta tags: twitter:card, twitter:title, twitter:description, twitter:image. Use \"summary_large_image\" for best visual impact.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.sd-twitter-cards","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["seo","social","twitter","meta"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"curl -s URL | grep -c 'name=\"twitter:'","humanCommand":"Check page source for meta tags with name=\"twitter:*\""}},{"id":"ni-w3c-01","testId":"ni-w3c-01","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C Standards Conformance: Availability","description":"Validates public route availability and successful bounded fetch behavior for w3c standards, semantic validity, and interoperable markup behavior. Evidence should include HTTP status, timeout, and redirect evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C Standards Conformance: Availability appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the availability evidence for w3c standards conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-w3c-01","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["w3c","html","standards","quality","availability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(html.length>0?'ok':'empty'))\" # group:w3c check:1","humanCommand":"Validate markup with validator.w3.org and check semantic landmarks; review the availability evidence dimension for W3C Standards Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-w3c-02","testId":"ni-w3c-02","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C Standards Conformance: Public Safety","description":"Validates public-safe access boundaries without exposing private or protected data for w3c standards, semantic validity, and interoperable markup behavior. Evidence should include route policy and response-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C Standards Conformance: Public Safety appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the public safety evidence for w3c standards conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-w3c-02","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["w3c","html","standards","quality","public-safety","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(html.length>0?'ok':'empty'))\" # group:w3c check:2","humanCommand":"Validate markup with validator.w3.org and check semantic landmarks; review the public-safety evidence dimension for W3C Standards Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-w3c-03","testId":"ni-w3c-03","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C Standards Conformance: Canonical Url","description":"Validates canonical URL stability and normalized route identity for w3c standards, semantic validity, and interoperable markup behavior. Evidence should include canonical tags, redirects, and normalized URL evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C Standards Conformance: Canonical Url appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the canonical url evidence for w3c standards conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-w3c-03","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["w3c","html","standards","quality","canonical-url","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(html.length>0?'ok':'empty'))\" # group:w3c check:3","humanCommand":"Validate markup with validator.w3.org and check semantic landmarks; review the canonical-url evidence dimension for W3C Standards Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-w3c-04","testId":"ni-w3c-04","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C Standards Conformance: Metadata Clarity","description":"Validates title, description, and page-specific metadata clarity for w3c standards, semantic validity, and interoperable markup behavior. Evidence should include HTML metadata and extracted text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C Standards Conformance: Metadata Clarity appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the metadata clarity evidence for w3c standards conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-w3c-04","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["w3c","html","standards","quality","metadata-clarity","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(html.length>0?'ok':'empty'))\" # group:w3c check:4","humanCommand":"Validate markup with validator.w3.org and check semantic landmarks; review the metadata-clarity evidence dimension for W3C Standards Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-w3c-05","testId":"ni-w3c-05","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C Standards Conformance: Semantic Structure","description":"Validates semantic HTML structure for humans, agents, and assistive technology for w3c standards, semantic validity, and interoperable markup behavior. Evidence should include heading, landmark, and element evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C Standards Conformance: Semantic Structure appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the semantic structure evidence for w3c standards conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-w3c-05","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["w3c","html","standards","quality","semantic-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(html.length>0?'ok':'empty'))\" # group:w3c check:5","humanCommand":"Validate markup with validator.w3.org and check semantic landmarks; review the semantic-structure evidence dimension for W3C Standards Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-w3c-06","testId":"ni-w3c-06","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C Standards Conformance: Machine Readability","description":"Validates machine-readable public content and predictable parsing surfaces for w3c standards, semantic validity, and interoperable markup behavior. Evidence should include structured tags, JSON-LD, and document-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C Standards Conformance: Machine Readability appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the machine readability evidence for w3c standards conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-w3c-06","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["w3c","html","standards","quality","machine-readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(html.length>0?'ok':'empty'))\" # group:w3c check:6","humanCommand":"Validate markup with validator.w3.org and check semantic landmarks; review the machine-readability evidence dimension for W3C Standards Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-w3c-07","testId":"ni-w3c-07","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C Standards Conformance: Agent Discovery","description":"Validates agent discovery hints and AI-readable policy/documentation signals for w3c standards, semantic validity, and interoperable markup behavior. Evidence should include llms, policy, MCP, OpenAPI, or schema evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C Standards Conformance: Agent Discovery appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the agent discovery evidence for w3c standards conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-w3c-07","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["w3c","html","standards","quality","agent-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(html.length>0?'ok':'empty'))\" # group:w3c check:7","humanCommand":"Validate markup with validator.w3.org and check semantic landmarks; review the agent-discovery evidence dimension for W3C Standards Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-w3c-08","testId":"ni-w3c-08","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C Standards Conformance: Crawler Discovery","description":"Validates crawler discovery paths through robots, sitemap, feeds, and canonical links for w3c standards, semantic validity, and interoperable markup behavior. Evidence should include discovery artifact and link evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C Standards Conformance: Crawler Discovery appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the crawler discovery evidence for w3c standards conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-w3c-08","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["w3c","html","standards","quality","crawler-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(html.length>0?'ok':'empty'))\" # group:w3c check:8","humanCommand":"Validate markup with validator.w3.org and check semantic landmarks; review the crawler-discovery evidence dimension for W3C Standards Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-w3c-09","testId":"ni-w3c-09","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C Standards Conformance: Answerability","description":"Validates direct answer extraction and quotable explanatory content for w3c standards, semantic validity, and interoperable markup behavior. Evidence should include question, summary, heading, and paragraph evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C Standards Conformance: Answerability appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the answerability evidence for w3c standards conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-w3c-09","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["w3c","html","standards","quality","answerability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(html.length>0?'ok':'empty'))\" # group:w3c check:9","humanCommand":"Validate markup with validator.w3.org and check semantic landmarks; review the answerability evidence dimension for W3C Standards Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-w3c-10","testId":"ni-w3c-10","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C Standards Conformance: Generative Context","description":"Validates GEO context quality for generative engines without inventing measured facts for w3c standards, semantic validity, and interoperable markup behavior. Evidence should include entity, source, and instruction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C Standards Conformance: Generative Context appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the generative context evidence for w3c standards conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-w3c-10","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["w3c","html","standards","quality","generative-context","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(html.length>0?'ok':'empty'))\" # group:w3c check:10","humanCommand":"Validate markup with validator.w3.org and check semantic landmarks; review the generative-context evidence dimension for W3C Standards Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-w3c-11","testId":"ni-w3c-11","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C Standards Conformance: Search Intent","description":"Validates search intent alignment and snippet-friendly content structure for w3c standards, semantic validity, and interoperable markup behavior. Evidence should include metadata, headings, and topical text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C Standards Conformance: Search Intent appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the search intent evidence for w3c standards conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-w3c-11","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["w3c","html","standards","quality","search-intent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(html.length>0?'ok':'empty'))\" # group:w3c check:11","humanCommand":"Validate markup with validator.w3.org and check semantic landmarks; review the search-intent evidence dimension for W3C Standards Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-w3c-12","testId":"ni-w3c-12","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C Standards Conformance: Accessibility Semantics","description":"Validates accessible names, relationships, landmarks, and keyboard-relevant structure for w3c standards, semantic validity, and interoperable markup behavior. Evidence should include ARIA, labels, landmarks, and control evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C Standards Conformance: Accessibility Semantics appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the accessibility semantics evidence for w3c standards conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-w3c-12","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["w3c","html","standards","quality","accessibility-semantics","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(html.length>0?'ok':'empty'))\" # group:w3c check:12","humanCommand":"Validate markup with validator.w3.org and check semantic landmarks; review the accessibility-semantics evidence dimension for W3C Standards Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-w3c-13","testId":"ni-w3c-13","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C Standards Conformance: Mobile Readiness","description":"Validates mobile viewport, responsive content, and touch-friendly layout signals for w3c standards, semantic validity, and interoperable markup behavior. Evidence should include viewport and responsive asset evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C Standards Conformance: Mobile Readiness appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the mobile readiness evidence for w3c standards conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-w3c-13","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["w3c","html","standards","quality","mobile-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(html.length>0?'ok':'empty'))\" # group:w3c check:13","humanCommand":"Validate markup with validator.w3.org and check semantic landmarks; review the mobile-readiness evidence dimension for W3C Standards Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-w3c-14","testId":"ni-w3c-14","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C Standards Conformance: Performance Budget","description":"Validates performance budget compliance using measured or bounded deterministic inputs for w3c standards, semantic validity, and interoperable markup behavior. Evidence should include timing, byte, and Lighthouse-derived evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C Standards Conformance: Performance Budget appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the performance budget evidence for w3c standards conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-w3c-14","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["w3c","html","standards","quality","performance-budget","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(html.length>0?'ok':'empty'))\" # group:w3c check:14","humanCommand":"Validate markup with validator.w3.org and check semantic landmarks; review the performance-budget evidence dimension for W3C Standards Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-w3c-15","testId":"ni-w3c-15","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C Standards Conformance: Resource Efficiency","description":"Validates resource size, script/style count, and optimization opportunity signals for w3c standards, semantic validity, and interoperable markup behavior. Evidence should include resource and markup evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C Standards Conformance: Resource Efficiency appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the resource efficiency evidence for w3c standards conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-w3c-15","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["w3c","html","standards","quality","resource-efficiency","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(html.length>0?'ok':'empty'))\" # group:w3c check:15","humanCommand":"Validate markup with validator.w3.org and check semantic landmarks; review the resource-efficiency evidence dimension for W3C Standards Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-w3c-16","testId":"ni-w3c-16","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C Standards Conformance: Cache Freshness","description":"Validates cache behavior, freshness hints, and stale-content risk for w3c standards, semantic validity, and interoperable markup behavior. Evidence should include HTTP cache and timestamp evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C Standards Conformance: Cache Freshness appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the cache freshness evidence for w3c standards conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-w3c-16","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["w3c","html","standards","quality","cache-freshness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(html.length>0?'ok':'empty'))\" # group:w3c check:16","humanCommand":"Validate markup with validator.w3.org and check semantic landmarks; review the cache-freshness evidence dimension for W3C Standards Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-w3c-17","testId":"ni-w3c-17","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C Standards Conformance: Route Reliability","description":"Validates route reliability, redirect safety, and dead-link risk for w3c standards, semantic validity, and interoperable markup behavior. Evidence should include status, redirect, and sitemap evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C Standards Conformance: Route Reliability appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the route reliability evidence for w3c standards conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-w3c-17","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["w3c","html","standards","quality","route-reliability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(html.length>0?'ok':'empty'))\" # group:w3c check:17","humanCommand":"Validate markup with validator.w3.org and check semantic landmarks; review the route-reliability evidence dimension for W3C Standards Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-w3c-18","testId":"ni-w3c-18","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C Standards Conformance: Feed Quality","description":"Validates RSS/Atom/feed usefulness, parseability, and freshness for w3c standards, semantic validity, and interoperable markup behavior. Evidence should include feed XML and item evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C Standards Conformance: Feed Quality appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the feed quality evidence for w3c standards conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-w3c-18","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["w3c","html","standards","quality","feed-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(html.length>0?'ok':'empty'))\" # group:w3c check:18","humanCommand":"Validate markup with validator.w3.org and check semantic landmarks; review the feed-quality evidence dimension for W3C Standards Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-w3c-19","testId":"ni-w3c-19","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C Standards Conformance: Sitemap Quality","description":"Validates sitemap validity, public-safe URL coverage, and no-dead-link policy for w3c standards, semantic validity, and interoperable markup behavior. Evidence should include sitemap XML and bounded link-check evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C Standards Conformance: Sitemap Quality appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the sitemap quality evidence for w3c standards conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-w3c-19","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["w3c","html","standards","quality","sitemap-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(html.length>0?'ok':'empty'))\" # group:w3c check:19","humanCommand":"Validate markup with validator.w3.org and check semantic landmarks; review the sitemap-quality evidence dimension for W3C Standards Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-w3c-20","testId":"ni-w3c-20","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C Standards Conformance: Robots Alignment","description":"Validates robots.txt alignment with public/protected policy and sitemap discovery for w3c standards, semantic validity, and interoperable markup behavior. Evidence should include robots directives and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C Standards Conformance: Robots Alignment appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the robots alignment evidence for w3c standards conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-w3c-20","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["w3c","html","standards","quality","robots-alignment","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(html.length>0?'ok':'empty'))\" # group:w3c check:20","humanCommand":"Validate markup with validator.w3.org and check semantic landmarks; review the robots-alignment evidence dimension for W3C Standards Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-w3c-21","testId":"ni-w3c-21","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C Standards Conformance: Llms Structure","description":"Validates llms.txt structure, readability, endpoint coverage, and agent usefulness for w3c standards, semantic validity, and interoperable markup behavior. Evidence should include plain-text section and line-length evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C Standards Conformance: Llms Structure appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms structure evidence for w3c standards conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-w3c-21","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["w3c","html","standards","quality","llms-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(html.length>0?'ok':'empty'))\" # group:w3c check:21","humanCommand":"Validate markup with validator.w3.org and check semantic landmarks; review the llms-structure evidence dimension for W3C Standards Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-w3c-22","testId":"ni-w3c-22","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C Standards Conformance: Llms Index Schema","description":"Validates llms-index JSON schema shape and count reconciliation for w3c standards, semantic validity, and interoperable markup behavior. Evidence should include JSON keys, counts, and endpoint evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C Standards Conformance: Llms Index Schema appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms index schema evidence for w3c standards conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-w3c-22","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["w3c","html","standards","quality","llms-index-schema","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(html.length>0?'ok':'empty'))\" # group:w3c check:22","humanCommand":"Validate markup with validator.w3.org and check semantic landmarks; review the llms-index-schema evidence dimension for W3C Standards Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-w3c-23","testId":"ni-w3c-23","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C Standards Conformance: Humans Attribution","description":"Validates humans.txt attribution, maintainer, technology, and governance transparency for w3c standards, semantic validity, and interoperable markup behavior. Evidence should include humans.txt section evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C Standards Conformance: Humans Attribution appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the humans attribution evidence for w3c standards conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-w3c-23","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["w3c","html","standards","quality","humans-attribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(html.length>0?'ok':'empty'))\" # group:w3c check:23","humanCommand":"Validate markup with validator.w3.org and check semantic landmarks; review the humans-attribution evidence dimension for W3C Standards Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-w3c-24","testId":"ni-w3c-24","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C Standards Conformance: Agent Policy","description":"Validates agent-policy JSON clarity for allowed, disallowed, and protected operations for w3c standards, semantic validity, and interoperable markup behavior. Evidence should include well-known policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C Standards Conformance: Agent Policy appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the agent policy evidence for w3c standards conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-w3c-24","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["w3c","html","standards","quality","agent-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(html.length>0?'ok':'empty'))\" # group:w3c check:24","humanCommand":"Validate markup with validator.w3.org and check semantic landmarks; review the agent-policy evidence dimension for W3C Standards Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-w3c-25","testId":"ni-w3c-25","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C Standards Conformance: Ai Policy","description":"Validates AI policy clarity for training, search, answer use, caching, and attribution for w3c standards, semantic validity, and interoperable markup behavior. Evidence should include well-known AI policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C Standards Conformance: Ai Policy appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ai policy evidence for w3c standards conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-w3c-25","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["w3c","html","standards","quality","ai-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(html.length>0?'ok':'empty'))\" # group:w3c check:25","humanCommand":"Validate markup with validator.w3.org and check semantic landmarks; review the ai-policy evidence dimension for W3C Standards Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-w3c-26","testId":"ni-w3c-26","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C Standards Conformance: Trust Policy","description":"Validates trust policy coverage for privacy, traceability, metadata, and protected actions for w3c standards, semantic validity, and interoperable markup behavior. Evidence should include trust.json evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C Standards Conformance: Trust Policy appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the trust policy evidence for w3c standards conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-w3c-26","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["w3c","html","standards","quality","trust-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(html.length>0?'ok':'empty'))\" # group:w3c check:26","humanCommand":"Validate markup with validator.w3.org and check semantic landmarks; review the trust-policy evidence dimension for W3C Standards Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-w3c-27","testId":"ni-w3c-27","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C Standards Conformance: Openapi Contract","description":"Validates OpenAPI availability, server URL accuracy, schemas, and auth policy for w3c standards, semantic validity, and interoperable markup behavior. Evidence should include OpenAPI text/JSON evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C Standards Conformance: Openapi Contract appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the openapi contract evidence for w3c standards conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-w3c-27","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["w3c","html","standards","quality","openapi-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(html.length>0?'ok':'empty'))\" # group:w3c check:27","humanCommand":"Validate markup with validator.w3.org and check semantic landmarks; review the openapi-contract evidence dimension for W3C Standards Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-w3c-28","testId":"ni-w3c-28","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C Standards Conformance: Mcp Contract","description":"Validates MCP JSON-RPC introspection, real tools, resources, and protected boundaries for w3c standards, semantic validity, and interoperable markup behavior. Evidence should include MCP manifest and initialize evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C Standards Conformance: Mcp Contract appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the mcp contract evidence for w3c standards conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-w3c-28","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["w3c","html","standards","quality","mcp-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(html.length>0?'ok':'empty'))\" # group:w3c check:28","humanCommand":"Validate markup with validator.w3.org and check semantic landmarks; review the mcp-contract evidence dimension for W3C Standards Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-w3c-29","testId":"ni-w3c-29","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C Standards Conformance: Api Error Shape","description":"Validates API success/error response shape consistency for w3c standards, semantic validity, and interoperable markup behavior. Evidence should include REST envelope evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C Standards Conformance: Api Error Shape appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the api error shape evidence for w3c standards conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-w3c-29","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["w3c","html","standards","quality","api-error-shape","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(html.length>0?'ok':'empty'))\" # group:w3c check:29","humanCommand":"Validate markup with validator.w3.org and check semantic landmarks; review the api-error-shape evidence dimension for W3C Standards Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-w3c-30","testId":"ni-w3c-30","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C Standards Conformance: Traceability","description":"Validates trace propagation, request IDs, and safe observability correlation for w3c standards, semantic validity, and interoperable markup behavior. Evidence should include trace header and metadata evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C Standards Conformance: Traceability appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the traceability evidence for w3c standards conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-w3c-30","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["w3c","html","standards","quality","traceability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(html.length>0?'ok':'empty'))\" # group:w3c check:30","humanCommand":"Validate markup with validator.w3.org and check semantic landmarks; review the traceability evidence dimension for W3C Standards Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-w3c-31","testId":"ni-w3c-31","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C Standards Conformance: Ja4 Redaction","description":"Validates fingerprint-adjacent metadata redaction and non-public raw JA4 handling for w3c standards, semantic validity, and interoperable markup behavior. Evidence should include metadata policy and redaction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C Standards Conformance: Ja4 Redaction appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the ja4 redaction evidence for w3c standards conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-w3c-31","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["w3c","html","standards","quality","ja4-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(html.length>0?'ok':'empty'))\" # group:w3c check:31","humanCommand":"Validate markup with validator.w3.org and check semantic landmarks; review the ja4-redaction evidence dimension for W3C Standards Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-w3c-32","testId":"ni-w3c-32","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C Standards Conformance: Secret Redaction","description":"Validates absence of secrets, generic key examples, cookies, and raw tokens in public outputs for w3c standards, semantic validity, and interoperable markup behavior. Evidence should include public artifact scan evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C Standards Conformance: Secret Redaction appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the secret redaction evidence for w3c standards conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-w3c-32","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["w3c","html","standards","quality","secret-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(html.length>0?'ok':'empty'))\" # group:w3c check:32","humanCommand":"Validate markup with validator.w3.org and check semantic landmarks; review the secret-redaction evidence dimension for W3C Standards Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-w3c-33","testId":"ni-w3c-33","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C Standards Conformance: Security Headers","description":"Validates security header coverage and hardened transport signals for w3c standards, semantic validity, and interoperable markup behavior. Evidence should include HTTP header evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C Standards Conformance: Security Headers appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the security headers evidence for w3c standards conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-w3c-33","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["w3c","html","standards","quality","security-headers","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(html.length>0?'ok':'empty'))\" # group:w3c check:33","humanCommand":"Validate markup with validator.w3.org and check semantic landmarks; review the security-headers evidence dimension for W3C Standards Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-w3c-34","testId":"ni-w3c-34","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C Standards Conformance: Privacy Consent","description":"Validates privacy policy, consent, attribution, and data-use disclosure quality for w3c standards, semantic validity, and interoperable markup behavior. Evidence should include public page and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C Standards Conformance: Privacy Consent appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the privacy consent evidence for w3c standards conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-w3c-34","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["w3c","html","standards","quality","privacy-consent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(html.length>0?'ok':'empty'))\" # group:w3c check:34","humanCommand":"Validate markup with validator.w3.org and check semantic landmarks; review the privacy-consent evidence dimension for W3C Standards Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-w3c-35","testId":"ni-w3c-35","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C Standards Conformance: Structured Data","description":"Validates JSON-LD and entity modeling for machine interpretation for w3c standards, semantic validity, and interoperable markup behavior. Evidence should include schema block and parse evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C Standards Conformance: Structured Data appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the structured data evidence for w3c standards conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-w3c-35","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["w3c","html","standards","quality","structured-data","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(html.length>0?'ok':'empty'))\" # group:w3c check:35","humanCommand":"Validate markup with validator.w3.org and check semantic landmarks; review the structured-data evidence dimension for W3C Standards Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-w3c-36","testId":"ni-w3c-36","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C Standards Conformance: Social Preview","description":"Validates Open Graph and Twitter/X card readiness for public sharing for w3c standards, semantic validity, and interoperable markup behavior. Evidence should include meta tag evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C Standards Conformance: Social Preview appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the social preview evidence for w3c standards conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-w3c-36","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["w3c","html","standards","quality","social-preview","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(html.length>0?'ok':'empty'))\" # group:w3c check:36","humanCommand":"Validate markup with validator.w3.org and check semantic landmarks; review the social-preview evidence dimension for W3C Standards Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-w3c-37","testId":"ni-w3c-37","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C Standards Conformance: I18n Routing","description":"Validates locale route, hreflang, language declaration, and translation readiness for w3c standards, semantic validity, and interoperable markup behavior. Evidence should include lang/hreflang and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C Standards Conformance: I18n Routing appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the i18n routing evidence for w3c standards conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-w3c-37","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["w3c","html","standards","quality","i18n-routing","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(html.length>0?'ok':'empty'))\" # group:w3c check:37","humanCommand":"Validate markup with validator.w3.org and check semantic landmarks; review the i18n-routing evidence dimension for W3C Standards Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-w3c-38","testId":"ni-w3c-38","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C Standards Conformance: Readability","description":"Validates human readability, sectioning, sentence complexity, and comprehension support for w3c standards, semantic validity, and interoperable markup behavior. Evidence should include extracted content evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C Standards Conformance: Readability appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the readability evidence for w3c standards conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-w3c-38","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["w3c","html","standards","quality","readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(html.length>0?'ok':'empty'))\" # group:w3c check:38","humanCommand":"Validate markup with validator.w3.org and check semantic landmarks; review the readability evidence dimension for W3C Standards Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-w3c-39","testId":"ni-w3c-39","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C Standards Conformance: Content Utility","description":"Validates non-placeholder content usefulness and domain-specific public value for w3c standards, semantic validity, and interoperable markup behavior. Evidence should include content extraction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C Standards Conformance: Content Utility appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the content utility evidence for w3c standards conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-w3c-39","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["w3c","html","standards","quality","content-utility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(html.length>0?'ok':'empty'))\" # group:w3c check:39","humanCommand":"Validate markup with validator.w3.org and check semantic landmarks; review the content-utility evidence dimension for W3C Standards Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-w3c-40","testId":"ni-w3c-40","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C Standards Conformance: Recommendation Grounding","description":"Validates recommendation grounding in deterministic evidence instead of fabricated model output for w3c standards, semantic validity, and interoperable markup behavior. Evidence should include issue and remediation evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C Standards Conformance: Recommendation Grounding appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the recommendation grounding evidence for w3c standards conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-w3c-40","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["w3c","html","standards","quality","recommendation-grounding","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(html.length>0?'ok':'empty'))\" # group:w3c check:40","humanCommand":"Validate markup with validator.w3.org and check semantic landmarks; review the recommendation-grounding evidence dimension for W3C Standards Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-w3c-41","testId":"ni-w3c-41","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C Standards Conformance: Evidence Quality","description":"Validates evidence completeness, public safety, and reproducibility for w3c standards, semantic validity, and interoperable markup behavior. Evidence should include test output and artifact evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C Standards Conformance: Evidence Quality appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the evidence quality evidence for w3c standards conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-w3c-41","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["w3c","html","standards","quality","evidence-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(html.length>0?'ok':'empty'))\" # group:w3c check:41","humanCommand":"Validate markup with validator.w3.org and check semantic landmarks; review the evidence-quality evidence dimension for W3C Standards Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-w3c-42","testId":"ni-w3c-42","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C Standards Conformance: Threshold Policy","description":"Validates threshold clarity, pass/warn/fail semantics, and scoring transparency for w3c standards, semantic validity, and interoperable markup behavior. Evidence should include threshold and result status evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C Standards Conformance: Threshold Policy appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the threshold policy evidence for w3c standards conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-w3c-42","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["w3c","html","standards","quality","threshold-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(html.length>0?'ok':'empty'))\" # group:w3c check:42","humanCommand":"Validate markup with validator.w3.org and check semantic landmarks; review the threshold-policy evidence dimension for W3C Standards Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-w3c-43","testId":"ni-w3c-43","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C Standards Conformance: Confidence","description":"Validates confidence scoring and degraded-input disclosure for w3c standards, semantic validity, and interoperable markup behavior. Evidence should include source freshness and input availability evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C Standards Conformance: Confidence appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the confidence evidence for w3c standards conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-w3c-43","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["w3c","html","standards","quality","confidence","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(html.length>0?'ok':'empty'))\" # group:w3c check:43","humanCommand":"Validate markup with validator.w3.org and check semantic landmarks; review the confidence evidence dimension for W3C Standards Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-w3c-44","testId":"ni-w3c-44","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C Standards Conformance: Trend Readiness","description":"Validates historical comparability and timeline readiness for future reruns for w3c standards, semantic validity, and interoperable markup behavior. Evidence should include analysis ID, timestamp, and persistence evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C Standards Conformance: Trend Readiness appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the trend readiness evidence for w3c standards conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-w3c-44","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["w3c","html","standards","quality","trend-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(html.length>0?'ok':'empty'))\" # group:w3c check:44","humanCommand":"Validate markup with validator.w3.org and check semantic landmarks; review the trend-readiness evidence dimension for W3C Standards Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-w3c-45","testId":"ni-w3c-45","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C Standards Conformance: Ranking Readiness","description":"Validates ranking input completeness and profile compatibility for w3c standards, semantic validity, and interoperable markup behavior. Evidence should include score and profile evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C Standards Conformance: Ranking Readiness appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ranking readiness evidence for w3c standards conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-w3c-45","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["w3c","html","standards","quality","ranking-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(html.length>0?'ok':'empty'))\" # group:w3c check:45","humanCommand":"Validate markup with validator.w3.org and check semantic landmarks; review the ranking-readiness evidence dimension for W3C Standards Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-w3c-46","testId":"ni-w3c-46","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C Standards Conformance: Network Contribution","description":"Validates PlatPhorm network contribution through discovery, integrations, and standards compliance for w3c standards, semantic validity, and interoperable markup behavior. Evidence should include network graph and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C Standards Conformance: Network Contribution appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the network contribution evidence for w3c standards conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-w3c-46","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["w3c","html","standards","quality","network-contribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(html.length>0?'ok':'empty'))\" # group:w3c check:46","humanCommand":"Validate markup with validator.w3.org and check semantic landmarks; review the network-contribution evidence dimension for W3C Standards Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-w3c-47","testId":"ni-w3c-47","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C Standards Conformance: Report Readiness","description":"Validates report/export categorization with public-safe evidence and protected boundaries for w3c standards, semantic validity, and interoperable markup behavior. Evidence should include report section mapping evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C Standards Conformance: Report Readiness appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the report readiness evidence for w3c standards conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-w3c-47","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["w3c","html","standards","quality","report-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(html.length>0?'ok':'empty'))\" # group:w3c check:47","humanCommand":"Validate markup with validator.w3.org and check semantic landmarks; review the report-readiness evidence dimension for W3C Standards Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-w3c-48","testId":"ni-w3c-48","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C Standards Conformance: Operator Actionability","description":"Validates clear remediation, owner action, difficulty, and retest path for w3c standards, semantic validity, and interoperable markup behavior. Evidence should include fix instructions and command evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C Standards Conformance: Operator Actionability appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the operator actionability evidence for w3c standards conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-w3c-48","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["w3c","html","standards","quality","operator-actionability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(html.length>0?'ok':'empty'))\" # group:w3c check:48","humanCommand":"Validate markup with validator.w3.org and check semantic landmarks; review the operator-actionability evidence dimension for W3C Standards Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-w3c-49","testId":"ni-w3c-49","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C Standards Conformance: Degraded State","description":"Validates honest degraded, unavailable, skipped, and not-applicable states for w3c standards, semantic validity, and interoperable markup behavior. Evidence should include status and storage evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C Standards Conformance: Degraded State appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the degraded state evidence for w3c standards conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-w3c-49","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["w3c","html","standards","quality","degraded-state","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(html.length>0?'ok':'empty'))\" # group:w3c check:49","humanCommand":"Validate markup with validator.w3.org and check semantic landmarks; review the degraded-state evidence dimension for W3C Standards Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-w3c-50","testId":"ni-w3c-50","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C Standards Conformance: Reproducibility","description":"Validates stable CLI/API/human reproduction path and deterministic rerun instructions for w3c standards, semantic validity, and interoperable markup behavior. Evidence should include commands and registry version evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C Standards Conformance: Reproducibility appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the reproducibility evidence for w3c standards conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-w3c-50","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["w3c","html","standards","quality","reproducibility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(html.length>0?'ok':'empty'))\" # group:w3c check:50","humanCommand":"Validate markup with validator.w3.org and check semantic landmarks; review the reproducibility evidence dimension for W3C Standards Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-a11y-01","testId":"ni-a11y-01","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessibility Standards: Availability","description":"Validates public route availability and successful bounded fetch behavior for accessibility compliance, assistive technology support, and inclusive UX. Evidence should include HTTP status, timeout, and redirect evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessibility Standards: Availability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the availability evidence for accessibility standards, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-a11y-01","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag","inclusive-design","quality","availability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:a11y check:1","humanCommand":"Run keyboard-only and screen-reader checks for core journeys; review the availability evidence dimension for Accessibility Standards"}},{"id":"ni-a11y-02","testId":"ni-a11y-02","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessibility Standards: Public Safety","description":"Validates public-safe access boundaries without exposing private or protected data for accessibility compliance, assistive technology support, and inclusive UX. Evidence should include route policy and response-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessibility Standards: Public Safety appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the public safety evidence for accessibility standards, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-a11y-02","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag","inclusive-design","quality","public-safety","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:a11y check:2","humanCommand":"Run keyboard-only and screen-reader checks for core journeys; review the public-safety evidence dimension for Accessibility Standards"}},{"id":"ni-a11y-03","testId":"ni-a11y-03","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessibility Standards: Canonical Url","description":"Validates canonical URL stability and normalized route identity for accessibility compliance, assistive technology support, and inclusive UX. Evidence should include canonical tags, redirects, and normalized URL evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessibility Standards: Canonical Url appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the canonical url evidence for accessibility standards, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-a11y-03","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag","inclusive-design","quality","canonical-url","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:a11y check:3","humanCommand":"Run keyboard-only and screen-reader checks for core journeys; review the canonical-url evidence dimension for Accessibility Standards"}},{"id":"ni-a11y-04","testId":"ni-a11y-04","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessibility Standards: Metadata Clarity","description":"Validates title, description, and page-specific metadata clarity for accessibility compliance, assistive technology support, and inclusive UX. Evidence should include HTML metadata and extracted text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessibility Standards: Metadata Clarity appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the metadata clarity evidence for accessibility standards, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-a11y-04","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag","inclusive-design","quality","metadata-clarity","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:a11y check:4","humanCommand":"Run keyboard-only and screen-reader checks for core journeys; review the metadata-clarity evidence dimension for Accessibility Standards"}},{"id":"ni-a11y-05","testId":"ni-a11y-05","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessibility Standards: Semantic Structure","description":"Validates semantic HTML structure for humans, agents, and assistive technology for accessibility compliance, assistive technology support, and inclusive UX. Evidence should include heading, landmark, and element evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessibility Standards: Semantic Structure appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the semantic structure evidence for accessibility standards, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-a11y-05","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag","inclusive-design","quality","semantic-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:a11y check:5","humanCommand":"Run keyboard-only and screen-reader checks for core journeys; review the semantic-structure evidence dimension for Accessibility Standards"}},{"id":"ni-a11y-06","testId":"ni-a11y-06","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessibility Standards: Machine Readability","description":"Validates machine-readable public content and predictable parsing surfaces for accessibility compliance, assistive technology support, and inclusive UX. Evidence should include structured tags, JSON-LD, and document-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessibility Standards: Machine Readability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the machine readability evidence for accessibility standards, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-a11y-06","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag","inclusive-design","quality","machine-readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:a11y check:6","humanCommand":"Run keyboard-only and screen-reader checks for core journeys; review the machine-readability evidence dimension for Accessibility Standards"}},{"id":"ni-a11y-07","testId":"ni-a11y-07","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessibility Standards: Agent Discovery","description":"Validates agent discovery hints and AI-readable policy/documentation signals for accessibility compliance, assistive technology support, and inclusive UX. Evidence should include llms, policy, MCP, OpenAPI, or schema evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessibility Standards: Agent Discovery appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the agent discovery evidence for accessibility standards, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-a11y-07","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag","inclusive-design","quality","agent-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:a11y check:7","humanCommand":"Run keyboard-only and screen-reader checks for core journeys; review the agent-discovery evidence dimension for Accessibility Standards"}},{"id":"ni-a11y-08","testId":"ni-a11y-08","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessibility Standards: Crawler Discovery","description":"Validates crawler discovery paths through robots, sitemap, feeds, and canonical links for accessibility compliance, assistive technology support, and inclusive UX. Evidence should include discovery artifact and link evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessibility Standards: Crawler Discovery appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the crawler discovery evidence for accessibility standards, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-a11y-08","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag","inclusive-design","quality","crawler-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:a11y check:8","humanCommand":"Run keyboard-only and screen-reader checks for core journeys; review the crawler-discovery evidence dimension for Accessibility Standards"}},{"id":"ni-a11y-09","testId":"ni-a11y-09","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessibility Standards: Answerability","description":"Validates direct answer extraction and quotable explanatory content for accessibility compliance, assistive technology support, and inclusive UX. Evidence should include question, summary, heading, and paragraph evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessibility Standards: Answerability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the answerability evidence for accessibility standards, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-a11y-09","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag","inclusive-design","quality","answerability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:a11y check:9","humanCommand":"Run keyboard-only and screen-reader checks for core journeys; review the answerability evidence dimension for Accessibility Standards"}},{"id":"ni-a11y-10","testId":"ni-a11y-10","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessibility Standards: Generative Context","description":"Validates GEO context quality for generative engines without inventing measured facts for accessibility compliance, assistive technology support, and inclusive UX. Evidence should include entity, source, and instruction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessibility Standards: Generative Context appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the generative context evidence for accessibility standards, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-a11y-10","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag","inclusive-design","quality","generative-context","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:a11y check:10","humanCommand":"Run keyboard-only and screen-reader checks for core journeys; review the generative-context evidence dimension for Accessibility Standards"}},{"id":"ni-a11y-11","testId":"ni-a11y-11","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessibility Standards: Search Intent","description":"Validates search intent alignment and snippet-friendly content structure for accessibility compliance, assistive technology support, and inclusive UX. Evidence should include metadata, headings, and topical text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessibility Standards: Search Intent appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the search intent evidence for accessibility standards, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-a11y-11","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag","inclusive-design","quality","search-intent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:a11y check:11","humanCommand":"Run keyboard-only and screen-reader checks for core journeys; review the search-intent evidence dimension for Accessibility Standards"}},{"id":"ni-a11y-12","testId":"ni-a11y-12","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessibility Standards: Accessibility Semantics","description":"Validates accessible names, relationships, landmarks, and keyboard-relevant structure for accessibility compliance, assistive technology support, and inclusive UX. Evidence should include ARIA, labels, landmarks, and control evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessibility Standards: Accessibility Semantics appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the accessibility semantics evidence for accessibility standards, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-a11y-12","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag","inclusive-design","quality","accessibility-semantics","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:a11y check:12","humanCommand":"Run keyboard-only and screen-reader checks for core journeys; review the accessibility-semantics evidence dimension for Accessibility Standards"}},{"id":"ni-a11y-13","testId":"ni-a11y-13","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessibility Standards: Mobile Readiness","description":"Validates mobile viewport, responsive content, and touch-friendly layout signals for accessibility compliance, assistive technology support, and inclusive UX. Evidence should include viewport and responsive asset evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessibility Standards: Mobile Readiness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the mobile readiness evidence for accessibility standards, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-a11y-13","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag","inclusive-design","quality","mobile-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:a11y check:13","humanCommand":"Run keyboard-only and screen-reader checks for core journeys; review the mobile-readiness evidence dimension for Accessibility Standards"}},{"id":"ni-a11y-14","testId":"ni-a11y-14","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessibility Standards: Performance Budget","description":"Validates performance budget compliance using measured or bounded deterministic inputs for accessibility compliance, assistive technology support, and inclusive UX. Evidence should include timing, byte, and Lighthouse-derived evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessibility Standards: Performance Budget appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the performance budget evidence for accessibility standards, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-a11y-14","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag","inclusive-design","quality","performance-budget","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:a11y check:14","humanCommand":"Run keyboard-only and screen-reader checks for core journeys; review the performance-budget evidence dimension for Accessibility Standards"}},{"id":"ni-a11y-15","testId":"ni-a11y-15","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessibility Standards: Resource Efficiency","description":"Validates resource size, script/style count, and optimization opportunity signals for accessibility compliance, assistive technology support, and inclusive UX. Evidence should include resource and markup evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessibility Standards: Resource Efficiency appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the resource efficiency evidence for accessibility standards, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-a11y-15","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag","inclusive-design","quality","resource-efficiency","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:a11y check:15","humanCommand":"Run keyboard-only and screen-reader checks for core journeys; review the resource-efficiency evidence dimension for Accessibility Standards"}},{"id":"ni-a11y-16","testId":"ni-a11y-16","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessibility Standards: Cache Freshness","description":"Validates cache behavior, freshness hints, and stale-content risk for accessibility compliance, assistive technology support, and inclusive UX. Evidence should include HTTP cache and timestamp evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessibility Standards: Cache Freshness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the cache freshness evidence for accessibility standards, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-a11y-16","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag","inclusive-design","quality","cache-freshness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:a11y check:16","humanCommand":"Run keyboard-only and screen-reader checks for core journeys; review the cache-freshness evidence dimension for Accessibility Standards"}},{"id":"ni-a11y-17","testId":"ni-a11y-17","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessibility Standards: Route Reliability","description":"Validates route reliability, redirect safety, and dead-link risk for accessibility compliance, assistive technology support, and inclusive UX. Evidence should include status, redirect, and sitemap evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessibility Standards: Route Reliability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the route reliability evidence for accessibility standards, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-a11y-17","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag","inclusive-design","quality","route-reliability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:a11y check:17","humanCommand":"Run keyboard-only and screen-reader checks for core journeys; review the route-reliability evidence dimension for Accessibility Standards"}},{"id":"ni-a11y-18","testId":"ni-a11y-18","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessibility Standards: Feed Quality","description":"Validates RSS/Atom/feed usefulness, parseability, and freshness for accessibility compliance, assistive technology support, and inclusive UX. Evidence should include feed XML and item evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessibility Standards: Feed Quality appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the feed quality evidence for accessibility standards, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-a11y-18","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag","inclusive-design","quality","feed-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:a11y check:18","humanCommand":"Run keyboard-only and screen-reader checks for core journeys; review the feed-quality evidence dimension for Accessibility Standards"}},{"id":"ni-a11y-19","testId":"ni-a11y-19","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessibility Standards: Sitemap Quality","description":"Validates sitemap validity, public-safe URL coverage, and no-dead-link policy for accessibility compliance, assistive technology support, and inclusive UX. Evidence should include sitemap XML and bounded link-check evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessibility Standards: Sitemap Quality appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the sitemap quality evidence for accessibility standards, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-a11y-19","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag","inclusive-design","quality","sitemap-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:a11y check:19","humanCommand":"Run keyboard-only and screen-reader checks for core journeys; review the sitemap-quality evidence dimension for Accessibility Standards"}},{"id":"ni-a11y-20","testId":"ni-a11y-20","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessibility Standards: Robots Alignment","description":"Validates robots.txt alignment with public/protected policy and sitemap discovery for accessibility compliance, assistive technology support, and inclusive UX. Evidence should include robots directives and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessibility Standards: Robots Alignment appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the robots alignment evidence for accessibility standards, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-a11y-20","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag","inclusive-design","quality","robots-alignment","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:a11y check:20","humanCommand":"Run keyboard-only and screen-reader checks for core journeys; review the robots-alignment evidence dimension for Accessibility Standards"}},{"id":"ni-a11y-21","testId":"ni-a11y-21","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessibility Standards: Llms Structure","description":"Validates llms.txt structure, readability, endpoint coverage, and agent usefulness for accessibility compliance, assistive technology support, and inclusive UX. Evidence should include plain-text section and line-length evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessibility Standards: Llms Structure appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms structure evidence for accessibility standards, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-a11y-21","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag","inclusive-design","quality","llms-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:a11y check:21","humanCommand":"Run keyboard-only and screen-reader checks for core journeys; review the llms-structure evidence dimension for Accessibility Standards"}},{"id":"ni-a11y-22","testId":"ni-a11y-22","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessibility Standards: Llms Index Schema","description":"Validates llms-index JSON schema shape and count reconciliation for accessibility compliance, assistive technology support, and inclusive UX. Evidence should include JSON keys, counts, and endpoint evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessibility Standards: Llms Index Schema appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms index schema evidence for accessibility standards, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-a11y-22","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag","inclusive-design","quality","llms-index-schema","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:a11y check:22","humanCommand":"Run keyboard-only and screen-reader checks for core journeys; review the llms-index-schema evidence dimension for Accessibility Standards"}},{"id":"ni-a11y-23","testId":"ni-a11y-23","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessibility Standards: Humans Attribution","description":"Validates humans.txt attribution, maintainer, technology, and governance transparency for accessibility compliance, assistive technology support, and inclusive UX. Evidence should include humans.txt section evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessibility Standards: Humans Attribution appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the humans attribution evidence for accessibility standards, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-a11y-23","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag","inclusive-design","quality","humans-attribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:a11y check:23","humanCommand":"Run keyboard-only and screen-reader checks for core journeys; review the humans-attribution evidence dimension for Accessibility Standards"}},{"id":"ni-a11y-24","testId":"ni-a11y-24","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessibility Standards: Agent Policy","description":"Validates agent-policy JSON clarity for allowed, disallowed, and protected operations for accessibility compliance, assistive technology support, and inclusive UX. Evidence should include well-known policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessibility Standards: Agent Policy appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the agent policy evidence for accessibility standards, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-a11y-24","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag","inclusive-design","quality","agent-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:a11y check:24","humanCommand":"Run keyboard-only and screen-reader checks for core journeys; review the agent-policy evidence dimension for Accessibility Standards"}},{"id":"ni-a11y-25","testId":"ni-a11y-25","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessibility Standards: Ai Policy","description":"Validates AI policy clarity for training, search, answer use, caching, and attribution for accessibility compliance, assistive technology support, and inclusive UX. Evidence should include well-known AI policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessibility Standards: Ai Policy appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ai policy evidence for accessibility standards, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-a11y-25","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag","inclusive-design","quality","ai-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:a11y check:25","humanCommand":"Run keyboard-only and screen-reader checks for core journeys; review the ai-policy evidence dimension for Accessibility Standards"}},{"id":"ni-a11y-26","testId":"ni-a11y-26","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessibility Standards: Trust Policy","description":"Validates trust policy coverage for privacy, traceability, metadata, and protected actions for accessibility compliance, assistive technology support, and inclusive UX. Evidence should include trust.json evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessibility Standards: Trust Policy appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the trust policy evidence for accessibility standards, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-a11y-26","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag","inclusive-design","quality","trust-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:a11y check:26","humanCommand":"Run keyboard-only and screen-reader checks for core journeys; review the trust-policy evidence dimension for Accessibility Standards"}},{"id":"ni-a11y-27","testId":"ni-a11y-27","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessibility Standards: Openapi Contract","description":"Validates OpenAPI availability, server URL accuracy, schemas, and auth policy for accessibility compliance, assistive technology support, and inclusive UX. Evidence should include OpenAPI text/JSON evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessibility Standards: Openapi Contract appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the openapi contract evidence for accessibility standards, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-a11y-27","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag","inclusive-design","quality","openapi-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:a11y check:27","humanCommand":"Run keyboard-only and screen-reader checks for core journeys; review the openapi-contract evidence dimension for Accessibility Standards"}},{"id":"ni-a11y-28","testId":"ni-a11y-28","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessibility Standards: Mcp Contract","description":"Validates MCP JSON-RPC introspection, real tools, resources, and protected boundaries for accessibility compliance, assistive technology support, and inclusive UX. Evidence should include MCP manifest and initialize evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessibility Standards: Mcp Contract appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the mcp contract evidence for accessibility standards, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-a11y-28","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag","inclusive-design","quality","mcp-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:a11y check:28","humanCommand":"Run keyboard-only and screen-reader checks for core journeys; review the mcp-contract evidence dimension for Accessibility Standards"}},{"id":"ni-a11y-29","testId":"ni-a11y-29","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessibility Standards: Api Error Shape","description":"Validates API success/error response shape consistency for accessibility compliance, assistive technology support, and inclusive UX. Evidence should include REST envelope evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessibility Standards: Api Error Shape appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the api error shape evidence for accessibility standards, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-a11y-29","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag","inclusive-design","quality","api-error-shape","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:a11y check:29","humanCommand":"Run keyboard-only and screen-reader checks for core journeys; review the api-error-shape evidence dimension for Accessibility Standards"}},{"id":"ni-a11y-30","testId":"ni-a11y-30","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessibility Standards: Traceability","description":"Validates trace propagation, request IDs, and safe observability correlation for accessibility compliance, assistive technology support, and inclusive UX. Evidence should include trace header and metadata evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessibility Standards: Traceability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the traceability evidence for accessibility standards, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-a11y-30","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag","inclusive-design","quality","traceability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:a11y check:30","humanCommand":"Run keyboard-only and screen-reader checks for core journeys; review the traceability evidence dimension for Accessibility Standards"}},{"id":"ni-a11y-31","testId":"ni-a11y-31","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessibility Standards: Ja4 Redaction","description":"Validates fingerprint-adjacent metadata redaction and non-public raw JA4 handling for accessibility compliance, assistive technology support, and inclusive UX. Evidence should include metadata policy and redaction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessibility Standards: Ja4 Redaction appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the ja4 redaction evidence for accessibility standards, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-a11y-31","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag","inclusive-design","quality","ja4-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:a11y check:31","humanCommand":"Run keyboard-only and screen-reader checks for core journeys; review the ja4-redaction evidence dimension for Accessibility Standards"}},{"id":"ni-a11y-32","testId":"ni-a11y-32","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessibility Standards: Secret Redaction","description":"Validates absence of secrets, generic key examples, cookies, and raw tokens in public outputs for accessibility compliance, assistive technology support, and inclusive UX. Evidence should include public artifact scan evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessibility Standards: Secret Redaction appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the secret redaction evidence for accessibility standards, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-a11y-32","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag","inclusive-design","quality","secret-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:a11y check:32","humanCommand":"Run keyboard-only and screen-reader checks for core journeys; review the secret-redaction evidence dimension for Accessibility Standards"}},{"id":"ni-a11y-33","testId":"ni-a11y-33","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessibility Standards: Security Headers","description":"Validates security header coverage and hardened transport signals for accessibility compliance, assistive technology support, and inclusive UX. Evidence should include HTTP header evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessibility Standards: Security Headers appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the security headers evidence for accessibility standards, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-a11y-33","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag","inclusive-design","quality","security-headers","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:a11y check:33","humanCommand":"Run keyboard-only and screen-reader checks for core journeys; review the security-headers evidence dimension for Accessibility Standards"}},{"id":"ni-a11y-34","testId":"ni-a11y-34","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessibility Standards: Privacy Consent","description":"Validates privacy policy, consent, attribution, and data-use disclosure quality for accessibility compliance, assistive technology support, and inclusive UX. Evidence should include public page and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessibility Standards: Privacy Consent appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the privacy consent evidence for accessibility standards, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-a11y-34","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag","inclusive-design","quality","privacy-consent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:a11y check:34","humanCommand":"Run keyboard-only and screen-reader checks for core journeys; review the privacy-consent evidence dimension for Accessibility Standards"}},{"id":"ni-a11y-35","testId":"ni-a11y-35","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessibility Standards: Structured Data","description":"Validates JSON-LD and entity modeling for machine interpretation for accessibility compliance, assistive technology support, and inclusive UX. Evidence should include schema block and parse evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessibility Standards: Structured Data appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the structured data evidence for accessibility standards, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-a11y-35","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag","inclusive-design","quality","structured-data","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:a11y check:35","humanCommand":"Run keyboard-only and screen-reader checks for core journeys; review the structured-data evidence dimension for Accessibility Standards"}},{"id":"ni-a11y-36","testId":"ni-a11y-36","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessibility Standards: Social Preview","description":"Validates Open Graph and Twitter/X card readiness for public sharing for accessibility compliance, assistive technology support, and inclusive UX. Evidence should include meta tag evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessibility Standards: Social Preview appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the social preview evidence for accessibility standards, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-a11y-36","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag","inclusive-design","quality","social-preview","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:a11y check:36","humanCommand":"Run keyboard-only and screen-reader checks for core journeys; review the social-preview evidence dimension for Accessibility Standards"}},{"id":"ni-a11y-37","testId":"ni-a11y-37","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessibility Standards: I18n Routing","description":"Validates locale route, hreflang, language declaration, and translation readiness for accessibility compliance, assistive technology support, and inclusive UX. Evidence should include lang/hreflang and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessibility Standards: I18n Routing appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the i18n routing evidence for accessibility standards, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-a11y-37","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag","inclusive-design","quality","i18n-routing","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:a11y check:37","humanCommand":"Run keyboard-only and screen-reader checks for core journeys; review the i18n-routing evidence dimension for Accessibility Standards"}},{"id":"ni-a11y-38","testId":"ni-a11y-38","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessibility Standards: Readability","description":"Validates human readability, sectioning, sentence complexity, and comprehension support for accessibility compliance, assistive technology support, and inclusive UX. Evidence should include extracted content evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessibility Standards: Readability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the readability evidence for accessibility standards, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-a11y-38","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag","inclusive-design","quality","readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:a11y check:38","humanCommand":"Run keyboard-only and screen-reader checks for core journeys; review the readability evidence dimension for Accessibility Standards"}},{"id":"ni-a11y-39","testId":"ni-a11y-39","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessibility Standards: Content Utility","description":"Validates non-placeholder content usefulness and domain-specific public value for accessibility compliance, assistive technology support, and inclusive UX. Evidence should include content extraction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessibility Standards: Content Utility appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the content utility evidence for accessibility standards, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-a11y-39","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag","inclusive-design","quality","content-utility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:a11y check:39","humanCommand":"Run keyboard-only and screen-reader checks for core journeys; review the content-utility evidence dimension for Accessibility Standards"}},{"id":"ni-a11y-40","testId":"ni-a11y-40","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessibility Standards: Recommendation Grounding","description":"Validates recommendation grounding in deterministic evidence instead of fabricated model output for accessibility compliance, assistive technology support, and inclusive UX. Evidence should include issue and remediation evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessibility Standards: Recommendation Grounding appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the recommendation grounding evidence for accessibility standards, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-a11y-40","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag","inclusive-design","quality","recommendation-grounding","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:a11y check:40","humanCommand":"Run keyboard-only and screen-reader checks for core journeys; review the recommendation-grounding evidence dimension for Accessibility Standards"}},{"id":"ni-a11y-41","testId":"ni-a11y-41","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessibility Standards: Evidence Quality","description":"Validates evidence completeness, public safety, and reproducibility for accessibility compliance, assistive technology support, and inclusive UX. Evidence should include test output and artifact evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessibility Standards: Evidence Quality appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the evidence quality evidence for accessibility standards, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-a11y-41","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag","inclusive-design","quality","evidence-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:a11y check:41","humanCommand":"Run keyboard-only and screen-reader checks for core journeys; review the evidence-quality evidence dimension for Accessibility Standards"}},{"id":"ni-a11y-42","testId":"ni-a11y-42","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessibility Standards: Threshold Policy","description":"Validates threshold clarity, pass/warn/fail semantics, and scoring transparency for accessibility compliance, assistive technology support, and inclusive UX. Evidence should include threshold and result status evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessibility Standards: Threshold Policy appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the threshold policy evidence for accessibility standards, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-a11y-42","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag","inclusive-design","quality","threshold-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:a11y check:42","humanCommand":"Run keyboard-only and screen-reader checks for core journeys; review the threshold-policy evidence dimension for Accessibility Standards"}},{"id":"ni-a11y-43","testId":"ni-a11y-43","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessibility Standards: Confidence","description":"Validates confidence scoring and degraded-input disclosure for accessibility compliance, assistive technology support, and inclusive UX. Evidence should include source freshness and input availability evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessibility Standards: Confidence appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the confidence evidence for accessibility standards, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-a11y-43","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag","inclusive-design","quality","confidence","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:a11y check:43","humanCommand":"Run keyboard-only and screen-reader checks for core journeys; review the confidence evidence dimension for Accessibility Standards"}},{"id":"ni-a11y-44","testId":"ni-a11y-44","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessibility Standards: Trend Readiness","description":"Validates historical comparability and timeline readiness for future reruns for accessibility compliance, assistive technology support, and inclusive UX. Evidence should include analysis ID, timestamp, and persistence evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessibility Standards: Trend Readiness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the trend readiness evidence for accessibility standards, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-a11y-44","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag","inclusive-design","quality","trend-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:a11y check:44","humanCommand":"Run keyboard-only and screen-reader checks for core journeys; review the trend-readiness evidence dimension for Accessibility Standards"}},{"id":"ni-a11y-45","testId":"ni-a11y-45","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessibility Standards: Ranking Readiness","description":"Validates ranking input completeness and profile compatibility for accessibility compliance, assistive technology support, and inclusive UX. Evidence should include score and profile evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessibility Standards: Ranking Readiness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ranking readiness evidence for accessibility standards, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-a11y-45","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag","inclusive-design","quality","ranking-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:a11y check:45","humanCommand":"Run keyboard-only and screen-reader checks for core journeys; review the ranking-readiness evidence dimension for Accessibility Standards"}},{"id":"ni-a11y-46","testId":"ni-a11y-46","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessibility Standards: Network Contribution","description":"Validates PlatPhorm network contribution through discovery, integrations, and standards compliance for accessibility compliance, assistive technology support, and inclusive UX. Evidence should include network graph and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessibility Standards: Network Contribution appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the network contribution evidence for accessibility standards, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-a11y-46","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag","inclusive-design","quality","network-contribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:a11y check:46","humanCommand":"Run keyboard-only and screen-reader checks for core journeys; review the network-contribution evidence dimension for Accessibility Standards"}},{"id":"ni-a11y-47","testId":"ni-a11y-47","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessibility Standards: Report Readiness","description":"Validates report/export categorization with public-safe evidence and protected boundaries for accessibility compliance, assistive technology support, and inclusive UX. Evidence should include report section mapping evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessibility Standards: Report Readiness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the report readiness evidence for accessibility standards, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-a11y-47","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag","inclusive-design","quality","report-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:a11y check:47","humanCommand":"Run keyboard-only and screen-reader checks for core journeys; review the report-readiness evidence dimension for Accessibility Standards"}},{"id":"ni-a11y-48","testId":"ni-a11y-48","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessibility Standards: Operator Actionability","description":"Validates clear remediation, owner action, difficulty, and retest path for accessibility compliance, assistive technology support, and inclusive UX. Evidence should include fix instructions and command evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessibility Standards: Operator Actionability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the operator actionability evidence for accessibility standards, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-a11y-48","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag","inclusive-design","quality","operator-actionability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:a11y check:48","humanCommand":"Run keyboard-only and screen-reader checks for core journeys; review the operator-actionability evidence dimension for Accessibility Standards"}},{"id":"ni-a11y-49","testId":"ni-a11y-49","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessibility Standards: Degraded State","description":"Validates honest degraded, unavailable, skipped, and not-applicable states for accessibility compliance, assistive technology support, and inclusive UX. Evidence should include status and storage evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessibility Standards: Degraded State appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the degraded state evidence for accessibility standards, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-a11y-49","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag","inclusive-design","quality","degraded-state","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:a11y check:49","humanCommand":"Run keyboard-only and screen-reader checks for core journeys; review the degraded-state evidence dimension for Accessibility Standards"}},{"id":"ni-a11y-50","testId":"ni-a11y-50","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessibility Standards: Reproducibility","description":"Validates stable CLI/API/human reproduction path and deterministic rerun instructions for accessibility compliance, assistive technology support, and inclusive UX. Evidence should include commands and registry version evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessibility Standards: Reproducibility appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the reproducibility evidence for accessibility standards, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-a11y-50","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag","inclusive-design","quality","reproducibility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:a11y check:50","humanCommand":"Run keyboard-only and screen-reader checks for core journeys; review the reproducibility evidence dimension for Accessibility Standards"}},{"id":"ni-act-impl-01","testId":"ni-act-impl-01","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C ACT Implementations: Availability","description":"Validates public route availability and successful bounded fetch behavior for ACT rules implementation coverage, consistency, and accessibility outcome integrity. Evidence should include HTTP status, timeout, and redirect evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C ACT Implementations: Availability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the availability evidence for w3c act implementations, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-act-impl-01","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","act-rules","wcag","w3c","availability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:act-impl check:1","humanCommand":"Cross-check accessibility outcomes against W3C ACT implementation guidance; review the availability evidence dimension for W3C ACT Implementations"}},{"id":"ni-act-impl-02","testId":"ni-act-impl-02","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C ACT Implementations: Public Safety","description":"Validates public-safe access boundaries without exposing private or protected data for ACT rules implementation coverage, consistency, and accessibility outcome integrity. Evidence should include route policy and response-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C ACT Implementations: Public Safety appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the public safety evidence for w3c act implementations, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-act-impl-02","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","act-rules","wcag","w3c","public-safety","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:act-impl check:2","humanCommand":"Cross-check accessibility outcomes against W3C ACT implementation guidance; review the public-safety evidence dimension for W3C ACT Implementations"}},{"id":"ni-act-impl-03","testId":"ni-act-impl-03","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C ACT Implementations: Canonical Url","description":"Validates canonical URL stability and normalized route identity for ACT rules implementation coverage, consistency, and accessibility outcome integrity. Evidence should include canonical tags, redirects, and normalized URL evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C ACT Implementations: Canonical Url appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the canonical url evidence for w3c act implementations, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-act-impl-03","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","act-rules","wcag","w3c","canonical-url","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:act-impl check:3","humanCommand":"Cross-check accessibility outcomes against W3C ACT implementation guidance; review the canonical-url evidence dimension for W3C ACT Implementations"}},{"id":"ni-act-impl-04","testId":"ni-act-impl-04","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C ACT Implementations: Metadata Clarity","description":"Validates title, description, and page-specific metadata clarity for ACT rules implementation coverage, consistency, and accessibility outcome integrity. Evidence should include HTML metadata and extracted text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C ACT Implementations: Metadata Clarity appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the metadata clarity evidence for w3c act implementations, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-act-impl-04","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","act-rules","wcag","w3c","metadata-clarity","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:act-impl check:4","humanCommand":"Cross-check accessibility outcomes against W3C ACT implementation guidance; review the metadata-clarity evidence dimension for W3C ACT Implementations"}},{"id":"ni-act-impl-05","testId":"ni-act-impl-05","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C ACT Implementations: Semantic Structure","description":"Validates semantic HTML structure for humans, agents, and assistive technology for ACT rules implementation coverage, consistency, and accessibility outcome integrity. Evidence should include heading, landmark, and element evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C ACT Implementations: Semantic Structure appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the semantic structure evidence for w3c act implementations, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-act-impl-05","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","act-rules","wcag","w3c","semantic-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:act-impl check:5","humanCommand":"Cross-check accessibility outcomes against W3C ACT implementation guidance; review the semantic-structure evidence dimension for W3C ACT Implementations"}},{"id":"ni-act-impl-06","testId":"ni-act-impl-06","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C ACT Implementations: Machine Readability","description":"Validates machine-readable public content and predictable parsing surfaces for ACT rules implementation coverage, consistency, and accessibility outcome integrity. Evidence should include structured tags, JSON-LD, and document-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C ACT Implementations: Machine Readability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the machine readability evidence for w3c act implementations, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-act-impl-06","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","act-rules","wcag","w3c","machine-readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:act-impl check:6","humanCommand":"Cross-check accessibility outcomes against W3C ACT implementation guidance; review the machine-readability evidence dimension for W3C ACT Implementations"}},{"id":"ni-act-impl-07","testId":"ni-act-impl-07","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C ACT Implementations: Agent Discovery","description":"Validates agent discovery hints and AI-readable policy/documentation signals for ACT rules implementation coverage, consistency, and accessibility outcome integrity. Evidence should include llms, policy, MCP, OpenAPI, or schema evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C ACT Implementations: Agent Discovery appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the agent discovery evidence for w3c act implementations, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-act-impl-07","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","act-rules","wcag","w3c","agent-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:act-impl check:7","humanCommand":"Cross-check accessibility outcomes against W3C ACT implementation guidance; review the agent-discovery evidence dimension for W3C ACT Implementations"}},{"id":"ni-act-impl-08","testId":"ni-act-impl-08","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C ACT Implementations: Crawler Discovery","description":"Validates crawler discovery paths through robots, sitemap, feeds, and canonical links for ACT rules implementation coverage, consistency, and accessibility outcome integrity. Evidence should include discovery artifact and link evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C ACT Implementations: Crawler Discovery appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the crawler discovery evidence for w3c act implementations, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-act-impl-08","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","act-rules","wcag","w3c","crawler-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:act-impl check:8","humanCommand":"Cross-check accessibility outcomes against W3C ACT implementation guidance; review the crawler-discovery evidence dimension for W3C ACT Implementations"}},{"id":"ni-act-impl-09","testId":"ni-act-impl-09","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C ACT Implementations: Answerability","description":"Validates direct answer extraction and quotable explanatory content for ACT rules implementation coverage, consistency, and accessibility outcome integrity. Evidence should include question, summary, heading, and paragraph evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C ACT Implementations: Answerability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the answerability evidence for w3c act implementations, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-act-impl-09","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","act-rules","wcag","w3c","answerability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:act-impl check:9","humanCommand":"Cross-check accessibility outcomes against W3C ACT implementation guidance; review the answerability evidence dimension for W3C ACT Implementations"}},{"id":"ni-act-impl-10","testId":"ni-act-impl-10","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C ACT Implementations: Generative Context","description":"Validates GEO context quality for generative engines without inventing measured facts for ACT rules implementation coverage, consistency, and accessibility outcome integrity. Evidence should include entity, source, and instruction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C ACT Implementations: Generative Context appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the generative context evidence for w3c act implementations, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-act-impl-10","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","act-rules","wcag","w3c","generative-context","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:act-impl check:10","humanCommand":"Cross-check accessibility outcomes against W3C ACT implementation guidance; review the generative-context evidence dimension for W3C ACT Implementations"}},{"id":"ni-act-impl-11","testId":"ni-act-impl-11","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C ACT Implementations: Search Intent","description":"Validates search intent alignment and snippet-friendly content structure for ACT rules implementation coverage, consistency, and accessibility outcome integrity. Evidence should include metadata, headings, and topical text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C ACT Implementations: Search Intent appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the search intent evidence for w3c act implementations, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-act-impl-11","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","act-rules","wcag","w3c","search-intent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:act-impl check:11","humanCommand":"Cross-check accessibility outcomes against W3C ACT implementation guidance; review the search-intent evidence dimension for W3C ACT Implementations"}},{"id":"ni-act-impl-12","testId":"ni-act-impl-12","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C ACT Implementations: Accessibility Semantics","description":"Validates accessible names, relationships, landmarks, and keyboard-relevant structure for ACT rules implementation coverage, consistency, and accessibility outcome integrity. Evidence should include ARIA, labels, landmarks, and control evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C ACT Implementations: Accessibility Semantics appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the accessibility semantics evidence for w3c act implementations, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-act-impl-12","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","act-rules","wcag","w3c","accessibility-semantics","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:act-impl check:12","humanCommand":"Cross-check accessibility outcomes against W3C ACT implementation guidance; review the accessibility-semantics evidence dimension for W3C ACT Implementations"}},{"id":"ni-act-impl-13","testId":"ni-act-impl-13","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C ACT Implementations: Mobile Readiness","description":"Validates mobile viewport, responsive content, and touch-friendly layout signals for ACT rules implementation coverage, consistency, and accessibility outcome integrity. Evidence should include viewport and responsive asset evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C ACT Implementations: Mobile Readiness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the mobile readiness evidence for w3c act implementations, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-act-impl-13","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","act-rules","wcag","w3c","mobile-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:act-impl check:13","humanCommand":"Cross-check accessibility outcomes against W3C ACT implementation guidance; review the mobile-readiness evidence dimension for W3C ACT Implementations"}},{"id":"ni-act-impl-14","testId":"ni-act-impl-14","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C ACT Implementations: Performance Budget","description":"Validates performance budget compliance using measured or bounded deterministic inputs for ACT rules implementation coverage, consistency, and accessibility outcome integrity. Evidence should include timing, byte, and Lighthouse-derived evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C ACT Implementations: Performance Budget appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the performance budget evidence for w3c act implementations, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-act-impl-14","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","act-rules","wcag","w3c","performance-budget","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:act-impl check:14","humanCommand":"Cross-check accessibility outcomes against W3C ACT implementation guidance; review the performance-budget evidence dimension for W3C ACT Implementations"}},{"id":"ni-act-impl-15","testId":"ni-act-impl-15","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C ACT Implementations: Resource Efficiency","description":"Validates resource size, script/style count, and optimization opportunity signals for ACT rules implementation coverage, consistency, and accessibility outcome integrity. Evidence should include resource and markup evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C ACT Implementations: Resource Efficiency appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the resource efficiency evidence for w3c act implementations, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-act-impl-15","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","act-rules","wcag","w3c","resource-efficiency","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:act-impl check:15","humanCommand":"Cross-check accessibility outcomes against W3C ACT implementation guidance; review the resource-efficiency evidence dimension for W3C ACT Implementations"}},{"id":"ni-act-impl-16","testId":"ni-act-impl-16","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C ACT Implementations: Cache Freshness","description":"Validates cache behavior, freshness hints, and stale-content risk for ACT rules implementation coverage, consistency, and accessibility outcome integrity. Evidence should include HTTP cache and timestamp evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C ACT Implementations: Cache Freshness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the cache freshness evidence for w3c act implementations, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-act-impl-16","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","act-rules","wcag","w3c","cache-freshness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:act-impl check:16","humanCommand":"Cross-check accessibility outcomes against W3C ACT implementation guidance; review the cache-freshness evidence dimension for W3C ACT Implementations"}},{"id":"ni-act-impl-17","testId":"ni-act-impl-17","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C ACT Implementations: Route Reliability","description":"Validates route reliability, redirect safety, and dead-link risk for ACT rules implementation coverage, consistency, and accessibility outcome integrity. Evidence should include status, redirect, and sitemap evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C ACT Implementations: Route Reliability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the route reliability evidence for w3c act implementations, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-act-impl-17","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","act-rules","wcag","w3c","route-reliability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:act-impl check:17","humanCommand":"Cross-check accessibility outcomes against W3C ACT implementation guidance; review the route-reliability evidence dimension for W3C ACT Implementations"}},{"id":"ni-act-impl-18","testId":"ni-act-impl-18","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C ACT Implementations: Feed Quality","description":"Validates RSS/Atom/feed usefulness, parseability, and freshness for ACT rules implementation coverage, consistency, and accessibility outcome integrity. Evidence should include feed XML and item evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C ACT Implementations: Feed Quality appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the feed quality evidence for w3c act implementations, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-act-impl-18","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","act-rules","wcag","w3c","feed-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:act-impl check:18","humanCommand":"Cross-check accessibility outcomes against W3C ACT implementation guidance; review the feed-quality evidence dimension for W3C ACT Implementations"}},{"id":"ni-act-impl-19","testId":"ni-act-impl-19","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C ACT Implementations: Sitemap Quality","description":"Validates sitemap validity, public-safe URL coverage, and no-dead-link policy for ACT rules implementation coverage, consistency, and accessibility outcome integrity. Evidence should include sitemap XML and bounded link-check evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C ACT Implementations: Sitemap Quality appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the sitemap quality evidence for w3c act implementations, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-act-impl-19","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","act-rules","wcag","w3c","sitemap-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:act-impl check:19","humanCommand":"Cross-check accessibility outcomes against W3C ACT implementation guidance; review the sitemap-quality evidence dimension for W3C ACT Implementations"}},{"id":"ni-act-impl-20","testId":"ni-act-impl-20","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C ACT Implementations: Robots Alignment","description":"Validates robots.txt alignment with public/protected policy and sitemap discovery for ACT rules implementation coverage, consistency, and accessibility outcome integrity. Evidence should include robots directives and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C ACT Implementations: Robots Alignment appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the robots alignment evidence for w3c act implementations, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-act-impl-20","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","act-rules","wcag","w3c","robots-alignment","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:act-impl check:20","humanCommand":"Cross-check accessibility outcomes against W3C ACT implementation guidance; review the robots-alignment evidence dimension for W3C ACT Implementations"}},{"id":"ni-act-impl-21","testId":"ni-act-impl-21","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C ACT Implementations: Llms Structure","description":"Validates llms.txt structure, readability, endpoint coverage, and agent usefulness for ACT rules implementation coverage, consistency, and accessibility outcome integrity. Evidence should include plain-text section and line-length evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C ACT Implementations: Llms Structure appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms structure evidence for w3c act implementations, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-act-impl-21","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","act-rules","wcag","w3c","llms-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:act-impl check:21","humanCommand":"Cross-check accessibility outcomes against W3C ACT implementation guidance; review the llms-structure evidence dimension for W3C ACT Implementations"}},{"id":"ni-act-impl-22","testId":"ni-act-impl-22","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C ACT Implementations: Llms Index Schema","description":"Validates llms-index JSON schema shape and count reconciliation for ACT rules implementation coverage, consistency, and accessibility outcome integrity. Evidence should include JSON keys, counts, and endpoint evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C ACT Implementations: Llms Index Schema appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms index schema evidence for w3c act implementations, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-act-impl-22","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","act-rules","wcag","w3c","llms-index-schema","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:act-impl check:22","humanCommand":"Cross-check accessibility outcomes against W3C ACT implementation guidance; review the llms-index-schema evidence dimension for W3C ACT Implementations"}},{"id":"ni-act-impl-23","testId":"ni-act-impl-23","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C ACT Implementations: Humans Attribution","description":"Validates humans.txt attribution, maintainer, technology, and governance transparency for ACT rules implementation coverage, consistency, and accessibility outcome integrity. Evidence should include humans.txt section evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C ACT Implementations: Humans Attribution appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the humans attribution evidence for w3c act implementations, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-act-impl-23","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","act-rules","wcag","w3c","humans-attribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:act-impl check:23","humanCommand":"Cross-check accessibility outcomes against W3C ACT implementation guidance; review the humans-attribution evidence dimension for W3C ACT Implementations"}},{"id":"ni-act-impl-24","testId":"ni-act-impl-24","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C ACT Implementations: Agent Policy","description":"Validates agent-policy JSON clarity for allowed, disallowed, and protected operations for ACT rules implementation coverage, consistency, and accessibility outcome integrity. Evidence should include well-known policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C ACT Implementations: Agent Policy appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the agent policy evidence for w3c act implementations, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-act-impl-24","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","act-rules","wcag","w3c","agent-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:act-impl check:24","humanCommand":"Cross-check accessibility outcomes against W3C ACT implementation guidance; review the agent-policy evidence dimension for W3C ACT Implementations"}},{"id":"ni-act-impl-25","testId":"ni-act-impl-25","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C ACT Implementations: Ai Policy","description":"Validates AI policy clarity for training, search, answer use, caching, and attribution for ACT rules implementation coverage, consistency, and accessibility outcome integrity. Evidence should include well-known AI policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C ACT Implementations: Ai Policy appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ai policy evidence for w3c act implementations, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-act-impl-25","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","act-rules","wcag","w3c","ai-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:act-impl check:25","humanCommand":"Cross-check accessibility outcomes against W3C ACT implementation guidance; review the ai-policy evidence dimension for W3C ACT Implementations"}},{"id":"ni-act-impl-26","testId":"ni-act-impl-26","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C ACT Implementations: Trust Policy","description":"Validates trust policy coverage for privacy, traceability, metadata, and protected actions for ACT rules implementation coverage, consistency, and accessibility outcome integrity. Evidence should include trust.json evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C ACT Implementations: Trust Policy appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the trust policy evidence for w3c act implementations, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-act-impl-26","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","act-rules","wcag","w3c","trust-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:act-impl check:26","humanCommand":"Cross-check accessibility outcomes against W3C ACT implementation guidance; review the trust-policy evidence dimension for W3C ACT Implementations"}},{"id":"ni-act-impl-27","testId":"ni-act-impl-27","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C ACT Implementations: Openapi Contract","description":"Validates OpenAPI availability, server URL accuracy, schemas, and auth policy for ACT rules implementation coverage, consistency, and accessibility outcome integrity. Evidence should include OpenAPI text/JSON evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C ACT Implementations: Openapi Contract appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the openapi contract evidence for w3c act implementations, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-act-impl-27","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","act-rules","wcag","w3c","openapi-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:act-impl check:27","humanCommand":"Cross-check accessibility outcomes against W3C ACT implementation guidance; review the openapi-contract evidence dimension for W3C ACT Implementations"}},{"id":"ni-act-impl-28","testId":"ni-act-impl-28","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C ACT Implementations: Mcp Contract","description":"Validates MCP JSON-RPC introspection, real tools, resources, and protected boundaries for ACT rules implementation coverage, consistency, and accessibility outcome integrity. Evidence should include MCP manifest and initialize evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C ACT Implementations: Mcp Contract appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the mcp contract evidence for w3c act implementations, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-act-impl-28","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","act-rules","wcag","w3c","mcp-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:act-impl check:28","humanCommand":"Cross-check accessibility outcomes against W3C ACT implementation guidance; review the mcp-contract evidence dimension for W3C ACT Implementations"}},{"id":"ni-act-impl-29","testId":"ni-act-impl-29","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C ACT Implementations: Api Error Shape","description":"Validates API success/error response shape consistency for ACT rules implementation coverage, consistency, and accessibility outcome integrity. Evidence should include REST envelope evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C ACT Implementations: Api Error Shape appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the api error shape evidence for w3c act implementations, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-act-impl-29","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","act-rules","wcag","w3c","api-error-shape","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:act-impl check:29","humanCommand":"Cross-check accessibility outcomes against W3C ACT implementation guidance; review the api-error-shape evidence dimension for W3C ACT Implementations"}},{"id":"ni-act-impl-30","testId":"ni-act-impl-30","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C ACT Implementations: Traceability","description":"Validates trace propagation, request IDs, and safe observability correlation for ACT rules implementation coverage, consistency, and accessibility outcome integrity. Evidence should include trace header and metadata evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C ACT Implementations: Traceability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the traceability evidence for w3c act implementations, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-act-impl-30","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","act-rules","wcag","w3c","traceability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:act-impl check:30","humanCommand":"Cross-check accessibility outcomes against W3C ACT implementation guidance; review the traceability evidence dimension for W3C ACT Implementations"}},{"id":"ni-act-impl-31","testId":"ni-act-impl-31","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C ACT Implementations: Ja4 Redaction","description":"Validates fingerprint-adjacent metadata redaction and non-public raw JA4 handling for ACT rules implementation coverage, consistency, and accessibility outcome integrity. Evidence should include metadata policy and redaction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C ACT Implementations: Ja4 Redaction appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the ja4 redaction evidence for w3c act implementations, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-act-impl-31","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","act-rules","wcag","w3c","ja4-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:act-impl check:31","humanCommand":"Cross-check accessibility outcomes against W3C ACT implementation guidance; review the ja4-redaction evidence dimension for W3C ACT Implementations"}},{"id":"ni-act-impl-32","testId":"ni-act-impl-32","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C ACT Implementations: Secret Redaction","description":"Validates absence of secrets, generic key examples, cookies, and raw tokens in public outputs for ACT rules implementation coverage, consistency, and accessibility outcome integrity. Evidence should include public artifact scan evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C ACT Implementations: Secret Redaction appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the secret redaction evidence for w3c act implementations, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-act-impl-32","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","act-rules","wcag","w3c","secret-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:act-impl check:32","humanCommand":"Cross-check accessibility outcomes against W3C ACT implementation guidance; review the secret-redaction evidence dimension for W3C ACT Implementations"}},{"id":"ni-act-impl-33","testId":"ni-act-impl-33","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C ACT Implementations: Security Headers","description":"Validates security header coverage and hardened transport signals for ACT rules implementation coverage, consistency, and accessibility outcome integrity. Evidence should include HTTP header evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C ACT Implementations: Security Headers appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the security headers evidence for w3c act implementations, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-act-impl-33","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","act-rules","wcag","w3c","security-headers","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:act-impl check:33","humanCommand":"Cross-check accessibility outcomes against W3C ACT implementation guidance; review the security-headers evidence dimension for W3C ACT Implementations"}},{"id":"ni-act-impl-34","testId":"ni-act-impl-34","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C ACT Implementations: Privacy Consent","description":"Validates privacy policy, consent, attribution, and data-use disclosure quality for ACT rules implementation coverage, consistency, and accessibility outcome integrity. Evidence should include public page and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C ACT Implementations: Privacy Consent appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the privacy consent evidence for w3c act implementations, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-act-impl-34","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","act-rules","wcag","w3c","privacy-consent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:act-impl check:34","humanCommand":"Cross-check accessibility outcomes against W3C ACT implementation guidance; review the privacy-consent evidence dimension for W3C ACT Implementations"}},{"id":"ni-act-impl-35","testId":"ni-act-impl-35","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C ACT Implementations: Structured Data","description":"Validates JSON-LD and entity modeling for machine interpretation for ACT rules implementation coverage, consistency, and accessibility outcome integrity. Evidence should include schema block and parse evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C ACT Implementations: Structured Data appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the structured data evidence for w3c act implementations, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-act-impl-35","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","act-rules","wcag","w3c","structured-data","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:act-impl check:35","humanCommand":"Cross-check accessibility outcomes against W3C ACT implementation guidance; review the structured-data evidence dimension for W3C ACT Implementations"}},{"id":"ni-act-impl-36","testId":"ni-act-impl-36","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C ACT Implementations: Social Preview","description":"Validates Open Graph and Twitter/X card readiness for public sharing for ACT rules implementation coverage, consistency, and accessibility outcome integrity. Evidence should include meta tag evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C ACT Implementations: Social Preview appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the social preview evidence for w3c act implementations, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-act-impl-36","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","act-rules","wcag","w3c","social-preview","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:act-impl check:36","humanCommand":"Cross-check accessibility outcomes against W3C ACT implementation guidance; review the social-preview evidence dimension for W3C ACT Implementations"}},{"id":"ni-act-impl-37","testId":"ni-act-impl-37","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C ACT Implementations: I18n Routing","description":"Validates locale route, hreflang, language declaration, and translation readiness for ACT rules implementation coverage, consistency, and accessibility outcome integrity. Evidence should include lang/hreflang and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C ACT Implementations: I18n Routing appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the i18n routing evidence for w3c act implementations, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-act-impl-37","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","act-rules","wcag","w3c","i18n-routing","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:act-impl check:37","humanCommand":"Cross-check accessibility outcomes against W3C ACT implementation guidance; review the i18n-routing evidence dimension for W3C ACT Implementations"}},{"id":"ni-act-impl-38","testId":"ni-act-impl-38","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C ACT Implementations: Readability","description":"Validates human readability, sectioning, sentence complexity, and comprehension support for ACT rules implementation coverage, consistency, and accessibility outcome integrity. Evidence should include extracted content evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C ACT Implementations: Readability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the readability evidence for w3c act implementations, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-act-impl-38","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","act-rules","wcag","w3c","readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:act-impl check:38","humanCommand":"Cross-check accessibility outcomes against W3C ACT implementation guidance; review the readability evidence dimension for W3C ACT Implementations"}},{"id":"ni-act-impl-39","testId":"ni-act-impl-39","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C ACT Implementations: Content Utility","description":"Validates non-placeholder content usefulness and domain-specific public value for ACT rules implementation coverage, consistency, and accessibility outcome integrity. Evidence should include content extraction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C ACT Implementations: Content Utility appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the content utility evidence for w3c act implementations, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-act-impl-39","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","act-rules","wcag","w3c","content-utility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:act-impl check:39","humanCommand":"Cross-check accessibility outcomes against W3C ACT implementation guidance; review the content-utility evidence dimension for W3C ACT Implementations"}},{"id":"ni-act-impl-40","testId":"ni-act-impl-40","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C ACT Implementations: Recommendation Grounding","description":"Validates recommendation grounding in deterministic evidence instead of fabricated model output for ACT rules implementation coverage, consistency, and accessibility outcome integrity. Evidence should include issue and remediation evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C ACT Implementations: Recommendation Grounding appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the recommendation grounding evidence for w3c act implementations, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-act-impl-40","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","act-rules","wcag","w3c","recommendation-grounding","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:act-impl check:40","humanCommand":"Cross-check accessibility outcomes against W3C ACT implementation guidance; review the recommendation-grounding evidence dimension for W3C ACT Implementations"}},{"id":"ni-act-impl-41","testId":"ni-act-impl-41","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C ACT Implementations: Evidence Quality","description":"Validates evidence completeness, public safety, and reproducibility for ACT rules implementation coverage, consistency, and accessibility outcome integrity. Evidence should include test output and artifact evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C ACT Implementations: Evidence Quality appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the evidence quality evidence for w3c act implementations, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-act-impl-41","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","act-rules","wcag","w3c","evidence-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:act-impl check:41","humanCommand":"Cross-check accessibility outcomes against W3C ACT implementation guidance; review the evidence-quality evidence dimension for W3C ACT Implementations"}},{"id":"ni-act-impl-42","testId":"ni-act-impl-42","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C ACT Implementations: Threshold Policy","description":"Validates threshold clarity, pass/warn/fail semantics, and scoring transparency for ACT rules implementation coverage, consistency, and accessibility outcome integrity. Evidence should include threshold and result status evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C ACT Implementations: Threshold Policy appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the threshold policy evidence for w3c act implementations, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-act-impl-42","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","act-rules","wcag","w3c","threshold-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:act-impl check:42","humanCommand":"Cross-check accessibility outcomes against W3C ACT implementation guidance; review the threshold-policy evidence dimension for W3C ACT Implementations"}},{"id":"ni-act-impl-43","testId":"ni-act-impl-43","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C ACT Implementations: Confidence","description":"Validates confidence scoring and degraded-input disclosure for ACT rules implementation coverage, consistency, and accessibility outcome integrity. Evidence should include source freshness and input availability evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C ACT Implementations: Confidence appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the confidence evidence for w3c act implementations, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-act-impl-43","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","act-rules","wcag","w3c","confidence","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:act-impl check:43","humanCommand":"Cross-check accessibility outcomes against W3C ACT implementation guidance; review the confidence evidence dimension for W3C ACT Implementations"}},{"id":"ni-act-impl-44","testId":"ni-act-impl-44","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C ACT Implementations: Trend Readiness","description":"Validates historical comparability and timeline readiness for future reruns for ACT rules implementation coverage, consistency, and accessibility outcome integrity. Evidence should include analysis ID, timestamp, and persistence evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C ACT Implementations: Trend Readiness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the trend readiness evidence for w3c act implementations, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-act-impl-44","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","act-rules","wcag","w3c","trend-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:act-impl check:44","humanCommand":"Cross-check accessibility outcomes against W3C ACT implementation guidance; review the trend-readiness evidence dimension for W3C ACT Implementations"}},{"id":"ni-act-impl-45","testId":"ni-act-impl-45","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C ACT Implementations: Ranking Readiness","description":"Validates ranking input completeness and profile compatibility for ACT rules implementation coverage, consistency, and accessibility outcome integrity. Evidence should include score and profile evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C ACT Implementations: Ranking Readiness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ranking readiness evidence for w3c act implementations, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-act-impl-45","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","act-rules","wcag","w3c","ranking-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:act-impl check:45","humanCommand":"Cross-check accessibility outcomes against W3C ACT implementation guidance; review the ranking-readiness evidence dimension for W3C ACT Implementations"}},{"id":"ni-act-impl-46","testId":"ni-act-impl-46","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C ACT Implementations: Network Contribution","description":"Validates PlatPhorm network contribution through discovery, integrations, and standards compliance for ACT rules implementation coverage, consistency, and accessibility outcome integrity. Evidence should include network graph and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C ACT Implementations: Network Contribution appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the network contribution evidence for w3c act implementations, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-act-impl-46","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","act-rules","wcag","w3c","network-contribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:act-impl check:46","humanCommand":"Cross-check accessibility outcomes against W3C ACT implementation guidance; review the network-contribution evidence dimension for W3C ACT Implementations"}},{"id":"ni-act-impl-47","testId":"ni-act-impl-47","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C ACT Implementations: Report Readiness","description":"Validates report/export categorization with public-safe evidence and protected boundaries for ACT rules implementation coverage, consistency, and accessibility outcome integrity. Evidence should include report section mapping evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C ACT Implementations: Report Readiness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the report readiness evidence for w3c act implementations, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-act-impl-47","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","act-rules","wcag","w3c","report-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:act-impl check:47","humanCommand":"Cross-check accessibility outcomes against W3C ACT implementation guidance; review the report-readiness evidence dimension for W3C ACT Implementations"}},{"id":"ni-act-impl-48","testId":"ni-act-impl-48","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C ACT Implementations: Operator Actionability","description":"Validates clear remediation, owner action, difficulty, and retest path for ACT rules implementation coverage, consistency, and accessibility outcome integrity. Evidence should include fix instructions and command evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C ACT Implementations: Operator Actionability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the operator actionability evidence for w3c act implementations, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-act-impl-48","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","act-rules","wcag","w3c","operator-actionability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:act-impl check:48","humanCommand":"Cross-check accessibility outcomes against W3C ACT implementation guidance; review the operator-actionability evidence dimension for W3C ACT Implementations"}},{"id":"ni-act-impl-49","testId":"ni-act-impl-49","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C ACT Implementations: Degraded State","description":"Validates honest degraded, unavailable, skipped, and not-applicable states for ACT rules implementation coverage, consistency, and accessibility outcome integrity. Evidence should include status and storage evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C ACT Implementations: Degraded State appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the degraded state evidence for w3c act implementations, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-act-impl-49","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","act-rules","wcag","w3c","degraded-state","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:act-impl check:49","humanCommand":"Cross-check accessibility outcomes against W3C ACT implementation guidance; review the degraded-state evidence dimension for W3C ACT Implementations"}},{"id":"ni-act-impl-50","testId":"ni-act-impl-50","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C ACT Implementations: Reproducibility","description":"Validates stable CLI/API/human reproduction path and deterministic rerun instructions for ACT rules implementation coverage, consistency, and accessibility outcome integrity. Evidence should include commands and registry version evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C ACT Implementations: Reproducibility appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the reproducibility evidence for w3c act implementations, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-act-impl-50","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","act-rules","wcag","w3c","reproducibility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:act-impl check:50","humanCommand":"Cross-check accessibility outcomes against W3C ACT implementation guidance; review the reproducibility evidence dimension for W3C ACT Implementations"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-22-01","testId":"ni-wcag-22-01","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Availability","description":"Validates public route availability and successful bounded fetch behavior for wcag 2.2 success criteria conformance and modern accessibility safeguard coverage. Evidence should include HTTP status, timeout, and redirect evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Availability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the availability evidence for wcag 2.2 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-22-01","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.2","wcag","w3c","availability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-22 check:1","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.2 success criteria and outcomes; review the availability evidence dimension for WCAG 2.2 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-22-02","testId":"ni-wcag-22-02","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Public Safety","description":"Validates public-safe access boundaries without exposing private or protected data for wcag 2.2 success criteria conformance and modern accessibility safeguard coverage. Evidence should include route policy and response-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Public Safety appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the public safety evidence for wcag 2.2 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-22-02","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.2","wcag","w3c","public-safety","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-22 check:2","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.2 success criteria and outcomes; review the public-safety evidence dimension for WCAG 2.2 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-22-03","testId":"ni-wcag-22-03","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Canonical Url","description":"Validates canonical URL stability and normalized route identity for wcag 2.2 success criteria conformance and modern accessibility safeguard coverage. Evidence should include canonical tags, redirects, and normalized URL evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Canonical Url appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the canonical url evidence for wcag 2.2 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-22-03","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.2","wcag","w3c","canonical-url","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-22 check:3","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.2 success criteria and outcomes; review the canonical-url evidence dimension for WCAG 2.2 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-22-04","testId":"ni-wcag-22-04","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Metadata Clarity","description":"Validates title, description, and page-specific metadata clarity for wcag 2.2 success criteria conformance and modern accessibility safeguard coverage. Evidence should include HTML metadata and extracted text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Metadata Clarity appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the metadata clarity evidence for wcag 2.2 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-22-04","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.2","wcag","w3c","metadata-clarity","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-22 check:4","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.2 success criteria and outcomes; review the metadata-clarity evidence dimension for WCAG 2.2 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-22-05","testId":"ni-wcag-22-05","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Semantic Structure","description":"Validates semantic HTML structure for humans, agents, and assistive technology for wcag 2.2 success criteria conformance and modern accessibility safeguard coverage. Evidence should include heading, landmark, and element evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Semantic Structure appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the semantic structure evidence for wcag 2.2 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-22-05","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.2","wcag","w3c","semantic-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-22 check:5","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.2 success criteria and outcomes; review the semantic-structure evidence dimension for WCAG 2.2 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-22-06","testId":"ni-wcag-22-06","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Machine Readability","description":"Validates machine-readable public content and predictable parsing surfaces for wcag 2.2 success criteria conformance and modern accessibility safeguard coverage. Evidence should include structured tags, JSON-LD, and document-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Machine Readability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the machine readability evidence for wcag 2.2 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-22-06","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.2","wcag","w3c","machine-readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-22 check:6","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.2 success criteria and outcomes; review the machine-readability evidence dimension for WCAG 2.2 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-22-07","testId":"ni-wcag-22-07","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Agent Discovery","description":"Validates agent discovery hints and AI-readable policy/documentation signals for wcag 2.2 success criteria conformance and modern accessibility safeguard coverage. Evidence should include llms, policy, MCP, OpenAPI, or schema evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Agent Discovery appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the agent discovery evidence for wcag 2.2 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-22-07","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.2","wcag","w3c","agent-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-22 check:7","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.2 success criteria and outcomes; review the agent-discovery evidence dimension for WCAG 2.2 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-22-08","testId":"ni-wcag-22-08","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Crawler Discovery","description":"Validates crawler discovery paths through robots, sitemap, feeds, and canonical links for wcag 2.2 success criteria conformance and modern accessibility safeguard coverage. Evidence should include discovery artifact and link evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Crawler Discovery appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the crawler discovery evidence for wcag 2.2 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-22-08","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.2","wcag","w3c","crawler-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-22 check:8","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.2 success criteria and outcomes; review the crawler-discovery evidence dimension for WCAG 2.2 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-22-09","testId":"ni-wcag-22-09","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Answerability","description":"Validates direct answer extraction and quotable explanatory content for wcag 2.2 success criteria conformance and modern accessibility safeguard coverage. Evidence should include question, summary, heading, and paragraph evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Answerability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the answerability evidence for wcag 2.2 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-22-09","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.2","wcag","w3c","answerability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-22 check:9","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.2 success criteria and outcomes; review the answerability evidence dimension for WCAG 2.2 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-22-10","testId":"ni-wcag-22-10","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Generative Context","description":"Validates GEO context quality for generative engines without inventing measured facts for wcag 2.2 success criteria conformance and modern accessibility safeguard coverage. Evidence should include entity, source, and instruction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Generative Context appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the generative context evidence for wcag 2.2 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-22-10","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.2","wcag","w3c","generative-context","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-22 check:10","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.2 success criteria and outcomes; review the generative-context evidence dimension for WCAG 2.2 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-22-11","testId":"ni-wcag-22-11","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Search Intent","description":"Validates search intent alignment and snippet-friendly content structure for wcag 2.2 success criteria conformance and modern accessibility safeguard coverage. Evidence should include metadata, headings, and topical text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Search Intent appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the search intent evidence for wcag 2.2 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-22-11","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.2","wcag","w3c","search-intent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-22 check:11","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.2 success criteria and outcomes; review the search-intent evidence dimension for WCAG 2.2 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-22-12","testId":"ni-wcag-22-12","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Accessibility Semantics","description":"Validates accessible names, relationships, landmarks, and keyboard-relevant structure for wcag 2.2 success criteria conformance and modern accessibility safeguard coverage. Evidence should include ARIA, labels, landmarks, and control evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Accessibility Semantics appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the accessibility semantics evidence for wcag 2.2 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-22-12","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.2","wcag","w3c","accessibility-semantics","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-22 check:12","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.2 success criteria and outcomes; review the accessibility-semantics evidence dimension for WCAG 2.2 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-22-13","testId":"ni-wcag-22-13","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Mobile Readiness","description":"Validates mobile viewport, responsive content, and touch-friendly layout signals for wcag 2.2 success criteria conformance and modern accessibility safeguard coverage. Evidence should include viewport and responsive asset evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Mobile Readiness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the mobile readiness evidence for wcag 2.2 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-22-13","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.2","wcag","w3c","mobile-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-22 check:13","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.2 success criteria and outcomes; review the mobile-readiness evidence dimension for WCAG 2.2 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-22-14","testId":"ni-wcag-22-14","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Performance Budget","description":"Validates performance budget compliance using measured or bounded deterministic inputs for wcag 2.2 success criteria conformance and modern accessibility safeguard coverage. Evidence should include timing, byte, and Lighthouse-derived evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Performance Budget appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the performance budget evidence for wcag 2.2 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-22-14","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.2","wcag","w3c","performance-budget","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-22 check:14","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.2 success criteria and outcomes; review the performance-budget evidence dimension for WCAG 2.2 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-22-15","testId":"ni-wcag-22-15","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Resource Efficiency","description":"Validates resource size, script/style count, and optimization opportunity signals for wcag 2.2 success criteria conformance and modern accessibility safeguard coverage. Evidence should include resource and markup evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Resource Efficiency appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the resource efficiency evidence for wcag 2.2 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-22-15","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.2","wcag","w3c","resource-efficiency","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-22 check:15","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.2 success criteria and outcomes; review the resource-efficiency evidence dimension for WCAG 2.2 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-22-16","testId":"ni-wcag-22-16","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Cache Freshness","description":"Validates cache behavior, freshness hints, and stale-content risk for wcag 2.2 success criteria conformance and modern accessibility safeguard coverage. Evidence should include HTTP cache and timestamp evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Cache Freshness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the cache freshness evidence for wcag 2.2 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-22-16","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.2","wcag","w3c","cache-freshness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-22 check:16","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.2 success criteria and outcomes; review the cache-freshness evidence dimension for WCAG 2.2 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-22-17","testId":"ni-wcag-22-17","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Route Reliability","description":"Validates route reliability, redirect safety, and dead-link risk for wcag 2.2 success criteria conformance and modern accessibility safeguard coverage. Evidence should include status, redirect, and sitemap evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Route Reliability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the route reliability evidence for wcag 2.2 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-22-17","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.2","wcag","w3c","route-reliability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-22 check:17","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.2 success criteria and outcomes; review the route-reliability evidence dimension for WCAG 2.2 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-22-18","testId":"ni-wcag-22-18","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Feed Quality","description":"Validates RSS/Atom/feed usefulness, parseability, and freshness for wcag 2.2 success criteria conformance and modern accessibility safeguard coverage. Evidence should include feed XML and item evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Feed Quality appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the feed quality evidence for wcag 2.2 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-22-18","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.2","wcag","w3c","feed-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-22 check:18","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.2 success criteria and outcomes; review the feed-quality evidence dimension for WCAG 2.2 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-22-19","testId":"ni-wcag-22-19","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Sitemap Quality","description":"Validates sitemap validity, public-safe URL coverage, and no-dead-link policy for wcag 2.2 success criteria conformance and modern accessibility safeguard coverage. Evidence should include sitemap XML and bounded link-check evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Sitemap Quality appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the sitemap quality evidence for wcag 2.2 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-22-19","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.2","wcag","w3c","sitemap-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-22 check:19","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.2 success criteria and outcomes; review the sitemap-quality evidence dimension for WCAG 2.2 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-22-20","testId":"ni-wcag-22-20","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Robots Alignment","description":"Validates robots.txt alignment with public/protected policy and sitemap discovery for wcag 2.2 success criteria conformance and modern accessibility safeguard coverage. Evidence should include robots directives and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Robots Alignment appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the robots alignment evidence for wcag 2.2 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-22-20","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.2","wcag","w3c","robots-alignment","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-22 check:20","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.2 success criteria and outcomes; review the robots-alignment evidence dimension for WCAG 2.2 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-22-21","testId":"ni-wcag-22-21","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Llms Structure","description":"Validates llms.txt structure, readability, endpoint coverage, and agent usefulness for wcag 2.2 success criteria conformance and modern accessibility safeguard coverage. Evidence should include plain-text section and line-length evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Llms Structure appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms structure evidence for wcag 2.2 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-22-21","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.2","wcag","w3c","llms-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-22 check:21","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.2 success criteria and outcomes; review the llms-structure evidence dimension for WCAG 2.2 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-22-22","testId":"ni-wcag-22-22","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Llms Index Schema","description":"Validates llms-index JSON schema shape and count reconciliation for wcag 2.2 success criteria conformance and modern accessibility safeguard coverage. Evidence should include JSON keys, counts, and endpoint evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Llms Index Schema appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms index schema evidence for wcag 2.2 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-22-22","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.2","wcag","w3c","llms-index-schema","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-22 check:22","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.2 success criteria and outcomes; review the llms-index-schema evidence dimension for WCAG 2.2 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-22-23","testId":"ni-wcag-22-23","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Humans Attribution","description":"Validates humans.txt attribution, maintainer, technology, and governance transparency for wcag 2.2 success criteria conformance and modern accessibility safeguard coverage. Evidence should include humans.txt section evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Humans Attribution appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the humans attribution evidence for wcag 2.2 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-22-23","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.2","wcag","w3c","humans-attribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-22 check:23","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.2 success criteria and outcomes; review the humans-attribution evidence dimension for WCAG 2.2 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-22-24","testId":"ni-wcag-22-24","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Agent Policy","description":"Validates agent-policy JSON clarity for allowed, disallowed, and protected operations for wcag 2.2 success criteria conformance and modern accessibility safeguard coverage. Evidence should include well-known policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Agent Policy appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the agent policy evidence for wcag 2.2 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-22-24","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.2","wcag","w3c","agent-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-22 check:24","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.2 success criteria and outcomes; review the agent-policy evidence dimension for WCAG 2.2 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-22-25","testId":"ni-wcag-22-25","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Ai Policy","description":"Validates AI policy clarity for training, search, answer use, caching, and attribution for wcag 2.2 success criteria conformance and modern accessibility safeguard coverage. Evidence should include well-known AI policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Ai Policy appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ai policy evidence for wcag 2.2 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-22-25","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.2","wcag","w3c","ai-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-22 check:25","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.2 success criteria and outcomes; review the ai-policy evidence dimension for WCAG 2.2 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-22-26","testId":"ni-wcag-22-26","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Trust Policy","description":"Validates trust policy coverage for privacy, traceability, metadata, and protected actions for wcag 2.2 success criteria conformance and modern accessibility safeguard coverage. Evidence should include trust.json evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Trust Policy appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the trust policy evidence for wcag 2.2 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-22-26","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.2","wcag","w3c","trust-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-22 check:26","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.2 success criteria and outcomes; review the trust-policy evidence dimension for WCAG 2.2 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-22-27","testId":"ni-wcag-22-27","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Openapi Contract","description":"Validates OpenAPI availability, server URL accuracy, schemas, and auth policy for wcag 2.2 success criteria conformance and modern accessibility safeguard coverage. Evidence should include OpenAPI text/JSON evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Openapi Contract appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the openapi contract evidence for wcag 2.2 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-22-27","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.2","wcag","w3c","openapi-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-22 check:27","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.2 success criteria and outcomes; review the openapi-contract evidence dimension for WCAG 2.2 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-22-28","testId":"ni-wcag-22-28","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Mcp Contract","description":"Validates MCP JSON-RPC introspection, real tools, resources, and protected boundaries for wcag 2.2 success criteria conformance and modern accessibility safeguard coverage. Evidence should include MCP manifest and initialize evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Mcp Contract appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the mcp contract evidence for wcag 2.2 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-22-28","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.2","wcag","w3c","mcp-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-22 check:28","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.2 success criteria and outcomes; review the mcp-contract evidence dimension for WCAG 2.2 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-22-29","testId":"ni-wcag-22-29","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Api Error Shape","description":"Validates API success/error response shape consistency for wcag 2.2 success criteria conformance and modern accessibility safeguard coverage. Evidence should include REST envelope evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Api Error Shape appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the api error shape evidence for wcag 2.2 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-22-29","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.2","wcag","w3c","api-error-shape","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-22 check:29","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.2 success criteria and outcomes; review the api-error-shape evidence dimension for WCAG 2.2 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-22-30","testId":"ni-wcag-22-30","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Traceability","description":"Validates trace propagation, request IDs, and safe observability correlation for wcag 2.2 success criteria conformance and modern accessibility safeguard coverage. Evidence should include trace header and metadata evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Traceability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the traceability evidence for wcag 2.2 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-22-30","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.2","wcag","w3c","traceability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-22 check:30","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.2 success criteria and outcomes; review the traceability evidence dimension for WCAG 2.2 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-22-31","testId":"ni-wcag-22-31","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Ja4 Redaction","description":"Validates fingerprint-adjacent metadata redaction and non-public raw JA4 handling for wcag 2.2 success criteria conformance and modern accessibility safeguard coverage. Evidence should include metadata policy and redaction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Ja4 Redaction appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the ja4 redaction evidence for wcag 2.2 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-22-31","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.2","wcag","w3c","ja4-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-22 check:31","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.2 success criteria and outcomes; review the ja4-redaction evidence dimension for WCAG 2.2 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-22-32","testId":"ni-wcag-22-32","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Secret Redaction","description":"Validates absence of secrets, generic key examples, cookies, and raw tokens in public outputs for wcag 2.2 success criteria conformance and modern accessibility safeguard coverage. Evidence should include public artifact scan evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Secret Redaction appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the secret redaction evidence for wcag 2.2 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-22-32","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.2","wcag","w3c","secret-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-22 check:32","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.2 success criteria and outcomes; review the secret-redaction evidence dimension for WCAG 2.2 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-22-33","testId":"ni-wcag-22-33","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Security Headers","description":"Validates security header coverage and hardened transport signals for wcag 2.2 success criteria conformance and modern accessibility safeguard coverage. Evidence should include HTTP header evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Security Headers appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the security headers evidence for wcag 2.2 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-22-33","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.2","wcag","w3c","security-headers","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-22 check:33","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.2 success criteria and outcomes; review the security-headers evidence dimension for WCAG 2.2 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-22-34","testId":"ni-wcag-22-34","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Privacy Consent","description":"Validates privacy policy, consent, attribution, and data-use disclosure quality for wcag 2.2 success criteria conformance and modern accessibility safeguard coverage. Evidence should include public page and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Privacy Consent appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the privacy consent evidence for wcag 2.2 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-22-34","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.2","wcag","w3c","privacy-consent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-22 check:34","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.2 success criteria and outcomes; review the privacy-consent evidence dimension for WCAG 2.2 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-22-35","testId":"ni-wcag-22-35","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Structured Data","description":"Validates JSON-LD and entity modeling for machine interpretation for wcag 2.2 success criteria conformance and modern accessibility safeguard coverage. Evidence should include schema block and parse evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Structured Data appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the structured data evidence for wcag 2.2 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-22-35","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.2","wcag","w3c","structured-data","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-22 check:35","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.2 success criteria and outcomes; review the structured-data evidence dimension for WCAG 2.2 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-22-36","testId":"ni-wcag-22-36","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Social Preview","description":"Validates Open Graph and Twitter/X card readiness for public sharing for wcag 2.2 success criteria conformance and modern accessibility safeguard coverage. Evidence should include meta tag evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Social Preview appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the social preview evidence for wcag 2.2 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-22-36","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.2","wcag","w3c","social-preview","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-22 check:36","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.2 success criteria and outcomes; review the social-preview evidence dimension for WCAG 2.2 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-22-37","testId":"ni-wcag-22-37","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: I18n Routing","description":"Validates locale route, hreflang, language declaration, and translation readiness for wcag 2.2 success criteria conformance and modern accessibility safeguard coverage. Evidence should include lang/hreflang and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: I18n Routing appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the i18n routing evidence for wcag 2.2 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-22-37","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.2","wcag","w3c","i18n-routing","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-22 check:37","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.2 success criteria and outcomes; review the i18n-routing evidence dimension for WCAG 2.2 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-22-38","testId":"ni-wcag-22-38","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Readability","description":"Validates human readability, sectioning, sentence complexity, and comprehension support for wcag 2.2 success criteria conformance and modern accessibility safeguard coverage. Evidence should include extracted content evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Readability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the readability evidence for wcag 2.2 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-22-38","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.2","wcag","w3c","readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-22 check:38","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.2 success criteria and outcomes; review the readability evidence dimension for WCAG 2.2 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-22-39","testId":"ni-wcag-22-39","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Content Utility","description":"Validates non-placeholder content usefulness and domain-specific public value for wcag 2.2 success criteria conformance and modern accessibility safeguard coverage. Evidence should include content extraction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Content Utility appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the content utility evidence for wcag 2.2 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-22-39","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.2","wcag","w3c","content-utility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-22 check:39","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.2 success criteria and outcomes; review the content-utility evidence dimension for WCAG 2.2 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-22-40","testId":"ni-wcag-22-40","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Recommendation Grounding","description":"Validates recommendation grounding in deterministic evidence instead of fabricated model output for wcag 2.2 success criteria conformance and modern accessibility safeguard coverage. Evidence should include issue and remediation evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Recommendation Grounding appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the recommendation grounding evidence for wcag 2.2 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-22-40","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.2","wcag","w3c","recommendation-grounding","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-22 check:40","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.2 success criteria and outcomes; review the recommendation-grounding evidence dimension for WCAG 2.2 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-22-41","testId":"ni-wcag-22-41","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Evidence Quality","description":"Validates evidence completeness, public safety, and reproducibility for wcag 2.2 success criteria conformance and modern accessibility safeguard coverage. Evidence should include test output and artifact evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Evidence Quality appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the evidence quality evidence for wcag 2.2 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-22-41","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.2","wcag","w3c","evidence-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-22 check:41","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.2 success criteria and outcomes; review the evidence-quality evidence dimension for WCAG 2.2 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-22-42","testId":"ni-wcag-22-42","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Threshold Policy","description":"Validates threshold clarity, pass/warn/fail semantics, and scoring transparency for wcag 2.2 success criteria conformance and modern accessibility safeguard coverage. Evidence should include threshold and result status evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Threshold Policy appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the threshold policy evidence for wcag 2.2 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-22-42","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.2","wcag","w3c","threshold-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-22 check:42","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.2 success criteria and outcomes; review the threshold-policy evidence dimension for WCAG 2.2 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-22-43","testId":"ni-wcag-22-43","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Confidence","description":"Validates confidence scoring and degraded-input disclosure for wcag 2.2 success criteria conformance and modern accessibility safeguard coverage. Evidence should include source freshness and input availability evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Confidence appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the confidence evidence for wcag 2.2 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-22-43","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.2","wcag","w3c","confidence","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-22 check:43","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.2 success criteria and outcomes; review the confidence evidence dimension for WCAG 2.2 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-22-44","testId":"ni-wcag-22-44","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Trend Readiness","description":"Validates historical comparability and timeline readiness for future reruns for wcag 2.2 success criteria conformance and modern accessibility safeguard coverage. Evidence should include analysis ID, timestamp, and persistence evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Trend Readiness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the trend readiness evidence for wcag 2.2 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-22-44","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.2","wcag","w3c","trend-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-22 check:44","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.2 success criteria and outcomes; review the trend-readiness evidence dimension for WCAG 2.2 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-22-45","testId":"ni-wcag-22-45","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Ranking Readiness","description":"Validates ranking input completeness and profile compatibility for wcag 2.2 success criteria conformance and modern accessibility safeguard coverage. Evidence should include score and profile evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Ranking Readiness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ranking readiness evidence for wcag 2.2 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-22-45","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.2","wcag","w3c","ranking-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-22 check:45","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.2 success criteria and outcomes; review the ranking-readiness evidence dimension for WCAG 2.2 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-22-46","testId":"ni-wcag-22-46","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Network Contribution","description":"Validates PlatPhorm network contribution through discovery, integrations, and standards compliance for wcag 2.2 success criteria conformance and modern accessibility safeguard coverage. Evidence should include network graph and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Network Contribution appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the network contribution evidence for wcag 2.2 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-22-46","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.2","wcag","w3c","network-contribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-22 check:46","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.2 success criteria and outcomes; review the network-contribution evidence dimension for WCAG 2.2 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-22-47","testId":"ni-wcag-22-47","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Report Readiness","description":"Validates report/export categorization with public-safe evidence and protected boundaries for wcag 2.2 success criteria conformance and modern accessibility safeguard coverage. Evidence should include report section mapping evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Report Readiness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the report readiness evidence for wcag 2.2 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-22-47","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.2","wcag","w3c","report-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-22 check:47","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.2 success criteria and outcomes; review the report-readiness evidence dimension for WCAG 2.2 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-22-48","testId":"ni-wcag-22-48","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Operator Actionability","description":"Validates clear remediation, owner action, difficulty, and retest path for wcag 2.2 success criteria conformance and modern accessibility safeguard coverage. Evidence should include fix instructions and command evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Operator Actionability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the operator actionability evidence for wcag 2.2 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-22-48","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.2","wcag","w3c","operator-actionability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-22 check:48","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.2 success criteria and outcomes; review the operator-actionability evidence dimension for WCAG 2.2 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-22-49","testId":"ni-wcag-22-49","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Degraded State","description":"Validates honest degraded, unavailable, skipped, and not-applicable states for wcag 2.2 success criteria conformance and modern accessibility safeguard coverage. Evidence should include status and storage evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Degraded State appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the degraded state evidence for wcag 2.2 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-22-49","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.2","wcag","w3c","degraded-state","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-22 check:49","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.2 success criteria and outcomes; review the degraded-state evidence dimension for WCAG 2.2 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-22-50","testId":"ni-wcag-22-50","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Reproducibility","description":"Validates stable CLI/API/human reproduction path and deterministic rerun instructions for wcag 2.2 success criteria conformance and modern accessibility safeguard coverage. Evidence should include commands and registry version evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.2 Coverage: Reproducibility appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the reproducibility evidence for wcag 2.2 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-22-50","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.2","wcag","w3c","reproducibility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-22 check:50","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.2 success criteria and outcomes; review the reproducibility evidence dimension for WCAG 2.2 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-21-01","testId":"ni-wcag-21-01","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Availability","description":"Validates public route availability and successful bounded fetch behavior for wcag 2.1 criterion coverage with mobile, low-vision, and cognitive accessibility checks. Evidence should include HTTP status, timeout, and redirect evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Availability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the availability evidence for wcag 2.1 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-21-01","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.1","wcag","w3c","availability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-21 check:1","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.1 success criteria and outcomes; review the availability evidence dimension for WCAG 2.1 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-21-02","testId":"ni-wcag-21-02","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Public Safety","description":"Validates public-safe access boundaries without exposing private or protected data for wcag 2.1 criterion coverage with mobile, low-vision, and cognitive accessibility checks. Evidence should include route policy and response-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Public Safety appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the public safety evidence for wcag 2.1 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-21-02","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.1","wcag","w3c","public-safety","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-21 check:2","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.1 success criteria and outcomes; review the public-safety evidence dimension for WCAG 2.1 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-21-03","testId":"ni-wcag-21-03","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Canonical Url","description":"Validates canonical URL stability and normalized route identity for wcag 2.1 criterion coverage with mobile, low-vision, and cognitive accessibility checks. Evidence should include canonical tags, redirects, and normalized URL evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Canonical Url appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the canonical url evidence for wcag 2.1 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-21-03","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.1","wcag","w3c","canonical-url","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-21 check:3","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.1 success criteria and outcomes; review the canonical-url evidence dimension for WCAG 2.1 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-21-04","testId":"ni-wcag-21-04","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Metadata Clarity","description":"Validates title, description, and page-specific metadata clarity for wcag 2.1 criterion coverage with mobile, low-vision, and cognitive accessibility checks. Evidence should include HTML metadata and extracted text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Metadata Clarity appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the metadata clarity evidence for wcag 2.1 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-21-04","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.1","wcag","w3c","metadata-clarity","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-21 check:4","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.1 success criteria and outcomes; review the metadata-clarity evidence dimension for WCAG 2.1 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-21-05","testId":"ni-wcag-21-05","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Semantic Structure","description":"Validates semantic HTML structure for humans, agents, and assistive technology for wcag 2.1 criterion coverage with mobile, low-vision, and cognitive accessibility checks. Evidence should include heading, landmark, and element evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Semantic Structure appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the semantic structure evidence for wcag 2.1 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-21-05","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.1","wcag","w3c","semantic-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-21 check:5","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.1 success criteria and outcomes; review the semantic-structure evidence dimension for WCAG 2.1 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-21-06","testId":"ni-wcag-21-06","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Machine Readability","description":"Validates machine-readable public content and predictable parsing surfaces for wcag 2.1 criterion coverage with mobile, low-vision, and cognitive accessibility checks. Evidence should include structured tags, JSON-LD, and document-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Machine Readability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the machine readability evidence for wcag 2.1 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-21-06","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.1","wcag","w3c","machine-readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-21 check:6","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.1 success criteria and outcomes; review the machine-readability evidence dimension for WCAG 2.1 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-21-07","testId":"ni-wcag-21-07","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Agent Discovery","description":"Validates agent discovery hints and AI-readable policy/documentation signals for wcag 2.1 criterion coverage with mobile, low-vision, and cognitive accessibility checks. Evidence should include llms, policy, MCP, OpenAPI, or schema evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Agent Discovery appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the agent discovery evidence for wcag 2.1 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-21-07","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.1","wcag","w3c","agent-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-21 check:7","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.1 success criteria and outcomes; review the agent-discovery evidence dimension for WCAG 2.1 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-21-08","testId":"ni-wcag-21-08","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Crawler Discovery","description":"Validates crawler discovery paths through robots, sitemap, feeds, and canonical links for wcag 2.1 criterion coverage with mobile, low-vision, and cognitive accessibility checks. Evidence should include discovery artifact and link evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Crawler Discovery appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the crawler discovery evidence for wcag 2.1 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-21-08","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.1","wcag","w3c","crawler-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-21 check:8","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.1 success criteria and outcomes; review the crawler-discovery evidence dimension for WCAG 2.1 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-21-09","testId":"ni-wcag-21-09","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Answerability","description":"Validates direct answer extraction and quotable explanatory content for wcag 2.1 criterion coverage with mobile, low-vision, and cognitive accessibility checks. Evidence should include question, summary, heading, and paragraph evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Answerability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the answerability evidence for wcag 2.1 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-21-09","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.1","wcag","w3c","answerability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-21 check:9","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.1 success criteria and outcomes; review the answerability evidence dimension for WCAG 2.1 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-21-10","testId":"ni-wcag-21-10","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Generative Context","description":"Validates GEO context quality for generative engines without inventing measured facts for wcag 2.1 criterion coverage with mobile, low-vision, and cognitive accessibility checks. Evidence should include entity, source, and instruction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Generative Context appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the generative context evidence for wcag 2.1 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-21-10","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.1","wcag","w3c","generative-context","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-21 check:10","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.1 success criteria and outcomes; review the generative-context evidence dimension for WCAG 2.1 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-21-11","testId":"ni-wcag-21-11","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Search Intent","description":"Validates search intent alignment and snippet-friendly content structure for wcag 2.1 criterion coverage with mobile, low-vision, and cognitive accessibility checks. Evidence should include metadata, headings, and topical text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Search Intent appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the search intent evidence for wcag 2.1 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-21-11","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.1","wcag","w3c","search-intent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-21 check:11","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.1 success criteria and outcomes; review the search-intent evidence dimension for WCAG 2.1 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-21-12","testId":"ni-wcag-21-12","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Accessibility Semantics","description":"Validates accessible names, relationships, landmarks, and keyboard-relevant structure for wcag 2.1 criterion coverage with mobile, low-vision, and cognitive accessibility checks. Evidence should include ARIA, labels, landmarks, and control evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Accessibility Semantics appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the accessibility semantics evidence for wcag 2.1 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-21-12","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.1","wcag","w3c","accessibility-semantics","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-21 check:12","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.1 success criteria and outcomes; review the accessibility-semantics evidence dimension for WCAG 2.1 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-21-13","testId":"ni-wcag-21-13","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Mobile Readiness","description":"Validates mobile viewport, responsive content, and touch-friendly layout signals for wcag 2.1 criterion coverage with mobile, low-vision, and cognitive accessibility checks. Evidence should include viewport and responsive asset evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Mobile Readiness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the mobile readiness evidence for wcag 2.1 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-21-13","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.1","wcag","w3c","mobile-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-21 check:13","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.1 success criteria and outcomes; review the mobile-readiness evidence dimension for WCAG 2.1 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-21-14","testId":"ni-wcag-21-14","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Performance Budget","description":"Validates performance budget compliance using measured or bounded deterministic inputs for wcag 2.1 criterion coverage with mobile, low-vision, and cognitive accessibility checks. Evidence should include timing, byte, and Lighthouse-derived evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Performance Budget appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the performance budget evidence for wcag 2.1 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-21-14","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.1","wcag","w3c","performance-budget","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-21 check:14","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.1 success criteria and outcomes; review the performance-budget evidence dimension for WCAG 2.1 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-21-15","testId":"ni-wcag-21-15","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Resource Efficiency","description":"Validates resource size, script/style count, and optimization opportunity signals for wcag 2.1 criterion coverage with mobile, low-vision, and cognitive accessibility checks. Evidence should include resource and markup evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Resource Efficiency appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the resource efficiency evidence for wcag 2.1 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-21-15","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.1","wcag","w3c","resource-efficiency","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-21 check:15","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.1 success criteria and outcomes; review the resource-efficiency evidence dimension for WCAG 2.1 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-21-16","testId":"ni-wcag-21-16","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Cache Freshness","description":"Validates cache behavior, freshness hints, and stale-content risk for wcag 2.1 criterion coverage with mobile, low-vision, and cognitive accessibility checks. Evidence should include HTTP cache and timestamp evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Cache Freshness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the cache freshness evidence for wcag 2.1 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-21-16","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.1","wcag","w3c","cache-freshness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-21 check:16","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.1 success criteria and outcomes; review the cache-freshness evidence dimension for WCAG 2.1 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-21-17","testId":"ni-wcag-21-17","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Route Reliability","description":"Validates route reliability, redirect safety, and dead-link risk for wcag 2.1 criterion coverage with mobile, low-vision, and cognitive accessibility checks. Evidence should include status, redirect, and sitemap evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Route Reliability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the route reliability evidence for wcag 2.1 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-21-17","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.1","wcag","w3c","route-reliability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-21 check:17","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.1 success criteria and outcomes; review the route-reliability evidence dimension for WCAG 2.1 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-21-18","testId":"ni-wcag-21-18","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Feed Quality","description":"Validates RSS/Atom/feed usefulness, parseability, and freshness for wcag 2.1 criterion coverage with mobile, low-vision, and cognitive accessibility checks. Evidence should include feed XML and item evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Feed Quality appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the feed quality evidence for wcag 2.1 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-21-18","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.1","wcag","w3c","feed-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-21 check:18","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.1 success criteria and outcomes; review the feed-quality evidence dimension for WCAG 2.1 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-21-19","testId":"ni-wcag-21-19","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Sitemap Quality","description":"Validates sitemap validity, public-safe URL coverage, and no-dead-link policy for wcag 2.1 criterion coverage with mobile, low-vision, and cognitive accessibility checks. Evidence should include sitemap XML and bounded link-check evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Sitemap Quality appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the sitemap quality evidence for wcag 2.1 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-21-19","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.1","wcag","w3c","sitemap-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-21 check:19","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.1 success criteria and outcomes; review the sitemap-quality evidence dimension for WCAG 2.1 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-21-20","testId":"ni-wcag-21-20","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Robots Alignment","description":"Validates robots.txt alignment with public/protected policy and sitemap discovery for wcag 2.1 criterion coverage with mobile, low-vision, and cognitive accessibility checks. Evidence should include robots directives and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Robots Alignment appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the robots alignment evidence for wcag 2.1 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-21-20","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.1","wcag","w3c","robots-alignment","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-21 check:20","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.1 success criteria and outcomes; review the robots-alignment evidence dimension for WCAG 2.1 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-21-21","testId":"ni-wcag-21-21","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Llms Structure","description":"Validates llms.txt structure, readability, endpoint coverage, and agent usefulness for wcag 2.1 criterion coverage with mobile, low-vision, and cognitive accessibility checks. Evidence should include plain-text section and line-length evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Llms Structure appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms structure evidence for wcag 2.1 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-21-21","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.1","wcag","w3c","llms-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-21 check:21","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.1 success criteria and outcomes; review the llms-structure evidence dimension for WCAG 2.1 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-21-22","testId":"ni-wcag-21-22","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Llms Index Schema","description":"Validates llms-index JSON schema shape and count reconciliation for wcag 2.1 criterion coverage with mobile, low-vision, and cognitive accessibility checks. Evidence should include JSON keys, counts, and endpoint evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Llms Index Schema appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms index schema evidence for wcag 2.1 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-21-22","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.1","wcag","w3c","llms-index-schema","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-21 check:22","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.1 success criteria and outcomes; review the llms-index-schema evidence dimension for WCAG 2.1 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-21-23","testId":"ni-wcag-21-23","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Humans Attribution","description":"Validates humans.txt attribution, maintainer, technology, and governance transparency for wcag 2.1 criterion coverage with mobile, low-vision, and cognitive accessibility checks. Evidence should include humans.txt section evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Humans Attribution appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the humans attribution evidence for wcag 2.1 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-21-23","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.1","wcag","w3c","humans-attribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-21 check:23","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.1 success criteria and outcomes; review the humans-attribution evidence dimension for WCAG 2.1 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-21-24","testId":"ni-wcag-21-24","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Agent Policy","description":"Validates agent-policy JSON clarity for allowed, disallowed, and protected operations for wcag 2.1 criterion coverage with mobile, low-vision, and cognitive accessibility checks. Evidence should include well-known policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Agent Policy appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the agent policy evidence for wcag 2.1 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-21-24","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.1","wcag","w3c","agent-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-21 check:24","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.1 success criteria and outcomes; review the agent-policy evidence dimension for WCAG 2.1 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-21-25","testId":"ni-wcag-21-25","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Ai Policy","description":"Validates AI policy clarity for training, search, answer use, caching, and attribution for wcag 2.1 criterion coverage with mobile, low-vision, and cognitive accessibility checks. Evidence should include well-known AI policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Ai Policy appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ai policy evidence for wcag 2.1 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-21-25","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.1","wcag","w3c","ai-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-21 check:25","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.1 success criteria and outcomes; review the ai-policy evidence dimension for WCAG 2.1 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-21-26","testId":"ni-wcag-21-26","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Trust Policy","description":"Validates trust policy coverage for privacy, traceability, metadata, and protected actions for wcag 2.1 criterion coverage with mobile, low-vision, and cognitive accessibility checks. Evidence should include trust.json evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Trust Policy appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the trust policy evidence for wcag 2.1 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-21-26","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.1","wcag","w3c","trust-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-21 check:26","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.1 success criteria and outcomes; review the trust-policy evidence dimension for WCAG 2.1 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-21-27","testId":"ni-wcag-21-27","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Openapi Contract","description":"Validates OpenAPI availability, server URL accuracy, schemas, and auth policy for wcag 2.1 criterion coverage with mobile, low-vision, and cognitive accessibility checks. Evidence should include OpenAPI text/JSON evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Openapi Contract appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the openapi contract evidence for wcag 2.1 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-21-27","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.1","wcag","w3c","openapi-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-21 check:27","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.1 success criteria and outcomes; review the openapi-contract evidence dimension for WCAG 2.1 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-21-28","testId":"ni-wcag-21-28","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Mcp Contract","description":"Validates MCP JSON-RPC introspection, real tools, resources, and protected boundaries for wcag 2.1 criterion coverage with mobile, low-vision, and cognitive accessibility checks. Evidence should include MCP manifest and initialize evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Mcp Contract appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the mcp contract evidence for wcag 2.1 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-21-28","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.1","wcag","w3c","mcp-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-21 check:28","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.1 success criteria and outcomes; review the mcp-contract evidence dimension for WCAG 2.1 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-21-29","testId":"ni-wcag-21-29","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Api Error Shape","description":"Validates API success/error response shape consistency for wcag 2.1 criterion coverage with mobile, low-vision, and cognitive accessibility checks. Evidence should include REST envelope evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Api Error Shape appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the api error shape evidence for wcag 2.1 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-21-29","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.1","wcag","w3c","api-error-shape","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-21 check:29","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.1 success criteria and outcomes; review the api-error-shape evidence dimension for WCAG 2.1 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-21-30","testId":"ni-wcag-21-30","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Traceability","description":"Validates trace propagation, request IDs, and safe observability correlation for wcag 2.1 criterion coverage with mobile, low-vision, and cognitive accessibility checks. Evidence should include trace header and metadata evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Traceability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the traceability evidence for wcag 2.1 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-21-30","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.1","wcag","w3c","traceability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-21 check:30","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.1 success criteria and outcomes; review the traceability evidence dimension for WCAG 2.1 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-21-31","testId":"ni-wcag-21-31","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Ja4 Redaction","description":"Validates fingerprint-adjacent metadata redaction and non-public raw JA4 handling for wcag 2.1 criterion coverage with mobile, low-vision, and cognitive accessibility checks. Evidence should include metadata policy and redaction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Ja4 Redaction appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the ja4 redaction evidence for wcag 2.1 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-21-31","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.1","wcag","w3c","ja4-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-21 check:31","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.1 success criteria and outcomes; review the ja4-redaction evidence dimension for WCAG 2.1 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-21-32","testId":"ni-wcag-21-32","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Secret Redaction","description":"Validates absence of secrets, generic key examples, cookies, and raw tokens in public outputs for wcag 2.1 criterion coverage with mobile, low-vision, and cognitive accessibility checks. Evidence should include public artifact scan evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Secret Redaction appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the secret redaction evidence for wcag 2.1 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-21-32","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.1","wcag","w3c","secret-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-21 check:32","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.1 success criteria and outcomes; review the secret-redaction evidence dimension for WCAG 2.1 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-21-33","testId":"ni-wcag-21-33","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Security Headers","description":"Validates security header coverage and hardened transport signals for wcag 2.1 criterion coverage with mobile, low-vision, and cognitive accessibility checks. Evidence should include HTTP header evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Security Headers appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the security headers evidence for wcag 2.1 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-21-33","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.1","wcag","w3c","security-headers","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-21 check:33","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.1 success criteria and outcomes; review the security-headers evidence dimension for WCAG 2.1 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-21-34","testId":"ni-wcag-21-34","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Privacy Consent","description":"Validates privacy policy, consent, attribution, and data-use disclosure quality for wcag 2.1 criterion coverage with mobile, low-vision, and cognitive accessibility checks. Evidence should include public page and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Privacy Consent appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the privacy consent evidence for wcag 2.1 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-21-34","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.1","wcag","w3c","privacy-consent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-21 check:34","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.1 success criteria and outcomes; review the privacy-consent evidence dimension for WCAG 2.1 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-21-35","testId":"ni-wcag-21-35","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Structured Data","description":"Validates JSON-LD and entity modeling for machine interpretation for wcag 2.1 criterion coverage with mobile, low-vision, and cognitive accessibility checks. Evidence should include schema block and parse evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Structured Data appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the structured data evidence for wcag 2.1 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-21-35","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.1","wcag","w3c","structured-data","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-21 check:35","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.1 success criteria and outcomes; review the structured-data evidence dimension for WCAG 2.1 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-21-36","testId":"ni-wcag-21-36","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Social Preview","description":"Validates Open Graph and Twitter/X card readiness for public sharing for wcag 2.1 criterion coverage with mobile, low-vision, and cognitive accessibility checks. Evidence should include meta tag evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Social Preview appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the social preview evidence for wcag 2.1 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-21-36","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.1","wcag","w3c","social-preview","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-21 check:36","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.1 success criteria and outcomes; review the social-preview evidence dimension for WCAG 2.1 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-21-37","testId":"ni-wcag-21-37","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: I18n Routing","description":"Validates locale route, hreflang, language declaration, and translation readiness for wcag 2.1 criterion coverage with mobile, low-vision, and cognitive accessibility checks. Evidence should include lang/hreflang and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: I18n Routing appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the i18n routing evidence for wcag 2.1 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-21-37","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.1","wcag","w3c","i18n-routing","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-21 check:37","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.1 success criteria and outcomes; review the i18n-routing evidence dimension for WCAG 2.1 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-21-38","testId":"ni-wcag-21-38","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Readability","description":"Validates human readability, sectioning, sentence complexity, and comprehension support for wcag 2.1 criterion coverage with mobile, low-vision, and cognitive accessibility checks. Evidence should include extracted content evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Readability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the readability evidence for wcag 2.1 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-21-38","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.1","wcag","w3c","readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-21 check:38","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.1 success criteria and outcomes; review the readability evidence dimension for WCAG 2.1 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-21-39","testId":"ni-wcag-21-39","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Content Utility","description":"Validates non-placeholder content usefulness and domain-specific public value for wcag 2.1 criterion coverage with mobile, low-vision, and cognitive accessibility checks. Evidence should include content extraction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Content Utility appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the content utility evidence for wcag 2.1 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-21-39","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.1","wcag","w3c","content-utility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-21 check:39","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.1 success criteria and outcomes; review the content-utility evidence dimension for WCAG 2.1 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-21-40","testId":"ni-wcag-21-40","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Recommendation Grounding","description":"Validates recommendation grounding in deterministic evidence instead of fabricated model output for wcag 2.1 criterion coverage with mobile, low-vision, and cognitive accessibility checks. Evidence should include issue and remediation evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Recommendation Grounding appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the recommendation grounding evidence for wcag 2.1 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-21-40","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.1","wcag","w3c","recommendation-grounding","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-21 check:40","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.1 success criteria and outcomes; review the recommendation-grounding evidence dimension for WCAG 2.1 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-21-41","testId":"ni-wcag-21-41","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Evidence Quality","description":"Validates evidence completeness, public safety, and reproducibility for wcag 2.1 criterion coverage with mobile, low-vision, and cognitive accessibility checks. Evidence should include test output and artifact evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Evidence Quality appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the evidence quality evidence for wcag 2.1 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-21-41","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.1","wcag","w3c","evidence-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-21 check:41","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.1 success criteria and outcomes; review the evidence-quality evidence dimension for WCAG 2.1 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-21-42","testId":"ni-wcag-21-42","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Threshold Policy","description":"Validates threshold clarity, pass/warn/fail semantics, and scoring transparency for wcag 2.1 criterion coverage with mobile, low-vision, and cognitive accessibility checks. Evidence should include threshold and result status evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Threshold Policy appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the threshold policy evidence for wcag 2.1 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-21-42","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.1","wcag","w3c","threshold-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-21 check:42","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.1 success criteria and outcomes; review the threshold-policy evidence dimension for WCAG 2.1 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-21-43","testId":"ni-wcag-21-43","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Confidence","description":"Validates confidence scoring and degraded-input disclosure for wcag 2.1 criterion coverage with mobile, low-vision, and cognitive accessibility checks. Evidence should include source freshness and input availability evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Confidence appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the confidence evidence for wcag 2.1 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-21-43","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.1","wcag","w3c","confidence","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-21 check:43","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.1 success criteria and outcomes; review the confidence evidence dimension for WCAG 2.1 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-21-44","testId":"ni-wcag-21-44","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Trend Readiness","description":"Validates historical comparability and timeline readiness for future reruns for wcag 2.1 criterion coverage with mobile, low-vision, and cognitive accessibility checks. Evidence should include analysis ID, timestamp, and persistence evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Trend Readiness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the trend readiness evidence for wcag 2.1 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-21-44","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.1","wcag","w3c","trend-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-21 check:44","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.1 success criteria and outcomes; review the trend-readiness evidence dimension for WCAG 2.1 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-21-45","testId":"ni-wcag-21-45","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Ranking Readiness","description":"Validates ranking input completeness and profile compatibility for wcag 2.1 criterion coverage with mobile, low-vision, and cognitive accessibility checks. Evidence should include score and profile evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Ranking Readiness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ranking readiness evidence for wcag 2.1 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-21-45","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.1","wcag","w3c","ranking-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-21 check:45","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.1 success criteria and outcomes; review the ranking-readiness evidence dimension for WCAG 2.1 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-21-46","testId":"ni-wcag-21-46","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Network Contribution","description":"Validates PlatPhorm network contribution through discovery, integrations, and standards compliance for wcag 2.1 criterion coverage with mobile, low-vision, and cognitive accessibility checks. Evidence should include network graph and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Network Contribution appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the network contribution evidence for wcag 2.1 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-21-46","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.1","wcag","w3c","network-contribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-21 check:46","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.1 success criteria and outcomes; review the network-contribution evidence dimension for WCAG 2.1 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-21-47","testId":"ni-wcag-21-47","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Report Readiness","description":"Validates report/export categorization with public-safe evidence and protected boundaries for wcag 2.1 criterion coverage with mobile, low-vision, and cognitive accessibility checks. Evidence should include report section mapping evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Report Readiness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the report readiness evidence for wcag 2.1 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-21-47","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.1","wcag","w3c","report-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-21 check:47","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.1 success criteria and outcomes; review the report-readiness evidence dimension for WCAG 2.1 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-21-48","testId":"ni-wcag-21-48","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Operator Actionability","description":"Validates clear remediation, owner action, difficulty, and retest path for wcag 2.1 criterion coverage with mobile, low-vision, and cognitive accessibility checks. Evidence should include fix instructions and command evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Operator Actionability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the operator actionability evidence for wcag 2.1 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-21-48","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.1","wcag","w3c","operator-actionability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-21 check:48","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.1 success criteria and outcomes; review the operator-actionability evidence dimension for WCAG 2.1 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-21-49","testId":"ni-wcag-21-49","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Degraded State","description":"Validates honest degraded, unavailable, skipped, and not-applicable states for wcag 2.1 criterion coverage with mobile, low-vision, and cognitive accessibility checks. Evidence should include status and storage evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Degraded State appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the degraded state evidence for wcag 2.1 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-21-49","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.1","wcag","w3c","degraded-state","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-21 check:49","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.1 success criteria and outcomes; review the degraded-state evidence dimension for WCAG 2.1 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-21-50","testId":"ni-wcag-21-50","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Reproducibility","description":"Validates stable CLI/API/human reproduction path and deterministic rerun instructions for wcag 2.1 criterion coverage with mobile, low-vision, and cognitive accessibility checks. Evidence should include commands and registry version evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.1 Coverage: Reproducibility appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the reproducibility evidence for wcag 2.1 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-21-50","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.1","wcag","w3c","reproducibility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-21 check:50","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.1 success criteria and outcomes; review the reproducibility evidence dimension for WCAG 2.1 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-20-01","testId":"ni-wcag-20-01","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Availability","description":"Validates public route availability and successful bounded fetch behavior for legacy wcag 2.0 baseline conformance for broad interoperability and compliance continuity. Evidence should include HTTP status, timeout, and redirect evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Availability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the availability evidence for wcag 2.0 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-20-01","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.0","wcag","w3c","availability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-20 check:1","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.0 success criteria and outcomes; review the availability evidence dimension for WCAG 2.0 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-20-02","testId":"ni-wcag-20-02","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Public Safety","description":"Validates public-safe access boundaries without exposing private or protected data for legacy wcag 2.0 baseline conformance for broad interoperability and compliance continuity. Evidence should include route policy and response-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Public Safety appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the public safety evidence for wcag 2.0 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-20-02","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.0","wcag","w3c","public-safety","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-20 check:2","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.0 success criteria and outcomes; review the public-safety evidence dimension for WCAG 2.0 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-20-03","testId":"ni-wcag-20-03","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Canonical Url","description":"Validates canonical URL stability and normalized route identity for legacy wcag 2.0 baseline conformance for broad interoperability and compliance continuity. Evidence should include canonical tags, redirects, and normalized URL evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Canonical Url appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the canonical url evidence for wcag 2.0 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-20-03","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.0","wcag","w3c","canonical-url","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-20 check:3","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.0 success criteria and outcomes; review the canonical-url evidence dimension for WCAG 2.0 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-20-04","testId":"ni-wcag-20-04","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Metadata Clarity","description":"Validates title, description, and page-specific metadata clarity for legacy wcag 2.0 baseline conformance for broad interoperability and compliance continuity. Evidence should include HTML metadata and extracted text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Metadata Clarity appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the metadata clarity evidence for wcag 2.0 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-20-04","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.0","wcag","w3c","metadata-clarity","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-20 check:4","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.0 success criteria and outcomes; review the metadata-clarity evidence dimension for WCAG 2.0 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-20-05","testId":"ni-wcag-20-05","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Semantic Structure","description":"Validates semantic HTML structure for humans, agents, and assistive technology for legacy wcag 2.0 baseline conformance for broad interoperability and compliance continuity. Evidence should include heading, landmark, and element evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Semantic Structure appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the semantic structure evidence for wcag 2.0 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-20-05","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.0","wcag","w3c","semantic-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-20 check:5","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.0 success criteria and outcomes; review the semantic-structure evidence dimension for WCAG 2.0 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-20-06","testId":"ni-wcag-20-06","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Machine Readability","description":"Validates machine-readable public content and predictable parsing surfaces for legacy wcag 2.0 baseline conformance for broad interoperability and compliance continuity. Evidence should include structured tags, JSON-LD, and document-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Machine Readability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the machine readability evidence for wcag 2.0 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-20-06","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.0","wcag","w3c","machine-readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-20 check:6","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.0 success criteria and outcomes; review the machine-readability evidence dimension for WCAG 2.0 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-20-07","testId":"ni-wcag-20-07","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Agent Discovery","description":"Validates agent discovery hints and AI-readable policy/documentation signals for legacy wcag 2.0 baseline conformance for broad interoperability and compliance continuity. Evidence should include llms, policy, MCP, OpenAPI, or schema evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Agent Discovery appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the agent discovery evidence for wcag 2.0 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-20-07","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.0","wcag","w3c","agent-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-20 check:7","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.0 success criteria and outcomes; review the agent-discovery evidence dimension for WCAG 2.0 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-20-08","testId":"ni-wcag-20-08","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Crawler Discovery","description":"Validates crawler discovery paths through robots, sitemap, feeds, and canonical links for legacy wcag 2.0 baseline conformance for broad interoperability and compliance continuity. Evidence should include discovery artifact and link evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Crawler Discovery appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the crawler discovery evidence for wcag 2.0 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-20-08","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.0","wcag","w3c","crawler-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-20 check:8","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.0 success criteria and outcomes; review the crawler-discovery evidence dimension for WCAG 2.0 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-20-09","testId":"ni-wcag-20-09","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Answerability","description":"Validates direct answer extraction and quotable explanatory content for legacy wcag 2.0 baseline conformance for broad interoperability and compliance continuity. Evidence should include question, summary, heading, and paragraph evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Answerability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the answerability evidence for wcag 2.0 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-20-09","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.0","wcag","w3c","answerability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-20 check:9","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.0 success criteria and outcomes; review the answerability evidence dimension for WCAG 2.0 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-20-10","testId":"ni-wcag-20-10","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Generative Context","description":"Validates GEO context quality for generative engines without inventing measured facts for legacy wcag 2.0 baseline conformance for broad interoperability and compliance continuity. Evidence should include entity, source, and instruction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Generative Context appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the generative context evidence for wcag 2.0 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-20-10","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.0","wcag","w3c","generative-context","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-20 check:10","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.0 success criteria and outcomes; review the generative-context evidence dimension for WCAG 2.0 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-20-11","testId":"ni-wcag-20-11","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Search Intent","description":"Validates search intent alignment and snippet-friendly content structure for legacy wcag 2.0 baseline conformance for broad interoperability and compliance continuity. Evidence should include metadata, headings, and topical text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Search Intent appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the search intent evidence for wcag 2.0 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-20-11","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.0","wcag","w3c","search-intent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-20 check:11","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.0 success criteria and outcomes; review the search-intent evidence dimension for WCAG 2.0 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-20-12","testId":"ni-wcag-20-12","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Accessibility Semantics","description":"Validates accessible names, relationships, landmarks, and keyboard-relevant structure for legacy wcag 2.0 baseline conformance for broad interoperability and compliance continuity. Evidence should include ARIA, labels, landmarks, and control evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Accessibility Semantics appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the accessibility semantics evidence for wcag 2.0 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-20-12","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.0","wcag","w3c","accessibility-semantics","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-20 check:12","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.0 success criteria and outcomes; review the accessibility-semantics evidence dimension for WCAG 2.0 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-20-13","testId":"ni-wcag-20-13","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Mobile Readiness","description":"Validates mobile viewport, responsive content, and touch-friendly layout signals for legacy wcag 2.0 baseline conformance for broad interoperability and compliance continuity. Evidence should include viewport and responsive asset evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Mobile Readiness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the mobile readiness evidence for wcag 2.0 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-20-13","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.0","wcag","w3c","mobile-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-20 check:13","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.0 success criteria and outcomes; review the mobile-readiness evidence dimension for WCAG 2.0 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-20-14","testId":"ni-wcag-20-14","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Performance Budget","description":"Validates performance budget compliance using measured or bounded deterministic inputs for legacy wcag 2.0 baseline conformance for broad interoperability and compliance continuity. Evidence should include timing, byte, and Lighthouse-derived evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Performance Budget appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the performance budget evidence for wcag 2.0 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-20-14","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.0","wcag","w3c","performance-budget","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-20 check:14","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.0 success criteria and outcomes; review the performance-budget evidence dimension for WCAG 2.0 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-20-15","testId":"ni-wcag-20-15","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Resource Efficiency","description":"Validates resource size, script/style count, and optimization opportunity signals for legacy wcag 2.0 baseline conformance for broad interoperability and compliance continuity. Evidence should include resource and markup evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Resource Efficiency appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the resource efficiency evidence for wcag 2.0 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-20-15","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.0","wcag","w3c","resource-efficiency","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-20 check:15","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.0 success criteria and outcomes; review the resource-efficiency evidence dimension for WCAG 2.0 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-20-16","testId":"ni-wcag-20-16","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Cache Freshness","description":"Validates cache behavior, freshness hints, and stale-content risk for legacy wcag 2.0 baseline conformance for broad interoperability and compliance continuity. Evidence should include HTTP cache and timestamp evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Cache Freshness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the cache freshness evidence for wcag 2.0 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-20-16","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.0","wcag","w3c","cache-freshness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-20 check:16","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.0 success criteria and outcomes; review the cache-freshness evidence dimension for WCAG 2.0 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-20-17","testId":"ni-wcag-20-17","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Route Reliability","description":"Validates route reliability, redirect safety, and dead-link risk for legacy wcag 2.0 baseline conformance for broad interoperability and compliance continuity. Evidence should include status, redirect, and sitemap evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Route Reliability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the route reliability evidence for wcag 2.0 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-20-17","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.0","wcag","w3c","route-reliability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-20 check:17","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.0 success criteria and outcomes; review the route-reliability evidence dimension for WCAG 2.0 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-20-18","testId":"ni-wcag-20-18","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Feed Quality","description":"Validates RSS/Atom/feed usefulness, parseability, and freshness for legacy wcag 2.0 baseline conformance for broad interoperability and compliance continuity. Evidence should include feed XML and item evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Feed Quality appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the feed quality evidence for wcag 2.0 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-20-18","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.0","wcag","w3c","feed-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-20 check:18","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.0 success criteria and outcomes; review the feed-quality evidence dimension for WCAG 2.0 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-20-19","testId":"ni-wcag-20-19","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Sitemap Quality","description":"Validates sitemap validity, public-safe URL coverage, and no-dead-link policy for legacy wcag 2.0 baseline conformance for broad interoperability and compliance continuity. Evidence should include sitemap XML and bounded link-check evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Sitemap Quality appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the sitemap quality evidence for wcag 2.0 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-20-19","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.0","wcag","w3c","sitemap-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-20 check:19","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.0 success criteria and outcomes; review the sitemap-quality evidence dimension for WCAG 2.0 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-20-20","testId":"ni-wcag-20-20","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Robots Alignment","description":"Validates robots.txt alignment with public/protected policy and sitemap discovery for legacy wcag 2.0 baseline conformance for broad interoperability and compliance continuity. Evidence should include robots directives and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Robots Alignment appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the robots alignment evidence for wcag 2.0 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-20-20","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.0","wcag","w3c","robots-alignment","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-20 check:20","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.0 success criteria and outcomes; review the robots-alignment evidence dimension for WCAG 2.0 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-20-21","testId":"ni-wcag-20-21","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Llms Structure","description":"Validates llms.txt structure, readability, endpoint coverage, and agent usefulness for legacy wcag 2.0 baseline conformance for broad interoperability and compliance continuity. Evidence should include plain-text section and line-length evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Llms Structure appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms structure evidence for wcag 2.0 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-20-21","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.0","wcag","w3c","llms-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-20 check:21","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.0 success criteria and outcomes; review the llms-structure evidence dimension for WCAG 2.0 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-20-22","testId":"ni-wcag-20-22","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Llms Index Schema","description":"Validates llms-index JSON schema shape and count reconciliation for legacy wcag 2.0 baseline conformance for broad interoperability and compliance continuity. Evidence should include JSON keys, counts, and endpoint evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Llms Index Schema appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms index schema evidence for wcag 2.0 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-20-22","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.0","wcag","w3c","llms-index-schema","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-20 check:22","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.0 success criteria and outcomes; review the llms-index-schema evidence dimension for WCAG 2.0 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-20-23","testId":"ni-wcag-20-23","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Humans Attribution","description":"Validates humans.txt attribution, maintainer, technology, and governance transparency for legacy wcag 2.0 baseline conformance for broad interoperability and compliance continuity. Evidence should include humans.txt section evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Humans Attribution appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the humans attribution evidence for wcag 2.0 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-20-23","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.0","wcag","w3c","humans-attribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-20 check:23","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.0 success criteria and outcomes; review the humans-attribution evidence dimension for WCAG 2.0 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-20-24","testId":"ni-wcag-20-24","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Agent Policy","description":"Validates agent-policy JSON clarity for allowed, disallowed, and protected operations for legacy wcag 2.0 baseline conformance for broad interoperability and compliance continuity. Evidence should include well-known policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Agent Policy appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the agent policy evidence for wcag 2.0 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-20-24","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.0","wcag","w3c","agent-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-20 check:24","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.0 success criteria and outcomes; review the agent-policy evidence dimension for WCAG 2.0 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-20-25","testId":"ni-wcag-20-25","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Ai Policy","description":"Validates AI policy clarity for training, search, answer use, caching, and attribution for legacy wcag 2.0 baseline conformance for broad interoperability and compliance continuity. Evidence should include well-known AI policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Ai Policy appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ai policy evidence for wcag 2.0 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-20-25","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.0","wcag","w3c","ai-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-20 check:25","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.0 success criteria and outcomes; review the ai-policy evidence dimension for WCAG 2.0 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-20-26","testId":"ni-wcag-20-26","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Trust Policy","description":"Validates trust policy coverage for privacy, traceability, metadata, and protected actions for legacy wcag 2.0 baseline conformance for broad interoperability and compliance continuity. Evidence should include trust.json evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Trust Policy appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the trust policy evidence for wcag 2.0 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-20-26","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.0","wcag","w3c","trust-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-20 check:26","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.0 success criteria and outcomes; review the trust-policy evidence dimension for WCAG 2.0 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-20-27","testId":"ni-wcag-20-27","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Openapi Contract","description":"Validates OpenAPI availability, server URL accuracy, schemas, and auth policy for legacy wcag 2.0 baseline conformance for broad interoperability and compliance continuity. Evidence should include OpenAPI text/JSON evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Openapi Contract appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the openapi contract evidence for wcag 2.0 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-20-27","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.0","wcag","w3c","openapi-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-20 check:27","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.0 success criteria and outcomes; review the openapi-contract evidence dimension for WCAG 2.0 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-20-28","testId":"ni-wcag-20-28","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Mcp Contract","description":"Validates MCP JSON-RPC introspection, real tools, resources, and protected boundaries for legacy wcag 2.0 baseline conformance for broad interoperability and compliance continuity. Evidence should include MCP manifest and initialize evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Mcp Contract appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the mcp contract evidence for wcag 2.0 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-20-28","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.0","wcag","w3c","mcp-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-20 check:28","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.0 success criteria and outcomes; review the mcp-contract evidence dimension for WCAG 2.0 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-20-29","testId":"ni-wcag-20-29","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Api Error Shape","description":"Validates API success/error response shape consistency for legacy wcag 2.0 baseline conformance for broad interoperability and compliance continuity. Evidence should include REST envelope evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Api Error Shape appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the api error shape evidence for wcag 2.0 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-20-29","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.0","wcag","w3c","api-error-shape","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-20 check:29","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.0 success criteria and outcomes; review the api-error-shape evidence dimension for WCAG 2.0 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-20-30","testId":"ni-wcag-20-30","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Traceability","description":"Validates trace propagation, request IDs, and safe observability correlation for legacy wcag 2.0 baseline conformance for broad interoperability and compliance continuity. Evidence should include trace header and metadata evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Traceability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the traceability evidence for wcag 2.0 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-20-30","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.0","wcag","w3c","traceability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-20 check:30","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.0 success criteria and outcomes; review the traceability evidence dimension for WCAG 2.0 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-20-31","testId":"ni-wcag-20-31","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Ja4 Redaction","description":"Validates fingerprint-adjacent metadata redaction and non-public raw JA4 handling for legacy wcag 2.0 baseline conformance for broad interoperability and compliance continuity. Evidence should include metadata policy and redaction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Ja4 Redaction appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the ja4 redaction evidence for wcag 2.0 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-20-31","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.0","wcag","w3c","ja4-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-20 check:31","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.0 success criteria and outcomes; review the ja4-redaction evidence dimension for WCAG 2.0 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-20-32","testId":"ni-wcag-20-32","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Secret Redaction","description":"Validates absence of secrets, generic key examples, cookies, and raw tokens in public outputs for legacy wcag 2.0 baseline conformance for broad interoperability and compliance continuity. Evidence should include public artifact scan evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Secret Redaction appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the secret redaction evidence for wcag 2.0 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-20-32","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.0","wcag","w3c","secret-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-20 check:32","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.0 success criteria and outcomes; review the secret-redaction evidence dimension for WCAG 2.0 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-20-33","testId":"ni-wcag-20-33","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Security Headers","description":"Validates security header coverage and hardened transport signals for legacy wcag 2.0 baseline conformance for broad interoperability and compliance continuity. Evidence should include HTTP header evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Security Headers appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the security headers evidence for wcag 2.0 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-20-33","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.0","wcag","w3c","security-headers","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-20 check:33","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.0 success criteria and outcomes; review the security-headers evidence dimension for WCAG 2.0 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-20-34","testId":"ni-wcag-20-34","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Privacy Consent","description":"Validates privacy policy, consent, attribution, and data-use disclosure quality for legacy wcag 2.0 baseline conformance for broad interoperability and compliance continuity. Evidence should include public page and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Privacy Consent appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the privacy consent evidence for wcag 2.0 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-20-34","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.0","wcag","w3c","privacy-consent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-20 check:34","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.0 success criteria and outcomes; review the privacy-consent evidence dimension for WCAG 2.0 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-20-35","testId":"ni-wcag-20-35","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Structured Data","description":"Validates JSON-LD and entity modeling for machine interpretation for legacy wcag 2.0 baseline conformance for broad interoperability and compliance continuity. Evidence should include schema block and parse evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Structured Data appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the structured data evidence for wcag 2.0 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-20-35","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.0","wcag","w3c","structured-data","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-20 check:35","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.0 success criteria and outcomes; review the structured-data evidence dimension for WCAG 2.0 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-20-36","testId":"ni-wcag-20-36","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Social Preview","description":"Validates Open Graph and Twitter/X card readiness for public sharing for legacy wcag 2.0 baseline conformance for broad interoperability and compliance continuity. Evidence should include meta tag evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Social Preview appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the social preview evidence for wcag 2.0 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-20-36","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.0","wcag","w3c","social-preview","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-20 check:36","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.0 success criteria and outcomes; review the social-preview evidence dimension for WCAG 2.0 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-20-37","testId":"ni-wcag-20-37","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: I18n Routing","description":"Validates locale route, hreflang, language declaration, and translation readiness for legacy wcag 2.0 baseline conformance for broad interoperability and compliance continuity. Evidence should include lang/hreflang and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: I18n Routing appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the i18n routing evidence for wcag 2.0 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-20-37","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.0","wcag","w3c","i18n-routing","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-20 check:37","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.0 success criteria and outcomes; review the i18n-routing evidence dimension for WCAG 2.0 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-20-38","testId":"ni-wcag-20-38","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Readability","description":"Validates human readability, sectioning, sentence complexity, and comprehension support for legacy wcag 2.0 baseline conformance for broad interoperability and compliance continuity. Evidence should include extracted content evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Readability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the readability evidence for wcag 2.0 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-20-38","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.0","wcag","w3c","readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-20 check:38","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.0 success criteria and outcomes; review the readability evidence dimension for WCAG 2.0 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-20-39","testId":"ni-wcag-20-39","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Content Utility","description":"Validates non-placeholder content usefulness and domain-specific public value for legacy wcag 2.0 baseline conformance for broad interoperability and compliance continuity. Evidence should include content extraction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Content Utility appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the content utility evidence for wcag 2.0 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-20-39","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.0","wcag","w3c","content-utility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-20 check:39","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.0 success criteria and outcomes; review the content-utility evidence dimension for WCAG 2.0 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-20-40","testId":"ni-wcag-20-40","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Recommendation Grounding","description":"Validates recommendation grounding in deterministic evidence instead of fabricated model output for legacy wcag 2.0 baseline conformance for broad interoperability and compliance continuity. Evidence should include issue and remediation evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Recommendation Grounding appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the recommendation grounding evidence for wcag 2.0 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-20-40","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.0","wcag","w3c","recommendation-grounding","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-20 check:40","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.0 success criteria and outcomes; review the recommendation-grounding evidence dimension for WCAG 2.0 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-20-41","testId":"ni-wcag-20-41","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Evidence Quality","description":"Validates evidence completeness, public safety, and reproducibility for legacy wcag 2.0 baseline conformance for broad interoperability and compliance continuity. Evidence should include test output and artifact evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Evidence Quality appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the evidence quality evidence for wcag 2.0 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-20-41","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.0","wcag","w3c","evidence-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-20 check:41","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.0 success criteria and outcomes; review the evidence-quality evidence dimension for WCAG 2.0 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-20-42","testId":"ni-wcag-20-42","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Threshold Policy","description":"Validates threshold clarity, pass/warn/fail semantics, and scoring transparency for legacy wcag 2.0 baseline conformance for broad interoperability and compliance continuity. Evidence should include threshold and result status evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Threshold Policy appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the threshold policy evidence for wcag 2.0 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-20-42","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.0","wcag","w3c","threshold-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-20 check:42","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.0 success criteria and outcomes; review the threshold-policy evidence dimension for WCAG 2.0 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-20-43","testId":"ni-wcag-20-43","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Confidence","description":"Validates confidence scoring and degraded-input disclosure for legacy wcag 2.0 baseline conformance for broad interoperability and compliance continuity. Evidence should include source freshness and input availability evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Confidence appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the confidence evidence for wcag 2.0 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-20-43","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.0","wcag","w3c","confidence","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-20 check:43","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.0 success criteria and outcomes; review the confidence evidence dimension for WCAG 2.0 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-20-44","testId":"ni-wcag-20-44","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Trend Readiness","description":"Validates historical comparability and timeline readiness for future reruns for legacy wcag 2.0 baseline conformance for broad interoperability and compliance continuity. Evidence should include analysis ID, timestamp, and persistence evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Trend Readiness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the trend readiness evidence for wcag 2.0 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-20-44","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.0","wcag","w3c","trend-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-20 check:44","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.0 success criteria and outcomes; review the trend-readiness evidence dimension for WCAG 2.0 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-20-45","testId":"ni-wcag-20-45","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Ranking Readiness","description":"Validates ranking input completeness and profile compatibility for legacy wcag 2.0 baseline conformance for broad interoperability and compliance continuity. Evidence should include score and profile evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Ranking Readiness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ranking readiness evidence for wcag 2.0 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-20-45","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.0","wcag","w3c","ranking-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-20 check:45","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.0 success criteria and outcomes; review the ranking-readiness evidence dimension for WCAG 2.0 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-20-46","testId":"ni-wcag-20-46","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Network Contribution","description":"Validates PlatPhorm network contribution through discovery, integrations, and standards compliance for legacy wcag 2.0 baseline conformance for broad interoperability and compliance continuity. Evidence should include network graph and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Network Contribution appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the network contribution evidence for wcag 2.0 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-20-46","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.0","wcag","w3c","network-contribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-20 check:46","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.0 success criteria and outcomes; review the network-contribution evidence dimension for WCAG 2.0 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-20-47","testId":"ni-wcag-20-47","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Report Readiness","description":"Validates report/export categorization with public-safe evidence and protected boundaries for legacy wcag 2.0 baseline conformance for broad interoperability and compliance continuity. Evidence should include report section mapping evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Report Readiness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the report readiness evidence for wcag 2.0 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-20-47","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.0","wcag","w3c","report-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-20 check:47","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.0 success criteria and outcomes; review the report-readiness evidence dimension for WCAG 2.0 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-20-48","testId":"ni-wcag-20-48","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Operator Actionability","description":"Validates clear remediation, owner action, difficulty, and retest path for legacy wcag 2.0 baseline conformance for broad interoperability and compliance continuity. Evidence should include fix instructions and command evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Operator Actionability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the operator actionability evidence for wcag 2.0 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-20-48","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.0","wcag","w3c","operator-actionability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-20 check:48","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.0 success criteria and outcomes; review the operator-actionability evidence dimension for WCAG 2.0 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-20-49","testId":"ni-wcag-20-49","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Degraded State","description":"Validates honest degraded, unavailable, skipped, and not-applicable states for legacy wcag 2.0 baseline conformance for broad interoperability and compliance continuity. Evidence should include status and storage evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Degraded State appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the degraded state evidence for wcag 2.0 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-20-49","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.0","wcag","w3c","degraded-state","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-20 check:49","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.0 success criteria and outcomes; review the degraded-state evidence dimension for WCAG 2.0 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-wcag-20-50","testId":"ni-wcag-20-50","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Reproducibility","description":"Validates stable CLI/API/human reproduction path and deterministic rerun instructions for legacy wcag 2.0 baseline conformance for broad interoperability and compliance continuity. Evidence should include commands and registry version evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 2.0 Coverage: Reproducibility appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the reproducibility evidence for wcag 2.0 coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wcag-20-50","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag-2.0","wcag","w3c","reproducibility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wcag-20 check:50","humanCommand":"Validate site behavior against WCAG 2.0 success criteria and outcomes; review the reproducibility evidence dimension for WCAG 2.0 Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-epub-a11y-11-01","testId":"ni-epub-a11y-11-01","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Availability","description":"Validates public route availability and successful bounded fetch behavior for epub accessibility 1.1 conformance signals for machine-readable publication integrity. Evidence should include HTTP status, timeout, and redirect evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Availability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the availability evidence for epub accessibility 1.1, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-epub-a11y-11-01","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","epub","epub-a11y-1.1","w3c","availability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:epub-a11y-11 check:1","humanCommand":"Evaluate publication and long-form content accessibility against EPUB Accessibility 1.1; review the availability evidence dimension for EPUB Accessibility 1.1"}},{"id":"ni-epub-a11y-11-02","testId":"ni-epub-a11y-11-02","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Public Safety","description":"Validates public-safe access boundaries without exposing private or protected data for epub accessibility 1.1 conformance signals for machine-readable publication integrity. Evidence should include route policy and response-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Public Safety appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the public safety evidence for epub accessibility 1.1, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-epub-a11y-11-02","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","epub","epub-a11y-1.1","w3c","public-safety","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:epub-a11y-11 check:2","humanCommand":"Evaluate publication and long-form content accessibility against EPUB Accessibility 1.1; review the public-safety evidence dimension for EPUB Accessibility 1.1"}},{"id":"ni-epub-a11y-11-03","testId":"ni-epub-a11y-11-03","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Canonical Url","description":"Validates canonical URL stability and normalized route identity for epub accessibility 1.1 conformance signals for machine-readable publication integrity. Evidence should include canonical tags, redirects, and normalized URL evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Canonical Url appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the canonical url evidence for epub accessibility 1.1, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-epub-a11y-11-03","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","epub","epub-a11y-1.1","w3c","canonical-url","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:epub-a11y-11 check:3","humanCommand":"Evaluate publication and long-form content accessibility against EPUB Accessibility 1.1; review the canonical-url evidence dimension for EPUB Accessibility 1.1"}},{"id":"ni-epub-a11y-11-04","testId":"ni-epub-a11y-11-04","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Metadata Clarity","description":"Validates title, description, and page-specific metadata clarity for epub accessibility 1.1 conformance signals for machine-readable publication integrity. Evidence should include HTML metadata and extracted text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Metadata Clarity appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the metadata clarity evidence for epub accessibility 1.1, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-epub-a11y-11-04","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","epub","epub-a11y-1.1","w3c","metadata-clarity","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:epub-a11y-11 check:4","humanCommand":"Evaluate publication and long-form content accessibility against EPUB Accessibility 1.1; review the metadata-clarity evidence dimension for EPUB Accessibility 1.1"}},{"id":"ni-epub-a11y-11-05","testId":"ni-epub-a11y-11-05","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Semantic Structure","description":"Validates semantic HTML structure for humans, agents, and assistive technology for epub accessibility 1.1 conformance signals for machine-readable publication integrity. Evidence should include heading, landmark, and element evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Semantic Structure appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the semantic structure evidence for epub accessibility 1.1, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-epub-a11y-11-05","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","epub","epub-a11y-1.1","w3c","semantic-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:epub-a11y-11 check:5","humanCommand":"Evaluate publication and long-form content accessibility against EPUB Accessibility 1.1; review the semantic-structure evidence dimension for EPUB Accessibility 1.1"}},{"id":"ni-epub-a11y-11-06","testId":"ni-epub-a11y-11-06","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Machine Readability","description":"Validates machine-readable public content and predictable parsing surfaces for epub accessibility 1.1 conformance signals for machine-readable publication integrity. Evidence should include structured tags, JSON-LD, and document-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Machine Readability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the machine readability evidence for epub accessibility 1.1, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-epub-a11y-11-06","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","epub","epub-a11y-1.1","w3c","machine-readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:epub-a11y-11 check:6","humanCommand":"Evaluate publication and long-form content accessibility against EPUB Accessibility 1.1; review the machine-readability evidence dimension for EPUB Accessibility 1.1"}},{"id":"ni-epub-a11y-11-07","testId":"ni-epub-a11y-11-07","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Agent Discovery","description":"Validates agent discovery hints and AI-readable policy/documentation signals for epub accessibility 1.1 conformance signals for machine-readable publication integrity. Evidence should include llms, policy, MCP, OpenAPI, or schema evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Agent Discovery appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the agent discovery evidence for epub accessibility 1.1, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-epub-a11y-11-07","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","epub","epub-a11y-1.1","w3c","agent-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:epub-a11y-11 check:7","humanCommand":"Evaluate publication and long-form content accessibility against EPUB Accessibility 1.1; review the agent-discovery evidence dimension for EPUB Accessibility 1.1"}},{"id":"ni-epub-a11y-11-08","testId":"ni-epub-a11y-11-08","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Crawler Discovery","description":"Validates crawler discovery paths through robots, sitemap, feeds, and canonical links for epub accessibility 1.1 conformance signals for machine-readable publication integrity. Evidence should include discovery artifact and link evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Crawler Discovery appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the crawler discovery evidence for epub accessibility 1.1, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-epub-a11y-11-08","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","epub","epub-a11y-1.1","w3c","crawler-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:epub-a11y-11 check:8","humanCommand":"Evaluate publication and long-form content accessibility against EPUB Accessibility 1.1; review the crawler-discovery evidence dimension for EPUB Accessibility 1.1"}},{"id":"ni-epub-a11y-11-09","testId":"ni-epub-a11y-11-09","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Answerability","description":"Validates direct answer extraction and quotable explanatory content for epub accessibility 1.1 conformance signals for machine-readable publication integrity. Evidence should include question, summary, heading, and paragraph evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Answerability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the answerability evidence for epub accessibility 1.1, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-epub-a11y-11-09","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","epub","epub-a11y-1.1","w3c","answerability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:epub-a11y-11 check:9","humanCommand":"Evaluate publication and long-form content accessibility against EPUB Accessibility 1.1; review the answerability evidence dimension for EPUB Accessibility 1.1"}},{"id":"ni-epub-a11y-11-10","testId":"ni-epub-a11y-11-10","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Generative Context","description":"Validates GEO context quality for generative engines without inventing measured facts for epub accessibility 1.1 conformance signals for machine-readable publication integrity. Evidence should include entity, source, and instruction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Generative Context appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the generative context evidence for epub accessibility 1.1, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-epub-a11y-11-10","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","epub","epub-a11y-1.1","w3c","generative-context","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:epub-a11y-11 check:10","humanCommand":"Evaluate publication and long-form content accessibility against EPUB Accessibility 1.1; review the generative-context evidence dimension for EPUB Accessibility 1.1"}},{"id":"ni-epub-a11y-11-11","testId":"ni-epub-a11y-11-11","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Search Intent","description":"Validates search intent alignment and snippet-friendly content structure for epub accessibility 1.1 conformance signals for machine-readable publication integrity. Evidence should include metadata, headings, and topical text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Search Intent appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the search intent evidence for epub accessibility 1.1, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-epub-a11y-11-11","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","epub","epub-a11y-1.1","w3c","search-intent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:epub-a11y-11 check:11","humanCommand":"Evaluate publication and long-form content accessibility against EPUB Accessibility 1.1; review the search-intent evidence dimension for EPUB Accessibility 1.1"}},{"id":"ni-epub-a11y-11-12","testId":"ni-epub-a11y-11-12","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Accessibility Semantics","description":"Validates accessible names, relationships, landmarks, and keyboard-relevant structure for epub accessibility 1.1 conformance signals for machine-readable publication integrity. Evidence should include ARIA, labels, landmarks, and control evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Accessibility Semantics appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the accessibility semantics evidence for epub accessibility 1.1, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-epub-a11y-11-12","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","epub","epub-a11y-1.1","w3c","accessibility-semantics","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:epub-a11y-11 check:12","humanCommand":"Evaluate publication and long-form content accessibility against EPUB Accessibility 1.1; review the accessibility-semantics evidence dimension for EPUB Accessibility 1.1"}},{"id":"ni-epub-a11y-11-13","testId":"ni-epub-a11y-11-13","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Mobile Readiness","description":"Validates mobile viewport, responsive content, and touch-friendly layout signals for epub accessibility 1.1 conformance signals for machine-readable publication integrity. Evidence should include viewport and responsive asset evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Mobile Readiness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the mobile readiness evidence for epub accessibility 1.1, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-epub-a11y-11-13","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","epub","epub-a11y-1.1","w3c","mobile-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:epub-a11y-11 check:13","humanCommand":"Evaluate publication and long-form content accessibility against EPUB Accessibility 1.1; review the mobile-readiness evidence dimension for EPUB Accessibility 1.1"}},{"id":"ni-epub-a11y-11-14","testId":"ni-epub-a11y-11-14","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Performance Budget","description":"Validates performance budget compliance using measured or bounded deterministic inputs for epub accessibility 1.1 conformance signals for machine-readable publication integrity. Evidence should include timing, byte, and Lighthouse-derived evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Performance Budget appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the performance budget evidence for epub accessibility 1.1, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-epub-a11y-11-14","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","epub","epub-a11y-1.1","w3c","performance-budget","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:epub-a11y-11 check:14","humanCommand":"Evaluate publication and long-form content accessibility against EPUB Accessibility 1.1; review the performance-budget evidence dimension for EPUB Accessibility 1.1"}},{"id":"ni-epub-a11y-11-15","testId":"ni-epub-a11y-11-15","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Resource Efficiency","description":"Validates resource size, script/style count, and optimization opportunity signals for epub accessibility 1.1 conformance signals for machine-readable publication integrity. Evidence should include resource and markup evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Resource Efficiency appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the resource efficiency evidence for epub accessibility 1.1, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-epub-a11y-11-15","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","epub","epub-a11y-1.1","w3c","resource-efficiency","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:epub-a11y-11 check:15","humanCommand":"Evaluate publication and long-form content accessibility against EPUB Accessibility 1.1; review the resource-efficiency evidence dimension for EPUB Accessibility 1.1"}},{"id":"ni-epub-a11y-11-16","testId":"ni-epub-a11y-11-16","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Cache Freshness","description":"Validates cache behavior, freshness hints, and stale-content risk for epub accessibility 1.1 conformance signals for machine-readable publication integrity. Evidence should include HTTP cache and timestamp evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Cache Freshness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the cache freshness evidence for epub accessibility 1.1, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-epub-a11y-11-16","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","epub","epub-a11y-1.1","w3c","cache-freshness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:epub-a11y-11 check:16","humanCommand":"Evaluate publication and long-form content accessibility against EPUB Accessibility 1.1; review the cache-freshness evidence dimension for EPUB Accessibility 1.1"}},{"id":"ni-epub-a11y-11-17","testId":"ni-epub-a11y-11-17","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Route Reliability","description":"Validates route reliability, redirect safety, and dead-link risk for epub accessibility 1.1 conformance signals for machine-readable publication integrity. Evidence should include status, redirect, and sitemap evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Route Reliability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the route reliability evidence for epub accessibility 1.1, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-epub-a11y-11-17","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","epub","epub-a11y-1.1","w3c","route-reliability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:epub-a11y-11 check:17","humanCommand":"Evaluate publication and long-form content accessibility against EPUB Accessibility 1.1; review the route-reliability evidence dimension for EPUB Accessibility 1.1"}},{"id":"ni-epub-a11y-11-18","testId":"ni-epub-a11y-11-18","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Feed Quality","description":"Validates RSS/Atom/feed usefulness, parseability, and freshness for epub accessibility 1.1 conformance signals for machine-readable publication integrity. Evidence should include feed XML and item evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Feed Quality appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the feed quality evidence for epub accessibility 1.1, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-epub-a11y-11-18","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","epub","epub-a11y-1.1","w3c","feed-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:epub-a11y-11 check:18","humanCommand":"Evaluate publication and long-form content accessibility against EPUB Accessibility 1.1; review the feed-quality evidence dimension for EPUB Accessibility 1.1"}},{"id":"ni-epub-a11y-11-19","testId":"ni-epub-a11y-11-19","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Sitemap Quality","description":"Validates sitemap validity, public-safe URL coverage, and no-dead-link policy for epub accessibility 1.1 conformance signals for machine-readable publication integrity. Evidence should include sitemap XML and bounded link-check evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Sitemap Quality appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the sitemap quality evidence for epub accessibility 1.1, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-epub-a11y-11-19","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","epub","epub-a11y-1.1","w3c","sitemap-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:epub-a11y-11 check:19","humanCommand":"Evaluate publication and long-form content accessibility against EPUB Accessibility 1.1; review the sitemap-quality evidence dimension for EPUB Accessibility 1.1"}},{"id":"ni-epub-a11y-11-20","testId":"ni-epub-a11y-11-20","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Robots Alignment","description":"Validates robots.txt alignment with public/protected policy and sitemap discovery for epub accessibility 1.1 conformance signals for machine-readable publication integrity. Evidence should include robots directives and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Robots Alignment appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the robots alignment evidence for epub accessibility 1.1, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-epub-a11y-11-20","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","epub","epub-a11y-1.1","w3c","robots-alignment","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:epub-a11y-11 check:20","humanCommand":"Evaluate publication and long-form content accessibility against EPUB Accessibility 1.1; review the robots-alignment evidence dimension for EPUB Accessibility 1.1"}},{"id":"ni-epub-a11y-11-21","testId":"ni-epub-a11y-11-21","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Llms Structure","description":"Validates llms.txt structure, readability, endpoint coverage, and agent usefulness for epub accessibility 1.1 conformance signals for machine-readable publication integrity. Evidence should include plain-text section and line-length evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Llms Structure appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms structure evidence for epub accessibility 1.1, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-epub-a11y-11-21","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","epub","epub-a11y-1.1","w3c","llms-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:epub-a11y-11 check:21","humanCommand":"Evaluate publication and long-form content accessibility against EPUB Accessibility 1.1; review the llms-structure evidence dimension for EPUB Accessibility 1.1"}},{"id":"ni-epub-a11y-11-22","testId":"ni-epub-a11y-11-22","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Llms Index Schema","description":"Validates llms-index JSON schema shape and count reconciliation for epub accessibility 1.1 conformance signals for machine-readable publication integrity. Evidence should include JSON keys, counts, and endpoint evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Llms Index Schema appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms index schema evidence for epub accessibility 1.1, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-epub-a11y-11-22","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","epub","epub-a11y-1.1","w3c","llms-index-schema","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:epub-a11y-11 check:22","humanCommand":"Evaluate publication and long-form content accessibility against EPUB Accessibility 1.1; review the llms-index-schema evidence dimension for EPUB Accessibility 1.1"}},{"id":"ni-epub-a11y-11-23","testId":"ni-epub-a11y-11-23","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Humans Attribution","description":"Validates humans.txt attribution, maintainer, technology, and governance transparency for epub accessibility 1.1 conformance signals for machine-readable publication integrity. Evidence should include humans.txt section evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Humans Attribution appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the humans attribution evidence for epub accessibility 1.1, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-epub-a11y-11-23","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","epub","epub-a11y-1.1","w3c","humans-attribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:epub-a11y-11 check:23","humanCommand":"Evaluate publication and long-form content accessibility against EPUB Accessibility 1.1; review the humans-attribution evidence dimension for EPUB Accessibility 1.1"}},{"id":"ni-epub-a11y-11-24","testId":"ni-epub-a11y-11-24","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Agent Policy","description":"Validates agent-policy JSON clarity for allowed, disallowed, and protected operations for epub accessibility 1.1 conformance signals for machine-readable publication integrity. Evidence should include well-known policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Agent Policy appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the agent policy evidence for epub accessibility 1.1, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-epub-a11y-11-24","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","epub","epub-a11y-1.1","w3c","agent-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:epub-a11y-11 check:24","humanCommand":"Evaluate publication and long-form content accessibility against EPUB Accessibility 1.1; review the agent-policy evidence dimension for EPUB Accessibility 1.1"}},{"id":"ni-epub-a11y-11-25","testId":"ni-epub-a11y-11-25","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Ai Policy","description":"Validates AI policy clarity for training, search, answer use, caching, and attribution for epub accessibility 1.1 conformance signals for machine-readable publication integrity. Evidence should include well-known AI policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Ai Policy appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ai policy evidence for epub accessibility 1.1, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-epub-a11y-11-25","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","epub","epub-a11y-1.1","w3c","ai-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:epub-a11y-11 check:25","humanCommand":"Evaluate publication and long-form content accessibility against EPUB Accessibility 1.1; review the ai-policy evidence dimension for EPUB Accessibility 1.1"}},{"id":"ni-epub-a11y-11-26","testId":"ni-epub-a11y-11-26","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Trust Policy","description":"Validates trust policy coverage for privacy, traceability, metadata, and protected actions for epub accessibility 1.1 conformance signals for machine-readable publication integrity. Evidence should include trust.json evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Trust Policy appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the trust policy evidence for epub accessibility 1.1, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-epub-a11y-11-26","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","epub","epub-a11y-1.1","w3c","trust-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:epub-a11y-11 check:26","humanCommand":"Evaluate publication and long-form content accessibility against EPUB Accessibility 1.1; review the trust-policy evidence dimension for EPUB Accessibility 1.1"}},{"id":"ni-epub-a11y-11-27","testId":"ni-epub-a11y-11-27","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Openapi Contract","description":"Validates OpenAPI availability, server URL accuracy, schemas, and auth policy for epub accessibility 1.1 conformance signals for machine-readable publication integrity. Evidence should include OpenAPI text/JSON evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Openapi Contract appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the openapi contract evidence for epub accessibility 1.1, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-epub-a11y-11-27","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","epub","epub-a11y-1.1","w3c","openapi-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:epub-a11y-11 check:27","humanCommand":"Evaluate publication and long-form content accessibility against EPUB Accessibility 1.1; review the openapi-contract evidence dimension for EPUB Accessibility 1.1"}},{"id":"ni-epub-a11y-11-28","testId":"ni-epub-a11y-11-28","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Mcp Contract","description":"Validates MCP JSON-RPC introspection, real tools, resources, and protected boundaries for epub accessibility 1.1 conformance signals for machine-readable publication integrity. Evidence should include MCP manifest and initialize evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Mcp Contract appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the mcp contract evidence for epub accessibility 1.1, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-epub-a11y-11-28","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","epub","epub-a11y-1.1","w3c","mcp-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:epub-a11y-11 check:28","humanCommand":"Evaluate publication and long-form content accessibility against EPUB Accessibility 1.1; review the mcp-contract evidence dimension for EPUB Accessibility 1.1"}},{"id":"ni-epub-a11y-11-29","testId":"ni-epub-a11y-11-29","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Api Error Shape","description":"Validates API success/error response shape consistency for epub accessibility 1.1 conformance signals for machine-readable publication integrity. Evidence should include REST envelope evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Api Error Shape appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the api error shape evidence for epub accessibility 1.1, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-epub-a11y-11-29","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","epub","epub-a11y-1.1","w3c","api-error-shape","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:epub-a11y-11 check:29","humanCommand":"Evaluate publication and long-form content accessibility against EPUB Accessibility 1.1; review the api-error-shape evidence dimension for EPUB Accessibility 1.1"}},{"id":"ni-epub-a11y-11-30","testId":"ni-epub-a11y-11-30","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Traceability","description":"Validates trace propagation, request IDs, and safe observability correlation for epub accessibility 1.1 conformance signals for machine-readable publication integrity. Evidence should include trace header and metadata evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Traceability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the traceability evidence for epub accessibility 1.1, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-epub-a11y-11-30","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","epub","epub-a11y-1.1","w3c","traceability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:epub-a11y-11 check:30","humanCommand":"Evaluate publication and long-form content accessibility against EPUB Accessibility 1.1; review the traceability evidence dimension for EPUB Accessibility 1.1"}},{"id":"ni-epub-a11y-11-31","testId":"ni-epub-a11y-11-31","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Ja4 Redaction","description":"Validates fingerprint-adjacent metadata redaction and non-public raw JA4 handling for epub accessibility 1.1 conformance signals for machine-readable publication integrity. Evidence should include metadata policy and redaction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Ja4 Redaction appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the ja4 redaction evidence for epub accessibility 1.1, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-epub-a11y-11-31","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","epub","epub-a11y-1.1","w3c","ja4-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:epub-a11y-11 check:31","humanCommand":"Evaluate publication and long-form content accessibility against EPUB Accessibility 1.1; review the ja4-redaction evidence dimension for EPUB Accessibility 1.1"}},{"id":"ni-epub-a11y-11-32","testId":"ni-epub-a11y-11-32","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Secret Redaction","description":"Validates absence of secrets, generic key examples, cookies, and raw tokens in public outputs for epub accessibility 1.1 conformance signals for machine-readable publication integrity. Evidence should include public artifact scan evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Secret Redaction appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the secret redaction evidence for epub accessibility 1.1, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-epub-a11y-11-32","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","epub","epub-a11y-1.1","w3c","secret-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:epub-a11y-11 check:32","humanCommand":"Evaluate publication and long-form content accessibility against EPUB Accessibility 1.1; review the secret-redaction evidence dimension for EPUB Accessibility 1.1"}},{"id":"ni-epub-a11y-11-33","testId":"ni-epub-a11y-11-33","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Security Headers","description":"Validates security header coverage and hardened transport signals for epub accessibility 1.1 conformance signals for machine-readable publication integrity. Evidence should include HTTP header evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Security Headers appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the security headers evidence for epub accessibility 1.1, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-epub-a11y-11-33","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","epub","epub-a11y-1.1","w3c","security-headers","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:epub-a11y-11 check:33","humanCommand":"Evaluate publication and long-form content accessibility against EPUB Accessibility 1.1; review the security-headers evidence dimension for EPUB Accessibility 1.1"}},{"id":"ni-epub-a11y-11-34","testId":"ni-epub-a11y-11-34","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Privacy Consent","description":"Validates privacy policy, consent, attribution, and data-use disclosure quality for epub accessibility 1.1 conformance signals for machine-readable publication integrity. Evidence should include public page and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Privacy Consent appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the privacy consent evidence for epub accessibility 1.1, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-epub-a11y-11-34","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","epub","epub-a11y-1.1","w3c","privacy-consent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:epub-a11y-11 check:34","humanCommand":"Evaluate publication and long-form content accessibility against EPUB Accessibility 1.1; review the privacy-consent evidence dimension for EPUB Accessibility 1.1"}},{"id":"ni-epub-a11y-11-35","testId":"ni-epub-a11y-11-35","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Structured Data","description":"Validates JSON-LD and entity modeling for machine interpretation for epub accessibility 1.1 conformance signals for machine-readable publication integrity. Evidence should include schema block and parse evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Structured Data appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the structured data evidence for epub accessibility 1.1, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-epub-a11y-11-35","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","epub","epub-a11y-1.1","w3c","structured-data","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:epub-a11y-11 check:35","humanCommand":"Evaluate publication and long-form content accessibility against EPUB Accessibility 1.1; review the structured-data evidence dimension for EPUB Accessibility 1.1"}},{"id":"ni-epub-a11y-11-36","testId":"ni-epub-a11y-11-36","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Social Preview","description":"Validates Open Graph and Twitter/X card readiness for public sharing for epub accessibility 1.1 conformance signals for machine-readable publication integrity. Evidence should include meta tag evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Social Preview appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the social preview evidence for epub accessibility 1.1, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-epub-a11y-11-36","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","epub","epub-a11y-1.1","w3c","social-preview","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:epub-a11y-11 check:36","humanCommand":"Evaluate publication and long-form content accessibility against EPUB Accessibility 1.1; review the social-preview evidence dimension for EPUB Accessibility 1.1"}},{"id":"ni-epub-a11y-11-37","testId":"ni-epub-a11y-11-37","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: I18n Routing","description":"Validates locale route, hreflang, language declaration, and translation readiness for epub accessibility 1.1 conformance signals for machine-readable publication integrity. Evidence should include lang/hreflang and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: I18n Routing appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the i18n routing evidence for epub accessibility 1.1, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-epub-a11y-11-37","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","epub","epub-a11y-1.1","w3c","i18n-routing","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:epub-a11y-11 check:37","humanCommand":"Evaluate publication and long-form content accessibility against EPUB Accessibility 1.1; review the i18n-routing evidence dimension for EPUB Accessibility 1.1"}},{"id":"ni-epub-a11y-11-38","testId":"ni-epub-a11y-11-38","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Readability","description":"Validates human readability, sectioning, sentence complexity, and comprehension support for epub accessibility 1.1 conformance signals for machine-readable publication integrity. Evidence should include extracted content evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Readability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the readability evidence for epub accessibility 1.1, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-epub-a11y-11-38","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","epub","epub-a11y-1.1","w3c","readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:epub-a11y-11 check:38","humanCommand":"Evaluate publication and long-form content accessibility against EPUB Accessibility 1.1; review the readability evidence dimension for EPUB Accessibility 1.1"}},{"id":"ni-epub-a11y-11-39","testId":"ni-epub-a11y-11-39","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Content Utility","description":"Validates non-placeholder content usefulness and domain-specific public value for epub accessibility 1.1 conformance signals for machine-readable publication integrity. Evidence should include content extraction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Content Utility appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the content utility evidence for epub accessibility 1.1, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-epub-a11y-11-39","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","epub","epub-a11y-1.1","w3c","content-utility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:epub-a11y-11 check:39","humanCommand":"Evaluate publication and long-form content accessibility against EPUB Accessibility 1.1; review the content-utility evidence dimension for EPUB Accessibility 1.1"}},{"id":"ni-epub-a11y-11-40","testId":"ni-epub-a11y-11-40","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Recommendation Grounding","description":"Validates recommendation grounding in deterministic evidence instead of fabricated model output for epub accessibility 1.1 conformance signals for machine-readable publication integrity. Evidence should include issue and remediation evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Recommendation Grounding appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the recommendation grounding evidence for epub accessibility 1.1, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-epub-a11y-11-40","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","epub","epub-a11y-1.1","w3c","recommendation-grounding","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:epub-a11y-11 check:40","humanCommand":"Evaluate publication and long-form content accessibility against EPUB Accessibility 1.1; review the recommendation-grounding evidence dimension for EPUB Accessibility 1.1"}},{"id":"ni-epub-a11y-11-41","testId":"ni-epub-a11y-11-41","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Evidence Quality","description":"Validates evidence completeness, public safety, and reproducibility for epub accessibility 1.1 conformance signals for machine-readable publication integrity. Evidence should include test output and artifact evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Evidence Quality appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the evidence quality evidence for epub accessibility 1.1, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-epub-a11y-11-41","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","epub","epub-a11y-1.1","w3c","evidence-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:epub-a11y-11 check:41","humanCommand":"Evaluate publication and long-form content accessibility against EPUB Accessibility 1.1; review the evidence-quality evidence dimension for EPUB Accessibility 1.1"}},{"id":"ni-epub-a11y-11-42","testId":"ni-epub-a11y-11-42","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Threshold Policy","description":"Validates threshold clarity, pass/warn/fail semantics, and scoring transparency for epub accessibility 1.1 conformance signals for machine-readable publication integrity. Evidence should include threshold and result status evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Threshold Policy appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the threshold policy evidence for epub accessibility 1.1, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-epub-a11y-11-42","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","epub","epub-a11y-1.1","w3c","threshold-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:epub-a11y-11 check:42","humanCommand":"Evaluate publication and long-form content accessibility against EPUB Accessibility 1.1; review the threshold-policy evidence dimension for EPUB Accessibility 1.1"}},{"id":"ni-epub-a11y-11-43","testId":"ni-epub-a11y-11-43","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Confidence","description":"Validates confidence scoring and degraded-input disclosure for epub accessibility 1.1 conformance signals for machine-readable publication integrity. Evidence should include source freshness and input availability evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Confidence appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the confidence evidence for epub accessibility 1.1, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-epub-a11y-11-43","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","epub","epub-a11y-1.1","w3c","confidence","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:epub-a11y-11 check:43","humanCommand":"Evaluate publication and long-form content accessibility against EPUB Accessibility 1.1; review the confidence evidence dimension for EPUB Accessibility 1.1"}},{"id":"ni-epub-a11y-11-44","testId":"ni-epub-a11y-11-44","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Trend Readiness","description":"Validates historical comparability and timeline readiness for future reruns for epub accessibility 1.1 conformance signals for machine-readable publication integrity. Evidence should include analysis ID, timestamp, and persistence evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Trend Readiness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the trend readiness evidence for epub accessibility 1.1, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-epub-a11y-11-44","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","epub","epub-a11y-1.1","w3c","trend-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:epub-a11y-11 check:44","humanCommand":"Evaluate publication and long-form content accessibility against EPUB Accessibility 1.1; review the trend-readiness evidence dimension for EPUB Accessibility 1.1"}},{"id":"ni-epub-a11y-11-45","testId":"ni-epub-a11y-11-45","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Ranking Readiness","description":"Validates ranking input completeness and profile compatibility for epub accessibility 1.1 conformance signals for machine-readable publication integrity. Evidence should include score and profile evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Ranking Readiness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ranking readiness evidence for epub accessibility 1.1, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-epub-a11y-11-45","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","epub","epub-a11y-1.1","w3c","ranking-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:epub-a11y-11 check:45","humanCommand":"Evaluate publication and long-form content accessibility against EPUB Accessibility 1.1; review the ranking-readiness evidence dimension for EPUB Accessibility 1.1"}},{"id":"ni-epub-a11y-11-46","testId":"ni-epub-a11y-11-46","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Network Contribution","description":"Validates PlatPhorm network contribution through discovery, integrations, and standards compliance for epub accessibility 1.1 conformance signals for machine-readable publication integrity. Evidence should include network graph and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Network Contribution appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the network contribution evidence for epub accessibility 1.1, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-epub-a11y-11-46","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","epub","epub-a11y-1.1","w3c","network-contribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:epub-a11y-11 check:46","humanCommand":"Evaluate publication and long-form content accessibility against EPUB Accessibility 1.1; review the network-contribution evidence dimension for EPUB Accessibility 1.1"}},{"id":"ni-epub-a11y-11-47","testId":"ni-epub-a11y-11-47","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Report Readiness","description":"Validates report/export categorization with public-safe evidence and protected boundaries for epub accessibility 1.1 conformance signals for machine-readable publication integrity. Evidence should include report section mapping evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Report Readiness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the report readiness evidence for epub accessibility 1.1, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-epub-a11y-11-47","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","epub","epub-a11y-1.1","w3c","report-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:epub-a11y-11 check:47","humanCommand":"Evaluate publication and long-form content accessibility against EPUB Accessibility 1.1; review the report-readiness evidence dimension for EPUB Accessibility 1.1"}},{"id":"ni-epub-a11y-11-48","testId":"ni-epub-a11y-11-48","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Operator Actionability","description":"Validates clear remediation, owner action, difficulty, and retest path for epub accessibility 1.1 conformance signals for machine-readable publication integrity. Evidence should include fix instructions and command evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Operator Actionability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the operator actionability evidence for epub accessibility 1.1, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-epub-a11y-11-48","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","epub","epub-a11y-1.1","w3c","operator-actionability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:epub-a11y-11 check:48","humanCommand":"Evaluate publication and long-form content accessibility against EPUB Accessibility 1.1; review the operator-actionability evidence dimension for EPUB Accessibility 1.1"}},{"id":"ni-epub-a11y-11-49","testId":"ni-epub-a11y-11-49","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Degraded State","description":"Validates honest degraded, unavailable, skipped, and not-applicable states for epub accessibility 1.1 conformance signals for machine-readable publication integrity. Evidence should include status and storage evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Degraded State appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the degraded state evidence for epub accessibility 1.1, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-epub-a11y-11-49","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","epub","epub-a11y-1.1","w3c","degraded-state","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:epub-a11y-11 check:49","humanCommand":"Evaluate publication and long-form content accessibility against EPUB Accessibility 1.1; review the degraded-state evidence dimension for EPUB Accessibility 1.1"}},{"id":"ni-epub-a11y-11-50","testId":"ni-epub-a11y-11-50","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Reproducibility","description":"Validates stable CLI/API/human reproduction path and deterministic rerun instructions for epub accessibility 1.1 conformance signals for machine-readable publication integrity. Evidence should include commands and registry version evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"EPUB Accessibility 1.1: Reproducibility appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the reproducibility evidence for epub accessibility 1.1, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-epub-a11y-11-50","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","epub","epub-a11y-1.1","w3c","reproducibility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:epub-a11y-11 check:50","humanCommand":"Evaluate publication and long-form content accessibility against EPUB Accessibility 1.1; review the reproducibility evidence dimension for EPUB Accessibility 1.1"}},{"id":"ni-wai-master-01","testId":"ni-wai-master-01","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Availability","description":"Validates public route availability and successful bounded fetch behavior for cross-standard coverage alignment across the W3C WAI standards and guidelines catalog. Evidence should include HTTP status, timeout, and redirect evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Availability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the availability evidence for w3c wai standards matrix, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-master-01","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai","w3c","standards-matrix","availability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-master check:1","humanCommand":"Map accessibility evidence against the full WAI standards and guidelines matrix; review the availability evidence dimension for W3C WAI Standards Matrix"}},{"id":"ni-wai-master-02","testId":"ni-wai-master-02","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Public Safety","description":"Validates public-safe access boundaries without exposing private or protected data for cross-standard coverage alignment across the W3C WAI standards and guidelines catalog. Evidence should include route policy and response-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Public Safety appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the public safety evidence for w3c wai standards matrix, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-master-02","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai","w3c","standards-matrix","public-safety","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-master check:2","humanCommand":"Map accessibility evidence against the full WAI standards and guidelines matrix; review the public-safety evidence dimension for W3C WAI Standards Matrix"}},{"id":"ni-wai-master-03","testId":"ni-wai-master-03","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Canonical Url","description":"Validates canonical URL stability and normalized route identity for cross-standard coverage alignment across the W3C WAI standards and guidelines catalog. Evidence should include canonical tags, redirects, and normalized URL evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Canonical Url appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the canonical url evidence for w3c wai standards matrix, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-master-03","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai","w3c","standards-matrix","canonical-url","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-master check:3","humanCommand":"Map accessibility evidence against the full WAI standards and guidelines matrix; review the canonical-url evidence dimension for W3C WAI Standards Matrix"}},{"id":"ni-wai-master-04","testId":"ni-wai-master-04","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Metadata Clarity","description":"Validates title, description, and page-specific metadata clarity for cross-standard coverage alignment across the W3C WAI standards and guidelines catalog. Evidence should include HTML metadata and extracted text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Metadata Clarity appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the metadata clarity evidence for w3c wai standards matrix, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-master-04","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai","w3c","standards-matrix","metadata-clarity","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-master check:4","humanCommand":"Map accessibility evidence against the full WAI standards and guidelines matrix; review the metadata-clarity evidence dimension for W3C WAI Standards Matrix"}},{"id":"ni-wai-master-05","testId":"ni-wai-master-05","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Semantic Structure","description":"Validates semantic HTML structure for humans, agents, and assistive technology for cross-standard coverage alignment across the W3C WAI standards and guidelines catalog. Evidence should include heading, landmark, and element evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Semantic Structure appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the semantic structure evidence for w3c wai standards matrix, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-master-05","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai","w3c","standards-matrix","semantic-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-master check:5","humanCommand":"Map accessibility evidence against the full WAI standards and guidelines matrix; review the semantic-structure evidence dimension for W3C WAI Standards Matrix"}},{"id":"ni-wai-master-06","testId":"ni-wai-master-06","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Machine Readability","description":"Validates machine-readable public content and predictable parsing surfaces for cross-standard coverage alignment across the W3C WAI standards and guidelines catalog. Evidence should include structured tags, JSON-LD, and document-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Machine Readability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the machine readability evidence for w3c wai standards matrix, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-master-06","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai","w3c","standards-matrix","machine-readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-master check:6","humanCommand":"Map accessibility evidence against the full WAI standards and guidelines matrix; review the machine-readability evidence dimension for W3C WAI Standards Matrix"}},{"id":"ni-wai-master-07","testId":"ni-wai-master-07","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Agent Discovery","description":"Validates agent discovery hints and AI-readable policy/documentation signals for cross-standard coverage alignment across the W3C WAI standards and guidelines catalog. Evidence should include llms, policy, MCP, OpenAPI, or schema evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Agent Discovery appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the agent discovery evidence for w3c wai standards matrix, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-master-07","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai","w3c","standards-matrix","agent-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-master check:7","humanCommand":"Map accessibility evidence against the full WAI standards and guidelines matrix; review the agent-discovery evidence dimension for W3C WAI Standards Matrix"}},{"id":"ni-wai-master-08","testId":"ni-wai-master-08","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Crawler Discovery","description":"Validates crawler discovery paths through robots, sitemap, feeds, and canonical links for cross-standard coverage alignment across the W3C WAI standards and guidelines catalog. Evidence should include discovery artifact and link evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Crawler Discovery appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the crawler discovery evidence for w3c wai standards matrix, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-master-08","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai","w3c","standards-matrix","crawler-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-master check:8","humanCommand":"Map accessibility evidence against the full WAI standards and guidelines matrix; review the crawler-discovery evidence dimension for W3C WAI Standards Matrix"}},{"id":"ni-wai-master-09","testId":"ni-wai-master-09","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Answerability","description":"Validates direct answer extraction and quotable explanatory content for cross-standard coverage alignment across the W3C WAI standards and guidelines catalog. Evidence should include question, summary, heading, and paragraph evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Answerability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the answerability evidence for w3c wai standards matrix, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-master-09","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai","w3c","standards-matrix","answerability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-master check:9","humanCommand":"Map accessibility evidence against the full WAI standards and guidelines matrix; review the answerability evidence dimension for W3C WAI Standards Matrix"}},{"id":"ni-wai-master-10","testId":"ni-wai-master-10","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Generative Context","description":"Validates GEO context quality for generative engines without inventing measured facts for cross-standard coverage alignment across the W3C WAI standards and guidelines catalog. Evidence should include entity, source, and instruction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Generative Context appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the generative context evidence for w3c wai standards matrix, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-master-10","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai","w3c","standards-matrix","generative-context","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-master check:10","humanCommand":"Map accessibility evidence against the full WAI standards and guidelines matrix; review the generative-context evidence dimension for W3C WAI Standards Matrix"}},{"id":"ni-wai-master-11","testId":"ni-wai-master-11","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Search Intent","description":"Validates search intent alignment and snippet-friendly content structure for cross-standard coverage alignment across the W3C WAI standards and guidelines catalog. Evidence should include metadata, headings, and topical text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Search Intent appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the search intent evidence for w3c wai standards matrix, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-master-11","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai","w3c","standards-matrix","search-intent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-master check:11","humanCommand":"Map accessibility evidence against the full WAI standards and guidelines matrix; review the search-intent evidence dimension for W3C WAI Standards Matrix"}},{"id":"ni-wai-master-12","testId":"ni-wai-master-12","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Accessibility Semantics","description":"Validates accessible names, relationships, landmarks, and keyboard-relevant structure for cross-standard coverage alignment across the W3C WAI standards and guidelines catalog. Evidence should include ARIA, labels, landmarks, and control evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Accessibility Semantics appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the accessibility semantics evidence for w3c wai standards matrix, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-master-12","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai","w3c","standards-matrix","accessibility-semantics","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-master check:12","humanCommand":"Map accessibility evidence against the full WAI standards and guidelines matrix; review the accessibility-semantics evidence dimension for W3C WAI Standards Matrix"}},{"id":"ni-wai-master-13","testId":"ni-wai-master-13","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Mobile Readiness","description":"Validates mobile viewport, responsive content, and touch-friendly layout signals for cross-standard coverage alignment across the W3C WAI standards and guidelines catalog. Evidence should include viewport and responsive asset evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Mobile Readiness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the mobile readiness evidence for w3c wai standards matrix, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-master-13","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai","w3c","standards-matrix","mobile-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-master check:13","humanCommand":"Map accessibility evidence against the full WAI standards and guidelines matrix; review the mobile-readiness evidence dimension for W3C WAI Standards Matrix"}},{"id":"ni-wai-master-14","testId":"ni-wai-master-14","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Performance Budget","description":"Validates performance budget compliance using measured or bounded deterministic inputs for cross-standard coverage alignment across the W3C WAI standards and guidelines catalog. Evidence should include timing, byte, and Lighthouse-derived evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Performance Budget appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the performance budget evidence for w3c wai standards matrix, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-master-14","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai","w3c","standards-matrix","performance-budget","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-master check:14","humanCommand":"Map accessibility evidence against the full WAI standards and guidelines matrix; review the performance-budget evidence dimension for W3C WAI Standards Matrix"}},{"id":"ni-wai-master-15","testId":"ni-wai-master-15","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Resource Efficiency","description":"Validates resource size, script/style count, and optimization opportunity signals for cross-standard coverage alignment across the W3C WAI standards and guidelines catalog. Evidence should include resource and markup evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Resource Efficiency appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the resource efficiency evidence for w3c wai standards matrix, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-master-15","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai","w3c","standards-matrix","resource-efficiency","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-master check:15","humanCommand":"Map accessibility evidence against the full WAI standards and guidelines matrix; review the resource-efficiency evidence dimension for W3C WAI Standards Matrix"}},{"id":"ni-wai-master-16","testId":"ni-wai-master-16","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Cache Freshness","description":"Validates cache behavior, freshness hints, and stale-content risk for cross-standard coverage alignment across the W3C WAI standards and guidelines catalog. Evidence should include HTTP cache and timestamp evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Cache Freshness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the cache freshness evidence for w3c wai standards matrix, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-master-16","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai","w3c","standards-matrix","cache-freshness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-master check:16","humanCommand":"Map accessibility evidence against the full WAI standards and guidelines matrix; review the cache-freshness evidence dimension for W3C WAI Standards Matrix"}},{"id":"ni-wai-master-17","testId":"ni-wai-master-17","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Route Reliability","description":"Validates route reliability, redirect safety, and dead-link risk for cross-standard coverage alignment across the W3C WAI standards and guidelines catalog. Evidence should include status, redirect, and sitemap evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Route Reliability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the route reliability evidence for w3c wai standards matrix, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-master-17","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai","w3c","standards-matrix","route-reliability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-master check:17","humanCommand":"Map accessibility evidence against the full WAI standards and guidelines matrix; review the route-reliability evidence dimension for W3C WAI Standards Matrix"}},{"id":"ni-wai-master-18","testId":"ni-wai-master-18","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Feed Quality","description":"Validates RSS/Atom/feed usefulness, parseability, and freshness for cross-standard coverage alignment across the W3C WAI standards and guidelines catalog. Evidence should include feed XML and item evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Feed Quality appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the feed quality evidence for w3c wai standards matrix, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-master-18","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai","w3c","standards-matrix","feed-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-master check:18","humanCommand":"Map accessibility evidence against the full WAI standards and guidelines matrix; review the feed-quality evidence dimension for W3C WAI Standards Matrix"}},{"id":"ni-wai-master-19","testId":"ni-wai-master-19","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Sitemap Quality","description":"Validates sitemap validity, public-safe URL coverage, and no-dead-link policy for cross-standard coverage alignment across the W3C WAI standards and guidelines catalog. Evidence should include sitemap XML and bounded link-check evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Sitemap Quality appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the sitemap quality evidence for w3c wai standards matrix, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-master-19","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai","w3c","standards-matrix","sitemap-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-master check:19","humanCommand":"Map accessibility evidence against the full WAI standards and guidelines matrix; review the sitemap-quality evidence dimension for W3C WAI Standards Matrix"}},{"id":"ni-wai-master-20","testId":"ni-wai-master-20","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Robots Alignment","description":"Validates robots.txt alignment with public/protected policy and sitemap discovery for cross-standard coverage alignment across the W3C WAI standards and guidelines catalog. Evidence should include robots directives and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Robots Alignment appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the robots alignment evidence for w3c wai standards matrix, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-master-20","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai","w3c","standards-matrix","robots-alignment","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-master check:20","humanCommand":"Map accessibility evidence against the full WAI standards and guidelines matrix; review the robots-alignment evidence dimension for W3C WAI Standards Matrix"}},{"id":"ni-wai-master-21","testId":"ni-wai-master-21","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Llms Structure","description":"Validates llms.txt structure, readability, endpoint coverage, and agent usefulness for cross-standard coverage alignment across the W3C WAI standards and guidelines catalog. Evidence should include plain-text section and line-length evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Llms Structure appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms structure evidence for w3c wai standards matrix, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-master-21","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai","w3c","standards-matrix","llms-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-master check:21","humanCommand":"Map accessibility evidence against the full WAI standards and guidelines matrix; review the llms-structure evidence dimension for W3C WAI Standards Matrix"}},{"id":"ni-wai-master-22","testId":"ni-wai-master-22","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Llms Index Schema","description":"Validates llms-index JSON schema shape and count reconciliation for cross-standard coverage alignment across the W3C WAI standards and guidelines catalog. Evidence should include JSON keys, counts, and endpoint evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Llms Index Schema appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms index schema evidence for w3c wai standards matrix, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-master-22","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai","w3c","standards-matrix","llms-index-schema","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-master check:22","humanCommand":"Map accessibility evidence against the full WAI standards and guidelines matrix; review the llms-index-schema evidence dimension for W3C WAI Standards Matrix"}},{"id":"ni-wai-master-23","testId":"ni-wai-master-23","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Humans Attribution","description":"Validates humans.txt attribution, maintainer, technology, and governance transparency for cross-standard coverage alignment across the W3C WAI standards and guidelines catalog. Evidence should include humans.txt section evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Humans Attribution appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the humans attribution evidence for w3c wai standards matrix, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-master-23","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai","w3c","standards-matrix","humans-attribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-master check:23","humanCommand":"Map accessibility evidence against the full WAI standards and guidelines matrix; review the humans-attribution evidence dimension for W3C WAI Standards Matrix"}},{"id":"ni-wai-master-24","testId":"ni-wai-master-24","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Agent Policy","description":"Validates agent-policy JSON clarity for allowed, disallowed, and protected operations for cross-standard coverage alignment across the W3C WAI standards and guidelines catalog. Evidence should include well-known policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Agent Policy appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the agent policy evidence for w3c wai standards matrix, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-master-24","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai","w3c","standards-matrix","agent-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-master check:24","humanCommand":"Map accessibility evidence against the full WAI standards and guidelines matrix; review the agent-policy evidence dimension for W3C WAI Standards Matrix"}},{"id":"ni-wai-master-25","testId":"ni-wai-master-25","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Ai Policy","description":"Validates AI policy clarity for training, search, answer use, caching, and attribution for cross-standard coverage alignment across the W3C WAI standards and guidelines catalog. Evidence should include well-known AI policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Ai Policy appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ai policy evidence for w3c wai standards matrix, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-master-25","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai","w3c","standards-matrix","ai-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-master check:25","humanCommand":"Map accessibility evidence against the full WAI standards and guidelines matrix; review the ai-policy evidence dimension for W3C WAI Standards Matrix"}},{"id":"ni-wai-master-26","testId":"ni-wai-master-26","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Trust Policy","description":"Validates trust policy coverage for privacy, traceability, metadata, and protected actions for cross-standard coverage alignment across the W3C WAI standards and guidelines catalog. Evidence should include trust.json evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Trust Policy appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the trust policy evidence for w3c wai standards matrix, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-master-26","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai","w3c","standards-matrix","trust-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-master check:26","humanCommand":"Map accessibility evidence against the full WAI standards and guidelines matrix; review the trust-policy evidence dimension for W3C WAI Standards Matrix"}},{"id":"ni-wai-master-27","testId":"ni-wai-master-27","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Openapi Contract","description":"Validates OpenAPI availability, server URL accuracy, schemas, and auth policy for cross-standard coverage alignment across the W3C WAI standards and guidelines catalog. Evidence should include OpenAPI text/JSON evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Openapi Contract appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the openapi contract evidence for w3c wai standards matrix, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-master-27","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai","w3c","standards-matrix","openapi-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-master check:27","humanCommand":"Map accessibility evidence against the full WAI standards and guidelines matrix; review the openapi-contract evidence dimension for W3C WAI Standards Matrix"}},{"id":"ni-wai-master-28","testId":"ni-wai-master-28","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Mcp Contract","description":"Validates MCP JSON-RPC introspection, real tools, resources, and protected boundaries for cross-standard coverage alignment across the W3C WAI standards and guidelines catalog. Evidence should include MCP manifest and initialize evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Mcp Contract appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the mcp contract evidence for w3c wai standards matrix, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-master-28","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai","w3c","standards-matrix","mcp-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-master check:28","humanCommand":"Map accessibility evidence against the full WAI standards and guidelines matrix; review the mcp-contract evidence dimension for W3C WAI Standards Matrix"}},{"id":"ni-wai-master-29","testId":"ni-wai-master-29","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Api Error Shape","description":"Validates API success/error response shape consistency for cross-standard coverage alignment across the W3C WAI standards and guidelines catalog. Evidence should include REST envelope evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Api Error Shape appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the api error shape evidence for w3c wai standards matrix, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-master-29","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai","w3c","standards-matrix","api-error-shape","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-master check:29","humanCommand":"Map accessibility evidence against the full WAI standards and guidelines matrix; review the api-error-shape evidence dimension for W3C WAI Standards Matrix"}},{"id":"ni-wai-master-30","testId":"ni-wai-master-30","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Traceability","description":"Validates trace propagation, request IDs, and safe observability correlation for cross-standard coverage alignment across the W3C WAI standards and guidelines catalog. Evidence should include trace header and metadata evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Traceability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the traceability evidence for w3c wai standards matrix, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-master-30","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai","w3c","standards-matrix","traceability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-master check:30","humanCommand":"Map accessibility evidence against the full WAI standards and guidelines matrix; review the traceability evidence dimension for W3C WAI Standards Matrix"}},{"id":"ni-wai-master-31","testId":"ni-wai-master-31","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Ja4 Redaction","description":"Validates fingerprint-adjacent metadata redaction and non-public raw JA4 handling for cross-standard coverage alignment across the W3C WAI standards and guidelines catalog. Evidence should include metadata policy and redaction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Ja4 Redaction appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the ja4 redaction evidence for w3c wai standards matrix, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-master-31","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai","w3c","standards-matrix","ja4-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-master check:31","humanCommand":"Map accessibility evidence against the full WAI standards and guidelines matrix; review the ja4-redaction evidence dimension for W3C WAI Standards Matrix"}},{"id":"ni-wai-master-32","testId":"ni-wai-master-32","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Secret Redaction","description":"Validates absence of secrets, generic key examples, cookies, and raw tokens in public outputs for cross-standard coverage alignment across the W3C WAI standards and guidelines catalog. Evidence should include public artifact scan evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Secret Redaction appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the secret redaction evidence for w3c wai standards matrix, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-master-32","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai","w3c","standards-matrix","secret-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-master check:32","humanCommand":"Map accessibility evidence against the full WAI standards and guidelines matrix; review the secret-redaction evidence dimension for W3C WAI Standards Matrix"}},{"id":"ni-wai-master-33","testId":"ni-wai-master-33","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Security Headers","description":"Validates security header coverage and hardened transport signals for cross-standard coverage alignment across the W3C WAI standards and guidelines catalog. Evidence should include HTTP header evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Security Headers appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the security headers evidence for w3c wai standards matrix, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-master-33","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai","w3c","standards-matrix","security-headers","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-master check:33","humanCommand":"Map accessibility evidence against the full WAI standards and guidelines matrix; review the security-headers evidence dimension for W3C WAI Standards Matrix"}},{"id":"ni-wai-master-34","testId":"ni-wai-master-34","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Privacy Consent","description":"Validates privacy policy, consent, attribution, and data-use disclosure quality for cross-standard coverage alignment across the W3C WAI standards and guidelines catalog. Evidence should include public page and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Privacy Consent appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the privacy consent evidence for w3c wai standards matrix, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-master-34","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai","w3c","standards-matrix","privacy-consent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-master check:34","humanCommand":"Map accessibility evidence against the full WAI standards and guidelines matrix; review the privacy-consent evidence dimension for W3C WAI Standards Matrix"}},{"id":"ni-wai-master-35","testId":"ni-wai-master-35","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Structured Data","description":"Validates JSON-LD and entity modeling for machine interpretation for cross-standard coverage alignment across the W3C WAI standards and guidelines catalog. Evidence should include schema block and parse evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Structured Data appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the structured data evidence for w3c wai standards matrix, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-master-35","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai","w3c","standards-matrix","structured-data","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-master check:35","humanCommand":"Map accessibility evidence against the full WAI standards and guidelines matrix; review the structured-data evidence dimension for W3C WAI Standards Matrix"}},{"id":"ni-wai-master-36","testId":"ni-wai-master-36","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Social Preview","description":"Validates Open Graph and Twitter/X card readiness for public sharing for cross-standard coverage alignment across the W3C WAI standards and guidelines catalog. Evidence should include meta tag evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Social Preview appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the social preview evidence for w3c wai standards matrix, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-master-36","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai","w3c","standards-matrix","social-preview","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-master check:36","humanCommand":"Map accessibility evidence against the full WAI standards and guidelines matrix; review the social-preview evidence dimension for W3C WAI Standards Matrix"}},{"id":"ni-wai-master-37","testId":"ni-wai-master-37","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: I18n Routing","description":"Validates locale route, hreflang, language declaration, and translation readiness for cross-standard coverage alignment across the W3C WAI standards and guidelines catalog. Evidence should include lang/hreflang and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: I18n Routing appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the i18n routing evidence for w3c wai standards matrix, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-master-37","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai","w3c","standards-matrix","i18n-routing","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-master check:37","humanCommand":"Map accessibility evidence against the full WAI standards and guidelines matrix; review the i18n-routing evidence dimension for W3C WAI Standards Matrix"}},{"id":"ni-wai-master-38","testId":"ni-wai-master-38","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Readability","description":"Validates human readability, sectioning, sentence complexity, and comprehension support for cross-standard coverage alignment across the W3C WAI standards and guidelines catalog. Evidence should include extracted content evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Readability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the readability evidence for w3c wai standards matrix, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-master-38","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai","w3c","standards-matrix","readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-master check:38","humanCommand":"Map accessibility evidence against the full WAI standards and guidelines matrix; review the readability evidence dimension for W3C WAI Standards Matrix"}},{"id":"ni-wai-master-39","testId":"ni-wai-master-39","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Content Utility","description":"Validates non-placeholder content usefulness and domain-specific public value for cross-standard coverage alignment across the W3C WAI standards and guidelines catalog. Evidence should include content extraction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Content Utility appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the content utility evidence for w3c wai standards matrix, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-master-39","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai","w3c","standards-matrix","content-utility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-master check:39","humanCommand":"Map accessibility evidence against the full WAI standards and guidelines matrix; review the content-utility evidence dimension for W3C WAI Standards Matrix"}},{"id":"ni-wai-master-40","testId":"ni-wai-master-40","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Recommendation Grounding","description":"Validates recommendation grounding in deterministic evidence instead of fabricated model output for cross-standard coverage alignment across the W3C WAI standards and guidelines catalog. Evidence should include issue and remediation evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Recommendation Grounding appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the recommendation grounding evidence for w3c wai standards matrix, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-master-40","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai","w3c","standards-matrix","recommendation-grounding","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-master check:40","humanCommand":"Map accessibility evidence against the full WAI standards and guidelines matrix; review the recommendation-grounding evidence dimension for W3C WAI Standards Matrix"}},{"id":"ni-wai-master-41","testId":"ni-wai-master-41","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Evidence Quality","description":"Validates evidence completeness, public safety, and reproducibility for cross-standard coverage alignment across the W3C WAI standards and guidelines catalog. Evidence should include test output and artifact evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Evidence Quality appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the evidence quality evidence for w3c wai standards matrix, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-master-41","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai","w3c","standards-matrix","evidence-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-master check:41","humanCommand":"Map accessibility evidence against the full WAI standards and guidelines matrix; review the evidence-quality evidence dimension for W3C WAI Standards Matrix"}},{"id":"ni-wai-master-42","testId":"ni-wai-master-42","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Threshold Policy","description":"Validates threshold clarity, pass/warn/fail semantics, and scoring transparency for cross-standard coverage alignment across the W3C WAI standards and guidelines catalog. Evidence should include threshold and result status evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Threshold Policy appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the threshold policy evidence for w3c wai standards matrix, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-master-42","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai","w3c","standards-matrix","threshold-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-master check:42","humanCommand":"Map accessibility evidence against the full WAI standards and guidelines matrix; review the threshold-policy evidence dimension for W3C WAI Standards Matrix"}},{"id":"ni-wai-master-43","testId":"ni-wai-master-43","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Confidence","description":"Validates confidence scoring and degraded-input disclosure for cross-standard coverage alignment across the W3C WAI standards and guidelines catalog. Evidence should include source freshness and input availability evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Confidence appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the confidence evidence for w3c wai standards matrix, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-master-43","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai","w3c","standards-matrix","confidence","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-master check:43","humanCommand":"Map accessibility evidence against the full WAI standards and guidelines matrix; review the confidence evidence dimension for W3C WAI Standards Matrix"}},{"id":"ni-wai-master-44","testId":"ni-wai-master-44","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Trend Readiness","description":"Validates historical comparability and timeline readiness for future reruns for cross-standard coverage alignment across the W3C WAI standards and guidelines catalog. Evidence should include analysis ID, timestamp, and persistence evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Trend Readiness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the trend readiness evidence for w3c wai standards matrix, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-master-44","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai","w3c","standards-matrix","trend-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-master check:44","humanCommand":"Map accessibility evidence against the full WAI standards and guidelines matrix; review the trend-readiness evidence dimension for W3C WAI Standards Matrix"}},{"id":"ni-wai-master-45","testId":"ni-wai-master-45","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Ranking Readiness","description":"Validates ranking input completeness and profile compatibility for cross-standard coverage alignment across the W3C WAI standards and guidelines catalog. Evidence should include score and profile evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Ranking Readiness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ranking readiness evidence for w3c wai standards matrix, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-master-45","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai","w3c","standards-matrix","ranking-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-master check:45","humanCommand":"Map accessibility evidence against the full WAI standards and guidelines matrix; review the ranking-readiness evidence dimension for W3C WAI Standards Matrix"}},{"id":"ni-wai-master-46","testId":"ni-wai-master-46","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Network Contribution","description":"Validates PlatPhorm network contribution through discovery, integrations, and standards compliance for cross-standard coverage alignment across the W3C WAI standards and guidelines catalog. Evidence should include network graph and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Network Contribution appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the network contribution evidence for w3c wai standards matrix, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-master-46","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai","w3c","standards-matrix","network-contribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-master check:46","humanCommand":"Map accessibility evidence against the full WAI standards and guidelines matrix; review the network-contribution evidence dimension for W3C WAI Standards Matrix"}},{"id":"ni-wai-master-47","testId":"ni-wai-master-47","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Report Readiness","description":"Validates report/export categorization with public-safe evidence and protected boundaries for cross-standard coverage alignment across the W3C WAI standards and guidelines catalog. Evidence should include report section mapping evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Report Readiness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the report readiness evidence for w3c wai standards matrix, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-master-47","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai","w3c","standards-matrix","report-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-master check:47","humanCommand":"Map accessibility evidence against the full WAI standards and guidelines matrix; review the report-readiness evidence dimension for W3C WAI Standards Matrix"}},{"id":"ni-wai-master-48","testId":"ni-wai-master-48","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Operator Actionability","description":"Validates clear remediation, owner action, difficulty, and retest path for cross-standard coverage alignment across the W3C WAI standards and guidelines catalog. Evidence should include fix instructions and command evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Operator Actionability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the operator actionability evidence for w3c wai standards matrix, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-master-48","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai","w3c","standards-matrix","operator-actionability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-master check:48","humanCommand":"Map accessibility evidence against the full WAI standards and guidelines matrix; review the operator-actionability evidence dimension for W3C WAI Standards Matrix"}},{"id":"ni-wai-master-49","testId":"ni-wai-master-49","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Degraded State","description":"Validates honest degraded, unavailable, skipped, and not-applicable states for cross-standard coverage alignment across the W3C WAI standards and guidelines catalog. Evidence should include status and storage evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Degraded State appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the degraded state evidence for w3c wai standards matrix, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-master-49","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai","w3c","standards-matrix","degraded-state","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-master check:49","humanCommand":"Map accessibility evidence against the full WAI standards and guidelines matrix; review the degraded-state evidence dimension for W3C WAI Standards Matrix"}},{"id":"ni-wai-master-50","testId":"ni-wai-master-50","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Reproducibility","description":"Validates stable CLI/API/human reproduction path and deterministic rerun instructions for cross-standard coverage alignment across the W3C WAI standards and guidelines catalog. Evidence should include commands and registry version evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"W3C WAI Standards Matrix: Reproducibility appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the reproducibility evidence for w3c wai standards matrix, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-master-50","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai","w3c","standards-matrix","reproducibility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-master check:50","humanCommand":"Map accessibility evidence against the full WAI standards and guidelines matrix; review the reproducibility evidence dimension for W3C WAI Standards Matrix"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-01","testId":"ni-wai-aria-01","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Availability","description":"Validates public route availability and successful bounded fetch behavior for aria roles, states, properties, and interaction pattern integrity. Evidence should include HTTP status, timeout, and redirect evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Availability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the availability evidence for wai-aria conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-01","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai-aria","aria","w3c","availability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria check:1","humanCommand":"Validate ARIA usage against WAI-ARIA requirements and patterns; review the availability evidence dimension for WAI-ARIA Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-02","testId":"ni-wai-aria-02","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Public Safety","description":"Validates public-safe access boundaries without exposing private or protected data for aria roles, states, properties, and interaction pattern integrity. Evidence should include route policy and response-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Public Safety appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the public safety evidence for wai-aria conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-02","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai-aria","aria","w3c","public-safety","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria check:2","humanCommand":"Validate ARIA usage against WAI-ARIA requirements and patterns; review the public-safety evidence dimension for WAI-ARIA Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-03","testId":"ni-wai-aria-03","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Canonical Url","description":"Validates canonical URL stability and normalized route identity for aria roles, states, properties, and interaction pattern integrity. Evidence should include canonical tags, redirects, and normalized URL evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Canonical Url appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the canonical url evidence for wai-aria conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-03","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai-aria","aria","w3c","canonical-url","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria check:3","humanCommand":"Validate ARIA usage against WAI-ARIA requirements and patterns; review the canonical-url evidence dimension for WAI-ARIA Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-04","testId":"ni-wai-aria-04","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Metadata Clarity","description":"Validates title, description, and page-specific metadata clarity for aria roles, states, properties, and interaction pattern integrity. Evidence should include HTML metadata and extracted text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Metadata Clarity appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the metadata clarity evidence for wai-aria conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-04","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai-aria","aria","w3c","metadata-clarity","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria check:4","humanCommand":"Validate ARIA usage against WAI-ARIA requirements and patterns; review the metadata-clarity evidence dimension for WAI-ARIA Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-05","testId":"ni-wai-aria-05","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Semantic Structure","description":"Validates semantic HTML structure for humans, agents, and assistive technology for aria roles, states, properties, and interaction pattern integrity. Evidence should include heading, landmark, and element evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Semantic Structure appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the semantic structure evidence for wai-aria conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-05","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai-aria","aria","w3c","semantic-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria check:5","humanCommand":"Validate ARIA usage against WAI-ARIA requirements and patterns; review the semantic-structure evidence dimension for WAI-ARIA Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-06","testId":"ni-wai-aria-06","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Machine Readability","description":"Validates machine-readable public content and predictable parsing surfaces for aria roles, states, properties, and interaction pattern integrity. Evidence should include structured tags, JSON-LD, and document-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Machine Readability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the machine readability evidence for wai-aria conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-06","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai-aria","aria","w3c","machine-readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria check:6","humanCommand":"Validate ARIA usage against WAI-ARIA requirements and patterns; review the machine-readability evidence dimension for WAI-ARIA Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-07","testId":"ni-wai-aria-07","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Agent Discovery","description":"Validates agent discovery hints and AI-readable policy/documentation signals for aria roles, states, properties, and interaction pattern integrity. Evidence should include llms, policy, MCP, OpenAPI, or schema evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Agent Discovery appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the agent discovery evidence for wai-aria conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-07","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai-aria","aria","w3c","agent-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria check:7","humanCommand":"Validate ARIA usage against WAI-ARIA requirements and patterns; review the agent-discovery evidence dimension for WAI-ARIA Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-08","testId":"ni-wai-aria-08","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Crawler Discovery","description":"Validates crawler discovery paths through robots, sitemap, feeds, and canonical links for aria roles, states, properties, and interaction pattern integrity. Evidence should include discovery artifact and link evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Crawler Discovery appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the crawler discovery evidence for wai-aria conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-08","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai-aria","aria","w3c","crawler-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria check:8","humanCommand":"Validate ARIA usage against WAI-ARIA requirements and patterns; review the crawler-discovery evidence dimension for WAI-ARIA Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-09","testId":"ni-wai-aria-09","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Answerability","description":"Validates direct answer extraction and quotable explanatory content for aria roles, states, properties, and interaction pattern integrity. Evidence should include question, summary, heading, and paragraph evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Answerability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the answerability evidence for wai-aria conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-09","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai-aria","aria","w3c","answerability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria check:9","humanCommand":"Validate ARIA usage against WAI-ARIA requirements and patterns; review the answerability evidence dimension for WAI-ARIA Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-10","testId":"ni-wai-aria-10","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Generative Context","description":"Validates GEO context quality for generative engines without inventing measured facts for aria roles, states, properties, and interaction pattern integrity. Evidence should include entity, source, and instruction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Generative Context appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the generative context evidence for wai-aria conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-10","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai-aria","aria","w3c","generative-context","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria check:10","humanCommand":"Validate ARIA usage against WAI-ARIA requirements and patterns; review the generative-context evidence dimension for WAI-ARIA Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-11","testId":"ni-wai-aria-11","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Search Intent","description":"Validates search intent alignment and snippet-friendly content structure for aria roles, states, properties, and interaction pattern integrity. Evidence should include metadata, headings, and topical text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Search Intent appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the search intent evidence for wai-aria conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-11","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai-aria","aria","w3c","search-intent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria check:11","humanCommand":"Validate ARIA usage against WAI-ARIA requirements and patterns; review the search-intent evidence dimension for WAI-ARIA Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-12","testId":"ni-wai-aria-12","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Accessibility Semantics","description":"Validates accessible names, relationships, landmarks, and keyboard-relevant structure for aria roles, states, properties, and interaction pattern integrity. Evidence should include ARIA, labels, landmarks, and control evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Accessibility Semantics appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the accessibility semantics evidence for wai-aria conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-12","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai-aria","aria","w3c","accessibility-semantics","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria check:12","humanCommand":"Validate ARIA usage against WAI-ARIA requirements and patterns; review the accessibility-semantics evidence dimension for WAI-ARIA Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-13","testId":"ni-wai-aria-13","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Mobile Readiness","description":"Validates mobile viewport, responsive content, and touch-friendly layout signals for aria roles, states, properties, and interaction pattern integrity. Evidence should include viewport and responsive asset evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Mobile Readiness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the mobile readiness evidence for wai-aria conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-13","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai-aria","aria","w3c","mobile-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria check:13","humanCommand":"Validate ARIA usage against WAI-ARIA requirements and patterns; review the mobile-readiness evidence dimension for WAI-ARIA Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-14","testId":"ni-wai-aria-14","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Performance Budget","description":"Validates performance budget compliance using measured or bounded deterministic inputs for aria roles, states, properties, and interaction pattern integrity. Evidence should include timing, byte, and Lighthouse-derived evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Performance Budget appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the performance budget evidence for wai-aria conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-14","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai-aria","aria","w3c","performance-budget","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria check:14","humanCommand":"Validate ARIA usage against WAI-ARIA requirements and patterns; review the performance-budget evidence dimension for WAI-ARIA Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-15","testId":"ni-wai-aria-15","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Resource Efficiency","description":"Validates resource size, script/style count, and optimization opportunity signals for aria roles, states, properties, and interaction pattern integrity. Evidence should include resource and markup evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Resource Efficiency appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the resource efficiency evidence for wai-aria conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-15","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai-aria","aria","w3c","resource-efficiency","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria check:15","humanCommand":"Validate ARIA usage against WAI-ARIA requirements and patterns; review the resource-efficiency evidence dimension for WAI-ARIA Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-16","testId":"ni-wai-aria-16","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Cache Freshness","description":"Validates cache behavior, freshness hints, and stale-content risk for aria roles, states, properties, and interaction pattern integrity. Evidence should include HTTP cache and timestamp evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Cache Freshness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the cache freshness evidence for wai-aria conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-16","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai-aria","aria","w3c","cache-freshness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria check:16","humanCommand":"Validate ARIA usage against WAI-ARIA requirements and patterns; review the cache-freshness evidence dimension for WAI-ARIA Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-17","testId":"ni-wai-aria-17","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Route Reliability","description":"Validates route reliability, redirect safety, and dead-link risk for aria roles, states, properties, and interaction pattern integrity. Evidence should include status, redirect, and sitemap evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Route Reliability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the route reliability evidence for wai-aria conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-17","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai-aria","aria","w3c","route-reliability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria check:17","humanCommand":"Validate ARIA usage against WAI-ARIA requirements and patterns; review the route-reliability evidence dimension for WAI-ARIA Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-18","testId":"ni-wai-aria-18","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Feed Quality","description":"Validates RSS/Atom/feed usefulness, parseability, and freshness for aria roles, states, properties, and interaction pattern integrity. Evidence should include feed XML and item evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Feed Quality appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the feed quality evidence for wai-aria conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-18","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai-aria","aria","w3c","feed-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria check:18","humanCommand":"Validate ARIA usage against WAI-ARIA requirements and patterns; review the feed-quality evidence dimension for WAI-ARIA Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-19","testId":"ni-wai-aria-19","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Sitemap Quality","description":"Validates sitemap validity, public-safe URL coverage, and no-dead-link policy for aria roles, states, properties, and interaction pattern integrity. Evidence should include sitemap XML and bounded link-check evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Sitemap Quality appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the sitemap quality evidence for wai-aria conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-19","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai-aria","aria","w3c","sitemap-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria check:19","humanCommand":"Validate ARIA usage against WAI-ARIA requirements and patterns; review the sitemap-quality evidence dimension for WAI-ARIA Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-20","testId":"ni-wai-aria-20","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Robots Alignment","description":"Validates robots.txt alignment with public/protected policy and sitemap discovery for aria roles, states, properties, and interaction pattern integrity. Evidence should include robots directives and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Robots Alignment appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the robots alignment evidence for wai-aria conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-20","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai-aria","aria","w3c","robots-alignment","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria check:20","humanCommand":"Validate ARIA usage against WAI-ARIA requirements and patterns; review the robots-alignment evidence dimension for WAI-ARIA Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-21","testId":"ni-wai-aria-21","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Llms Structure","description":"Validates llms.txt structure, readability, endpoint coverage, and agent usefulness for aria roles, states, properties, and interaction pattern integrity. Evidence should include plain-text section and line-length evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Llms Structure appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms structure evidence for wai-aria conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-21","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai-aria","aria","w3c","llms-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria check:21","humanCommand":"Validate ARIA usage against WAI-ARIA requirements and patterns; review the llms-structure evidence dimension for WAI-ARIA Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-22","testId":"ni-wai-aria-22","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Llms Index Schema","description":"Validates llms-index JSON schema shape and count reconciliation for aria roles, states, properties, and interaction pattern integrity. Evidence should include JSON keys, counts, and endpoint evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Llms Index Schema appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms index schema evidence for wai-aria conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-22","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai-aria","aria","w3c","llms-index-schema","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria check:22","humanCommand":"Validate ARIA usage against WAI-ARIA requirements and patterns; review the llms-index-schema evidence dimension for WAI-ARIA Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-23","testId":"ni-wai-aria-23","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Humans Attribution","description":"Validates humans.txt attribution, maintainer, technology, and governance transparency for aria roles, states, properties, and interaction pattern integrity. Evidence should include humans.txt section evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Humans Attribution appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the humans attribution evidence for wai-aria conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-23","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai-aria","aria","w3c","humans-attribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria check:23","humanCommand":"Validate ARIA usage against WAI-ARIA requirements and patterns; review the humans-attribution evidence dimension for WAI-ARIA Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-24","testId":"ni-wai-aria-24","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Agent Policy","description":"Validates agent-policy JSON clarity for allowed, disallowed, and protected operations for aria roles, states, properties, and interaction pattern integrity. Evidence should include well-known policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Agent Policy appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the agent policy evidence for wai-aria conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-24","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai-aria","aria","w3c","agent-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria check:24","humanCommand":"Validate ARIA usage against WAI-ARIA requirements and patterns; review the agent-policy evidence dimension for WAI-ARIA Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-25","testId":"ni-wai-aria-25","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Ai Policy","description":"Validates AI policy clarity for training, search, answer use, caching, and attribution for aria roles, states, properties, and interaction pattern integrity. Evidence should include well-known AI policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Ai Policy appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ai policy evidence for wai-aria conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-25","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai-aria","aria","w3c","ai-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria check:25","humanCommand":"Validate ARIA usage against WAI-ARIA requirements and patterns; review the ai-policy evidence dimension for WAI-ARIA Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-26","testId":"ni-wai-aria-26","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Trust Policy","description":"Validates trust policy coverage for privacy, traceability, metadata, and protected actions for aria roles, states, properties, and interaction pattern integrity. Evidence should include trust.json evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Trust Policy appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the trust policy evidence for wai-aria conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-26","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai-aria","aria","w3c","trust-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria check:26","humanCommand":"Validate ARIA usage against WAI-ARIA requirements and patterns; review the trust-policy evidence dimension for WAI-ARIA Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-27","testId":"ni-wai-aria-27","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Openapi Contract","description":"Validates OpenAPI availability, server URL accuracy, schemas, and auth policy for aria roles, states, properties, and interaction pattern integrity. Evidence should include OpenAPI text/JSON evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Openapi Contract appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the openapi contract evidence for wai-aria conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-27","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai-aria","aria","w3c","openapi-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria check:27","humanCommand":"Validate ARIA usage against WAI-ARIA requirements and patterns; review the openapi-contract evidence dimension for WAI-ARIA Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-28","testId":"ni-wai-aria-28","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Mcp Contract","description":"Validates MCP JSON-RPC introspection, real tools, resources, and protected boundaries for aria roles, states, properties, and interaction pattern integrity. Evidence should include MCP manifest and initialize evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Mcp Contract appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the mcp contract evidence for wai-aria conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-28","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai-aria","aria","w3c","mcp-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria check:28","humanCommand":"Validate ARIA usage against WAI-ARIA requirements and patterns; review the mcp-contract evidence dimension for WAI-ARIA Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-29","testId":"ni-wai-aria-29","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Api Error Shape","description":"Validates API success/error response shape consistency for aria roles, states, properties, and interaction pattern integrity. Evidence should include REST envelope evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Api Error Shape appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the api error shape evidence for wai-aria conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-29","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai-aria","aria","w3c","api-error-shape","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria check:29","humanCommand":"Validate ARIA usage against WAI-ARIA requirements and patterns; review the api-error-shape evidence dimension for WAI-ARIA Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-30","testId":"ni-wai-aria-30","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Traceability","description":"Validates trace propagation, request IDs, and safe observability correlation for aria roles, states, properties, and interaction pattern integrity. Evidence should include trace header and metadata evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Traceability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the traceability evidence for wai-aria conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-30","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai-aria","aria","w3c","traceability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria check:30","humanCommand":"Validate ARIA usage against WAI-ARIA requirements and patterns; review the traceability evidence dimension for WAI-ARIA Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-31","testId":"ni-wai-aria-31","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Ja4 Redaction","description":"Validates fingerprint-adjacent metadata redaction and non-public raw JA4 handling for aria roles, states, properties, and interaction pattern integrity. Evidence should include metadata policy and redaction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Ja4 Redaction appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the ja4 redaction evidence for wai-aria conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-31","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai-aria","aria","w3c","ja4-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria check:31","humanCommand":"Validate ARIA usage against WAI-ARIA requirements and patterns; review the ja4-redaction evidence dimension for WAI-ARIA Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-32","testId":"ni-wai-aria-32","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Secret Redaction","description":"Validates absence of secrets, generic key examples, cookies, and raw tokens in public outputs for aria roles, states, properties, and interaction pattern integrity. Evidence should include public artifact scan evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Secret Redaction appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the secret redaction evidence for wai-aria conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-32","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai-aria","aria","w3c","secret-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria check:32","humanCommand":"Validate ARIA usage against WAI-ARIA requirements and patterns; review the secret-redaction evidence dimension for WAI-ARIA Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-33","testId":"ni-wai-aria-33","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Security Headers","description":"Validates security header coverage and hardened transport signals for aria roles, states, properties, and interaction pattern integrity. Evidence should include HTTP header evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Security Headers appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the security headers evidence for wai-aria conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-33","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai-aria","aria","w3c","security-headers","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria check:33","humanCommand":"Validate ARIA usage against WAI-ARIA requirements and patterns; review the security-headers evidence dimension for WAI-ARIA Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-34","testId":"ni-wai-aria-34","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Privacy Consent","description":"Validates privacy policy, consent, attribution, and data-use disclosure quality for aria roles, states, properties, and interaction pattern integrity. Evidence should include public page and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Privacy Consent appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the privacy consent evidence for wai-aria conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-34","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai-aria","aria","w3c","privacy-consent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria check:34","humanCommand":"Validate ARIA usage against WAI-ARIA requirements and patterns; review the privacy-consent evidence dimension for WAI-ARIA Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-35","testId":"ni-wai-aria-35","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Structured Data","description":"Validates JSON-LD and entity modeling for machine interpretation for aria roles, states, properties, and interaction pattern integrity. Evidence should include schema block and parse evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Structured Data appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the structured data evidence for wai-aria conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-35","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai-aria","aria","w3c","structured-data","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria check:35","humanCommand":"Validate ARIA usage against WAI-ARIA requirements and patterns; review the structured-data evidence dimension for WAI-ARIA Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-36","testId":"ni-wai-aria-36","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Social Preview","description":"Validates Open Graph and Twitter/X card readiness for public sharing for aria roles, states, properties, and interaction pattern integrity. Evidence should include meta tag evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Social Preview appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the social preview evidence for wai-aria conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-36","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai-aria","aria","w3c","social-preview","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria check:36","humanCommand":"Validate ARIA usage against WAI-ARIA requirements and patterns; review the social-preview evidence dimension for WAI-ARIA Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-37","testId":"ni-wai-aria-37","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: I18n Routing","description":"Validates locale route, hreflang, language declaration, and translation readiness for aria roles, states, properties, and interaction pattern integrity. Evidence should include lang/hreflang and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: I18n Routing appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the i18n routing evidence for wai-aria conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-37","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai-aria","aria","w3c","i18n-routing","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria check:37","humanCommand":"Validate ARIA usage against WAI-ARIA requirements and patterns; review the i18n-routing evidence dimension for WAI-ARIA Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-38","testId":"ni-wai-aria-38","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Readability","description":"Validates human readability, sectioning, sentence complexity, and comprehension support for aria roles, states, properties, and interaction pattern integrity. Evidence should include extracted content evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Readability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the readability evidence for wai-aria conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-38","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai-aria","aria","w3c","readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria check:38","humanCommand":"Validate ARIA usage against WAI-ARIA requirements and patterns; review the readability evidence dimension for WAI-ARIA Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-39","testId":"ni-wai-aria-39","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Content Utility","description":"Validates non-placeholder content usefulness and domain-specific public value for aria roles, states, properties, and interaction pattern integrity. Evidence should include content extraction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Content Utility appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the content utility evidence for wai-aria conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-39","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai-aria","aria","w3c","content-utility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria check:39","humanCommand":"Validate ARIA usage against WAI-ARIA requirements and patterns; review the content-utility evidence dimension for WAI-ARIA Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-40","testId":"ni-wai-aria-40","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Recommendation Grounding","description":"Validates recommendation grounding in deterministic evidence instead of fabricated model output for aria roles, states, properties, and interaction pattern integrity. Evidence should include issue and remediation evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Recommendation Grounding appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the recommendation grounding evidence for wai-aria conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-40","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai-aria","aria","w3c","recommendation-grounding","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria check:40","humanCommand":"Validate ARIA usage against WAI-ARIA requirements and patterns; review the recommendation-grounding evidence dimension for WAI-ARIA Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-41","testId":"ni-wai-aria-41","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Evidence Quality","description":"Validates evidence completeness, public safety, and reproducibility for aria roles, states, properties, and interaction pattern integrity. Evidence should include test output and artifact evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Evidence Quality appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the evidence quality evidence for wai-aria conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-41","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai-aria","aria","w3c","evidence-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria check:41","humanCommand":"Validate ARIA usage against WAI-ARIA requirements and patterns; review the evidence-quality evidence dimension for WAI-ARIA Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-42","testId":"ni-wai-aria-42","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Threshold Policy","description":"Validates threshold clarity, pass/warn/fail semantics, and scoring transparency for aria roles, states, properties, and interaction pattern integrity. Evidence should include threshold and result status evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Threshold Policy appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the threshold policy evidence for wai-aria conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-42","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai-aria","aria","w3c","threshold-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria check:42","humanCommand":"Validate ARIA usage against WAI-ARIA requirements and patterns; review the threshold-policy evidence dimension for WAI-ARIA Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-43","testId":"ni-wai-aria-43","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Confidence","description":"Validates confidence scoring and degraded-input disclosure for aria roles, states, properties, and interaction pattern integrity. Evidence should include source freshness and input availability evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Confidence appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the confidence evidence for wai-aria conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-43","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai-aria","aria","w3c","confidence","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria check:43","humanCommand":"Validate ARIA usage against WAI-ARIA requirements and patterns; review the confidence evidence dimension for WAI-ARIA Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-44","testId":"ni-wai-aria-44","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Trend Readiness","description":"Validates historical comparability and timeline readiness for future reruns for aria roles, states, properties, and interaction pattern integrity. Evidence should include analysis ID, timestamp, and persistence evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Trend Readiness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the trend readiness evidence for wai-aria conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-44","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai-aria","aria","w3c","trend-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria check:44","humanCommand":"Validate ARIA usage against WAI-ARIA requirements and patterns; review the trend-readiness evidence dimension for WAI-ARIA Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-45","testId":"ni-wai-aria-45","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Ranking Readiness","description":"Validates ranking input completeness and profile compatibility for aria roles, states, properties, and interaction pattern integrity. Evidence should include score and profile evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Ranking Readiness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ranking readiness evidence for wai-aria conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-45","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai-aria","aria","w3c","ranking-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria check:45","humanCommand":"Validate ARIA usage against WAI-ARIA requirements and patterns; review the ranking-readiness evidence dimension for WAI-ARIA Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-46","testId":"ni-wai-aria-46","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Network Contribution","description":"Validates PlatPhorm network contribution through discovery, integrations, and standards compliance for aria roles, states, properties, and interaction pattern integrity. Evidence should include network graph and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Network Contribution appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the network contribution evidence for wai-aria conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-46","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai-aria","aria","w3c","network-contribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria check:46","humanCommand":"Validate ARIA usage against WAI-ARIA requirements and patterns; review the network-contribution evidence dimension for WAI-ARIA Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-47","testId":"ni-wai-aria-47","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Report Readiness","description":"Validates report/export categorization with public-safe evidence and protected boundaries for aria roles, states, properties, and interaction pattern integrity. Evidence should include report section mapping evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Report Readiness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the report readiness evidence for wai-aria conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-47","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai-aria","aria","w3c","report-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria check:47","humanCommand":"Validate ARIA usage against WAI-ARIA requirements and patterns; review the report-readiness evidence dimension for WAI-ARIA Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-48","testId":"ni-wai-aria-48","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Operator Actionability","description":"Validates clear remediation, owner action, difficulty, and retest path for aria roles, states, properties, and interaction pattern integrity. Evidence should include fix instructions and command evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Operator Actionability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the operator actionability evidence for wai-aria conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-48","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai-aria","aria","w3c","operator-actionability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria check:48","humanCommand":"Validate ARIA usage against WAI-ARIA requirements and patterns; review the operator-actionability evidence dimension for WAI-ARIA Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-49","testId":"ni-wai-aria-49","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Degraded State","description":"Validates honest degraded, unavailable, skipped, and not-applicable states for aria roles, states, properties, and interaction pattern integrity. Evidence should include status and storage evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Degraded State appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the degraded state evidence for wai-aria conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-49","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai-aria","aria","w3c","degraded-state","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria check:49","humanCommand":"Validate ARIA usage against WAI-ARIA requirements and patterns; review the degraded-state evidence dimension for WAI-ARIA Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-50","testId":"ni-wai-aria-50","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Reproducibility","description":"Validates stable CLI/API/human reproduction path and deterministic rerun instructions for aria roles, states, properties, and interaction pattern integrity. Evidence should include commands and registry version evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WAI-ARIA Conformance: Reproducibility appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the reproducibility evidence for wai-aria conformance, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-50","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wai-aria","aria","w3c","reproducibility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria check:50","humanCommand":"Validate ARIA usage against WAI-ARIA requirements and patterns; review the reproducibility evidence dimension for WAI-ARIA Conformance"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-html-01","testId":"ni-wai-aria-html-01","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Availability","description":"Validates public route availability and successful bounded fetch behavior for allowed aria usage in HTML semantics and role conflicts prevention. Evidence should include HTTP status, timeout, and redirect evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Availability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the availability evidence for aria in html alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-html-01","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","aria-in-html","semantics","w3c","availability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria-html check:1","humanCommand":"Check aria-in-html mappings and invalid role overrides; review the availability evidence dimension for ARIA in HTML Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-html-02","testId":"ni-wai-aria-html-02","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Public Safety","description":"Validates public-safe access boundaries without exposing private or protected data for allowed aria usage in HTML semantics and role conflicts prevention. Evidence should include route policy and response-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Public Safety appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the public safety evidence for aria in html alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-html-02","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","aria-in-html","semantics","w3c","public-safety","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria-html check:2","humanCommand":"Check aria-in-html mappings and invalid role overrides; review the public-safety evidence dimension for ARIA in HTML Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-html-03","testId":"ni-wai-aria-html-03","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Canonical Url","description":"Validates canonical URL stability and normalized route identity for allowed aria usage in HTML semantics and role conflicts prevention. Evidence should include canonical tags, redirects, and normalized URL evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Canonical Url appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the canonical url evidence for aria in html alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-html-03","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","aria-in-html","semantics","w3c","canonical-url","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria-html check:3","humanCommand":"Check aria-in-html mappings and invalid role overrides; review the canonical-url evidence dimension for ARIA in HTML Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-html-04","testId":"ni-wai-aria-html-04","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Metadata Clarity","description":"Validates title, description, and page-specific metadata clarity for allowed aria usage in HTML semantics and role conflicts prevention. Evidence should include HTML metadata and extracted text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Metadata Clarity appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the metadata clarity evidence for aria in html alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-html-04","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","aria-in-html","semantics","w3c","metadata-clarity","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria-html check:4","humanCommand":"Check aria-in-html mappings and invalid role overrides; review the metadata-clarity evidence dimension for ARIA in HTML Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-html-05","testId":"ni-wai-aria-html-05","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Semantic Structure","description":"Validates semantic HTML structure for humans, agents, and assistive technology for allowed aria usage in HTML semantics and role conflicts prevention. Evidence should include heading, landmark, and element evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Semantic Structure appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the semantic structure evidence for aria in html alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-html-05","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","aria-in-html","semantics","w3c","semantic-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria-html check:5","humanCommand":"Check aria-in-html mappings and invalid role overrides; review the semantic-structure evidence dimension for ARIA in HTML Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-html-06","testId":"ni-wai-aria-html-06","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Machine Readability","description":"Validates machine-readable public content and predictable parsing surfaces for allowed aria usage in HTML semantics and role conflicts prevention. Evidence should include structured tags, JSON-LD, and document-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Machine Readability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the machine readability evidence for aria in html alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-html-06","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","aria-in-html","semantics","w3c","machine-readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria-html check:6","humanCommand":"Check aria-in-html mappings and invalid role overrides; review the machine-readability evidence dimension for ARIA in HTML Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-html-07","testId":"ni-wai-aria-html-07","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Agent Discovery","description":"Validates agent discovery hints and AI-readable policy/documentation signals for allowed aria usage in HTML semantics and role conflicts prevention. Evidence should include llms, policy, MCP, OpenAPI, or schema evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Agent Discovery appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the agent discovery evidence for aria in html alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-html-07","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","aria-in-html","semantics","w3c","agent-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria-html check:7","humanCommand":"Check aria-in-html mappings and invalid role overrides; review the agent-discovery evidence dimension for ARIA in HTML Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-html-08","testId":"ni-wai-aria-html-08","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Crawler Discovery","description":"Validates crawler discovery paths through robots, sitemap, feeds, and canonical links for allowed aria usage in HTML semantics and role conflicts prevention. Evidence should include discovery artifact and link evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Crawler Discovery appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the crawler discovery evidence for aria in html alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-html-08","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","aria-in-html","semantics","w3c","crawler-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria-html check:8","humanCommand":"Check aria-in-html mappings and invalid role overrides; review the crawler-discovery evidence dimension for ARIA in HTML Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-html-09","testId":"ni-wai-aria-html-09","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Answerability","description":"Validates direct answer extraction and quotable explanatory content for allowed aria usage in HTML semantics and role conflicts prevention. Evidence should include question, summary, heading, and paragraph evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Answerability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the answerability evidence for aria in html alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-html-09","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","aria-in-html","semantics","w3c","answerability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria-html check:9","humanCommand":"Check aria-in-html mappings and invalid role overrides; review the answerability evidence dimension for ARIA in HTML Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-html-10","testId":"ni-wai-aria-html-10","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Generative Context","description":"Validates GEO context quality for generative engines without inventing measured facts for allowed aria usage in HTML semantics and role conflicts prevention. Evidence should include entity, source, and instruction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Generative Context appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the generative context evidence for aria in html alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-html-10","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","aria-in-html","semantics","w3c","generative-context","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria-html check:10","humanCommand":"Check aria-in-html mappings and invalid role overrides; review the generative-context evidence dimension for ARIA in HTML Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-html-11","testId":"ni-wai-aria-html-11","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Search Intent","description":"Validates search intent alignment and snippet-friendly content structure for allowed aria usage in HTML semantics and role conflicts prevention. Evidence should include metadata, headings, and topical text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Search Intent appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the search intent evidence for aria in html alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-html-11","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","aria-in-html","semantics","w3c","search-intent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria-html check:11","humanCommand":"Check aria-in-html mappings and invalid role overrides; review the search-intent evidence dimension for ARIA in HTML Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-html-12","testId":"ni-wai-aria-html-12","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Accessibility Semantics","description":"Validates accessible names, relationships, landmarks, and keyboard-relevant structure for allowed aria usage in HTML semantics and role conflicts prevention. Evidence should include ARIA, labels, landmarks, and control evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Accessibility Semantics appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the accessibility semantics evidence for aria in html alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-html-12","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","aria-in-html","semantics","w3c","accessibility-semantics","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria-html check:12","humanCommand":"Check aria-in-html mappings and invalid role overrides; review the accessibility-semantics evidence dimension for ARIA in HTML Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-html-13","testId":"ni-wai-aria-html-13","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Mobile Readiness","description":"Validates mobile viewport, responsive content, and touch-friendly layout signals for allowed aria usage in HTML semantics and role conflicts prevention. Evidence should include viewport and responsive asset evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Mobile Readiness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the mobile readiness evidence for aria in html alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-html-13","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","aria-in-html","semantics","w3c","mobile-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria-html check:13","humanCommand":"Check aria-in-html mappings and invalid role overrides; review the mobile-readiness evidence dimension for ARIA in HTML Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-html-14","testId":"ni-wai-aria-html-14","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Performance Budget","description":"Validates performance budget compliance using measured or bounded deterministic inputs for allowed aria usage in HTML semantics and role conflicts prevention. Evidence should include timing, byte, and Lighthouse-derived evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Performance Budget appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the performance budget evidence for aria in html alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-html-14","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","aria-in-html","semantics","w3c","performance-budget","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria-html check:14","humanCommand":"Check aria-in-html mappings and invalid role overrides; review the performance-budget evidence dimension for ARIA in HTML Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-html-15","testId":"ni-wai-aria-html-15","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Resource Efficiency","description":"Validates resource size, script/style count, and optimization opportunity signals for allowed aria usage in HTML semantics and role conflicts prevention. Evidence should include resource and markup evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Resource Efficiency appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the resource efficiency evidence for aria in html alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-html-15","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","aria-in-html","semantics","w3c","resource-efficiency","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria-html check:15","humanCommand":"Check aria-in-html mappings and invalid role overrides; review the resource-efficiency evidence dimension for ARIA in HTML Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-html-16","testId":"ni-wai-aria-html-16","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Cache Freshness","description":"Validates cache behavior, freshness hints, and stale-content risk for allowed aria usage in HTML semantics and role conflicts prevention. Evidence should include HTTP cache and timestamp evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Cache Freshness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the cache freshness evidence for aria in html alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-html-16","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","aria-in-html","semantics","w3c","cache-freshness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria-html check:16","humanCommand":"Check aria-in-html mappings and invalid role overrides; review the cache-freshness evidence dimension for ARIA in HTML Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-html-17","testId":"ni-wai-aria-html-17","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Route Reliability","description":"Validates route reliability, redirect safety, and dead-link risk for allowed aria usage in HTML semantics and role conflicts prevention. Evidence should include status, redirect, and sitemap evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Route Reliability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the route reliability evidence for aria in html alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-html-17","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","aria-in-html","semantics","w3c","route-reliability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria-html check:17","humanCommand":"Check aria-in-html mappings and invalid role overrides; review the route-reliability evidence dimension for ARIA in HTML Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-html-18","testId":"ni-wai-aria-html-18","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Feed Quality","description":"Validates RSS/Atom/feed usefulness, parseability, and freshness for allowed aria usage in HTML semantics and role conflicts prevention. Evidence should include feed XML and item evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Feed Quality appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the feed quality evidence for aria in html alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-html-18","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","aria-in-html","semantics","w3c","feed-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria-html check:18","humanCommand":"Check aria-in-html mappings and invalid role overrides; review the feed-quality evidence dimension for ARIA in HTML Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-html-19","testId":"ni-wai-aria-html-19","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Sitemap Quality","description":"Validates sitemap validity, public-safe URL coverage, and no-dead-link policy for allowed aria usage in HTML semantics and role conflicts prevention. Evidence should include sitemap XML and bounded link-check evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Sitemap Quality appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the sitemap quality evidence for aria in html alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-html-19","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","aria-in-html","semantics","w3c","sitemap-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria-html check:19","humanCommand":"Check aria-in-html mappings and invalid role overrides; review the sitemap-quality evidence dimension for ARIA in HTML Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-html-20","testId":"ni-wai-aria-html-20","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Robots Alignment","description":"Validates robots.txt alignment with public/protected policy and sitemap discovery for allowed aria usage in HTML semantics and role conflicts prevention. Evidence should include robots directives and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Robots Alignment appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the robots alignment evidence for aria in html alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-html-20","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","aria-in-html","semantics","w3c","robots-alignment","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria-html check:20","humanCommand":"Check aria-in-html mappings and invalid role overrides; review the robots-alignment evidence dimension for ARIA in HTML Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-html-21","testId":"ni-wai-aria-html-21","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Llms Structure","description":"Validates llms.txt structure, readability, endpoint coverage, and agent usefulness for allowed aria usage in HTML semantics and role conflicts prevention. Evidence should include plain-text section and line-length evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Llms Structure appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms structure evidence for aria in html alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-html-21","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","aria-in-html","semantics","w3c","llms-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria-html check:21","humanCommand":"Check aria-in-html mappings and invalid role overrides; review the llms-structure evidence dimension for ARIA in HTML Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-html-22","testId":"ni-wai-aria-html-22","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Llms Index Schema","description":"Validates llms-index JSON schema shape and count reconciliation for allowed aria usage in HTML semantics and role conflicts prevention. Evidence should include JSON keys, counts, and endpoint evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Llms Index Schema appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms index schema evidence for aria in html alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-html-22","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","aria-in-html","semantics","w3c","llms-index-schema","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria-html check:22","humanCommand":"Check aria-in-html mappings and invalid role overrides; review the llms-index-schema evidence dimension for ARIA in HTML Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-html-23","testId":"ni-wai-aria-html-23","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Humans Attribution","description":"Validates humans.txt attribution, maintainer, technology, and governance transparency for allowed aria usage in HTML semantics and role conflicts prevention. Evidence should include humans.txt section evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Humans Attribution appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the humans attribution evidence for aria in html alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-html-23","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","aria-in-html","semantics","w3c","humans-attribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria-html check:23","humanCommand":"Check aria-in-html mappings and invalid role overrides; review the humans-attribution evidence dimension for ARIA in HTML Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-html-24","testId":"ni-wai-aria-html-24","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Agent Policy","description":"Validates agent-policy JSON clarity for allowed, disallowed, and protected operations for allowed aria usage in HTML semantics and role conflicts prevention. Evidence should include well-known policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Agent Policy appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the agent policy evidence for aria in html alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-html-24","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","aria-in-html","semantics","w3c","agent-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria-html check:24","humanCommand":"Check aria-in-html mappings and invalid role overrides; review the agent-policy evidence dimension for ARIA in HTML Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-html-25","testId":"ni-wai-aria-html-25","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Ai Policy","description":"Validates AI policy clarity for training, search, answer use, caching, and attribution for allowed aria usage in HTML semantics and role conflicts prevention. Evidence should include well-known AI policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Ai Policy appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ai policy evidence for aria in html alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-html-25","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","aria-in-html","semantics","w3c","ai-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria-html check:25","humanCommand":"Check aria-in-html mappings and invalid role overrides; review the ai-policy evidence dimension for ARIA in HTML Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-html-26","testId":"ni-wai-aria-html-26","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Trust Policy","description":"Validates trust policy coverage for privacy, traceability, metadata, and protected actions for allowed aria usage in HTML semantics and role conflicts prevention. Evidence should include trust.json evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Trust Policy appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the trust policy evidence for aria in html alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-html-26","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","aria-in-html","semantics","w3c","trust-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria-html check:26","humanCommand":"Check aria-in-html mappings and invalid role overrides; review the trust-policy evidence dimension for ARIA in HTML Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-html-27","testId":"ni-wai-aria-html-27","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Openapi Contract","description":"Validates OpenAPI availability, server URL accuracy, schemas, and auth policy for allowed aria usage in HTML semantics and role conflicts prevention. Evidence should include OpenAPI text/JSON evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Openapi Contract appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the openapi contract evidence for aria in html alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-html-27","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","aria-in-html","semantics","w3c","openapi-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria-html check:27","humanCommand":"Check aria-in-html mappings and invalid role overrides; review the openapi-contract evidence dimension for ARIA in HTML Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-html-28","testId":"ni-wai-aria-html-28","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Mcp Contract","description":"Validates MCP JSON-RPC introspection, real tools, resources, and protected boundaries for allowed aria usage in HTML semantics and role conflicts prevention. Evidence should include MCP manifest and initialize evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Mcp Contract appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the mcp contract evidence for aria in html alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-html-28","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","aria-in-html","semantics","w3c","mcp-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria-html check:28","humanCommand":"Check aria-in-html mappings and invalid role overrides; review the mcp-contract evidence dimension for ARIA in HTML Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-html-29","testId":"ni-wai-aria-html-29","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Api Error Shape","description":"Validates API success/error response shape consistency for allowed aria usage in HTML semantics and role conflicts prevention. Evidence should include REST envelope evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Api Error Shape appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the api error shape evidence for aria in html alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-html-29","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","aria-in-html","semantics","w3c","api-error-shape","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria-html check:29","humanCommand":"Check aria-in-html mappings and invalid role overrides; review the api-error-shape evidence dimension for ARIA in HTML Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-html-30","testId":"ni-wai-aria-html-30","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Traceability","description":"Validates trace propagation, request IDs, and safe observability correlation for allowed aria usage in HTML semantics and role conflicts prevention. Evidence should include trace header and metadata evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Traceability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the traceability evidence for aria in html alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-html-30","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","aria-in-html","semantics","w3c","traceability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria-html check:30","humanCommand":"Check aria-in-html mappings and invalid role overrides; review the traceability evidence dimension for ARIA in HTML Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-html-31","testId":"ni-wai-aria-html-31","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Ja4 Redaction","description":"Validates fingerprint-adjacent metadata redaction and non-public raw JA4 handling for allowed aria usage in HTML semantics and role conflicts prevention. Evidence should include metadata policy and redaction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Ja4 Redaction appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the ja4 redaction evidence for aria in html alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-html-31","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","aria-in-html","semantics","w3c","ja4-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria-html check:31","humanCommand":"Check aria-in-html mappings and invalid role overrides; review the ja4-redaction evidence dimension for ARIA in HTML Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-html-32","testId":"ni-wai-aria-html-32","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Secret Redaction","description":"Validates absence of secrets, generic key examples, cookies, and raw tokens in public outputs for allowed aria usage in HTML semantics and role conflicts prevention. Evidence should include public artifact scan evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Secret Redaction appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the secret redaction evidence for aria in html alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-html-32","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","aria-in-html","semantics","w3c","secret-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria-html check:32","humanCommand":"Check aria-in-html mappings and invalid role overrides; review the secret-redaction evidence dimension for ARIA in HTML Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-html-33","testId":"ni-wai-aria-html-33","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Security Headers","description":"Validates security header coverage and hardened transport signals for allowed aria usage in HTML semantics and role conflicts prevention. Evidence should include HTTP header evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Security Headers appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the security headers evidence for aria in html alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-html-33","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","aria-in-html","semantics","w3c","security-headers","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria-html check:33","humanCommand":"Check aria-in-html mappings and invalid role overrides; review the security-headers evidence dimension for ARIA in HTML Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-html-34","testId":"ni-wai-aria-html-34","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Privacy Consent","description":"Validates privacy policy, consent, attribution, and data-use disclosure quality for allowed aria usage in HTML semantics and role conflicts prevention. Evidence should include public page and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Privacy Consent appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the privacy consent evidence for aria in html alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-html-34","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","aria-in-html","semantics","w3c","privacy-consent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria-html check:34","humanCommand":"Check aria-in-html mappings and invalid role overrides; review the privacy-consent evidence dimension for ARIA in HTML Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-html-35","testId":"ni-wai-aria-html-35","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Structured Data","description":"Validates JSON-LD and entity modeling for machine interpretation for allowed aria usage in HTML semantics and role conflicts prevention. Evidence should include schema block and parse evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Structured Data appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the structured data evidence for aria in html alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-html-35","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","aria-in-html","semantics","w3c","structured-data","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria-html check:35","humanCommand":"Check aria-in-html mappings and invalid role overrides; review the structured-data evidence dimension for ARIA in HTML Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-html-36","testId":"ni-wai-aria-html-36","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Social Preview","description":"Validates Open Graph and Twitter/X card readiness for public sharing for allowed aria usage in HTML semantics and role conflicts prevention. Evidence should include meta tag evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Social Preview appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the social preview evidence for aria in html alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-html-36","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","aria-in-html","semantics","w3c","social-preview","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria-html check:36","humanCommand":"Check aria-in-html mappings and invalid role overrides; review the social-preview evidence dimension for ARIA in HTML Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-html-37","testId":"ni-wai-aria-html-37","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: I18n Routing","description":"Validates locale route, hreflang, language declaration, and translation readiness for allowed aria usage in HTML semantics and role conflicts prevention. Evidence should include lang/hreflang and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: I18n Routing appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the i18n routing evidence for aria in html alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-html-37","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","aria-in-html","semantics","w3c","i18n-routing","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria-html check:37","humanCommand":"Check aria-in-html mappings and invalid role overrides; review the i18n-routing evidence dimension for ARIA in HTML Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-html-38","testId":"ni-wai-aria-html-38","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Readability","description":"Validates human readability, sectioning, sentence complexity, and comprehension support for allowed aria usage in HTML semantics and role conflicts prevention. Evidence should include extracted content evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Readability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the readability evidence for aria in html alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-html-38","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","aria-in-html","semantics","w3c","readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria-html check:38","humanCommand":"Check aria-in-html mappings and invalid role overrides; review the readability evidence dimension for ARIA in HTML Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-html-39","testId":"ni-wai-aria-html-39","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Content Utility","description":"Validates non-placeholder content usefulness and domain-specific public value for allowed aria usage in HTML semantics and role conflicts prevention. Evidence should include content extraction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Content Utility appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the content utility evidence for aria in html alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-html-39","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","aria-in-html","semantics","w3c","content-utility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria-html check:39","humanCommand":"Check aria-in-html mappings and invalid role overrides; review the content-utility evidence dimension for ARIA in HTML Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-html-40","testId":"ni-wai-aria-html-40","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Recommendation Grounding","description":"Validates recommendation grounding in deterministic evidence instead of fabricated model output for allowed aria usage in HTML semantics and role conflicts prevention. Evidence should include issue and remediation evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Recommendation Grounding appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the recommendation grounding evidence for aria in html alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-html-40","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","aria-in-html","semantics","w3c","recommendation-grounding","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria-html check:40","humanCommand":"Check aria-in-html mappings and invalid role overrides; review the recommendation-grounding evidence dimension for ARIA in HTML Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-html-41","testId":"ni-wai-aria-html-41","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Evidence Quality","description":"Validates evidence completeness, public safety, and reproducibility for allowed aria usage in HTML semantics and role conflicts prevention. Evidence should include test output and artifact evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Evidence Quality appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the evidence quality evidence for aria in html alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-html-41","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","aria-in-html","semantics","w3c","evidence-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria-html check:41","humanCommand":"Check aria-in-html mappings and invalid role overrides; review the evidence-quality evidence dimension for ARIA in HTML Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-html-42","testId":"ni-wai-aria-html-42","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Threshold Policy","description":"Validates threshold clarity, pass/warn/fail semantics, and scoring transparency for allowed aria usage in HTML semantics and role conflicts prevention. Evidence should include threshold and result status evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Threshold Policy appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the threshold policy evidence for aria in html alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-html-42","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","aria-in-html","semantics","w3c","threshold-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria-html check:42","humanCommand":"Check aria-in-html mappings and invalid role overrides; review the threshold-policy evidence dimension for ARIA in HTML Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-html-43","testId":"ni-wai-aria-html-43","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Confidence","description":"Validates confidence scoring and degraded-input disclosure for allowed aria usage in HTML semantics and role conflicts prevention. Evidence should include source freshness and input availability evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Confidence appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the confidence evidence for aria in html alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-html-43","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","aria-in-html","semantics","w3c","confidence","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria-html check:43","humanCommand":"Check aria-in-html mappings and invalid role overrides; review the confidence evidence dimension for ARIA in HTML Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-html-44","testId":"ni-wai-aria-html-44","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Trend Readiness","description":"Validates historical comparability and timeline readiness for future reruns for allowed aria usage in HTML semantics and role conflicts prevention. Evidence should include analysis ID, timestamp, and persistence evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Trend Readiness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the trend readiness evidence for aria in html alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-html-44","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","aria-in-html","semantics","w3c","trend-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria-html check:44","humanCommand":"Check aria-in-html mappings and invalid role overrides; review the trend-readiness evidence dimension for ARIA in HTML Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-html-45","testId":"ni-wai-aria-html-45","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Ranking Readiness","description":"Validates ranking input completeness and profile compatibility for allowed aria usage in HTML semantics and role conflicts prevention. Evidence should include score and profile evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Ranking Readiness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ranking readiness evidence for aria in html alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-html-45","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","aria-in-html","semantics","w3c","ranking-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria-html check:45","humanCommand":"Check aria-in-html mappings and invalid role overrides; review the ranking-readiness evidence dimension for ARIA in HTML Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-html-46","testId":"ni-wai-aria-html-46","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Network Contribution","description":"Validates PlatPhorm network contribution through discovery, integrations, and standards compliance for allowed aria usage in HTML semantics and role conflicts prevention. Evidence should include network graph and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Network Contribution appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the network contribution evidence for aria in html alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-html-46","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","aria-in-html","semantics","w3c","network-contribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria-html check:46","humanCommand":"Check aria-in-html mappings and invalid role overrides; review the network-contribution evidence dimension for ARIA in HTML Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-html-47","testId":"ni-wai-aria-html-47","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Report Readiness","description":"Validates report/export categorization with public-safe evidence and protected boundaries for allowed aria usage in HTML semantics and role conflicts prevention. Evidence should include report section mapping evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Report Readiness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the report readiness evidence for aria in html alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-html-47","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","aria-in-html","semantics","w3c","report-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria-html check:47","humanCommand":"Check aria-in-html mappings and invalid role overrides; review the report-readiness evidence dimension for ARIA in HTML Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-html-48","testId":"ni-wai-aria-html-48","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Operator Actionability","description":"Validates clear remediation, owner action, difficulty, and retest path for allowed aria usage in HTML semantics and role conflicts prevention. Evidence should include fix instructions and command evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Operator Actionability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the operator actionability evidence for aria in html alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-html-48","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","aria-in-html","semantics","w3c","operator-actionability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria-html check:48","humanCommand":"Check aria-in-html mappings and invalid role overrides; review the operator-actionability evidence dimension for ARIA in HTML Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-html-49","testId":"ni-wai-aria-html-49","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Degraded State","description":"Validates honest degraded, unavailable, skipped, and not-applicable states for allowed aria usage in HTML semantics and role conflicts prevention. Evidence should include status and storage evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Degraded State appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the degraded state evidence for aria in html alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-html-49","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","aria-in-html","semantics","w3c","degraded-state","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria-html check:49","humanCommand":"Check aria-in-html mappings and invalid role overrides; review the degraded-state evidence dimension for ARIA in HTML Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-aria-html-50","testId":"ni-wai-aria-html-50","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Reproducibility","description":"Validates stable CLI/API/human reproduction path and deterministic rerun instructions for allowed aria usage in HTML semantics and role conflicts prevention. Evidence should include commands and registry version evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA in HTML Alignment: Reproducibility appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the reproducibility evidence for aria in html alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-aria-html-50","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","aria-in-html","semantics","w3c","reproducibility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules aria-* # group:wai-aria-html check:50","humanCommand":"Check aria-in-html mappings and invalid role overrides; review the reproducibility evidence dimension for ARIA in HTML Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-accname-01","testId":"ni-wai-accname-01","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessible Name Computation: Availability","description":"Validates public route availability and successful bounded fetch behavior for accessible name and description consistency for interactive controls. Evidence should include HTTP status, timeout, and redirect evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessible Name Computation: Availability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the availability evidence for accessible name computation, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-accname-01","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","accname","screen-reader","w3c","availability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules button-name,link-name,label # group:wai-accname check:1","humanCommand":"Validate accessible name/description calculations for controls and widgets; review the availability evidence dimension for Accessible Name Computation"}},{"id":"ni-wai-accname-02","testId":"ni-wai-accname-02","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessible Name Computation: Public Safety","description":"Validates public-safe access boundaries without exposing private or protected data for accessible name and description consistency for interactive controls. Evidence should include route policy and response-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessible Name Computation: Public Safety appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the public safety evidence for accessible name computation, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-accname-02","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","accname","screen-reader","w3c","public-safety","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules button-name,link-name,label # group:wai-accname check:2","humanCommand":"Validate accessible name/description calculations for controls and widgets; review the public-safety evidence dimension for Accessible Name Computation"}},{"id":"ni-wai-accname-03","testId":"ni-wai-accname-03","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessible Name Computation: Canonical Url","description":"Validates canonical URL stability and normalized route identity for accessible name and description consistency for interactive controls. Evidence should include canonical tags, redirects, and normalized URL evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessible Name Computation: Canonical Url appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the canonical url evidence for accessible name computation, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-accname-03","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","accname","screen-reader","w3c","canonical-url","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules button-name,link-name,label # group:wai-accname check:3","humanCommand":"Validate accessible name/description calculations for controls and widgets; review the canonical-url evidence dimension for Accessible Name Computation"}},{"id":"ni-wai-accname-04","testId":"ni-wai-accname-04","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessible Name Computation: Metadata Clarity","description":"Validates title, description, and page-specific metadata clarity for accessible name and description consistency for interactive controls. Evidence should include HTML metadata and extracted text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessible Name Computation: Metadata Clarity appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the metadata clarity evidence for accessible name computation, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-accname-04","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","accname","screen-reader","w3c","metadata-clarity","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules button-name,link-name,label # group:wai-accname check:4","humanCommand":"Validate accessible name/description calculations for controls and widgets; review the metadata-clarity evidence dimension for Accessible Name Computation"}},{"id":"ni-wai-accname-05","testId":"ni-wai-accname-05","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessible Name Computation: Semantic Structure","description":"Validates semantic HTML structure for humans, agents, and assistive technology for accessible name and description consistency for interactive controls. Evidence should include heading, landmark, and element evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessible Name Computation: Semantic Structure appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the semantic structure evidence for accessible name computation, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-accname-05","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","accname","screen-reader","w3c","semantic-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules button-name,link-name,label # group:wai-accname check:5","humanCommand":"Validate accessible name/description calculations for controls and widgets; review the semantic-structure evidence dimension for Accessible Name Computation"}},{"id":"ni-wai-accname-06","testId":"ni-wai-accname-06","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessible Name Computation: Machine Readability","description":"Validates machine-readable public content and predictable parsing surfaces for accessible name and description consistency for interactive controls. Evidence should include structured tags, JSON-LD, and document-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessible Name Computation: Machine Readability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the machine readability evidence for accessible name computation, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-accname-06","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","accname","screen-reader","w3c","machine-readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules button-name,link-name,label # group:wai-accname check:6","humanCommand":"Validate accessible name/description calculations for controls and widgets; review the machine-readability evidence dimension for Accessible Name Computation"}},{"id":"ni-wai-accname-07","testId":"ni-wai-accname-07","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessible Name Computation: Agent Discovery","description":"Validates agent discovery hints and AI-readable policy/documentation signals for accessible name and description consistency for interactive controls. Evidence should include llms, policy, MCP, OpenAPI, or schema evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessible Name Computation: Agent Discovery appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the agent discovery evidence for accessible name computation, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-accname-07","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","accname","screen-reader","w3c","agent-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules button-name,link-name,label # group:wai-accname check:7","humanCommand":"Validate accessible name/description calculations for controls and widgets; review the agent-discovery evidence dimension for Accessible Name Computation"}},{"id":"ni-wai-accname-08","testId":"ni-wai-accname-08","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessible Name Computation: Crawler Discovery","description":"Validates crawler discovery paths through robots, sitemap, feeds, and canonical links for accessible name and description consistency for interactive controls. Evidence should include discovery artifact and link evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessible Name Computation: Crawler Discovery appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the crawler discovery evidence for accessible name computation, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-accname-08","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","accname","screen-reader","w3c","crawler-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules button-name,link-name,label # group:wai-accname check:8","humanCommand":"Validate accessible name/description calculations for controls and widgets; review the crawler-discovery evidence dimension for Accessible Name Computation"}},{"id":"ni-wai-accname-09","testId":"ni-wai-accname-09","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessible Name Computation: Answerability","description":"Validates direct answer extraction and quotable explanatory content for accessible name and description consistency for interactive controls. Evidence should include question, summary, heading, and paragraph evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessible Name Computation: Answerability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the answerability evidence for accessible name computation, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-accname-09","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","accname","screen-reader","w3c","answerability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules button-name,link-name,label # group:wai-accname check:9","humanCommand":"Validate accessible name/description calculations for controls and widgets; review the answerability evidence dimension for Accessible Name Computation"}},{"id":"ni-wai-accname-10","testId":"ni-wai-accname-10","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessible Name Computation: Generative Context","description":"Validates GEO context quality for generative engines without inventing measured facts for accessible name and description consistency for interactive controls. Evidence should include entity, source, and instruction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessible Name Computation: Generative Context appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the generative context evidence for accessible name computation, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-accname-10","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","accname","screen-reader","w3c","generative-context","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules button-name,link-name,label # group:wai-accname check:10","humanCommand":"Validate accessible name/description calculations for controls and widgets; review the generative-context evidence dimension for Accessible Name Computation"}},{"id":"ni-wai-accname-11","testId":"ni-wai-accname-11","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessible Name Computation: Search Intent","description":"Validates search intent alignment and snippet-friendly content structure for accessible name and description consistency for interactive controls. Evidence should include metadata, headings, and topical text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessible Name Computation: Search Intent appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the search intent evidence for accessible name computation, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-accname-11","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","accname","screen-reader","w3c","search-intent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules button-name,link-name,label # group:wai-accname check:11","humanCommand":"Validate accessible name/description calculations for controls and widgets; review the search-intent evidence dimension for Accessible Name Computation"}},{"id":"ni-wai-accname-12","testId":"ni-wai-accname-12","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessible Name Computation: Accessibility Semantics","description":"Validates accessible names, relationships, landmarks, and keyboard-relevant structure for accessible name and description consistency for interactive controls. Evidence should include ARIA, labels, landmarks, and control evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessible Name Computation: Accessibility Semantics appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the accessibility semantics evidence for accessible name computation, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-accname-12","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","accname","screen-reader","w3c","accessibility-semantics","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules button-name,link-name,label # group:wai-accname check:12","humanCommand":"Validate accessible name/description calculations for controls and widgets; review the accessibility-semantics evidence dimension for Accessible Name Computation"}},{"id":"ni-wai-accname-13","testId":"ni-wai-accname-13","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessible Name Computation: Mobile Readiness","description":"Validates mobile viewport, responsive content, and touch-friendly layout signals for accessible name and description consistency for interactive controls. Evidence should include viewport and responsive asset evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessible Name Computation: Mobile Readiness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the mobile readiness evidence for accessible name computation, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-accname-13","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","accname","screen-reader","w3c","mobile-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules button-name,link-name,label # group:wai-accname check:13","humanCommand":"Validate accessible name/description calculations for controls and widgets; review the mobile-readiness evidence dimension for Accessible Name Computation"}},{"id":"ni-wai-accname-14","testId":"ni-wai-accname-14","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessible Name Computation: Performance Budget","description":"Validates performance budget compliance using measured or bounded deterministic inputs for accessible name and description consistency for interactive controls. Evidence should include timing, byte, and Lighthouse-derived evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessible Name Computation: Performance Budget appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the performance budget evidence for accessible name computation, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-accname-14","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","accname","screen-reader","w3c","performance-budget","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules button-name,link-name,label # group:wai-accname check:14","humanCommand":"Validate accessible name/description calculations for controls and widgets; review the performance-budget evidence dimension for Accessible Name Computation"}},{"id":"ni-wai-accname-15","testId":"ni-wai-accname-15","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessible Name Computation: Resource Efficiency","description":"Validates resource size, script/style count, and optimization opportunity signals for accessible name and description consistency for interactive controls. Evidence should include resource and markup evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessible Name Computation: Resource Efficiency appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the resource efficiency evidence for accessible name computation, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-accname-15","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","accname","screen-reader","w3c","resource-efficiency","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules button-name,link-name,label # group:wai-accname check:15","humanCommand":"Validate accessible name/description calculations for controls and widgets; review the resource-efficiency evidence dimension for Accessible Name Computation"}},{"id":"ni-wai-accname-16","testId":"ni-wai-accname-16","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessible Name Computation: Cache Freshness","description":"Validates cache behavior, freshness hints, and stale-content risk for accessible name and description consistency for interactive controls. Evidence should include HTTP cache and timestamp evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessible Name Computation: Cache Freshness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the cache freshness evidence for accessible name computation, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-accname-16","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","accname","screen-reader","w3c","cache-freshness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules button-name,link-name,label # group:wai-accname check:16","humanCommand":"Validate accessible name/description calculations for controls and widgets; review the cache-freshness evidence dimension for Accessible Name Computation"}},{"id":"ni-wai-accname-17","testId":"ni-wai-accname-17","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessible Name Computation: Route Reliability","description":"Validates route reliability, redirect safety, and dead-link risk for accessible name and description consistency for interactive controls. Evidence should include status, redirect, and sitemap evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessible Name Computation: Route Reliability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the route reliability evidence for accessible name computation, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-accname-17","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","accname","screen-reader","w3c","route-reliability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules button-name,link-name,label # group:wai-accname check:17","humanCommand":"Validate accessible name/description calculations for controls and widgets; review the route-reliability evidence dimension for Accessible Name Computation"}},{"id":"ni-wai-accname-18","testId":"ni-wai-accname-18","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessible Name Computation: Feed Quality","description":"Validates RSS/Atom/feed usefulness, parseability, and freshness for accessible name and description consistency for interactive controls. Evidence should include feed XML and item evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessible Name Computation: Feed Quality appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the feed quality evidence for accessible name computation, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-accname-18","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","accname","screen-reader","w3c","feed-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules button-name,link-name,label # group:wai-accname check:18","humanCommand":"Validate accessible name/description calculations for controls and widgets; review the feed-quality evidence dimension for Accessible Name Computation"}},{"id":"ni-wai-accname-19","testId":"ni-wai-accname-19","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessible Name Computation: Sitemap Quality","description":"Validates sitemap validity, public-safe URL coverage, and no-dead-link policy for accessible name and description consistency for interactive controls. Evidence should include sitemap XML and bounded link-check evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessible Name Computation: Sitemap Quality appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the sitemap quality evidence for accessible name computation, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-accname-19","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","accname","screen-reader","w3c","sitemap-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules button-name,link-name,label # group:wai-accname check:19","humanCommand":"Validate accessible name/description calculations for controls and widgets; review the sitemap-quality evidence dimension for Accessible Name Computation"}},{"id":"ni-wai-accname-20","testId":"ni-wai-accname-20","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessible Name Computation: Robots Alignment","description":"Validates robots.txt alignment with public/protected policy and sitemap discovery for accessible name and description consistency for interactive controls. Evidence should include robots directives and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessible Name Computation: Robots Alignment appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the robots alignment evidence for accessible name computation, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-accname-20","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","accname","screen-reader","w3c","robots-alignment","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules button-name,link-name,label # group:wai-accname check:20","humanCommand":"Validate accessible name/description calculations for controls and widgets; review the robots-alignment evidence dimension for Accessible Name Computation"}},{"id":"ni-wai-accname-21","testId":"ni-wai-accname-21","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessible Name Computation: Llms Structure","description":"Validates llms.txt structure, readability, endpoint coverage, and agent usefulness for accessible name and description consistency for interactive controls. Evidence should include plain-text section and line-length evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessible Name Computation: Llms Structure appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms structure evidence for accessible name computation, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-accname-21","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","accname","screen-reader","w3c","llms-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules button-name,link-name,label # group:wai-accname check:21","humanCommand":"Validate accessible name/description calculations for controls and widgets; review the llms-structure evidence dimension for Accessible Name Computation"}},{"id":"ni-wai-accname-22","testId":"ni-wai-accname-22","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessible Name Computation: Llms Index Schema","description":"Validates llms-index JSON schema shape and count reconciliation for accessible name and description consistency for interactive controls. Evidence should include JSON keys, counts, and endpoint evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessible Name Computation: Llms Index Schema appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms index schema evidence for accessible name computation, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-accname-22","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","accname","screen-reader","w3c","llms-index-schema","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules button-name,link-name,label # group:wai-accname check:22","humanCommand":"Validate accessible name/description calculations for controls and widgets; review the llms-index-schema evidence dimension for Accessible Name Computation"}},{"id":"ni-wai-accname-23","testId":"ni-wai-accname-23","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessible Name Computation: Humans Attribution","description":"Validates humans.txt attribution, maintainer, technology, and governance transparency for accessible name and description consistency for interactive controls. Evidence should include humans.txt section evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessible Name Computation: Humans Attribution appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the humans attribution evidence for accessible name computation, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-accname-23","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","accname","screen-reader","w3c","humans-attribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules button-name,link-name,label # group:wai-accname check:23","humanCommand":"Validate accessible name/description calculations for controls and widgets; review the humans-attribution evidence dimension for Accessible Name Computation"}},{"id":"ni-wai-accname-24","testId":"ni-wai-accname-24","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessible Name Computation: Agent Policy","description":"Validates agent-policy JSON clarity for allowed, disallowed, and protected operations for accessible name and description consistency for interactive controls. Evidence should include well-known policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessible Name Computation: Agent Policy appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the agent policy evidence for accessible name computation, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-accname-24","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","accname","screen-reader","w3c","agent-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules button-name,link-name,label # group:wai-accname check:24","humanCommand":"Validate accessible name/description calculations for controls and widgets; review the agent-policy evidence dimension for Accessible Name Computation"}},{"id":"ni-wai-accname-25","testId":"ni-wai-accname-25","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessible Name Computation: Ai Policy","description":"Validates AI policy clarity for training, search, answer use, caching, and attribution for accessible name and description consistency for interactive controls. Evidence should include well-known AI policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessible Name Computation: Ai Policy appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ai policy evidence for accessible name computation, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-accname-25","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","accname","screen-reader","w3c","ai-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules button-name,link-name,label # group:wai-accname check:25","humanCommand":"Validate accessible name/description calculations for controls and widgets; review the ai-policy evidence dimension for Accessible Name Computation"}},{"id":"ni-wai-accname-26","testId":"ni-wai-accname-26","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessible Name Computation: Trust Policy","description":"Validates trust policy coverage for privacy, traceability, metadata, and protected actions for accessible name and description consistency for interactive controls. Evidence should include trust.json evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessible Name Computation: Trust Policy appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the trust policy evidence for accessible name computation, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-accname-26","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","accname","screen-reader","w3c","trust-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules button-name,link-name,label # group:wai-accname check:26","humanCommand":"Validate accessible name/description calculations for controls and widgets; review the trust-policy evidence dimension for Accessible Name Computation"}},{"id":"ni-wai-accname-27","testId":"ni-wai-accname-27","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessible Name Computation: Openapi Contract","description":"Validates OpenAPI availability, server URL accuracy, schemas, and auth policy for accessible name and description consistency for interactive controls. Evidence should include OpenAPI text/JSON evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessible Name Computation: Openapi Contract appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the openapi contract evidence for accessible name computation, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-accname-27","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","accname","screen-reader","w3c","openapi-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules button-name,link-name,label # group:wai-accname check:27","humanCommand":"Validate accessible name/description calculations for controls and widgets; review the openapi-contract evidence dimension for Accessible Name Computation"}},{"id":"ni-wai-accname-28","testId":"ni-wai-accname-28","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessible Name Computation: Mcp Contract","description":"Validates MCP JSON-RPC introspection, real tools, resources, and protected boundaries for accessible name and description consistency for interactive controls. Evidence should include MCP manifest and initialize evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessible Name Computation: Mcp Contract appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the mcp contract evidence for accessible name computation, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-accname-28","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","accname","screen-reader","w3c","mcp-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules button-name,link-name,label # group:wai-accname check:28","humanCommand":"Validate accessible name/description calculations for controls and widgets; review the mcp-contract evidence dimension for Accessible Name Computation"}},{"id":"ni-wai-accname-29","testId":"ni-wai-accname-29","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessible Name Computation: Api Error Shape","description":"Validates API success/error response shape consistency for accessible name and description consistency for interactive controls. Evidence should include REST envelope evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessible Name Computation: Api Error Shape appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the api error shape evidence for accessible name computation, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-accname-29","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","accname","screen-reader","w3c","api-error-shape","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules button-name,link-name,label # group:wai-accname check:29","humanCommand":"Validate accessible name/description calculations for controls and widgets; review the api-error-shape evidence dimension for Accessible Name Computation"}},{"id":"ni-wai-accname-30","testId":"ni-wai-accname-30","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessible Name Computation: Traceability","description":"Validates trace propagation, request IDs, and safe observability correlation for accessible name and description consistency for interactive controls. Evidence should include trace header and metadata evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessible Name Computation: Traceability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the traceability evidence for accessible name computation, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-accname-30","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","accname","screen-reader","w3c","traceability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules button-name,link-name,label # group:wai-accname check:30","humanCommand":"Validate accessible name/description calculations for controls and widgets; review the traceability evidence dimension for Accessible Name Computation"}},{"id":"ni-wai-accname-31","testId":"ni-wai-accname-31","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessible Name Computation: Ja4 Redaction","description":"Validates fingerprint-adjacent metadata redaction and non-public raw JA4 handling for accessible name and description consistency for interactive controls. Evidence should include metadata policy and redaction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessible Name Computation: Ja4 Redaction appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the ja4 redaction evidence for accessible name computation, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-accname-31","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","accname","screen-reader","w3c","ja4-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules button-name,link-name,label # group:wai-accname check:31","humanCommand":"Validate accessible name/description calculations for controls and widgets; review the ja4-redaction evidence dimension for Accessible Name Computation"}},{"id":"ni-wai-accname-32","testId":"ni-wai-accname-32","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessible Name Computation: Secret Redaction","description":"Validates absence of secrets, generic key examples, cookies, and raw tokens in public outputs for accessible name and description consistency for interactive controls. Evidence should include public artifact scan evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessible Name Computation: Secret Redaction appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the secret redaction evidence for accessible name computation, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-accname-32","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","accname","screen-reader","w3c","secret-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules button-name,link-name,label # group:wai-accname check:32","humanCommand":"Validate accessible name/description calculations for controls and widgets; review the secret-redaction evidence dimension for Accessible Name Computation"}},{"id":"ni-wai-accname-33","testId":"ni-wai-accname-33","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessible Name Computation: Security Headers","description":"Validates security header coverage and hardened transport signals for accessible name and description consistency for interactive controls. Evidence should include HTTP header evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessible Name Computation: Security Headers appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the security headers evidence for accessible name computation, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-accname-33","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","accname","screen-reader","w3c","security-headers","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules button-name,link-name,label # group:wai-accname check:33","humanCommand":"Validate accessible name/description calculations for controls and widgets; review the security-headers evidence dimension for Accessible Name Computation"}},{"id":"ni-wai-accname-34","testId":"ni-wai-accname-34","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessible Name Computation: Privacy Consent","description":"Validates privacy policy, consent, attribution, and data-use disclosure quality for accessible name and description consistency for interactive controls. Evidence should include public page and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessible Name Computation: Privacy Consent appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the privacy consent evidence for accessible name computation, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-accname-34","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","accname","screen-reader","w3c","privacy-consent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules button-name,link-name,label # group:wai-accname check:34","humanCommand":"Validate accessible name/description calculations for controls and widgets; review the privacy-consent evidence dimension for Accessible Name Computation"}},{"id":"ni-wai-accname-35","testId":"ni-wai-accname-35","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessible Name Computation: Structured Data","description":"Validates JSON-LD and entity modeling for machine interpretation for accessible name and description consistency for interactive controls. Evidence should include schema block and parse evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessible Name Computation: Structured Data appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the structured data evidence for accessible name computation, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-accname-35","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","accname","screen-reader","w3c","structured-data","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules button-name,link-name,label # group:wai-accname check:35","humanCommand":"Validate accessible name/description calculations for controls and widgets; review the structured-data evidence dimension for Accessible Name Computation"}},{"id":"ni-wai-accname-36","testId":"ni-wai-accname-36","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessible Name Computation: Social Preview","description":"Validates Open Graph and Twitter/X card readiness for public sharing for accessible name and description consistency for interactive controls. Evidence should include meta tag evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessible Name Computation: Social Preview appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the social preview evidence for accessible name computation, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-accname-36","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","accname","screen-reader","w3c","social-preview","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules button-name,link-name,label # group:wai-accname check:36","humanCommand":"Validate accessible name/description calculations for controls and widgets; review the social-preview evidence dimension for Accessible Name Computation"}},{"id":"ni-wai-accname-37","testId":"ni-wai-accname-37","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessible Name Computation: I18n Routing","description":"Validates locale route, hreflang, language declaration, and translation readiness for accessible name and description consistency for interactive controls. Evidence should include lang/hreflang and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessible Name Computation: I18n Routing appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the i18n routing evidence for accessible name computation, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-accname-37","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","accname","screen-reader","w3c","i18n-routing","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules button-name,link-name,label # group:wai-accname check:37","humanCommand":"Validate accessible name/description calculations for controls and widgets; review the i18n-routing evidence dimension for Accessible Name Computation"}},{"id":"ni-wai-accname-38","testId":"ni-wai-accname-38","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessible Name Computation: Readability","description":"Validates human readability, sectioning, sentence complexity, and comprehension support for accessible name and description consistency for interactive controls. Evidence should include extracted content evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessible Name Computation: Readability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the readability evidence for accessible name computation, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-accname-38","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","accname","screen-reader","w3c","readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules button-name,link-name,label # group:wai-accname check:38","humanCommand":"Validate accessible name/description calculations for controls and widgets; review the readability evidence dimension for Accessible Name Computation"}},{"id":"ni-wai-accname-39","testId":"ni-wai-accname-39","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessible Name Computation: Content Utility","description":"Validates non-placeholder content usefulness and domain-specific public value for accessible name and description consistency for interactive controls. Evidence should include content extraction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessible Name Computation: Content Utility appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the content utility evidence for accessible name computation, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-accname-39","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","accname","screen-reader","w3c","content-utility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules button-name,link-name,label # group:wai-accname check:39","humanCommand":"Validate accessible name/description calculations for controls and widgets; review the content-utility evidence dimension for Accessible Name Computation"}},{"id":"ni-wai-accname-40","testId":"ni-wai-accname-40","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessible Name Computation: Recommendation Grounding","description":"Validates recommendation grounding in deterministic evidence instead of fabricated model output for accessible name and description consistency for interactive controls. Evidence should include issue and remediation evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessible Name Computation: Recommendation Grounding appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the recommendation grounding evidence for accessible name computation, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-accname-40","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","accname","screen-reader","w3c","recommendation-grounding","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules button-name,link-name,label # group:wai-accname check:40","humanCommand":"Validate accessible name/description calculations for controls and widgets; review the recommendation-grounding evidence dimension for Accessible Name Computation"}},{"id":"ni-wai-accname-41","testId":"ni-wai-accname-41","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessible Name Computation: Evidence Quality","description":"Validates evidence completeness, public safety, and reproducibility for accessible name and description consistency for interactive controls. Evidence should include test output and artifact evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessible Name Computation: Evidence Quality appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the evidence quality evidence for accessible name computation, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-accname-41","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","accname","screen-reader","w3c","evidence-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules button-name,link-name,label # group:wai-accname check:41","humanCommand":"Validate accessible name/description calculations for controls and widgets; review the evidence-quality evidence dimension for Accessible Name Computation"}},{"id":"ni-wai-accname-42","testId":"ni-wai-accname-42","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessible Name Computation: Threshold Policy","description":"Validates threshold clarity, pass/warn/fail semantics, and scoring transparency for accessible name and description consistency for interactive controls. Evidence should include threshold and result status evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessible Name Computation: Threshold Policy appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the threshold policy evidence for accessible name computation, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-accname-42","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","accname","screen-reader","w3c","threshold-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules button-name,link-name,label # group:wai-accname check:42","humanCommand":"Validate accessible name/description calculations for controls and widgets; review the threshold-policy evidence dimension for Accessible Name Computation"}},{"id":"ni-wai-accname-43","testId":"ni-wai-accname-43","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessible Name Computation: Confidence","description":"Validates confidence scoring and degraded-input disclosure for accessible name and description consistency for interactive controls. Evidence should include source freshness and input availability evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessible Name Computation: Confidence appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the confidence evidence for accessible name computation, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-accname-43","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","accname","screen-reader","w3c","confidence","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules button-name,link-name,label # group:wai-accname check:43","humanCommand":"Validate accessible name/description calculations for controls and widgets; review the confidence evidence dimension for Accessible Name Computation"}},{"id":"ni-wai-accname-44","testId":"ni-wai-accname-44","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessible Name Computation: Trend Readiness","description":"Validates historical comparability and timeline readiness for future reruns for accessible name and description consistency for interactive controls. Evidence should include analysis ID, timestamp, and persistence evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessible Name Computation: Trend Readiness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the trend readiness evidence for accessible name computation, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-accname-44","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","accname","screen-reader","w3c","trend-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules button-name,link-name,label # group:wai-accname check:44","humanCommand":"Validate accessible name/description calculations for controls and widgets; review the trend-readiness evidence dimension for Accessible Name Computation"}},{"id":"ni-wai-accname-45","testId":"ni-wai-accname-45","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessible Name Computation: Ranking Readiness","description":"Validates ranking input completeness and profile compatibility for accessible name and description consistency for interactive controls. Evidence should include score and profile evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessible Name Computation: Ranking Readiness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ranking readiness evidence for accessible name computation, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-accname-45","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","accname","screen-reader","w3c","ranking-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules button-name,link-name,label # group:wai-accname check:45","humanCommand":"Validate accessible name/description calculations for controls and widgets; review the ranking-readiness evidence dimension for Accessible Name Computation"}},{"id":"ni-wai-accname-46","testId":"ni-wai-accname-46","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessible Name Computation: Network Contribution","description":"Validates PlatPhorm network contribution through discovery, integrations, and standards compliance for accessible name and description consistency for interactive controls. Evidence should include network graph and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessible Name Computation: Network Contribution appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the network contribution evidence for accessible name computation, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-accname-46","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","accname","screen-reader","w3c","network-contribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules button-name,link-name,label # group:wai-accname check:46","humanCommand":"Validate accessible name/description calculations for controls and widgets; review the network-contribution evidence dimension for Accessible Name Computation"}},{"id":"ni-wai-accname-47","testId":"ni-wai-accname-47","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessible Name Computation: Report Readiness","description":"Validates report/export categorization with public-safe evidence and protected boundaries for accessible name and description consistency for interactive controls. Evidence should include report section mapping evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessible Name Computation: Report Readiness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the report readiness evidence for accessible name computation, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-accname-47","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","accname","screen-reader","w3c","report-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules button-name,link-name,label # group:wai-accname check:47","humanCommand":"Validate accessible name/description calculations for controls and widgets; review the report-readiness evidence dimension for Accessible Name Computation"}},{"id":"ni-wai-accname-48","testId":"ni-wai-accname-48","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessible Name Computation: Operator Actionability","description":"Validates clear remediation, owner action, difficulty, and retest path for accessible name and description consistency for interactive controls. Evidence should include fix instructions and command evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessible Name Computation: Operator Actionability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the operator actionability evidence for accessible name computation, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-accname-48","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","accname","screen-reader","w3c","operator-actionability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules button-name,link-name,label # group:wai-accname check:48","humanCommand":"Validate accessible name/description calculations for controls and widgets; review the operator-actionability evidence dimension for Accessible Name Computation"}},{"id":"ni-wai-accname-49","testId":"ni-wai-accname-49","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessible Name Computation: Degraded State","description":"Validates honest degraded, unavailable, skipped, and not-applicable states for accessible name and description consistency for interactive controls. Evidence should include status and storage evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessible Name Computation: Degraded State appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the degraded state evidence for accessible name computation, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-accname-49","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","accname","screen-reader","w3c","degraded-state","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules button-name,link-name,label # group:wai-accname check:49","humanCommand":"Validate accessible name/description calculations for controls and widgets; review the degraded-state evidence dimension for Accessible Name Computation"}},{"id":"ni-wai-accname-50","testId":"ni-wai-accname-50","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"Accessible Name Computation: Reproducibility","description":"Validates stable CLI/API/human reproduction path and deterministic rerun instructions for accessible name and description consistency for interactive controls. Evidence should include commands and registry version evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Accessible Name Computation: Reproducibility appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the reproducibility evidence for accessible name computation, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-accname-50","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","accname","screen-reader","w3c","reproducibility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --rules button-name,link-name,label # group:wai-accname check:50","humanCommand":"Validate accessible name/description calculations for controls and widgets; review the reproducibility evidence dimension for Accessible Name Computation"}},{"id":"ni-wai-apg-01","testId":"ni-wai-apg-01","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Availability","description":"Validates public route availability and successful bounded fetch behavior for widget keyboard patterns and interaction behavior consistency. Evidence should include HTTP status, timeout, and redirect evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Availability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the availability evidence for aria authoring practices, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-apg-01","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","apg","keyboard","w3c","availability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-apg check:1","humanCommand":"Validate complex widgets against ARIA Authoring Practices keyboard models; review the availability evidence dimension for ARIA Authoring Practices"}},{"id":"ni-wai-apg-02","testId":"ni-wai-apg-02","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Public Safety","description":"Validates public-safe access boundaries without exposing private or protected data for widget keyboard patterns and interaction behavior consistency. Evidence should include route policy and response-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Public Safety appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the public safety evidence for aria authoring practices, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-apg-02","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","apg","keyboard","w3c","public-safety","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-apg check:2","humanCommand":"Validate complex widgets against ARIA Authoring Practices keyboard models; review the public-safety evidence dimension for ARIA Authoring Practices"}},{"id":"ni-wai-apg-03","testId":"ni-wai-apg-03","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Canonical Url","description":"Validates canonical URL stability and normalized route identity for widget keyboard patterns and interaction behavior consistency. Evidence should include canonical tags, redirects, and normalized URL evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Canonical Url appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the canonical url evidence for aria authoring practices, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-apg-03","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","apg","keyboard","w3c","canonical-url","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-apg check:3","humanCommand":"Validate complex widgets against ARIA Authoring Practices keyboard models; review the canonical-url evidence dimension for ARIA Authoring Practices"}},{"id":"ni-wai-apg-04","testId":"ni-wai-apg-04","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Metadata Clarity","description":"Validates title, description, and page-specific metadata clarity for widget keyboard patterns and interaction behavior consistency. Evidence should include HTML metadata and extracted text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Metadata Clarity appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the metadata clarity evidence for aria authoring practices, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-apg-04","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","apg","keyboard","w3c","metadata-clarity","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-apg check:4","humanCommand":"Validate complex widgets against ARIA Authoring Practices keyboard models; review the metadata-clarity evidence dimension for ARIA Authoring Practices"}},{"id":"ni-wai-apg-05","testId":"ni-wai-apg-05","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Semantic Structure","description":"Validates semantic HTML structure for humans, agents, and assistive technology for widget keyboard patterns and interaction behavior consistency. Evidence should include heading, landmark, and element evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Semantic Structure appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the semantic structure evidence for aria authoring practices, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-apg-05","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","apg","keyboard","w3c","semantic-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-apg check:5","humanCommand":"Validate complex widgets against ARIA Authoring Practices keyboard models; review the semantic-structure evidence dimension for ARIA Authoring Practices"}},{"id":"ni-wai-apg-06","testId":"ni-wai-apg-06","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Machine Readability","description":"Validates machine-readable public content and predictable parsing surfaces for widget keyboard patterns and interaction behavior consistency. Evidence should include structured tags, JSON-LD, and document-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Machine Readability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the machine readability evidence for aria authoring practices, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-apg-06","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","apg","keyboard","w3c","machine-readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-apg check:6","humanCommand":"Validate complex widgets against ARIA Authoring Practices keyboard models; review the machine-readability evidence dimension for ARIA Authoring Practices"}},{"id":"ni-wai-apg-07","testId":"ni-wai-apg-07","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Agent Discovery","description":"Validates agent discovery hints and AI-readable policy/documentation signals for widget keyboard patterns and interaction behavior consistency. Evidence should include llms, policy, MCP, OpenAPI, or schema evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Agent Discovery appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the agent discovery evidence for aria authoring practices, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-apg-07","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","apg","keyboard","w3c","agent-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-apg check:7","humanCommand":"Validate complex widgets against ARIA Authoring Practices keyboard models; review the agent-discovery evidence dimension for ARIA Authoring Practices"}},{"id":"ni-wai-apg-08","testId":"ni-wai-apg-08","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Crawler Discovery","description":"Validates crawler discovery paths through robots, sitemap, feeds, and canonical links for widget keyboard patterns and interaction behavior consistency. Evidence should include discovery artifact and link evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Crawler Discovery appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the crawler discovery evidence for aria authoring practices, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-apg-08","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","apg","keyboard","w3c","crawler-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-apg check:8","humanCommand":"Validate complex widgets against ARIA Authoring Practices keyboard models; review the crawler-discovery evidence dimension for ARIA Authoring Practices"}},{"id":"ni-wai-apg-09","testId":"ni-wai-apg-09","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Answerability","description":"Validates direct answer extraction and quotable explanatory content for widget keyboard patterns and interaction behavior consistency. Evidence should include question, summary, heading, and paragraph evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Answerability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the answerability evidence for aria authoring practices, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-apg-09","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","apg","keyboard","w3c","answerability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-apg check:9","humanCommand":"Validate complex widgets against ARIA Authoring Practices keyboard models; review the answerability evidence dimension for ARIA Authoring Practices"}},{"id":"ni-wai-apg-10","testId":"ni-wai-apg-10","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Generative Context","description":"Validates GEO context quality for generative engines without inventing measured facts for widget keyboard patterns and interaction behavior consistency. Evidence should include entity, source, and instruction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Generative Context appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the generative context evidence for aria authoring practices, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-apg-10","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","apg","keyboard","w3c","generative-context","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-apg check:10","humanCommand":"Validate complex widgets against ARIA Authoring Practices keyboard models; review the generative-context evidence dimension for ARIA Authoring Practices"}},{"id":"ni-wai-apg-11","testId":"ni-wai-apg-11","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Search Intent","description":"Validates search intent alignment and snippet-friendly content structure for widget keyboard patterns and interaction behavior consistency. Evidence should include metadata, headings, and topical text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Search Intent appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the search intent evidence for aria authoring practices, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-apg-11","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","apg","keyboard","w3c","search-intent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-apg check:11","humanCommand":"Validate complex widgets against ARIA Authoring Practices keyboard models; review the search-intent evidence dimension for ARIA Authoring Practices"}},{"id":"ni-wai-apg-12","testId":"ni-wai-apg-12","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Accessibility Semantics","description":"Validates accessible names, relationships, landmarks, and keyboard-relevant structure for widget keyboard patterns and interaction behavior consistency. Evidence should include ARIA, labels, landmarks, and control evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Accessibility Semantics appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the accessibility semantics evidence for aria authoring practices, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-apg-12","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","apg","keyboard","w3c","accessibility-semantics","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-apg check:12","humanCommand":"Validate complex widgets against ARIA Authoring Practices keyboard models; review the accessibility-semantics evidence dimension for ARIA Authoring Practices"}},{"id":"ni-wai-apg-13","testId":"ni-wai-apg-13","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Mobile Readiness","description":"Validates mobile viewport, responsive content, and touch-friendly layout signals for widget keyboard patterns and interaction behavior consistency. Evidence should include viewport and responsive asset evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Mobile Readiness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the mobile readiness evidence for aria authoring practices, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-apg-13","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","apg","keyboard","w3c","mobile-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-apg check:13","humanCommand":"Validate complex widgets against ARIA Authoring Practices keyboard models; review the mobile-readiness evidence dimension for ARIA Authoring Practices"}},{"id":"ni-wai-apg-14","testId":"ni-wai-apg-14","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Performance Budget","description":"Validates performance budget compliance using measured or bounded deterministic inputs for widget keyboard patterns and interaction behavior consistency. Evidence should include timing, byte, and Lighthouse-derived evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Performance Budget appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the performance budget evidence for aria authoring practices, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-apg-14","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","apg","keyboard","w3c","performance-budget","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-apg check:14","humanCommand":"Validate complex widgets against ARIA Authoring Practices keyboard models; review the performance-budget evidence dimension for ARIA Authoring Practices"}},{"id":"ni-wai-apg-15","testId":"ni-wai-apg-15","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Resource Efficiency","description":"Validates resource size, script/style count, and optimization opportunity signals for widget keyboard patterns and interaction behavior consistency. Evidence should include resource and markup evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Resource Efficiency appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the resource efficiency evidence for aria authoring practices, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-apg-15","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","apg","keyboard","w3c","resource-efficiency","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-apg check:15","humanCommand":"Validate complex widgets against ARIA Authoring Practices keyboard models; review the resource-efficiency evidence dimension for ARIA Authoring Practices"}},{"id":"ni-wai-apg-16","testId":"ni-wai-apg-16","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Cache Freshness","description":"Validates cache behavior, freshness hints, and stale-content risk for widget keyboard patterns and interaction behavior consistency. Evidence should include HTTP cache and timestamp evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Cache Freshness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the cache freshness evidence for aria authoring practices, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-apg-16","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","apg","keyboard","w3c","cache-freshness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-apg check:16","humanCommand":"Validate complex widgets against ARIA Authoring Practices keyboard models; review the cache-freshness evidence dimension for ARIA Authoring Practices"}},{"id":"ni-wai-apg-17","testId":"ni-wai-apg-17","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Route Reliability","description":"Validates route reliability, redirect safety, and dead-link risk for widget keyboard patterns and interaction behavior consistency. Evidence should include status, redirect, and sitemap evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Route Reliability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the route reliability evidence for aria authoring practices, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-apg-17","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","apg","keyboard","w3c","route-reliability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-apg check:17","humanCommand":"Validate complex widgets against ARIA Authoring Practices keyboard models; review the route-reliability evidence dimension for ARIA Authoring Practices"}},{"id":"ni-wai-apg-18","testId":"ni-wai-apg-18","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Feed Quality","description":"Validates RSS/Atom/feed usefulness, parseability, and freshness for widget keyboard patterns and interaction behavior consistency. Evidence should include feed XML and item evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Feed Quality appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the feed quality evidence for aria authoring practices, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-apg-18","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","apg","keyboard","w3c","feed-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-apg check:18","humanCommand":"Validate complex widgets against ARIA Authoring Practices keyboard models; review the feed-quality evidence dimension for ARIA Authoring Practices"}},{"id":"ni-wai-apg-19","testId":"ni-wai-apg-19","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Sitemap Quality","description":"Validates sitemap validity, public-safe URL coverage, and no-dead-link policy for widget keyboard patterns and interaction behavior consistency. Evidence should include sitemap XML and bounded link-check evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Sitemap Quality appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the sitemap quality evidence for aria authoring practices, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-apg-19","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","apg","keyboard","w3c","sitemap-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-apg check:19","humanCommand":"Validate complex widgets against ARIA Authoring Practices keyboard models; review the sitemap-quality evidence dimension for ARIA Authoring Practices"}},{"id":"ni-wai-apg-20","testId":"ni-wai-apg-20","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Robots Alignment","description":"Validates robots.txt alignment with public/protected policy and sitemap discovery for widget keyboard patterns and interaction behavior consistency. Evidence should include robots directives and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Robots Alignment appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the robots alignment evidence for aria authoring practices, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-apg-20","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","apg","keyboard","w3c","robots-alignment","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-apg check:20","humanCommand":"Validate complex widgets against ARIA Authoring Practices keyboard models; review the robots-alignment evidence dimension for ARIA Authoring Practices"}},{"id":"ni-wai-apg-21","testId":"ni-wai-apg-21","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Llms Structure","description":"Validates llms.txt structure, readability, endpoint coverage, and agent usefulness for widget keyboard patterns and interaction behavior consistency. Evidence should include plain-text section and line-length evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Llms Structure appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms structure evidence for aria authoring practices, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-apg-21","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","apg","keyboard","w3c","llms-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-apg check:21","humanCommand":"Validate complex widgets against ARIA Authoring Practices keyboard models; review the llms-structure evidence dimension for ARIA Authoring Practices"}},{"id":"ni-wai-apg-22","testId":"ni-wai-apg-22","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Llms Index Schema","description":"Validates llms-index JSON schema shape and count reconciliation for widget keyboard patterns and interaction behavior consistency. Evidence should include JSON keys, counts, and endpoint evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Llms Index Schema appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms index schema evidence for aria authoring practices, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-apg-22","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","apg","keyboard","w3c","llms-index-schema","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-apg check:22","humanCommand":"Validate complex widgets against ARIA Authoring Practices keyboard models; review the llms-index-schema evidence dimension for ARIA Authoring Practices"}},{"id":"ni-wai-apg-23","testId":"ni-wai-apg-23","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Humans Attribution","description":"Validates humans.txt attribution, maintainer, technology, and governance transparency for widget keyboard patterns and interaction behavior consistency. Evidence should include humans.txt section evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Humans Attribution appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the humans attribution evidence for aria authoring practices, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-apg-23","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","apg","keyboard","w3c","humans-attribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-apg check:23","humanCommand":"Validate complex widgets against ARIA Authoring Practices keyboard models; review the humans-attribution evidence dimension for ARIA Authoring Practices"}},{"id":"ni-wai-apg-24","testId":"ni-wai-apg-24","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Agent Policy","description":"Validates agent-policy JSON clarity for allowed, disallowed, and protected operations for widget keyboard patterns and interaction behavior consistency. Evidence should include well-known policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Agent Policy appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the agent policy evidence for aria authoring practices, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-apg-24","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","apg","keyboard","w3c","agent-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-apg check:24","humanCommand":"Validate complex widgets against ARIA Authoring Practices keyboard models; review the agent-policy evidence dimension for ARIA Authoring Practices"}},{"id":"ni-wai-apg-25","testId":"ni-wai-apg-25","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Ai Policy","description":"Validates AI policy clarity for training, search, answer use, caching, and attribution for widget keyboard patterns and interaction behavior consistency. Evidence should include well-known AI policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Ai Policy appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ai policy evidence for aria authoring practices, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-apg-25","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","apg","keyboard","w3c","ai-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-apg check:25","humanCommand":"Validate complex widgets against ARIA Authoring Practices keyboard models; review the ai-policy evidence dimension for ARIA Authoring Practices"}},{"id":"ni-wai-apg-26","testId":"ni-wai-apg-26","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Trust Policy","description":"Validates trust policy coverage for privacy, traceability, metadata, and protected actions for widget keyboard patterns and interaction behavior consistency. Evidence should include trust.json evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Trust Policy appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the trust policy evidence for aria authoring practices, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-apg-26","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","apg","keyboard","w3c","trust-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-apg check:26","humanCommand":"Validate complex widgets against ARIA Authoring Practices keyboard models; review the trust-policy evidence dimension for ARIA Authoring Practices"}},{"id":"ni-wai-apg-27","testId":"ni-wai-apg-27","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Openapi Contract","description":"Validates OpenAPI availability, server URL accuracy, schemas, and auth policy for widget keyboard patterns and interaction behavior consistency. Evidence should include OpenAPI text/JSON evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Openapi Contract appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the openapi contract evidence for aria authoring practices, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-apg-27","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","apg","keyboard","w3c","openapi-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-apg check:27","humanCommand":"Validate complex widgets against ARIA Authoring Practices keyboard models; review the openapi-contract evidence dimension for ARIA Authoring Practices"}},{"id":"ni-wai-apg-28","testId":"ni-wai-apg-28","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Mcp Contract","description":"Validates MCP JSON-RPC introspection, real tools, resources, and protected boundaries for widget keyboard patterns and interaction behavior consistency. Evidence should include MCP manifest and initialize evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Mcp Contract appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the mcp contract evidence for aria authoring practices, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-apg-28","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","apg","keyboard","w3c","mcp-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-apg check:28","humanCommand":"Validate complex widgets against ARIA Authoring Practices keyboard models; review the mcp-contract evidence dimension for ARIA Authoring Practices"}},{"id":"ni-wai-apg-29","testId":"ni-wai-apg-29","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Api Error Shape","description":"Validates API success/error response shape consistency for widget keyboard patterns and interaction behavior consistency. Evidence should include REST envelope evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Api Error Shape appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the api error shape evidence for aria authoring practices, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-apg-29","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","apg","keyboard","w3c","api-error-shape","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-apg check:29","humanCommand":"Validate complex widgets against ARIA Authoring Practices keyboard models; review the api-error-shape evidence dimension for ARIA Authoring Practices"}},{"id":"ni-wai-apg-30","testId":"ni-wai-apg-30","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Traceability","description":"Validates trace propagation, request IDs, and safe observability correlation for widget keyboard patterns and interaction behavior consistency. Evidence should include trace header and metadata evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Traceability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the traceability evidence for aria authoring practices, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-apg-30","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","apg","keyboard","w3c","traceability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-apg check:30","humanCommand":"Validate complex widgets against ARIA Authoring Practices keyboard models; review the traceability evidence dimension for ARIA Authoring Practices"}},{"id":"ni-wai-apg-31","testId":"ni-wai-apg-31","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Ja4 Redaction","description":"Validates fingerprint-adjacent metadata redaction and non-public raw JA4 handling for widget keyboard patterns and interaction behavior consistency. Evidence should include metadata policy and redaction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Ja4 Redaction appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the ja4 redaction evidence for aria authoring practices, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-apg-31","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","apg","keyboard","w3c","ja4-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-apg check:31","humanCommand":"Validate complex widgets against ARIA Authoring Practices keyboard models; review the ja4-redaction evidence dimension for ARIA Authoring Practices"}},{"id":"ni-wai-apg-32","testId":"ni-wai-apg-32","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Secret Redaction","description":"Validates absence of secrets, generic key examples, cookies, and raw tokens in public outputs for widget keyboard patterns and interaction behavior consistency. Evidence should include public artifact scan evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Secret Redaction appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the secret redaction evidence for aria authoring practices, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-apg-32","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","apg","keyboard","w3c","secret-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-apg check:32","humanCommand":"Validate complex widgets against ARIA Authoring Practices keyboard models; review the secret-redaction evidence dimension for ARIA Authoring Practices"}},{"id":"ni-wai-apg-33","testId":"ni-wai-apg-33","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Security Headers","description":"Validates security header coverage and hardened transport signals for widget keyboard patterns and interaction behavior consistency. Evidence should include HTTP header evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Security Headers appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the security headers evidence for aria authoring practices, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-apg-33","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","apg","keyboard","w3c","security-headers","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-apg check:33","humanCommand":"Validate complex widgets against ARIA Authoring Practices keyboard models; review the security-headers evidence dimension for ARIA Authoring Practices"}},{"id":"ni-wai-apg-34","testId":"ni-wai-apg-34","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Privacy Consent","description":"Validates privacy policy, consent, attribution, and data-use disclosure quality for widget keyboard patterns and interaction behavior consistency. Evidence should include public page and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Privacy Consent appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the privacy consent evidence for aria authoring practices, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-apg-34","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","apg","keyboard","w3c","privacy-consent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-apg check:34","humanCommand":"Validate complex widgets against ARIA Authoring Practices keyboard models; review the privacy-consent evidence dimension for ARIA Authoring Practices"}},{"id":"ni-wai-apg-35","testId":"ni-wai-apg-35","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Structured Data","description":"Validates JSON-LD and entity modeling for machine interpretation for widget keyboard patterns and interaction behavior consistency. Evidence should include schema block and parse evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Structured Data appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the structured data evidence for aria authoring practices, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-apg-35","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","apg","keyboard","w3c","structured-data","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-apg check:35","humanCommand":"Validate complex widgets against ARIA Authoring Practices keyboard models; review the structured-data evidence dimension for ARIA Authoring Practices"}},{"id":"ni-wai-apg-36","testId":"ni-wai-apg-36","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Social Preview","description":"Validates Open Graph and Twitter/X card readiness for public sharing for widget keyboard patterns and interaction behavior consistency. Evidence should include meta tag evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Social Preview appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the social preview evidence for aria authoring practices, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-apg-36","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","apg","keyboard","w3c","social-preview","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-apg check:36","humanCommand":"Validate complex widgets against ARIA Authoring Practices keyboard models; review the social-preview evidence dimension for ARIA Authoring Practices"}},{"id":"ni-wai-apg-37","testId":"ni-wai-apg-37","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA Authoring Practices: I18n Routing","description":"Validates locale route, hreflang, language declaration, and translation readiness for widget keyboard patterns and interaction behavior consistency. Evidence should include lang/hreflang and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA Authoring Practices: I18n Routing appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the i18n routing evidence for aria authoring practices, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-apg-37","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","apg","keyboard","w3c","i18n-routing","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-apg check:37","humanCommand":"Validate complex widgets against ARIA Authoring Practices keyboard models; review the i18n-routing evidence dimension for ARIA Authoring Practices"}},{"id":"ni-wai-apg-38","testId":"ni-wai-apg-38","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Readability","description":"Validates human readability, sectioning, sentence complexity, and comprehension support for widget keyboard patterns and interaction behavior consistency. Evidence should include extracted content evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Readability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the readability evidence for aria authoring practices, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-apg-38","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","apg","keyboard","w3c","readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-apg check:38","humanCommand":"Validate complex widgets against ARIA Authoring Practices keyboard models; review the readability evidence dimension for ARIA Authoring Practices"}},{"id":"ni-wai-apg-39","testId":"ni-wai-apg-39","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Content Utility","description":"Validates non-placeholder content usefulness and domain-specific public value for widget keyboard patterns and interaction behavior consistency. Evidence should include content extraction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Content Utility appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the content utility evidence for aria authoring practices, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-apg-39","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","apg","keyboard","w3c","content-utility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-apg check:39","humanCommand":"Validate complex widgets against ARIA Authoring Practices keyboard models; review the content-utility evidence dimension for ARIA Authoring Practices"}},{"id":"ni-wai-apg-40","testId":"ni-wai-apg-40","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Recommendation Grounding","description":"Validates recommendation grounding in deterministic evidence instead of fabricated model output for widget keyboard patterns and interaction behavior consistency. Evidence should include issue and remediation evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Recommendation Grounding appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the recommendation grounding evidence for aria authoring practices, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-apg-40","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","apg","keyboard","w3c","recommendation-grounding","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-apg check:40","humanCommand":"Validate complex widgets against ARIA Authoring Practices keyboard models; review the recommendation-grounding evidence dimension for ARIA Authoring Practices"}},{"id":"ni-wai-apg-41","testId":"ni-wai-apg-41","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Evidence Quality","description":"Validates evidence completeness, public safety, and reproducibility for widget keyboard patterns and interaction behavior consistency. Evidence should include test output and artifact evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Evidence Quality appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the evidence quality evidence for aria authoring practices, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-apg-41","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","apg","keyboard","w3c","evidence-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-apg check:41","humanCommand":"Validate complex widgets against ARIA Authoring Practices keyboard models; review the evidence-quality evidence dimension for ARIA Authoring Practices"}},{"id":"ni-wai-apg-42","testId":"ni-wai-apg-42","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Threshold Policy","description":"Validates threshold clarity, pass/warn/fail semantics, and scoring transparency for widget keyboard patterns and interaction behavior consistency. Evidence should include threshold and result status evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Threshold Policy appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the threshold policy evidence for aria authoring practices, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-apg-42","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","apg","keyboard","w3c","threshold-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-apg check:42","humanCommand":"Validate complex widgets against ARIA Authoring Practices keyboard models; review the threshold-policy evidence dimension for ARIA Authoring Practices"}},{"id":"ni-wai-apg-43","testId":"ni-wai-apg-43","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Confidence","description":"Validates confidence scoring and degraded-input disclosure for widget keyboard patterns and interaction behavior consistency. Evidence should include source freshness and input availability evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Confidence appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the confidence evidence for aria authoring practices, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-apg-43","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","apg","keyboard","w3c","confidence","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-apg check:43","humanCommand":"Validate complex widgets against ARIA Authoring Practices keyboard models; review the confidence evidence dimension for ARIA Authoring Practices"}},{"id":"ni-wai-apg-44","testId":"ni-wai-apg-44","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Trend Readiness","description":"Validates historical comparability and timeline readiness for future reruns for widget keyboard patterns and interaction behavior consistency. Evidence should include analysis ID, timestamp, and persistence evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Trend Readiness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the trend readiness evidence for aria authoring practices, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-apg-44","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","apg","keyboard","w3c","trend-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-apg check:44","humanCommand":"Validate complex widgets against ARIA Authoring Practices keyboard models; review the trend-readiness evidence dimension for ARIA Authoring Practices"}},{"id":"ni-wai-apg-45","testId":"ni-wai-apg-45","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Ranking Readiness","description":"Validates ranking input completeness and profile compatibility for widget keyboard patterns and interaction behavior consistency. Evidence should include score and profile evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Ranking Readiness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ranking readiness evidence for aria authoring practices, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-apg-45","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","apg","keyboard","w3c","ranking-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-apg check:45","humanCommand":"Validate complex widgets against ARIA Authoring Practices keyboard models; review the ranking-readiness evidence dimension for ARIA Authoring Practices"}},{"id":"ni-wai-apg-46","testId":"ni-wai-apg-46","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Network Contribution","description":"Validates PlatPhorm network contribution through discovery, integrations, and standards compliance for widget keyboard patterns and interaction behavior consistency. Evidence should include network graph and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Network Contribution appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the network contribution evidence for aria authoring practices, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-apg-46","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","apg","keyboard","w3c","network-contribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-apg check:46","humanCommand":"Validate complex widgets against ARIA Authoring Practices keyboard models; review the network-contribution evidence dimension for ARIA Authoring Practices"}},{"id":"ni-wai-apg-47","testId":"ni-wai-apg-47","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Report Readiness","description":"Validates report/export categorization with public-safe evidence and protected boundaries for widget keyboard patterns and interaction behavior consistency. Evidence should include report section mapping evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Report Readiness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the report readiness evidence for aria authoring practices, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-apg-47","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","apg","keyboard","w3c","report-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-apg check:47","humanCommand":"Validate complex widgets against ARIA Authoring Practices keyboard models; review the report-readiness evidence dimension for ARIA Authoring Practices"}},{"id":"ni-wai-apg-48","testId":"ni-wai-apg-48","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Operator Actionability","description":"Validates clear remediation, owner action, difficulty, and retest path for widget keyboard patterns and interaction behavior consistency. Evidence should include fix instructions and command evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Operator Actionability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the operator actionability evidence for aria authoring practices, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-apg-48","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","apg","keyboard","w3c","operator-actionability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-apg check:48","humanCommand":"Validate complex widgets against ARIA Authoring Practices keyboard models; review the operator-actionability evidence dimension for ARIA Authoring Practices"}},{"id":"ni-wai-apg-49","testId":"ni-wai-apg-49","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Degraded State","description":"Validates honest degraded, unavailable, skipped, and not-applicable states for widget keyboard patterns and interaction behavior consistency. Evidence should include status and storage evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Degraded State appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the degraded state evidence for aria authoring practices, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-apg-49","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","apg","keyboard","w3c","degraded-state","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-apg check:49","humanCommand":"Validate complex widgets against ARIA Authoring Practices keyboard models; review the degraded-state evidence dimension for ARIA Authoring Practices"}},{"id":"ni-wai-apg-50","testId":"ni-wai-apg-50","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Reproducibility","description":"Validates stable CLI/API/human reproduction path and deterministic rerun instructions for widget keyboard patterns and interaction behavior consistency. Evidence should include commands and registry version evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ARIA Authoring Practices: Reproducibility appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the reproducibility evidence for aria authoring practices, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-apg-50","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","apg","keyboard","w3c","reproducibility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-apg check:50","humanCommand":"Validate complex widgets against ARIA Authoring Practices keyboard models; review the reproducibility evidence dimension for ARIA Authoring Practices"}},{"id":"ni-wai-atag-01","testId":"ni-wai-atag-01","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Availability","description":"Validates public route availability and successful bounded fetch behavior for authoring-tool accessibility support and accessible content production workflows. Evidence should include HTTP status, timeout, and redirect evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Availability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the availability evidence for atag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-atag-01","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","atag","authoring-tools","w3c","availability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-atag check:1","humanCommand":"Evaluate authoring and publishing workflows against ATAG 2.0 guidance; review the availability evidence dimension for ATAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-atag-02","testId":"ni-wai-atag-02","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Public Safety","description":"Validates public-safe access boundaries without exposing private or protected data for authoring-tool accessibility support and accessible content production workflows. Evidence should include route policy and response-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Public Safety appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the public safety evidence for atag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-atag-02","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","atag","authoring-tools","w3c","public-safety","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-atag check:2","humanCommand":"Evaluate authoring and publishing workflows against ATAG 2.0 guidance; review the public-safety evidence dimension for ATAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-atag-03","testId":"ni-wai-atag-03","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Canonical Url","description":"Validates canonical URL stability and normalized route identity for authoring-tool accessibility support and accessible content production workflows. Evidence should include canonical tags, redirects, and normalized URL evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Canonical Url appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the canonical url evidence for atag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-atag-03","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","atag","authoring-tools","w3c","canonical-url","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-atag check:3","humanCommand":"Evaluate authoring and publishing workflows against ATAG 2.0 guidance; review the canonical-url evidence dimension for ATAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-atag-04","testId":"ni-wai-atag-04","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Metadata Clarity","description":"Validates title, description, and page-specific metadata clarity for authoring-tool accessibility support and accessible content production workflows. Evidence should include HTML metadata and extracted text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Metadata Clarity appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the metadata clarity evidence for atag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-atag-04","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","atag","authoring-tools","w3c","metadata-clarity","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-atag check:4","humanCommand":"Evaluate authoring and publishing workflows against ATAG 2.0 guidance; review the metadata-clarity evidence dimension for ATAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-atag-05","testId":"ni-wai-atag-05","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Semantic Structure","description":"Validates semantic HTML structure for humans, agents, and assistive technology for authoring-tool accessibility support and accessible content production workflows. Evidence should include heading, landmark, and element evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Semantic Structure appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the semantic structure evidence for atag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-atag-05","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","atag","authoring-tools","w3c","semantic-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-atag check:5","humanCommand":"Evaluate authoring and publishing workflows against ATAG 2.0 guidance; review the semantic-structure evidence dimension for ATAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-atag-06","testId":"ni-wai-atag-06","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Machine Readability","description":"Validates machine-readable public content and predictable parsing surfaces for authoring-tool accessibility support and accessible content production workflows. Evidence should include structured tags, JSON-LD, and document-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Machine Readability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the machine readability evidence for atag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-atag-06","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","atag","authoring-tools","w3c","machine-readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-atag check:6","humanCommand":"Evaluate authoring and publishing workflows against ATAG 2.0 guidance; review the machine-readability evidence dimension for ATAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-atag-07","testId":"ni-wai-atag-07","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Agent Discovery","description":"Validates agent discovery hints and AI-readable policy/documentation signals for authoring-tool accessibility support and accessible content production workflows. Evidence should include llms, policy, MCP, OpenAPI, or schema evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Agent Discovery appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the agent discovery evidence for atag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-atag-07","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","atag","authoring-tools","w3c","agent-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-atag check:7","humanCommand":"Evaluate authoring and publishing workflows against ATAG 2.0 guidance; review the agent-discovery evidence dimension for ATAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-atag-08","testId":"ni-wai-atag-08","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Crawler Discovery","description":"Validates crawler discovery paths through robots, sitemap, feeds, and canonical links for authoring-tool accessibility support and accessible content production workflows. Evidence should include discovery artifact and link evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Crawler Discovery appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the crawler discovery evidence for atag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-atag-08","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","atag","authoring-tools","w3c","crawler-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-atag check:8","humanCommand":"Evaluate authoring and publishing workflows against ATAG 2.0 guidance; review the crawler-discovery evidence dimension for ATAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-atag-09","testId":"ni-wai-atag-09","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Answerability","description":"Validates direct answer extraction and quotable explanatory content for authoring-tool accessibility support and accessible content production workflows. Evidence should include question, summary, heading, and paragraph evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Answerability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the answerability evidence for atag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-atag-09","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","atag","authoring-tools","w3c","answerability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-atag check:9","humanCommand":"Evaluate authoring and publishing workflows against ATAG 2.0 guidance; review the answerability evidence dimension for ATAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-atag-10","testId":"ni-wai-atag-10","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Generative Context","description":"Validates GEO context quality for generative engines without inventing measured facts for authoring-tool accessibility support and accessible content production workflows. Evidence should include entity, source, and instruction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Generative Context appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the generative context evidence for atag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-atag-10","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","atag","authoring-tools","w3c","generative-context","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-atag check:10","humanCommand":"Evaluate authoring and publishing workflows against ATAG 2.0 guidance; review the generative-context evidence dimension for ATAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-atag-11","testId":"ni-wai-atag-11","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Search Intent","description":"Validates search intent alignment and snippet-friendly content structure for authoring-tool accessibility support and accessible content production workflows. Evidence should include metadata, headings, and topical text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Search Intent appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the search intent evidence for atag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-atag-11","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","atag","authoring-tools","w3c","search-intent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-atag check:11","humanCommand":"Evaluate authoring and publishing workflows against ATAG 2.0 guidance; review the search-intent evidence dimension for ATAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-atag-12","testId":"ni-wai-atag-12","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Accessibility Semantics","description":"Validates accessible names, relationships, landmarks, and keyboard-relevant structure for authoring-tool accessibility support and accessible content production workflows. Evidence should include ARIA, labels, landmarks, and control evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Accessibility Semantics appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the accessibility semantics evidence for atag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-atag-12","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","atag","authoring-tools","w3c","accessibility-semantics","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-atag check:12","humanCommand":"Evaluate authoring and publishing workflows against ATAG 2.0 guidance; review the accessibility-semantics evidence dimension for ATAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-atag-13","testId":"ni-wai-atag-13","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Mobile Readiness","description":"Validates mobile viewport, responsive content, and touch-friendly layout signals for authoring-tool accessibility support and accessible content production workflows. Evidence should include viewport and responsive asset evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Mobile Readiness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the mobile readiness evidence for atag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-atag-13","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","atag","authoring-tools","w3c","mobile-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-atag check:13","humanCommand":"Evaluate authoring and publishing workflows against ATAG 2.0 guidance; review the mobile-readiness evidence dimension for ATAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-atag-14","testId":"ni-wai-atag-14","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Performance Budget","description":"Validates performance budget compliance using measured or bounded deterministic inputs for authoring-tool accessibility support and accessible content production workflows. Evidence should include timing, byte, and Lighthouse-derived evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Performance Budget appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the performance budget evidence for atag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-atag-14","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","atag","authoring-tools","w3c","performance-budget","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-atag check:14","humanCommand":"Evaluate authoring and publishing workflows against ATAG 2.0 guidance; review the performance-budget evidence dimension for ATAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-atag-15","testId":"ni-wai-atag-15","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Resource Efficiency","description":"Validates resource size, script/style count, and optimization opportunity signals for authoring-tool accessibility support and accessible content production workflows. Evidence should include resource and markup evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Resource Efficiency appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the resource efficiency evidence for atag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-atag-15","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","atag","authoring-tools","w3c","resource-efficiency","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-atag check:15","humanCommand":"Evaluate authoring and publishing workflows against ATAG 2.0 guidance; review the resource-efficiency evidence dimension for ATAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-atag-16","testId":"ni-wai-atag-16","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Cache Freshness","description":"Validates cache behavior, freshness hints, and stale-content risk for authoring-tool accessibility support and accessible content production workflows. Evidence should include HTTP cache and timestamp evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Cache Freshness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the cache freshness evidence for atag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-atag-16","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","atag","authoring-tools","w3c","cache-freshness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-atag check:16","humanCommand":"Evaluate authoring and publishing workflows against ATAG 2.0 guidance; review the cache-freshness evidence dimension for ATAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-atag-17","testId":"ni-wai-atag-17","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Route Reliability","description":"Validates route reliability, redirect safety, and dead-link risk for authoring-tool accessibility support and accessible content production workflows. Evidence should include status, redirect, and sitemap evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Route Reliability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the route reliability evidence for atag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-atag-17","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","atag","authoring-tools","w3c","route-reliability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-atag check:17","humanCommand":"Evaluate authoring and publishing workflows against ATAG 2.0 guidance; review the route-reliability evidence dimension for ATAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-atag-18","testId":"ni-wai-atag-18","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Feed Quality","description":"Validates RSS/Atom/feed usefulness, parseability, and freshness for authoring-tool accessibility support and accessible content production workflows. Evidence should include feed XML and item evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Feed Quality appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the feed quality evidence for atag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-atag-18","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","atag","authoring-tools","w3c","feed-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-atag check:18","humanCommand":"Evaluate authoring and publishing workflows against ATAG 2.0 guidance; review the feed-quality evidence dimension for ATAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-atag-19","testId":"ni-wai-atag-19","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Sitemap Quality","description":"Validates sitemap validity, public-safe URL coverage, and no-dead-link policy for authoring-tool accessibility support and accessible content production workflows. Evidence should include sitemap XML and bounded link-check evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Sitemap Quality appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the sitemap quality evidence for atag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-atag-19","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","atag","authoring-tools","w3c","sitemap-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-atag check:19","humanCommand":"Evaluate authoring and publishing workflows against ATAG 2.0 guidance; review the sitemap-quality evidence dimension for ATAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-atag-20","testId":"ni-wai-atag-20","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Robots Alignment","description":"Validates robots.txt alignment with public/protected policy and sitemap discovery for authoring-tool accessibility support and accessible content production workflows. Evidence should include robots directives and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Robots Alignment appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the robots alignment evidence for atag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-atag-20","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","atag","authoring-tools","w3c","robots-alignment","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-atag check:20","humanCommand":"Evaluate authoring and publishing workflows against ATAG 2.0 guidance; review the robots-alignment evidence dimension for ATAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-atag-21","testId":"ni-wai-atag-21","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Llms Structure","description":"Validates llms.txt structure, readability, endpoint coverage, and agent usefulness for authoring-tool accessibility support and accessible content production workflows. Evidence should include plain-text section and line-length evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Llms Structure appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms structure evidence for atag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-atag-21","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","atag","authoring-tools","w3c","llms-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-atag check:21","humanCommand":"Evaluate authoring and publishing workflows against ATAG 2.0 guidance; review the llms-structure evidence dimension for ATAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-atag-22","testId":"ni-wai-atag-22","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Llms Index Schema","description":"Validates llms-index JSON schema shape and count reconciliation for authoring-tool accessibility support and accessible content production workflows. Evidence should include JSON keys, counts, and endpoint evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Llms Index Schema appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms index schema evidence for atag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-atag-22","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","atag","authoring-tools","w3c","llms-index-schema","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-atag check:22","humanCommand":"Evaluate authoring and publishing workflows against ATAG 2.0 guidance; review the llms-index-schema evidence dimension for ATAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-atag-23","testId":"ni-wai-atag-23","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Humans Attribution","description":"Validates humans.txt attribution, maintainer, technology, and governance transparency for authoring-tool accessibility support and accessible content production workflows. Evidence should include humans.txt section evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Humans Attribution appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the humans attribution evidence for atag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-atag-23","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","atag","authoring-tools","w3c","humans-attribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-atag check:23","humanCommand":"Evaluate authoring and publishing workflows against ATAG 2.0 guidance; review the humans-attribution evidence dimension for ATAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-atag-24","testId":"ni-wai-atag-24","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Agent Policy","description":"Validates agent-policy JSON clarity for allowed, disallowed, and protected operations for authoring-tool accessibility support and accessible content production workflows. Evidence should include well-known policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Agent Policy appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the agent policy evidence for atag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-atag-24","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","atag","authoring-tools","w3c","agent-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-atag check:24","humanCommand":"Evaluate authoring and publishing workflows against ATAG 2.0 guidance; review the agent-policy evidence dimension for ATAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-atag-25","testId":"ni-wai-atag-25","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Ai Policy","description":"Validates AI policy clarity for training, search, answer use, caching, and attribution for authoring-tool accessibility support and accessible content production workflows. Evidence should include well-known AI policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Ai Policy appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ai policy evidence for atag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-atag-25","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","atag","authoring-tools","w3c","ai-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-atag check:25","humanCommand":"Evaluate authoring and publishing workflows against ATAG 2.0 guidance; review the ai-policy evidence dimension for ATAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-atag-26","testId":"ni-wai-atag-26","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Trust Policy","description":"Validates trust policy coverage for privacy, traceability, metadata, and protected actions for authoring-tool accessibility support and accessible content production workflows. Evidence should include trust.json evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Trust Policy appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the trust policy evidence for atag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-atag-26","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","atag","authoring-tools","w3c","trust-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-atag check:26","humanCommand":"Evaluate authoring and publishing workflows against ATAG 2.0 guidance; review the trust-policy evidence dimension for ATAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-atag-27","testId":"ni-wai-atag-27","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Openapi Contract","description":"Validates OpenAPI availability, server URL accuracy, schemas, and auth policy for authoring-tool accessibility support and accessible content production workflows. Evidence should include OpenAPI text/JSON evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Openapi Contract appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the openapi contract evidence for atag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-atag-27","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","atag","authoring-tools","w3c","openapi-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-atag check:27","humanCommand":"Evaluate authoring and publishing workflows against ATAG 2.0 guidance; review the openapi-contract evidence dimension for ATAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-atag-28","testId":"ni-wai-atag-28","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Mcp Contract","description":"Validates MCP JSON-RPC introspection, real tools, resources, and protected boundaries for authoring-tool accessibility support and accessible content production workflows. Evidence should include MCP manifest and initialize evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Mcp Contract appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the mcp contract evidence for atag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-atag-28","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","atag","authoring-tools","w3c","mcp-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-atag check:28","humanCommand":"Evaluate authoring and publishing workflows against ATAG 2.0 guidance; review the mcp-contract evidence dimension for ATAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-atag-29","testId":"ni-wai-atag-29","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Api Error Shape","description":"Validates API success/error response shape consistency for authoring-tool accessibility support and accessible content production workflows. Evidence should include REST envelope evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Api Error Shape appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the api error shape evidence for atag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-atag-29","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","atag","authoring-tools","w3c","api-error-shape","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-atag check:29","humanCommand":"Evaluate authoring and publishing workflows against ATAG 2.0 guidance; review the api-error-shape evidence dimension for ATAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-atag-30","testId":"ni-wai-atag-30","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Traceability","description":"Validates trace propagation, request IDs, and safe observability correlation for authoring-tool accessibility support and accessible content production workflows. Evidence should include trace header and metadata evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Traceability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the traceability evidence for atag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-atag-30","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","atag","authoring-tools","w3c","traceability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-atag check:30","humanCommand":"Evaluate authoring and publishing workflows against ATAG 2.0 guidance; review the traceability evidence dimension for ATAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-atag-31","testId":"ni-wai-atag-31","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Ja4 Redaction","description":"Validates fingerprint-adjacent metadata redaction and non-public raw JA4 handling for authoring-tool accessibility support and accessible content production workflows. Evidence should include metadata policy and redaction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Ja4 Redaction appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the ja4 redaction evidence for atag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-atag-31","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","atag","authoring-tools","w3c","ja4-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-atag check:31","humanCommand":"Evaluate authoring and publishing workflows against ATAG 2.0 guidance; review the ja4-redaction evidence dimension for ATAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-atag-32","testId":"ni-wai-atag-32","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Secret Redaction","description":"Validates absence of secrets, generic key examples, cookies, and raw tokens in public outputs for authoring-tool accessibility support and accessible content production workflows. Evidence should include public artifact scan evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Secret Redaction appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the secret redaction evidence for atag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-atag-32","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","atag","authoring-tools","w3c","secret-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-atag check:32","humanCommand":"Evaluate authoring and publishing workflows against ATAG 2.0 guidance; review the secret-redaction evidence dimension for ATAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-atag-33","testId":"ni-wai-atag-33","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Security Headers","description":"Validates security header coverage and hardened transport signals for authoring-tool accessibility support and accessible content production workflows. Evidence should include HTTP header evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Security Headers appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the security headers evidence for atag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-atag-33","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","atag","authoring-tools","w3c","security-headers","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-atag check:33","humanCommand":"Evaluate authoring and publishing workflows against ATAG 2.0 guidance; review the security-headers evidence dimension for ATAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-atag-34","testId":"ni-wai-atag-34","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Privacy Consent","description":"Validates privacy policy, consent, attribution, and data-use disclosure quality for authoring-tool accessibility support and accessible content production workflows. Evidence should include public page and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Privacy Consent appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the privacy consent evidence for atag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-atag-34","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","atag","authoring-tools","w3c","privacy-consent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-atag check:34","humanCommand":"Evaluate authoring and publishing workflows against ATAG 2.0 guidance; review the privacy-consent evidence dimension for ATAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-atag-35","testId":"ni-wai-atag-35","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Structured Data","description":"Validates JSON-LD and entity modeling for machine interpretation for authoring-tool accessibility support and accessible content production workflows. Evidence should include schema block and parse evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Structured Data appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the structured data evidence for atag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-atag-35","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","atag","authoring-tools","w3c","structured-data","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-atag check:35","humanCommand":"Evaluate authoring and publishing workflows against ATAG 2.0 guidance; review the structured-data evidence dimension for ATAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-atag-36","testId":"ni-wai-atag-36","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Social Preview","description":"Validates Open Graph and Twitter/X card readiness for public sharing for authoring-tool accessibility support and accessible content production workflows. Evidence should include meta tag evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Social Preview appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the social preview evidence for atag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-atag-36","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","atag","authoring-tools","w3c","social-preview","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-atag check:36","humanCommand":"Evaluate authoring and publishing workflows against ATAG 2.0 guidance; review the social-preview evidence dimension for ATAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-atag-37","testId":"ni-wai-atag-37","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: I18n Routing","description":"Validates locale route, hreflang, language declaration, and translation readiness for authoring-tool accessibility support and accessible content production workflows. Evidence should include lang/hreflang and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: I18n Routing appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the i18n routing evidence for atag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-atag-37","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","atag","authoring-tools","w3c","i18n-routing","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-atag check:37","humanCommand":"Evaluate authoring and publishing workflows against ATAG 2.0 guidance; review the i18n-routing evidence dimension for ATAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-atag-38","testId":"ni-wai-atag-38","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Readability","description":"Validates human readability, sectioning, sentence complexity, and comprehension support for authoring-tool accessibility support and accessible content production workflows. Evidence should include extracted content evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Readability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the readability evidence for atag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-atag-38","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","atag","authoring-tools","w3c","readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-atag check:38","humanCommand":"Evaluate authoring and publishing workflows against ATAG 2.0 guidance; review the readability evidence dimension for ATAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-atag-39","testId":"ni-wai-atag-39","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Content Utility","description":"Validates non-placeholder content usefulness and domain-specific public value for authoring-tool accessibility support and accessible content production workflows. Evidence should include content extraction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Content Utility appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the content utility evidence for atag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-atag-39","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","atag","authoring-tools","w3c","content-utility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-atag check:39","humanCommand":"Evaluate authoring and publishing workflows against ATAG 2.0 guidance; review the content-utility evidence dimension for ATAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-atag-40","testId":"ni-wai-atag-40","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Recommendation Grounding","description":"Validates recommendation grounding in deterministic evidence instead of fabricated model output for authoring-tool accessibility support and accessible content production workflows. Evidence should include issue and remediation evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Recommendation Grounding appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the recommendation grounding evidence for atag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-atag-40","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","atag","authoring-tools","w3c","recommendation-grounding","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-atag check:40","humanCommand":"Evaluate authoring and publishing workflows against ATAG 2.0 guidance; review the recommendation-grounding evidence dimension for ATAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-atag-41","testId":"ni-wai-atag-41","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Evidence Quality","description":"Validates evidence completeness, public safety, and reproducibility for authoring-tool accessibility support and accessible content production workflows. Evidence should include test output and artifact evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Evidence Quality appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the evidence quality evidence for atag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-atag-41","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","atag","authoring-tools","w3c","evidence-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-atag check:41","humanCommand":"Evaluate authoring and publishing workflows against ATAG 2.0 guidance; review the evidence-quality evidence dimension for ATAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-atag-42","testId":"ni-wai-atag-42","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Threshold Policy","description":"Validates threshold clarity, pass/warn/fail semantics, and scoring transparency for authoring-tool accessibility support and accessible content production workflows. Evidence should include threshold and result status evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Threshold Policy appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the threshold policy evidence for atag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-atag-42","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","atag","authoring-tools","w3c","threshold-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-atag check:42","humanCommand":"Evaluate authoring and publishing workflows against ATAG 2.0 guidance; review the threshold-policy evidence dimension for ATAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-atag-43","testId":"ni-wai-atag-43","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Confidence","description":"Validates confidence scoring and degraded-input disclosure for authoring-tool accessibility support and accessible content production workflows. Evidence should include source freshness and input availability evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Confidence appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the confidence evidence for atag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-atag-43","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","atag","authoring-tools","w3c","confidence","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-atag check:43","humanCommand":"Evaluate authoring and publishing workflows against ATAG 2.0 guidance; review the confidence evidence dimension for ATAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-atag-44","testId":"ni-wai-atag-44","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Trend Readiness","description":"Validates historical comparability and timeline readiness for future reruns for authoring-tool accessibility support and accessible content production workflows. Evidence should include analysis ID, timestamp, and persistence evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Trend Readiness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the trend readiness evidence for atag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-atag-44","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","atag","authoring-tools","w3c","trend-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-atag check:44","humanCommand":"Evaluate authoring and publishing workflows against ATAG 2.0 guidance; review the trend-readiness evidence dimension for ATAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-atag-45","testId":"ni-wai-atag-45","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Ranking Readiness","description":"Validates ranking input completeness and profile compatibility for authoring-tool accessibility support and accessible content production workflows. Evidence should include score and profile evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Ranking Readiness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ranking readiness evidence for atag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-atag-45","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","atag","authoring-tools","w3c","ranking-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-atag check:45","humanCommand":"Evaluate authoring and publishing workflows against ATAG 2.0 guidance; review the ranking-readiness evidence dimension for ATAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-atag-46","testId":"ni-wai-atag-46","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Network Contribution","description":"Validates PlatPhorm network contribution through discovery, integrations, and standards compliance for authoring-tool accessibility support and accessible content production workflows. Evidence should include network graph and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Network Contribution appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the network contribution evidence for atag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-atag-46","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","atag","authoring-tools","w3c","network-contribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-atag check:46","humanCommand":"Evaluate authoring and publishing workflows against ATAG 2.0 guidance; review the network-contribution evidence dimension for ATAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-atag-47","testId":"ni-wai-atag-47","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Report Readiness","description":"Validates report/export categorization with public-safe evidence and protected boundaries for authoring-tool accessibility support and accessible content production workflows. Evidence should include report section mapping evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Report Readiness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the report readiness evidence for atag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-atag-47","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","atag","authoring-tools","w3c","report-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-atag check:47","humanCommand":"Evaluate authoring and publishing workflows against ATAG 2.0 guidance; review the report-readiness evidence dimension for ATAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-atag-48","testId":"ni-wai-atag-48","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Operator Actionability","description":"Validates clear remediation, owner action, difficulty, and retest path for authoring-tool accessibility support and accessible content production workflows. Evidence should include fix instructions and command evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Operator Actionability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the operator actionability evidence for atag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-atag-48","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","atag","authoring-tools","w3c","operator-actionability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-atag check:48","humanCommand":"Evaluate authoring and publishing workflows against ATAG 2.0 guidance; review the operator-actionability evidence dimension for ATAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-atag-49","testId":"ni-wai-atag-49","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Degraded State","description":"Validates honest degraded, unavailable, skipped, and not-applicable states for authoring-tool accessibility support and accessible content production workflows. Evidence should include status and storage evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Degraded State appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the degraded state evidence for atag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-atag-49","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","atag","authoring-tools","w3c","degraded-state","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-atag check:49","humanCommand":"Evaluate authoring and publishing workflows against ATAG 2.0 guidance; review the degraded-state evidence dimension for ATAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-atag-50","testId":"ni-wai-atag-50","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Reproducibility","description":"Validates stable CLI/API/human reproduction path and deterministic rerun instructions for authoring-tool accessibility support and accessible content production workflows. Evidence should include commands and registry version evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"ATAG 2.0 Alignment: Reproducibility appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the reproducibility evidence for atag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-atag-50","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","atag","authoring-tools","w3c","reproducibility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-atag check:50","humanCommand":"Evaluate authoring and publishing workflows against ATAG 2.0 guidance; review the reproducibility evidence dimension for ATAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-uaag-01","testId":"ni-wai-uaag-01","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Availability","description":"Validates public route availability and successful bounded fetch behavior for user-agent accessibility behaviors, preferences, and assistive interoperability. Evidence should include HTTP status, timeout, and redirect evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Availability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the availability evidence for uaag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-uaag-01","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","uaag","user-agent","w3c","availability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-uaag check:1","humanCommand":"Assess agent/browser behavior consistency with UAAG 2.0 guidance; review the availability evidence dimension for UAAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-uaag-02","testId":"ni-wai-uaag-02","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Public Safety","description":"Validates public-safe access boundaries without exposing private or protected data for user-agent accessibility behaviors, preferences, and assistive interoperability. Evidence should include route policy and response-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Public Safety appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the public safety evidence for uaag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-uaag-02","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","uaag","user-agent","w3c","public-safety","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-uaag check:2","humanCommand":"Assess agent/browser behavior consistency with UAAG 2.0 guidance; review the public-safety evidence dimension for UAAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-uaag-03","testId":"ni-wai-uaag-03","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Canonical Url","description":"Validates canonical URL stability and normalized route identity for user-agent accessibility behaviors, preferences, and assistive interoperability. Evidence should include canonical tags, redirects, and normalized URL evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Canonical Url appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the canonical url evidence for uaag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-uaag-03","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","uaag","user-agent","w3c","canonical-url","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-uaag check:3","humanCommand":"Assess agent/browser behavior consistency with UAAG 2.0 guidance; review the canonical-url evidence dimension for UAAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-uaag-04","testId":"ni-wai-uaag-04","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Metadata Clarity","description":"Validates title, description, and page-specific metadata clarity for user-agent accessibility behaviors, preferences, and assistive interoperability. Evidence should include HTML metadata and extracted text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Metadata Clarity appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the metadata clarity evidence for uaag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-uaag-04","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","uaag","user-agent","w3c","metadata-clarity","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-uaag check:4","humanCommand":"Assess agent/browser behavior consistency with UAAG 2.0 guidance; review the metadata-clarity evidence dimension for UAAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-uaag-05","testId":"ni-wai-uaag-05","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Semantic Structure","description":"Validates semantic HTML structure for humans, agents, and assistive technology for user-agent accessibility behaviors, preferences, and assistive interoperability. Evidence should include heading, landmark, and element evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Semantic Structure appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the semantic structure evidence for uaag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-uaag-05","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","uaag","user-agent","w3c","semantic-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-uaag check:5","humanCommand":"Assess agent/browser behavior consistency with UAAG 2.0 guidance; review the semantic-structure evidence dimension for UAAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-uaag-06","testId":"ni-wai-uaag-06","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Machine Readability","description":"Validates machine-readable public content and predictable parsing surfaces for user-agent accessibility behaviors, preferences, and assistive interoperability. Evidence should include structured tags, JSON-LD, and document-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Machine Readability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the machine readability evidence for uaag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-uaag-06","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","uaag","user-agent","w3c","machine-readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-uaag check:6","humanCommand":"Assess agent/browser behavior consistency with UAAG 2.0 guidance; review the machine-readability evidence dimension for UAAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-uaag-07","testId":"ni-wai-uaag-07","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Agent Discovery","description":"Validates agent discovery hints and AI-readable policy/documentation signals for user-agent accessibility behaviors, preferences, and assistive interoperability. Evidence should include llms, policy, MCP, OpenAPI, or schema evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Agent Discovery appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the agent discovery evidence for uaag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-uaag-07","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","uaag","user-agent","w3c","agent-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-uaag check:7","humanCommand":"Assess agent/browser behavior consistency with UAAG 2.0 guidance; review the agent-discovery evidence dimension for UAAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-uaag-08","testId":"ni-wai-uaag-08","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Crawler Discovery","description":"Validates crawler discovery paths through robots, sitemap, feeds, and canonical links for user-agent accessibility behaviors, preferences, and assistive interoperability. Evidence should include discovery artifact and link evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Crawler Discovery appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the crawler discovery evidence for uaag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-uaag-08","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","uaag","user-agent","w3c","crawler-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-uaag check:8","humanCommand":"Assess agent/browser behavior consistency with UAAG 2.0 guidance; review the crawler-discovery evidence dimension for UAAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-uaag-09","testId":"ni-wai-uaag-09","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Answerability","description":"Validates direct answer extraction and quotable explanatory content for user-agent accessibility behaviors, preferences, and assistive interoperability. Evidence should include question, summary, heading, and paragraph evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Answerability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the answerability evidence for uaag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-uaag-09","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","uaag","user-agent","w3c","answerability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-uaag check:9","humanCommand":"Assess agent/browser behavior consistency with UAAG 2.0 guidance; review the answerability evidence dimension for UAAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-uaag-10","testId":"ni-wai-uaag-10","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Generative Context","description":"Validates GEO context quality for generative engines without inventing measured facts for user-agent accessibility behaviors, preferences, and assistive interoperability. Evidence should include entity, source, and instruction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Generative Context appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the generative context evidence for uaag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-uaag-10","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","uaag","user-agent","w3c","generative-context","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-uaag check:10","humanCommand":"Assess agent/browser behavior consistency with UAAG 2.0 guidance; review the generative-context evidence dimension for UAAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-uaag-11","testId":"ni-wai-uaag-11","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Search Intent","description":"Validates search intent alignment and snippet-friendly content structure for user-agent accessibility behaviors, preferences, and assistive interoperability. Evidence should include metadata, headings, and topical text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Search Intent appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the search intent evidence for uaag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-uaag-11","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","uaag","user-agent","w3c","search-intent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-uaag check:11","humanCommand":"Assess agent/browser behavior consistency with UAAG 2.0 guidance; review the search-intent evidence dimension for UAAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-uaag-12","testId":"ni-wai-uaag-12","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Accessibility Semantics","description":"Validates accessible names, relationships, landmarks, and keyboard-relevant structure for user-agent accessibility behaviors, preferences, and assistive interoperability. Evidence should include ARIA, labels, landmarks, and control evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Accessibility Semantics appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the accessibility semantics evidence for uaag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-uaag-12","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","uaag","user-agent","w3c","accessibility-semantics","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-uaag check:12","humanCommand":"Assess agent/browser behavior consistency with UAAG 2.0 guidance; review the accessibility-semantics evidence dimension for UAAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-uaag-13","testId":"ni-wai-uaag-13","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Mobile Readiness","description":"Validates mobile viewport, responsive content, and touch-friendly layout signals for user-agent accessibility behaviors, preferences, and assistive interoperability. Evidence should include viewport and responsive asset evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Mobile Readiness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the mobile readiness evidence for uaag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-uaag-13","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","uaag","user-agent","w3c","mobile-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-uaag check:13","humanCommand":"Assess agent/browser behavior consistency with UAAG 2.0 guidance; review the mobile-readiness evidence dimension for UAAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-uaag-14","testId":"ni-wai-uaag-14","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Performance Budget","description":"Validates performance budget compliance using measured or bounded deterministic inputs for user-agent accessibility behaviors, preferences, and assistive interoperability. Evidence should include timing, byte, and Lighthouse-derived evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Performance Budget appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the performance budget evidence for uaag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-uaag-14","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","uaag","user-agent","w3c","performance-budget","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-uaag check:14","humanCommand":"Assess agent/browser behavior consistency with UAAG 2.0 guidance; review the performance-budget evidence dimension for UAAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-uaag-15","testId":"ni-wai-uaag-15","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Resource Efficiency","description":"Validates resource size, script/style count, and optimization opportunity signals for user-agent accessibility behaviors, preferences, and assistive interoperability. Evidence should include resource and markup evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Resource Efficiency appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the resource efficiency evidence for uaag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-uaag-15","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","uaag","user-agent","w3c","resource-efficiency","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-uaag check:15","humanCommand":"Assess agent/browser behavior consistency with UAAG 2.0 guidance; review the resource-efficiency evidence dimension for UAAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-uaag-16","testId":"ni-wai-uaag-16","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Cache Freshness","description":"Validates cache behavior, freshness hints, and stale-content risk for user-agent accessibility behaviors, preferences, and assistive interoperability. Evidence should include HTTP cache and timestamp evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Cache Freshness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the cache freshness evidence for uaag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-uaag-16","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","uaag","user-agent","w3c","cache-freshness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-uaag check:16","humanCommand":"Assess agent/browser behavior consistency with UAAG 2.0 guidance; review the cache-freshness evidence dimension for UAAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-uaag-17","testId":"ni-wai-uaag-17","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Route Reliability","description":"Validates route reliability, redirect safety, and dead-link risk for user-agent accessibility behaviors, preferences, and assistive interoperability. Evidence should include status, redirect, and sitemap evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Route Reliability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the route reliability evidence for uaag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-uaag-17","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","uaag","user-agent","w3c","route-reliability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-uaag check:17","humanCommand":"Assess agent/browser behavior consistency with UAAG 2.0 guidance; review the route-reliability evidence dimension for UAAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-uaag-18","testId":"ni-wai-uaag-18","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Feed Quality","description":"Validates RSS/Atom/feed usefulness, parseability, and freshness for user-agent accessibility behaviors, preferences, and assistive interoperability. Evidence should include feed XML and item evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Feed Quality appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the feed quality evidence for uaag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-uaag-18","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","uaag","user-agent","w3c","feed-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-uaag check:18","humanCommand":"Assess agent/browser behavior consistency with UAAG 2.0 guidance; review the feed-quality evidence dimension for UAAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-uaag-19","testId":"ni-wai-uaag-19","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Sitemap Quality","description":"Validates sitemap validity, public-safe URL coverage, and no-dead-link policy for user-agent accessibility behaviors, preferences, and assistive interoperability. Evidence should include sitemap XML and bounded link-check evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Sitemap Quality appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the sitemap quality evidence for uaag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-uaag-19","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","uaag","user-agent","w3c","sitemap-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-uaag check:19","humanCommand":"Assess agent/browser behavior consistency with UAAG 2.0 guidance; review the sitemap-quality evidence dimension for UAAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-uaag-20","testId":"ni-wai-uaag-20","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Robots Alignment","description":"Validates robots.txt alignment with public/protected policy and sitemap discovery for user-agent accessibility behaviors, preferences, and assistive interoperability. Evidence should include robots directives and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Robots Alignment appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the robots alignment evidence for uaag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-uaag-20","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","uaag","user-agent","w3c","robots-alignment","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-uaag check:20","humanCommand":"Assess agent/browser behavior consistency with UAAG 2.0 guidance; review the robots-alignment evidence dimension for UAAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-uaag-21","testId":"ni-wai-uaag-21","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Llms Structure","description":"Validates llms.txt structure, readability, endpoint coverage, and agent usefulness for user-agent accessibility behaviors, preferences, and assistive interoperability. Evidence should include plain-text section and line-length evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Llms Structure appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms structure evidence for uaag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-uaag-21","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","uaag","user-agent","w3c","llms-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-uaag check:21","humanCommand":"Assess agent/browser behavior consistency with UAAG 2.0 guidance; review the llms-structure evidence dimension for UAAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-uaag-22","testId":"ni-wai-uaag-22","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Llms Index Schema","description":"Validates llms-index JSON schema shape and count reconciliation for user-agent accessibility behaviors, preferences, and assistive interoperability. Evidence should include JSON keys, counts, and endpoint evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Llms Index Schema appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms index schema evidence for uaag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-uaag-22","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","uaag","user-agent","w3c","llms-index-schema","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-uaag check:22","humanCommand":"Assess agent/browser behavior consistency with UAAG 2.0 guidance; review the llms-index-schema evidence dimension for UAAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-uaag-23","testId":"ni-wai-uaag-23","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Humans Attribution","description":"Validates humans.txt attribution, maintainer, technology, and governance transparency for user-agent accessibility behaviors, preferences, and assistive interoperability. Evidence should include humans.txt section evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Humans Attribution appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the humans attribution evidence for uaag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-uaag-23","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","uaag","user-agent","w3c","humans-attribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-uaag check:23","humanCommand":"Assess agent/browser behavior consistency with UAAG 2.0 guidance; review the humans-attribution evidence dimension for UAAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-uaag-24","testId":"ni-wai-uaag-24","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Agent Policy","description":"Validates agent-policy JSON clarity for allowed, disallowed, and protected operations for user-agent accessibility behaviors, preferences, and assistive interoperability. Evidence should include well-known policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Agent Policy appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the agent policy evidence for uaag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-uaag-24","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","uaag","user-agent","w3c","agent-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-uaag check:24","humanCommand":"Assess agent/browser behavior consistency with UAAG 2.0 guidance; review the agent-policy evidence dimension for UAAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-uaag-25","testId":"ni-wai-uaag-25","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Ai Policy","description":"Validates AI policy clarity for training, search, answer use, caching, and attribution for user-agent accessibility behaviors, preferences, and assistive interoperability. Evidence should include well-known AI policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Ai Policy appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ai policy evidence for uaag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-uaag-25","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","uaag","user-agent","w3c","ai-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-uaag check:25","humanCommand":"Assess agent/browser behavior consistency with UAAG 2.0 guidance; review the ai-policy evidence dimension for UAAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-uaag-26","testId":"ni-wai-uaag-26","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Trust Policy","description":"Validates trust policy coverage for privacy, traceability, metadata, and protected actions for user-agent accessibility behaviors, preferences, and assistive interoperability. Evidence should include trust.json evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Trust Policy appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the trust policy evidence for uaag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-uaag-26","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","uaag","user-agent","w3c","trust-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-uaag check:26","humanCommand":"Assess agent/browser behavior consistency with UAAG 2.0 guidance; review the trust-policy evidence dimension for UAAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-uaag-27","testId":"ni-wai-uaag-27","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Openapi Contract","description":"Validates OpenAPI availability, server URL accuracy, schemas, and auth policy for user-agent accessibility behaviors, preferences, and assistive interoperability. Evidence should include OpenAPI text/JSON evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Openapi Contract appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the openapi contract evidence for uaag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-uaag-27","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","uaag","user-agent","w3c","openapi-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-uaag check:27","humanCommand":"Assess agent/browser behavior consistency with UAAG 2.0 guidance; review the openapi-contract evidence dimension for UAAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-uaag-28","testId":"ni-wai-uaag-28","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Mcp Contract","description":"Validates MCP JSON-RPC introspection, real tools, resources, and protected boundaries for user-agent accessibility behaviors, preferences, and assistive interoperability. Evidence should include MCP manifest and initialize evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Mcp Contract appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the mcp contract evidence for uaag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-uaag-28","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","uaag","user-agent","w3c","mcp-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-uaag check:28","humanCommand":"Assess agent/browser behavior consistency with UAAG 2.0 guidance; review the mcp-contract evidence dimension for UAAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-uaag-29","testId":"ni-wai-uaag-29","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Api Error Shape","description":"Validates API success/error response shape consistency for user-agent accessibility behaviors, preferences, and assistive interoperability. Evidence should include REST envelope evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Api Error Shape appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the api error shape evidence for uaag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-uaag-29","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","uaag","user-agent","w3c","api-error-shape","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-uaag check:29","humanCommand":"Assess agent/browser behavior consistency with UAAG 2.0 guidance; review the api-error-shape evidence dimension for UAAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-uaag-30","testId":"ni-wai-uaag-30","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Traceability","description":"Validates trace propagation, request IDs, and safe observability correlation for user-agent accessibility behaviors, preferences, and assistive interoperability. Evidence should include trace header and metadata evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Traceability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the traceability evidence for uaag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-uaag-30","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","uaag","user-agent","w3c","traceability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-uaag check:30","humanCommand":"Assess agent/browser behavior consistency with UAAG 2.0 guidance; review the traceability evidence dimension for UAAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-uaag-31","testId":"ni-wai-uaag-31","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Ja4 Redaction","description":"Validates fingerprint-adjacent metadata redaction and non-public raw JA4 handling for user-agent accessibility behaviors, preferences, and assistive interoperability. Evidence should include metadata policy and redaction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Ja4 Redaction appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the ja4 redaction evidence for uaag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-uaag-31","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","uaag","user-agent","w3c","ja4-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-uaag check:31","humanCommand":"Assess agent/browser behavior consistency with UAAG 2.0 guidance; review the ja4-redaction evidence dimension for UAAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-uaag-32","testId":"ni-wai-uaag-32","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Secret Redaction","description":"Validates absence of secrets, generic key examples, cookies, and raw tokens in public outputs for user-agent accessibility behaviors, preferences, and assistive interoperability. Evidence should include public artifact scan evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Secret Redaction appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the secret redaction evidence for uaag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-uaag-32","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","uaag","user-agent","w3c","secret-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-uaag check:32","humanCommand":"Assess agent/browser behavior consistency with UAAG 2.0 guidance; review the secret-redaction evidence dimension for UAAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-uaag-33","testId":"ni-wai-uaag-33","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Security Headers","description":"Validates security header coverage and hardened transport signals for user-agent accessibility behaviors, preferences, and assistive interoperability. Evidence should include HTTP header evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Security Headers appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the security headers evidence for uaag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-uaag-33","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","uaag","user-agent","w3c","security-headers","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-uaag check:33","humanCommand":"Assess agent/browser behavior consistency with UAAG 2.0 guidance; review the security-headers evidence dimension for UAAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-uaag-34","testId":"ni-wai-uaag-34","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Privacy Consent","description":"Validates privacy policy, consent, attribution, and data-use disclosure quality for user-agent accessibility behaviors, preferences, and assistive interoperability. Evidence should include public page and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Privacy Consent appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the privacy consent evidence for uaag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-uaag-34","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","uaag","user-agent","w3c","privacy-consent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-uaag check:34","humanCommand":"Assess agent/browser behavior consistency with UAAG 2.0 guidance; review the privacy-consent evidence dimension for UAAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-uaag-35","testId":"ni-wai-uaag-35","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Structured Data","description":"Validates JSON-LD and entity modeling for machine interpretation for user-agent accessibility behaviors, preferences, and assistive interoperability. Evidence should include schema block and parse evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Structured Data appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the structured data evidence for uaag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-uaag-35","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","uaag","user-agent","w3c","structured-data","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-uaag check:35","humanCommand":"Assess agent/browser behavior consistency with UAAG 2.0 guidance; review the structured-data evidence dimension for UAAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-uaag-36","testId":"ni-wai-uaag-36","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Social Preview","description":"Validates Open Graph and Twitter/X card readiness for public sharing for user-agent accessibility behaviors, preferences, and assistive interoperability. Evidence should include meta tag evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Social Preview appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the social preview evidence for uaag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-uaag-36","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","uaag","user-agent","w3c","social-preview","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-uaag check:36","humanCommand":"Assess agent/browser behavior consistency with UAAG 2.0 guidance; review the social-preview evidence dimension for UAAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-uaag-37","testId":"ni-wai-uaag-37","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: I18n Routing","description":"Validates locale route, hreflang, language declaration, and translation readiness for user-agent accessibility behaviors, preferences, and assistive interoperability. Evidence should include lang/hreflang and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: I18n Routing appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the i18n routing evidence for uaag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-uaag-37","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","uaag","user-agent","w3c","i18n-routing","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-uaag check:37","humanCommand":"Assess agent/browser behavior consistency with UAAG 2.0 guidance; review the i18n-routing evidence dimension for UAAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-uaag-38","testId":"ni-wai-uaag-38","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Readability","description":"Validates human readability, sectioning, sentence complexity, and comprehension support for user-agent accessibility behaviors, preferences, and assistive interoperability. Evidence should include extracted content evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Readability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the readability evidence for uaag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-uaag-38","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","uaag","user-agent","w3c","readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-uaag check:38","humanCommand":"Assess agent/browser behavior consistency with UAAG 2.0 guidance; review the readability evidence dimension for UAAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-uaag-39","testId":"ni-wai-uaag-39","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Content Utility","description":"Validates non-placeholder content usefulness and domain-specific public value for user-agent accessibility behaviors, preferences, and assistive interoperability. Evidence should include content extraction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Content Utility appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the content utility evidence for uaag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-uaag-39","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","uaag","user-agent","w3c","content-utility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-uaag check:39","humanCommand":"Assess agent/browser behavior consistency with UAAG 2.0 guidance; review the content-utility evidence dimension for UAAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-uaag-40","testId":"ni-wai-uaag-40","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Recommendation Grounding","description":"Validates recommendation grounding in deterministic evidence instead of fabricated model output for user-agent accessibility behaviors, preferences, and assistive interoperability. Evidence should include issue and remediation evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Recommendation Grounding appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the recommendation grounding evidence for uaag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-uaag-40","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","uaag","user-agent","w3c","recommendation-grounding","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-uaag check:40","humanCommand":"Assess agent/browser behavior consistency with UAAG 2.0 guidance; review the recommendation-grounding evidence dimension for UAAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-uaag-41","testId":"ni-wai-uaag-41","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Evidence Quality","description":"Validates evidence completeness, public safety, and reproducibility for user-agent accessibility behaviors, preferences, and assistive interoperability. Evidence should include test output and artifact evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Evidence Quality appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the evidence quality evidence for uaag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-uaag-41","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","uaag","user-agent","w3c","evidence-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-uaag check:41","humanCommand":"Assess agent/browser behavior consistency with UAAG 2.0 guidance; review the evidence-quality evidence dimension for UAAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-uaag-42","testId":"ni-wai-uaag-42","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Threshold Policy","description":"Validates threshold clarity, pass/warn/fail semantics, and scoring transparency for user-agent accessibility behaviors, preferences, and assistive interoperability. Evidence should include threshold and result status evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Threshold Policy appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the threshold policy evidence for uaag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-uaag-42","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","uaag","user-agent","w3c","threshold-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-uaag check:42","humanCommand":"Assess agent/browser behavior consistency with UAAG 2.0 guidance; review the threshold-policy evidence dimension for UAAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-uaag-43","testId":"ni-wai-uaag-43","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Confidence","description":"Validates confidence scoring and degraded-input disclosure for user-agent accessibility behaviors, preferences, and assistive interoperability. Evidence should include source freshness and input availability evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Confidence appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the confidence evidence for uaag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-uaag-43","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","uaag","user-agent","w3c","confidence","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-uaag check:43","humanCommand":"Assess agent/browser behavior consistency with UAAG 2.0 guidance; review the confidence evidence dimension for UAAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-uaag-44","testId":"ni-wai-uaag-44","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Trend Readiness","description":"Validates historical comparability and timeline readiness for future reruns for user-agent accessibility behaviors, preferences, and assistive interoperability. Evidence should include analysis ID, timestamp, and persistence evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Trend Readiness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the trend readiness evidence for uaag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-uaag-44","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","uaag","user-agent","w3c","trend-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-uaag check:44","humanCommand":"Assess agent/browser behavior consistency with UAAG 2.0 guidance; review the trend-readiness evidence dimension for UAAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-uaag-45","testId":"ni-wai-uaag-45","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Ranking Readiness","description":"Validates ranking input completeness and profile compatibility for user-agent accessibility behaviors, preferences, and assistive interoperability. Evidence should include score and profile evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Ranking Readiness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ranking readiness evidence for uaag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-uaag-45","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","uaag","user-agent","w3c","ranking-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-uaag check:45","humanCommand":"Assess agent/browser behavior consistency with UAAG 2.0 guidance; review the ranking-readiness evidence dimension for UAAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-uaag-46","testId":"ni-wai-uaag-46","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Network Contribution","description":"Validates PlatPhorm network contribution through discovery, integrations, and standards compliance for user-agent accessibility behaviors, preferences, and assistive interoperability. Evidence should include network graph and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Network Contribution appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the network contribution evidence for uaag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-uaag-46","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","uaag","user-agent","w3c","network-contribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-uaag check:46","humanCommand":"Assess agent/browser behavior consistency with UAAG 2.0 guidance; review the network-contribution evidence dimension for UAAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-uaag-47","testId":"ni-wai-uaag-47","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Report Readiness","description":"Validates report/export categorization with public-safe evidence and protected boundaries for user-agent accessibility behaviors, preferences, and assistive interoperability. Evidence should include report section mapping evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Report Readiness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the report readiness evidence for uaag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-uaag-47","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","uaag","user-agent","w3c","report-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-uaag check:47","humanCommand":"Assess agent/browser behavior consistency with UAAG 2.0 guidance; review the report-readiness evidence dimension for UAAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-uaag-48","testId":"ni-wai-uaag-48","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Operator Actionability","description":"Validates clear remediation, owner action, difficulty, and retest path for user-agent accessibility behaviors, preferences, and assistive interoperability. Evidence should include fix instructions and command evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Operator Actionability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the operator actionability evidence for uaag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-uaag-48","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","uaag","user-agent","w3c","operator-actionability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-uaag check:48","humanCommand":"Assess agent/browser behavior consistency with UAAG 2.0 guidance; review the operator-actionability evidence dimension for UAAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-uaag-49","testId":"ni-wai-uaag-49","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Degraded State","description":"Validates honest degraded, unavailable, skipped, and not-applicable states for user-agent accessibility behaviors, preferences, and assistive interoperability. Evidence should include status and storage evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Degraded State appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the degraded state evidence for uaag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-uaag-49","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","uaag","user-agent","w3c","degraded-state","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-uaag check:49","humanCommand":"Assess agent/browser behavior consistency with UAAG 2.0 guidance; review the degraded-state evidence dimension for UAAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-uaag-50","testId":"ni-wai-uaag-50","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Reproducibility","description":"Validates stable CLI/API/human reproduction path and deterministic rerun instructions for user-agent accessibility behaviors, preferences, and assistive interoperability. Evidence should include commands and registry version evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"UAAG 2.0 Alignment: Reproducibility appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the reproducibility evidence for uaag 2.0 alignment, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-uaag-50","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","uaag","user-agent","w3c","reproducibility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-uaag check:50","humanCommand":"Assess agent/browser behavior consistency with UAAG 2.0 guidance; review the reproducibility evidence dimension for UAAG 2.0 Alignment"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-01","testId":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-01","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Availability","description":"Validates public route availability and successful bounded fetch behavior for wcag adaptation checks for non-web ICT and embedded web-like interfaces. Evidence should include HTTP status, timeout, and redirect evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Availability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the availability evidence for wcag2ict applicability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag2ict-01","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag2ict","ict","w3c","availability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-wcag2ict check:1","humanCommand":"Evaluate digital interface coverage against WCAG2ICT guidance; review the availability evidence dimension for WCAG2ICT Applicability"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-02","testId":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-02","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Public Safety","description":"Validates public-safe access boundaries without exposing private or protected data for wcag adaptation checks for non-web ICT and embedded web-like interfaces. Evidence should include route policy and response-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Public Safety appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the public safety evidence for wcag2ict applicability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag2ict-02","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag2ict","ict","w3c","public-safety","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-wcag2ict check:2","humanCommand":"Evaluate digital interface coverage against WCAG2ICT guidance; review the public-safety evidence dimension for WCAG2ICT Applicability"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-03","testId":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-03","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Canonical Url","description":"Validates canonical URL stability and normalized route identity for wcag adaptation checks for non-web ICT and embedded web-like interfaces. Evidence should include canonical tags, redirects, and normalized URL evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Canonical Url appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the canonical url evidence for wcag2ict applicability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag2ict-03","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag2ict","ict","w3c","canonical-url","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-wcag2ict check:3","humanCommand":"Evaluate digital interface coverage against WCAG2ICT guidance; review the canonical-url evidence dimension for WCAG2ICT Applicability"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-04","testId":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-04","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Metadata Clarity","description":"Validates title, description, and page-specific metadata clarity for wcag adaptation checks for non-web ICT and embedded web-like interfaces. Evidence should include HTML metadata and extracted text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Metadata Clarity appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the metadata clarity evidence for wcag2ict applicability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag2ict-04","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag2ict","ict","w3c","metadata-clarity","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-wcag2ict check:4","humanCommand":"Evaluate digital interface coverage against WCAG2ICT guidance; review the metadata-clarity evidence dimension for WCAG2ICT Applicability"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-05","testId":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-05","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Semantic Structure","description":"Validates semantic HTML structure for humans, agents, and assistive technology for wcag adaptation checks for non-web ICT and embedded web-like interfaces. Evidence should include heading, landmark, and element evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Semantic Structure appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the semantic structure evidence for wcag2ict applicability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag2ict-05","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag2ict","ict","w3c","semantic-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-wcag2ict check:5","humanCommand":"Evaluate digital interface coverage against WCAG2ICT guidance; review the semantic-structure evidence dimension for WCAG2ICT Applicability"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-06","testId":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-06","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Machine Readability","description":"Validates machine-readable public content and predictable parsing surfaces for wcag adaptation checks for non-web ICT and embedded web-like interfaces. Evidence should include structured tags, JSON-LD, and document-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Machine Readability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the machine readability evidence for wcag2ict applicability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag2ict-06","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag2ict","ict","w3c","machine-readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-wcag2ict check:6","humanCommand":"Evaluate digital interface coverage against WCAG2ICT guidance; review the machine-readability evidence dimension for WCAG2ICT Applicability"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-07","testId":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-07","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Agent Discovery","description":"Validates agent discovery hints and AI-readable policy/documentation signals for wcag adaptation checks for non-web ICT and embedded web-like interfaces. Evidence should include llms, policy, MCP, OpenAPI, or schema evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Agent Discovery appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the agent discovery evidence for wcag2ict applicability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag2ict-07","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag2ict","ict","w3c","agent-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-wcag2ict check:7","humanCommand":"Evaluate digital interface coverage against WCAG2ICT guidance; review the agent-discovery evidence dimension for WCAG2ICT Applicability"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-08","testId":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-08","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Crawler Discovery","description":"Validates crawler discovery paths through robots, sitemap, feeds, and canonical links for wcag adaptation checks for non-web ICT and embedded web-like interfaces. Evidence should include discovery artifact and link evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Crawler Discovery appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the crawler discovery evidence for wcag2ict applicability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag2ict-08","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag2ict","ict","w3c","crawler-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-wcag2ict check:8","humanCommand":"Evaluate digital interface coverage against WCAG2ICT guidance; review the crawler-discovery evidence dimension for WCAG2ICT Applicability"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-09","testId":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-09","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Answerability","description":"Validates direct answer extraction and quotable explanatory content for wcag adaptation checks for non-web ICT and embedded web-like interfaces. Evidence should include question, summary, heading, and paragraph evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Answerability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the answerability evidence for wcag2ict applicability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag2ict-09","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag2ict","ict","w3c","answerability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-wcag2ict check:9","humanCommand":"Evaluate digital interface coverage against WCAG2ICT guidance; review the answerability evidence dimension for WCAG2ICT Applicability"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-10","testId":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-10","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Generative Context","description":"Validates GEO context quality for generative engines without inventing measured facts for wcag adaptation checks for non-web ICT and embedded web-like interfaces. Evidence should include entity, source, and instruction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Generative Context appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the generative context evidence for wcag2ict applicability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag2ict-10","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag2ict","ict","w3c","generative-context","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-wcag2ict check:10","humanCommand":"Evaluate digital interface coverage against WCAG2ICT guidance; review the generative-context evidence dimension for WCAG2ICT Applicability"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-11","testId":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-11","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Search Intent","description":"Validates search intent alignment and snippet-friendly content structure for wcag adaptation checks for non-web ICT and embedded web-like interfaces. Evidence should include metadata, headings, and topical text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Search Intent appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the search intent evidence for wcag2ict applicability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag2ict-11","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag2ict","ict","w3c","search-intent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-wcag2ict check:11","humanCommand":"Evaluate digital interface coverage against WCAG2ICT guidance; review the search-intent evidence dimension for WCAG2ICT Applicability"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-12","testId":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-12","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Accessibility Semantics","description":"Validates accessible names, relationships, landmarks, and keyboard-relevant structure for wcag adaptation checks for non-web ICT and embedded web-like interfaces. Evidence should include ARIA, labels, landmarks, and control evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Accessibility Semantics appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the accessibility semantics evidence for wcag2ict applicability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag2ict-12","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag2ict","ict","w3c","accessibility-semantics","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-wcag2ict check:12","humanCommand":"Evaluate digital interface coverage against WCAG2ICT guidance; review the accessibility-semantics evidence dimension for WCAG2ICT Applicability"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-13","testId":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-13","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Mobile Readiness","description":"Validates mobile viewport, responsive content, and touch-friendly layout signals for wcag adaptation checks for non-web ICT and embedded web-like interfaces. Evidence should include viewport and responsive asset evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Mobile Readiness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the mobile readiness evidence for wcag2ict applicability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag2ict-13","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag2ict","ict","w3c","mobile-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-wcag2ict check:13","humanCommand":"Evaluate digital interface coverage against WCAG2ICT guidance; review the mobile-readiness evidence dimension for WCAG2ICT Applicability"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-14","testId":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-14","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Performance Budget","description":"Validates performance budget compliance using measured or bounded deterministic inputs for wcag adaptation checks for non-web ICT and embedded web-like interfaces. Evidence should include timing, byte, and Lighthouse-derived evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Performance Budget appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the performance budget evidence for wcag2ict applicability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag2ict-14","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag2ict","ict","w3c","performance-budget","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-wcag2ict check:14","humanCommand":"Evaluate digital interface coverage against WCAG2ICT guidance; review the performance-budget evidence dimension for WCAG2ICT Applicability"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-15","testId":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-15","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Resource Efficiency","description":"Validates resource size, script/style count, and optimization opportunity signals for wcag adaptation checks for non-web ICT and embedded web-like interfaces. Evidence should include resource and markup evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Resource Efficiency appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the resource efficiency evidence for wcag2ict applicability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag2ict-15","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag2ict","ict","w3c","resource-efficiency","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-wcag2ict check:15","humanCommand":"Evaluate digital interface coverage against WCAG2ICT guidance; review the resource-efficiency evidence dimension for WCAG2ICT Applicability"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-16","testId":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-16","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Cache Freshness","description":"Validates cache behavior, freshness hints, and stale-content risk for wcag adaptation checks for non-web ICT and embedded web-like interfaces. Evidence should include HTTP cache and timestamp evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Cache Freshness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the cache freshness evidence for wcag2ict applicability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag2ict-16","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag2ict","ict","w3c","cache-freshness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-wcag2ict check:16","humanCommand":"Evaluate digital interface coverage against WCAG2ICT guidance; review the cache-freshness evidence dimension for WCAG2ICT Applicability"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-17","testId":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-17","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Route Reliability","description":"Validates route reliability, redirect safety, and dead-link risk for wcag adaptation checks for non-web ICT and embedded web-like interfaces. Evidence should include status, redirect, and sitemap evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Route Reliability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the route reliability evidence for wcag2ict applicability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag2ict-17","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag2ict","ict","w3c","route-reliability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-wcag2ict check:17","humanCommand":"Evaluate digital interface coverage against WCAG2ICT guidance; review the route-reliability evidence dimension for WCAG2ICT Applicability"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-18","testId":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-18","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Feed Quality","description":"Validates RSS/Atom/feed usefulness, parseability, and freshness for wcag adaptation checks for non-web ICT and embedded web-like interfaces. Evidence should include feed XML and item evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Feed Quality appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the feed quality evidence for wcag2ict applicability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag2ict-18","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag2ict","ict","w3c","feed-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-wcag2ict check:18","humanCommand":"Evaluate digital interface coverage against WCAG2ICT guidance; review the feed-quality evidence dimension for WCAG2ICT Applicability"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-19","testId":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-19","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Sitemap Quality","description":"Validates sitemap validity, public-safe URL coverage, and no-dead-link policy for wcag adaptation checks for non-web ICT and embedded web-like interfaces. Evidence should include sitemap XML and bounded link-check evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Sitemap Quality appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the sitemap quality evidence for wcag2ict applicability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag2ict-19","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag2ict","ict","w3c","sitemap-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-wcag2ict check:19","humanCommand":"Evaluate digital interface coverage against WCAG2ICT guidance; review the sitemap-quality evidence dimension for WCAG2ICT Applicability"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-20","testId":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-20","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Robots Alignment","description":"Validates robots.txt alignment with public/protected policy and sitemap discovery for wcag adaptation checks for non-web ICT and embedded web-like interfaces. Evidence should include robots directives and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Robots Alignment appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the robots alignment evidence for wcag2ict applicability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag2ict-20","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag2ict","ict","w3c","robots-alignment","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-wcag2ict check:20","humanCommand":"Evaluate digital interface coverage against WCAG2ICT guidance; review the robots-alignment evidence dimension for WCAG2ICT Applicability"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-21","testId":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-21","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Llms Structure","description":"Validates llms.txt structure, readability, endpoint coverage, and agent usefulness for wcag adaptation checks for non-web ICT and embedded web-like interfaces. Evidence should include plain-text section and line-length evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Llms Structure appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms structure evidence for wcag2ict applicability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag2ict-21","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag2ict","ict","w3c","llms-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-wcag2ict check:21","humanCommand":"Evaluate digital interface coverage against WCAG2ICT guidance; review the llms-structure evidence dimension for WCAG2ICT Applicability"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-22","testId":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-22","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Llms Index Schema","description":"Validates llms-index JSON schema shape and count reconciliation for wcag adaptation checks for non-web ICT and embedded web-like interfaces. Evidence should include JSON keys, counts, and endpoint evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Llms Index Schema appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms index schema evidence for wcag2ict applicability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag2ict-22","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag2ict","ict","w3c","llms-index-schema","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-wcag2ict check:22","humanCommand":"Evaluate digital interface coverage against WCAG2ICT guidance; review the llms-index-schema evidence dimension for WCAG2ICT Applicability"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-23","testId":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-23","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Humans Attribution","description":"Validates humans.txt attribution, maintainer, technology, and governance transparency for wcag adaptation checks for non-web ICT and embedded web-like interfaces. Evidence should include humans.txt section evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Humans Attribution appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the humans attribution evidence for wcag2ict applicability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag2ict-23","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag2ict","ict","w3c","humans-attribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-wcag2ict check:23","humanCommand":"Evaluate digital interface coverage against WCAG2ICT guidance; review the humans-attribution evidence dimension for WCAG2ICT Applicability"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-24","testId":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-24","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Agent Policy","description":"Validates agent-policy JSON clarity for allowed, disallowed, and protected operations for wcag adaptation checks for non-web ICT and embedded web-like interfaces. Evidence should include well-known policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Agent Policy appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the agent policy evidence for wcag2ict applicability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag2ict-24","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag2ict","ict","w3c","agent-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-wcag2ict check:24","humanCommand":"Evaluate digital interface coverage against WCAG2ICT guidance; review the agent-policy evidence dimension for WCAG2ICT Applicability"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-25","testId":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-25","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Ai Policy","description":"Validates AI policy clarity for training, search, answer use, caching, and attribution for wcag adaptation checks for non-web ICT and embedded web-like interfaces. Evidence should include well-known AI policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Ai Policy appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ai policy evidence for wcag2ict applicability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag2ict-25","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag2ict","ict","w3c","ai-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-wcag2ict check:25","humanCommand":"Evaluate digital interface coverage against WCAG2ICT guidance; review the ai-policy evidence dimension for WCAG2ICT Applicability"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-26","testId":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-26","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Trust Policy","description":"Validates trust policy coverage for privacy, traceability, metadata, and protected actions for wcag adaptation checks for non-web ICT and embedded web-like interfaces. Evidence should include trust.json evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Trust Policy appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the trust policy evidence for wcag2ict applicability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag2ict-26","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag2ict","ict","w3c","trust-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-wcag2ict check:26","humanCommand":"Evaluate digital interface coverage against WCAG2ICT guidance; review the trust-policy evidence dimension for WCAG2ICT Applicability"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-27","testId":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-27","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Openapi Contract","description":"Validates OpenAPI availability, server URL accuracy, schemas, and auth policy for wcag adaptation checks for non-web ICT and embedded web-like interfaces. Evidence should include OpenAPI text/JSON evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Openapi Contract appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the openapi contract evidence for wcag2ict applicability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag2ict-27","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag2ict","ict","w3c","openapi-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-wcag2ict check:27","humanCommand":"Evaluate digital interface coverage against WCAG2ICT guidance; review the openapi-contract evidence dimension for WCAG2ICT Applicability"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-28","testId":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-28","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Mcp Contract","description":"Validates MCP JSON-RPC introspection, real tools, resources, and protected boundaries for wcag adaptation checks for non-web ICT and embedded web-like interfaces. Evidence should include MCP manifest and initialize evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Mcp Contract appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the mcp contract evidence for wcag2ict applicability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag2ict-28","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag2ict","ict","w3c","mcp-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-wcag2ict check:28","humanCommand":"Evaluate digital interface coverage against WCAG2ICT guidance; review the mcp-contract evidence dimension for WCAG2ICT Applicability"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-29","testId":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-29","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Api Error Shape","description":"Validates API success/error response shape consistency for wcag adaptation checks for non-web ICT and embedded web-like interfaces. Evidence should include REST envelope evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Api Error Shape appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the api error shape evidence for wcag2ict applicability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag2ict-29","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag2ict","ict","w3c","api-error-shape","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-wcag2ict check:29","humanCommand":"Evaluate digital interface coverage against WCAG2ICT guidance; review the api-error-shape evidence dimension for WCAG2ICT Applicability"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-30","testId":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-30","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Traceability","description":"Validates trace propagation, request IDs, and safe observability correlation for wcag adaptation checks for non-web ICT and embedded web-like interfaces. Evidence should include trace header and metadata evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Traceability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the traceability evidence for wcag2ict applicability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag2ict-30","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag2ict","ict","w3c","traceability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-wcag2ict check:30","humanCommand":"Evaluate digital interface coverage against WCAG2ICT guidance; review the traceability evidence dimension for WCAG2ICT Applicability"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-31","testId":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-31","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Ja4 Redaction","description":"Validates fingerprint-adjacent metadata redaction and non-public raw JA4 handling for wcag adaptation checks for non-web ICT and embedded web-like interfaces. Evidence should include metadata policy and redaction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Ja4 Redaction appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the ja4 redaction evidence for wcag2ict applicability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag2ict-31","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag2ict","ict","w3c","ja4-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-wcag2ict check:31","humanCommand":"Evaluate digital interface coverage against WCAG2ICT guidance; review the ja4-redaction evidence dimension for WCAG2ICT Applicability"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-32","testId":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-32","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Secret Redaction","description":"Validates absence of secrets, generic key examples, cookies, and raw tokens in public outputs for wcag adaptation checks for non-web ICT and embedded web-like interfaces. Evidence should include public artifact scan evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Secret Redaction appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the secret redaction evidence for wcag2ict applicability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag2ict-32","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag2ict","ict","w3c","secret-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-wcag2ict check:32","humanCommand":"Evaluate digital interface coverage against WCAG2ICT guidance; review the secret-redaction evidence dimension for WCAG2ICT Applicability"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-33","testId":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-33","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Security Headers","description":"Validates security header coverage and hardened transport signals for wcag adaptation checks for non-web ICT and embedded web-like interfaces. Evidence should include HTTP header evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Security Headers appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the security headers evidence for wcag2ict applicability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag2ict-33","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag2ict","ict","w3c","security-headers","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-wcag2ict check:33","humanCommand":"Evaluate digital interface coverage against WCAG2ICT guidance; review the security-headers evidence dimension for WCAG2ICT Applicability"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-34","testId":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-34","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Privacy Consent","description":"Validates privacy policy, consent, attribution, and data-use disclosure quality for wcag adaptation checks for non-web ICT and embedded web-like interfaces. Evidence should include public page and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Privacy Consent appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the privacy consent evidence for wcag2ict applicability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag2ict-34","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag2ict","ict","w3c","privacy-consent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-wcag2ict check:34","humanCommand":"Evaluate digital interface coverage against WCAG2ICT guidance; review the privacy-consent evidence dimension for WCAG2ICT Applicability"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-35","testId":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-35","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Structured Data","description":"Validates JSON-LD and entity modeling for machine interpretation for wcag adaptation checks for non-web ICT and embedded web-like interfaces. Evidence should include schema block and parse evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Structured Data appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the structured data evidence for wcag2ict applicability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag2ict-35","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag2ict","ict","w3c","structured-data","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-wcag2ict check:35","humanCommand":"Evaluate digital interface coverage against WCAG2ICT guidance; review the structured-data evidence dimension for WCAG2ICT Applicability"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-36","testId":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-36","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Social Preview","description":"Validates Open Graph and Twitter/X card readiness for public sharing for wcag adaptation checks for non-web ICT and embedded web-like interfaces. Evidence should include meta tag evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Social Preview appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the social preview evidence for wcag2ict applicability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag2ict-36","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag2ict","ict","w3c","social-preview","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-wcag2ict check:36","humanCommand":"Evaluate digital interface coverage against WCAG2ICT guidance; review the social-preview evidence dimension for WCAG2ICT Applicability"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-37","testId":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-37","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: I18n Routing","description":"Validates locale route, hreflang, language declaration, and translation readiness for wcag adaptation checks for non-web ICT and embedded web-like interfaces. Evidence should include lang/hreflang and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: I18n Routing appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the i18n routing evidence for wcag2ict applicability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag2ict-37","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag2ict","ict","w3c","i18n-routing","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-wcag2ict check:37","humanCommand":"Evaluate digital interface coverage against WCAG2ICT guidance; review the i18n-routing evidence dimension for WCAG2ICT Applicability"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-38","testId":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-38","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Readability","description":"Validates human readability, sectioning, sentence complexity, and comprehension support for wcag adaptation checks for non-web ICT and embedded web-like interfaces. Evidence should include extracted content evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Readability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the readability evidence for wcag2ict applicability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag2ict-38","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag2ict","ict","w3c","readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-wcag2ict check:38","humanCommand":"Evaluate digital interface coverage against WCAG2ICT guidance; review the readability evidence dimension for WCAG2ICT Applicability"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-39","testId":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-39","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Content Utility","description":"Validates non-placeholder content usefulness and domain-specific public value for wcag adaptation checks for non-web ICT and embedded web-like interfaces. Evidence should include content extraction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Content Utility appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the content utility evidence for wcag2ict applicability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag2ict-39","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag2ict","ict","w3c","content-utility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-wcag2ict check:39","humanCommand":"Evaluate digital interface coverage against WCAG2ICT guidance; review the content-utility evidence dimension for WCAG2ICT Applicability"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-40","testId":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-40","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Recommendation Grounding","description":"Validates recommendation grounding in deterministic evidence instead of fabricated model output for wcag adaptation checks for non-web ICT and embedded web-like interfaces. Evidence should include issue and remediation evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Recommendation Grounding appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the recommendation grounding evidence for wcag2ict applicability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag2ict-40","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag2ict","ict","w3c","recommendation-grounding","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-wcag2ict check:40","humanCommand":"Evaluate digital interface coverage against WCAG2ICT guidance; review the recommendation-grounding evidence dimension for WCAG2ICT Applicability"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-41","testId":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-41","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Evidence Quality","description":"Validates evidence completeness, public safety, and reproducibility for wcag adaptation checks for non-web ICT and embedded web-like interfaces. Evidence should include test output and artifact evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Evidence Quality appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the evidence quality evidence for wcag2ict applicability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag2ict-41","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag2ict","ict","w3c","evidence-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-wcag2ict check:41","humanCommand":"Evaluate digital interface coverage against WCAG2ICT guidance; review the evidence-quality evidence dimension for WCAG2ICT Applicability"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-42","testId":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-42","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Threshold Policy","description":"Validates threshold clarity, pass/warn/fail semantics, and scoring transparency for wcag adaptation checks for non-web ICT and embedded web-like interfaces. Evidence should include threshold and result status evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Threshold Policy appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the threshold policy evidence for wcag2ict applicability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag2ict-42","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag2ict","ict","w3c","threshold-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-wcag2ict check:42","humanCommand":"Evaluate digital interface coverage against WCAG2ICT guidance; review the threshold-policy evidence dimension for WCAG2ICT Applicability"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-43","testId":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-43","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Confidence","description":"Validates confidence scoring and degraded-input disclosure for wcag adaptation checks for non-web ICT and embedded web-like interfaces. Evidence should include source freshness and input availability evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Confidence appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the confidence evidence for wcag2ict applicability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag2ict-43","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag2ict","ict","w3c","confidence","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-wcag2ict check:43","humanCommand":"Evaluate digital interface coverage against WCAG2ICT guidance; review the confidence evidence dimension for WCAG2ICT Applicability"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-44","testId":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-44","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Trend Readiness","description":"Validates historical comparability and timeline readiness for future reruns for wcag adaptation checks for non-web ICT and embedded web-like interfaces. Evidence should include analysis ID, timestamp, and persistence evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Trend Readiness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the trend readiness evidence for wcag2ict applicability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag2ict-44","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag2ict","ict","w3c","trend-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-wcag2ict check:44","humanCommand":"Evaluate digital interface coverage against WCAG2ICT guidance; review the trend-readiness evidence dimension for WCAG2ICT Applicability"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-45","testId":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-45","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Ranking Readiness","description":"Validates ranking input completeness and profile compatibility for wcag adaptation checks for non-web ICT and embedded web-like interfaces. Evidence should include score and profile evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Ranking Readiness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ranking readiness evidence for wcag2ict applicability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag2ict-45","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag2ict","ict","w3c","ranking-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-wcag2ict check:45","humanCommand":"Evaluate digital interface coverage against WCAG2ICT guidance; review the ranking-readiness evidence dimension for WCAG2ICT Applicability"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-46","testId":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-46","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Network Contribution","description":"Validates PlatPhorm network contribution through discovery, integrations, and standards compliance for wcag adaptation checks for non-web ICT and embedded web-like interfaces. Evidence should include network graph and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Network Contribution appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the network contribution evidence for wcag2ict applicability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag2ict-46","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag2ict","ict","w3c","network-contribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-wcag2ict check:46","humanCommand":"Evaluate digital interface coverage against WCAG2ICT guidance; review the network-contribution evidence dimension for WCAG2ICT Applicability"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-47","testId":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-47","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Report Readiness","description":"Validates report/export categorization with public-safe evidence and protected boundaries for wcag adaptation checks for non-web ICT and embedded web-like interfaces. Evidence should include report section mapping evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Report Readiness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the report readiness evidence for wcag2ict applicability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag2ict-47","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag2ict","ict","w3c","report-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-wcag2ict check:47","humanCommand":"Evaluate digital interface coverage against WCAG2ICT guidance; review the report-readiness evidence dimension for WCAG2ICT Applicability"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-48","testId":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-48","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Operator Actionability","description":"Validates clear remediation, owner action, difficulty, and retest path for wcag adaptation checks for non-web ICT and embedded web-like interfaces. Evidence should include fix instructions and command evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Operator Actionability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the operator actionability evidence for wcag2ict applicability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag2ict-48","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag2ict","ict","w3c","operator-actionability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-wcag2ict check:48","humanCommand":"Evaluate digital interface coverage against WCAG2ICT guidance; review the operator-actionability evidence dimension for WCAG2ICT Applicability"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-49","testId":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-49","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Degraded State","description":"Validates honest degraded, unavailable, skipped, and not-applicable states for wcag adaptation checks for non-web ICT and embedded web-like interfaces. Evidence should include status and storage evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Degraded State appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the degraded state evidence for wcag2ict applicability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag2ict-49","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag2ict","ict","w3c","degraded-state","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-wcag2ict check:49","humanCommand":"Evaluate digital interface coverage against WCAG2ICT guidance; review the degraded-state evidence dimension for WCAG2ICT Applicability"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-50","testId":"ni-wai-wcag2ict-50","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Reproducibility","description":"Validates stable CLI/API/human reproduction path and deterministic rerun instructions for wcag adaptation checks for non-web ICT and embedded web-like interfaces. Evidence should include commands and registry version evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG2ICT Applicability: Reproducibility appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the reproducibility evidence for wcag2ict applicability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag2ict-50","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag2ict","ict","w3c","reproducibility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:wai-wcag2ict check:50","humanCommand":"Evaluate digital interface coverage against WCAG2ICT guidance; review the reproducibility evidence dimension for WCAG2ICT Applicability"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag3-01","testId":"ni-wai-wcag3-01","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Availability","description":"Validates public route availability and successful bounded fetch behavior for future-ready accessibility quality signals aligned with WCAG 3 direction. Evidence should include HTTP status, timeout, and redirect evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Availability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the availability evidence for wcag 3 exploratory readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag3-01","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag3","future-standard","w3c","availability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-wcag3 check:1","humanCommand":"Assess readiness and evidence quality aligned with WCAG 3 evolution; review the availability evidence dimension for WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag3-02","testId":"ni-wai-wcag3-02","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Public Safety","description":"Validates public-safe access boundaries without exposing private or protected data for future-ready accessibility quality signals aligned with WCAG 3 direction. Evidence should include route policy and response-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Public Safety appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the public safety evidence for wcag 3 exploratory readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag3-02","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag3","future-standard","w3c","public-safety","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-wcag3 check:2","humanCommand":"Assess readiness and evidence quality aligned with WCAG 3 evolution; review the public-safety evidence dimension for WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag3-03","testId":"ni-wai-wcag3-03","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Canonical Url","description":"Validates canonical URL stability and normalized route identity for future-ready accessibility quality signals aligned with WCAG 3 direction. Evidence should include canonical tags, redirects, and normalized URL evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Canonical Url appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the canonical url evidence for wcag 3 exploratory readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag3-03","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag3","future-standard","w3c","canonical-url","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-wcag3 check:3","humanCommand":"Assess readiness and evidence quality aligned with WCAG 3 evolution; review the canonical-url evidence dimension for WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag3-04","testId":"ni-wai-wcag3-04","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Metadata Clarity","description":"Validates title, description, and page-specific metadata clarity for future-ready accessibility quality signals aligned with WCAG 3 direction. Evidence should include HTML metadata and extracted text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Metadata Clarity appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the metadata clarity evidence for wcag 3 exploratory readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag3-04","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag3","future-standard","w3c","metadata-clarity","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-wcag3 check:4","humanCommand":"Assess readiness and evidence quality aligned with WCAG 3 evolution; review the metadata-clarity evidence dimension for WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag3-05","testId":"ni-wai-wcag3-05","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Semantic Structure","description":"Validates semantic HTML structure for humans, agents, and assistive technology for future-ready accessibility quality signals aligned with WCAG 3 direction. Evidence should include heading, landmark, and element evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Semantic Structure appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the semantic structure evidence for wcag 3 exploratory readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag3-05","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag3","future-standard","w3c","semantic-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-wcag3 check:5","humanCommand":"Assess readiness and evidence quality aligned with WCAG 3 evolution; review the semantic-structure evidence dimension for WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag3-06","testId":"ni-wai-wcag3-06","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Machine Readability","description":"Validates machine-readable public content and predictable parsing surfaces for future-ready accessibility quality signals aligned with WCAG 3 direction. Evidence should include structured tags, JSON-LD, and document-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Machine Readability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the machine readability evidence for wcag 3 exploratory readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag3-06","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag3","future-standard","w3c","machine-readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-wcag3 check:6","humanCommand":"Assess readiness and evidence quality aligned with WCAG 3 evolution; review the machine-readability evidence dimension for WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag3-07","testId":"ni-wai-wcag3-07","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Agent Discovery","description":"Validates agent discovery hints and AI-readable policy/documentation signals for future-ready accessibility quality signals aligned with WCAG 3 direction. Evidence should include llms, policy, MCP, OpenAPI, or schema evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Agent Discovery appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the agent discovery evidence for wcag 3 exploratory readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag3-07","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag3","future-standard","w3c","agent-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-wcag3 check:7","humanCommand":"Assess readiness and evidence quality aligned with WCAG 3 evolution; review the agent-discovery evidence dimension for WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag3-08","testId":"ni-wai-wcag3-08","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Crawler Discovery","description":"Validates crawler discovery paths through robots, sitemap, feeds, and canonical links for future-ready accessibility quality signals aligned with WCAG 3 direction. Evidence should include discovery artifact and link evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Crawler Discovery appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the crawler discovery evidence for wcag 3 exploratory readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag3-08","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag3","future-standard","w3c","crawler-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-wcag3 check:8","humanCommand":"Assess readiness and evidence quality aligned with WCAG 3 evolution; review the crawler-discovery evidence dimension for WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag3-09","testId":"ni-wai-wcag3-09","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Answerability","description":"Validates direct answer extraction and quotable explanatory content for future-ready accessibility quality signals aligned with WCAG 3 direction. Evidence should include question, summary, heading, and paragraph evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Answerability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the answerability evidence for wcag 3 exploratory readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag3-09","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag3","future-standard","w3c","answerability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-wcag3 check:9","humanCommand":"Assess readiness and evidence quality aligned with WCAG 3 evolution; review the answerability evidence dimension for WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag3-10","testId":"ni-wai-wcag3-10","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Generative Context","description":"Validates GEO context quality for generative engines without inventing measured facts for future-ready accessibility quality signals aligned with WCAG 3 direction. Evidence should include entity, source, and instruction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Generative Context appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the generative context evidence for wcag 3 exploratory readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag3-10","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag3","future-standard","w3c","generative-context","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-wcag3 check:10","humanCommand":"Assess readiness and evidence quality aligned with WCAG 3 evolution; review the generative-context evidence dimension for WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag3-11","testId":"ni-wai-wcag3-11","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Search Intent","description":"Validates search intent alignment and snippet-friendly content structure for future-ready accessibility quality signals aligned with WCAG 3 direction. Evidence should include metadata, headings, and topical text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Search Intent appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the search intent evidence for wcag 3 exploratory readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag3-11","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag3","future-standard","w3c","search-intent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-wcag3 check:11","humanCommand":"Assess readiness and evidence quality aligned with WCAG 3 evolution; review the search-intent evidence dimension for WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag3-12","testId":"ni-wai-wcag3-12","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Accessibility Semantics","description":"Validates accessible names, relationships, landmarks, and keyboard-relevant structure for future-ready accessibility quality signals aligned with WCAG 3 direction. Evidence should include ARIA, labels, landmarks, and control evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Accessibility Semantics appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the accessibility semantics evidence for wcag 3 exploratory readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag3-12","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag3","future-standard","w3c","accessibility-semantics","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-wcag3 check:12","humanCommand":"Assess readiness and evidence quality aligned with WCAG 3 evolution; review the accessibility-semantics evidence dimension for WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag3-13","testId":"ni-wai-wcag3-13","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Mobile Readiness","description":"Validates mobile viewport, responsive content, and touch-friendly layout signals for future-ready accessibility quality signals aligned with WCAG 3 direction. Evidence should include viewport and responsive asset evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Mobile Readiness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the mobile readiness evidence for wcag 3 exploratory readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag3-13","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag3","future-standard","w3c","mobile-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-wcag3 check:13","humanCommand":"Assess readiness and evidence quality aligned with WCAG 3 evolution; review the mobile-readiness evidence dimension for WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag3-14","testId":"ni-wai-wcag3-14","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Performance Budget","description":"Validates performance budget compliance using measured or bounded deterministic inputs for future-ready accessibility quality signals aligned with WCAG 3 direction. Evidence should include timing, byte, and Lighthouse-derived evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Performance Budget appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the performance budget evidence for wcag 3 exploratory readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag3-14","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag3","future-standard","w3c","performance-budget","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-wcag3 check:14","humanCommand":"Assess readiness and evidence quality aligned with WCAG 3 evolution; review the performance-budget evidence dimension for WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag3-15","testId":"ni-wai-wcag3-15","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Resource Efficiency","description":"Validates resource size, script/style count, and optimization opportunity signals for future-ready accessibility quality signals aligned with WCAG 3 direction. Evidence should include resource and markup evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Resource Efficiency appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the resource efficiency evidence for wcag 3 exploratory readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag3-15","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag3","future-standard","w3c","resource-efficiency","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-wcag3 check:15","humanCommand":"Assess readiness and evidence quality aligned with WCAG 3 evolution; review the resource-efficiency evidence dimension for WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag3-16","testId":"ni-wai-wcag3-16","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Cache Freshness","description":"Validates cache behavior, freshness hints, and stale-content risk for future-ready accessibility quality signals aligned with WCAG 3 direction. Evidence should include HTTP cache and timestamp evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Cache Freshness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the cache freshness evidence for wcag 3 exploratory readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag3-16","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag3","future-standard","w3c","cache-freshness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-wcag3 check:16","humanCommand":"Assess readiness and evidence quality aligned with WCAG 3 evolution; review the cache-freshness evidence dimension for WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag3-17","testId":"ni-wai-wcag3-17","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Route Reliability","description":"Validates route reliability, redirect safety, and dead-link risk for future-ready accessibility quality signals aligned with WCAG 3 direction. Evidence should include status, redirect, and sitemap evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Route Reliability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the route reliability evidence for wcag 3 exploratory readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag3-17","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag3","future-standard","w3c","route-reliability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-wcag3 check:17","humanCommand":"Assess readiness and evidence quality aligned with WCAG 3 evolution; review the route-reliability evidence dimension for WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag3-18","testId":"ni-wai-wcag3-18","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Feed Quality","description":"Validates RSS/Atom/feed usefulness, parseability, and freshness for future-ready accessibility quality signals aligned with WCAG 3 direction. Evidence should include feed XML and item evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Feed Quality appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the feed quality evidence for wcag 3 exploratory readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag3-18","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag3","future-standard","w3c","feed-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-wcag3 check:18","humanCommand":"Assess readiness and evidence quality aligned with WCAG 3 evolution; review the feed-quality evidence dimension for WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag3-19","testId":"ni-wai-wcag3-19","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Sitemap Quality","description":"Validates sitemap validity, public-safe URL coverage, and no-dead-link policy for future-ready accessibility quality signals aligned with WCAG 3 direction. Evidence should include sitemap XML and bounded link-check evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Sitemap Quality appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the sitemap quality evidence for wcag 3 exploratory readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag3-19","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag3","future-standard","w3c","sitemap-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-wcag3 check:19","humanCommand":"Assess readiness and evidence quality aligned with WCAG 3 evolution; review the sitemap-quality evidence dimension for WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag3-20","testId":"ni-wai-wcag3-20","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Robots Alignment","description":"Validates robots.txt alignment with public/protected policy and sitemap discovery for future-ready accessibility quality signals aligned with WCAG 3 direction. Evidence should include robots directives and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Robots Alignment appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the robots alignment evidence for wcag 3 exploratory readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag3-20","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag3","future-standard","w3c","robots-alignment","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-wcag3 check:20","humanCommand":"Assess readiness and evidence quality aligned with WCAG 3 evolution; review the robots-alignment evidence dimension for WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag3-21","testId":"ni-wai-wcag3-21","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Llms Structure","description":"Validates llms.txt structure, readability, endpoint coverage, and agent usefulness for future-ready accessibility quality signals aligned with WCAG 3 direction. Evidence should include plain-text section and line-length evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Llms Structure appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms structure evidence for wcag 3 exploratory readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag3-21","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag3","future-standard","w3c","llms-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-wcag3 check:21","humanCommand":"Assess readiness and evidence quality aligned with WCAG 3 evolution; review the llms-structure evidence dimension for WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag3-22","testId":"ni-wai-wcag3-22","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Llms Index Schema","description":"Validates llms-index JSON schema shape and count reconciliation for future-ready accessibility quality signals aligned with WCAG 3 direction. Evidence should include JSON keys, counts, and endpoint evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Llms Index Schema appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms index schema evidence for wcag 3 exploratory readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag3-22","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag3","future-standard","w3c","llms-index-schema","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-wcag3 check:22","humanCommand":"Assess readiness and evidence quality aligned with WCAG 3 evolution; review the llms-index-schema evidence dimension for WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag3-23","testId":"ni-wai-wcag3-23","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Humans Attribution","description":"Validates humans.txt attribution, maintainer, technology, and governance transparency for future-ready accessibility quality signals aligned with WCAG 3 direction. Evidence should include humans.txt section evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Humans Attribution appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the humans attribution evidence for wcag 3 exploratory readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag3-23","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag3","future-standard","w3c","humans-attribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-wcag3 check:23","humanCommand":"Assess readiness and evidence quality aligned with WCAG 3 evolution; review the humans-attribution evidence dimension for WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag3-24","testId":"ni-wai-wcag3-24","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Agent Policy","description":"Validates agent-policy JSON clarity for allowed, disallowed, and protected operations for future-ready accessibility quality signals aligned with WCAG 3 direction. Evidence should include well-known policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Agent Policy appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the agent policy evidence for wcag 3 exploratory readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag3-24","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag3","future-standard","w3c","agent-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-wcag3 check:24","humanCommand":"Assess readiness and evidence quality aligned with WCAG 3 evolution; review the agent-policy evidence dimension for WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag3-25","testId":"ni-wai-wcag3-25","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Ai Policy","description":"Validates AI policy clarity for training, search, answer use, caching, and attribution for future-ready accessibility quality signals aligned with WCAG 3 direction. Evidence should include well-known AI policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Ai Policy appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ai policy evidence for wcag 3 exploratory readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag3-25","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag3","future-standard","w3c","ai-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-wcag3 check:25","humanCommand":"Assess readiness and evidence quality aligned with WCAG 3 evolution; review the ai-policy evidence dimension for WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag3-26","testId":"ni-wai-wcag3-26","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Trust Policy","description":"Validates trust policy coverage for privacy, traceability, metadata, and protected actions for future-ready accessibility quality signals aligned with WCAG 3 direction. Evidence should include trust.json evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Trust Policy appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the trust policy evidence for wcag 3 exploratory readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag3-26","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag3","future-standard","w3c","trust-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-wcag3 check:26","humanCommand":"Assess readiness and evidence quality aligned with WCAG 3 evolution; review the trust-policy evidence dimension for WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag3-27","testId":"ni-wai-wcag3-27","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Openapi Contract","description":"Validates OpenAPI availability, server URL accuracy, schemas, and auth policy for future-ready accessibility quality signals aligned with WCAG 3 direction. Evidence should include OpenAPI text/JSON evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Openapi Contract appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the openapi contract evidence for wcag 3 exploratory readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag3-27","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag3","future-standard","w3c","openapi-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-wcag3 check:27","humanCommand":"Assess readiness and evidence quality aligned with WCAG 3 evolution; review the openapi-contract evidence dimension for WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag3-28","testId":"ni-wai-wcag3-28","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Mcp Contract","description":"Validates MCP JSON-RPC introspection, real tools, resources, and protected boundaries for future-ready accessibility quality signals aligned with WCAG 3 direction. Evidence should include MCP manifest and initialize evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Mcp Contract appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the mcp contract evidence for wcag 3 exploratory readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag3-28","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag3","future-standard","w3c","mcp-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-wcag3 check:28","humanCommand":"Assess readiness and evidence quality aligned with WCAG 3 evolution; review the mcp-contract evidence dimension for WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag3-29","testId":"ni-wai-wcag3-29","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Api Error Shape","description":"Validates API success/error response shape consistency for future-ready accessibility quality signals aligned with WCAG 3 direction. Evidence should include REST envelope evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Api Error Shape appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the api error shape evidence for wcag 3 exploratory readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag3-29","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag3","future-standard","w3c","api-error-shape","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-wcag3 check:29","humanCommand":"Assess readiness and evidence quality aligned with WCAG 3 evolution; review the api-error-shape evidence dimension for WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag3-30","testId":"ni-wai-wcag3-30","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Traceability","description":"Validates trace propagation, request IDs, and safe observability correlation for future-ready accessibility quality signals aligned with WCAG 3 direction. Evidence should include trace header and metadata evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Traceability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the traceability evidence for wcag 3 exploratory readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag3-30","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag3","future-standard","w3c","traceability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-wcag3 check:30","humanCommand":"Assess readiness and evidence quality aligned with WCAG 3 evolution; review the traceability evidence dimension for WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag3-31","testId":"ni-wai-wcag3-31","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Ja4 Redaction","description":"Validates fingerprint-adjacent metadata redaction and non-public raw JA4 handling for future-ready accessibility quality signals aligned with WCAG 3 direction. Evidence should include metadata policy and redaction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Ja4 Redaction appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the ja4 redaction evidence for wcag 3 exploratory readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag3-31","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag3","future-standard","w3c","ja4-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-wcag3 check:31","humanCommand":"Assess readiness and evidence quality aligned with WCAG 3 evolution; review the ja4-redaction evidence dimension for WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag3-32","testId":"ni-wai-wcag3-32","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Secret Redaction","description":"Validates absence of secrets, generic key examples, cookies, and raw tokens in public outputs for future-ready accessibility quality signals aligned with WCAG 3 direction. Evidence should include public artifact scan evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Secret Redaction appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the secret redaction evidence for wcag 3 exploratory readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag3-32","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag3","future-standard","w3c","secret-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-wcag3 check:32","humanCommand":"Assess readiness and evidence quality aligned with WCAG 3 evolution; review the secret-redaction evidence dimension for WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag3-33","testId":"ni-wai-wcag3-33","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Security Headers","description":"Validates security header coverage and hardened transport signals for future-ready accessibility quality signals aligned with WCAG 3 direction. Evidence should include HTTP header evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Security Headers appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the security headers evidence for wcag 3 exploratory readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag3-33","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag3","future-standard","w3c","security-headers","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-wcag3 check:33","humanCommand":"Assess readiness and evidence quality aligned with WCAG 3 evolution; review the security-headers evidence dimension for WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag3-34","testId":"ni-wai-wcag3-34","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Privacy Consent","description":"Validates privacy policy, consent, attribution, and data-use disclosure quality for future-ready accessibility quality signals aligned with WCAG 3 direction. Evidence should include public page and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Privacy Consent appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the privacy consent evidence for wcag 3 exploratory readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag3-34","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag3","future-standard","w3c","privacy-consent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-wcag3 check:34","humanCommand":"Assess readiness and evidence quality aligned with WCAG 3 evolution; review the privacy-consent evidence dimension for WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag3-35","testId":"ni-wai-wcag3-35","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Structured Data","description":"Validates JSON-LD and entity modeling for machine interpretation for future-ready accessibility quality signals aligned with WCAG 3 direction. Evidence should include schema block and parse evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Structured Data appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the structured data evidence for wcag 3 exploratory readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag3-35","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag3","future-standard","w3c","structured-data","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-wcag3 check:35","humanCommand":"Assess readiness and evidence quality aligned with WCAG 3 evolution; review the structured-data evidence dimension for WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag3-36","testId":"ni-wai-wcag3-36","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Social Preview","description":"Validates Open Graph and Twitter/X card readiness for public sharing for future-ready accessibility quality signals aligned with WCAG 3 direction. Evidence should include meta tag evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Social Preview appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the social preview evidence for wcag 3 exploratory readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag3-36","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag3","future-standard","w3c","social-preview","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-wcag3 check:36","humanCommand":"Assess readiness and evidence quality aligned with WCAG 3 evolution; review the social-preview evidence dimension for WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag3-37","testId":"ni-wai-wcag3-37","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: I18n Routing","description":"Validates locale route, hreflang, language declaration, and translation readiness for future-ready accessibility quality signals aligned with WCAG 3 direction. Evidence should include lang/hreflang and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: I18n Routing appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the i18n routing evidence for wcag 3 exploratory readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag3-37","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag3","future-standard","w3c","i18n-routing","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-wcag3 check:37","humanCommand":"Assess readiness and evidence quality aligned with WCAG 3 evolution; review the i18n-routing evidence dimension for WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag3-38","testId":"ni-wai-wcag3-38","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Readability","description":"Validates human readability, sectioning, sentence complexity, and comprehension support for future-ready accessibility quality signals aligned with WCAG 3 direction. Evidence should include extracted content evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Readability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the readability evidence for wcag 3 exploratory readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag3-38","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag3","future-standard","w3c","readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-wcag3 check:38","humanCommand":"Assess readiness and evidence quality aligned with WCAG 3 evolution; review the readability evidence dimension for WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag3-39","testId":"ni-wai-wcag3-39","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Content Utility","description":"Validates non-placeholder content usefulness and domain-specific public value for future-ready accessibility quality signals aligned with WCAG 3 direction. Evidence should include content extraction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Content Utility appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the content utility evidence for wcag 3 exploratory readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag3-39","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag3","future-standard","w3c","content-utility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-wcag3 check:39","humanCommand":"Assess readiness and evidence quality aligned with WCAG 3 evolution; review the content-utility evidence dimension for WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag3-40","testId":"ni-wai-wcag3-40","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Recommendation Grounding","description":"Validates recommendation grounding in deterministic evidence instead of fabricated model output for future-ready accessibility quality signals aligned with WCAG 3 direction. Evidence should include issue and remediation evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Recommendation Grounding appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the recommendation grounding evidence for wcag 3 exploratory readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag3-40","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag3","future-standard","w3c","recommendation-grounding","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-wcag3 check:40","humanCommand":"Assess readiness and evidence quality aligned with WCAG 3 evolution; review the recommendation-grounding evidence dimension for WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag3-41","testId":"ni-wai-wcag3-41","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Evidence Quality","description":"Validates evidence completeness, public safety, and reproducibility for future-ready accessibility quality signals aligned with WCAG 3 direction. Evidence should include test output and artifact evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Evidence Quality appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the evidence quality evidence for wcag 3 exploratory readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag3-41","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag3","future-standard","w3c","evidence-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-wcag3 check:41","humanCommand":"Assess readiness and evidence quality aligned with WCAG 3 evolution; review the evidence-quality evidence dimension for WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag3-42","testId":"ni-wai-wcag3-42","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Threshold Policy","description":"Validates threshold clarity, pass/warn/fail semantics, and scoring transparency for future-ready accessibility quality signals aligned with WCAG 3 direction. Evidence should include threshold and result status evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Threshold Policy appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the threshold policy evidence for wcag 3 exploratory readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag3-42","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag3","future-standard","w3c","threshold-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-wcag3 check:42","humanCommand":"Assess readiness and evidence quality aligned with WCAG 3 evolution; review the threshold-policy evidence dimension for WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag3-43","testId":"ni-wai-wcag3-43","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Confidence","description":"Validates confidence scoring and degraded-input disclosure for future-ready accessibility quality signals aligned with WCAG 3 direction. Evidence should include source freshness and input availability evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Confidence appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the confidence evidence for wcag 3 exploratory readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag3-43","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag3","future-standard","w3c","confidence","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-wcag3 check:43","humanCommand":"Assess readiness and evidence quality aligned with WCAG 3 evolution; review the confidence evidence dimension for WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag3-44","testId":"ni-wai-wcag3-44","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Trend Readiness","description":"Validates historical comparability and timeline readiness for future reruns for future-ready accessibility quality signals aligned with WCAG 3 direction. Evidence should include analysis ID, timestamp, and persistence evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Trend Readiness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the trend readiness evidence for wcag 3 exploratory readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag3-44","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag3","future-standard","w3c","trend-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-wcag3 check:44","humanCommand":"Assess readiness and evidence quality aligned with WCAG 3 evolution; review the trend-readiness evidence dimension for WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag3-45","testId":"ni-wai-wcag3-45","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Ranking Readiness","description":"Validates ranking input completeness and profile compatibility for future-ready accessibility quality signals aligned with WCAG 3 direction. Evidence should include score and profile evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Ranking Readiness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ranking readiness evidence for wcag 3 exploratory readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag3-45","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag3","future-standard","w3c","ranking-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-wcag3 check:45","humanCommand":"Assess readiness and evidence quality aligned with WCAG 3 evolution; review the ranking-readiness evidence dimension for WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag3-46","testId":"ni-wai-wcag3-46","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Network Contribution","description":"Validates PlatPhorm network contribution through discovery, integrations, and standards compliance for future-ready accessibility quality signals aligned with WCAG 3 direction. Evidence should include network graph and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Network Contribution appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the network contribution evidence for wcag 3 exploratory readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag3-46","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag3","future-standard","w3c","network-contribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-wcag3 check:46","humanCommand":"Assess readiness and evidence quality aligned with WCAG 3 evolution; review the network-contribution evidence dimension for WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag3-47","testId":"ni-wai-wcag3-47","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Report Readiness","description":"Validates report/export categorization with public-safe evidence and protected boundaries for future-ready accessibility quality signals aligned with WCAG 3 direction. Evidence should include report section mapping evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Report Readiness appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the report readiness evidence for wcag 3 exploratory readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag3-47","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag3","future-standard","w3c","report-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-wcag3 check:47","humanCommand":"Assess readiness and evidence quality aligned with WCAG 3 evolution; review the report-readiness evidence dimension for WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag3-48","testId":"ni-wai-wcag3-48","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Operator Actionability","description":"Validates clear remediation, owner action, difficulty, and retest path for future-ready accessibility quality signals aligned with WCAG 3 direction. Evidence should include fix instructions and command evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Operator Actionability appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the operator actionability evidence for wcag 3 exploratory readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag3-48","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag3","future-standard","w3c","operator-actionability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-wcag3 check:48","humanCommand":"Assess readiness and evidence quality aligned with WCAG 3 evolution; review the operator-actionability evidence dimension for WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag3-49","testId":"ni-wai-wcag3-49","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Degraded State","description":"Validates honest degraded, unavailable, skipped, and not-applicable states for future-ready accessibility quality signals aligned with WCAG 3 direction. Evidence should include status and storage evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Degraded State appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the degraded state evidence for wcag 3 exploratory readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag3-49","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag3","future-standard","w3c","degraded-state","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-wcag3 check:49","humanCommand":"Assess readiness and evidence quality aligned with WCAG 3 evolution; review the degraded-state evidence dimension for WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-wai-wcag3-50","testId":"ni-wai-wcag3-50","suiteId":"accessibility","suiteName":"Accessibility","phase2Dimensions":["accessibility","mobile-responsive","trust-privacy"],"name":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Reproducibility","description":"Validates stable CLI/API/human reproduction path and deterministic rerun instructions for future-ready accessibility quality signals aligned with WCAG 3 direction. Evidence should include commands and registry version evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"accessibility-inclusion","reportSectionName":"Accessibility and Inclusion","reportingCategory":"Accessibility and Inclusion / Accessibility","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness: Reproducibility appears in the Accessibility and Inclusion report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the reproducibility evidence for wcag 3 exploratory readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-wai-wcag3-50","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["accessibility","wcag3","future-standard","w3c","reproducibility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx axe https://example.com --exit # group:wai-wcag3 check:50","humanCommand":"Assess readiness and evidence quality aligned with WCAG 3 evolution; review the reproducibility evidence dimension for WCAG 3 Exploratory Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-i18n-01","testId":"ni-i18n-01","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Internationalization Integrity: Availability","description":"Validates public route availability and successful bounded fetch behavior for i18n readiness, locale routing, language metadata, and translation coverage. Evidence should include HTTP status, timeout, and redirect evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Internationalization Integrity: Availability appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the availability evidence for internationalization integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-i18n-01","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["i18n","localization","language","quality","availability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(/hreflang|lang=/.test(html)?'ok':'missing'))\" # group:i18n check:1","humanCommand":"Verify locale alternates and translated routes for all supported locales; review the availability evidence dimension for Internationalization Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-i18n-02","testId":"ni-i18n-02","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Internationalization Integrity: Public Safety","description":"Validates public-safe access boundaries without exposing private or protected data for i18n readiness, locale routing, language metadata, and translation coverage. Evidence should include route policy and response-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Internationalization Integrity: Public Safety appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the public safety evidence for internationalization integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-i18n-02","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["i18n","localization","language","quality","public-safety","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(/hreflang|lang=/.test(html)?'ok':'missing'))\" # group:i18n check:2","humanCommand":"Verify locale alternates and translated routes for all supported locales; review the public-safety evidence dimension for Internationalization Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-i18n-03","testId":"ni-i18n-03","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Internationalization Integrity: Canonical Url","description":"Validates canonical URL stability and normalized route identity for i18n readiness, locale routing, language metadata, and translation coverage. Evidence should include canonical tags, redirects, and normalized URL evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Internationalization Integrity: Canonical Url appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the canonical url evidence for internationalization integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-i18n-03","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["i18n","localization","language","quality","canonical-url","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(/hreflang|lang=/.test(html)?'ok':'missing'))\" # group:i18n check:3","humanCommand":"Verify locale alternates and translated routes for all supported locales; review the canonical-url evidence dimension for Internationalization Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-i18n-04","testId":"ni-i18n-04","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Internationalization Integrity: Metadata Clarity","description":"Validates title, description, and page-specific metadata clarity for i18n readiness, locale routing, language metadata, and translation coverage. Evidence should include HTML metadata and extracted text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Internationalization Integrity: Metadata Clarity appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the metadata clarity evidence for internationalization integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-i18n-04","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["i18n","localization","language","quality","metadata-clarity","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(/hreflang|lang=/.test(html)?'ok':'missing'))\" # group:i18n check:4","humanCommand":"Verify locale alternates and translated routes for all supported locales; review the metadata-clarity evidence dimension for Internationalization Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-i18n-05","testId":"ni-i18n-05","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Internationalization Integrity: Semantic Structure","description":"Validates semantic HTML structure for humans, agents, and assistive technology for i18n readiness, locale routing, language metadata, and translation coverage. Evidence should include heading, landmark, and element evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Internationalization Integrity: Semantic Structure appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the semantic structure evidence for internationalization integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-i18n-05","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["i18n","localization","language","quality","semantic-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(/hreflang|lang=/.test(html)?'ok':'missing'))\" # group:i18n check:5","humanCommand":"Verify locale alternates and translated routes for all supported locales; review the semantic-structure evidence dimension for Internationalization Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-i18n-06","testId":"ni-i18n-06","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Internationalization Integrity: Machine Readability","description":"Validates machine-readable public content and predictable parsing surfaces for i18n readiness, locale routing, language metadata, and translation coverage. Evidence should include structured tags, JSON-LD, and document-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Internationalization Integrity: Machine Readability appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the machine readability evidence for internationalization integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-i18n-06","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["i18n","localization","language","quality","machine-readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(/hreflang|lang=/.test(html)?'ok':'missing'))\" # group:i18n check:6","humanCommand":"Verify locale alternates and translated routes for all supported locales; review the machine-readability evidence dimension for Internationalization Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-i18n-07","testId":"ni-i18n-07","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Internationalization Integrity: Agent Discovery","description":"Validates agent discovery hints and AI-readable policy/documentation signals for i18n readiness, locale routing, language metadata, and translation coverage. Evidence should include llms, policy, MCP, OpenAPI, or schema evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Internationalization Integrity: Agent Discovery appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the agent discovery evidence for internationalization integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-i18n-07","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["i18n","localization","language","quality","agent-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(/hreflang|lang=/.test(html)?'ok':'missing'))\" # group:i18n check:7","humanCommand":"Verify locale alternates and translated routes for all supported locales; review the agent-discovery evidence dimension for Internationalization Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-i18n-08","testId":"ni-i18n-08","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Internationalization Integrity: Crawler Discovery","description":"Validates crawler discovery paths through robots, sitemap, feeds, and canonical links for i18n readiness, locale routing, language metadata, and translation coverage. Evidence should include discovery artifact and link evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Internationalization Integrity: Crawler Discovery appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the crawler discovery evidence for internationalization integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-i18n-08","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["i18n","localization","language","quality","crawler-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(/hreflang|lang=/.test(html)?'ok':'missing'))\" # group:i18n check:8","humanCommand":"Verify locale alternates and translated routes for all supported locales; review the crawler-discovery evidence dimension for Internationalization Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-i18n-09","testId":"ni-i18n-09","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Internationalization Integrity: Answerability","description":"Validates direct answer extraction and quotable explanatory content for i18n readiness, locale routing, language metadata, and translation coverage. Evidence should include question, summary, heading, and paragraph evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Internationalization Integrity: Answerability appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the answerability evidence for internationalization integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-i18n-09","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["i18n","localization","language","quality","answerability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(/hreflang|lang=/.test(html)?'ok':'missing'))\" # group:i18n check:9","humanCommand":"Verify locale alternates and translated routes for all supported locales; review the answerability evidence dimension for Internationalization Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-i18n-10","testId":"ni-i18n-10","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Internationalization Integrity: Generative Context","description":"Validates GEO context quality for generative engines without inventing measured facts for i18n readiness, locale routing, language metadata, and translation coverage. Evidence should include entity, source, and instruction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Internationalization Integrity: Generative Context appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the generative context evidence for internationalization integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-i18n-10","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["i18n","localization","language","quality","generative-context","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(/hreflang|lang=/.test(html)?'ok':'missing'))\" # group:i18n check:10","humanCommand":"Verify locale alternates and translated routes for all supported locales; review the generative-context evidence dimension for Internationalization Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-i18n-11","testId":"ni-i18n-11","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Internationalization Integrity: Search Intent","description":"Validates search intent alignment and snippet-friendly content structure for i18n readiness, locale routing, language metadata, and translation coverage. Evidence should include metadata, headings, and topical text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Internationalization Integrity: Search Intent appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the search intent evidence for internationalization integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-i18n-11","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["i18n","localization","language","quality","search-intent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(/hreflang|lang=/.test(html)?'ok':'missing'))\" # group:i18n check:11","humanCommand":"Verify locale alternates and translated routes for all supported locales; review the search-intent evidence dimension for Internationalization Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-i18n-12","testId":"ni-i18n-12","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Internationalization Integrity: Accessibility Semantics","description":"Validates accessible names, relationships, landmarks, and keyboard-relevant structure for i18n readiness, locale routing, language metadata, and translation coverage. Evidence should include ARIA, labels, landmarks, and control evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Internationalization Integrity: Accessibility Semantics appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the accessibility semantics evidence for internationalization integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-i18n-12","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["i18n","localization","language","quality","accessibility-semantics","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(/hreflang|lang=/.test(html)?'ok':'missing'))\" # group:i18n check:12","humanCommand":"Verify locale alternates and translated routes for all supported locales; review the accessibility-semantics evidence dimension for Internationalization Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-i18n-13","testId":"ni-i18n-13","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Internationalization Integrity: Mobile Readiness","description":"Validates mobile viewport, responsive content, and touch-friendly layout signals for i18n readiness, locale routing, language metadata, and translation coverage. Evidence should include viewport and responsive asset evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Internationalization Integrity: Mobile Readiness appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the mobile readiness evidence for internationalization integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-i18n-13","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["i18n","localization","language","quality","mobile-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(/hreflang|lang=/.test(html)?'ok':'missing'))\" # group:i18n check:13","humanCommand":"Verify locale alternates and translated routes for all supported locales; review the mobile-readiness evidence dimension for Internationalization Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-i18n-14","testId":"ni-i18n-14","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Internationalization Integrity: Performance Budget","description":"Validates performance budget compliance using measured or bounded deterministic inputs for i18n readiness, locale routing, language metadata, and translation coverage. Evidence should include timing, byte, and Lighthouse-derived evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Internationalization Integrity: Performance Budget appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the performance budget evidence for internationalization integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-i18n-14","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["i18n","localization","language","quality","performance-budget","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(/hreflang|lang=/.test(html)?'ok':'missing'))\" # group:i18n check:14","humanCommand":"Verify locale alternates and translated routes for all supported locales; review the performance-budget evidence dimension for Internationalization Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-i18n-15","testId":"ni-i18n-15","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Internationalization Integrity: Resource Efficiency","description":"Validates resource size, script/style count, and optimization opportunity signals for i18n readiness, locale routing, language metadata, and translation coverage. Evidence should include resource and markup evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Internationalization Integrity: Resource Efficiency appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the resource efficiency evidence for internationalization integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-i18n-15","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["i18n","localization","language","quality","resource-efficiency","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(/hreflang|lang=/.test(html)?'ok':'missing'))\" # group:i18n check:15","humanCommand":"Verify locale alternates and translated routes for all supported locales; review the resource-efficiency evidence dimension for Internationalization Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-i18n-16","testId":"ni-i18n-16","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Internationalization Integrity: Cache Freshness","description":"Validates cache behavior, freshness hints, and stale-content risk for i18n readiness, locale routing, language metadata, and translation coverage. Evidence should include HTTP cache and timestamp evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Internationalization Integrity: Cache Freshness appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the cache freshness evidence for internationalization integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-i18n-16","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["i18n","localization","language","quality","cache-freshness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(/hreflang|lang=/.test(html)?'ok':'missing'))\" # group:i18n check:16","humanCommand":"Verify locale alternates and translated routes for all supported locales; review the cache-freshness evidence dimension for Internationalization Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-i18n-17","testId":"ni-i18n-17","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Internationalization Integrity: Route Reliability","description":"Validates route reliability, redirect safety, and dead-link risk for i18n readiness, locale routing, language metadata, and translation coverage. Evidence should include status, redirect, and sitemap evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Internationalization Integrity: Route Reliability appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the route reliability evidence for internationalization integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-i18n-17","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["i18n","localization","language","quality","route-reliability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(/hreflang|lang=/.test(html)?'ok':'missing'))\" # group:i18n check:17","humanCommand":"Verify locale alternates and translated routes for all supported locales; review the route-reliability evidence dimension for Internationalization Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-i18n-18","testId":"ni-i18n-18","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Internationalization Integrity: Feed Quality","description":"Validates RSS/Atom/feed usefulness, parseability, and freshness for i18n readiness, locale routing, language metadata, and translation coverage. Evidence should include feed XML and item evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Internationalization Integrity: Feed Quality appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the feed quality evidence for internationalization integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-i18n-18","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["i18n","localization","language","quality","feed-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(/hreflang|lang=/.test(html)?'ok':'missing'))\" # group:i18n check:18","humanCommand":"Verify locale alternates and translated routes for all supported locales; review the feed-quality evidence dimension for Internationalization Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-i18n-19","testId":"ni-i18n-19","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Internationalization Integrity: Sitemap Quality","description":"Validates sitemap validity, public-safe URL coverage, and no-dead-link policy for i18n readiness, locale routing, language metadata, and translation coverage. Evidence should include sitemap XML and bounded link-check evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Internationalization Integrity: Sitemap Quality appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the sitemap quality evidence for internationalization integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-i18n-19","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["i18n","localization","language","quality","sitemap-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(/hreflang|lang=/.test(html)?'ok':'missing'))\" # group:i18n check:19","humanCommand":"Verify locale alternates and translated routes for all supported locales; review the sitemap-quality evidence dimension for Internationalization Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-i18n-20","testId":"ni-i18n-20","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Internationalization Integrity: Robots Alignment","description":"Validates robots.txt alignment with public/protected policy and sitemap discovery for i18n readiness, locale routing, language metadata, and translation coverage. Evidence should include robots directives and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Internationalization Integrity: Robots Alignment appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the robots alignment evidence for internationalization integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-i18n-20","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["i18n","localization","language","quality","robots-alignment","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(/hreflang|lang=/.test(html)?'ok':'missing'))\" # group:i18n check:20","humanCommand":"Verify locale alternates and translated routes for all supported locales; review the robots-alignment evidence dimension for Internationalization Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-i18n-21","testId":"ni-i18n-21","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Internationalization Integrity: Llms Structure","description":"Validates llms.txt structure, readability, endpoint coverage, and agent usefulness for i18n readiness, locale routing, language metadata, and translation coverage. Evidence should include plain-text section and line-length evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Internationalization Integrity: Llms Structure appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms structure evidence for internationalization integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-i18n-21","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["i18n","localization","language","quality","llms-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(/hreflang|lang=/.test(html)?'ok':'missing'))\" # group:i18n check:21","humanCommand":"Verify locale alternates and translated routes for all supported locales; review the llms-structure evidence dimension for Internationalization Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-i18n-22","testId":"ni-i18n-22","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Internationalization Integrity: Llms Index Schema","description":"Validates llms-index JSON schema shape and count reconciliation for i18n readiness, locale routing, language metadata, and translation coverage. Evidence should include JSON keys, counts, and endpoint evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Internationalization Integrity: Llms Index Schema appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms index schema evidence for internationalization integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-i18n-22","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["i18n","localization","language","quality","llms-index-schema","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(/hreflang|lang=/.test(html)?'ok':'missing'))\" # group:i18n check:22","humanCommand":"Verify locale alternates and translated routes for all supported locales; review the llms-index-schema evidence dimension for Internationalization Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-i18n-23","testId":"ni-i18n-23","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Internationalization Integrity: Humans Attribution","description":"Validates humans.txt attribution, maintainer, technology, and governance transparency for i18n readiness, locale routing, language metadata, and translation coverage. Evidence should include humans.txt section evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Internationalization Integrity: Humans Attribution appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the humans attribution evidence for internationalization integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-i18n-23","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["i18n","localization","language","quality","humans-attribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(/hreflang|lang=/.test(html)?'ok':'missing'))\" # group:i18n check:23","humanCommand":"Verify locale alternates and translated routes for all supported locales; review the humans-attribution evidence dimension for Internationalization Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-i18n-24","testId":"ni-i18n-24","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Internationalization Integrity: Agent Policy","description":"Validates agent-policy JSON clarity for allowed, disallowed, and protected operations for i18n readiness, locale routing, language metadata, and translation coverage. Evidence should include well-known policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Internationalization Integrity: Agent Policy appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the agent policy evidence for internationalization integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-i18n-24","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["i18n","localization","language","quality","agent-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(/hreflang|lang=/.test(html)?'ok':'missing'))\" # group:i18n check:24","humanCommand":"Verify locale alternates and translated routes for all supported locales; review the agent-policy evidence dimension for Internationalization Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-i18n-25","testId":"ni-i18n-25","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Internationalization Integrity: Ai Policy","description":"Validates AI policy clarity for training, search, answer use, caching, and attribution for i18n readiness, locale routing, language metadata, and translation coverage. Evidence should include well-known AI policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Internationalization Integrity: Ai Policy appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ai policy evidence for internationalization integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-i18n-25","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["i18n","localization","language","quality","ai-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(/hreflang|lang=/.test(html)?'ok':'missing'))\" # group:i18n check:25","humanCommand":"Verify locale alternates and translated routes for all supported locales; review the ai-policy evidence dimension for Internationalization Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-i18n-26","testId":"ni-i18n-26","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Internationalization Integrity: Trust Policy","description":"Validates trust policy coverage for privacy, traceability, metadata, and protected actions for i18n readiness, locale routing, language metadata, and translation coverage. Evidence should include trust.json evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Internationalization Integrity: Trust Policy appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the trust policy evidence for internationalization integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-i18n-26","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["i18n","localization","language","quality","trust-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(/hreflang|lang=/.test(html)?'ok':'missing'))\" # group:i18n check:26","humanCommand":"Verify locale alternates and translated routes for all supported locales; review the trust-policy evidence dimension for Internationalization Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-i18n-27","testId":"ni-i18n-27","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Internationalization Integrity: Openapi Contract","description":"Validates OpenAPI availability, server URL accuracy, schemas, and auth policy for i18n readiness, locale routing, language metadata, and translation coverage. Evidence should include OpenAPI text/JSON evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Internationalization Integrity: Openapi Contract appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the openapi contract evidence for internationalization integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-i18n-27","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["i18n","localization","language","quality","openapi-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(/hreflang|lang=/.test(html)?'ok':'missing'))\" # group:i18n check:27","humanCommand":"Verify locale alternates and translated routes for all supported locales; review the openapi-contract evidence dimension for Internationalization Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-i18n-28","testId":"ni-i18n-28","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Internationalization Integrity: Mcp Contract","description":"Validates MCP JSON-RPC introspection, real tools, resources, and protected boundaries for i18n readiness, locale routing, language metadata, and translation coverage. Evidence should include MCP manifest and initialize evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Internationalization Integrity: Mcp Contract appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the mcp contract evidence for internationalization integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-i18n-28","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["i18n","localization","language","quality","mcp-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(/hreflang|lang=/.test(html)?'ok':'missing'))\" # group:i18n check:28","humanCommand":"Verify locale alternates and translated routes for all supported locales; review the mcp-contract evidence dimension for Internationalization Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-i18n-29","testId":"ni-i18n-29","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Internationalization Integrity: Api Error Shape","description":"Validates API success/error response shape consistency for i18n readiness, locale routing, language metadata, and translation coverage. Evidence should include REST envelope evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Internationalization Integrity: Api Error Shape appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the api error shape evidence for internationalization integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-i18n-29","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["i18n","localization","language","quality","api-error-shape","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(/hreflang|lang=/.test(html)?'ok':'missing'))\" # group:i18n check:29","humanCommand":"Verify locale alternates and translated routes for all supported locales; review the api-error-shape evidence dimension for Internationalization Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-i18n-30","testId":"ni-i18n-30","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Internationalization Integrity: Traceability","description":"Validates trace propagation, request IDs, and safe observability correlation for i18n readiness, locale routing, language metadata, and translation coverage. Evidence should include trace header and metadata evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Internationalization Integrity: Traceability appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the traceability evidence for internationalization integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-i18n-30","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["i18n","localization","language","quality","traceability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(/hreflang|lang=/.test(html)?'ok':'missing'))\" # group:i18n check:30","humanCommand":"Verify locale alternates and translated routes for all supported locales; review the traceability evidence dimension for Internationalization Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-i18n-31","testId":"ni-i18n-31","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Internationalization Integrity: Ja4 Redaction","description":"Validates fingerprint-adjacent metadata redaction and non-public raw JA4 handling for i18n readiness, locale routing, language metadata, and translation coverage. Evidence should include metadata policy and redaction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Internationalization Integrity: Ja4 Redaction appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the ja4 redaction evidence for internationalization integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-i18n-31","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["i18n","localization","language","quality","ja4-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(/hreflang|lang=/.test(html)?'ok':'missing'))\" # group:i18n check:31","humanCommand":"Verify locale alternates and translated routes for all supported locales; review the ja4-redaction evidence dimension for Internationalization Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-i18n-32","testId":"ni-i18n-32","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Internationalization Integrity: Secret Redaction","description":"Validates absence of secrets, generic key examples, cookies, and raw tokens in public outputs for i18n readiness, locale routing, language metadata, and translation coverage. Evidence should include public artifact scan evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Internationalization Integrity: Secret Redaction appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the secret redaction evidence for internationalization integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-i18n-32","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["i18n","localization","language","quality","secret-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(/hreflang|lang=/.test(html)?'ok':'missing'))\" # group:i18n check:32","humanCommand":"Verify locale alternates and translated routes for all supported locales; review the secret-redaction evidence dimension for Internationalization Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-i18n-33","testId":"ni-i18n-33","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Internationalization Integrity: Security Headers","description":"Validates security header coverage and hardened transport signals for i18n readiness, locale routing, language metadata, and translation coverage. Evidence should include HTTP header evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Internationalization Integrity: Security Headers appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the security headers evidence for internationalization integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-i18n-33","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["i18n","localization","language","quality","security-headers","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(/hreflang|lang=/.test(html)?'ok':'missing'))\" # group:i18n check:33","humanCommand":"Verify locale alternates and translated routes for all supported locales; review the security-headers evidence dimension for Internationalization Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-i18n-34","testId":"ni-i18n-34","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Internationalization Integrity: Privacy Consent","description":"Validates privacy policy, consent, attribution, and data-use disclosure quality for i18n readiness, locale routing, language metadata, and translation coverage. Evidence should include public page and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Internationalization Integrity: Privacy Consent appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the privacy consent evidence for internationalization integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-i18n-34","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["i18n","localization","language","quality","privacy-consent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(/hreflang|lang=/.test(html)?'ok':'missing'))\" # group:i18n check:34","humanCommand":"Verify locale alternates and translated routes for all supported locales; review the privacy-consent evidence dimension for Internationalization Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-i18n-35","testId":"ni-i18n-35","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Internationalization Integrity: Structured Data","description":"Validates JSON-LD and entity modeling for machine interpretation for i18n readiness, locale routing, language metadata, and translation coverage. Evidence should include schema block and parse evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Internationalization Integrity: Structured Data appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the structured data evidence for internationalization integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-i18n-35","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["i18n","localization","language","quality","structured-data","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(/hreflang|lang=/.test(html)?'ok':'missing'))\" # group:i18n check:35","humanCommand":"Verify locale alternates and translated routes for all supported locales; review the structured-data evidence dimension for Internationalization Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-i18n-36","testId":"ni-i18n-36","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Internationalization Integrity: Social Preview","description":"Validates Open Graph and Twitter/X card readiness for public sharing for i18n readiness, locale routing, language metadata, and translation coverage. Evidence should include meta tag evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Internationalization Integrity: Social Preview appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the social preview evidence for internationalization integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-i18n-36","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["i18n","localization","language","quality","social-preview","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(/hreflang|lang=/.test(html)?'ok':'missing'))\" # group:i18n check:36","humanCommand":"Verify locale alternates and translated routes for all supported locales; review the social-preview evidence dimension for Internationalization Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-i18n-37","testId":"ni-i18n-37","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Internationalization Integrity: I18n Routing","description":"Validates locale route, hreflang, language declaration, and translation readiness for i18n readiness, locale routing, language metadata, and translation coverage. Evidence should include lang/hreflang and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Internationalization Integrity: I18n Routing appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the i18n routing evidence for internationalization integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-i18n-37","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["i18n","localization","language","quality","i18n-routing","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(/hreflang|lang=/.test(html)?'ok':'missing'))\" # group:i18n check:37","humanCommand":"Verify locale alternates and translated routes for all supported locales; review the i18n-routing evidence dimension for Internationalization Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-i18n-38","testId":"ni-i18n-38","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Internationalization Integrity: Readability","description":"Validates human readability, sectioning, sentence complexity, and comprehension support for i18n readiness, locale routing, language metadata, and translation coverage. Evidence should include extracted content evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Internationalization Integrity: Readability appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the readability evidence for internationalization integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-i18n-38","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["i18n","localization","language","quality","readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(/hreflang|lang=/.test(html)?'ok':'missing'))\" # group:i18n check:38","humanCommand":"Verify locale alternates and translated routes for all supported locales; review the readability evidence dimension for Internationalization Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-i18n-39","testId":"ni-i18n-39","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Internationalization Integrity: Content Utility","description":"Validates non-placeholder content usefulness and domain-specific public value for i18n readiness, locale routing, language metadata, and translation coverage. Evidence should include content extraction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Internationalization Integrity: Content Utility appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the content utility evidence for internationalization integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-i18n-39","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["i18n","localization","language","quality","content-utility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(/hreflang|lang=/.test(html)?'ok':'missing'))\" # group:i18n check:39","humanCommand":"Verify locale alternates and translated routes for all supported locales; review the content-utility evidence dimension for Internationalization Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-i18n-40","testId":"ni-i18n-40","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Internationalization Integrity: Recommendation Grounding","description":"Validates recommendation grounding in deterministic evidence instead of fabricated model output for i18n readiness, locale routing, language metadata, and translation coverage. Evidence should include issue and remediation evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Internationalization Integrity: Recommendation Grounding appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the recommendation grounding evidence for internationalization integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-i18n-40","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["i18n","localization","language","quality","recommendation-grounding","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(/hreflang|lang=/.test(html)?'ok':'missing'))\" # group:i18n check:40","humanCommand":"Verify locale alternates and translated routes for all supported locales; review the recommendation-grounding evidence dimension for Internationalization Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-i18n-41","testId":"ni-i18n-41","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Internationalization Integrity: Evidence Quality","description":"Validates evidence completeness, public safety, and reproducibility for i18n readiness, locale routing, language metadata, and translation coverage. Evidence should include test output and artifact evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Internationalization Integrity: Evidence Quality appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the evidence quality evidence for internationalization integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-i18n-41","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["i18n","localization","language","quality","evidence-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(/hreflang|lang=/.test(html)?'ok':'missing'))\" # group:i18n check:41","humanCommand":"Verify locale alternates and translated routes for all supported locales; review the evidence-quality evidence dimension for Internationalization Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-i18n-42","testId":"ni-i18n-42","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Internationalization Integrity: Threshold Policy","description":"Validates threshold clarity, pass/warn/fail semantics, and scoring transparency for i18n readiness, locale routing, language metadata, and translation coverage. Evidence should include threshold and result status evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Internationalization Integrity: Threshold Policy appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the threshold policy evidence for internationalization integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-i18n-42","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["i18n","localization","language","quality","threshold-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(/hreflang|lang=/.test(html)?'ok':'missing'))\" # group:i18n check:42","humanCommand":"Verify locale alternates and translated routes for all supported locales; review the threshold-policy evidence dimension for Internationalization Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-i18n-43","testId":"ni-i18n-43","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Internationalization Integrity: Confidence","description":"Validates confidence scoring and degraded-input disclosure for i18n readiness, locale routing, language metadata, and translation coverage. Evidence should include source freshness and input availability evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Internationalization Integrity: Confidence appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the confidence evidence for internationalization integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-i18n-43","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["i18n","localization","language","quality","confidence","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(/hreflang|lang=/.test(html)?'ok':'missing'))\" # group:i18n check:43","humanCommand":"Verify locale alternates and translated routes for all supported locales; review the confidence evidence dimension for Internationalization Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-i18n-44","testId":"ni-i18n-44","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Internationalization Integrity: Trend Readiness","description":"Validates historical comparability and timeline readiness for future reruns for i18n readiness, locale routing, language metadata, and translation coverage. Evidence should include analysis ID, timestamp, and persistence evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Internationalization Integrity: Trend Readiness appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the trend readiness evidence for internationalization integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-i18n-44","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["i18n","localization","language","quality","trend-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(/hreflang|lang=/.test(html)?'ok':'missing'))\" # group:i18n check:44","humanCommand":"Verify locale alternates and translated routes for all supported locales; review the trend-readiness evidence dimension for Internationalization Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-i18n-45","testId":"ni-i18n-45","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Internationalization Integrity: Ranking Readiness","description":"Validates ranking input completeness and profile compatibility for i18n readiness, locale routing, language metadata, and translation coverage. Evidence should include score and profile evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Internationalization Integrity: Ranking Readiness appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ranking readiness evidence for internationalization integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-i18n-45","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["i18n","localization","language","quality","ranking-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(/hreflang|lang=/.test(html)?'ok':'missing'))\" # group:i18n check:45","humanCommand":"Verify locale alternates and translated routes for all supported locales; review the ranking-readiness evidence dimension for Internationalization Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-i18n-46","testId":"ni-i18n-46","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Internationalization Integrity: Network Contribution","description":"Validates PlatPhorm network contribution through discovery, integrations, and standards compliance for i18n readiness, locale routing, language metadata, and translation coverage. Evidence should include network graph and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Internationalization Integrity: Network Contribution appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the network contribution evidence for internationalization integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-i18n-46","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["i18n","localization","language","quality","network-contribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(/hreflang|lang=/.test(html)?'ok':'missing'))\" # group:i18n check:46","humanCommand":"Verify locale alternates and translated routes for all supported locales; review the network-contribution evidence dimension for Internationalization Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-i18n-47","testId":"ni-i18n-47","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Internationalization Integrity: Report Readiness","description":"Validates report/export categorization with public-safe evidence and protected boundaries for i18n readiness, locale routing, language metadata, and translation coverage. Evidence should include report section mapping evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Internationalization Integrity: Report Readiness appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the report readiness evidence for internationalization integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-i18n-47","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["i18n","localization","language","quality","report-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(/hreflang|lang=/.test(html)?'ok':'missing'))\" # group:i18n check:47","humanCommand":"Verify locale alternates and translated routes for all supported locales; review the report-readiness evidence dimension for Internationalization Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-i18n-48","testId":"ni-i18n-48","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Internationalization Integrity: Operator Actionability","description":"Validates clear remediation, owner action, difficulty, and retest path for i18n readiness, locale routing, language metadata, and translation coverage. Evidence should include fix instructions and command evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Internationalization Integrity: Operator Actionability appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the operator actionability evidence for internationalization integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-i18n-48","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["i18n","localization","language","quality","operator-actionability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(/hreflang|lang=/.test(html)?'ok':'missing'))\" # group:i18n check:48","humanCommand":"Verify locale alternates and translated routes for all supported locales; review the operator-actionability evidence dimension for Internationalization Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-i18n-49","testId":"ni-i18n-49","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Internationalization Integrity: Degraded State","description":"Validates honest degraded, unavailable, skipped, and not-applicable states for i18n readiness, locale routing, language metadata, and translation coverage. Evidence should include status and storage evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Internationalization Integrity: Degraded State appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the degraded state evidence for internationalization integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-i18n-49","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["i18n","localization","language","quality","degraded-state","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(/hreflang|lang=/.test(html)?'ok':'missing'))\" # group:i18n check:49","humanCommand":"Verify locale alternates and translated routes for all supported locales; review the degraded-state evidence dimension for Internationalization Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-i18n-50","testId":"ni-i18n-50","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Internationalization Integrity: Reproducibility","description":"Validates stable CLI/API/human reproduction path and deterministic rerun instructions for i18n readiness, locale routing, language metadata, and translation coverage. Evidence should include commands and registry version evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Internationalization Integrity: Reproducibility appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the reproducibility evidence for internationalization integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-i18n-50","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["i18n","localization","language","quality","reproducibility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log(/hreflang|lang=/.test(html)?'ok':'missing'))\" # group:i18n check:50","humanCommand":"Verify locale alternates and translated routes for all supported locales; review the reproducibility evidence dimension for Internationalization Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-llms-txt-01","testId":"ni-llms-txt-01","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs.txt Quality: Availability","description":"Validates public route availability and successful bounded fetch behavior for llms.txt discoverability, structure, consistency, and machine readability. Evidence should include HTTP status, timeout, and redirect evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs.txt Quality: Availability appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the availability evidence for llms.txt quality, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-txt-01","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms.txt","llm","ai-readiness","discoverability","availability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:llms-txt check:1","humanCommand":"Review llms.txt sections and score instruction clarity and scope; review the availability evidence dimension for LLMs.txt Quality"}},{"id":"ni-llms-txt-02","testId":"ni-llms-txt-02","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs.txt Quality: Public Safety","description":"Validates public-safe access boundaries without exposing private or protected data for llms.txt discoverability, structure, consistency, and machine readability. Evidence should include route policy and response-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs.txt Quality: Public Safety appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the public safety evidence for llms.txt quality, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-txt-02","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms.txt","llm","ai-readiness","discoverability","public-safety","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:llms-txt check:2","humanCommand":"Review llms.txt sections and score instruction clarity and scope; review the public-safety evidence dimension for LLMs.txt Quality"}},{"id":"ni-llms-txt-03","testId":"ni-llms-txt-03","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs.txt Quality: Canonical Url","description":"Validates canonical URL stability and normalized route identity for llms.txt discoverability, structure, consistency, and machine readability. Evidence should include canonical tags, redirects, and normalized URL evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs.txt Quality: Canonical Url appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the canonical url evidence for llms.txt quality, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-txt-03","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms.txt","llm","ai-readiness","discoverability","canonical-url","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:llms-txt check:3","humanCommand":"Review llms.txt sections and score instruction clarity and scope; review the canonical-url evidence dimension for LLMs.txt Quality"}},{"id":"ni-llms-txt-04","testId":"ni-llms-txt-04","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs.txt Quality: Metadata Clarity","description":"Validates title, description, and page-specific metadata clarity for llms.txt discoverability, structure, consistency, and machine readability. Evidence should include HTML metadata and extracted text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs.txt Quality: Metadata Clarity appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the metadata clarity evidence for llms.txt quality, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-txt-04","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms.txt","llm","ai-readiness","discoverability","metadata-clarity","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:llms-txt check:4","humanCommand":"Review llms.txt sections and score instruction clarity and scope; review the metadata-clarity evidence dimension for LLMs.txt Quality"}},{"id":"ni-llms-txt-05","testId":"ni-llms-txt-05","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs.txt Quality: Semantic Structure","description":"Validates semantic HTML structure for humans, agents, and assistive technology for llms.txt discoverability, structure, consistency, and machine readability. Evidence should include heading, landmark, and element evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs.txt Quality: Semantic Structure appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the semantic structure evidence for llms.txt quality, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-txt-05","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms.txt","llm","ai-readiness","discoverability","semantic-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:llms-txt check:5","humanCommand":"Review llms.txt sections and score instruction clarity and scope; review the semantic-structure evidence dimension for LLMs.txt Quality"}},{"id":"ni-llms-txt-06","testId":"ni-llms-txt-06","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs.txt Quality: Machine Readability","description":"Validates machine-readable public content and predictable parsing surfaces for llms.txt discoverability, structure, consistency, and machine readability. Evidence should include structured tags, JSON-LD, and document-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs.txt Quality: Machine Readability appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the machine readability evidence for llms.txt quality, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-txt-06","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms.txt","llm","ai-readiness","discoverability","machine-readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:llms-txt check:6","humanCommand":"Review llms.txt sections and score instruction clarity and scope; review the machine-readability evidence dimension for LLMs.txt Quality"}},{"id":"ni-llms-txt-07","testId":"ni-llms-txt-07","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs.txt Quality: Agent Discovery","description":"Validates agent discovery hints and AI-readable policy/documentation signals for llms.txt discoverability, structure, consistency, and machine readability. Evidence should include llms, policy, MCP, OpenAPI, or schema evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs.txt Quality: Agent Discovery appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the agent discovery evidence for llms.txt quality, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-txt-07","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms.txt","llm","ai-readiness","discoverability","agent-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:llms-txt check:7","humanCommand":"Review llms.txt sections and score instruction clarity and scope; review the agent-discovery evidence dimension for LLMs.txt Quality"}},{"id":"ni-llms-txt-08","testId":"ni-llms-txt-08","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs.txt Quality: Crawler Discovery","description":"Validates crawler discovery paths through robots, sitemap, feeds, and canonical links for llms.txt discoverability, structure, consistency, and machine readability. Evidence should include discovery artifact and link evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs.txt Quality: Crawler Discovery appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the crawler discovery evidence for llms.txt quality, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-txt-08","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms.txt","llm","ai-readiness","discoverability","crawler-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:llms-txt check:8","humanCommand":"Review llms.txt sections and score instruction clarity and scope; review the crawler-discovery evidence dimension for LLMs.txt Quality"}},{"id":"ni-llms-txt-09","testId":"ni-llms-txt-09","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs.txt Quality: Answerability","description":"Validates direct answer extraction and quotable explanatory content for llms.txt discoverability, structure, consistency, and machine readability. Evidence should include question, summary, heading, and paragraph evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs.txt Quality: Answerability appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the answerability evidence for llms.txt quality, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-txt-09","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms.txt","llm","ai-readiness","discoverability","answerability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:llms-txt check:9","humanCommand":"Review llms.txt sections and score instruction clarity and scope; review the answerability evidence dimension for LLMs.txt Quality"}},{"id":"ni-llms-txt-10","testId":"ni-llms-txt-10","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs.txt Quality: Generative Context","description":"Validates GEO context quality for generative engines without inventing measured facts for llms.txt discoverability, structure, consistency, and machine readability. Evidence should include entity, source, and instruction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs.txt Quality: Generative Context appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the generative context evidence for llms.txt quality, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-txt-10","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms.txt","llm","ai-readiness","discoverability","generative-context","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:llms-txt check:10","humanCommand":"Review llms.txt sections and score instruction clarity and scope; review the generative-context evidence dimension for LLMs.txt Quality"}},{"id":"ni-llms-txt-11","testId":"ni-llms-txt-11","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs.txt Quality: Search Intent","description":"Validates search intent alignment and snippet-friendly content structure for llms.txt discoverability, structure, consistency, and machine readability. Evidence should include metadata, headings, and topical text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs.txt Quality: Search Intent appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the search intent evidence for llms.txt quality, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-txt-11","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms.txt","llm","ai-readiness","discoverability","search-intent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:llms-txt check:11","humanCommand":"Review llms.txt sections and score instruction clarity and scope; review the search-intent evidence dimension for LLMs.txt Quality"}},{"id":"ni-llms-txt-12","testId":"ni-llms-txt-12","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs.txt Quality: Accessibility Semantics","description":"Validates accessible names, relationships, landmarks, and keyboard-relevant structure for llms.txt discoverability, structure, consistency, and machine readability. Evidence should include ARIA, labels, landmarks, and control evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs.txt Quality: Accessibility Semantics appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the accessibility semantics evidence for llms.txt quality, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-txt-12","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms.txt","llm","ai-readiness","discoverability","accessibility-semantics","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:llms-txt check:12","humanCommand":"Review llms.txt sections and score instruction clarity and scope; review the accessibility-semantics evidence dimension for LLMs.txt Quality"}},{"id":"ni-llms-txt-13","testId":"ni-llms-txt-13","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs.txt Quality: Mobile Readiness","description":"Validates mobile viewport, responsive content, and touch-friendly layout signals for llms.txt discoverability, structure, consistency, and machine readability. Evidence should include viewport and responsive asset evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs.txt Quality: Mobile Readiness appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the mobile readiness evidence for llms.txt quality, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-txt-13","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms.txt","llm","ai-readiness","discoverability","mobile-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:llms-txt check:13","humanCommand":"Review llms.txt sections and score instruction clarity and scope; review the mobile-readiness evidence dimension for LLMs.txt Quality"}},{"id":"ni-llms-txt-14","testId":"ni-llms-txt-14","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs.txt Quality: Performance Budget","description":"Validates performance budget compliance using measured or bounded deterministic inputs for llms.txt discoverability, structure, consistency, and machine readability. Evidence should include timing, byte, and Lighthouse-derived evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs.txt Quality: Performance Budget appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the performance budget evidence for llms.txt quality, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-txt-14","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms.txt","llm","ai-readiness","discoverability","performance-budget","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:llms-txt check:14","humanCommand":"Review llms.txt sections and score instruction clarity and scope; review the performance-budget evidence dimension for LLMs.txt Quality"}},{"id":"ni-llms-txt-15","testId":"ni-llms-txt-15","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs.txt Quality: Resource Efficiency","description":"Validates resource size, script/style count, and optimization opportunity signals for llms.txt discoverability, structure, consistency, and machine readability. Evidence should include resource and markup evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs.txt Quality: Resource Efficiency appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the resource efficiency evidence for llms.txt quality, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-txt-15","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms.txt","llm","ai-readiness","discoverability","resource-efficiency","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:llms-txt check:15","humanCommand":"Review llms.txt sections and score instruction clarity and scope; review the resource-efficiency evidence dimension for LLMs.txt Quality"}},{"id":"ni-llms-txt-16","testId":"ni-llms-txt-16","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs.txt Quality: Cache Freshness","description":"Validates cache behavior, freshness hints, and stale-content risk for llms.txt discoverability, structure, consistency, and machine readability. Evidence should include HTTP cache and timestamp evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs.txt Quality: Cache Freshness appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the cache freshness evidence for llms.txt quality, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-txt-16","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms.txt","llm","ai-readiness","discoverability","cache-freshness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:llms-txt check:16","humanCommand":"Review llms.txt sections and score instruction clarity and scope; review the cache-freshness evidence dimension for LLMs.txt Quality"}},{"id":"ni-llms-txt-17","testId":"ni-llms-txt-17","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs.txt Quality: Route Reliability","description":"Validates route reliability, redirect safety, and dead-link risk for llms.txt discoverability, structure, consistency, and machine readability. Evidence should include status, redirect, and sitemap evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs.txt Quality: Route Reliability appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the route reliability evidence for llms.txt quality, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-txt-17","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms.txt","llm","ai-readiness","discoverability","route-reliability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:llms-txt check:17","humanCommand":"Review llms.txt sections and score instruction clarity and scope; review the route-reliability evidence dimension for LLMs.txt Quality"}},{"id":"ni-llms-txt-18","testId":"ni-llms-txt-18","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs.txt Quality: Feed Quality","description":"Validates RSS/Atom/feed usefulness, parseability, and freshness for llms.txt discoverability, structure, consistency, and machine readability. Evidence should include feed XML and item evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs.txt Quality: Feed Quality appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the feed quality evidence for llms.txt quality, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-txt-18","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms.txt","llm","ai-readiness","discoverability","feed-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:llms-txt check:18","humanCommand":"Review llms.txt sections and score instruction clarity and scope; review the feed-quality evidence dimension for LLMs.txt Quality"}},{"id":"ni-llms-txt-19","testId":"ni-llms-txt-19","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs.txt Quality: Sitemap Quality","description":"Validates sitemap validity, public-safe URL coverage, and no-dead-link policy for llms.txt discoverability, structure, consistency, and machine readability. Evidence should include sitemap XML and bounded link-check evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs.txt Quality: Sitemap Quality appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the sitemap quality evidence for llms.txt quality, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-txt-19","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms.txt","llm","ai-readiness","discoverability","sitemap-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:llms-txt check:19","humanCommand":"Review llms.txt sections and score instruction clarity and scope; review the sitemap-quality evidence dimension for LLMs.txt Quality"}},{"id":"ni-llms-txt-20","testId":"ni-llms-txt-20","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs.txt Quality: Robots Alignment","description":"Validates robots.txt alignment with public/protected policy and sitemap discovery for llms.txt discoverability, structure, consistency, and machine readability. Evidence should include robots directives and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs.txt Quality: Robots Alignment appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the robots alignment evidence for llms.txt quality, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-txt-20","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms.txt","llm","ai-readiness","discoverability","robots-alignment","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:llms-txt check:20","humanCommand":"Review llms.txt sections and score instruction clarity and scope; review the robots-alignment evidence dimension for LLMs.txt Quality"}},{"id":"ni-llms-txt-21","testId":"ni-llms-txt-21","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs.txt Quality: Llms Structure","description":"Validates llms.txt structure, readability, endpoint coverage, and agent usefulness for llms.txt discoverability, structure, consistency, and machine readability. Evidence should include plain-text section and line-length evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs.txt Quality: Llms Structure appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms structure evidence for llms.txt quality, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-txt-21","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms.txt","llm","ai-readiness","discoverability","llms-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:llms-txt check:21","humanCommand":"Review llms.txt sections and score instruction clarity and scope; review the llms-structure evidence dimension for LLMs.txt Quality"}},{"id":"ni-llms-txt-22","testId":"ni-llms-txt-22","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs.txt Quality: Llms Index Schema","description":"Validates llms-index JSON schema shape and count reconciliation for llms.txt discoverability, structure, consistency, and machine readability. Evidence should include JSON keys, counts, and endpoint evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs.txt Quality: Llms Index Schema appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms index schema evidence for llms.txt quality, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-txt-22","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms.txt","llm","ai-readiness","discoverability","llms-index-schema","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:llms-txt check:22","humanCommand":"Review llms.txt sections and score instruction clarity and scope; review the llms-index-schema evidence dimension for LLMs.txt Quality"}},{"id":"ni-llms-txt-23","testId":"ni-llms-txt-23","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs.txt Quality: Humans Attribution","description":"Validates humans.txt attribution, maintainer, technology, and governance transparency for llms.txt discoverability, structure, consistency, and machine readability. Evidence should include humans.txt section evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs.txt Quality: Humans Attribution appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the humans attribution evidence for llms.txt quality, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-txt-23","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms.txt","llm","ai-readiness","discoverability","humans-attribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:llms-txt check:23","humanCommand":"Review llms.txt sections and score instruction clarity and scope; review the humans-attribution evidence dimension for LLMs.txt Quality"}},{"id":"ni-llms-txt-24","testId":"ni-llms-txt-24","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs.txt Quality: Agent Policy","description":"Validates agent-policy JSON clarity for allowed, disallowed, and protected operations for llms.txt discoverability, structure, consistency, and machine readability. Evidence should include well-known policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs.txt Quality: Agent Policy appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the agent policy evidence for llms.txt quality, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-txt-24","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms.txt","llm","ai-readiness","discoverability","agent-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:llms-txt check:24","humanCommand":"Review llms.txt sections and score instruction clarity and scope; review the agent-policy evidence dimension for LLMs.txt Quality"}},{"id":"ni-llms-txt-25","testId":"ni-llms-txt-25","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs.txt Quality: Ai Policy","description":"Validates AI policy clarity for training, search, answer use, caching, and attribution for llms.txt discoverability, structure, consistency, and machine readability. Evidence should include well-known AI policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs.txt Quality: Ai Policy appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ai policy evidence for llms.txt quality, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-txt-25","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms.txt","llm","ai-readiness","discoverability","ai-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:llms-txt check:25","humanCommand":"Review llms.txt sections and score instruction clarity and scope; review the ai-policy evidence dimension for LLMs.txt Quality"}},{"id":"ni-llms-txt-26","testId":"ni-llms-txt-26","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs.txt Quality: Trust Policy","description":"Validates trust policy coverage for privacy, traceability, metadata, and protected actions for llms.txt discoverability, structure, consistency, and machine readability. Evidence should include trust.json evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs.txt Quality: Trust Policy appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the trust policy evidence for llms.txt quality, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-txt-26","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms.txt","llm","ai-readiness","discoverability","trust-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:llms-txt check:26","humanCommand":"Review llms.txt sections and score instruction clarity and scope; review the trust-policy evidence dimension for LLMs.txt Quality"}},{"id":"ni-llms-txt-27","testId":"ni-llms-txt-27","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs.txt Quality: Openapi Contract","description":"Validates OpenAPI availability, server URL accuracy, schemas, and auth policy for llms.txt discoverability, structure, consistency, and machine readability. Evidence should include OpenAPI text/JSON evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs.txt Quality: Openapi Contract appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the openapi contract evidence for llms.txt quality, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-txt-27","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms.txt","llm","ai-readiness","discoverability","openapi-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:llms-txt check:27","humanCommand":"Review llms.txt sections and score instruction clarity and scope; review the openapi-contract evidence dimension for LLMs.txt Quality"}},{"id":"ni-llms-txt-28","testId":"ni-llms-txt-28","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs.txt Quality: Mcp Contract","description":"Validates MCP JSON-RPC introspection, real tools, resources, and protected boundaries for llms.txt discoverability, structure, consistency, and machine readability. Evidence should include MCP manifest and initialize evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs.txt Quality: Mcp Contract appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the mcp contract evidence for llms.txt quality, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-txt-28","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms.txt","llm","ai-readiness","discoverability","mcp-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:llms-txt check:28","humanCommand":"Review llms.txt sections and score instruction clarity and scope; review the mcp-contract evidence dimension for LLMs.txt Quality"}},{"id":"ni-llms-txt-29","testId":"ni-llms-txt-29","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs.txt Quality: Api Error Shape","description":"Validates API success/error response shape consistency for llms.txt discoverability, structure, consistency, and machine readability. Evidence should include REST envelope evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs.txt Quality: Api Error Shape appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the api error shape evidence for llms.txt quality, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-txt-29","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms.txt","llm","ai-readiness","discoverability","api-error-shape","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:llms-txt check:29","humanCommand":"Review llms.txt sections and score instruction clarity and scope; review the api-error-shape evidence dimension for LLMs.txt Quality"}},{"id":"ni-llms-txt-30","testId":"ni-llms-txt-30","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs.txt Quality: Traceability","description":"Validates trace propagation, request IDs, and safe observability correlation for llms.txt discoverability, structure, consistency, and machine readability. Evidence should include trace header and metadata evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs.txt Quality: Traceability appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the traceability evidence for llms.txt quality, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-txt-30","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms.txt","llm","ai-readiness","discoverability","traceability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:llms-txt check:30","humanCommand":"Review llms.txt sections and score instruction clarity and scope; review the traceability evidence dimension for LLMs.txt Quality"}},{"id":"ni-llms-txt-31","testId":"ni-llms-txt-31","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs.txt Quality: Ja4 Redaction","description":"Validates fingerprint-adjacent metadata redaction and non-public raw JA4 handling for llms.txt discoverability, structure, consistency, and machine readability. Evidence should include metadata policy and redaction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs.txt Quality: Ja4 Redaction appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the ja4 redaction evidence for llms.txt quality, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-txt-31","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms.txt","llm","ai-readiness","discoverability","ja4-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:llms-txt check:31","humanCommand":"Review llms.txt sections and score instruction clarity and scope; review the ja4-redaction evidence dimension for LLMs.txt Quality"}},{"id":"ni-llms-txt-32","testId":"ni-llms-txt-32","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs.txt Quality: Secret Redaction","description":"Validates absence of secrets, generic key examples, cookies, and raw tokens in public outputs for llms.txt discoverability, structure, consistency, and machine readability. Evidence should include public artifact scan evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs.txt Quality: Secret Redaction appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the secret redaction evidence for llms.txt quality, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-txt-32","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms.txt","llm","ai-readiness","discoverability","secret-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:llms-txt check:32","humanCommand":"Review llms.txt sections and score instruction clarity and scope; review the secret-redaction evidence dimension for LLMs.txt Quality"}},{"id":"ni-llms-txt-33","testId":"ni-llms-txt-33","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs.txt Quality: Security Headers","description":"Validates security header coverage and hardened transport signals for llms.txt discoverability, structure, consistency, and machine readability. Evidence should include HTTP header evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs.txt Quality: Security Headers appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the security headers evidence for llms.txt quality, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-txt-33","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms.txt","llm","ai-readiness","discoverability","security-headers","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:llms-txt check:33","humanCommand":"Review llms.txt sections and score instruction clarity and scope; review the security-headers evidence dimension for LLMs.txt Quality"}},{"id":"ni-llms-txt-34","testId":"ni-llms-txt-34","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs.txt Quality: Privacy Consent","description":"Validates privacy policy, consent, attribution, and data-use disclosure quality for llms.txt discoverability, structure, consistency, and machine readability. Evidence should include public page and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs.txt Quality: Privacy Consent appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the privacy consent evidence for llms.txt quality, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-txt-34","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms.txt","llm","ai-readiness","discoverability","privacy-consent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:llms-txt check:34","humanCommand":"Review llms.txt sections and score instruction clarity and scope; review the privacy-consent evidence dimension for LLMs.txt Quality"}},{"id":"ni-llms-txt-35","testId":"ni-llms-txt-35","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs.txt Quality: Structured Data","description":"Validates JSON-LD and entity modeling for machine interpretation for llms.txt discoverability, structure, consistency, and machine readability. Evidence should include schema block and parse evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs.txt Quality: Structured Data appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the structured data evidence for llms.txt quality, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-txt-35","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms.txt","llm","ai-readiness","discoverability","structured-data","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:llms-txt check:35","humanCommand":"Review llms.txt sections and score instruction clarity and scope; review the structured-data evidence dimension for LLMs.txt Quality"}},{"id":"ni-llms-txt-36","testId":"ni-llms-txt-36","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs.txt Quality: Social Preview","description":"Validates Open Graph and Twitter/X card readiness for public sharing for llms.txt discoverability, structure, consistency, and machine readability. Evidence should include meta tag evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs.txt Quality: Social Preview appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the social preview evidence for llms.txt quality, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-txt-36","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms.txt","llm","ai-readiness","discoverability","social-preview","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:llms-txt check:36","humanCommand":"Review llms.txt sections and score instruction clarity and scope; review the social-preview evidence dimension for LLMs.txt Quality"}},{"id":"ni-llms-txt-37","testId":"ni-llms-txt-37","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs.txt Quality: I18n Routing","description":"Validates locale route, hreflang, language declaration, and translation readiness for llms.txt discoverability, structure, consistency, and machine readability. Evidence should include lang/hreflang and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs.txt Quality: I18n Routing appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the i18n routing evidence for llms.txt quality, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-txt-37","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms.txt","llm","ai-readiness","discoverability","i18n-routing","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:llms-txt check:37","humanCommand":"Review llms.txt sections and score instruction clarity and scope; review the i18n-routing evidence dimension for LLMs.txt Quality"}},{"id":"ni-llms-txt-38","testId":"ni-llms-txt-38","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs.txt Quality: Readability","description":"Validates human readability, sectioning, sentence complexity, and comprehension support for llms.txt discoverability, structure, consistency, and machine readability. Evidence should include extracted content evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs.txt Quality: Readability appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the readability evidence for llms.txt quality, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-txt-38","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms.txt","llm","ai-readiness","discoverability","readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:llms-txt check:38","humanCommand":"Review llms.txt sections and score instruction clarity and scope; review the readability evidence dimension for LLMs.txt Quality"}},{"id":"ni-llms-txt-39","testId":"ni-llms-txt-39","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs.txt Quality: Content Utility","description":"Validates non-placeholder content usefulness and domain-specific public value for llms.txt discoverability, structure, consistency, and machine readability. Evidence should include content extraction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs.txt Quality: Content Utility appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the content utility evidence for llms.txt quality, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-txt-39","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms.txt","llm","ai-readiness","discoverability","content-utility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:llms-txt check:39","humanCommand":"Review llms.txt sections and score instruction clarity and scope; review the content-utility evidence dimension for LLMs.txt Quality"}},{"id":"ni-llms-txt-40","testId":"ni-llms-txt-40","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs.txt Quality: Recommendation Grounding","description":"Validates recommendation grounding in deterministic evidence instead of fabricated model output for llms.txt discoverability, structure, consistency, and machine readability. Evidence should include issue and remediation evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs.txt Quality: Recommendation Grounding appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the recommendation grounding evidence for llms.txt quality, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-txt-40","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms.txt","llm","ai-readiness","discoverability","recommendation-grounding","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:llms-txt check:40","humanCommand":"Review llms.txt sections and score instruction clarity and scope; review the recommendation-grounding evidence dimension for LLMs.txt Quality"}},{"id":"ni-llms-txt-41","testId":"ni-llms-txt-41","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs.txt Quality: Evidence Quality","description":"Validates evidence completeness, public safety, and reproducibility for llms.txt discoverability, structure, consistency, and machine readability. Evidence should include test output and artifact evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs.txt Quality: Evidence Quality appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the evidence quality evidence for llms.txt quality, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-txt-41","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms.txt","llm","ai-readiness","discoverability","evidence-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:llms-txt check:41","humanCommand":"Review llms.txt sections and score instruction clarity and scope; review the evidence-quality evidence dimension for LLMs.txt Quality"}},{"id":"ni-llms-txt-42","testId":"ni-llms-txt-42","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs.txt Quality: Threshold Policy","description":"Validates threshold clarity, pass/warn/fail semantics, and scoring transparency for llms.txt discoverability, structure, consistency, and machine readability. Evidence should include threshold and result status evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs.txt Quality: Threshold Policy appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the threshold policy evidence for llms.txt quality, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-txt-42","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms.txt","llm","ai-readiness","discoverability","threshold-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:llms-txt check:42","humanCommand":"Review llms.txt sections and score instruction clarity and scope; review the threshold-policy evidence dimension for LLMs.txt Quality"}},{"id":"ni-llms-txt-43","testId":"ni-llms-txt-43","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs.txt Quality: Confidence","description":"Validates confidence scoring and degraded-input disclosure for llms.txt discoverability, structure, consistency, and machine readability. Evidence should include source freshness and input availability evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs.txt Quality: Confidence appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the confidence evidence for llms.txt quality, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-txt-43","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms.txt","llm","ai-readiness","discoverability","confidence","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:llms-txt check:43","humanCommand":"Review llms.txt sections and score instruction clarity and scope; review the confidence evidence dimension for LLMs.txt Quality"}},{"id":"ni-llms-txt-44","testId":"ni-llms-txt-44","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs.txt Quality: Trend Readiness","description":"Validates historical comparability and timeline readiness for future reruns for llms.txt discoverability, structure, consistency, and machine readability. Evidence should include analysis ID, timestamp, and persistence evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs.txt Quality: Trend Readiness appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the trend readiness evidence for llms.txt quality, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-txt-44","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms.txt","llm","ai-readiness","discoverability","trend-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:llms-txt check:44","humanCommand":"Review llms.txt sections and score instruction clarity and scope; review the trend-readiness evidence dimension for LLMs.txt Quality"}},{"id":"ni-llms-txt-45","testId":"ni-llms-txt-45","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs.txt Quality: Ranking Readiness","description":"Validates ranking input completeness and profile compatibility for llms.txt discoverability, structure, consistency, and machine readability. Evidence should include score and profile evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs.txt Quality: Ranking Readiness appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ranking readiness evidence for llms.txt quality, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-txt-45","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms.txt","llm","ai-readiness","discoverability","ranking-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:llms-txt check:45","humanCommand":"Review llms.txt sections and score instruction clarity and scope; review the ranking-readiness evidence dimension for LLMs.txt Quality"}},{"id":"ni-llms-txt-46","testId":"ni-llms-txt-46","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs.txt Quality: Network Contribution","description":"Validates PlatPhorm network contribution through discovery, integrations, and standards compliance for llms.txt discoverability, structure, consistency, and machine readability. Evidence should include network graph and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs.txt Quality: Network Contribution appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the network contribution evidence for llms.txt quality, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-txt-46","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms.txt","llm","ai-readiness","discoverability","network-contribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:llms-txt check:46","humanCommand":"Review llms.txt sections and score instruction clarity and scope; review the network-contribution evidence dimension for LLMs.txt Quality"}},{"id":"ni-llms-txt-47","testId":"ni-llms-txt-47","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs.txt Quality: Report Readiness","description":"Validates report/export categorization with public-safe evidence and protected boundaries for llms.txt discoverability, structure, consistency, and machine readability. Evidence should include report section mapping evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs.txt Quality: Report Readiness appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the report readiness evidence for llms.txt quality, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-txt-47","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms.txt","llm","ai-readiness","discoverability","report-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:llms-txt check:47","humanCommand":"Review llms.txt sections and score instruction clarity and scope; review the report-readiness evidence dimension for LLMs.txt Quality"}},{"id":"ni-llms-txt-48","testId":"ni-llms-txt-48","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs.txt Quality: Operator Actionability","description":"Validates clear remediation, owner action, difficulty, and retest path for llms.txt discoverability, structure, consistency, and machine readability. Evidence should include fix instructions and command evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs.txt Quality: Operator Actionability appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the operator actionability evidence for llms.txt quality, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-txt-48","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms.txt","llm","ai-readiness","discoverability","operator-actionability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:llms-txt check:48","humanCommand":"Review llms.txt sections and score instruction clarity and scope; review the operator-actionability evidence dimension for LLMs.txt Quality"}},{"id":"ni-llms-txt-49","testId":"ni-llms-txt-49","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs.txt Quality: Degraded State","description":"Validates honest degraded, unavailable, skipped, and not-applicable states for llms.txt discoverability, structure, consistency, and machine readability. Evidence should include status and storage evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs.txt Quality: Degraded State appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the degraded state evidence for llms.txt quality, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-txt-49","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms.txt","llm","ai-readiness","discoverability","degraded-state","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:llms-txt check:49","humanCommand":"Review llms.txt sections and score instruction clarity and scope; review the degraded-state evidence dimension for LLMs.txt Quality"}},{"id":"ni-llms-txt-50","testId":"ni-llms-txt-50","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs.txt Quality: Reproducibility","description":"Validates stable CLI/API/human reproduction path and deterministic rerun instructions for llms.txt discoverability, structure, consistency, and machine readability. Evidence should include commands and registry version evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs.txt Quality: Reproducibility appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the reproducibility evidence for llms.txt quality, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-txt-50","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms.txt","llm","ai-readiness","discoverability","reproducibility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:llms-txt check:50","humanCommand":"Review llms.txt sections and score instruction clarity and scope; review the reproducibility evidence dimension for LLMs.txt Quality"}},{"id":"ni-llms-index-01","testId":"ni-llms-index-01","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs Index Contract: Availability","description":"Validates public route availability and successful bounded fetch behavior for llms-index.json presence, schema integrity, and scoring evidence. Evidence should include HTTP status, timeout, and redirect evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs Index Contract: Availability appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the availability evidence for llms index contract, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-index-01","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms-index.json","llm","json","ai-readiness","availability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms-index.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:llms-index check:1","humanCommand":"Validate llms-index.json fields against documented contract; review the availability evidence dimension for LLMs Index Contract"}},{"id":"ni-llms-index-02","testId":"ni-llms-index-02","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs Index Contract: Public Safety","description":"Validates public-safe access boundaries without exposing private or protected data for llms-index.json presence, schema integrity, and scoring evidence. Evidence should include route policy and response-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs Index Contract: Public Safety appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the public safety evidence for llms index contract, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-index-02","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms-index.json","llm","json","ai-readiness","public-safety","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms-index.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:llms-index check:2","humanCommand":"Validate llms-index.json fields against documented contract; review the public-safety evidence dimension for LLMs Index Contract"}},{"id":"ni-llms-index-03","testId":"ni-llms-index-03","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs Index Contract: Canonical Url","description":"Validates canonical URL stability and normalized route identity for llms-index.json presence, schema integrity, and scoring evidence. Evidence should include canonical tags, redirects, and normalized URL evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs Index Contract: Canonical Url appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the canonical url evidence for llms index contract, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-index-03","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms-index.json","llm","json","ai-readiness","canonical-url","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms-index.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:llms-index check:3","humanCommand":"Validate llms-index.json fields against documented contract; review the canonical-url evidence dimension for LLMs Index Contract"}},{"id":"ni-llms-index-04","testId":"ni-llms-index-04","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs Index Contract: Metadata Clarity","description":"Validates title, description, and page-specific metadata clarity for llms-index.json presence, schema integrity, and scoring evidence. Evidence should include HTML metadata and extracted text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs Index Contract: Metadata Clarity appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the metadata clarity evidence for llms index contract, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-index-04","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms-index.json","llm","json","ai-readiness","metadata-clarity","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms-index.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:llms-index check:4","humanCommand":"Validate llms-index.json fields against documented contract; review the metadata-clarity evidence dimension for LLMs Index Contract"}},{"id":"ni-llms-index-05","testId":"ni-llms-index-05","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs Index Contract: Semantic Structure","description":"Validates semantic HTML structure for humans, agents, and assistive technology for llms-index.json presence, schema integrity, and scoring evidence. Evidence should include heading, landmark, and element evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs Index Contract: Semantic Structure appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the semantic structure evidence for llms index contract, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-index-05","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms-index.json","llm","json","ai-readiness","semantic-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms-index.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:llms-index check:5","humanCommand":"Validate llms-index.json fields against documented contract; review the semantic-structure evidence dimension for LLMs Index Contract"}},{"id":"ni-llms-index-06","testId":"ni-llms-index-06","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs Index Contract: Machine Readability","description":"Validates machine-readable public content and predictable parsing surfaces for llms-index.json presence, schema integrity, and scoring evidence. Evidence should include structured tags, JSON-LD, and document-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs Index Contract: Machine Readability appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the machine readability evidence for llms index contract, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-index-06","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms-index.json","llm","json","ai-readiness","machine-readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms-index.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:llms-index check:6","humanCommand":"Validate llms-index.json fields against documented contract; review the machine-readability evidence dimension for LLMs Index Contract"}},{"id":"ni-llms-index-07","testId":"ni-llms-index-07","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs Index Contract: Agent Discovery","description":"Validates agent discovery hints and AI-readable policy/documentation signals for llms-index.json presence, schema integrity, and scoring evidence. Evidence should include llms, policy, MCP, OpenAPI, or schema evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs Index Contract: Agent Discovery appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the agent discovery evidence for llms index contract, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-index-07","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms-index.json","llm","json","ai-readiness","agent-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms-index.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:llms-index check:7","humanCommand":"Validate llms-index.json fields against documented contract; review the agent-discovery evidence dimension for LLMs Index Contract"}},{"id":"ni-llms-index-08","testId":"ni-llms-index-08","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs Index Contract: Crawler Discovery","description":"Validates crawler discovery paths through robots, sitemap, feeds, and canonical links for llms-index.json presence, schema integrity, and scoring evidence. Evidence should include discovery artifact and link evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs Index Contract: Crawler Discovery appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the crawler discovery evidence for llms index contract, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-index-08","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms-index.json","llm","json","ai-readiness","crawler-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms-index.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:llms-index check:8","humanCommand":"Validate llms-index.json fields against documented contract; review the crawler-discovery evidence dimension for LLMs Index Contract"}},{"id":"ni-llms-index-09","testId":"ni-llms-index-09","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs Index Contract: Answerability","description":"Validates direct answer extraction and quotable explanatory content for llms-index.json presence, schema integrity, and scoring evidence. Evidence should include question, summary, heading, and paragraph evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs Index Contract: Answerability appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the answerability evidence for llms index contract, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-index-09","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms-index.json","llm","json","ai-readiness","answerability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms-index.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:llms-index check:9","humanCommand":"Validate llms-index.json fields against documented contract; review the answerability evidence dimension for LLMs Index Contract"}},{"id":"ni-llms-index-10","testId":"ni-llms-index-10","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs Index Contract: Generative Context","description":"Validates GEO context quality for generative engines without inventing measured facts for llms-index.json presence, schema integrity, and scoring evidence. Evidence should include entity, source, and instruction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs Index Contract: Generative Context appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the generative context evidence for llms index contract, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-index-10","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms-index.json","llm","json","ai-readiness","generative-context","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms-index.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:llms-index check:10","humanCommand":"Validate llms-index.json fields against documented contract; review the generative-context evidence dimension for LLMs Index Contract"}},{"id":"ni-llms-index-11","testId":"ni-llms-index-11","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs Index Contract: Search Intent","description":"Validates search intent alignment and snippet-friendly content structure for llms-index.json presence, schema integrity, and scoring evidence. Evidence should include metadata, headings, and topical text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs Index Contract: Search Intent appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the search intent evidence for llms index contract, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-index-11","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms-index.json","llm","json","ai-readiness","search-intent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms-index.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:llms-index check:11","humanCommand":"Validate llms-index.json fields against documented contract; review the search-intent evidence dimension for LLMs Index Contract"}},{"id":"ni-llms-index-12","testId":"ni-llms-index-12","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs Index Contract: Accessibility Semantics","description":"Validates accessible names, relationships, landmarks, and keyboard-relevant structure for llms-index.json presence, schema integrity, and scoring evidence. Evidence should include ARIA, labels, landmarks, and control evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs Index Contract: Accessibility Semantics appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the accessibility semantics evidence for llms index contract, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-index-12","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms-index.json","llm","json","ai-readiness","accessibility-semantics","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms-index.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:llms-index check:12","humanCommand":"Validate llms-index.json fields against documented contract; review the accessibility-semantics evidence dimension for LLMs Index Contract"}},{"id":"ni-llms-index-13","testId":"ni-llms-index-13","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs Index Contract: Mobile Readiness","description":"Validates mobile viewport, responsive content, and touch-friendly layout signals for llms-index.json presence, schema integrity, and scoring evidence. Evidence should include viewport and responsive asset evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs Index Contract: Mobile Readiness appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the mobile readiness evidence for llms index contract, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-index-13","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms-index.json","llm","json","ai-readiness","mobile-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms-index.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:llms-index check:13","humanCommand":"Validate llms-index.json fields against documented contract; review the mobile-readiness evidence dimension for LLMs Index Contract"}},{"id":"ni-llms-index-14","testId":"ni-llms-index-14","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs Index Contract: Performance Budget","description":"Validates performance budget compliance using measured or bounded deterministic inputs for llms-index.json presence, schema integrity, and scoring evidence. Evidence should include timing, byte, and Lighthouse-derived evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs Index Contract: Performance Budget appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the performance budget evidence for llms index contract, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-index-14","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms-index.json","llm","json","ai-readiness","performance-budget","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms-index.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:llms-index check:14","humanCommand":"Validate llms-index.json fields against documented contract; review the performance-budget evidence dimension for LLMs Index Contract"}},{"id":"ni-llms-index-15","testId":"ni-llms-index-15","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs Index Contract: Resource Efficiency","description":"Validates resource size, script/style count, and optimization opportunity signals for llms-index.json presence, schema integrity, and scoring evidence. Evidence should include resource and markup evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs Index Contract: Resource Efficiency appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the resource efficiency evidence for llms index contract, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-index-15","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms-index.json","llm","json","ai-readiness","resource-efficiency","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms-index.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:llms-index check:15","humanCommand":"Validate llms-index.json fields against documented contract; review the resource-efficiency evidence dimension for LLMs Index Contract"}},{"id":"ni-llms-index-16","testId":"ni-llms-index-16","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs Index Contract: Cache Freshness","description":"Validates cache behavior, freshness hints, and stale-content risk for llms-index.json presence, schema integrity, and scoring evidence. Evidence should include HTTP cache and timestamp evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs Index Contract: Cache Freshness appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the cache freshness evidence for llms index contract, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-index-16","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms-index.json","llm","json","ai-readiness","cache-freshness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms-index.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:llms-index check:16","humanCommand":"Validate llms-index.json fields against documented contract; review the cache-freshness evidence dimension for LLMs Index Contract"}},{"id":"ni-llms-index-17","testId":"ni-llms-index-17","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs Index Contract: Route Reliability","description":"Validates route reliability, redirect safety, and dead-link risk for llms-index.json presence, schema integrity, and scoring evidence. Evidence should include status, redirect, and sitemap evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs Index Contract: Route Reliability appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the route reliability evidence for llms index contract, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-index-17","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms-index.json","llm","json","ai-readiness","route-reliability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms-index.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:llms-index check:17","humanCommand":"Validate llms-index.json fields against documented contract; review the route-reliability evidence dimension for LLMs Index Contract"}},{"id":"ni-llms-index-18","testId":"ni-llms-index-18","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs Index Contract: Feed Quality","description":"Validates RSS/Atom/feed usefulness, parseability, and freshness for llms-index.json presence, schema integrity, and scoring evidence. Evidence should include feed XML and item evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs Index Contract: Feed Quality appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the feed quality evidence for llms index contract, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-index-18","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms-index.json","llm","json","ai-readiness","feed-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms-index.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:llms-index check:18","humanCommand":"Validate llms-index.json fields against documented contract; review the feed-quality evidence dimension for LLMs Index Contract"}},{"id":"ni-llms-index-19","testId":"ni-llms-index-19","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs Index Contract: Sitemap Quality","description":"Validates sitemap validity, public-safe URL coverage, and no-dead-link policy for llms-index.json presence, schema integrity, and scoring evidence. Evidence should include sitemap XML and bounded link-check evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs Index Contract: Sitemap Quality appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the sitemap quality evidence for llms index contract, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-index-19","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms-index.json","llm","json","ai-readiness","sitemap-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms-index.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:llms-index check:19","humanCommand":"Validate llms-index.json fields against documented contract; review the sitemap-quality evidence dimension for LLMs Index Contract"}},{"id":"ni-llms-index-20","testId":"ni-llms-index-20","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs Index Contract: Robots Alignment","description":"Validates robots.txt alignment with public/protected policy and sitemap discovery for llms-index.json presence, schema integrity, and scoring evidence. Evidence should include robots directives and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs Index Contract: Robots Alignment appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the robots alignment evidence for llms index contract, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-index-20","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms-index.json","llm","json","ai-readiness","robots-alignment","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms-index.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:llms-index check:20","humanCommand":"Validate llms-index.json fields against documented contract; review the robots-alignment evidence dimension for LLMs Index Contract"}},{"id":"ni-llms-index-21","testId":"ni-llms-index-21","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs Index Contract: Llms Structure","description":"Validates llms.txt structure, readability, endpoint coverage, and agent usefulness for llms-index.json presence, schema integrity, and scoring evidence. Evidence should include plain-text section and line-length evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs Index Contract: Llms Structure appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms structure evidence for llms index contract, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-index-21","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms-index.json","llm","json","ai-readiness","llms-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms-index.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:llms-index check:21","humanCommand":"Validate llms-index.json fields against documented contract; review the llms-structure evidence dimension for LLMs Index Contract"}},{"id":"ni-llms-index-22","testId":"ni-llms-index-22","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs Index Contract: Llms Index Schema","description":"Validates llms-index JSON schema shape and count reconciliation for llms-index.json presence, schema integrity, and scoring evidence. Evidence should include JSON keys, counts, and endpoint evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs Index Contract: Llms Index Schema appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms index schema evidence for llms index contract, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-index-22","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms-index.json","llm","json","ai-readiness","llms-index-schema","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms-index.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:llms-index check:22","humanCommand":"Validate llms-index.json fields against documented contract; review the llms-index-schema evidence dimension for LLMs Index Contract"}},{"id":"ni-llms-index-23","testId":"ni-llms-index-23","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs Index Contract: Humans Attribution","description":"Validates humans.txt attribution, maintainer, technology, and governance transparency for llms-index.json presence, schema integrity, and scoring evidence. Evidence should include humans.txt section evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs Index Contract: Humans Attribution appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the humans attribution evidence for llms index contract, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-index-23","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms-index.json","llm","json","ai-readiness","humans-attribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms-index.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:llms-index check:23","humanCommand":"Validate llms-index.json fields against documented contract; review the humans-attribution evidence dimension for LLMs Index Contract"}},{"id":"ni-llms-index-24","testId":"ni-llms-index-24","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs Index Contract: Agent Policy","description":"Validates agent-policy JSON clarity for allowed, disallowed, and protected operations for llms-index.json presence, schema integrity, and scoring evidence. Evidence should include well-known policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs Index Contract: Agent Policy appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the agent policy evidence for llms index contract, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-index-24","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms-index.json","llm","json","ai-readiness","agent-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms-index.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:llms-index check:24","humanCommand":"Validate llms-index.json fields against documented contract; review the agent-policy evidence dimension for LLMs Index Contract"}},{"id":"ni-llms-index-25","testId":"ni-llms-index-25","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs Index Contract: Ai Policy","description":"Validates AI policy clarity for training, search, answer use, caching, and attribution for llms-index.json presence, schema integrity, and scoring evidence. Evidence should include well-known AI policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs Index Contract: Ai Policy appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ai policy evidence for llms index contract, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-index-25","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms-index.json","llm","json","ai-readiness","ai-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms-index.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:llms-index check:25","humanCommand":"Validate llms-index.json fields against documented contract; review the ai-policy evidence dimension for LLMs Index Contract"}},{"id":"ni-llms-index-26","testId":"ni-llms-index-26","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs Index Contract: Trust Policy","description":"Validates trust policy coverage for privacy, traceability, metadata, and protected actions for llms-index.json presence, schema integrity, and scoring evidence. Evidence should include trust.json evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs Index Contract: Trust Policy appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the trust policy evidence for llms index contract, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-index-26","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms-index.json","llm","json","ai-readiness","trust-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms-index.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:llms-index check:26","humanCommand":"Validate llms-index.json fields against documented contract; review the trust-policy evidence dimension for LLMs Index Contract"}},{"id":"ni-llms-index-27","testId":"ni-llms-index-27","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs Index Contract: Openapi Contract","description":"Validates OpenAPI availability, server URL accuracy, schemas, and auth policy for llms-index.json presence, schema integrity, and scoring evidence. Evidence should include OpenAPI text/JSON evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs Index Contract: Openapi Contract appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the openapi contract evidence for llms index contract, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-index-27","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms-index.json","llm","json","ai-readiness","openapi-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms-index.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:llms-index check:27","humanCommand":"Validate llms-index.json fields against documented contract; review the openapi-contract evidence dimension for LLMs Index Contract"}},{"id":"ni-llms-index-28","testId":"ni-llms-index-28","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs Index Contract: Mcp Contract","description":"Validates MCP JSON-RPC introspection, real tools, resources, and protected boundaries for llms-index.json presence, schema integrity, and scoring evidence. Evidence should include MCP manifest and initialize evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs Index Contract: Mcp Contract appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the mcp contract evidence for llms index contract, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-index-28","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms-index.json","llm","json","ai-readiness","mcp-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms-index.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:llms-index check:28","humanCommand":"Validate llms-index.json fields against documented contract; review the mcp-contract evidence dimension for LLMs Index Contract"}},{"id":"ni-llms-index-29","testId":"ni-llms-index-29","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs Index Contract: Api Error Shape","description":"Validates API success/error response shape consistency for llms-index.json presence, schema integrity, and scoring evidence. Evidence should include REST envelope evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs Index Contract: Api Error Shape appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the api error shape evidence for llms index contract, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-index-29","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms-index.json","llm","json","ai-readiness","api-error-shape","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms-index.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:llms-index check:29","humanCommand":"Validate llms-index.json fields against documented contract; review the api-error-shape evidence dimension for LLMs Index Contract"}},{"id":"ni-llms-index-30","testId":"ni-llms-index-30","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs Index Contract: Traceability","description":"Validates trace propagation, request IDs, and safe observability correlation for llms-index.json presence, schema integrity, and scoring evidence. Evidence should include trace header and metadata evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs Index Contract: Traceability appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the traceability evidence for llms index contract, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-index-30","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms-index.json","llm","json","ai-readiness","traceability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms-index.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:llms-index check:30","humanCommand":"Validate llms-index.json fields against documented contract; review the traceability evidence dimension for LLMs Index Contract"}},{"id":"ni-llms-index-31","testId":"ni-llms-index-31","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs Index Contract: Ja4 Redaction","description":"Validates fingerprint-adjacent metadata redaction and non-public raw JA4 handling for llms-index.json presence, schema integrity, and scoring evidence. Evidence should include metadata policy and redaction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs Index Contract: Ja4 Redaction appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the ja4 redaction evidence for llms index contract, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-index-31","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms-index.json","llm","json","ai-readiness","ja4-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms-index.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:llms-index check:31","humanCommand":"Validate llms-index.json fields against documented contract; review the ja4-redaction evidence dimension for LLMs Index Contract"}},{"id":"ni-llms-index-32","testId":"ni-llms-index-32","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs Index Contract: Secret Redaction","description":"Validates absence of secrets, generic key examples, cookies, and raw tokens in public outputs for llms-index.json presence, schema integrity, and scoring evidence. Evidence should include public artifact scan evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs Index Contract: Secret Redaction appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the secret redaction evidence for llms index contract, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-index-32","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms-index.json","llm","json","ai-readiness","secret-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms-index.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:llms-index check:32","humanCommand":"Validate llms-index.json fields against documented contract; review the secret-redaction evidence dimension for LLMs Index Contract"}},{"id":"ni-llms-index-33","testId":"ni-llms-index-33","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs Index Contract: Security Headers","description":"Validates security header coverage and hardened transport signals for llms-index.json presence, schema integrity, and scoring evidence. Evidence should include HTTP header evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs Index Contract: Security Headers appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the security headers evidence for llms index contract, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-index-33","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms-index.json","llm","json","ai-readiness","security-headers","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms-index.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:llms-index check:33","humanCommand":"Validate llms-index.json fields against documented contract; review the security-headers evidence dimension for LLMs Index Contract"}},{"id":"ni-llms-index-34","testId":"ni-llms-index-34","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs Index Contract: Privacy Consent","description":"Validates privacy policy, consent, attribution, and data-use disclosure quality for llms-index.json presence, schema integrity, and scoring evidence. Evidence should include public page and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs Index Contract: Privacy Consent appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the privacy consent evidence for llms index contract, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-index-34","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms-index.json","llm","json","ai-readiness","privacy-consent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms-index.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:llms-index check:34","humanCommand":"Validate llms-index.json fields against documented contract; review the privacy-consent evidence dimension for LLMs Index Contract"}},{"id":"ni-llms-index-35","testId":"ni-llms-index-35","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs Index Contract: Structured Data","description":"Validates JSON-LD and entity modeling for machine interpretation for llms-index.json presence, schema integrity, and scoring evidence. Evidence should include schema block and parse evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs Index Contract: Structured Data appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the structured data evidence for llms index contract, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-index-35","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms-index.json","llm","json","ai-readiness","structured-data","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms-index.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:llms-index check:35","humanCommand":"Validate llms-index.json fields against documented contract; review the structured-data evidence dimension for LLMs Index Contract"}},{"id":"ni-llms-index-36","testId":"ni-llms-index-36","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs Index Contract: Social Preview","description":"Validates Open Graph and Twitter/X card readiness for public sharing for llms-index.json presence, schema integrity, and scoring evidence. Evidence should include meta tag evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs Index Contract: Social Preview appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the social preview evidence for llms index contract, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-index-36","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms-index.json","llm","json","ai-readiness","social-preview","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms-index.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:llms-index check:36","humanCommand":"Validate llms-index.json fields against documented contract; review the social-preview evidence dimension for LLMs Index Contract"}},{"id":"ni-llms-index-37","testId":"ni-llms-index-37","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs Index Contract: I18n Routing","description":"Validates locale route, hreflang, language declaration, and translation readiness for llms-index.json presence, schema integrity, and scoring evidence. Evidence should include lang/hreflang and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs Index Contract: I18n Routing appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the i18n routing evidence for llms index contract, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-index-37","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms-index.json","llm","json","ai-readiness","i18n-routing","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms-index.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:llms-index check:37","humanCommand":"Validate llms-index.json fields against documented contract; review the i18n-routing evidence dimension for LLMs Index Contract"}},{"id":"ni-llms-index-38","testId":"ni-llms-index-38","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs Index Contract: Readability","description":"Validates human readability, sectioning, sentence complexity, and comprehension support for llms-index.json presence, schema integrity, and scoring evidence. Evidence should include extracted content evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs Index Contract: Readability appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the readability evidence for llms index contract, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-index-38","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms-index.json","llm","json","ai-readiness","readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms-index.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:llms-index check:38","humanCommand":"Validate llms-index.json fields against documented contract; review the readability evidence dimension for LLMs Index Contract"}},{"id":"ni-llms-index-39","testId":"ni-llms-index-39","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs Index Contract: Content Utility","description":"Validates non-placeholder content usefulness and domain-specific public value for llms-index.json presence, schema integrity, and scoring evidence. Evidence should include content extraction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs Index Contract: Content Utility appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the content utility evidence for llms index contract, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-index-39","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms-index.json","llm","json","ai-readiness","content-utility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms-index.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:llms-index check:39","humanCommand":"Validate llms-index.json fields against documented contract; review the content-utility evidence dimension for LLMs Index Contract"}},{"id":"ni-llms-index-40","testId":"ni-llms-index-40","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs Index Contract: Recommendation Grounding","description":"Validates recommendation grounding in deterministic evidence instead of fabricated model output for llms-index.json presence, schema integrity, and scoring evidence. Evidence should include issue and remediation evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs Index Contract: Recommendation Grounding appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the recommendation grounding evidence for llms index contract, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-index-40","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms-index.json","llm","json","ai-readiness","recommendation-grounding","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms-index.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:llms-index check:40","humanCommand":"Validate llms-index.json fields against documented contract; review the recommendation-grounding evidence dimension for LLMs Index Contract"}},{"id":"ni-llms-index-41","testId":"ni-llms-index-41","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs Index Contract: Evidence Quality","description":"Validates evidence completeness, public safety, and reproducibility for llms-index.json presence, schema integrity, and scoring evidence. Evidence should include test output and artifact evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs Index Contract: Evidence Quality appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the evidence quality evidence for llms index contract, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-index-41","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms-index.json","llm","json","ai-readiness","evidence-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms-index.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:llms-index check:41","humanCommand":"Validate llms-index.json fields against documented contract; review the evidence-quality evidence dimension for LLMs Index Contract"}},{"id":"ni-llms-index-42","testId":"ni-llms-index-42","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs Index Contract: Threshold Policy","description":"Validates threshold clarity, pass/warn/fail semantics, and scoring transparency for llms-index.json presence, schema integrity, and scoring evidence. Evidence should include threshold and result status evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs Index Contract: Threshold Policy appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the threshold policy evidence for llms index contract, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-index-42","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms-index.json","llm","json","ai-readiness","threshold-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms-index.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:llms-index check:42","humanCommand":"Validate llms-index.json fields against documented contract; review the threshold-policy evidence dimension for LLMs Index Contract"}},{"id":"ni-llms-index-43","testId":"ni-llms-index-43","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs Index Contract: Confidence","description":"Validates confidence scoring and degraded-input disclosure for llms-index.json presence, schema integrity, and scoring evidence. Evidence should include source freshness and input availability evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs Index Contract: Confidence appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the confidence evidence for llms index contract, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-index-43","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms-index.json","llm","json","ai-readiness","confidence","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms-index.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:llms-index check:43","humanCommand":"Validate llms-index.json fields against documented contract; review the confidence evidence dimension for LLMs Index Contract"}},{"id":"ni-llms-index-44","testId":"ni-llms-index-44","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs Index Contract: Trend Readiness","description":"Validates historical comparability and timeline readiness for future reruns for llms-index.json presence, schema integrity, and scoring evidence. Evidence should include analysis ID, timestamp, and persistence evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs Index Contract: Trend Readiness appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the trend readiness evidence for llms index contract, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-index-44","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms-index.json","llm","json","ai-readiness","trend-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms-index.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:llms-index check:44","humanCommand":"Validate llms-index.json fields against documented contract; review the trend-readiness evidence dimension for LLMs Index Contract"}},{"id":"ni-llms-index-45","testId":"ni-llms-index-45","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs Index Contract: Ranking Readiness","description":"Validates ranking input completeness and profile compatibility for llms-index.json presence, schema integrity, and scoring evidence. Evidence should include score and profile evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs Index Contract: Ranking Readiness appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ranking readiness evidence for llms index contract, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-index-45","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms-index.json","llm","json","ai-readiness","ranking-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms-index.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:llms-index check:45","humanCommand":"Validate llms-index.json fields against documented contract; review the ranking-readiness evidence dimension for LLMs Index Contract"}},{"id":"ni-llms-index-46","testId":"ni-llms-index-46","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs Index Contract: Network Contribution","description":"Validates PlatPhorm network contribution through discovery, integrations, and standards compliance for llms-index.json presence, schema integrity, and scoring evidence. Evidence should include network graph and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs Index Contract: Network Contribution appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the network contribution evidence for llms index contract, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-index-46","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms-index.json","llm","json","ai-readiness","network-contribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms-index.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:llms-index check:46","humanCommand":"Validate llms-index.json fields against documented contract; review the network-contribution evidence dimension for LLMs Index Contract"}},{"id":"ni-llms-index-47","testId":"ni-llms-index-47","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs Index Contract: Report Readiness","description":"Validates report/export categorization with public-safe evidence and protected boundaries for llms-index.json presence, schema integrity, and scoring evidence. Evidence should include report section mapping evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs Index Contract: Report Readiness appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the report readiness evidence for llms index contract, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-index-47","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms-index.json","llm","json","ai-readiness","report-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms-index.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:llms-index check:47","humanCommand":"Validate llms-index.json fields against documented contract; review the report-readiness evidence dimension for LLMs Index Contract"}},{"id":"ni-llms-index-48","testId":"ni-llms-index-48","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs Index Contract: Operator Actionability","description":"Validates clear remediation, owner action, difficulty, and retest path for llms-index.json presence, schema integrity, and scoring evidence. Evidence should include fix instructions and command evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs Index Contract: Operator Actionability appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the operator actionability evidence for llms index contract, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-index-48","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms-index.json","llm","json","ai-readiness","operator-actionability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms-index.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:llms-index check:48","humanCommand":"Validate llms-index.json fields against documented contract; review the operator-actionability evidence dimension for LLMs Index Contract"}},{"id":"ni-llms-index-49","testId":"ni-llms-index-49","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs Index Contract: Degraded State","description":"Validates honest degraded, unavailable, skipped, and not-applicable states for llms-index.json presence, schema integrity, and scoring evidence. Evidence should include status and storage evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs Index Contract: Degraded State appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the degraded state evidence for llms index contract, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-index-49","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms-index.json","llm","json","ai-readiness","degraded-state","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms-index.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:llms-index check:49","humanCommand":"Validate llms-index.json fields against documented contract; review the degraded-state evidence dimension for LLMs Index Contract"}},{"id":"ni-llms-index-50","testId":"ni-llms-index-50","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"LLMs Index Contract: Reproducibility","description":"Validates stable CLI/API/human reproduction path and deterministic rerun instructions for llms-index.json presence, schema integrity, and scoring evidence. Evidence should include commands and registry version evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"LLMs Index Contract: Reproducibility appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the reproducibility evidence for llms index contract, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-llms-index-50","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["llms-index.json","llm","json","ai-readiness","reproducibility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/llms-index.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:llms-index check:50","humanCommand":"Validate llms-index.json fields against documented contract; review the reproducibility evidence dimension for LLMs Index Contract"}},{"id":"ni-humans-01","testId":"ni-humans-01","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Humans.txt Transparency: Availability","description":"Validates public route availability and successful bounded fetch behavior for humans.txt availability, attribution transparency, and governance hygiene. Evidence should include HTTP status, timeout, and redirect evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Humans.txt Transparency: Availability appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the availability evidence for humans.txt transparency, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-humans-01","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["humans.txt","transparency","attribution","trust","availability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.any([fetch('https://example.com/humans.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt')]).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('missing'))\" # group:humans check:1","humanCommand":"Verify maintainers, contact, and contribution metadata in humans.txt; review the availability evidence dimension for Humans.txt Transparency"}},{"id":"ni-humans-02","testId":"ni-humans-02","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Humans.txt Transparency: Public Safety","description":"Validates public-safe access boundaries without exposing private or protected data for humans.txt availability, attribution transparency, and governance hygiene. Evidence should include route policy and response-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Humans.txt Transparency: Public Safety appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the public safety evidence for humans.txt transparency, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-humans-02","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["humans.txt","transparency","attribution","trust","public-safety","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.any([fetch('https://example.com/humans.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt')]).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('missing'))\" # group:humans check:2","humanCommand":"Verify maintainers, contact, and contribution metadata in humans.txt; review the public-safety evidence dimension for Humans.txt Transparency"}},{"id":"ni-humans-03","testId":"ni-humans-03","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Humans.txt Transparency: Canonical Url","description":"Validates canonical URL stability and normalized route identity for humans.txt availability, attribution transparency, and governance hygiene. Evidence should include canonical tags, redirects, and normalized URL evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Humans.txt Transparency: Canonical Url appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the canonical url evidence for humans.txt transparency, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-humans-03","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["humans.txt","transparency","attribution","trust","canonical-url","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.any([fetch('https://example.com/humans.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt')]).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('missing'))\" # group:humans check:3","humanCommand":"Verify maintainers, contact, and contribution metadata in humans.txt; review the canonical-url evidence dimension for Humans.txt Transparency"}},{"id":"ni-humans-04","testId":"ni-humans-04","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Humans.txt Transparency: Metadata Clarity","description":"Validates title, description, and page-specific metadata clarity for humans.txt availability, attribution transparency, and governance hygiene. Evidence should include HTML metadata and extracted text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Humans.txt Transparency: Metadata Clarity appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the metadata clarity evidence for humans.txt transparency, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-humans-04","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["humans.txt","transparency","attribution","trust","metadata-clarity","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.any([fetch('https://example.com/humans.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt')]).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('missing'))\" # group:humans check:4","humanCommand":"Verify maintainers, contact, and contribution metadata in humans.txt; review the metadata-clarity evidence dimension for Humans.txt Transparency"}},{"id":"ni-humans-05","testId":"ni-humans-05","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Humans.txt Transparency: Semantic Structure","description":"Validates semantic HTML structure for humans, agents, and assistive technology for humans.txt availability, attribution transparency, and governance hygiene. Evidence should include heading, landmark, and element evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Humans.txt Transparency: Semantic Structure appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the semantic structure evidence for humans.txt transparency, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-humans-05","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["humans.txt","transparency","attribution","trust","semantic-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.any([fetch('https://example.com/humans.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt')]).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('missing'))\" # group:humans check:5","humanCommand":"Verify maintainers, contact, and contribution metadata in humans.txt; review the semantic-structure evidence dimension for Humans.txt Transparency"}},{"id":"ni-humans-06","testId":"ni-humans-06","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Humans.txt Transparency: Machine Readability","description":"Validates machine-readable public content and predictable parsing surfaces for humans.txt availability, attribution transparency, and governance hygiene. Evidence should include structured tags, JSON-LD, and document-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Humans.txt Transparency: Machine Readability appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the machine readability evidence for humans.txt transparency, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-humans-06","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["humans.txt","transparency","attribution","trust","machine-readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.any([fetch('https://example.com/humans.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt')]).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('missing'))\" # group:humans check:6","humanCommand":"Verify maintainers, contact, and contribution metadata in humans.txt; review the machine-readability evidence dimension for Humans.txt Transparency"}},{"id":"ni-humans-07","testId":"ni-humans-07","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Humans.txt Transparency: Agent Discovery","description":"Validates agent discovery hints and AI-readable policy/documentation signals for humans.txt availability, attribution transparency, and governance hygiene. Evidence should include llms, policy, MCP, OpenAPI, or schema evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Humans.txt Transparency: Agent Discovery appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the agent discovery evidence for humans.txt transparency, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-humans-07","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["humans.txt","transparency","attribution","trust","agent-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.any([fetch('https://example.com/humans.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt')]).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('missing'))\" # group:humans check:7","humanCommand":"Verify maintainers, contact, and contribution metadata in humans.txt; review the agent-discovery evidence dimension for Humans.txt Transparency"}},{"id":"ni-humans-08","testId":"ni-humans-08","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Humans.txt Transparency: Crawler Discovery","description":"Validates crawler discovery paths through robots, sitemap, feeds, and canonical links for humans.txt availability, attribution transparency, and governance hygiene. Evidence should include discovery artifact and link evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Humans.txt Transparency: Crawler Discovery appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the crawler discovery evidence for humans.txt transparency, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-humans-08","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["humans.txt","transparency","attribution","trust","crawler-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.any([fetch('https://example.com/humans.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt')]).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('missing'))\" # group:humans check:8","humanCommand":"Verify maintainers, contact, and contribution metadata in humans.txt; review the crawler-discovery evidence dimension for Humans.txt Transparency"}},{"id":"ni-humans-09","testId":"ni-humans-09","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Humans.txt Transparency: Answerability","description":"Validates direct answer extraction and quotable explanatory content for humans.txt availability, attribution transparency, and governance hygiene. Evidence should include question, summary, heading, and paragraph evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Humans.txt Transparency: Answerability appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the answerability evidence for humans.txt transparency, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-humans-09","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["humans.txt","transparency","attribution","trust","answerability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.any([fetch('https://example.com/humans.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt')]).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('missing'))\" # group:humans check:9","humanCommand":"Verify maintainers, contact, and contribution metadata in humans.txt; review the answerability evidence dimension for Humans.txt Transparency"}},{"id":"ni-humans-10","testId":"ni-humans-10","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Humans.txt Transparency: Generative Context","description":"Validates GEO context quality for generative engines without inventing measured facts for humans.txt availability, attribution transparency, and governance hygiene. Evidence should include entity, source, and instruction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Humans.txt Transparency: Generative Context appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the generative context evidence for humans.txt transparency, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-humans-10","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["humans.txt","transparency","attribution","trust","generative-context","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.any([fetch('https://example.com/humans.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt')]).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('missing'))\" # group:humans check:10","humanCommand":"Verify maintainers, contact, and contribution metadata in humans.txt; review the generative-context evidence dimension for Humans.txt Transparency"}},{"id":"ni-humans-11","testId":"ni-humans-11","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Humans.txt Transparency: Search Intent","description":"Validates search intent alignment and snippet-friendly content structure for humans.txt availability, attribution transparency, and governance hygiene. Evidence should include metadata, headings, and topical text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Humans.txt Transparency: Search Intent appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the search intent evidence for humans.txt transparency, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-humans-11","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["humans.txt","transparency","attribution","trust","search-intent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.any([fetch('https://example.com/humans.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt')]).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('missing'))\" # group:humans check:11","humanCommand":"Verify maintainers, contact, and contribution metadata in humans.txt; review the search-intent evidence dimension for Humans.txt Transparency"}},{"id":"ni-humans-12","testId":"ni-humans-12","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Humans.txt Transparency: Accessibility Semantics","description":"Validates accessible names, relationships, landmarks, and keyboard-relevant structure for humans.txt availability, attribution transparency, and governance hygiene. Evidence should include ARIA, labels, landmarks, and control evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Humans.txt Transparency: Accessibility Semantics appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the accessibility semantics evidence for humans.txt transparency, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-humans-12","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["humans.txt","transparency","attribution","trust","accessibility-semantics","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.any([fetch('https://example.com/humans.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt')]).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('missing'))\" # group:humans check:12","humanCommand":"Verify maintainers, contact, and contribution metadata in humans.txt; review the accessibility-semantics evidence dimension for Humans.txt Transparency"}},{"id":"ni-humans-13","testId":"ni-humans-13","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Humans.txt Transparency: Mobile Readiness","description":"Validates mobile viewport, responsive content, and touch-friendly layout signals for humans.txt availability, attribution transparency, and governance hygiene. Evidence should include viewport and responsive asset evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Humans.txt Transparency: Mobile Readiness appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the mobile readiness evidence for humans.txt transparency, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-humans-13","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["humans.txt","transparency","attribution","trust","mobile-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.any([fetch('https://example.com/humans.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt')]).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('missing'))\" # group:humans check:13","humanCommand":"Verify maintainers, contact, and contribution metadata in humans.txt; review the mobile-readiness evidence dimension for Humans.txt Transparency"}},{"id":"ni-humans-14","testId":"ni-humans-14","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Humans.txt Transparency: Performance Budget","description":"Validates performance budget compliance using measured or bounded deterministic inputs for humans.txt availability, attribution transparency, and governance hygiene. Evidence should include timing, byte, and Lighthouse-derived evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Humans.txt Transparency: Performance Budget appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the performance budget evidence for humans.txt transparency, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-humans-14","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["humans.txt","transparency","attribution","trust","performance-budget","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.any([fetch('https://example.com/humans.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt')]).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('missing'))\" # group:humans check:14","humanCommand":"Verify maintainers, contact, and contribution metadata in humans.txt; review the performance-budget evidence dimension for Humans.txt Transparency"}},{"id":"ni-humans-15","testId":"ni-humans-15","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Humans.txt Transparency: Resource Efficiency","description":"Validates resource size, script/style count, and optimization opportunity signals for humans.txt availability, attribution transparency, and governance hygiene. Evidence should include resource and markup evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Humans.txt Transparency: Resource Efficiency appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the resource efficiency evidence for humans.txt transparency, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-humans-15","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["humans.txt","transparency","attribution","trust","resource-efficiency","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.any([fetch('https://example.com/humans.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt')]).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('missing'))\" # group:humans check:15","humanCommand":"Verify maintainers, contact, and contribution metadata in humans.txt; review the resource-efficiency evidence dimension for Humans.txt Transparency"}},{"id":"ni-humans-16","testId":"ni-humans-16","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Humans.txt Transparency: Cache Freshness","description":"Validates cache behavior, freshness hints, and stale-content risk for humans.txt availability, attribution transparency, and governance hygiene. Evidence should include HTTP cache and timestamp evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Humans.txt Transparency: Cache Freshness appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the cache freshness evidence for humans.txt transparency, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-humans-16","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["humans.txt","transparency","attribution","trust","cache-freshness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.any([fetch('https://example.com/humans.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt')]).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('missing'))\" # group:humans check:16","humanCommand":"Verify maintainers, contact, and contribution metadata in humans.txt; review the cache-freshness evidence dimension for Humans.txt Transparency"}},{"id":"ni-humans-17","testId":"ni-humans-17","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Humans.txt Transparency: Route Reliability","description":"Validates route reliability, redirect safety, and dead-link risk for humans.txt availability, attribution transparency, and governance hygiene. Evidence should include status, redirect, and sitemap evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Humans.txt Transparency: Route Reliability appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the route reliability evidence for humans.txt transparency, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-humans-17","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["humans.txt","transparency","attribution","trust","route-reliability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.any([fetch('https://example.com/humans.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt')]).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('missing'))\" # group:humans check:17","humanCommand":"Verify maintainers, contact, and contribution metadata in humans.txt; review the route-reliability evidence dimension for Humans.txt Transparency"}},{"id":"ni-humans-18","testId":"ni-humans-18","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Humans.txt Transparency: Feed Quality","description":"Validates RSS/Atom/feed usefulness, parseability, and freshness for humans.txt availability, attribution transparency, and governance hygiene. Evidence should include feed XML and item evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Humans.txt Transparency: Feed Quality appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the feed quality evidence for humans.txt transparency, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-humans-18","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["humans.txt","transparency","attribution","trust","feed-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.any([fetch('https://example.com/humans.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt')]).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('missing'))\" # group:humans check:18","humanCommand":"Verify maintainers, contact, and contribution metadata in humans.txt; review the feed-quality evidence dimension for Humans.txt Transparency"}},{"id":"ni-humans-19","testId":"ni-humans-19","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Humans.txt Transparency: Sitemap Quality","description":"Validates sitemap validity, public-safe URL coverage, and no-dead-link policy for humans.txt availability, attribution transparency, and governance hygiene. Evidence should include sitemap XML and bounded link-check evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Humans.txt Transparency: Sitemap Quality appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the sitemap quality evidence for humans.txt transparency, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-humans-19","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["humans.txt","transparency","attribution","trust","sitemap-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.any([fetch('https://example.com/humans.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt')]).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('missing'))\" # group:humans check:19","humanCommand":"Verify maintainers, contact, and contribution metadata in humans.txt; review the sitemap-quality evidence dimension for Humans.txt Transparency"}},{"id":"ni-humans-20","testId":"ni-humans-20","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Humans.txt Transparency: Robots Alignment","description":"Validates robots.txt alignment with public/protected policy and sitemap discovery for humans.txt availability, attribution transparency, and governance hygiene. Evidence should include robots directives and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Humans.txt Transparency: Robots Alignment appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the robots alignment evidence for humans.txt transparency, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-humans-20","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["humans.txt","transparency","attribution","trust","robots-alignment","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.any([fetch('https://example.com/humans.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt')]).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('missing'))\" # group:humans check:20","humanCommand":"Verify maintainers, contact, and contribution metadata in humans.txt; review the robots-alignment evidence dimension for Humans.txt Transparency"}},{"id":"ni-humans-21","testId":"ni-humans-21","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Humans.txt Transparency: Llms Structure","description":"Validates llms.txt structure, readability, endpoint coverage, and agent usefulness for humans.txt availability, attribution transparency, and governance hygiene. Evidence should include plain-text section and line-length evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Humans.txt Transparency: Llms Structure appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms structure evidence for humans.txt transparency, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-humans-21","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["humans.txt","transparency","attribution","trust","llms-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.any([fetch('https://example.com/humans.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt')]).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('missing'))\" # group:humans check:21","humanCommand":"Verify maintainers, contact, and contribution metadata in humans.txt; review the llms-structure evidence dimension for Humans.txt Transparency"}},{"id":"ni-humans-22","testId":"ni-humans-22","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Humans.txt Transparency: Llms Index Schema","description":"Validates llms-index JSON schema shape and count reconciliation for humans.txt availability, attribution transparency, and governance hygiene. Evidence should include JSON keys, counts, and endpoint evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Humans.txt Transparency: Llms Index Schema appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms index schema evidence for humans.txt transparency, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-humans-22","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["humans.txt","transparency","attribution","trust","llms-index-schema","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.any([fetch('https://example.com/humans.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt')]).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('missing'))\" # group:humans check:22","humanCommand":"Verify maintainers, contact, and contribution metadata in humans.txt; review the llms-index-schema evidence dimension for Humans.txt Transparency"}},{"id":"ni-humans-23","testId":"ni-humans-23","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Humans.txt Transparency: Humans Attribution","description":"Validates humans.txt attribution, maintainer, technology, and governance transparency for humans.txt availability, attribution transparency, and governance hygiene. Evidence should include humans.txt section evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Humans.txt Transparency: Humans Attribution appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the humans attribution evidence for humans.txt transparency, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-humans-23","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["humans.txt","transparency","attribution","trust","humans-attribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.any([fetch('https://example.com/humans.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt')]).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('missing'))\" # group:humans check:23","humanCommand":"Verify maintainers, contact, and contribution metadata in humans.txt; review the humans-attribution evidence dimension for Humans.txt Transparency"}},{"id":"ni-humans-24","testId":"ni-humans-24","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Humans.txt Transparency: Agent Policy","description":"Validates agent-policy JSON clarity for allowed, disallowed, and protected operations for humans.txt availability, attribution transparency, and governance hygiene. Evidence should include well-known policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Humans.txt Transparency: Agent Policy appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the agent policy evidence for humans.txt transparency, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-humans-24","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["humans.txt","transparency","attribution","trust","agent-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.any([fetch('https://example.com/humans.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt')]).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('missing'))\" # group:humans check:24","humanCommand":"Verify maintainers, contact, and contribution metadata in humans.txt; review the agent-policy evidence dimension for Humans.txt Transparency"}},{"id":"ni-humans-25","testId":"ni-humans-25","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Humans.txt Transparency: Ai Policy","description":"Validates AI policy clarity for training, search, answer use, caching, and attribution for humans.txt availability, attribution transparency, and governance hygiene. Evidence should include well-known AI policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Humans.txt Transparency: Ai Policy appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ai policy evidence for humans.txt transparency, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-humans-25","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["humans.txt","transparency","attribution","trust","ai-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.any([fetch('https://example.com/humans.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt')]).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('missing'))\" # group:humans check:25","humanCommand":"Verify maintainers, contact, and contribution metadata in humans.txt; review the ai-policy evidence dimension for Humans.txt Transparency"}},{"id":"ni-humans-26","testId":"ni-humans-26","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Humans.txt Transparency: Trust Policy","description":"Validates trust policy coverage for privacy, traceability, metadata, and protected actions for humans.txt availability, attribution transparency, and governance hygiene. Evidence should include trust.json evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Humans.txt Transparency: Trust Policy appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the trust policy evidence for humans.txt transparency, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-humans-26","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["humans.txt","transparency","attribution","trust","trust-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.any([fetch('https://example.com/humans.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt')]).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('missing'))\" # group:humans check:26","humanCommand":"Verify maintainers, contact, and contribution metadata in humans.txt; review the trust-policy evidence dimension for Humans.txt Transparency"}},{"id":"ni-humans-27","testId":"ni-humans-27","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Humans.txt Transparency: Openapi Contract","description":"Validates OpenAPI availability, server URL accuracy, schemas, and auth policy for humans.txt availability, attribution transparency, and governance hygiene. Evidence should include OpenAPI text/JSON evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Humans.txt Transparency: Openapi Contract appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the openapi contract evidence for humans.txt transparency, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-humans-27","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["humans.txt","transparency","attribution","trust","openapi-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.any([fetch('https://example.com/humans.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt')]).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('missing'))\" # group:humans check:27","humanCommand":"Verify maintainers, contact, and contribution metadata in humans.txt; review the openapi-contract evidence dimension for Humans.txt Transparency"}},{"id":"ni-humans-28","testId":"ni-humans-28","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Humans.txt Transparency: Mcp Contract","description":"Validates MCP JSON-RPC introspection, real tools, resources, and protected boundaries for humans.txt availability, attribution transparency, and governance hygiene. Evidence should include MCP manifest and initialize evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Humans.txt Transparency: Mcp Contract appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the mcp contract evidence for humans.txt transparency, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-humans-28","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["humans.txt","transparency","attribution","trust","mcp-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.any([fetch('https://example.com/humans.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt')]).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('missing'))\" # group:humans check:28","humanCommand":"Verify maintainers, contact, and contribution metadata in humans.txt; review the mcp-contract evidence dimension for Humans.txt Transparency"}},{"id":"ni-humans-29","testId":"ni-humans-29","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Humans.txt Transparency: Api Error Shape","description":"Validates API success/error response shape consistency for humans.txt availability, attribution transparency, and governance hygiene. Evidence should include REST envelope evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Humans.txt Transparency: Api Error Shape appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the api error shape evidence for humans.txt transparency, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-humans-29","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["humans.txt","transparency","attribution","trust","api-error-shape","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.any([fetch('https://example.com/humans.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt')]).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('missing'))\" # group:humans check:29","humanCommand":"Verify maintainers, contact, and contribution metadata in humans.txt; review the api-error-shape evidence dimension for Humans.txt Transparency"}},{"id":"ni-humans-30","testId":"ni-humans-30","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Humans.txt Transparency: Traceability","description":"Validates trace propagation, request IDs, and safe observability correlation for humans.txt availability, attribution transparency, and governance hygiene. Evidence should include trace header and metadata evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Humans.txt Transparency: Traceability appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the traceability evidence for humans.txt transparency, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-humans-30","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["humans.txt","transparency","attribution","trust","traceability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.any([fetch('https://example.com/humans.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt')]).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('missing'))\" # group:humans check:30","humanCommand":"Verify maintainers, contact, and contribution metadata in humans.txt; review the traceability evidence dimension for Humans.txt Transparency"}},{"id":"ni-humans-31","testId":"ni-humans-31","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Humans.txt Transparency: Ja4 Redaction","description":"Validates fingerprint-adjacent metadata redaction and non-public raw JA4 handling for humans.txt availability, attribution transparency, and governance hygiene. Evidence should include metadata policy and redaction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Humans.txt Transparency: Ja4 Redaction appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the ja4 redaction evidence for humans.txt transparency, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-humans-31","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["humans.txt","transparency","attribution","trust","ja4-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.any([fetch('https://example.com/humans.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt')]).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('missing'))\" # group:humans check:31","humanCommand":"Verify maintainers, contact, and contribution metadata in humans.txt; review the ja4-redaction evidence dimension for Humans.txt Transparency"}},{"id":"ni-humans-32","testId":"ni-humans-32","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Humans.txt Transparency: Secret Redaction","description":"Validates absence of secrets, generic key examples, cookies, and raw tokens in public outputs for humans.txt availability, attribution transparency, and governance hygiene. Evidence should include public artifact scan evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Humans.txt Transparency: Secret Redaction appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the secret redaction evidence for humans.txt transparency, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-humans-32","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["humans.txt","transparency","attribution","trust","secret-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.any([fetch('https://example.com/humans.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt')]).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('missing'))\" # group:humans check:32","humanCommand":"Verify maintainers, contact, and contribution metadata in humans.txt; review the secret-redaction evidence dimension for Humans.txt Transparency"}},{"id":"ni-humans-33","testId":"ni-humans-33","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Humans.txt Transparency: Security Headers","description":"Validates security header coverage and hardened transport signals for humans.txt availability, attribution transparency, and governance hygiene. Evidence should include HTTP header evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Humans.txt Transparency: Security Headers appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the security headers evidence for humans.txt transparency, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-humans-33","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["humans.txt","transparency","attribution","trust","security-headers","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.any([fetch('https://example.com/humans.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt')]).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('missing'))\" # group:humans check:33","humanCommand":"Verify maintainers, contact, and contribution metadata in humans.txt; review the security-headers evidence dimension for Humans.txt Transparency"}},{"id":"ni-humans-34","testId":"ni-humans-34","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Humans.txt Transparency: Privacy Consent","description":"Validates privacy policy, consent, attribution, and data-use disclosure quality for humans.txt availability, attribution transparency, and governance hygiene. Evidence should include public page and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Humans.txt Transparency: Privacy Consent appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the privacy consent evidence for humans.txt transparency, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-humans-34","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["humans.txt","transparency","attribution","trust","privacy-consent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.any([fetch('https://example.com/humans.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt')]).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('missing'))\" # group:humans check:34","humanCommand":"Verify maintainers, contact, and contribution metadata in humans.txt; review the privacy-consent evidence dimension for Humans.txt Transparency"}},{"id":"ni-humans-35","testId":"ni-humans-35","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Humans.txt Transparency: Structured Data","description":"Validates JSON-LD and entity modeling for machine interpretation for humans.txt availability, attribution transparency, and governance hygiene. Evidence should include schema block and parse evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Humans.txt Transparency: Structured Data appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the structured data evidence for humans.txt transparency, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-humans-35","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["humans.txt","transparency","attribution","trust","structured-data","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.any([fetch('https://example.com/humans.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt')]).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('missing'))\" # group:humans check:35","humanCommand":"Verify maintainers, contact, and contribution metadata in humans.txt; review the structured-data evidence dimension for Humans.txt Transparency"}},{"id":"ni-humans-36","testId":"ni-humans-36","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Humans.txt Transparency: Social Preview","description":"Validates Open Graph and Twitter/X card readiness for public sharing for humans.txt availability, attribution transparency, and governance hygiene. Evidence should include meta tag evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Humans.txt Transparency: Social Preview appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the social preview evidence for humans.txt transparency, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-humans-36","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["humans.txt","transparency","attribution","trust","social-preview","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.any([fetch('https://example.com/humans.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt')]).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('missing'))\" # group:humans check:36","humanCommand":"Verify maintainers, contact, and contribution metadata in humans.txt; review the social-preview evidence dimension for Humans.txt Transparency"}},{"id":"ni-humans-37","testId":"ni-humans-37","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Humans.txt Transparency: I18n Routing","description":"Validates locale route, hreflang, language declaration, and translation readiness for humans.txt availability, attribution transparency, and governance hygiene. Evidence should include lang/hreflang and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Humans.txt Transparency: I18n Routing appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the i18n routing evidence for humans.txt transparency, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-humans-37","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["humans.txt","transparency","attribution","trust","i18n-routing","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.any([fetch('https://example.com/humans.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt')]).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('missing'))\" # group:humans check:37","humanCommand":"Verify maintainers, contact, and contribution metadata in humans.txt; review the i18n-routing evidence dimension for Humans.txt Transparency"}},{"id":"ni-humans-38","testId":"ni-humans-38","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Humans.txt Transparency: Readability","description":"Validates human readability, sectioning, sentence complexity, and comprehension support for humans.txt availability, attribution transparency, and governance hygiene. Evidence should include extracted content evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Humans.txt Transparency: Readability appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the readability evidence for humans.txt transparency, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-humans-38","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["humans.txt","transparency","attribution","trust","readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.any([fetch('https://example.com/humans.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt')]).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('missing'))\" # group:humans check:38","humanCommand":"Verify maintainers, contact, and contribution metadata in humans.txt; review the readability evidence dimension for Humans.txt Transparency"}},{"id":"ni-humans-39","testId":"ni-humans-39","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Humans.txt Transparency: Content Utility","description":"Validates non-placeholder content usefulness and domain-specific public value for humans.txt availability, attribution transparency, and governance hygiene. Evidence should include content extraction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Humans.txt Transparency: Content Utility appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the content utility evidence for humans.txt transparency, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-humans-39","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["humans.txt","transparency","attribution","trust","content-utility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.any([fetch('https://example.com/humans.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt')]).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('missing'))\" # group:humans check:39","humanCommand":"Verify maintainers, contact, and contribution metadata in humans.txt; review the content-utility evidence dimension for Humans.txt Transparency"}},{"id":"ni-humans-40","testId":"ni-humans-40","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Humans.txt Transparency: Recommendation Grounding","description":"Validates recommendation grounding in deterministic evidence instead of fabricated model output for humans.txt availability, attribution transparency, and governance hygiene. Evidence should include issue and remediation evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Humans.txt Transparency: Recommendation Grounding appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the recommendation grounding evidence for humans.txt transparency, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-humans-40","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["humans.txt","transparency","attribution","trust","recommendation-grounding","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.any([fetch('https://example.com/humans.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt')]).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('missing'))\" # group:humans check:40","humanCommand":"Verify maintainers, contact, and contribution metadata in humans.txt; review the recommendation-grounding evidence dimension for Humans.txt Transparency"}},{"id":"ni-humans-41","testId":"ni-humans-41","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Humans.txt Transparency: Evidence Quality","description":"Validates evidence completeness, public safety, and reproducibility for humans.txt availability, attribution transparency, and governance hygiene. Evidence should include test output and artifact evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Humans.txt Transparency: Evidence Quality appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the evidence quality evidence for humans.txt transparency, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-humans-41","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["humans.txt","transparency","attribution","trust","evidence-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.any([fetch('https://example.com/humans.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt')]).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('missing'))\" # group:humans check:41","humanCommand":"Verify maintainers, contact, and contribution metadata in humans.txt; review the evidence-quality evidence dimension for Humans.txt Transparency"}},{"id":"ni-humans-42","testId":"ni-humans-42","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Humans.txt Transparency: Threshold Policy","description":"Validates threshold clarity, pass/warn/fail semantics, and scoring transparency for humans.txt availability, attribution transparency, and governance hygiene. Evidence should include threshold and result status evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Humans.txt Transparency: Threshold Policy appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the threshold policy evidence for humans.txt transparency, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-humans-42","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["humans.txt","transparency","attribution","trust","threshold-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.any([fetch('https://example.com/humans.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt')]).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('missing'))\" # group:humans check:42","humanCommand":"Verify maintainers, contact, and contribution metadata in humans.txt; review the threshold-policy evidence dimension for Humans.txt Transparency"}},{"id":"ni-humans-43","testId":"ni-humans-43","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Humans.txt Transparency: Confidence","description":"Validates confidence scoring and degraded-input disclosure for humans.txt availability, attribution transparency, and governance hygiene. Evidence should include source freshness and input availability evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Humans.txt Transparency: Confidence appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the confidence evidence for humans.txt transparency, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-humans-43","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["humans.txt","transparency","attribution","trust","confidence","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.any([fetch('https://example.com/humans.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt')]).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('missing'))\" # group:humans check:43","humanCommand":"Verify maintainers, contact, and contribution metadata in humans.txt; review the confidence evidence dimension for Humans.txt Transparency"}},{"id":"ni-humans-44","testId":"ni-humans-44","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Humans.txt Transparency: Trend Readiness","description":"Validates historical comparability and timeline readiness for future reruns for humans.txt availability, attribution transparency, and governance hygiene. Evidence should include analysis ID, timestamp, and persistence evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Humans.txt Transparency: Trend Readiness appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the trend readiness evidence for humans.txt transparency, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-humans-44","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["humans.txt","transparency","attribution","trust","trend-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.any([fetch('https://example.com/humans.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt')]).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('missing'))\" # group:humans check:44","humanCommand":"Verify maintainers, contact, and contribution metadata in humans.txt; review the trend-readiness evidence dimension for Humans.txt Transparency"}},{"id":"ni-humans-45","testId":"ni-humans-45","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Humans.txt Transparency: Ranking Readiness","description":"Validates ranking input completeness and profile compatibility for humans.txt availability, attribution transparency, and governance hygiene. Evidence should include score and profile evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Humans.txt Transparency: Ranking Readiness appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ranking readiness evidence for humans.txt transparency, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-humans-45","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["humans.txt","transparency","attribution","trust","ranking-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.any([fetch('https://example.com/humans.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt')]).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('missing'))\" # group:humans check:45","humanCommand":"Verify maintainers, contact, and contribution metadata in humans.txt; review the ranking-readiness evidence dimension for Humans.txt Transparency"}},{"id":"ni-humans-46","testId":"ni-humans-46","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Humans.txt Transparency: Network Contribution","description":"Validates PlatPhorm network contribution through discovery, integrations, and standards compliance for humans.txt availability, attribution transparency, and governance hygiene. Evidence should include network graph and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Humans.txt Transparency: Network Contribution appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the network contribution evidence for humans.txt transparency, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-humans-46","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["humans.txt","transparency","attribution","trust","network-contribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.any([fetch('https://example.com/humans.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt')]).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('missing'))\" # group:humans check:46","humanCommand":"Verify maintainers, contact, and contribution metadata in humans.txt; review the network-contribution evidence dimension for Humans.txt Transparency"}},{"id":"ni-humans-47","testId":"ni-humans-47","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Humans.txt Transparency: Report Readiness","description":"Validates report/export categorization with public-safe evidence and protected boundaries for humans.txt availability, attribution transparency, and governance hygiene. Evidence should include report section mapping evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Humans.txt Transparency: Report Readiness appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the report readiness evidence for humans.txt transparency, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-humans-47","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["humans.txt","transparency","attribution","trust","report-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.any([fetch('https://example.com/humans.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt')]).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('missing'))\" # group:humans check:47","humanCommand":"Verify maintainers, contact, and contribution metadata in humans.txt; review the report-readiness evidence dimension for Humans.txt Transparency"}},{"id":"ni-humans-48","testId":"ni-humans-48","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Humans.txt Transparency: Operator Actionability","description":"Validates clear remediation, owner action, difficulty, and retest path for humans.txt availability, attribution transparency, and governance hygiene. Evidence should include fix instructions and command evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Humans.txt Transparency: Operator Actionability appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the operator actionability evidence for humans.txt transparency, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-humans-48","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["humans.txt","transparency","attribution","trust","operator-actionability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.any([fetch('https://example.com/humans.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt')]).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('missing'))\" # group:humans check:48","humanCommand":"Verify maintainers, contact, and contribution metadata in humans.txt; review the operator-actionability evidence dimension for Humans.txt Transparency"}},{"id":"ni-humans-49","testId":"ni-humans-49","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Humans.txt Transparency: Degraded State","description":"Validates honest degraded, unavailable, skipped, and not-applicable states for humans.txt availability, attribution transparency, and governance hygiene. Evidence should include status and storage evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Humans.txt Transparency: Degraded State appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the degraded state evidence for humans.txt transparency, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-humans-49","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["humans.txt","transparency","attribution","trust","degraded-state","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.any([fetch('https://example.com/humans.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt')]).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('missing'))\" # group:humans check:49","humanCommand":"Verify maintainers, contact, and contribution metadata in humans.txt; review the degraded-state evidence dimension for Humans.txt Transparency"}},{"id":"ni-humans-50","testId":"ni-humans-50","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Humans.txt Transparency: Reproducibility","description":"Validates stable CLI/API/human reproduction path and deterministic rerun instructions for humans.txt availability, attribution transparency, and governance hygiene. Evidence should include commands and registry version evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Humans.txt Transparency: Reproducibility appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the reproducibility evidence for humans.txt transparency, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-humans-50","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["humans.txt","transparency","attribution","trust","reproducibility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.any([fetch('https://example.com/humans.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt')]).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('missing'))\" # group:humans check:50","humanCommand":"Verify maintainers, contact, and contribution metadata in humans.txt; review the reproducibility evidence dimension for Humans.txt Transparency"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-01","testId":"ni-sitemap-01","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Availability","description":"Validates public route availability and successful bounded fetch behavior for sitemap.xml reachability, validity, freshness, and route discoverability. Evidence should include HTTP status, timeout, and redirect evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Availability appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the availability evidence for sitemap xml coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-01","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap.xml","seo","discovery","crawlability","availability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap check:1","humanCommand":"Confirm sitemap.xml includes canonical, indexable routes only; review the availability evidence dimension for Sitemap XML Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-02","testId":"ni-sitemap-02","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Public Safety","description":"Validates public-safe access boundaries without exposing private or protected data for sitemap.xml reachability, validity, freshness, and route discoverability. Evidence should include route policy and response-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Public Safety appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the public safety evidence for sitemap xml coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-02","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap.xml","seo","discovery","crawlability","public-safety","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap check:2","humanCommand":"Confirm sitemap.xml includes canonical, indexable routes only; review the public-safety evidence dimension for Sitemap XML Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-03","testId":"ni-sitemap-03","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Canonical Url","description":"Validates canonical URL stability and normalized route identity for sitemap.xml reachability, validity, freshness, and route discoverability. Evidence should include canonical tags, redirects, and normalized URL evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Canonical Url appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the canonical url evidence for sitemap xml coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-03","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap.xml","seo","discovery","crawlability","canonical-url","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap check:3","humanCommand":"Confirm sitemap.xml includes canonical, indexable routes only; review the canonical-url evidence dimension for Sitemap XML Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-04","testId":"ni-sitemap-04","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Metadata Clarity","description":"Validates title, description, and page-specific metadata clarity for sitemap.xml reachability, validity, freshness, and route discoverability. Evidence should include HTML metadata and extracted text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Metadata Clarity appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the metadata clarity evidence for sitemap xml coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-04","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap.xml","seo","discovery","crawlability","metadata-clarity","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap check:4","humanCommand":"Confirm sitemap.xml includes canonical, indexable routes only; review the metadata-clarity evidence dimension for Sitemap XML Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-05","testId":"ni-sitemap-05","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Semantic Structure","description":"Validates semantic HTML structure for humans, agents, and assistive technology for sitemap.xml reachability, validity, freshness, and route discoverability. Evidence should include heading, landmark, and element evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Semantic Structure appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the semantic structure evidence for sitemap xml coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-05","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap.xml","seo","discovery","crawlability","semantic-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap check:5","humanCommand":"Confirm sitemap.xml includes canonical, indexable routes only; review the semantic-structure evidence dimension for Sitemap XML Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-06","testId":"ni-sitemap-06","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Machine Readability","description":"Validates machine-readable public content and predictable parsing surfaces for sitemap.xml reachability, validity, freshness, and route discoverability. Evidence should include structured tags, JSON-LD, and document-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Machine Readability appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the machine readability evidence for sitemap xml coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-06","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap.xml","seo","discovery","crawlability","machine-readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap check:6","humanCommand":"Confirm sitemap.xml includes canonical, indexable routes only; review the machine-readability evidence dimension for Sitemap XML Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-07","testId":"ni-sitemap-07","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Agent Discovery","description":"Validates agent discovery hints and AI-readable policy/documentation signals for sitemap.xml reachability, validity, freshness, and route discoverability. Evidence should include llms, policy, MCP, OpenAPI, or schema evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Agent Discovery appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the agent discovery evidence for sitemap xml coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-07","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap.xml","seo","discovery","crawlability","agent-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap check:7","humanCommand":"Confirm sitemap.xml includes canonical, indexable routes only; review the agent-discovery evidence dimension for Sitemap XML Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-08","testId":"ni-sitemap-08","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Crawler Discovery","description":"Validates crawler discovery paths through robots, sitemap, feeds, and canonical links for sitemap.xml reachability, validity, freshness, and route discoverability. Evidence should include discovery artifact and link evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Crawler Discovery appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the crawler discovery evidence for sitemap xml coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-08","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap.xml","seo","discovery","crawlability","crawler-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap check:8","humanCommand":"Confirm sitemap.xml includes canonical, indexable routes only; review the crawler-discovery evidence dimension for Sitemap XML Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-09","testId":"ni-sitemap-09","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Answerability","description":"Validates direct answer extraction and quotable explanatory content for sitemap.xml reachability, validity, freshness, and route discoverability. Evidence should include question, summary, heading, and paragraph evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Answerability appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the answerability evidence for sitemap xml coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-09","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap.xml","seo","discovery","crawlability","answerability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap check:9","humanCommand":"Confirm sitemap.xml includes canonical, indexable routes only; review the answerability evidence dimension for Sitemap XML Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-10","testId":"ni-sitemap-10","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Generative Context","description":"Validates GEO context quality for generative engines without inventing measured facts for sitemap.xml reachability, validity, freshness, and route discoverability. Evidence should include entity, source, and instruction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Generative Context appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the generative context evidence for sitemap xml coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-10","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap.xml","seo","discovery","crawlability","generative-context","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap check:10","humanCommand":"Confirm sitemap.xml includes canonical, indexable routes only; review the generative-context evidence dimension for Sitemap XML Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-11","testId":"ni-sitemap-11","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Search Intent","description":"Validates search intent alignment and snippet-friendly content structure for sitemap.xml reachability, validity, freshness, and route discoverability. Evidence should include metadata, headings, and topical text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Search Intent appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the search intent evidence for sitemap xml coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-11","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap.xml","seo","discovery","crawlability","search-intent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap check:11","humanCommand":"Confirm sitemap.xml includes canonical, indexable routes only; review the search-intent evidence dimension for Sitemap XML Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-12","testId":"ni-sitemap-12","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Accessibility Semantics","description":"Validates accessible names, relationships, landmarks, and keyboard-relevant structure for sitemap.xml reachability, validity, freshness, and route discoverability. Evidence should include ARIA, labels, landmarks, and control evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Accessibility Semantics appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the accessibility semantics evidence for sitemap xml coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-12","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap.xml","seo","discovery","crawlability","accessibility-semantics","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap check:12","humanCommand":"Confirm sitemap.xml includes canonical, indexable routes only; review the accessibility-semantics evidence dimension for Sitemap XML Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-13","testId":"ni-sitemap-13","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Mobile Readiness","description":"Validates mobile viewport, responsive content, and touch-friendly layout signals for sitemap.xml reachability, validity, freshness, and route discoverability. Evidence should include viewport and responsive asset evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Mobile Readiness appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the mobile readiness evidence for sitemap xml coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-13","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap.xml","seo","discovery","crawlability","mobile-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap check:13","humanCommand":"Confirm sitemap.xml includes canonical, indexable routes only; review the mobile-readiness evidence dimension for Sitemap XML Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-14","testId":"ni-sitemap-14","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Performance Budget","description":"Validates performance budget compliance using measured or bounded deterministic inputs for sitemap.xml reachability, validity, freshness, and route discoverability. Evidence should include timing, byte, and Lighthouse-derived evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Performance Budget appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the performance budget evidence for sitemap xml coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-14","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap.xml","seo","discovery","crawlability","performance-budget","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap check:14","humanCommand":"Confirm sitemap.xml includes canonical, indexable routes only; review the performance-budget evidence dimension for Sitemap XML Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-15","testId":"ni-sitemap-15","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Resource Efficiency","description":"Validates resource size, script/style count, and optimization opportunity signals for sitemap.xml reachability, validity, freshness, and route discoverability. Evidence should include resource and markup evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Resource Efficiency appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the resource efficiency evidence for sitemap xml coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-15","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap.xml","seo","discovery","crawlability","resource-efficiency","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap check:15","humanCommand":"Confirm sitemap.xml includes canonical, indexable routes only; review the resource-efficiency evidence dimension for Sitemap XML Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-16","testId":"ni-sitemap-16","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Cache Freshness","description":"Validates cache behavior, freshness hints, and stale-content risk for sitemap.xml reachability, validity, freshness, and route discoverability. Evidence should include HTTP cache and timestamp evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Cache Freshness appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the cache freshness evidence for sitemap xml coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-16","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap.xml","seo","discovery","crawlability","cache-freshness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap check:16","humanCommand":"Confirm sitemap.xml includes canonical, indexable routes only; review the cache-freshness evidence dimension for Sitemap XML Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-17","testId":"ni-sitemap-17","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Route Reliability","description":"Validates route reliability, redirect safety, and dead-link risk for sitemap.xml reachability, validity, freshness, and route discoverability. Evidence should include status, redirect, and sitemap evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Route Reliability appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the route reliability evidence for sitemap xml coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-17","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap.xml","seo","discovery","crawlability","route-reliability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap check:17","humanCommand":"Confirm sitemap.xml includes canonical, indexable routes only; review the route-reliability evidence dimension for Sitemap XML Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-18","testId":"ni-sitemap-18","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Feed Quality","description":"Validates RSS/Atom/feed usefulness, parseability, and freshness for sitemap.xml reachability, validity, freshness, and route discoverability. Evidence should include feed XML and item evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Feed Quality appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the feed quality evidence for sitemap xml coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-18","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap.xml","seo","discovery","crawlability","feed-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap check:18","humanCommand":"Confirm sitemap.xml includes canonical, indexable routes only; review the feed-quality evidence dimension for Sitemap XML Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-19","testId":"ni-sitemap-19","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Sitemap Quality","description":"Validates sitemap validity, public-safe URL coverage, and no-dead-link policy for sitemap.xml reachability, validity, freshness, and route discoverability. Evidence should include sitemap XML and bounded link-check evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Sitemap Quality appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the sitemap quality evidence for sitemap xml coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-19","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap.xml","seo","discovery","crawlability","sitemap-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap check:19","humanCommand":"Confirm sitemap.xml includes canonical, indexable routes only; review the sitemap-quality evidence dimension for Sitemap XML Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-20","testId":"ni-sitemap-20","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Robots Alignment","description":"Validates robots.txt alignment with public/protected policy and sitemap discovery for sitemap.xml reachability, validity, freshness, and route discoverability. Evidence should include robots directives and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Robots Alignment appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the robots alignment evidence for sitemap xml coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-20","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap.xml","seo","discovery","crawlability","robots-alignment","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap check:20","humanCommand":"Confirm sitemap.xml includes canonical, indexable routes only; review the robots-alignment evidence dimension for Sitemap XML Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-21","testId":"ni-sitemap-21","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Llms Structure","description":"Validates llms.txt structure, readability, endpoint coverage, and agent usefulness for sitemap.xml reachability, validity, freshness, and route discoverability. Evidence should include plain-text section and line-length evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Llms Structure appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms structure evidence for sitemap xml coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-21","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap.xml","seo","discovery","crawlability","llms-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap check:21","humanCommand":"Confirm sitemap.xml includes canonical, indexable routes only; review the llms-structure evidence dimension for Sitemap XML Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-22","testId":"ni-sitemap-22","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Llms Index Schema","description":"Validates llms-index JSON schema shape and count reconciliation for sitemap.xml reachability, validity, freshness, and route discoverability. Evidence should include JSON keys, counts, and endpoint evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Llms Index Schema appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms index schema evidence for sitemap xml coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-22","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap.xml","seo","discovery","crawlability","llms-index-schema","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap check:22","humanCommand":"Confirm sitemap.xml includes canonical, indexable routes only; review the llms-index-schema evidence dimension for Sitemap XML Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-23","testId":"ni-sitemap-23","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Humans Attribution","description":"Validates humans.txt attribution, maintainer, technology, and governance transparency for sitemap.xml reachability, validity, freshness, and route discoverability. Evidence should include humans.txt section evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Humans Attribution appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the humans attribution evidence for sitemap xml coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-23","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap.xml","seo","discovery","crawlability","humans-attribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap check:23","humanCommand":"Confirm sitemap.xml includes canonical, indexable routes only; review the humans-attribution evidence dimension for Sitemap XML Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-24","testId":"ni-sitemap-24","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Agent Policy","description":"Validates agent-policy JSON clarity for allowed, disallowed, and protected operations for sitemap.xml reachability, validity, freshness, and route discoverability. Evidence should include well-known policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Agent Policy appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the agent policy evidence for sitemap xml coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-24","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap.xml","seo","discovery","crawlability","agent-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap check:24","humanCommand":"Confirm sitemap.xml includes canonical, indexable routes only; review the agent-policy evidence dimension for Sitemap XML Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-25","testId":"ni-sitemap-25","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Ai Policy","description":"Validates AI policy clarity for training, search, answer use, caching, and attribution for sitemap.xml reachability, validity, freshness, and route discoverability. Evidence should include well-known AI policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Ai Policy appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ai policy evidence for sitemap xml coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-25","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap.xml","seo","discovery","crawlability","ai-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap check:25","humanCommand":"Confirm sitemap.xml includes canonical, indexable routes only; review the ai-policy evidence dimension for Sitemap XML Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-26","testId":"ni-sitemap-26","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Trust Policy","description":"Validates trust policy coverage for privacy, traceability, metadata, and protected actions for sitemap.xml reachability, validity, freshness, and route discoverability. Evidence should include trust.json evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Trust Policy appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the trust policy evidence for sitemap xml coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-26","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap.xml","seo","discovery","crawlability","trust-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap check:26","humanCommand":"Confirm sitemap.xml includes canonical, indexable routes only; review the trust-policy evidence dimension for Sitemap XML Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-27","testId":"ni-sitemap-27","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Openapi Contract","description":"Validates OpenAPI availability, server URL accuracy, schemas, and auth policy for sitemap.xml reachability, validity, freshness, and route discoverability. Evidence should include OpenAPI text/JSON evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Openapi Contract appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the openapi contract evidence for sitemap xml coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-27","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap.xml","seo","discovery","crawlability","openapi-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap check:27","humanCommand":"Confirm sitemap.xml includes canonical, indexable routes only; review the openapi-contract evidence dimension for Sitemap XML Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-28","testId":"ni-sitemap-28","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Mcp Contract","description":"Validates MCP JSON-RPC introspection, real tools, resources, and protected boundaries for sitemap.xml reachability, validity, freshness, and route discoverability. Evidence should include MCP manifest and initialize evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Mcp Contract appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the mcp contract evidence for sitemap xml coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-28","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap.xml","seo","discovery","crawlability","mcp-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap check:28","humanCommand":"Confirm sitemap.xml includes canonical, indexable routes only; review the mcp-contract evidence dimension for Sitemap XML Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-29","testId":"ni-sitemap-29","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Api Error Shape","description":"Validates API success/error response shape consistency for sitemap.xml reachability, validity, freshness, and route discoverability. Evidence should include REST envelope evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Api Error Shape appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the api error shape evidence for sitemap xml coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-29","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap.xml","seo","discovery","crawlability","api-error-shape","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap check:29","humanCommand":"Confirm sitemap.xml includes canonical, indexable routes only; review the api-error-shape evidence dimension for Sitemap XML Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-30","testId":"ni-sitemap-30","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Traceability","description":"Validates trace propagation, request IDs, and safe observability correlation for sitemap.xml reachability, validity, freshness, and route discoverability. Evidence should include trace header and metadata evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Traceability appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the traceability evidence for sitemap xml coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-30","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap.xml","seo","discovery","crawlability","traceability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap check:30","humanCommand":"Confirm sitemap.xml includes canonical, indexable routes only; review the traceability evidence dimension for Sitemap XML Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-31","testId":"ni-sitemap-31","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Ja4 Redaction","description":"Validates fingerprint-adjacent metadata redaction and non-public raw JA4 handling for sitemap.xml reachability, validity, freshness, and route discoverability. Evidence should include metadata policy and redaction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Ja4 Redaction appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the ja4 redaction evidence for sitemap xml coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-31","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap.xml","seo","discovery","crawlability","ja4-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap check:31","humanCommand":"Confirm sitemap.xml includes canonical, indexable routes only; review the ja4-redaction evidence dimension for Sitemap XML Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-32","testId":"ni-sitemap-32","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Secret Redaction","description":"Validates absence of secrets, generic key examples, cookies, and raw tokens in public outputs for sitemap.xml reachability, validity, freshness, and route discoverability. Evidence should include public artifact scan evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Secret Redaction appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the secret redaction evidence for sitemap xml coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-32","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap.xml","seo","discovery","crawlability","secret-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap check:32","humanCommand":"Confirm sitemap.xml includes canonical, indexable routes only; review the secret-redaction evidence dimension for Sitemap XML Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-33","testId":"ni-sitemap-33","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Security Headers","description":"Validates security header coverage and hardened transport signals for sitemap.xml reachability, validity, freshness, and route discoverability. Evidence should include HTTP header evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Security Headers appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the security headers evidence for sitemap xml coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-33","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap.xml","seo","discovery","crawlability","security-headers","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap check:33","humanCommand":"Confirm sitemap.xml includes canonical, indexable routes only; review the security-headers evidence dimension for Sitemap XML Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-34","testId":"ni-sitemap-34","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Privacy Consent","description":"Validates privacy policy, consent, attribution, and data-use disclosure quality for sitemap.xml reachability, validity, freshness, and route discoverability. Evidence should include public page and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Privacy Consent appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the privacy consent evidence for sitemap xml coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-34","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap.xml","seo","discovery","crawlability","privacy-consent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap check:34","humanCommand":"Confirm sitemap.xml includes canonical, indexable routes only; review the privacy-consent evidence dimension for Sitemap XML Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-35","testId":"ni-sitemap-35","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Structured Data","description":"Validates JSON-LD and entity modeling for machine interpretation for sitemap.xml reachability, validity, freshness, and route discoverability. Evidence should include schema block and parse evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Structured Data appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the structured data evidence for sitemap xml coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-35","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap.xml","seo","discovery","crawlability","structured-data","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap check:35","humanCommand":"Confirm sitemap.xml includes canonical, indexable routes only; review the structured-data evidence dimension for Sitemap XML Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-36","testId":"ni-sitemap-36","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Social Preview","description":"Validates Open Graph and Twitter/X card readiness for public sharing for sitemap.xml reachability, validity, freshness, and route discoverability. Evidence should include meta tag evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Social Preview appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the social preview evidence for sitemap xml coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-36","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap.xml","seo","discovery","crawlability","social-preview","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap check:36","humanCommand":"Confirm sitemap.xml includes canonical, indexable routes only; review the social-preview evidence dimension for Sitemap XML Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-37","testId":"ni-sitemap-37","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap XML Coverage: I18n Routing","description":"Validates locale route, hreflang, language declaration, and translation readiness for sitemap.xml reachability, validity, freshness, and route discoverability. Evidence should include lang/hreflang and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap XML Coverage: I18n Routing appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the i18n routing evidence for sitemap xml coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-37","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap.xml","seo","discovery","crawlability","i18n-routing","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap check:37","humanCommand":"Confirm sitemap.xml includes canonical, indexable routes only; review the i18n-routing evidence dimension for Sitemap XML Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-38","testId":"ni-sitemap-38","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Readability","description":"Validates human readability, sectioning, sentence complexity, and comprehension support for sitemap.xml reachability, validity, freshness, and route discoverability. Evidence should include extracted content evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Readability appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the readability evidence for sitemap xml coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-38","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap.xml","seo","discovery","crawlability","readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap check:38","humanCommand":"Confirm sitemap.xml includes canonical, indexable routes only; review the readability evidence dimension for Sitemap XML Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-39","testId":"ni-sitemap-39","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Content Utility","description":"Validates non-placeholder content usefulness and domain-specific public value for sitemap.xml reachability, validity, freshness, and route discoverability. Evidence should include content extraction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Content Utility appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the content utility evidence for sitemap xml coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-39","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap.xml","seo","discovery","crawlability","content-utility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap check:39","humanCommand":"Confirm sitemap.xml includes canonical, indexable routes only; review the content-utility evidence dimension for Sitemap XML Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-40","testId":"ni-sitemap-40","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Recommendation Grounding","description":"Validates recommendation grounding in deterministic evidence instead of fabricated model output for sitemap.xml reachability, validity, freshness, and route discoverability. Evidence should include issue and remediation evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Recommendation Grounding appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the recommendation grounding evidence for sitemap xml coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-40","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap.xml","seo","discovery","crawlability","recommendation-grounding","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap check:40","humanCommand":"Confirm sitemap.xml includes canonical, indexable routes only; review the recommendation-grounding evidence dimension for Sitemap XML Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-41","testId":"ni-sitemap-41","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Evidence Quality","description":"Validates evidence completeness, public safety, and reproducibility for sitemap.xml reachability, validity, freshness, and route discoverability. Evidence should include test output and artifact evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Evidence Quality appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the evidence quality evidence for sitemap xml coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-41","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap.xml","seo","discovery","crawlability","evidence-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap check:41","humanCommand":"Confirm sitemap.xml includes canonical, indexable routes only; review the evidence-quality evidence dimension for Sitemap XML Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-42","testId":"ni-sitemap-42","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Threshold Policy","description":"Validates threshold clarity, pass/warn/fail semantics, and scoring transparency for sitemap.xml reachability, validity, freshness, and route discoverability. Evidence should include threshold and result status evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Threshold Policy appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the threshold policy evidence for sitemap xml coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-42","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap.xml","seo","discovery","crawlability","threshold-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap check:42","humanCommand":"Confirm sitemap.xml includes canonical, indexable routes only; review the threshold-policy evidence dimension for Sitemap XML Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-43","testId":"ni-sitemap-43","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Confidence","description":"Validates confidence scoring and degraded-input disclosure for sitemap.xml reachability, validity, freshness, and route discoverability. Evidence should include source freshness and input availability evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Confidence appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the confidence evidence for sitemap xml coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-43","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap.xml","seo","discovery","crawlability","confidence","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap check:43","humanCommand":"Confirm sitemap.xml includes canonical, indexable routes only; review the confidence evidence dimension for Sitemap XML Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-44","testId":"ni-sitemap-44","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Trend Readiness","description":"Validates historical comparability and timeline readiness for future reruns for sitemap.xml reachability, validity, freshness, and route discoverability. Evidence should include analysis ID, timestamp, and persistence evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Trend Readiness appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the trend readiness evidence for sitemap xml coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-44","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap.xml","seo","discovery","crawlability","trend-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap check:44","humanCommand":"Confirm sitemap.xml includes canonical, indexable routes only; review the trend-readiness evidence dimension for Sitemap XML Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-45","testId":"ni-sitemap-45","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Ranking Readiness","description":"Validates ranking input completeness and profile compatibility for sitemap.xml reachability, validity, freshness, and route discoverability. Evidence should include score and profile evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Ranking Readiness appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ranking readiness evidence for sitemap xml coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-45","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap.xml","seo","discovery","crawlability","ranking-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap check:45","humanCommand":"Confirm sitemap.xml includes canonical, indexable routes only; review the ranking-readiness evidence dimension for Sitemap XML Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-46","testId":"ni-sitemap-46","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Network Contribution","description":"Validates PlatPhorm network contribution through discovery, integrations, and standards compliance for sitemap.xml reachability, validity, freshness, and route discoverability. Evidence should include network graph and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Network Contribution appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the network contribution evidence for sitemap xml coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-46","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap.xml","seo","discovery","crawlability","network-contribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap check:46","humanCommand":"Confirm sitemap.xml includes canonical, indexable routes only; review the network-contribution evidence dimension for Sitemap XML Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-47","testId":"ni-sitemap-47","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Report Readiness","description":"Validates report/export categorization with public-safe evidence and protected boundaries for sitemap.xml reachability, validity, freshness, and route discoverability. Evidence should include report section mapping evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Report Readiness appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the report readiness evidence for sitemap xml coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-47","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap.xml","seo","discovery","crawlability","report-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap check:47","humanCommand":"Confirm sitemap.xml includes canonical, indexable routes only; review the report-readiness evidence dimension for Sitemap XML Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-48","testId":"ni-sitemap-48","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Operator Actionability","description":"Validates clear remediation, owner action, difficulty, and retest path for sitemap.xml reachability, validity, freshness, and route discoverability. Evidence should include fix instructions and command evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Operator Actionability appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the operator actionability evidence for sitemap xml coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-48","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap.xml","seo","discovery","crawlability","operator-actionability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap check:48","humanCommand":"Confirm sitemap.xml includes canonical, indexable routes only; review the operator-actionability evidence dimension for Sitemap XML Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-49","testId":"ni-sitemap-49","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Degraded State","description":"Validates honest degraded, unavailable, skipped, and not-applicable states for sitemap.xml reachability, validity, freshness, and route discoverability. Evidence should include status and storage evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Degraded State appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the degraded state evidence for sitemap xml coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-49","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap.xml","seo","discovery","crawlability","degraded-state","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap check:49","humanCommand":"Confirm sitemap.xml includes canonical, indexable routes only; review the degraded-state evidence dimension for Sitemap XML Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-50","testId":"ni-sitemap-50","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Reproducibility","description":"Validates stable CLI/API/human reproduction path and deterministic rerun instructions for sitemap.xml reachability, validity, freshness, and route discoverability. Evidence should include commands and registry version evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap XML Coverage: Reproducibility appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the reproducibility evidence for sitemap xml coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-50","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap.xml","seo","discovery","crawlability","reproducibility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap check:50","humanCommand":"Confirm sitemap.xml includes canonical, indexable routes only; review the reproducibility evidence dimension for Sitemap XML Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-main-01","testId":"ni-sitemap-main-01","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Availability","description":"Validates public route availability and successful bounded fetch behavior for sitemap-main.xml availability, indexing hints, and URL integrity. Evidence should include HTTP status, timeout, and redirect evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Availability appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the availability evidence for sitemap main coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-main-01","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap-main.xml","seo","indexing","discovery","availability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap-main.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')||xml.includes('<sitemapindex')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap-main check:1","humanCommand":"Validate sitemap-main.xml partitions and update cadence; review the availability evidence dimension for Sitemap Main Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-main-02","testId":"ni-sitemap-main-02","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Public Safety","description":"Validates public-safe access boundaries without exposing private or protected data for sitemap-main.xml availability, indexing hints, and URL integrity. Evidence should include route policy and response-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Public Safety appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the public safety evidence for sitemap main coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-main-02","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap-main.xml","seo","indexing","discovery","public-safety","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap-main.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')||xml.includes('<sitemapindex')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap-main check:2","humanCommand":"Validate sitemap-main.xml partitions and update cadence; review the public-safety evidence dimension for Sitemap Main Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-main-03","testId":"ni-sitemap-main-03","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Canonical Url","description":"Validates canonical URL stability and normalized route identity for sitemap-main.xml availability, indexing hints, and URL integrity. Evidence should include canonical tags, redirects, and normalized URL evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Canonical Url appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the canonical url evidence for sitemap main coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-main-03","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap-main.xml","seo","indexing","discovery","canonical-url","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap-main.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')||xml.includes('<sitemapindex')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap-main check:3","humanCommand":"Validate sitemap-main.xml partitions and update cadence; review the canonical-url evidence dimension for Sitemap Main Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-main-04","testId":"ni-sitemap-main-04","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Metadata Clarity","description":"Validates title, description, and page-specific metadata clarity for sitemap-main.xml availability, indexing hints, and URL integrity. Evidence should include HTML metadata and extracted text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Metadata Clarity appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the metadata clarity evidence for sitemap main coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-main-04","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap-main.xml","seo","indexing","discovery","metadata-clarity","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap-main.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')||xml.includes('<sitemapindex')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap-main check:4","humanCommand":"Validate sitemap-main.xml partitions and update cadence; review the metadata-clarity evidence dimension for Sitemap Main Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-main-05","testId":"ni-sitemap-main-05","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Semantic Structure","description":"Validates semantic HTML structure for humans, agents, and assistive technology for sitemap-main.xml availability, indexing hints, and URL integrity. Evidence should include heading, landmark, and element evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Semantic Structure appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the semantic structure evidence for sitemap main coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-main-05","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap-main.xml","seo","indexing","discovery","semantic-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap-main.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')||xml.includes('<sitemapindex')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap-main check:5","humanCommand":"Validate sitemap-main.xml partitions and update cadence; review the semantic-structure evidence dimension for Sitemap Main Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-main-06","testId":"ni-sitemap-main-06","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Machine Readability","description":"Validates machine-readable public content and predictable parsing surfaces for sitemap-main.xml availability, indexing hints, and URL integrity. Evidence should include structured tags, JSON-LD, and document-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Machine Readability appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the machine readability evidence for sitemap main coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-main-06","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap-main.xml","seo","indexing","discovery","machine-readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap-main.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')||xml.includes('<sitemapindex')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap-main check:6","humanCommand":"Validate sitemap-main.xml partitions and update cadence; review the machine-readability evidence dimension for Sitemap Main Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-main-07","testId":"ni-sitemap-main-07","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Agent Discovery","description":"Validates agent discovery hints and AI-readable policy/documentation signals for sitemap-main.xml availability, indexing hints, and URL integrity. Evidence should include llms, policy, MCP, OpenAPI, or schema evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Agent Discovery appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the agent discovery evidence for sitemap main coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-main-07","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap-main.xml","seo","indexing","discovery","agent-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap-main.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')||xml.includes('<sitemapindex')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap-main check:7","humanCommand":"Validate sitemap-main.xml partitions and update cadence; review the agent-discovery evidence dimension for Sitemap Main Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-main-08","testId":"ni-sitemap-main-08","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Crawler Discovery","description":"Validates crawler discovery paths through robots, sitemap, feeds, and canonical links for sitemap-main.xml availability, indexing hints, and URL integrity. Evidence should include discovery artifact and link evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Crawler Discovery appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the crawler discovery evidence for sitemap main coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-main-08","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap-main.xml","seo","indexing","discovery","crawler-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap-main.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')||xml.includes('<sitemapindex')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap-main check:8","humanCommand":"Validate sitemap-main.xml partitions and update cadence; review the crawler-discovery evidence dimension for Sitemap Main Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-main-09","testId":"ni-sitemap-main-09","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Answerability","description":"Validates direct answer extraction and quotable explanatory content for sitemap-main.xml availability, indexing hints, and URL integrity. Evidence should include question, summary, heading, and paragraph evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Answerability appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the answerability evidence for sitemap main coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-main-09","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap-main.xml","seo","indexing","discovery","answerability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap-main.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')||xml.includes('<sitemapindex')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap-main check:9","humanCommand":"Validate sitemap-main.xml partitions and update cadence; review the answerability evidence dimension for Sitemap Main Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-main-10","testId":"ni-sitemap-main-10","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Generative Context","description":"Validates GEO context quality for generative engines without inventing measured facts for sitemap-main.xml availability, indexing hints, and URL integrity. Evidence should include entity, source, and instruction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Generative Context appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the generative context evidence for sitemap main coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-main-10","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap-main.xml","seo","indexing","discovery","generative-context","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap-main.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')||xml.includes('<sitemapindex')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap-main check:10","humanCommand":"Validate sitemap-main.xml partitions and update cadence; review the generative-context evidence dimension for Sitemap Main Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-main-11","testId":"ni-sitemap-main-11","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Search Intent","description":"Validates search intent alignment and snippet-friendly content structure for sitemap-main.xml availability, indexing hints, and URL integrity. Evidence should include metadata, headings, and topical text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Search Intent appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the search intent evidence for sitemap main coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-main-11","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap-main.xml","seo","indexing","discovery","search-intent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap-main.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')||xml.includes('<sitemapindex')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap-main check:11","humanCommand":"Validate sitemap-main.xml partitions and update cadence; review the search-intent evidence dimension for Sitemap Main Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-main-12","testId":"ni-sitemap-main-12","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Accessibility Semantics","description":"Validates accessible names, relationships, landmarks, and keyboard-relevant structure for sitemap-main.xml availability, indexing hints, and URL integrity. Evidence should include ARIA, labels, landmarks, and control evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Accessibility Semantics appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the accessibility semantics evidence for sitemap main coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-main-12","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap-main.xml","seo","indexing","discovery","accessibility-semantics","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap-main.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')||xml.includes('<sitemapindex')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap-main check:12","humanCommand":"Validate sitemap-main.xml partitions and update cadence; review the accessibility-semantics evidence dimension for Sitemap Main Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-main-13","testId":"ni-sitemap-main-13","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Mobile Readiness","description":"Validates mobile viewport, responsive content, and touch-friendly layout signals for sitemap-main.xml availability, indexing hints, and URL integrity. Evidence should include viewport and responsive asset evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Mobile Readiness appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the mobile readiness evidence for sitemap main coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-main-13","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap-main.xml","seo","indexing","discovery","mobile-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap-main.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')||xml.includes('<sitemapindex')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap-main check:13","humanCommand":"Validate sitemap-main.xml partitions and update cadence; review the mobile-readiness evidence dimension for Sitemap Main Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-main-14","testId":"ni-sitemap-main-14","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Performance Budget","description":"Validates performance budget compliance using measured or bounded deterministic inputs for sitemap-main.xml availability, indexing hints, and URL integrity. Evidence should include timing, byte, and Lighthouse-derived evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Performance Budget appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the performance budget evidence for sitemap main coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-main-14","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap-main.xml","seo","indexing","discovery","performance-budget","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap-main.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')||xml.includes('<sitemapindex')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap-main check:14","humanCommand":"Validate sitemap-main.xml partitions and update cadence; review the performance-budget evidence dimension for Sitemap Main Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-main-15","testId":"ni-sitemap-main-15","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Resource Efficiency","description":"Validates resource size, script/style count, and optimization opportunity signals for sitemap-main.xml availability, indexing hints, and URL integrity. Evidence should include resource and markup evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Resource Efficiency appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the resource efficiency evidence for sitemap main coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-main-15","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap-main.xml","seo","indexing","discovery","resource-efficiency","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap-main.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')||xml.includes('<sitemapindex')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap-main check:15","humanCommand":"Validate sitemap-main.xml partitions and update cadence; review the resource-efficiency evidence dimension for Sitemap Main Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-main-16","testId":"ni-sitemap-main-16","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Cache Freshness","description":"Validates cache behavior, freshness hints, and stale-content risk for sitemap-main.xml availability, indexing hints, and URL integrity. Evidence should include HTTP cache and timestamp evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Cache Freshness appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the cache freshness evidence for sitemap main coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-main-16","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap-main.xml","seo","indexing","discovery","cache-freshness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap-main.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')||xml.includes('<sitemapindex')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap-main check:16","humanCommand":"Validate sitemap-main.xml partitions and update cadence; review the cache-freshness evidence dimension for Sitemap Main Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-main-17","testId":"ni-sitemap-main-17","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Route Reliability","description":"Validates route reliability, redirect safety, and dead-link risk for sitemap-main.xml availability, indexing hints, and URL integrity. Evidence should include status, redirect, and sitemap evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Route Reliability appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the route reliability evidence for sitemap main coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-main-17","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap-main.xml","seo","indexing","discovery","route-reliability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap-main.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')||xml.includes('<sitemapindex')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap-main check:17","humanCommand":"Validate sitemap-main.xml partitions and update cadence; review the route-reliability evidence dimension for Sitemap Main Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-main-18","testId":"ni-sitemap-main-18","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Feed Quality","description":"Validates RSS/Atom/feed usefulness, parseability, and freshness for sitemap-main.xml availability, indexing hints, and URL integrity. Evidence should include feed XML and item evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Feed Quality appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the feed quality evidence for sitemap main coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-main-18","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap-main.xml","seo","indexing","discovery","feed-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap-main.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')||xml.includes('<sitemapindex')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap-main check:18","humanCommand":"Validate sitemap-main.xml partitions and update cadence; review the feed-quality evidence dimension for Sitemap Main Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-main-19","testId":"ni-sitemap-main-19","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Sitemap Quality","description":"Validates sitemap validity, public-safe URL coverage, and no-dead-link policy for sitemap-main.xml availability, indexing hints, and URL integrity. Evidence should include sitemap XML and bounded link-check evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Sitemap Quality appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the sitemap quality evidence for sitemap main coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-main-19","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap-main.xml","seo","indexing","discovery","sitemap-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap-main.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')||xml.includes('<sitemapindex')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap-main check:19","humanCommand":"Validate sitemap-main.xml partitions and update cadence; review the sitemap-quality evidence dimension for Sitemap Main Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-main-20","testId":"ni-sitemap-main-20","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Robots Alignment","description":"Validates robots.txt alignment with public/protected policy and sitemap discovery for sitemap-main.xml availability, indexing hints, and URL integrity. Evidence should include robots directives and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Robots Alignment appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the robots alignment evidence for sitemap main coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-main-20","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap-main.xml","seo","indexing","discovery","robots-alignment","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap-main.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')||xml.includes('<sitemapindex')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap-main check:20","humanCommand":"Validate sitemap-main.xml partitions and update cadence; review the robots-alignment evidence dimension for Sitemap Main Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-main-21","testId":"ni-sitemap-main-21","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Llms Structure","description":"Validates llms.txt structure, readability, endpoint coverage, and agent usefulness for sitemap-main.xml availability, indexing hints, and URL integrity. Evidence should include plain-text section and line-length evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Llms Structure appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms structure evidence for sitemap main coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-main-21","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap-main.xml","seo","indexing","discovery","llms-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap-main.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')||xml.includes('<sitemapindex')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap-main check:21","humanCommand":"Validate sitemap-main.xml partitions and update cadence; review the llms-structure evidence dimension for Sitemap Main Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-main-22","testId":"ni-sitemap-main-22","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Llms Index Schema","description":"Validates llms-index JSON schema shape and count reconciliation for sitemap-main.xml availability, indexing hints, and URL integrity. Evidence should include JSON keys, counts, and endpoint evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Llms Index Schema appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms index schema evidence for sitemap main coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-main-22","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap-main.xml","seo","indexing","discovery","llms-index-schema","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap-main.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')||xml.includes('<sitemapindex')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap-main check:22","humanCommand":"Validate sitemap-main.xml partitions and update cadence; review the llms-index-schema evidence dimension for Sitemap Main Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-main-23","testId":"ni-sitemap-main-23","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Humans Attribution","description":"Validates humans.txt attribution, maintainer, technology, and governance transparency for sitemap-main.xml availability, indexing hints, and URL integrity. Evidence should include humans.txt section evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Humans Attribution appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the humans attribution evidence for sitemap main coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-main-23","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap-main.xml","seo","indexing","discovery","humans-attribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap-main.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')||xml.includes('<sitemapindex')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap-main check:23","humanCommand":"Validate sitemap-main.xml partitions and update cadence; review the humans-attribution evidence dimension for Sitemap Main Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-main-24","testId":"ni-sitemap-main-24","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Agent Policy","description":"Validates agent-policy JSON clarity for allowed, disallowed, and protected operations for sitemap-main.xml availability, indexing hints, and URL integrity. Evidence should include well-known policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Agent Policy appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the agent policy evidence for sitemap main coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-main-24","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap-main.xml","seo","indexing","discovery","agent-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap-main.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')||xml.includes('<sitemapindex')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap-main check:24","humanCommand":"Validate sitemap-main.xml partitions and update cadence; review the agent-policy evidence dimension for Sitemap Main Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-main-25","testId":"ni-sitemap-main-25","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Ai Policy","description":"Validates AI policy clarity for training, search, answer use, caching, and attribution for sitemap-main.xml availability, indexing hints, and URL integrity. Evidence should include well-known AI policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Ai Policy appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ai policy evidence for sitemap main coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-main-25","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap-main.xml","seo","indexing","discovery","ai-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap-main.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')||xml.includes('<sitemapindex')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap-main check:25","humanCommand":"Validate sitemap-main.xml partitions and update cadence; review the ai-policy evidence dimension for Sitemap Main Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-main-26","testId":"ni-sitemap-main-26","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Trust Policy","description":"Validates trust policy coverage for privacy, traceability, metadata, and protected actions for sitemap-main.xml availability, indexing hints, and URL integrity. Evidence should include trust.json evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Trust Policy appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the trust policy evidence for sitemap main coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-main-26","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap-main.xml","seo","indexing","discovery","trust-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap-main.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')||xml.includes('<sitemapindex')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap-main check:26","humanCommand":"Validate sitemap-main.xml partitions and update cadence; review the trust-policy evidence dimension for Sitemap Main Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-main-27","testId":"ni-sitemap-main-27","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Openapi Contract","description":"Validates OpenAPI availability, server URL accuracy, schemas, and auth policy for sitemap-main.xml availability, indexing hints, and URL integrity. Evidence should include OpenAPI text/JSON evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Openapi Contract appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the openapi contract evidence for sitemap main coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-main-27","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap-main.xml","seo","indexing","discovery","openapi-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap-main.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')||xml.includes('<sitemapindex')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap-main check:27","humanCommand":"Validate sitemap-main.xml partitions and update cadence; review the openapi-contract evidence dimension for Sitemap Main Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-main-28","testId":"ni-sitemap-main-28","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Mcp Contract","description":"Validates MCP JSON-RPC introspection, real tools, resources, and protected boundaries for sitemap-main.xml availability, indexing hints, and URL integrity. Evidence should include MCP manifest and initialize evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Mcp Contract appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the mcp contract evidence for sitemap main coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-main-28","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap-main.xml","seo","indexing","discovery","mcp-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap-main.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')||xml.includes('<sitemapindex')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap-main check:28","humanCommand":"Validate sitemap-main.xml partitions and update cadence; review the mcp-contract evidence dimension for Sitemap Main Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-main-29","testId":"ni-sitemap-main-29","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Api Error Shape","description":"Validates API success/error response shape consistency for sitemap-main.xml availability, indexing hints, and URL integrity. Evidence should include REST envelope evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Api Error Shape appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the api error shape evidence for sitemap main coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-main-29","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap-main.xml","seo","indexing","discovery","api-error-shape","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap-main.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')||xml.includes('<sitemapindex')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap-main check:29","humanCommand":"Validate sitemap-main.xml partitions and update cadence; review the api-error-shape evidence dimension for Sitemap Main Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-main-30","testId":"ni-sitemap-main-30","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Traceability","description":"Validates trace propagation, request IDs, and safe observability correlation for sitemap-main.xml availability, indexing hints, and URL integrity. Evidence should include trace header and metadata evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Traceability appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the traceability evidence for sitemap main coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-main-30","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap-main.xml","seo","indexing","discovery","traceability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap-main.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')||xml.includes('<sitemapindex')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap-main check:30","humanCommand":"Validate sitemap-main.xml partitions and update cadence; review the traceability evidence dimension for Sitemap Main Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-main-31","testId":"ni-sitemap-main-31","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Ja4 Redaction","description":"Validates fingerprint-adjacent metadata redaction and non-public raw JA4 handling for sitemap-main.xml availability, indexing hints, and URL integrity. Evidence should include metadata policy and redaction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Ja4 Redaction appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the ja4 redaction evidence for sitemap main coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-main-31","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap-main.xml","seo","indexing","discovery","ja4-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap-main.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')||xml.includes('<sitemapindex')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap-main check:31","humanCommand":"Validate sitemap-main.xml partitions and update cadence; review the ja4-redaction evidence dimension for Sitemap Main Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-main-32","testId":"ni-sitemap-main-32","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Secret Redaction","description":"Validates absence of secrets, generic key examples, cookies, and raw tokens in public outputs for sitemap-main.xml availability, indexing hints, and URL integrity. Evidence should include public artifact scan evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Secret Redaction appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the secret redaction evidence for sitemap main coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-main-32","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap-main.xml","seo","indexing","discovery","secret-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap-main.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')||xml.includes('<sitemapindex')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap-main check:32","humanCommand":"Validate sitemap-main.xml partitions and update cadence; review the secret-redaction evidence dimension for Sitemap Main Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-main-33","testId":"ni-sitemap-main-33","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Security Headers","description":"Validates security header coverage and hardened transport signals for sitemap-main.xml availability, indexing hints, and URL integrity. Evidence should include HTTP header evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Security Headers appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the security headers evidence for sitemap main coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-main-33","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap-main.xml","seo","indexing","discovery","security-headers","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap-main.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')||xml.includes('<sitemapindex')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap-main check:33","humanCommand":"Validate sitemap-main.xml partitions and update cadence; review the security-headers evidence dimension for Sitemap Main Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-main-34","testId":"ni-sitemap-main-34","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Privacy Consent","description":"Validates privacy policy, consent, attribution, and data-use disclosure quality for sitemap-main.xml availability, indexing hints, and URL integrity. Evidence should include public page and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Privacy Consent appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the privacy consent evidence for sitemap main coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-main-34","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap-main.xml","seo","indexing","discovery","privacy-consent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap-main.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')||xml.includes('<sitemapindex')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap-main check:34","humanCommand":"Validate sitemap-main.xml partitions and update cadence; review the privacy-consent evidence dimension for Sitemap Main Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-main-35","testId":"ni-sitemap-main-35","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Structured Data","description":"Validates JSON-LD and entity modeling for machine interpretation for sitemap-main.xml availability, indexing hints, and URL integrity. Evidence should include schema block and parse evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Structured Data appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the structured data evidence for sitemap main coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-main-35","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap-main.xml","seo","indexing","discovery","structured-data","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap-main.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')||xml.includes('<sitemapindex')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap-main check:35","humanCommand":"Validate sitemap-main.xml partitions and update cadence; review the structured-data evidence dimension for Sitemap Main Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-main-36","testId":"ni-sitemap-main-36","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Social Preview","description":"Validates Open Graph and Twitter/X card readiness for public sharing for sitemap-main.xml availability, indexing hints, and URL integrity. Evidence should include meta tag evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Social Preview appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the social preview evidence for sitemap main coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-main-36","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap-main.xml","seo","indexing","discovery","social-preview","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap-main.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')||xml.includes('<sitemapindex')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap-main check:36","humanCommand":"Validate sitemap-main.xml partitions and update cadence; review the social-preview evidence dimension for Sitemap Main Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-main-37","testId":"ni-sitemap-main-37","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap Main Coverage: I18n Routing","description":"Validates locale route, hreflang, language declaration, and translation readiness for sitemap-main.xml availability, indexing hints, and URL integrity. Evidence should include lang/hreflang and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap Main Coverage: I18n Routing appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the i18n routing evidence for sitemap main coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-main-37","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap-main.xml","seo","indexing","discovery","i18n-routing","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap-main.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')||xml.includes('<sitemapindex')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap-main check:37","humanCommand":"Validate sitemap-main.xml partitions and update cadence; review the i18n-routing evidence dimension for Sitemap Main Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-main-38","testId":"ni-sitemap-main-38","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Readability","description":"Validates human readability, sectioning, sentence complexity, and comprehension support for sitemap-main.xml availability, indexing hints, and URL integrity. Evidence should include extracted content evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Readability appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the readability evidence for sitemap main coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-main-38","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap-main.xml","seo","indexing","discovery","readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap-main.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')||xml.includes('<sitemapindex')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap-main check:38","humanCommand":"Validate sitemap-main.xml partitions and update cadence; review the readability evidence dimension for Sitemap Main Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-main-39","testId":"ni-sitemap-main-39","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Content Utility","description":"Validates non-placeholder content usefulness and domain-specific public value for sitemap-main.xml availability, indexing hints, and URL integrity. Evidence should include content extraction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Content Utility appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the content utility evidence for sitemap main coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-main-39","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap-main.xml","seo","indexing","discovery","content-utility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap-main.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')||xml.includes('<sitemapindex')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap-main check:39","humanCommand":"Validate sitemap-main.xml partitions and update cadence; review the content-utility evidence dimension for Sitemap Main Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-main-40","testId":"ni-sitemap-main-40","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Recommendation Grounding","description":"Validates recommendation grounding in deterministic evidence instead of fabricated model output for sitemap-main.xml availability, indexing hints, and URL integrity. Evidence should include issue and remediation evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Recommendation Grounding appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the recommendation grounding evidence for sitemap main coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-main-40","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap-main.xml","seo","indexing","discovery","recommendation-grounding","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap-main.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')||xml.includes('<sitemapindex')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap-main check:40","humanCommand":"Validate sitemap-main.xml partitions and update cadence; review the recommendation-grounding evidence dimension for Sitemap Main Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-main-41","testId":"ni-sitemap-main-41","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Evidence Quality","description":"Validates evidence completeness, public safety, and reproducibility for sitemap-main.xml availability, indexing hints, and URL integrity. Evidence should include test output and artifact evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Evidence Quality appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the evidence quality evidence for sitemap main coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-main-41","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap-main.xml","seo","indexing","discovery","evidence-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap-main.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')||xml.includes('<sitemapindex')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap-main check:41","humanCommand":"Validate sitemap-main.xml partitions and update cadence; review the evidence-quality evidence dimension for Sitemap Main Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-main-42","testId":"ni-sitemap-main-42","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Threshold Policy","description":"Validates threshold clarity, pass/warn/fail semantics, and scoring transparency for sitemap-main.xml availability, indexing hints, and URL integrity. Evidence should include threshold and result status evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Threshold Policy appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the threshold policy evidence for sitemap main coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-main-42","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap-main.xml","seo","indexing","discovery","threshold-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap-main.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')||xml.includes('<sitemapindex')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap-main check:42","humanCommand":"Validate sitemap-main.xml partitions and update cadence; review the threshold-policy evidence dimension for Sitemap Main Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-main-43","testId":"ni-sitemap-main-43","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Confidence","description":"Validates confidence scoring and degraded-input disclosure for sitemap-main.xml availability, indexing hints, and URL integrity. Evidence should include source freshness and input availability evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Confidence appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the confidence evidence for sitemap main coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-main-43","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap-main.xml","seo","indexing","discovery","confidence","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap-main.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')||xml.includes('<sitemapindex')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap-main check:43","humanCommand":"Validate sitemap-main.xml partitions and update cadence; review the confidence evidence dimension for Sitemap Main Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-main-44","testId":"ni-sitemap-main-44","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Trend Readiness","description":"Validates historical comparability and timeline readiness for future reruns for sitemap-main.xml availability, indexing hints, and URL integrity. Evidence should include analysis ID, timestamp, and persistence evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Trend Readiness appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the trend readiness evidence for sitemap main coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-main-44","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap-main.xml","seo","indexing","discovery","trend-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap-main.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')||xml.includes('<sitemapindex')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap-main check:44","humanCommand":"Validate sitemap-main.xml partitions and update cadence; review the trend-readiness evidence dimension for Sitemap Main Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-main-45","testId":"ni-sitemap-main-45","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Ranking Readiness","description":"Validates ranking input completeness and profile compatibility for sitemap-main.xml availability, indexing hints, and URL integrity. Evidence should include score and profile evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Ranking Readiness appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ranking readiness evidence for sitemap main coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-main-45","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap-main.xml","seo","indexing","discovery","ranking-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap-main.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')||xml.includes('<sitemapindex')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap-main check:45","humanCommand":"Validate sitemap-main.xml partitions and update cadence; review the ranking-readiness evidence dimension for Sitemap Main Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-main-46","testId":"ni-sitemap-main-46","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Network Contribution","description":"Validates PlatPhorm network contribution through discovery, integrations, and standards compliance for sitemap-main.xml availability, indexing hints, and URL integrity. Evidence should include network graph and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Network Contribution appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the network contribution evidence for sitemap main coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-main-46","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap-main.xml","seo","indexing","discovery","network-contribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap-main.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')||xml.includes('<sitemapindex')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap-main check:46","humanCommand":"Validate sitemap-main.xml partitions and update cadence; review the network-contribution evidence dimension for Sitemap Main Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-main-47","testId":"ni-sitemap-main-47","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Report Readiness","description":"Validates report/export categorization with public-safe evidence and protected boundaries for sitemap-main.xml availability, indexing hints, and URL integrity. Evidence should include report section mapping evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Report Readiness appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the report readiness evidence for sitemap main coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-main-47","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap-main.xml","seo","indexing","discovery","report-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap-main.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')||xml.includes('<sitemapindex')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap-main check:47","humanCommand":"Validate sitemap-main.xml partitions and update cadence; review the report-readiness evidence dimension for Sitemap Main Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-main-48","testId":"ni-sitemap-main-48","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Operator Actionability","description":"Validates clear remediation, owner action, difficulty, and retest path for sitemap-main.xml availability, indexing hints, and URL integrity. Evidence should include fix instructions and command evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Operator Actionability appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the operator actionability evidence for sitemap main coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-main-48","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap-main.xml","seo","indexing","discovery","operator-actionability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap-main.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')||xml.includes('<sitemapindex')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap-main check:48","humanCommand":"Validate sitemap-main.xml partitions and update cadence; review the operator-actionability evidence dimension for Sitemap Main Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-main-49","testId":"ni-sitemap-main-49","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Degraded State","description":"Validates honest degraded, unavailable, skipped, and not-applicable states for sitemap-main.xml availability, indexing hints, and URL integrity. Evidence should include status and storage evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Degraded State appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the degraded state evidence for sitemap main coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-main-49","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap-main.xml","seo","indexing","discovery","degraded-state","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap-main.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')||xml.includes('<sitemapindex')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap-main check:49","humanCommand":"Validate sitemap-main.xml partitions and update cadence; review the degraded-state evidence dimension for Sitemap Main Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitemap-main-50","testId":"ni-sitemap-main-50","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Reproducibility","description":"Validates stable CLI/API/human reproduction path and deterministic rerun instructions for sitemap-main.xml availability, indexing hints, and URL integrity. Evidence should include commands and registry version evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitemap Main Coverage: Reproducibility appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the reproducibility evidence for sitemap main coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitemap-main-50","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitemap-main.xml","seo","indexing","discovery","reproducibility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap-main.xml').then(r=>r.text()).then(xml=>console.log(xml.includes('<urlset')||xml.includes('<sitemapindex')?'ok':'invalid'))\" # group:sitemap-main check:50","humanCommand":"Validate sitemap-main.xml partitions and update cadence; review the reproducibility evidence dimension for Sitemap Main Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-mcp-tools-01","testId":"ni-mcp-tools-01","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"MCP Tool Availability: Availability","description":"Validates public route availability and successful bounded fetch behavior for mcp tool discoverability, response quality, and contract completeness. Evidence should include HTTP status, timeout, and redirect evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"MCP Tool Availability: Availability appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the availability evidence for mcp tool availability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-mcp-tools-01","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["mcp","tools","availability","agent","availability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:mcp-tools check:1","humanCommand":"Check MCP tool list includes stable names, schemas, and availability; review the availability evidence dimension for MCP Tool Availability"}},{"id":"ni-mcp-tools-02","testId":"ni-mcp-tools-02","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"MCP Tool Availability: Public Safety","description":"Validates public-safe access boundaries without exposing private or protected data for mcp tool discoverability, response quality, and contract completeness. Evidence should include route policy and response-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"MCP Tool Availability: Public Safety appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the public safety evidence for mcp tool availability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-mcp-tools-02","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["mcp","tools","availability","agent","public-safety","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:mcp-tools check:2","humanCommand":"Check MCP tool list includes stable names, schemas, and availability; review the public-safety evidence dimension for MCP Tool Availability"}},{"id":"ni-mcp-tools-03","testId":"ni-mcp-tools-03","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"MCP Tool Availability: Canonical Url","description":"Validates canonical URL stability and normalized route identity for mcp tool discoverability, response quality, and contract completeness. Evidence should include canonical tags, redirects, and normalized URL evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"MCP Tool Availability: Canonical Url appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the canonical url evidence for mcp tool availability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-mcp-tools-03","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["mcp","tools","availability","agent","canonical-url","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:mcp-tools check:3","humanCommand":"Check MCP tool list includes stable names, schemas, and availability; review the canonical-url evidence dimension for MCP Tool Availability"}},{"id":"ni-mcp-tools-04","testId":"ni-mcp-tools-04","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"MCP Tool Availability: Metadata Clarity","description":"Validates title, description, and page-specific metadata clarity for mcp tool discoverability, response quality, and contract completeness. Evidence should include HTML metadata and extracted text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"MCP Tool Availability: Metadata Clarity appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the metadata clarity evidence for mcp tool availability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-mcp-tools-04","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["mcp","tools","availability","agent","metadata-clarity","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:mcp-tools check:4","humanCommand":"Check MCP tool list includes stable names, schemas, and availability; review the metadata-clarity evidence dimension for MCP Tool Availability"}},{"id":"ni-mcp-tools-05","testId":"ni-mcp-tools-05","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"MCP Tool Availability: Semantic Structure","description":"Validates semantic HTML structure for humans, agents, and assistive technology for mcp tool discoverability, response quality, and contract completeness. Evidence should include heading, landmark, and element evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"MCP Tool Availability: Semantic Structure appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the semantic structure evidence for mcp tool availability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-mcp-tools-05","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["mcp","tools","availability","agent","semantic-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:mcp-tools check:5","humanCommand":"Check MCP tool list includes stable names, schemas, and availability; review the semantic-structure evidence dimension for MCP Tool Availability"}},{"id":"ni-mcp-tools-06","testId":"ni-mcp-tools-06","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"MCP Tool Availability: Machine Readability","description":"Validates machine-readable public content and predictable parsing surfaces for mcp tool discoverability, response quality, and contract completeness. Evidence should include structured tags, JSON-LD, and document-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"MCP Tool Availability: Machine Readability appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the machine readability evidence for mcp tool availability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-mcp-tools-06","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["mcp","tools","availability","agent","machine-readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:mcp-tools check:6","humanCommand":"Check MCP tool list includes stable names, schemas, and availability; review the machine-readability evidence dimension for MCP Tool Availability"}},{"id":"ni-mcp-tools-07","testId":"ni-mcp-tools-07","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"MCP Tool Availability: Agent Discovery","description":"Validates agent discovery hints and AI-readable policy/documentation signals for mcp tool discoverability, response quality, and contract completeness. Evidence should include llms, policy, MCP, OpenAPI, or schema evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"MCP Tool Availability: Agent Discovery appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the agent discovery evidence for mcp tool availability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-mcp-tools-07","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["mcp","tools","availability","agent","agent-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:mcp-tools check:7","humanCommand":"Check MCP tool list includes stable names, schemas, and availability; review the agent-discovery evidence dimension for MCP Tool Availability"}},{"id":"ni-mcp-tools-08","testId":"ni-mcp-tools-08","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"MCP Tool Availability: Crawler Discovery","description":"Validates crawler discovery paths through robots, sitemap, feeds, and canonical links for mcp tool discoverability, response quality, and contract completeness. Evidence should include discovery artifact and link evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"MCP Tool Availability: Crawler Discovery appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the crawler discovery evidence for mcp tool availability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-mcp-tools-08","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["mcp","tools","availability","agent","crawler-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:mcp-tools check:8","humanCommand":"Check MCP tool list includes stable names, schemas, and availability; review the crawler-discovery evidence dimension for MCP Tool Availability"}},{"id":"ni-mcp-tools-09","testId":"ni-mcp-tools-09","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"MCP Tool Availability: Answerability","description":"Validates direct answer extraction and quotable explanatory content for mcp tool discoverability, response quality, and contract completeness. Evidence should include question, summary, heading, and paragraph evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"MCP Tool Availability: Answerability appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the answerability evidence for mcp tool availability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-mcp-tools-09","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["mcp","tools","availability","agent","answerability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:mcp-tools check:9","humanCommand":"Check MCP tool list includes stable names, schemas, and availability; review the answerability evidence dimension for MCP Tool Availability"}},{"id":"ni-mcp-tools-10","testId":"ni-mcp-tools-10","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"MCP Tool Availability: Generative Context","description":"Validates GEO context quality for generative engines without inventing measured facts for mcp tool discoverability, response quality, and contract completeness. Evidence should include entity, source, and instruction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"MCP Tool Availability: Generative Context appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the generative context evidence for mcp tool availability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-mcp-tools-10","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["mcp","tools","availability","agent","generative-context","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:mcp-tools check:10","humanCommand":"Check MCP tool list includes stable names, schemas, and availability; review the generative-context evidence dimension for MCP Tool Availability"}},{"id":"ni-mcp-tools-11","testId":"ni-mcp-tools-11","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"MCP Tool Availability: Search Intent","description":"Validates search intent alignment and snippet-friendly content structure for mcp tool discoverability, response quality, and contract completeness. Evidence should include metadata, headings, and topical text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"MCP Tool Availability: Search Intent appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the search intent evidence for mcp tool availability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-mcp-tools-11","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["mcp","tools","availability","agent","search-intent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:mcp-tools check:11","humanCommand":"Check MCP tool list includes stable names, schemas, and availability; review the search-intent evidence dimension for MCP Tool Availability"}},{"id":"ni-mcp-tools-12","testId":"ni-mcp-tools-12","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"MCP Tool Availability: Accessibility Semantics","description":"Validates accessible names, relationships, landmarks, and keyboard-relevant structure for mcp tool discoverability, response quality, and contract completeness. Evidence should include ARIA, labels, landmarks, and control evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"MCP Tool Availability: Accessibility Semantics appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the accessibility semantics evidence for mcp tool availability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-mcp-tools-12","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["mcp","tools","availability","agent","accessibility-semantics","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:mcp-tools check:12","humanCommand":"Check MCP tool list includes stable names, schemas, and availability; review the accessibility-semantics evidence dimension for MCP Tool Availability"}},{"id":"ni-mcp-tools-13","testId":"ni-mcp-tools-13","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"MCP Tool Availability: Mobile Readiness","description":"Validates mobile viewport, responsive content, and touch-friendly layout signals for mcp tool discoverability, response quality, and contract completeness. Evidence should include viewport and responsive asset evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"MCP Tool Availability: Mobile Readiness appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the mobile readiness evidence for mcp tool availability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-mcp-tools-13","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["mcp","tools","availability","agent","mobile-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:mcp-tools check:13","humanCommand":"Check MCP tool list includes stable names, schemas, and availability; review the mobile-readiness evidence dimension for MCP Tool Availability"}},{"id":"ni-mcp-tools-14","testId":"ni-mcp-tools-14","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"MCP Tool Availability: Performance Budget","description":"Validates performance budget compliance using measured or bounded deterministic inputs for mcp tool discoverability, response quality, and contract completeness. Evidence should include timing, byte, and Lighthouse-derived evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"MCP Tool Availability: Performance Budget appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the performance budget evidence for mcp tool availability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-mcp-tools-14","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["mcp","tools","availability","agent","performance-budget","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:mcp-tools check:14","humanCommand":"Check MCP tool list includes stable names, schemas, and availability; review the performance-budget evidence dimension for MCP Tool Availability"}},{"id":"ni-mcp-tools-15","testId":"ni-mcp-tools-15","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"MCP Tool Availability: Resource Efficiency","description":"Validates resource size, script/style count, and optimization opportunity signals for mcp tool discoverability, response quality, and contract completeness. Evidence should include resource and markup evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"MCP Tool Availability: Resource Efficiency appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the resource efficiency evidence for mcp tool availability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-mcp-tools-15","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["mcp","tools","availability","agent","resource-efficiency","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:mcp-tools check:15","humanCommand":"Check MCP tool list includes stable names, schemas, and availability; review the resource-efficiency evidence dimension for MCP Tool Availability"}},{"id":"ni-mcp-tools-16","testId":"ni-mcp-tools-16","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"MCP Tool Availability: Cache Freshness","description":"Validates cache behavior, freshness hints, and stale-content risk for mcp tool discoverability, response quality, and contract completeness. Evidence should include HTTP cache and timestamp evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"MCP Tool Availability: Cache Freshness appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the cache freshness evidence for mcp tool availability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-mcp-tools-16","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["mcp","tools","availability","agent","cache-freshness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:mcp-tools check:16","humanCommand":"Check MCP tool list includes stable names, schemas, and availability; review the cache-freshness evidence dimension for MCP Tool Availability"}},{"id":"ni-mcp-tools-17","testId":"ni-mcp-tools-17","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"MCP Tool Availability: Route Reliability","description":"Validates route reliability, redirect safety, and dead-link risk for mcp tool discoverability, response quality, and contract completeness. Evidence should include status, redirect, and sitemap evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"MCP Tool Availability: Route Reliability appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the route reliability evidence for mcp tool availability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-mcp-tools-17","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["mcp","tools","availability","agent","route-reliability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:mcp-tools check:17","humanCommand":"Check MCP tool list includes stable names, schemas, and availability; review the route-reliability evidence dimension for MCP Tool Availability"}},{"id":"ni-mcp-tools-18","testId":"ni-mcp-tools-18","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"MCP Tool Availability: Feed Quality","description":"Validates RSS/Atom/feed usefulness, parseability, and freshness for mcp tool discoverability, response quality, and contract completeness. Evidence should include feed XML and item evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"MCP Tool Availability: Feed Quality appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the feed quality evidence for mcp tool availability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-mcp-tools-18","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["mcp","tools","availability","agent","feed-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:mcp-tools check:18","humanCommand":"Check MCP tool list includes stable names, schemas, and availability; review the feed-quality evidence dimension for MCP Tool Availability"}},{"id":"ni-mcp-tools-19","testId":"ni-mcp-tools-19","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"MCP Tool Availability: Sitemap Quality","description":"Validates sitemap validity, public-safe URL coverage, and no-dead-link policy for mcp tool discoverability, response quality, and contract completeness. Evidence should include sitemap XML and bounded link-check evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"MCP Tool Availability: Sitemap Quality appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the sitemap quality evidence for mcp tool availability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-mcp-tools-19","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["mcp","tools","availability","agent","sitemap-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:mcp-tools check:19","humanCommand":"Check MCP tool list includes stable names, schemas, and availability; review the sitemap-quality evidence dimension for MCP Tool Availability"}},{"id":"ni-mcp-tools-20","testId":"ni-mcp-tools-20","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"MCP Tool Availability: Robots Alignment","description":"Validates robots.txt alignment with public/protected policy and sitemap discovery for mcp tool discoverability, response quality, and contract completeness. Evidence should include robots directives and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"MCP Tool Availability: Robots Alignment appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the robots alignment evidence for mcp tool availability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-mcp-tools-20","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["mcp","tools","availability","agent","robots-alignment","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:mcp-tools check:20","humanCommand":"Check MCP tool list includes stable names, schemas, and availability; review the robots-alignment evidence dimension for MCP Tool Availability"}},{"id":"ni-mcp-tools-21","testId":"ni-mcp-tools-21","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"MCP Tool Availability: Llms Structure","description":"Validates llms.txt structure, readability, endpoint coverage, and agent usefulness for mcp tool discoverability, response quality, and contract completeness. Evidence should include plain-text section and line-length evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"MCP Tool Availability: Llms Structure appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms structure evidence for mcp tool availability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-mcp-tools-21","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["mcp","tools","availability","agent","llms-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:mcp-tools check:21","humanCommand":"Check MCP tool list includes stable names, schemas, and availability; review the llms-structure evidence dimension for MCP Tool Availability"}},{"id":"ni-mcp-tools-22","testId":"ni-mcp-tools-22","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"MCP Tool Availability: Llms Index Schema","description":"Validates llms-index JSON schema shape and count reconciliation for mcp tool discoverability, response quality, and contract completeness. Evidence should include JSON keys, counts, and endpoint evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"MCP Tool Availability: Llms Index Schema appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms index schema evidence for mcp tool availability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-mcp-tools-22","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["mcp","tools","availability","agent","llms-index-schema","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:mcp-tools check:22","humanCommand":"Check MCP tool list includes stable names, schemas, and availability; review the llms-index-schema evidence dimension for MCP Tool Availability"}},{"id":"ni-mcp-tools-23","testId":"ni-mcp-tools-23","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"MCP Tool Availability: Humans Attribution","description":"Validates humans.txt attribution, maintainer, technology, and governance transparency for mcp tool discoverability, response quality, and contract completeness. Evidence should include humans.txt section evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"MCP Tool Availability: Humans Attribution appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the humans attribution evidence for mcp tool availability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-mcp-tools-23","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["mcp","tools","availability","agent","humans-attribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:mcp-tools check:23","humanCommand":"Check MCP tool list includes stable names, schemas, and availability; review the humans-attribution evidence dimension for MCP Tool Availability"}},{"id":"ni-mcp-tools-24","testId":"ni-mcp-tools-24","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"MCP Tool Availability: Agent Policy","description":"Validates agent-policy JSON clarity for allowed, disallowed, and protected operations for mcp tool discoverability, response quality, and contract completeness. Evidence should include well-known policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"MCP Tool Availability: Agent Policy appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the agent policy evidence for mcp tool availability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-mcp-tools-24","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["mcp","tools","availability","agent","agent-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:mcp-tools check:24","humanCommand":"Check MCP tool list includes stable names, schemas, and availability; review the agent-policy evidence dimension for MCP Tool Availability"}},{"id":"ni-mcp-tools-25","testId":"ni-mcp-tools-25","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"MCP Tool Availability: Ai Policy","description":"Validates AI policy clarity for training, search, answer use, caching, and attribution for mcp tool discoverability, response quality, and contract completeness. Evidence should include well-known AI policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"MCP Tool Availability: Ai Policy appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ai policy evidence for mcp tool availability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-mcp-tools-25","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["mcp","tools","availability","agent","ai-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:mcp-tools check:25","humanCommand":"Check MCP tool list includes stable names, schemas, and availability; review the ai-policy evidence dimension for MCP Tool Availability"}},{"id":"ni-mcp-tools-26","testId":"ni-mcp-tools-26","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"MCP Tool Availability: Trust Policy","description":"Validates trust policy coverage for privacy, traceability, metadata, and protected actions for mcp tool discoverability, response quality, and contract completeness. Evidence should include trust.json evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"MCP Tool Availability: Trust Policy appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the trust policy evidence for mcp tool availability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-mcp-tools-26","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["mcp","tools","availability","agent","trust-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:mcp-tools check:26","humanCommand":"Check MCP tool list includes stable names, schemas, and availability; review the trust-policy evidence dimension for MCP Tool Availability"}},{"id":"ni-mcp-tools-27","testId":"ni-mcp-tools-27","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"MCP Tool Availability: Openapi Contract","description":"Validates OpenAPI availability, server URL accuracy, schemas, and auth policy for mcp tool discoverability, response quality, and contract completeness. Evidence should include OpenAPI text/JSON evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"MCP Tool Availability: Openapi Contract appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the openapi contract evidence for mcp tool availability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-mcp-tools-27","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["mcp","tools","availability","agent","openapi-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:mcp-tools check:27","humanCommand":"Check MCP tool list includes stable names, schemas, and availability; review the openapi-contract evidence dimension for MCP Tool Availability"}},{"id":"ni-mcp-tools-28","testId":"ni-mcp-tools-28","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"MCP Tool Availability: Mcp Contract","description":"Validates MCP JSON-RPC introspection, real tools, resources, and protected boundaries for mcp tool discoverability, response quality, and contract completeness. Evidence should include MCP manifest and initialize evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"MCP Tool Availability: Mcp Contract appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the mcp contract evidence for mcp tool availability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-mcp-tools-28","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["mcp","tools","availability","agent","mcp-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:mcp-tools check:28","humanCommand":"Check MCP tool list includes stable names, schemas, and availability; review the mcp-contract evidence dimension for MCP Tool Availability"}},{"id":"ni-mcp-tools-29","testId":"ni-mcp-tools-29","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"MCP Tool Availability: Api Error Shape","description":"Validates API success/error response shape consistency for mcp tool discoverability, response quality, and contract completeness. Evidence should include REST envelope evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"MCP Tool Availability: Api Error Shape appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the api error shape evidence for mcp tool availability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-mcp-tools-29","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["mcp","tools","availability","agent","api-error-shape","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:mcp-tools check:29","humanCommand":"Check MCP tool list includes stable names, schemas, and availability; review the api-error-shape evidence dimension for MCP Tool Availability"}},{"id":"ni-mcp-tools-30","testId":"ni-mcp-tools-30","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"MCP Tool Availability: Traceability","description":"Validates trace propagation, request IDs, and safe observability correlation for mcp tool discoverability, response quality, and contract completeness. Evidence should include trace header and metadata evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"MCP Tool Availability: Traceability appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the traceability evidence for mcp tool availability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-mcp-tools-30","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["mcp","tools","availability","agent","traceability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:mcp-tools check:30","humanCommand":"Check MCP tool list includes stable names, schemas, and availability; review the traceability evidence dimension for MCP Tool Availability"}},{"id":"ni-mcp-tools-31","testId":"ni-mcp-tools-31","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"MCP Tool Availability: Ja4 Redaction","description":"Validates fingerprint-adjacent metadata redaction and non-public raw JA4 handling for mcp tool discoverability, response quality, and contract completeness. Evidence should include metadata policy and redaction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"MCP Tool Availability: Ja4 Redaction appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the ja4 redaction evidence for mcp tool availability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-mcp-tools-31","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["mcp","tools","availability","agent","ja4-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:mcp-tools check:31","humanCommand":"Check MCP tool list includes stable names, schemas, and availability; review the ja4-redaction evidence dimension for MCP Tool Availability"}},{"id":"ni-mcp-tools-32","testId":"ni-mcp-tools-32","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"MCP Tool Availability: Secret Redaction","description":"Validates absence of secrets, generic key examples, cookies, and raw tokens in public outputs for mcp tool discoverability, response quality, and contract completeness. Evidence should include public artifact scan evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"MCP Tool Availability: Secret Redaction appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the secret redaction evidence for mcp tool availability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-mcp-tools-32","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["mcp","tools","availability","agent","secret-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:mcp-tools check:32","humanCommand":"Check MCP tool list includes stable names, schemas, and availability; review the secret-redaction evidence dimension for MCP Tool Availability"}},{"id":"ni-mcp-tools-33","testId":"ni-mcp-tools-33","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"MCP Tool Availability: Security Headers","description":"Validates security header coverage and hardened transport signals for mcp tool discoverability, response quality, and contract completeness. Evidence should include HTTP header evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"MCP Tool Availability: Security Headers appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the security headers evidence for mcp tool availability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-mcp-tools-33","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["mcp","tools","availability","agent","security-headers","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:mcp-tools check:33","humanCommand":"Check MCP tool list includes stable names, schemas, and availability; review the security-headers evidence dimension for MCP Tool Availability"}},{"id":"ni-mcp-tools-34","testId":"ni-mcp-tools-34","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"MCP Tool Availability: Privacy Consent","description":"Validates privacy policy, consent, attribution, and data-use disclosure quality for mcp tool discoverability, response quality, and contract completeness. Evidence should include public page and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"MCP Tool Availability: Privacy Consent appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the privacy consent evidence for mcp tool availability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-mcp-tools-34","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["mcp","tools","availability","agent","privacy-consent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:mcp-tools check:34","humanCommand":"Check MCP tool list includes stable names, schemas, and availability; review the privacy-consent evidence dimension for MCP Tool Availability"}},{"id":"ni-mcp-tools-35","testId":"ni-mcp-tools-35","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"MCP Tool Availability: Structured Data","description":"Validates JSON-LD and entity modeling for machine interpretation for mcp tool discoverability, response quality, and contract completeness. Evidence should include schema block and parse evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"MCP Tool Availability: Structured Data appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the structured data evidence for mcp tool availability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-mcp-tools-35","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["mcp","tools","availability","agent","structured-data","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:mcp-tools check:35","humanCommand":"Check MCP tool list includes stable names, schemas, and availability; review the structured-data evidence dimension for MCP Tool Availability"}},{"id":"ni-mcp-tools-36","testId":"ni-mcp-tools-36","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"MCP Tool Availability: Social Preview","description":"Validates Open Graph and Twitter/X card readiness for public sharing for mcp tool discoverability, response quality, and contract completeness. Evidence should include meta tag evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"MCP Tool Availability: Social Preview appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the social preview evidence for mcp tool availability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-mcp-tools-36","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["mcp","tools","availability","agent","social-preview","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:mcp-tools check:36","humanCommand":"Check MCP tool list includes stable names, schemas, and availability; review the social-preview evidence dimension for MCP Tool Availability"}},{"id":"ni-mcp-tools-37","testId":"ni-mcp-tools-37","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"MCP Tool Availability: I18n Routing","description":"Validates locale route, hreflang, language declaration, and translation readiness for mcp tool discoverability, response quality, and contract completeness. Evidence should include lang/hreflang and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"MCP Tool Availability: I18n Routing appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the i18n routing evidence for mcp tool availability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-mcp-tools-37","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["mcp","tools","availability","agent","i18n-routing","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:mcp-tools check:37","humanCommand":"Check MCP tool list includes stable names, schemas, and availability; review the i18n-routing evidence dimension for MCP Tool Availability"}},{"id":"ni-mcp-tools-38","testId":"ni-mcp-tools-38","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"MCP Tool Availability: Readability","description":"Validates human readability, sectioning, sentence complexity, and comprehension support for mcp tool discoverability, response quality, and contract completeness. Evidence should include extracted content evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"MCP Tool Availability: Readability appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the readability evidence for mcp tool availability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-mcp-tools-38","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["mcp","tools","availability","agent","readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:mcp-tools check:38","humanCommand":"Check MCP tool list includes stable names, schemas, and availability; review the readability evidence dimension for MCP Tool Availability"}},{"id":"ni-mcp-tools-39","testId":"ni-mcp-tools-39","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"MCP Tool Availability: Content Utility","description":"Validates non-placeholder content usefulness and domain-specific public value for mcp tool discoverability, response quality, and contract completeness. Evidence should include content extraction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"MCP Tool Availability: Content Utility appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the content utility evidence for mcp tool availability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-mcp-tools-39","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["mcp","tools","availability","agent","content-utility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:mcp-tools check:39","humanCommand":"Check MCP tool list includes stable names, schemas, and availability; review the content-utility evidence dimension for MCP Tool Availability"}},{"id":"ni-mcp-tools-40","testId":"ni-mcp-tools-40","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"MCP Tool Availability: Recommendation Grounding","description":"Validates recommendation grounding in deterministic evidence instead of fabricated model output for mcp tool discoverability, response quality, and contract completeness. Evidence should include issue and remediation evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"MCP Tool Availability: Recommendation Grounding appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the recommendation grounding evidence for mcp tool availability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-mcp-tools-40","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["mcp","tools","availability","agent","recommendation-grounding","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:mcp-tools check:40","humanCommand":"Check MCP tool list includes stable names, schemas, and availability; review the recommendation-grounding evidence dimension for MCP Tool Availability"}},{"id":"ni-mcp-tools-41","testId":"ni-mcp-tools-41","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"MCP Tool Availability: Evidence Quality","description":"Validates evidence completeness, public safety, and reproducibility for mcp tool discoverability, response quality, and contract completeness. Evidence should include test output and artifact evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"MCP Tool Availability: Evidence Quality appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the evidence quality evidence for mcp tool availability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-mcp-tools-41","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["mcp","tools","availability","agent","evidence-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:mcp-tools check:41","humanCommand":"Check MCP tool list includes stable names, schemas, and availability; review the evidence-quality evidence dimension for MCP Tool Availability"}},{"id":"ni-mcp-tools-42","testId":"ni-mcp-tools-42","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"MCP Tool Availability: Threshold Policy","description":"Validates threshold clarity, pass/warn/fail semantics, and scoring transparency for mcp tool discoverability, response quality, and contract completeness. Evidence should include threshold and result status evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"MCP Tool Availability: Threshold Policy appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the threshold policy evidence for mcp tool availability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-mcp-tools-42","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["mcp","tools","availability","agent","threshold-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:mcp-tools check:42","humanCommand":"Check MCP tool list includes stable names, schemas, and availability; review the threshold-policy evidence dimension for MCP Tool Availability"}},{"id":"ni-mcp-tools-43","testId":"ni-mcp-tools-43","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"MCP Tool Availability: Confidence","description":"Validates confidence scoring and degraded-input disclosure for mcp tool discoverability, response quality, and contract completeness. Evidence should include source freshness and input availability evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"MCP Tool Availability: Confidence appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the confidence evidence for mcp tool availability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-mcp-tools-43","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["mcp","tools","availability","agent","confidence","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:mcp-tools check:43","humanCommand":"Check MCP tool list includes stable names, schemas, and availability; review the confidence evidence dimension for MCP Tool Availability"}},{"id":"ni-mcp-tools-44","testId":"ni-mcp-tools-44","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"MCP Tool Availability: Trend Readiness","description":"Validates historical comparability and timeline readiness for future reruns for mcp tool discoverability, response quality, and contract completeness. Evidence should include analysis ID, timestamp, and persistence evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"MCP Tool Availability: Trend Readiness appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the trend readiness evidence for mcp tool availability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-mcp-tools-44","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["mcp","tools","availability","agent","trend-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:mcp-tools check:44","humanCommand":"Check MCP tool list includes stable names, schemas, and availability; review the trend-readiness evidence dimension for MCP Tool Availability"}},{"id":"ni-mcp-tools-45","testId":"ni-mcp-tools-45","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"MCP Tool Availability: Ranking Readiness","description":"Validates ranking input completeness and profile compatibility for mcp tool discoverability, response quality, and contract completeness. Evidence should include score and profile evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"MCP Tool Availability: Ranking Readiness appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ranking readiness evidence for mcp tool availability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-mcp-tools-45","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["mcp","tools","availability","agent","ranking-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:mcp-tools check:45","humanCommand":"Check MCP tool list includes stable names, schemas, and availability; review the ranking-readiness evidence dimension for MCP Tool Availability"}},{"id":"ni-mcp-tools-46","testId":"ni-mcp-tools-46","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"MCP Tool Availability: Network Contribution","description":"Validates PlatPhorm network contribution through discovery, integrations, and standards compliance for mcp tool discoverability, response quality, and contract completeness. Evidence should include network graph and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"MCP Tool Availability: Network Contribution appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the network contribution evidence for mcp tool availability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-mcp-tools-46","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["mcp","tools","availability","agent","network-contribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:mcp-tools check:46","humanCommand":"Check MCP tool list includes stable names, schemas, and availability; review the network-contribution evidence dimension for MCP Tool Availability"}},{"id":"ni-mcp-tools-47","testId":"ni-mcp-tools-47","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"MCP Tool Availability: Report Readiness","description":"Validates report/export categorization with public-safe evidence and protected boundaries for mcp tool discoverability, response quality, and contract completeness. Evidence should include report section mapping evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"MCP Tool Availability: Report Readiness appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the report readiness evidence for mcp tool availability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-mcp-tools-47","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["mcp","tools","availability","agent","report-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:mcp-tools check:47","humanCommand":"Check MCP tool list includes stable names, schemas, and availability; review the report-readiness evidence dimension for MCP Tool Availability"}},{"id":"ni-mcp-tools-48","testId":"ni-mcp-tools-48","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"MCP Tool Availability: Operator Actionability","description":"Validates clear remediation, owner action, difficulty, and retest path for mcp tool discoverability, response quality, and contract completeness. Evidence should include fix instructions and command evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"MCP Tool Availability: Operator Actionability appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the operator actionability evidence for mcp tool availability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-mcp-tools-48","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["mcp","tools","availability","agent","operator-actionability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:mcp-tools check:48","humanCommand":"Check MCP tool list includes stable names, schemas, and availability; review the operator-actionability evidence dimension for MCP Tool Availability"}},{"id":"ni-mcp-tools-49","testId":"ni-mcp-tools-49","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"MCP Tool Availability: Degraded State","description":"Validates honest degraded, unavailable, skipped, and not-applicable states for mcp tool discoverability, response quality, and contract completeness. Evidence should include status and storage evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"MCP Tool Availability: Degraded State appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the degraded state evidence for mcp tool availability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-mcp-tools-49","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["mcp","tools","availability","agent","degraded-state","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:mcp-tools check:49","humanCommand":"Check MCP tool list includes stable names, schemas, and availability; review the degraded-state evidence dimension for MCP Tool Availability"}},{"id":"ni-mcp-tools-50","testId":"ni-mcp-tools-50","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"MCP Tool Availability: Reproducibility","description":"Validates stable CLI/API/human reproduction path and deterministic rerun instructions for mcp tool discoverability, response quality, and contract completeness. Evidence should include commands and registry version evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"MCP Tool Availability: Reproducibility appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the reproducibility evidence for mcp tool availability, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-mcp-tools-50","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["mcp","tools","availability","agent","reproducibility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(Object.keys(j).length))\" # group:mcp-tools check:50","humanCommand":"Check MCP tool list includes stable names, schemas, and availability; review the reproducibility evidence dimension for MCP Tool Availability"}},{"id":"ni-api-01","testId":"ni-api-01","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"API Availability and Robustness: Availability","description":"Validates public route availability and successful bounded fetch behavior for api availability, reliability, deterministic responses, and public safety. Evidence should include HTTP status, timeout, and redirect evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"API Availability and Robustness: Availability appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the availability evidence for api availability and robustness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-api-01","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["api","availability","reliability","quality","availability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:api check:1","humanCommand":"Verify API endpoints return stable status, schema, and error contracts; review the availability evidence dimension for API Availability and Robustness"}},{"id":"ni-api-02","testId":"ni-api-02","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"API Availability and Robustness: Public Safety","description":"Validates public-safe access boundaries without exposing private or protected data for api availability, reliability, deterministic responses, and public safety. Evidence should include route policy and response-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"API Availability and Robustness: Public Safety appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the public safety evidence for api availability and robustness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-api-02","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["api","availability","reliability","quality","public-safety","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:api check:2","humanCommand":"Verify API endpoints return stable status, schema, and error contracts; review the public-safety evidence dimension for API Availability and Robustness"}},{"id":"ni-api-03","testId":"ni-api-03","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"API Availability and Robustness: Canonical Url","description":"Validates canonical URL stability and normalized route identity for api availability, reliability, deterministic responses, and public safety. Evidence should include canonical tags, redirects, and normalized URL evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"API Availability and Robustness: Canonical Url appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the canonical url evidence for api availability and robustness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-api-03","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["api","availability","reliability","quality","canonical-url","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:api check:3","humanCommand":"Verify API endpoints return stable status, schema, and error contracts; review the canonical-url evidence dimension for API Availability and Robustness"}},{"id":"ni-api-04","testId":"ni-api-04","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"API Availability and Robustness: Metadata Clarity","description":"Validates title, description, and page-specific metadata clarity for api availability, reliability, deterministic responses, and public safety. Evidence should include HTML metadata and extracted text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"API Availability and Robustness: Metadata Clarity appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the metadata clarity evidence for api availability and robustness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-api-04","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["api","availability","reliability","quality","metadata-clarity","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:api check:4","humanCommand":"Verify API endpoints return stable status, schema, and error contracts; review the metadata-clarity evidence dimension for API Availability and Robustness"}},{"id":"ni-api-05","testId":"ni-api-05","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"API Availability and Robustness: Semantic Structure","description":"Validates semantic HTML structure for humans, agents, and assistive technology for api availability, reliability, deterministic responses, and public safety. Evidence should include heading, landmark, and element evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"API Availability and Robustness: Semantic Structure appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the semantic structure evidence for api availability and robustness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-api-05","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["api","availability","reliability","quality","semantic-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:api check:5","humanCommand":"Verify API endpoints return stable status, schema, and error contracts; review the semantic-structure evidence dimension for API Availability and Robustness"}},{"id":"ni-api-06","testId":"ni-api-06","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"API Availability and Robustness: Machine Readability","description":"Validates machine-readable public content and predictable parsing surfaces for api availability, reliability, deterministic responses, and public safety. Evidence should include structured tags, JSON-LD, and document-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"API Availability and Robustness: Machine Readability appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the machine readability evidence for api availability and robustness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-api-06","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["api","availability","reliability","quality","machine-readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:api check:6","humanCommand":"Verify API endpoints return stable status, schema, and error contracts; review the machine-readability evidence dimension for API Availability and Robustness"}},{"id":"ni-api-07","testId":"ni-api-07","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"API Availability and Robustness: Agent Discovery","description":"Validates agent discovery hints and AI-readable policy/documentation signals for api availability, reliability, deterministic responses, and public safety. Evidence should include llms, policy, MCP, OpenAPI, or schema evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"API Availability and Robustness: Agent Discovery appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the agent discovery evidence for api availability and robustness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-api-07","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["api","availability","reliability","quality","agent-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:api check:7","humanCommand":"Verify API endpoints return stable status, schema, and error contracts; review the agent-discovery evidence dimension for API Availability and Robustness"}},{"id":"ni-api-08","testId":"ni-api-08","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"API Availability and Robustness: Crawler Discovery","description":"Validates crawler discovery paths through robots, sitemap, feeds, and canonical links for api availability, reliability, deterministic responses, and public safety. Evidence should include discovery artifact and link evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"API Availability and Robustness: Crawler Discovery appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the crawler discovery evidence for api availability and robustness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-api-08","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["api","availability","reliability","quality","crawler-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:api check:8","humanCommand":"Verify API endpoints return stable status, schema, and error contracts; review the crawler-discovery evidence dimension for API Availability and Robustness"}},{"id":"ni-api-09","testId":"ni-api-09","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"API Availability and Robustness: Answerability","description":"Validates direct answer extraction and quotable explanatory content for api availability, reliability, deterministic responses, and public safety. Evidence should include question, summary, heading, and paragraph evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"API Availability and Robustness: Answerability appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the answerability evidence for api availability and robustness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-api-09","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["api","availability","reliability","quality","answerability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:api check:9","humanCommand":"Verify API endpoints return stable status, schema, and error contracts; review the answerability evidence dimension for API Availability and Robustness"}},{"id":"ni-api-10","testId":"ni-api-10","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"API Availability and Robustness: Generative Context","description":"Validates GEO context quality for generative engines without inventing measured facts for api availability, reliability, deterministic responses, and public safety. Evidence should include entity, source, and instruction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"API Availability and Robustness: Generative Context appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the generative context evidence for api availability and robustness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-api-10","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["api","availability","reliability","quality","generative-context","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:api check:10","humanCommand":"Verify API endpoints return stable status, schema, and error contracts; review the generative-context evidence dimension for API Availability and Robustness"}},{"id":"ni-api-11","testId":"ni-api-11","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"API Availability and Robustness: Search Intent","description":"Validates search intent alignment and snippet-friendly content structure for api availability, reliability, deterministic responses, and public safety. Evidence should include metadata, headings, and topical text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"API Availability and Robustness: Search Intent appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the search intent evidence for api availability and robustness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-api-11","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["api","availability","reliability","quality","search-intent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:api check:11","humanCommand":"Verify API endpoints return stable status, schema, and error contracts; review the search-intent evidence dimension for API Availability and Robustness"}},{"id":"ni-api-12","testId":"ni-api-12","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"API Availability and Robustness: Accessibility Semantics","description":"Validates accessible names, relationships, landmarks, and keyboard-relevant structure for api availability, reliability, deterministic responses, and public safety. Evidence should include ARIA, labels, landmarks, and control evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"API Availability and Robustness: Accessibility Semantics appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the accessibility semantics evidence for api availability and robustness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-api-12","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["api","availability","reliability","quality","accessibility-semantics","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:api check:12","humanCommand":"Verify API endpoints return stable status, schema, and error contracts; review the accessibility-semantics evidence dimension for API Availability and Robustness"}},{"id":"ni-api-13","testId":"ni-api-13","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"API Availability and Robustness: Mobile Readiness","description":"Validates mobile viewport, responsive content, and touch-friendly layout signals for api availability, reliability, deterministic responses, and public safety. Evidence should include viewport and responsive asset evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"API Availability and Robustness: Mobile Readiness appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the mobile readiness evidence for api availability and robustness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-api-13","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["api","availability","reliability","quality","mobile-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:api check:13","humanCommand":"Verify API endpoints return stable status, schema, and error contracts; review the mobile-readiness evidence dimension for API Availability and Robustness"}},{"id":"ni-api-14","testId":"ni-api-14","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"API Availability and Robustness: Performance Budget","description":"Validates performance budget compliance using measured or bounded deterministic inputs for api availability, reliability, deterministic responses, and public safety. Evidence should include timing, byte, and Lighthouse-derived evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"API Availability and Robustness: Performance Budget appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the performance budget evidence for api availability and robustness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-api-14","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["api","availability","reliability","quality","performance-budget","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:api check:14","humanCommand":"Verify API endpoints return stable status, schema, and error contracts; review the performance-budget evidence dimension for API Availability and Robustness"}},{"id":"ni-api-15","testId":"ni-api-15","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"API Availability and Robustness: Resource Efficiency","description":"Validates resource size, script/style count, and optimization opportunity signals for api availability, reliability, deterministic responses, and public safety. Evidence should include resource and markup evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"API Availability and Robustness: Resource Efficiency appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the resource efficiency evidence for api availability and robustness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-api-15","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["api","availability","reliability","quality","resource-efficiency","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:api check:15","humanCommand":"Verify API endpoints return stable status, schema, and error contracts; review the resource-efficiency evidence dimension for API Availability and Robustness"}},{"id":"ni-api-16","testId":"ni-api-16","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"API Availability and Robustness: Cache Freshness","description":"Validates cache behavior, freshness hints, and stale-content risk for api availability, reliability, deterministic responses, and public safety. Evidence should include HTTP cache and timestamp evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"API Availability and Robustness: Cache Freshness appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the cache freshness evidence for api availability and robustness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-api-16","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["api","availability","reliability","quality","cache-freshness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:api check:16","humanCommand":"Verify API endpoints return stable status, schema, and error contracts; review the cache-freshness evidence dimension for API Availability and Robustness"}},{"id":"ni-api-17","testId":"ni-api-17","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"API Availability and Robustness: Route Reliability","description":"Validates route reliability, redirect safety, and dead-link risk for api availability, reliability, deterministic responses, and public safety. Evidence should include status, redirect, and sitemap evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"API Availability and Robustness: Route Reliability appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the route reliability evidence for api availability and robustness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-api-17","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["api","availability","reliability","quality","route-reliability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:api check:17","humanCommand":"Verify API endpoints return stable status, schema, and error contracts; review the route-reliability evidence dimension for API Availability and Robustness"}},{"id":"ni-api-18","testId":"ni-api-18","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"API Availability and Robustness: Feed Quality","description":"Validates RSS/Atom/feed usefulness, parseability, and freshness for api availability, reliability, deterministic responses, and public safety. Evidence should include feed XML and item evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"API Availability and Robustness: Feed Quality appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the feed quality evidence for api availability and robustness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-api-18","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["api","availability","reliability","quality","feed-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:api check:18","humanCommand":"Verify API endpoints return stable status, schema, and error contracts; review the feed-quality evidence dimension for API Availability and Robustness"}},{"id":"ni-api-19","testId":"ni-api-19","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"API Availability and Robustness: Sitemap Quality","description":"Validates sitemap validity, public-safe URL coverage, and no-dead-link policy for api availability, reliability, deterministic responses, and public safety. Evidence should include sitemap XML and bounded link-check evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"API Availability and Robustness: Sitemap Quality appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the sitemap quality evidence for api availability and robustness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-api-19","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["api","availability","reliability","quality","sitemap-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:api check:19","humanCommand":"Verify API endpoints return stable status, schema, and error contracts; review the sitemap-quality evidence dimension for API Availability and Robustness"}},{"id":"ni-api-20","testId":"ni-api-20","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"API Availability and Robustness: Robots Alignment","description":"Validates robots.txt alignment with public/protected policy and sitemap discovery for api availability, reliability, deterministic responses, and public safety. Evidence should include robots directives and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"API Availability and Robustness: Robots Alignment appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the robots alignment evidence for api availability and robustness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-api-20","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["api","availability","reliability","quality","robots-alignment","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:api check:20","humanCommand":"Verify API endpoints return stable status, schema, and error contracts; review the robots-alignment evidence dimension for API Availability and Robustness"}},{"id":"ni-api-21","testId":"ni-api-21","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"API Availability and Robustness: Llms Structure","description":"Validates llms.txt structure, readability, endpoint coverage, and agent usefulness for api availability, reliability, deterministic responses, and public safety. Evidence should include plain-text section and line-length evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"API Availability and Robustness: Llms Structure appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms structure evidence for api availability and robustness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-api-21","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["api","availability","reliability","quality","llms-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:api check:21","humanCommand":"Verify API endpoints return stable status, schema, and error contracts; review the llms-structure evidence dimension for API Availability and Robustness"}},{"id":"ni-api-22","testId":"ni-api-22","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"API Availability and Robustness: Llms Index Schema","description":"Validates llms-index JSON schema shape and count reconciliation for api availability, reliability, deterministic responses, and public safety. Evidence should include JSON keys, counts, and endpoint evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"API Availability and Robustness: Llms Index Schema appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms index schema evidence for api availability and robustness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-api-22","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["api","availability","reliability","quality","llms-index-schema","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:api check:22","humanCommand":"Verify API endpoints return stable status, schema, and error contracts; review the llms-index-schema evidence dimension for API Availability and Robustness"}},{"id":"ni-api-23","testId":"ni-api-23","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"API Availability and Robustness: Humans Attribution","description":"Validates humans.txt attribution, maintainer, technology, and governance transparency for api availability, reliability, deterministic responses, and public safety. Evidence should include humans.txt section evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"API Availability and Robustness: Humans Attribution appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the humans attribution evidence for api availability and robustness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-api-23","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["api","availability","reliability","quality","humans-attribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:api check:23","humanCommand":"Verify API endpoints return stable status, schema, and error contracts; review the humans-attribution evidence dimension for API Availability and Robustness"}},{"id":"ni-api-24","testId":"ni-api-24","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"API Availability and Robustness: Agent Policy","description":"Validates agent-policy JSON clarity for allowed, disallowed, and protected operations for api availability, reliability, deterministic responses, and public safety. Evidence should include well-known policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"API Availability and Robustness: Agent Policy appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the agent policy evidence for api availability and robustness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-api-24","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["api","availability","reliability","quality","agent-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:api check:24","humanCommand":"Verify API endpoints return stable status, schema, and error contracts; review the agent-policy evidence dimension for API Availability and Robustness"}},{"id":"ni-api-25","testId":"ni-api-25","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"API Availability and Robustness: Ai Policy","description":"Validates AI policy clarity for training, search, answer use, caching, and attribution for api availability, reliability, deterministic responses, and public safety. Evidence should include well-known AI policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"API Availability and Robustness: Ai Policy appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ai policy evidence for api availability and robustness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-api-25","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["api","availability","reliability","quality","ai-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:api check:25","humanCommand":"Verify API endpoints return stable status, schema, and error contracts; review the ai-policy evidence dimension for API Availability and Robustness"}},{"id":"ni-api-26","testId":"ni-api-26","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"API Availability and Robustness: Trust Policy","description":"Validates trust policy coverage for privacy, traceability, metadata, and protected actions for api availability, reliability, deterministic responses, and public safety. Evidence should include trust.json evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"API Availability and Robustness: Trust Policy appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the trust policy evidence for api availability and robustness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-api-26","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["api","availability","reliability","quality","trust-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:api check:26","humanCommand":"Verify API endpoints return stable status, schema, and error contracts; review the trust-policy evidence dimension for API Availability and Robustness"}},{"id":"ni-api-27","testId":"ni-api-27","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"API Availability and Robustness: Openapi Contract","description":"Validates OpenAPI availability, server URL accuracy, schemas, and auth policy for api availability, reliability, deterministic responses, and public safety. Evidence should include OpenAPI text/JSON evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"API Availability and Robustness: Openapi Contract appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the openapi contract evidence for api availability and robustness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-api-27","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["api","availability","reliability","quality","openapi-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:api check:27","humanCommand":"Verify API endpoints return stable status, schema, and error contracts; review the openapi-contract evidence dimension for API Availability and Robustness"}},{"id":"ni-api-28","testId":"ni-api-28","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"API Availability and Robustness: Mcp Contract","description":"Validates MCP JSON-RPC introspection, real tools, resources, and protected boundaries for api availability, reliability, deterministic responses, and public safety. Evidence should include MCP manifest and initialize evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"API Availability and Robustness: Mcp Contract appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the mcp contract evidence for api availability and robustness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-api-28","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["api","availability","reliability","quality","mcp-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:api check:28","humanCommand":"Verify API endpoints return stable status, schema, and error contracts; review the mcp-contract evidence dimension for API Availability and Robustness"}},{"id":"ni-api-29","testId":"ni-api-29","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"API Availability and Robustness: Api Error Shape","description":"Validates API success/error response shape consistency for api availability, reliability, deterministic responses, and public safety. Evidence should include REST envelope evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"API Availability and Robustness: Api Error Shape appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the api error shape evidence for api availability and robustness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-api-29","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["api","availability","reliability","quality","api-error-shape","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:api check:29","humanCommand":"Verify API endpoints return stable status, schema, and error contracts; review the api-error-shape evidence dimension for API Availability and Robustness"}},{"id":"ni-api-30","testId":"ni-api-30","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"API Availability and Robustness: Traceability","description":"Validates trace propagation, request IDs, and safe observability correlation for api availability, reliability, deterministic responses, and public safety. Evidence should include trace header and metadata evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"API Availability and Robustness: Traceability appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the traceability evidence for api availability and robustness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-api-30","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["api","availability","reliability","quality","traceability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:api check:30","humanCommand":"Verify API endpoints return stable status, schema, and error contracts; review the traceability evidence dimension for API Availability and Robustness"}},{"id":"ni-api-31","testId":"ni-api-31","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"API Availability and Robustness: Ja4 Redaction","description":"Validates fingerprint-adjacent metadata redaction and non-public raw JA4 handling for api availability, reliability, deterministic responses, and public safety. Evidence should include metadata policy and redaction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"API Availability and Robustness: Ja4 Redaction appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the ja4 redaction evidence for api availability and robustness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-api-31","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["api","availability","reliability","quality","ja4-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:api check:31","humanCommand":"Verify API endpoints return stable status, schema, and error contracts; review the ja4-redaction evidence dimension for API Availability and Robustness"}},{"id":"ni-api-32","testId":"ni-api-32","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"API Availability and Robustness: Secret Redaction","description":"Validates absence of secrets, generic key examples, cookies, and raw tokens in public outputs for api availability, reliability, deterministic responses, and public safety. Evidence should include public artifact scan evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"API Availability and Robustness: Secret Redaction appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the secret redaction evidence for api availability and robustness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-api-32","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["api","availability","reliability","quality","secret-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:api check:32","humanCommand":"Verify API endpoints return stable status, schema, and error contracts; review the secret-redaction evidence dimension for API Availability and Robustness"}},{"id":"ni-api-33","testId":"ni-api-33","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"API Availability and Robustness: Security Headers","description":"Validates security header coverage and hardened transport signals for api availability, reliability, deterministic responses, and public safety. Evidence should include HTTP header evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"API Availability and Robustness: Security Headers appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the security headers evidence for api availability and robustness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-api-33","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["api","availability","reliability","quality","security-headers","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:api check:33","humanCommand":"Verify API endpoints return stable status, schema, and error contracts; review the security-headers evidence dimension for API Availability and Robustness"}},{"id":"ni-api-34","testId":"ni-api-34","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"API Availability and Robustness: Privacy Consent","description":"Validates privacy policy, consent, attribution, and data-use disclosure quality for api availability, reliability, deterministic responses, and public safety. Evidence should include public page and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"API Availability and Robustness: Privacy Consent appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the privacy consent evidence for api availability and robustness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-api-34","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["api","availability","reliability","quality","privacy-consent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:api check:34","humanCommand":"Verify API endpoints return stable status, schema, and error contracts; review the privacy-consent evidence dimension for API Availability and Robustness"}},{"id":"ni-api-35","testId":"ni-api-35","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"API Availability and Robustness: Structured Data","description":"Validates JSON-LD and entity modeling for machine interpretation for api availability, reliability, deterministic responses, and public safety. Evidence should include schema block and parse evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"API Availability and Robustness: Structured Data appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the structured data evidence for api availability and robustness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-api-35","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["api","availability","reliability","quality","structured-data","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:api check:35","humanCommand":"Verify API endpoints return stable status, schema, and error contracts; review the structured-data evidence dimension for API Availability and Robustness"}},{"id":"ni-api-36","testId":"ni-api-36","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"API Availability and Robustness: Social Preview","description":"Validates Open Graph and Twitter/X card readiness for public sharing for api availability, reliability, deterministic responses, and public safety. Evidence should include meta tag evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"API Availability and Robustness: Social Preview appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the social preview evidence for api availability and robustness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-api-36","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["api","availability","reliability","quality","social-preview","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:api check:36","humanCommand":"Verify API endpoints return stable status, schema, and error contracts; review the social-preview evidence dimension for API Availability and Robustness"}},{"id":"ni-api-37","testId":"ni-api-37","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"API Availability and Robustness: I18n Routing","description":"Validates locale route, hreflang, language declaration, and translation readiness for api availability, reliability, deterministic responses, and public safety. Evidence should include lang/hreflang and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"API Availability and Robustness: I18n Routing appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the i18n routing evidence for api availability and robustness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-api-37","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["api","availability","reliability","quality","i18n-routing","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:api check:37","humanCommand":"Verify API endpoints return stable status, schema, and error contracts; review the i18n-routing evidence dimension for API Availability and Robustness"}},{"id":"ni-api-38","testId":"ni-api-38","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"API Availability and Robustness: Readability","description":"Validates human readability, sectioning, sentence complexity, and comprehension support for api availability, reliability, deterministic responses, and public safety. Evidence should include extracted content evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"API Availability and Robustness: Readability appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the readability evidence for api availability and robustness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-api-38","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["api","availability","reliability","quality","readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:api check:38","humanCommand":"Verify API endpoints return stable status, schema, and error contracts; review the readability evidence dimension for API Availability and Robustness"}},{"id":"ni-api-39","testId":"ni-api-39","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"API Availability and Robustness: Content Utility","description":"Validates non-placeholder content usefulness and domain-specific public value for api availability, reliability, deterministic responses, and public safety. Evidence should include content extraction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"API Availability and Robustness: Content Utility appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the content utility evidence for api availability and robustness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-api-39","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["api","availability","reliability","quality","content-utility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:api check:39","humanCommand":"Verify API endpoints return stable status, schema, and error contracts; review the content-utility evidence dimension for API Availability and Robustness"}},{"id":"ni-api-40","testId":"ni-api-40","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"API Availability and Robustness: Recommendation Grounding","description":"Validates recommendation grounding in deterministic evidence instead of fabricated model output for api availability, reliability, deterministic responses, and public safety. Evidence should include issue and remediation evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"API Availability and Robustness: Recommendation Grounding appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the recommendation grounding evidence for api availability and robustness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-api-40","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["api","availability","reliability","quality","recommendation-grounding","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:api check:40","humanCommand":"Verify API endpoints return stable status, schema, and error contracts; review the recommendation-grounding evidence dimension for API Availability and Robustness"}},{"id":"ni-api-41","testId":"ni-api-41","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"API Availability and Robustness: Evidence Quality","description":"Validates evidence completeness, public safety, and reproducibility for api availability, reliability, deterministic responses, and public safety. Evidence should include test output and artifact evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"API Availability and Robustness: Evidence Quality appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the evidence quality evidence for api availability and robustness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-api-41","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["api","availability","reliability","quality","evidence-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:api check:41","humanCommand":"Verify API endpoints return stable status, schema, and error contracts; review the evidence-quality evidence dimension for API Availability and Robustness"}},{"id":"ni-api-42","testId":"ni-api-42","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"API Availability and Robustness: Threshold Policy","description":"Validates threshold clarity, pass/warn/fail semantics, and scoring transparency for api availability, reliability, deterministic responses, and public safety. Evidence should include threshold and result status evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"API Availability and Robustness: Threshold Policy appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the threshold policy evidence for api availability and robustness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-api-42","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["api","availability","reliability","quality","threshold-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:api check:42","humanCommand":"Verify API endpoints return stable status, schema, and error contracts; review the threshold-policy evidence dimension for API Availability and Robustness"}},{"id":"ni-api-43","testId":"ni-api-43","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"API Availability and Robustness: Confidence","description":"Validates confidence scoring and degraded-input disclosure for api availability, reliability, deterministic responses, and public safety. Evidence should include source freshness and input availability evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"API Availability and Robustness: Confidence appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the confidence evidence for api availability and robustness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-api-43","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["api","availability","reliability","quality","confidence","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:api check:43","humanCommand":"Verify API endpoints return stable status, schema, and error contracts; review the confidence evidence dimension for API Availability and Robustness"}},{"id":"ni-api-44","testId":"ni-api-44","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"API Availability and Robustness: Trend Readiness","description":"Validates historical comparability and timeline readiness for future reruns for api availability, reliability, deterministic responses, and public safety. Evidence should include analysis ID, timestamp, and persistence evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"API Availability and Robustness: Trend Readiness appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the trend readiness evidence for api availability and robustness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-api-44","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["api","availability","reliability","quality","trend-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:api check:44","humanCommand":"Verify API endpoints return stable status, schema, and error contracts; review the trend-readiness evidence dimension for API Availability and Robustness"}},{"id":"ni-api-45","testId":"ni-api-45","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"API Availability and Robustness: Ranking Readiness","description":"Validates ranking input completeness and profile compatibility for api availability, reliability, deterministic responses, and public safety. Evidence should include score and profile evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"API Availability and Robustness: Ranking Readiness appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ranking readiness evidence for api availability and robustness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-api-45","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["api","availability","reliability","quality","ranking-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:api check:45","humanCommand":"Verify API endpoints return stable status, schema, and error contracts; review the ranking-readiness evidence dimension for API Availability and Robustness"}},{"id":"ni-api-46","testId":"ni-api-46","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"API Availability and Robustness: Network Contribution","description":"Validates PlatPhorm network contribution through discovery, integrations, and standards compliance for api availability, reliability, deterministic responses, and public safety. Evidence should include network graph and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"API Availability and Robustness: Network Contribution appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the network contribution evidence for api availability and robustness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-api-46","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["api","availability","reliability","quality","network-contribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:api check:46","humanCommand":"Verify API endpoints return stable status, schema, and error contracts; review the network-contribution evidence dimension for API Availability and Robustness"}},{"id":"ni-api-47","testId":"ni-api-47","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"API Availability and Robustness: Report Readiness","description":"Validates report/export categorization with public-safe evidence and protected boundaries for api availability, reliability, deterministic responses, and public safety. Evidence should include report section mapping evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"API Availability and Robustness: Report Readiness appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the report readiness evidence for api availability and robustness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-api-47","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["api","availability","reliability","quality","report-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:api check:47","humanCommand":"Verify API endpoints return stable status, schema, and error contracts; review the report-readiness evidence dimension for API Availability and Robustness"}},{"id":"ni-api-48","testId":"ni-api-48","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"API Availability and Robustness: Operator Actionability","description":"Validates clear remediation, owner action, difficulty, and retest path for api availability, reliability, deterministic responses, and public safety. Evidence should include fix instructions and command evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"API Availability and Robustness: Operator Actionability appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the operator actionability evidence for api availability and robustness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-api-48","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["api","availability","reliability","quality","operator-actionability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:api check:48","humanCommand":"Verify API endpoints return stable status, schema, and error contracts; review the operator-actionability evidence dimension for API Availability and Robustness"}},{"id":"ni-api-49","testId":"ni-api-49","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"API Availability and Robustness: Degraded State","description":"Validates honest degraded, unavailable, skipped, and not-applicable states for api availability, reliability, deterministic responses, and public safety. Evidence should include status and storage evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"API Availability and Robustness: Degraded State appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the degraded state evidence for api availability and robustness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-api-49","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["api","availability","reliability","quality","degraded-state","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:api check:49","humanCommand":"Verify API endpoints return stable status, schema, and error contracts; review the degraded-state evidence dimension for API Availability and Robustness"}},{"id":"ni-api-50","testId":"ni-api-50","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"API Availability and Robustness: Reproducibility","description":"Validates stable CLI/API/human reproduction path and deterministic rerun instructions for api availability, reliability, deterministic responses, and public safety. Evidence should include commands and registry version evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"API Availability and Robustness: Reproducibility appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the reproducibility evidence for api availability and robustness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-api-50","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["api","availability","reliability","quality","reproducibility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:api check:50","humanCommand":"Verify API endpoints return stable status, schema, and error contracts; review the reproducibility evidence dimension for API Availability and Robustness"}},{"id":"ni-trace-01","testId":"ni-trace-01","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Traceability Evidence: Availability","description":"Validates public route availability and successful bounded fetch behavior for trace propagation, provenance visibility, and reproducible evidence paths. Evidence should include HTTP status, timeout, and redirect evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Traceability Evidence: Availability appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the availability evidence for traceability evidence, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-trace-01","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["traceability","provenance","observability","integrity","availability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.headers.get('x-trace-id')||r.headers.get('x-request-id')||'missing'))\" # group:trace check:1","humanCommand":"Confirm trace IDs are propagated across logs, API responses, and evidence; review the availability evidence dimension for Traceability Evidence"}},{"id":"ni-trace-02","testId":"ni-trace-02","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Traceability Evidence: Public Safety","description":"Validates public-safe access boundaries without exposing private or protected data for trace propagation, provenance visibility, and reproducible evidence paths. Evidence should include route policy and response-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Traceability Evidence: Public Safety appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the public safety evidence for traceability evidence, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-trace-02","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["traceability","provenance","observability","integrity","public-safety","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.headers.get('x-trace-id')||r.headers.get('x-request-id')||'missing'))\" # group:trace check:2","humanCommand":"Confirm trace IDs are propagated across logs, API responses, and evidence; review the public-safety evidence dimension for Traceability Evidence"}},{"id":"ni-trace-03","testId":"ni-trace-03","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Traceability Evidence: Canonical Url","description":"Validates canonical URL stability and normalized route identity for trace propagation, provenance visibility, and reproducible evidence paths. Evidence should include canonical tags, redirects, and normalized URL evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Traceability Evidence: Canonical Url appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the canonical url evidence for traceability evidence, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-trace-03","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["traceability","provenance","observability","integrity","canonical-url","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.headers.get('x-trace-id')||r.headers.get('x-request-id')||'missing'))\" # group:trace check:3","humanCommand":"Confirm trace IDs are propagated across logs, API responses, and evidence; review the canonical-url evidence dimension for Traceability Evidence"}},{"id":"ni-trace-04","testId":"ni-trace-04","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Traceability Evidence: Metadata Clarity","description":"Validates title, description, and page-specific metadata clarity for trace propagation, provenance visibility, and reproducible evidence paths. Evidence should include HTML metadata and extracted text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Traceability Evidence: Metadata Clarity appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the metadata clarity evidence for traceability evidence, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-trace-04","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["traceability","provenance","observability","integrity","metadata-clarity","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.headers.get('x-trace-id')||r.headers.get('x-request-id')||'missing'))\" # group:trace check:4","humanCommand":"Confirm trace IDs are propagated across logs, API responses, and evidence; review the metadata-clarity evidence dimension for Traceability Evidence"}},{"id":"ni-trace-05","testId":"ni-trace-05","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Traceability Evidence: Semantic Structure","description":"Validates semantic HTML structure for humans, agents, and assistive technology for trace propagation, provenance visibility, and reproducible evidence paths. Evidence should include heading, landmark, and element evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Traceability Evidence: Semantic Structure appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the semantic structure evidence for traceability evidence, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-trace-05","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["traceability","provenance","observability","integrity","semantic-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.headers.get('x-trace-id')||r.headers.get('x-request-id')||'missing'))\" # group:trace check:5","humanCommand":"Confirm trace IDs are propagated across logs, API responses, and evidence; review the semantic-structure evidence dimension for Traceability Evidence"}},{"id":"ni-trace-06","testId":"ni-trace-06","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Traceability Evidence: Machine Readability","description":"Validates machine-readable public content and predictable parsing surfaces for trace propagation, provenance visibility, and reproducible evidence paths. Evidence should include structured tags, JSON-LD, and document-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Traceability Evidence: Machine Readability appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the machine readability evidence for traceability evidence, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-trace-06","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["traceability","provenance","observability","integrity","machine-readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.headers.get('x-trace-id')||r.headers.get('x-request-id')||'missing'))\" # group:trace check:6","humanCommand":"Confirm trace IDs are propagated across logs, API responses, and evidence; review the machine-readability evidence dimension for Traceability Evidence"}},{"id":"ni-trace-07","testId":"ni-trace-07","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Traceability Evidence: Agent Discovery","description":"Validates agent discovery hints and AI-readable policy/documentation signals for trace propagation, provenance visibility, and reproducible evidence paths. Evidence should include llms, policy, MCP, OpenAPI, or schema evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Traceability Evidence: Agent Discovery appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the agent discovery evidence for traceability evidence, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-trace-07","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["traceability","provenance","observability","integrity","agent-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.headers.get('x-trace-id')||r.headers.get('x-request-id')||'missing'))\" # group:trace check:7","humanCommand":"Confirm trace IDs are propagated across logs, API responses, and evidence; review the agent-discovery evidence dimension for Traceability Evidence"}},{"id":"ni-trace-08","testId":"ni-trace-08","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Traceability Evidence: Crawler Discovery","description":"Validates crawler discovery paths through robots, sitemap, feeds, and canonical links for trace propagation, provenance visibility, and reproducible evidence paths. Evidence should include discovery artifact and link evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Traceability Evidence: Crawler Discovery appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the crawler discovery evidence for traceability evidence, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-trace-08","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["traceability","provenance","observability","integrity","crawler-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.headers.get('x-trace-id')||r.headers.get('x-request-id')||'missing'))\" # group:trace check:8","humanCommand":"Confirm trace IDs are propagated across logs, API responses, and evidence; review the crawler-discovery evidence dimension for Traceability Evidence"}},{"id":"ni-trace-09","testId":"ni-trace-09","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Traceability Evidence: Answerability","description":"Validates direct answer extraction and quotable explanatory content for trace propagation, provenance visibility, and reproducible evidence paths. Evidence should include question, summary, heading, and paragraph evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Traceability Evidence: Answerability appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the answerability evidence for traceability evidence, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-trace-09","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["traceability","provenance","observability","integrity","answerability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.headers.get('x-trace-id')||r.headers.get('x-request-id')||'missing'))\" # group:trace check:9","humanCommand":"Confirm trace IDs are propagated across logs, API responses, and evidence; review the answerability evidence dimension for Traceability Evidence"}},{"id":"ni-trace-10","testId":"ni-trace-10","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Traceability Evidence: Generative Context","description":"Validates GEO context quality for generative engines without inventing measured facts for trace propagation, provenance visibility, and reproducible evidence paths. Evidence should include entity, source, and instruction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Traceability Evidence: Generative Context appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the generative context evidence for traceability evidence, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-trace-10","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["traceability","provenance","observability","integrity","generative-context","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.headers.get('x-trace-id')||r.headers.get('x-request-id')||'missing'))\" # group:trace check:10","humanCommand":"Confirm trace IDs are propagated across logs, API responses, and evidence; review the generative-context evidence dimension for Traceability Evidence"}},{"id":"ni-trace-11","testId":"ni-trace-11","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Traceability Evidence: Search Intent","description":"Validates search intent alignment and snippet-friendly content structure for trace propagation, provenance visibility, and reproducible evidence paths. Evidence should include metadata, headings, and topical text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Traceability Evidence: Search Intent appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the search intent evidence for traceability evidence, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-trace-11","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["traceability","provenance","observability","integrity","search-intent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.headers.get('x-trace-id')||r.headers.get('x-request-id')||'missing'))\" # group:trace check:11","humanCommand":"Confirm trace IDs are propagated across logs, API responses, and evidence; review the search-intent evidence dimension for Traceability Evidence"}},{"id":"ni-trace-12","testId":"ni-trace-12","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Traceability Evidence: Accessibility Semantics","description":"Validates accessible names, relationships, landmarks, and keyboard-relevant structure for trace propagation, provenance visibility, and reproducible evidence paths. Evidence should include ARIA, labels, landmarks, and control evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Traceability Evidence: Accessibility Semantics appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the accessibility semantics evidence for traceability evidence, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-trace-12","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["traceability","provenance","observability","integrity","accessibility-semantics","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.headers.get('x-trace-id')||r.headers.get('x-request-id')||'missing'))\" # group:trace check:12","humanCommand":"Confirm trace IDs are propagated across logs, API responses, and evidence; review the accessibility-semantics evidence dimension for Traceability Evidence"}},{"id":"ni-trace-13","testId":"ni-trace-13","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Traceability Evidence: Mobile Readiness","description":"Validates mobile viewport, responsive content, and touch-friendly layout signals for trace propagation, provenance visibility, and reproducible evidence paths. Evidence should include viewport and responsive asset evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Traceability Evidence: Mobile Readiness appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the mobile readiness evidence for traceability evidence, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-trace-13","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["traceability","provenance","observability","integrity","mobile-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.headers.get('x-trace-id')||r.headers.get('x-request-id')||'missing'))\" # group:trace check:13","humanCommand":"Confirm trace IDs are propagated across logs, API responses, and evidence; review the mobile-readiness evidence dimension for Traceability Evidence"}},{"id":"ni-trace-14","testId":"ni-trace-14","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Traceability Evidence: Performance Budget","description":"Validates performance budget compliance using measured or bounded deterministic inputs for trace propagation, provenance visibility, and reproducible evidence paths. Evidence should include timing, byte, and Lighthouse-derived evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Traceability Evidence: Performance Budget appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the performance budget evidence for traceability evidence, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-trace-14","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["traceability","provenance","observability","integrity","performance-budget","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.headers.get('x-trace-id')||r.headers.get('x-request-id')||'missing'))\" # group:trace check:14","humanCommand":"Confirm trace IDs are propagated across logs, API responses, and evidence; review the performance-budget evidence dimension for Traceability Evidence"}},{"id":"ni-trace-15","testId":"ni-trace-15","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Traceability Evidence: Resource Efficiency","description":"Validates resource size, script/style count, and optimization opportunity signals for trace propagation, provenance visibility, and reproducible evidence paths. Evidence should include resource and markup evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Traceability Evidence: Resource Efficiency appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the resource efficiency evidence for traceability evidence, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-trace-15","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["traceability","provenance","observability","integrity","resource-efficiency","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.headers.get('x-trace-id')||r.headers.get('x-request-id')||'missing'))\" # group:trace check:15","humanCommand":"Confirm trace IDs are propagated across logs, API responses, and evidence; review the resource-efficiency evidence dimension for Traceability Evidence"}},{"id":"ni-trace-16","testId":"ni-trace-16","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Traceability Evidence: Cache Freshness","description":"Validates cache behavior, freshness hints, and stale-content risk for trace propagation, provenance visibility, and reproducible evidence paths. Evidence should include HTTP cache and timestamp evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Traceability Evidence: Cache Freshness appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the cache freshness evidence for traceability evidence, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-trace-16","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["traceability","provenance","observability","integrity","cache-freshness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.headers.get('x-trace-id')||r.headers.get('x-request-id')||'missing'))\" # group:trace check:16","humanCommand":"Confirm trace IDs are propagated across logs, API responses, and evidence; review the cache-freshness evidence dimension for Traceability Evidence"}},{"id":"ni-trace-17","testId":"ni-trace-17","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Traceability Evidence: Route Reliability","description":"Validates route reliability, redirect safety, and dead-link risk for trace propagation, provenance visibility, and reproducible evidence paths. Evidence should include status, redirect, and sitemap evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Traceability Evidence: Route Reliability appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the route reliability evidence for traceability evidence, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-trace-17","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["traceability","provenance","observability","integrity","route-reliability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.headers.get('x-trace-id')||r.headers.get('x-request-id')||'missing'))\" # group:trace check:17","humanCommand":"Confirm trace IDs are propagated across logs, API responses, and evidence; review the route-reliability evidence dimension for Traceability Evidence"}},{"id":"ni-trace-18","testId":"ni-trace-18","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Traceability Evidence: Feed Quality","description":"Validates RSS/Atom/feed usefulness, parseability, and freshness for trace propagation, provenance visibility, and reproducible evidence paths. Evidence should include feed XML and item evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Traceability Evidence: Feed Quality appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the feed quality evidence for traceability evidence, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-trace-18","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["traceability","provenance","observability","integrity","feed-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.headers.get('x-trace-id')||r.headers.get('x-request-id')||'missing'))\" # group:trace check:18","humanCommand":"Confirm trace IDs are propagated across logs, API responses, and evidence; review the feed-quality evidence dimension for Traceability Evidence"}},{"id":"ni-trace-19","testId":"ni-trace-19","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Traceability Evidence: Sitemap Quality","description":"Validates sitemap validity, public-safe URL coverage, and no-dead-link policy for trace propagation, provenance visibility, and reproducible evidence paths. Evidence should include sitemap XML and bounded link-check evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Traceability Evidence: Sitemap Quality appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the sitemap quality evidence for traceability evidence, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-trace-19","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["traceability","provenance","observability","integrity","sitemap-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.headers.get('x-trace-id')||r.headers.get('x-request-id')||'missing'))\" # group:trace check:19","humanCommand":"Confirm trace IDs are propagated across logs, API responses, and evidence; review the sitemap-quality evidence dimension for Traceability Evidence"}},{"id":"ni-trace-20","testId":"ni-trace-20","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Traceability Evidence: Robots Alignment","description":"Validates robots.txt alignment with public/protected policy and sitemap discovery for trace propagation, provenance visibility, and reproducible evidence paths. Evidence should include robots directives and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Traceability Evidence: Robots Alignment appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the robots alignment evidence for traceability evidence, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-trace-20","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["traceability","provenance","observability","integrity","robots-alignment","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.headers.get('x-trace-id')||r.headers.get('x-request-id')||'missing'))\" # group:trace check:20","humanCommand":"Confirm trace IDs are propagated across logs, API responses, and evidence; review the robots-alignment evidence dimension for Traceability Evidence"}},{"id":"ni-trace-21","testId":"ni-trace-21","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Traceability Evidence: Llms Structure","description":"Validates llms.txt structure, readability, endpoint coverage, and agent usefulness for trace propagation, provenance visibility, and reproducible evidence paths. Evidence should include plain-text section and line-length evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Traceability Evidence: Llms Structure appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms structure evidence for traceability evidence, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-trace-21","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["traceability","provenance","observability","integrity","llms-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.headers.get('x-trace-id')||r.headers.get('x-request-id')||'missing'))\" # group:trace check:21","humanCommand":"Confirm trace IDs are propagated across logs, API responses, and evidence; review the llms-structure evidence dimension for Traceability Evidence"}},{"id":"ni-trace-22","testId":"ni-trace-22","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Traceability Evidence: Llms Index Schema","description":"Validates llms-index JSON schema shape and count reconciliation for trace propagation, provenance visibility, and reproducible evidence paths. Evidence should include JSON keys, counts, and endpoint evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Traceability Evidence: Llms Index Schema appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms index schema evidence for traceability evidence, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-trace-22","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["traceability","provenance","observability","integrity","llms-index-schema","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.headers.get('x-trace-id')||r.headers.get('x-request-id')||'missing'))\" # group:trace check:22","humanCommand":"Confirm trace IDs are propagated across logs, API responses, and evidence; review the llms-index-schema evidence dimension for Traceability Evidence"}},{"id":"ni-trace-23","testId":"ni-trace-23","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Traceability Evidence: Humans Attribution","description":"Validates humans.txt attribution, maintainer, technology, and governance transparency for trace propagation, provenance visibility, and reproducible evidence paths. Evidence should include humans.txt section evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Traceability Evidence: Humans Attribution appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the humans attribution evidence for traceability evidence, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-trace-23","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["traceability","provenance","observability","integrity","humans-attribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.headers.get('x-trace-id')||r.headers.get('x-request-id')||'missing'))\" # group:trace check:23","humanCommand":"Confirm trace IDs are propagated across logs, API responses, and evidence; review the humans-attribution evidence dimension for Traceability Evidence"}},{"id":"ni-trace-24","testId":"ni-trace-24","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Traceability Evidence: Agent Policy","description":"Validates agent-policy JSON clarity for allowed, disallowed, and protected operations for trace propagation, provenance visibility, and reproducible evidence paths. Evidence should include well-known policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Traceability Evidence: Agent Policy appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the agent policy evidence for traceability evidence, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-trace-24","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["traceability","provenance","observability","integrity","agent-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.headers.get('x-trace-id')||r.headers.get('x-request-id')||'missing'))\" # group:trace check:24","humanCommand":"Confirm trace IDs are propagated across logs, API responses, and evidence; review the agent-policy evidence dimension for Traceability Evidence"}},{"id":"ni-trace-25","testId":"ni-trace-25","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Traceability Evidence: Ai Policy","description":"Validates AI policy clarity for training, search, answer use, caching, and attribution for trace propagation, provenance visibility, and reproducible evidence paths. Evidence should include well-known AI policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Traceability Evidence: Ai Policy appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ai policy evidence for traceability evidence, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-trace-25","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["traceability","provenance","observability","integrity","ai-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.headers.get('x-trace-id')||r.headers.get('x-request-id')||'missing'))\" # group:trace check:25","humanCommand":"Confirm trace IDs are propagated across logs, API responses, and evidence; review the ai-policy evidence dimension for Traceability Evidence"}},{"id":"ni-trace-26","testId":"ni-trace-26","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Traceability Evidence: Trust Policy","description":"Validates trust policy coverage for privacy, traceability, metadata, and protected actions for trace propagation, provenance visibility, and reproducible evidence paths. Evidence should include trust.json evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Traceability Evidence: Trust Policy appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the trust policy evidence for traceability evidence, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-trace-26","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["traceability","provenance","observability","integrity","trust-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.headers.get('x-trace-id')||r.headers.get('x-request-id')||'missing'))\" # group:trace check:26","humanCommand":"Confirm trace IDs are propagated across logs, API responses, and evidence; review the trust-policy evidence dimension for Traceability Evidence"}},{"id":"ni-trace-27","testId":"ni-trace-27","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Traceability Evidence: Openapi Contract","description":"Validates OpenAPI availability, server URL accuracy, schemas, and auth policy for trace propagation, provenance visibility, and reproducible evidence paths. Evidence should include OpenAPI text/JSON evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Traceability Evidence: Openapi Contract appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the openapi contract evidence for traceability evidence, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-trace-27","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["traceability","provenance","observability","integrity","openapi-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.headers.get('x-trace-id')||r.headers.get('x-request-id')||'missing'))\" # group:trace check:27","humanCommand":"Confirm trace IDs are propagated across logs, API responses, and evidence; review the openapi-contract evidence dimension for Traceability Evidence"}},{"id":"ni-trace-28","testId":"ni-trace-28","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Traceability Evidence: Mcp Contract","description":"Validates MCP JSON-RPC introspection, real tools, resources, and protected boundaries for trace propagation, provenance visibility, and reproducible evidence paths. Evidence should include MCP manifest and initialize evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Traceability Evidence: Mcp Contract appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the mcp contract evidence for traceability evidence, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-trace-28","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["traceability","provenance","observability","integrity","mcp-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.headers.get('x-trace-id')||r.headers.get('x-request-id')||'missing'))\" # group:trace check:28","humanCommand":"Confirm trace IDs are propagated across logs, API responses, and evidence; review the mcp-contract evidence dimension for Traceability Evidence"}},{"id":"ni-trace-29","testId":"ni-trace-29","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Traceability Evidence: Api Error Shape","description":"Validates API success/error response shape consistency for trace propagation, provenance visibility, and reproducible evidence paths. Evidence should include REST envelope evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Traceability Evidence: Api Error Shape appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the api error shape evidence for traceability evidence, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-trace-29","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["traceability","provenance","observability","integrity","api-error-shape","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.headers.get('x-trace-id')||r.headers.get('x-request-id')||'missing'))\" # group:trace check:29","humanCommand":"Confirm trace IDs are propagated across logs, API responses, and evidence; review the api-error-shape evidence dimension for Traceability Evidence"}},{"id":"ni-trace-30","testId":"ni-trace-30","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Traceability Evidence: Traceability","description":"Validates trace propagation, request IDs, and safe observability correlation for trace propagation, provenance visibility, and reproducible evidence paths. Evidence should include trace header and metadata evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Traceability Evidence: Traceability appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the traceability evidence for traceability evidence, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-trace-30","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["traceability","provenance","observability","integrity","traceability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.headers.get('x-trace-id')||r.headers.get('x-request-id')||'missing'))\" # group:trace check:30","humanCommand":"Confirm trace IDs are propagated across logs, API responses, and evidence; review the traceability evidence dimension for Traceability Evidence"}},{"id":"ni-trace-31","testId":"ni-trace-31","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Traceability Evidence: Ja4 Redaction","description":"Validates fingerprint-adjacent metadata redaction and non-public raw JA4 handling for trace propagation, provenance visibility, and reproducible evidence paths. Evidence should include metadata policy and redaction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Traceability Evidence: Ja4 Redaction appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the ja4 redaction evidence for traceability evidence, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-trace-31","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["traceability","provenance","observability","integrity","ja4-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.headers.get('x-trace-id')||r.headers.get('x-request-id')||'missing'))\" # group:trace check:31","humanCommand":"Confirm trace IDs are propagated across logs, API responses, and evidence; review the ja4-redaction evidence dimension for Traceability Evidence"}},{"id":"ni-trace-32","testId":"ni-trace-32","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Traceability Evidence: Secret Redaction","description":"Validates absence of secrets, generic key examples, cookies, and raw tokens in public outputs for trace propagation, provenance visibility, and reproducible evidence paths. Evidence should include public artifact scan evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Traceability Evidence: Secret Redaction appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the secret redaction evidence for traceability evidence, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-trace-32","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["traceability","provenance","observability","integrity","secret-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.headers.get('x-trace-id')||r.headers.get('x-request-id')||'missing'))\" # group:trace check:32","humanCommand":"Confirm trace IDs are propagated across logs, API responses, and evidence; review the secret-redaction evidence dimension for Traceability Evidence"}},{"id":"ni-trace-33","testId":"ni-trace-33","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Traceability Evidence: Security Headers","description":"Validates security header coverage and hardened transport signals for trace propagation, provenance visibility, and reproducible evidence paths. Evidence should include HTTP header evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Traceability Evidence: Security Headers appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the security headers evidence for traceability evidence, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-trace-33","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["traceability","provenance","observability","integrity","security-headers","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.headers.get('x-trace-id')||r.headers.get('x-request-id')||'missing'))\" # group:trace check:33","humanCommand":"Confirm trace IDs are propagated across logs, API responses, and evidence; review the security-headers evidence dimension for Traceability Evidence"}},{"id":"ni-trace-34","testId":"ni-trace-34","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Traceability Evidence: Privacy Consent","description":"Validates privacy policy, consent, attribution, and data-use disclosure quality for trace propagation, provenance visibility, and reproducible evidence paths. Evidence should include public page and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Traceability Evidence: Privacy Consent appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the privacy consent evidence for traceability evidence, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-trace-34","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["traceability","provenance","observability","integrity","privacy-consent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.headers.get('x-trace-id')||r.headers.get('x-request-id')||'missing'))\" # group:trace check:34","humanCommand":"Confirm trace IDs are propagated across logs, API responses, and evidence; review the privacy-consent evidence dimension for Traceability Evidence"}},{"id":"ni-trace-35","testId":"ni-trace-35","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Traceability Evidence: Structured Data","description":"Validates JSON-LD and entity modeling for machine interpretation for trace propagation, provenance visibility, and reproducible evidence paths. Evidence should include schema block and parse evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Traceability Evidence: Structured Data appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the structured data evidence for traceability evidence, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-trace-35","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["traceability","provenance","observability","integrity","structured-data","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.headers.get('x-trace-id')||r.headers.get('x-request-id')||'missing'))\" # group:trace check:35","humanCommand":"Confirm trace IDs are propagated across logs, API responses, and evidence; review the structured-data evidence dimension for Traceability Evidence"}},{"id":"ni-trace-36","testId":"ni-trace-36","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Traceability Evidence: Social Preview","description":"Validates Open Graph and Twitter/X card readiness for public sharing for trace propagation, provenance visibility, and reproducible evidence paths. Evidence should include meta tag evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Traceability Evidence: Social Preview appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the social preview evidence for traceability evidence, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-trace-36","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["traceability","provenance","observability","integrity","social-preview","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.headers.get('x-trace-id')||r.headers.get('x-request-id')||'missing'))\" # group:trace check:36","humanCommand":"Confirm trace IDs are propagated across logs, API responses, and evidence; review the social-preview evidence dimension for Traceability Evidence"}},{"id":"ni-trace-37","testId":"ni-trace-37","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Traceability Evidence: I18n Routing","description":"Validates locale route, hreflang, language declaration, and translation readiness for trace propagation, provenance visibility, and reproducible evidence paths. Evidence should include lang/hreflang and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Traceability Evidence: I18n Routing appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the i18n routing evidence for traceability evidence, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-trace-37","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["traceability","provenance","observability","integrity","i18n-routing","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.headers.get('x-trace-id')||r.headers.get('x-request-id')||'missing'))\" # group:trace check:37","humanCommand":"Confirm trace IDs are propagated across logs, API responses, and evidence; review the i18n-routing evidence dimension for Traceability Evidence"}},{"id":"ni-trace-38","testId":"ni-trace-38","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Traceability Evidence: Readability","description":"Validates human readability, sectioning, sentence complexity, and comprehension support for trace propagation, provenance visibility, and reproducible evidence paths. Evidence should include extracted content evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Traceability Evidence: Readability appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the readability evidence for traceability evidence, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-trace-38","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["traceability","provenance","observability","integrity","readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.headers.get('x-trace-id')||r.headers.get('x-request-id')||'missing'))\" # group:trace check:38","humanCommand":"Confirm trace IDs are propagated across logs, API responses, and evidence; review the readability evidence dimension for Traceability Evidence"}},{"id":"ni-trace-39","testId":"ni-trace-39","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Traceability Evidence: Content Utility","description":"Validates non-placeholder content usefulness and domain-specific public value for trace propagation, provenance visibility, and reproducible evidence paths. Evidence should include content extraction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Traceability Evidence: Content Utility appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the content utility evidence for traceability evidence, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-trace-39","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["traceability","provenance","observability","integrity","content-utility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.headers.get('x-trace-id')||r.headers.get('x-request-id')||'missing'))\" # group:trace check:39","humanCommand":"Confirm trace IDs are propagated across logs, API responses, and evidence; review the content-utility evidence dimension for Traceability Evidence"}},{"id":"ni-trace-40","testId":"ni-trace-40","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Traceability Evidence: Recommendation Grounding","description":"Validates recommendation grounding in deterministic evidence instead of fabricated model output for trace propagation, provenance visibility, and reproducible evidence paths. Evidence should include issue and remediation evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Traceability Evidence: Recommendation Grounding appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the recommendation grounding evidence for traceability evidence, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-trace-40","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["traceability","provenance","observability","integrity","recommendation-grounding","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.headers.get('x-trace-id')||r.headers.get('x-request-id')||'missing'))\" # group:trace check:40","humanCommand":"Confirm trace IDs are propagated across logs, API responses, and evidence; review the recommendation-grounding evidence dimension for Traceability Evidence"}},{"id":"ni-trace-41","testId":"ni-trace-41","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Traceability Evidence: Evidence Quality","description":"Validates evidence completeness, public safety, and reproducibility for trace propagation, provenance visibility, and reproducible evidence paths. Evidence should include test output and artifact evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Traceability Evidence: Evidence Quality appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the evidence quality evidence for traceability evidence, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-trace-41","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["traceability","provenance","observability","integrity","evidence-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.headers.get('x-trace-id')||r.headers.get('x-request-id')||'missing'))\" # group:trace check:41","humanCommand":"Confirm trace IDs are propagated across logs, API responses, and evidence; review the evidence-quality evidence dimension for Traceability Evidence"}},{"id":"ni-trace-42","testId":"ni-trace-42","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Traceability Evidence: Threshold Policy","description":"Validates threshold clarity, pass/warn/fail semantics, and scoring transparency for trace propagation, provenance visibility, and reproducible evidence paths. Evidence should include threshold and result status evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Traceability Evidence: Threshold Policy appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the threshold policy evidence for traceability evidence, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-trace-42","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["traceability","provenance","observability","integrity","threshold-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.headers.get('x-trace-id')||r.headers.get('x-request-id')||'missing'))\" # group:trace check:42","humanCommand":"Confirm trace IDs are propagated across logs, API responses, and evidence; review the threshold-policy evidence dimension for Traceability Evidence"}},{"id":"ni-trace-43","testId":"ni-trace-43","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Traceability Evidence: Confidence","description":"Validates confidence scoring and degraded-input disclosure for trace propagation, provenance visibility, and reproducible evidence paths. Evidence should include source freshness and input availability evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Traceability Evidence: Confidence appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the confidence evidence for traceability evidence, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-trace-43","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["traceability","provenance","observability","integrity","confidence","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.headers.get('x-trace-id')||r.headers.get('x-request-id')||'missing'))\" # group:trace check:43","humanCommand":"Confirm trace IDs are propagated across logs, API responses, and evidence; review the confidence evidence dimension for Traceability Evidence"}},{"id":"ni-trace-44","testId":"ni-trace-44","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Traceability Evidence: Trend Readiness","description":"Validates historical comparability and timeline readiness for future reruns for trace propagation, provenance visibility, and reproducible evidence paths. Evidence should include analysis ID, timestamp, and persistence evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Traceability Evidence: Trend Readiness appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the trend readiness evidence for traceability evidence, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-trace-44","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["traceability","provenance","observability","integrity","trend-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.headers.get('x-trace-id')||r.headers.get('x-request-id')||'missing'))\" # group:trace check:44","humanCommand":"Confirm trace IDs are propagated across logs, API responses, and evidence; review the trend-readiness evidence dimension for Traceability Evidence"}},{"id":"ni-trace-45","testId":"ni-trace-45","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Traceability Evidence: Ranking Readiness","description":"Validates ranking input completeness and profile compatibility for trace propagation, provenance visibility, and reproducible evidence paths. Evidence should include score and profile evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Traceability Evidence: Ranking Readiness appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ranking readiness evidence for traceability evidence, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-trace-45","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["traceability","provenance","observability","integrity","ranking-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.headers.get('x-trace-id')||r.headers.get('x-request-id')||'missing'))\" # group:trace check:45","humanCommand":"Confirm trace IDs are propagated across logs, API responses, and evidence; review the ranking-readiness evidence dimension for Traceability Evidence"}},{"id":"ni-trace-46","testId":"ni-trace-46","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Traceability Evidence: Network Contribution","description":"Validates PlatPhorm network contribution through discovery, integrations, and standards compliance for trace propagation, provenance visibility, and reproducible evidence paths. Evidence should include network graph and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Traceability Evidence: Network Contribution appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the network contribution evidence for traceability evidence, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-trace-46","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["traceability","provenance","observability","integrity","network-contribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.headers.get('x-trace-id')||r.headers.get('x-request-id')||'missing'))\" # group:trace check:46","humanCommand":"Confirm trace IDs are propagated across logs, API responses, and evidence; review the network-contribution evidence dimension for Traceability Evidence"}},{"id":"ni-trace-47","testId":"ni-trace-47","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Traceability Evidence: Report Readiness","description":"Validates report/export categorization with public-safe evidence and protected boundaries for trace propagation, provenance visibility, and reproducible evidence paths. Evidence should include report section mapping evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Traceability Evidence: Report Readiness appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the report readiness evidence for traceability evidence, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-trace-47","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["traceability","provenance","observability","integrity","report-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.headers.get('x-trace-id')||r.headers.get('x-request-id')||'missing'))\" # group:trace check:47","humanCommand":"Confirm trace IDs are propagated across logs, API responses, and evidence; review the report-readiness evidence dimension for Traceability Evidence"}},{"id":"ni-trace-48","testId":"ni-trace-48","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Traceability Evidence: Operator Actionability","description":"Validates clear remediation, owner action, difficulty, and retest path for trace propagation, provenance visibility, and reproducible evidence paths. Evidence should include fix instructions and command evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Traceability Evidence: Operator Actionability appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the operator actionability evidence for traceability evidence, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-trace-48","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["traceability","provenance","observability","integrity","operator-actionability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.headers.get('x-trace-id')||r.headers.get('x-request-id')||'missing'))\" # group:trace check:48","humanCommand":"Confirm trace IDs are propagated across logs, API responses, and evidence; review the operator-actionability evidence dimension for Traceability Evidence"}},{"id":"ni-trace-49","testId":"ni-trace-49","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Traceability Evidence: Degraded State","description":"Validates honest degraded, unavailable, skipped, and not-applicable states for trace propagation, provenance visibility, and reproducible evidence paths. Evidence should include status and storage evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Traceability Evidence: Degraded State appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the degraded state evidence for traceability evidence, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-trace-49","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["traceability","provenance","observability","integrity","degraded-state","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.headers.get('x-trace-id')||r.headers.get('x-request-id')||'missing'))\" # group:trace check:49","humanCommand":"Confirm trace IDs are propagated across logs, API responses, and evidence; review the degraded-state evidence dimension for Traceability Evidence"}},{"id":"ni-trace-50","testId":"ni-trace-50","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Traceability Evidence: Reproducibility","description":"Validates stable CLI/API/human reproduction path and deterministic rerun instructions for trace propagation, provenance visibility, and reproducible evidence paths. Evidence should include commands and registry version evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Traceability Evidence: Reproducibility appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the reproducibility evidence for traceability evidence, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-trace-50","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["traceability","provenance","observability","integrity","reproducibility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.headers.get('x-trace-id')||r.headers.get('x-request-id')||'missing'))\" # group:trace check:50","humanCommand":"Confirm trace IDs are propagated across logs, API responses, and evidence; review the reproducibility evidence dimension for Traceability Evidence"}},{"id":"ni-quality-01","testId":"ni-quality-01","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Quality Gate Checks: Availability","description":"Validates public route availability and successful bounded fetch behavior for quality gate consistency, remediation quality, and deterministic grading. Evidence should include HTTP status, timeout, and redirect evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Quality Gate Checks: Availability appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the availability evidence for quality gate checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-quality-01","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["quality","gates","determinism","scoring","availability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(j.totalTests||0))\" # group:quality check:1","humanCommand":"Review score stability, remediation depth, and repeatability across runs; review the availability evidence dimension for Quality Gate Checks"}},{"id":"ni-quality-02","testId":"ni-quality-02","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Quality Gate Checks: Public Safety","description":"Validates public-safe access boundaries without exposing private or protected data for quality gate consistency, remediation quality, and deterministic grading. Evidence should include route policy and response-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Quality Gate Checks: Public Safety appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the public safety evidence for quality gate checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-quality-02","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["quality","gates","determinism","scoring","public-safety","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(j.totalTests||0))\" # group:quality check:2","humanCommand":"Review score stability, remediation depth, and repeatability across runs; review the public-safety evidence dimension for Quality Gate Checks"}},{"id":"ni-quality-03","testId":"ni-quality-03","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Quality Gate Checks: Canonical Url","description":"Validates canonical URL stability and normalized route identity for quality gate consistency, remediation quality, and deterministic grading. Evidence should include canonical tags, redirects, and normalized URL evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Quality Gate Checks: Canonical Url appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the canonical url evidence for quality gate checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-quality-03","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["quality","gates","determinism","scoring","canonical-url","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(j.totalTests||0))\" # group:quality check:3","humanCommand":"Review score stability, remediation depth, and repeatability across runs; review the canonical-url evidence dimension for Quality Gate Checks"}},{"id":"ni-quality-04","testId":"ni-quality-04","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Quality Gate Checks: Metadata Clarity","description":"Validates title, description, and page-specific metadata clarity for quality gate consistency, remediation quality, and deterministic grading. Evidence should include HTML metadata and extracted text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Quality Gate Checks: Metadata Clarity appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the metadata clarity evidence for quality gate checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-quality-04","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["quality","gates","determinism","scoring","metadata-clarity","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(j.totalTests||0))\" # group:quality check:4","humanCommand":"Review score stability, remediation depth, and repeatability across runs; review the metadata-clarity evidence dimension for Quality Gate Checks"}},{"id":"ni-quality-05","testId":"ni-quality-05","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Quality Gate Checks: Semantic Structure","description":"Validates semantic HTML structure for humans, agents, and assistive technology for quality gate consistency, remediation quality, and deterministic grading. Evidence should include heading, landmark, and element evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Quality Gate Checks: Semantic Structure appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the semantic structure evidence for quality gate checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-quality-05","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["quality","gates","determinism","scoring","semantic-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(j.totalTests||0))\" # group:quality check:5","humanCommand":"Review score stability, remediation depth, and repeatability across runs; review the semantic-structure evidence dimension for Quality Gate Checks"}},{"id":"ni-quality-06","testId":"ni-quality-06","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Quality Gate Checks: Machine Readability","description":"Validates machine-readable public content and predictable parsing surfaces for quality gate consistency, remediation quality, and deterministic grading. Evidence should include structured tags, JSON-LD, and document-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Quality Gate Checks: Machine Readability appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the machine readability evidence for quality gate checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-quality-06","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["quality","gates","determinism","scoring","machine-readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(j.totalTests||0))\" # group:quality check:6","humanCommand":"Review score stability, remediation depth, and repeatability across runs; review the machine-readability evidence dimension for Quality Gate Checks"}},{"id":"ni-quality-07","testId":"ni-quality-07","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Quality Gate Checks: Agent Discovery","description":"Validates agent discovery hints and AI-readable policy/documentation signals for quality gate consistency, remediation quality, and deterministic grading. Evidence should include llms, policy, MCP, OpenAPI, or schema evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Quality Gate Checks: Agent Discovery appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the agent discovery evidence for quality gate checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-quality-07","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["quality","gates","determinism","scoring","agent-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(j.totalTests||0))\" # group:quality check:7","humanCommand":"Review score stability, remediation depth, and repeatability across runs; review the agent-discovery evidence dimension for Quality Gate Checks"}},{"id":"ni-quality-08","testId":"ni-quality-08","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Quality Gate Checks: Crawler Discovery","description":"Validates crawler discovery paths through robots, sitemap, feeds, and canonical links for quality gate consistency, remediation quality, and deterministic grading. Evidence should include discovery artifact and link evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Quality Gate Checks: Crawler Discovery appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the crawler discovery evidence for quality gate checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-quality-08","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["quality","gates","determinism","scoring","crawler-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(j.totalTests||0))\" # group:quality check:8","humanCommand":"Review score stability, remediation depth, and repeatability across runs; review the crawler-discovery evidence dimension for Quality Gate Checks"}},{"id":"ni-quality-09","testId":"ni-quality-09","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Quality Gate Checks: Answerability","description":"Validates direct answer extraction and quotable explanatory content for quality gate consistency, remediation quality, and deterministic grading. Evidence should include question, summary, heading, and paragraph evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Quality Gate Checks: Answerability appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the answerability evidence for quality gate checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-quality-09","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["quality","gates","determinism","scoring","answerability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(j.totalTests||0))\" # group:quality check:9","humanCommand":"Review score stability, remediation depth, and repeatability across runs; review the answerability evidence dimension for Quality Gate Checks"}},{"id":"ni-quality-10","testId":"ni-quality-10","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Quality Gate Checks: Generative Context","description":"Validates GEO context quality for generative engines without inventing measured facts for quality gate consistency, remediation quality, and deterministic grading. Evidence should include entity, source, and instruction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Quality Gate Checks: Generative Context appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the generative context evidence for quality gate checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-quality-10","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["quality","gates","determinism","scoring","generative-context","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(j.totalTests||0))\" # group:quality check:10","humanCommand":"Review score stability, remediation depth, and repeatability across runs; review the generative-context evidence dimension for Quality Gate Checks"}},{"id":"ni-quality-11","testId":"ni-quality-11","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Quality Gate Checks: Search Intent","description":"Validates search intent alignment and snippet-friendly content structure for quality gate consistency, remediation quality, and deterministic grading. Evidence should include metadata, headings, and topical text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Quality Gate Checks: Search Intent appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the search intent evidence for quality gate checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-quality-11","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["quality","gates","determinism","scoring","search-intent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(j.totalTests||0))\" # group:quality check:11","humanCommand":"Review score stability, remediation depth, and repeatability across runs; review the search-intent evidence dimension for Quality Gate Checks"}},{"id":"ni-quality-12","testId":"ni-quality-12","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Quality Gate Checks: Accessibility Semantics","description":"Validates accessible names, relationships, landmarks, and keyboard-relevant structure for quality gate consistency, remediation quality, and deterministic grading. Evidence should include ARIA, labels, landmarks, and control evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Quality Gate Checks: Accessibility Semantics appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the accessibility semantics evidence for quality gate checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-quality-12","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["quality","gates","determinism","scoring","accessibility-semantics","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(j.totalTests||0))\" # group:quality check:12","humanCommand":"Review score stability, remediation depth, and repeatability across runs; review the accessibility-semantics evidence dimension for Quality Gate Checks"}},{"id":"ni-quality-13","testId":"ni-quality-13","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Quality Gate Checks: Mobile Readiness","description":"Validates mobile viewport, responsive content, and touch-friendly layout signals for quality gate consistency, remediation quality, and deterministic grading. Evidence should include viewport and responsive asset evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Quality Gate Checks: Mobile Readiness appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the mobile readiness evidence for quality gate checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-quality-13","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["quality","gates","determinism","scoring","mobile-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(j.totalTests||0))\" # group:quality check:13","humanCommand":"Review score stability, remediation depth, and repeatability across runs; review the mobile-readiness evidence dimension for Quality Gate Checks"}},{"id":"ni-quality-14","testId":"ni-quality-14","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Quality Gate Checks: Performance Budget","description":"Validates performance budget compliance using measured or bounded deterministic inputs for quality gate consistency, remediation quality, and deterministic grading. Evidence should include timing, byte, and Lighthouse-derived evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Quality Gate Checks: Performance Budget appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the performance budget evidence for quality gate checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-quality-14","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["quality","gates","determinism","scoring","performance-budget","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(j.totalTests||0))\" # group:quality check:14","humanCommand":"Review score stability, remediation depth, and repeatability across runs; review the performance-budget evidence dimension for Quality Gate Checks"}},{"id":"ni-quality-15","testId":"ni-quality-15","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Quality Gate Checks: Resource Efficiency","description":"Validates resource size, script/style count, and optimization opportunity signals for quality gate consistency, remediation quality, and deterministic grading. Evidence should include resource and markup evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Quality Gate Checks: Resource Efficiency appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the resource efficiency evidence for quality gate checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-quality-15","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["quality","gates","determinism","scoring","resource-efficiency","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(j.totalTests||0))\" # group:quality check:15","humanCommand":"Review score stability, remediation depth, and repeatability across runs; review the resource-efficiency evidence dimension for Quality Gate Checks"}},{"id":"ni-quality-16","testId":"ni-quality-16","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Quality Gate Checks: Cache Freshness","description":"Validates cache behavior, freshness hints, and stale-content risk for quality gate consistency, remediation quality, and deterministic grading. Evidence should include HTTP cache and timestamp evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Quality Gate Checks: Cache Freshness appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the cache freshness evidence for quality gate checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-quality-16","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["quality","gates","determinism","scoring","cache-freshness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(j.totalTests||0))\" # group:quality check:16","humanCommand":"Review score stability, remediation depth, and repeatability across runs; review the cache-freshness evidence dimension for Quality Gate Checks"}},{"id":"ni-quality-17","testId":"ni-quality-17","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Quality Gate Checks: Route Reliability","description":"Validates route reliability, redirect safety, and dead-link risk for quality gate consistency, remediation quality, and deterministic grading. Evidence should include status, redirect, and sitemap evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Quality Gate Checks: Route Reliability appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the route reliability evidence for quality gate checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-quality-17","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["quality","gates","determinism","scoring","route-reliability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(j.totalTests||0))\" # group:quality check:17","humanCommand":"Review score stability, remediation depth, and repeatability across runs; review the route-reliability evidence dimension for Quality Gate Checks"}},{"id":"ni-quality-18","testId":"ni-quality-18","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Quality Gate Checks: Feed Quality","description":"Validates RSS/Atom/feed usefulness, parseability, and freshness for quality gate consistency, remediation quality, and deterministic grading. Evidence should include feed XML and item evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Quality Gate Checks: Feed Quality appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the feed quality evidence for quality gate checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-quality-18","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["quality","gates","determinism","scoring","feed-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(j.totalTests||0))\" # group:quality check:18","humanCommand":"Review score stability, remediation depth, and repeatability across runs; review the feed-quality evidence dimension for Quality Gate Checks"}},{"id":"ni-quality-19","testId":"ni-quality-19","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Quality Gate Checks: Sitemap Quality","description":"Validates sitemap validity, public-safe URL coverage, and no-dead-link policy for quality gate consistency, remediation quality, and deterministic grading. Evidence should include sitemap XML and bounded link-check evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Quality Gate Checks: Sitemap Quality appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the sitemap quality evidence for quality gate checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-quality-19","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["quality","gates","determinism","scoring","sitemap-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(j.totalTests||0))\" # group:quality check:19","humanCommand":"Review score stability, remediation depth, and repeatability across runs; review the sitemap-quality evidence dimension for Quality Gate Checks"}},{"id":"ni-quality-20","testId":"ni-quality-20","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Quality Gate Checks: Robots Alignment","description":"Validates robots.txt alignment with public/protected policy and sitemap discovery for quality gate consistency, remediation quality, and deterministic grading. Evidence should include robots directives and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Quality Gate Checks: Robots Alignment appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the robots alignment evidence for quality gate checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-quality-20","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["quality","gates","determinism","scoring","robots-alignment","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(j.totalTests||0))\" # group:quality check:20","humanCommand":"Review score stability, remediation depth, and repeatability across runs; review the robots-alignment evidence dimension for Quality Gate Checks"}},{"id":"ni-quality-21","testId":"ni-quality-21","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Quality Gate Checks: Llms Structure","description":"Validates llms.txt structure, readability, endpoint coverage, and agent usefulness for quality gate consistency, remediation quality, and deterministic grading. Evidence should include plain-text section and line-length evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Quality Gate Checks: Llms Structure appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms structure evidence for quality gate checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-quality-21","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["quality","gates","determinism","scoring","llms-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(j.totalTests||0))\" # group:quality check:21","humanCommand":"Review score stability, remediation depth, and repeatability across runs; review the llms-structure evidence dimension for Quality Gate Checks"}},{"id":"ni-quality-22","testId":"ni-quality-22","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Quality Gate Checks: Llms Index Schema","description":"Validates llms-index JSON schema shape and count reconciliation for quality gate consistency, remediation quality, and deterministic grading. Evidence should include JSON keys, counts, and endpoint evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Quality Gate Checks: Llms Index Schema appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms index schema evidence for quality gate checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-quality-22","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["quality","gates","determinism","scoring","llms-index-schema","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(j.totalTests||0))\" # group:quality check:22","humanCommand":"Review score stability, remediation depth, and repeatability across runs; review the llms-index-schema evidence dimension for Quality Gate Checks"}},{"id":"ni-quality-23","testId":"ni-quality-23","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Quality Gate Checks: Humans Attribution","description":"Validates humans.txt attribution, maintainer, technology, and governance transparency for quality gate consistency, remediation quality, and deterministic grading. Evidence should include humans.txt section evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Quality Gate Checks: Humans Attribution appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the humans attribution evidence for quality gate checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-quality-23","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["quality","gates","determinism","scoring","humans-attribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(j.totalTests||0))\" # group:quality check:23","humanCommand":"Review score stability, remediation depth, and repeatability across runs; review the humans-attribution evidence dimension for Quality Gate Checks"}},{"id":"ni-quality-24","testId":"ni-quality-24","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Quality Gate Checks: Agent Policy","description":"Validates agent-policy JSON clarity for allowed, disallowed, and protected operations for quality gate consistency, remediation quality, and deterministic grading. Evidence should include well-known policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Quality Gate Checks: Agent Policy appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the agent policy evidence for quality gate checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-quality-24","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["quality","gates","determinism","scoring","agent-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(j.totalTests||0))\" # group:quality check:24","humanCommand":"Review score stability, remediation depth, and repeatability across runs; review the agent-policy evidence dimension for Quality Gate Checks"}},{"id":"ni-quality-25","testId":"ni-quality-25","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Quality Gate Checks: Ai Policy","description":"Validates AI policy clarity for training, search, answer use, caching, and attribution for quality gate consistency, remediation quality, and deterministic grading. Evidence should include well-known AI policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Quality Gate Checks: Ai Policy appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ai policy evidence for quality gate checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-quality-25","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["quality","gates","determinism","scoring","ai-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(j.totalTests||0))\" # group:quality check:25","humanCommand":"Review score stability, remediation depth, and repeatability across runs; review the ai-policy evidence dimension for Quality Gate Checks"}},{"id":"ni-quality-26","testId":"ni-quality-26","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Quality Gate Checks: Trust Policy","description":"Validates trust policy coverage for privacy, traceability, metadata, and protected actions for quality gate consistency, remediation quality, and deterministic grading. Evidence should include trust.json evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Quality Gate Checks: Trust Policy appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the trust policy evidence for quality gate checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-quality-26","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["quality","gates","determinism","scoring","trust-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(j.totalTests||0))\" # group:quality check:26","humanCommand":"Review score stability, remediation depth, and repeatability across runs; review the trust-policy evidence dimension for Quality Gate Checks"}},{"id":"ni-quality-27","testId":"ni-quality-27","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Quality Gate Checks: Openapi Contract","description":"Validates OpenAPI availability, server URL accuracy, schemas, and auth policy for quality gate consistency, remediation quality, and deterministic grading. Evidence should include OpenAPI text/JSON evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Quality Gate Checks: Openapi Contract appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the openapi contract evidence for quality gate checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-quality-27","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["quality","gates","determinism","scoring","openapi-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(j.totalTests||0))\" # group:quality check:27","humanCommand":"Review score stability, remediation depth, and repeatability across runs; review the openapi-contract evidence dimension for Quality Gate Checks"}},{"id":"ni-quality-28","testId":"ni-quality-28","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Quality Gate Checks: Mcp Contract","description":"Validates MCP JSON-RPC introspection, real tools, resources, and protected boundaries for quality gate consistency, remediation quality, and deterministic grading. Evidence should include MCP manifest and initialize evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Quality Gate Checks: Mcp Contract appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the mcp contract evidence for quality gate checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-quality-28","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["quality","gates","determinism","scoring","mcp-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(j.totalTests||0))\" # group:quality check:28","humanCommand":"Review score stability, remediation depth, and repeatability across runs; review the mcp-contract evidence dimension for Quality Gate Checks"}},{"id":"ni-quality-29","testId":"ni-quality-29","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Quality Gate Checks: Api Error Shape","description":"Validates API success/error response shape consistency for quality gate consistency, remediation quality, and deterministic grading. Evidence should include REST envelope evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Quality Gate Checks: Api Error Shape appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the api error shape evidence for quality gate checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-quality-29","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["quality","gates","determinism","scoring","api-error-shape","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(j.totalTests||0))\" # group:quality check:29","humanCommand":"Review score stability, remediation depth, and repeatability across runs; review the api-error-shape evidence dimension for Quality Gate Checks"}},{"id":"ni-quality-30","testId":"ni-quality-30","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Quality Gate Checks: Traceability","description":"Validates trace propagation, request IDs, and safe observability correlation for quality gate consistency, remediation quality, and deterministic grading. Evidence should include trace header and metadata evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Quality Gate Checks: Traceability appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the traceability evidence for quality gate checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-quality-30","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["quality","gates","determinism","scoring","traceability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(j.totalTests||0))\" # group:quality check:30","humanCommand":"Review score stability, remediation depth, and repeatability across runs; review the traceability evidence dimension for Quality Gate Checks"}},{"id":"ni-quality-31","testId":"ni-quality-31","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Quality Gate Checks: Ja4 Redaction","description":"Validates fingerprint-adjacent metadata redaction and non-public raw JA4 handling for quality gate consistency, remediation quality, and deterministic grading. Evidence should include metadata policy and redaction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Quality Gate Checks: Ja4 Redaction appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the ja4 redaction evidence for quality gate checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-quality-31","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["quality","gates","determinism","scoring","ja4-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(j.totalTests||0))\" # group:quality check:31","humanCommand":"Review score stability, remediation depth, and repeatability across runs; review the ja4-redaction evidence dimension for Quality Gate Checks"}},{"id":"ni-quality-32","testId":"ni-quality-32","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Quality Gate Checks: Secret Redaction","description":"Validates absence of secrets, generic key examples, cookies, and raw tokens in public outputs for quality gate consistency, remediation quality, and deterministic grading. Evidence should include public artifact scan evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Quality Gate Checks: Secret Redaction appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the secret redaction evidence for quality gate checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-quality-32","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["quality","gates","determinism","scoring","secret-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(j.totalTests||0))\" # group:quality check:32","humanCommand":"Review score stability, remediation depth, and repeatability across runs; review the secret-redaction evidence dimension for Quality Gate Checks"}},{"id":"ni-quality-33","testId":"ni-quality-33","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Quality Gate Checks: Security Headers","description":"Validates security header coverage and hardened transport signals for quality gate consistency, remediation quality, and deterministic grading. Evidence should include HTTP header evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Quality Gate Checks: Security Headers appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the security headers evidence for quality gate checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-quality-33","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["quality","gates","determinism","scoring","security-headers","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(j.totalTests||0))\" # group:quality check:33","humanCommand":"Review score stability, remediation depth, and repeatability across runs; review the security-headers evidence dimension for Quality Gate Checks"}},{"id":"ni-quality-34","testId":"ni-quality-34","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Quality Gate Checks: Privacy Consent","description":"Validates privacy policy, consent, attribution, and data-use disclosure quality for quality gate consistency, remediation quality, and deterministic grading. Evidence should include public page and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Quality Gate Checks: Privacy Consent appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the privacy consent evidence for quality gate checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-quality-34","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["quality","gates","determinism","scoring","privacy-consent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(j.totalTests||0))\" # group:quality check:34","humanCommand":"Review score stability, remediation depth, and repeatability across runs; review the privacy-consent evidence dimension for Quality Gate Checks"}},{"id":"ni-quality-35","testId":"ni-quality-35","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Quality Gate Checks: Structured Data","description":"Validates JSON-LD and entity modeling for machine interpretation for quality gate consistency, remediation quality, and deterministic grading. Evidence should include schema block and parse evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Quality Gate Checks: Structured Data appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the structured data evidence for quality gate checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-quality-35","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["quality","gates","determinism","scoring","structured-data","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(j.totalTests||0))\" # group:quality check:35","humanCommand":"Review score stability, remediation depth, and repeatability across runs; review the structured-data evidence dimension for Quality Gate Checks"}},{"id":"ni-quality-36","testId":"ni-quality-36","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Quality Gate Checks: Social Preview","description":"Validates Open Graph and Twitter/X card readiness for public sharing for quality gate consistency, remediation quality, and deterministic grading. Evidence should include meta tag evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Quality Gate Checks: Social Preview appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the social preview evidence for quality gate checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-quality-36","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["quality","gates","determinism","scoring","social-preview","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(j.totalTests||0))\" # group:quality check:36","humanCommand":"Review score stability, remediation depth, and repeatability across runs; review the social-preview evidence dimension for Quality Gate Checks"}},{"id":"ni-quality-37","testId":"ni-quality-37","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Quality Gate Checks: I18n Routing","description":"Validates locale route, hreflang, language declaration, and translation readiness for quality gate consistency, remediation quality, and deterministic grading. Evidence should include lang/hreflang and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Quality Gate Checks: I18n Routing appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the i18n routing evidence for quality gate checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-quality-37","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["quality","gates","determinism","scoring","i18n-routing","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(j.totalTests||0))\" # group:quality check:37","humanCommand":"Review score stability, remediation depth, and repeatability across runs; review the i18n-routing evidence dimension for Quality Gate Checks"}},{"id":"ni-quality-38","testId":"ni-quality-38","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Quality Gate Checks: Readability","description":"Validates human readability, sectioning, sentence complexity, and comprehension support for quality gate consistency, remediation quality, and deterministic grading. Evidence should include extracted content evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Quality Gate Checks: Readability appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the readability evidence for quality gate checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-quality-38","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["quality","gates","determinism","scoring","readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(j.totalTests||0))\" # group:quality check:38","humanCommand":"Review score stability, remediation depth, and repeatability across runs; review the readability evidence dimension for Quality Gate Checks"}},{"id":"ni-quality-39","testId":"ni-quality-39","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Quality Gate Checks: Content Utility","description":"Validates non-placeholder content usefulness and domain-specific public value for quality gate consistency, remediation quality, and deterministic grading. Evidence should include content extraction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Quality Gate Checks: Content Utility appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the content utility evidence for quality gate checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-quality-39","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["quality","gates","determinism","scoring","content-utility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(j.totalTests||0))\" # group:quality check:39","humanCommand":"Review score stability, remediation depth, and repeatability across runs; review the content-utility evidence dimension for Quality Gate Checks"}},{"id":"ni-quality-40","testId":"ni-quality-40","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Quality Gate Checks: Recommendation Grounding","description":"Validates recommendation grounding in deterministic evidence instead of fabricated model output for quality gate consistency, remediation quality, and deterministic grading. Evidence should include issue and remediation evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Quality Gate Checks: Recommendation Grounding appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the recommendation grounding evidence for quality gate checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-quality-40","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["quality","gates","determinism","scoring","recommendation-grounding","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(j.totalTests||0))\" # group:quality check:40","humanCommand":"Review score stability, remediation depth, and repeatability across runs; review the recommendation-grounding evidence dimension for Quality Gate Checks"}},{"id":"ni-quality-41","testId":"ni-quality-41","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Quality Gate Checks: Evidence Quality","description":"Validates evidence completeness, public safety, and reproducibility for quality gate consistency, remediation quality, and deterministic grading. Evidence should include test output and artifact evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Quality Gate Checks: Evidence Quality appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the evidence quality evidence for quality gate checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-quality-41","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["quality","gates","determinism","scoring","evidence-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(j.totalTests||0))\" # group:quality check:41","humanCommand":"Review score stability, remediation depth, and repeatability across runs; review the evidence-quality evidence dimension for Quality Gate Checks"}},{"id":"ni-quality-42","testId":"ni-quality-42","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Quality Gate Checks: Threshold Policy","description":"Validates threshold clarity, pass/warn/fail semantics, and scoring transparency for quality gate consistency, remediation quality, and deterministic grading. Evidence should include threshold and result status evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Quality Gate Checks: Threshold Policy appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the threshold policy evidence for quality gate checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-quality-42","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["quality","gates","determinism","scoring","threshold-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(j.totalTests||0))\" # group:quality check:42","humanCommand":"Review score stability, remediation depth, and repeatability across runs; review the threshold-policy evidence dimension for Quality Gate Checks"}},{"id":"ni-quality-43","testId":"ni-quality-43","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Quality Gate Checks: Confidence","description":"Validates confidence scoring and degraded-input disclosure for quality gate consistency, remediation quality, and deterministic grading. Evidence should include source freshness and input availability evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Quality Gate Checks: Confidence appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the confidence evidence for quality gate checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-quality-43","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["quality","gates","determinism","scoring","confidence","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(j.totalTests||0))\" # group:quality check:43","humanCommand":"Review score stability, remediation depth, and repeatability across runs; review the confidence evidence dimension for Quality Gate Checks"}},{"id":"ni-quality-44","testId":"ni-quality-44","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Quality Gate Checks: Trend Readiness","description":"Validates historical comparability and timeline readiness for future reruns for quality gate consistency, remediation quality, and deterministic grading. Evidence should include analysis ID, timestamp, and persistence evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Quality Gate Checks: Trend Readiness appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the trend readiness evidence for quality gate checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-quality-44","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["quality","gates","determinism","scoring","trend-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(j.totalTests||0))\" # group:quality check:44","humanCommand":"Review score stability, remediation depth, and repeatability across runs; review the trend-readiness evidence dimension for Quality Gate Checks"}},{"id":"ni-quality-45","testId":"ni-quality-45","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Quality Gate Checks: Ranking Readiness","description":"Validates ranking input completeness and profile compatibility for quality gate consistency, remediation quality, and deterministic grading. Evidence should include score and profile evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Quality Gate Checks: Ranking Readiness appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ranking readiness evidence for quality gate checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-quality-45","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["quality","gates","determinism","scoring","ranking-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(j.totalTests||0))\" # group:quality check:45","humanCommand":"Review score stability, remediation depth, and repeatability across runs; review the ranking-readiness evidence dimension for Quality Gate Checks"}},{"id":"ni-quality-46","testId":"ni-quality-46","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Quality Gate Checks: Network Contribution","description":"Validates PlatPhorm network contribution through discovery, integrations, and standards compliance for quality gate consistency, remediation quality, and deterministic grading. Evidence should include network graph and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Quality Gate Checks: Network Contribution appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the network contribution evidence for quality gate checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-quality-46","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["quality","gates","determinism","scoring","network-contribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(j.totalTests||0))\" # group:quality check:46","humanCommand":"Review score stability, remediation depth, and repeatability across runs; review the network-contribution evidence dimension for Quality Gate Checks"}},{"id":"ni-quality-47","testId":"ni-quality-47","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Quality Gate Checks: Report Readiness","description":"Validates report/export categorization with public-safe evidence and protected boundaries for quality gate consistency, remediation quality, and deterministic grading. Evidence should include report section mapping evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Quality Gate Checks: Report Readiness appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the report readiness evidence for quality gate checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-quality-47","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["quality","gates","determinism","scoring","report-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(j.totalTests||0))\" # group:quality check:47","humanCommand":"Review score stability, remediation depth, and repeatability across runs; review the report-readiness evidence dimension for Quality Gate Checks"}},{"id":"ni-quality-48","testId":"ni-quality-48","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Quality Gate Checks: Operator Actionability","description":"Validates clear remediation, owner action, difficulty, and retest path for quality gate consistency, remediation quality, and deterministic grading. Evidence should include fix instructions and command evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Quality Gate Checks: Operator Actionability appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the operator actionability evidence for quality gate checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-quality-48","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["quality","gates","determinism","scoring","operator-actionability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(j.totalTests||0))\" # group:quality check:48","humanCommand":"Review score stability, remediation depth, and repeatability across runs; review the operator-actionability evidence dimension for Quality Gate Checks"}},{"id":"ni-quality-49","testId":"ni-quality-49","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Quality Gate Checks: Degraded State","description":"Validates honest degraded, unavailable, skipped, and not-applicable states for quality gate consistency, remediation quality, and deterministic grading. Evidence should include status and storage evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Quality Gate Checks: Degraded State appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the degraded state evidence for quality gate checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-quality-49","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["quality","gates","determinism","scoring","degraded-state","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(j.totalTests||0))\" # group:quality check:49","humanCommand":"Review score stability, remediation depth, and repeatability across runs; review the degraded-state evidence dimension for Quality Gate Checks"}},{"id":"ni-quality-50","testId":"ni-quality-50","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Quality Gate Checks: Reproducibility","description":"Validates stable CLI/API/human reproduction path and deterministic rerun instructions for quality gate consistency, remediation quality, and deterministic grading. Evidence should include commands and registry version evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Quality Gate Checks: Reproducibility appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the reproducibility evidence for quality gate checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-quality-50","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["quality","gates","determinism","scoring","reproducibility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>r.json()).then(j=>console.log(j.totalTests||0))\" # group:quality check:50","humanCommand":"Review score stability, remediation depth, and repeatability across runs; review the reproducibility evidence dimension for Quality Gate Checks"}},{"id":"ni-speed-01","testId":"ni-speed-01","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Speed and Latency Checks: Availability","description":"Validates public route availability and successful bounded fetch behavior for speed budgets, latency signals, and runtime performance stability. Evidence should include HTTP status, timeout, and redirect evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Speed and Latency Checks: Availability appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with measured evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the availability evidence for speed and latency checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-speed-01","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["speed","latency","performance","core-web-vitals","availability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --output=json # group:speed check:1","humanCommand":"Measure latency and loading stability on mobile and desktop profiles; review the availability evidence dimension for Speed and Latency Checks"}},{"id":"ni-speed-02","testId":"ni-speed-02","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Speed and Latency Checks: Public Safety","description":"Validates public-safe access boundaries without exposing private or protected data for speed budgets, latency signals, and runtime performance stability. Evidence should include route policy and response-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Speed and Latency Checks: Public Safety appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with measured evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the public safety evidence for speed and latency checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-speed-02","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["speed","latency","performance","core-web-vitals","public-safety","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --output=json # group:speed check:2","humanCommand":"Measure latency and loading stability on mobile and desktop profiles; review the public-safety evidence dimension for Speed and Latency Checks"}},{"id":"ni-speed-03","testId":"ni-speed-03","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Speed and Latency Checks: Canonical Url","description":"Validates canonical URL stability and normalized route identity for speed budgets, latency signals, and runtime performance stability. Evidence should include canonical tags, redirects, and normalized URL evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Speed and Latency Checks: Canonical Url appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with measured evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the canonical url evidence for speed and latency checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-speed-03","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["speed","latency","performance","core-web-vitals","canonical-url","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --output=json # group:speed check:3","humanCommand":"Measure latency and loading stability on mobile and desktop profiles; review the canonical-url evidence dimension for Speed and Latency Checks"}},{"id":"ni-speed-04","testId":"ni-speed-04","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Speed and Latency Checks: Metadata Clarity","description":"Validates title, description, and page-specific metadata clarity for speed budgets, latency signals, and runtime performance stability. Evidence should include HTML metadata and extracted text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Speed and Latency Checks: Metadata Clarity appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with measured evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the metadata clarity evidence for speed and latency checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-speed-04","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["speed","latency","performance","core-web-vitals","metadata-clarity","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --output=json # group:speed check:4","humanCommand":"Measure latency and loading stability on mobile and desktop profiles; review the metadata-clarity evidence dimension for Speed and Latency Checks"}},{"id":"ni-speed-05","testId":"ni-speed-05","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Speed and Latency Checks: Semantic Structure","description":"Validates semantic HTML structure for humans, agents, and assistive technology for speed budgets, latency signals, and runtime performance stability. Evidence should include heading, landmark, and element evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Speed and Latency Checks: Semantic Structure appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with measured evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the semantic structure evidence for speed and latency checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-speed-05","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["speed","latency","performance","core-web-vitals","semantic-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --output=json # group:speed check:5","humanCommand":"Measure latency and loading stability on mobile and desktop profiles; review the semantic-structure evidence dimension for Speed and Latency Checks"}},{"id":"ni-speed-06","testId":"ni-speed-06","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Speed and Latency Checks: Machine Readability","description":"Validates machine-readable public content and predictable parsing surfaces for speed budgets, latency signals, and runtime performance stability. Evidence should include structured tags, JSON-LD, and document-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Speed and Latency Checks: Machine Readability appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with measured evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the machine readability evidence for speed and latency checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-speed-06","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["speed","latency","performance","core-web-vitals","machine-readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --output=json # group:speed check:6","humanCommand":"Measure latency and loading stability on mobile and desktop profiles; review the machine-readability evidence dimension for Speed and Latency Checks"}},{"id":"ni-speed-07","testId":"ni-speed-07","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Speed and Latency Checks: Agent Discovery","description":"Validates agent discovery hints and AI-readable policy/documentation signals for speed budgets, latency signals, and runtime performance stability. Evidence should include llms, policy, MCP, OpenAPI, or schema evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Speed and Latency Checks: Agent Discovery appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with measured evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the agent discovery evidence for speed and latency checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-speed-07","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["speed","latency","performance","core-web-vitals","agent-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --output=json # group:speed check:7","humanCommand":"Measure latency and loading stability on mobile and desktop profiles; review the agent-discovery evidence dimension for Speed and Latency Checks"}},{"id":"ni-speed-08","testId":"ni-speed-08","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Speed and Latency Checks: Crawler Discovery","description":"Validates crawler discovery paths through robots, sitemap, feeds, and canonical links for speed budgets, latency signals, and runtime performance stability. Evidence should include discovery artifact and link evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Speed and Latency Checks: Crawler Discovery appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with measured evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the crawler discovery evidence for speed and latency checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-speed-08","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["speed","latency","performance","core-web-vitals","crawler-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --output=json # group:speed check:8","humanCommand":"Measure latency and loading stability on mobile and desktop profiles; review the crawler-discovery evidence dimension for Speed and Latency Checks"}},{"id":"ni-speed-09","testId":"ni-speed-09","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Speed and Latency Checks: Answerability","description":"Validates direct answer extraction and quotable explanatory content for speed budgets, latency signals, and runtime performance stability. Evidence should include question, summary, heading, and paragraph evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Speed and Latency Checks: Answerability appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with measured evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the answerability evidence for speed and latency checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-speed-09","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["speed","latency","performance","core-web-vitals","answerability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --output=json # group:speed check:9","humanCommand":"Measure latency and loading stability on mobile and desktop profiles; review the answerability evidence dimension for Speed and Latency Checks"}},{"id":"ni-speed-10","testId":"ni-speed-10","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Speed and Latency Checks: Generative Context","description":"Validates GEO context quality for generative engines without inventing measured facts for speed budgets, latency signals, and runtime performance stability. Evidence should include entity, source, and instruction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Speed and Latency Checks: Generative Context appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with measured evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the generative context evidence for speed and latency checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-speed-10","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["speed","latency","performance","core-web-vitals","generative-context","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --output=json # group:speed check:10","humanCommand":"Measure latency and loading stability on mobile and desktop profiles; review the generative-context evidence dimension for Speed and Latency Checks"}},{"id":"ni-speed-11","testId":"ni-speed-11","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Speed and Latency Checks: Search Intent","description":"Validates search intent alignment and snippet-friendly content structure for speed budgets, latency signals, and runtime performance stability. Evidence should include metadata, headings, and topical text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Speed and Latency Checks: Search Intent appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with measured evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the search intent evidence for speed and latency checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-speed-11","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["speed","latency","performance","core-web-vitals","search-intent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --output=json # group:speed check:11","humanCommand":"Measure latency and loading stability on mobile and desktop profiles; review the search-intent evidence dimension for Speed and Latency Checks"}},{"id":"ni-speed-12","testId":"ni-speed-12","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Speed and Latency Checks: Accessibility Semantics","description":"Validates accessible names, relationships, landmarks, and keyboard-relevant structure for speed budgets, latency signals, and runtime performance stability. Evidence should include ARIA, labels, landmarks, and control evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Speed and Latency Checks: Accessibility Semantics appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with measured evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the accessibility semantics evidence for speed and latency checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-speed-12","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["speed","latency","performance","core-web-vitals","accessibility-semantics","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --output=json # group:speed check:12","humanCommand":"Measure latency and loading stability on mobile and desktop profiles; review the accessibility-semantics evidence dimension for Speed and Latency Checks"}},{"id":"ni-speed-13","testId":"ni-speed-13","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Speed and Latency Checks: Mobile Readiness","description":"Validates mobile viewport, responsive content, and touch-friendly layout signals for speed budgets, latency signals, and runtime performance stability. Evidence should include viewport and responsive asset evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Speed and Latency Checks: Mobile Readiness appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with measured evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the mobile readiness evidence for speed and latency checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-speed-13","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["speed","latency","performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --output=json # group:speed check:13","humanCommand":"Measure latency and loading stability on mobile and desktop profiles; review the mobile-readiness evidence dimension for Speed and Latency Checks"}},{"id":"ni-speed-14","testId":"ni-speed-14","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Speed and Latency Checks: Performance Budget","description":"Validates performance budget compliance using measured or bounded deterministic inputs for speed budgets, latency signals, and runtime performance stability. Evidence should include timing, byte, and Lighthouse-derived evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Speed and Latency Checks: Performance Budget appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with measured evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the performance budget evidence for speed and latency checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-speed-14","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["speed","latency","performance","core-web-vitals","performance-budget","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --output=json # group:speed check:14","humanCommand":"Measure latency and loading stability on mobile and desktop profiles; review the performance-budget evidence dimension for Speed and Latency Checks"}},{"id":"ni-speed-15","testId":"ni-speed-15","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Speed and Latency Checks: Resource Efficiency","description":"Validates resource size, script/style count, and optimization opportunity signals for speed budgets, latency signals, and runtime performance stability. Evidence should include resource and markup evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Speed and Latency Checks: Resource Efficiency appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with measured evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the resource efficiency evidence for speed and latency checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-speed-15","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["speed","latency","performance","core-web-vitals","resource-efficiency","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --output=json # group:speed check:15","humanCommand":"Measure latency and loading stability on mobile and desktop profiles; review the resource-efficiency evidence dimension for Speed and Latency Checks"}},{"id":"ni-speed-16","testId":"ni-speed-16","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Speed and Latency Checks: Cache Freshness","description":"Validates cache behavior, freshness hints, and stale-content risk for speed budgets, latency signals, and runtime performance stability. Evidence should include HTTP cache and timestamp evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Speed and Latency Checks: Cache Freshness appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with measured evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the cache freshness evidence for speed and latency checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-speed-16","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["speed","latency","performance","core-web-vitals","cache-freshness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --output=json # group:speed check:16","humanCommand":"Measure latency and loading stability on mobile and desktop profiles; review the cache-freshness evidence dimension for Speed and Latency Checks"}},{"id":"ni-speed-17","testId":"ni-speed-17","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Speed and Latency Checks: Route Reliability","description":"Validates route reliability, redirect safety, and dead-link risk for speed budgets, latency signals, and runtime performance stability. Evidence should include status, redirect, and sitemap evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Speed and Latency Checks: Route Reliability appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with measured evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the route reliability evidence for speed and latency checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-speed-17","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["speed","latency","performance","core-web-vitals","route-reliability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --output=json # group:speed check:17","humanCommand":"Measure latency and loading stability on mobile and desktop profiles; review the route-reliability evidence dimension for Speed and Latency Checks"}},{"id":"ni-speed-18","testId":"ni-speed-18","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Speed and Latency Checks: Feed Quality","description":"Validates RSS/Atom/feed usefulness, parseability, and freshness for speed budgets, latency signals, and runtime performance stability. Evidence should include feed XML and item evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Speed and Latency Checks: Feed Quality appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with measured evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the feed quality evidence for speed and latency checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-speed-18","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["speed","latency","performance","core-web-vitals","feed-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --output=json # group:speed check:18","humanCommand":"Measure latency and loading stability on mobile and desktop profiles; review the feed-quality evidence dimension for Speed and Latency Checks"}},{"id":"ni-speed-19","testId":"ni-speed-19","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Speed and Latency Checks: Sitemap Quality","description":"Validates sitemap validity, public-safe URL coverage, and no-dead-link policy for speed budgets, latency signals, and runtime performance stability. Evidence should include sitemap XML and bounded link-check evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Speed and Latency Checks: Sitemap Quality appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with measured evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the sitemap quality evidence for speed and latency checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-speed-19","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["speed","latency","performance","core-web-vitals","sitemap-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --output=json # group:speed check:19","humanCommand":"Measure latency and loading stability on mobile and desktop profiles; review the sitemap-quality evidence dimension for Speed and Latency Checks"}},{"id":"ni-speed-20","testId":"ni-speed-20","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Speed and Latency Checks: Robots Alignment","description":"Validates robots.txt alignment with public/protected policy and sitemap discovery for speed budgets, latency signals, and runtime performance stability. Evidence should include robots directives and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Speed and Latency Checks: Robots Alignment appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with measured evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the robots alignment evidence for speed and latency checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-speed-20","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["speed","latency","performance","core-web-vitals","robots-alignment","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --output=json # group:speed check:20","humanCommand":"Measure latency and loading stability on mobile and desktop profiles; review the robots-alignment evidence dimension for Speed and Latency Checks"}},{"id":"ni-speed-21","testId":"ni-speed-21","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Speed and Latency Checks: Llms Structure","description":"Validates llms.txt structure, readability, endpoint coverage, and agent usefulness for speed budgets, latency signals, and runtime performance stability. Evidence should include plain-text section and line-length evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Speed and Latency Checks: Llms Structure appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with measured evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms structure evidence for speed and latency checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-speed-21","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["speed","latency","performance","core-web-vitals","llms-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --output=json # group:speed check:21","humanCommand":"Measure latency and loading stability on mobile and desktop profiles; review the llms-structure evidence dimension for Speed and Latency Checks"}},{"id":"ni-speed-22","testId":"ni-speed-22","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Speed and Latency Checks: Llms Index Schema","description":"Validates llms-index JSON schema shape and count reconciliation for speed budgets, latency signals, and runtime performance stability. Evidence should include JSON keys, counts, and endpoint evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Speed and Latency Checks: Llms Index Schema appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with measured evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms index schema evidence for speed and latency checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-speed-22","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["speed","latency","performance","core-web-vitals","llms-index-schema","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --output=json # group:speed check:22","humanCommand":"Measure latency and loading stability on mobile and desktop profiles; review the llms-index-schema evidence dimension for Speed and Latency Checks"}},{"id":"ni-speed-23","testId":"ni-speed-23","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Speed and Latency Checks: Humans Attribution","description":"Validates humans.txt attribution, maintainer, technology, and governance transparency for speed budgets, latency signals, and runtime performance stability. Evidence should include humans.txt section evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Speed and Latency Checks: Humans Attribution appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with measured evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the humans attribution evidence for speed and latency checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-speed-23","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["speed","latency","performance","core-web-vitals","humans-attribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --output=json # group:speed check:23","humanCommand":"Measure latency and loading stability on mobile and desktop profiles; review the humans-attribution evidence dimension for Speed and Latency Checks"}},{"id":"ni-speed-24","testId":"ni-speed-24","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Speed and Latency Checks: Agent Policy","description":"Validates agent-policy JSON clarity for allowed, disallowed, and protected operations for speed budgets, latency signals, and runtime performance stability. Evidence should include well-known policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Speed and Latency Checks: Agent Policy appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with measured evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the agent policy evidence for speed and latency checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-speed-24","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["speed","latency","performance","core-web-vitals","agent-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --output=json # group:speed check:24","humanCommand":"Measure latency and loading stability on mobile and desktop profiles; review the agent-policy evidence dimension for Speed and Latency Checks"}},{"id":"ni-speed-25","testId":"ni-speed-25","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Speed and Latency Checks: Ai Policy","description":"Validates AI policy clarity for training, search, answer use, caching, and attribution for speed budgets, latency signals, and runtime performance stability. Evidence should include well-known AI policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Speed and Latency Checks: Ai Policy appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with measured evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ai policy evidence for speed and latency checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-speed-25","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["speed","latency","performance","core-web-vitals","ai-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --output=json # group:speed check:25","humanCommand":"Measure latency and loading stability on mobile and desktop profiles; review the ai-policy evidence dimension for Speed and Latency Checks"}},{"id":"ni-speed-26","testId":"ni-speed-26","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Speed and Latency Checks: Trust Policy","description":"Validates trust policy coverage for privacy, traceability, metadata, and protected actions for speed budgets, latency signals, and runtime performance stability. Evidence should include trust.json evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Speed and Latency Checks: Trust Policy appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with measured evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the trust policy evidence for speed and latency checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-speed-26","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["speed","latency","performance","core-web-vitals","trust-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --output=json # group:speed check:26","humanCommand":"Measure latency and loading stability on mobile and desktop profiles; review the trust-policy evidence dimension for Speed and Latency Checks"}},{"id":"ni-speed-27","testId":"ni-speed-27","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Speed and Latency Checks: Openapi Contract","description":"Validates OpenAPI availability, server URL accuracy, schemas, and auth policy for speed budgets, latency signals, and runtime performance stability. Evidence should include OpenAPI text/JSON evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Speed and Latency Checks: Openapi Contract appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with measured evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the openapi contract evidence for speed and latency checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-speed-27","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["speed","latency","performance","core-web-vitals","openapi-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --output=json # group:speed check:27","humanCommand":"Measure latency and loading stability on mobile and desktop profiles; review the openapi-contract evidence dimension for Speed and Latency Checks"}},{"id":"ni-speed-28","testId":"ni-speed-28","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Speed and Latency Checks: Mcp Contract","description":"Validates MCP JSON-RPC introspection, real tools, resources, and protected boundaries for speed budgets, latency signals, and runtime performance stability. Evidence should include MCP manifest and initialize evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Speed and Latency Checks: Mcp Contract appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with measured evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the mcp contract evidence for speed and latency checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-speed-28","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["speed","latency","performance","core-web-vitals","mcp-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --output=json # group:speed check:28","humanCommand":"Measure latency and loading stability on mobile and desktop profiles; review the mcp-contract evidence dimension for Speed and Latency Checks"}},{"id":"ni-speed-29","testId":"ni-speed-29","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Speed and Latency Checks: Api Error Shape","description":"Validates API success/error response shape consistency for speed budgets, latency signals, and runtime performance stability. Evidence should include REST envelope evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Speed and Latency Checks: Api Error Shape appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with measured evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the api error shape evidence for speed and latency checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-speed-29","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["speed","latency","performance","core-web-vitals","api-error-shape","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --output=json # group:speed check:29","humanCommand":"Measure latency and loading stability on mobile and desktop profiles; review the api-error-shape evidence dimension for Speed and Latency Checks"}},{"id":"ni-speed-30","testId":"ni-speed-30","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Speed and Latency Checks: Traceability","description":"Validates trace propagation, request IDs, and safe observability correlation for speed budgets, latency signals, and runtime performance stability. Evidence should include trace header and metadata evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Speed and Latency Checks: Traceability appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with measured evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the traceability evidence for speed and latency checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-speed-30","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["speed","latency","performance","core-web-vitals","traceability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --output=json # group:speed check:30","humanCommand":"Measure latency and loading stability on mobile and desktop profiles; review the traceability evidence dimension for Speed and Latency Checks"}},{"id":"ni-speed-31","testId":"ni-speed-31","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Speed and Latency Checks: Ja4 Redaction","description":"Validates fingerprint-adjacent metadata redaction and non-public raw JA4 handling for speed budgets, latency signals, and runtime performance stability. Evidence should include metadata policy and redaction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Speed and Latency Checks: Ja4 Redaction appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with measured evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the ja4 redaction evidence for speed and latency checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-speed-31","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["speed","latency","performance","core-web-vitals","ja4-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --output=json # group:speed check:31","humanCommand":"Measure latency and loading stability on mobile and desktop profiles; review the ja4-redaction evidence dimension for Speed and Latency Checks"}},{"id":"ni-speed-32","testId":"ni-speed-32","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Speed and Latency Checks: Secret Redaction","description":"Validates absence of secrets, generic key examples, cookies, and raw tokens in public outputs for speed budgets, latency signals, and runtime performance stability. Evidence should include public artifact scan evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Speed and Latency Checks: Secret Redaction appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with measured evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the secret redaction evidence for speed and latency checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-speed-32","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["speed","latency","performance","core-web-vitals","secret-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --output=json # group:speed check:32","humanCommand":"Measure latency and loading stability on mobile and desktop profiles; review the secret-redaction evidence dimension for Speed and Latency Checks"}},{"id":"ni-speed-33","testId":"ni-speed-33","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Speed and Latency Checks: Security Headers","description":"Validates security header coverage and hardened transport signals for speed budgets, latency signals, and runtime performance stability. Evidence should include HTTP header evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Speed and Latency Checks: Security Headers appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with measured evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the security headers evidence for speed and latency checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-speed-33","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["speed","latency","performance","core-web-vitals","security-headers","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --output=json # group:speed check:33","humanCommand":"Measure latency and loading stability on mobile and desktop profiles; review the security-headers evidence dimension for Speed and Latency Checks"}},{"id":"ni-speed-34","testId":"ni-speed-34","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Speed and Latency Checks: Privacy Consent","description":"Validates privacy policy, consent, attribution, and data-use disclosure quality for speed budgets, latency signals, and runtime performance stability. Evidence should include public page and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Speed and Latency Checks: Privacy Consent appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with measured evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the privacy consent evidence for speed and latency checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-speed-34","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["speed","latency","performance","core-web-vitals","privacy-consent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --output=json # group:speed check:34","humanCommand":"Measure latency and loading stability on mobile and desktop profiles; review the privacy-consent evidence dimension for Speed and Latency Checks"}},{"id":"ni-speed-35","testId":"ni-speed-35","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Speed and Latency Checks: Structured Data","description":"Validates JSON-LD and entity modeling for machine interpretation for speed budgets, latency signals, and runtime performance stability. Evidence should include schema block and parse evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Speed and Latency Checks: Structured Data appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with measured evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the structured data evidence for speed and latency checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-speed-35","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["speed","latency","performance","core-web-vitals","structured-data","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --output=json # group:speed check:35","humanCommand":"Measure latency and loading stability on mobile and desktop profiles; review the structured-data evidence dimension for Speed and Latency Checks"}},{"id":"ni-speed-36","testId":"ni-speed-36","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Speed and Latency Checks: Social Preview","description":"Validates Open Graph and Twitter/X card readiness for public sharing for speed budgets, latency signals, and runtime performance stability. Evidence should include meta tag evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Speed and Latency Checks: Social Preview appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with measured evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the social preview evidence for speed and latency checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-speed-36","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["speed","latency","performance","core-web-vitals","social-preview","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --output=json # group:speed check:36","humanCommand":"Measure latency and loading stability on mobile and desktop profiles; review the social-preview evidence dimension for Speed and Latency Checks"}},{"id":"ni-speed-37","testId":"ni-speed-37","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Speed and Latency Checks: I18n Routing","description":"Validates locale route, hreflang, language declaration, and translation readiness for speed budgets, latency signals, and runtime performance stability. Evidence should include lang/hreflang and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Speed and Latency Checks: I18n Routing appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with measured evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the i18n routing evidence for speed and latency checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-speed-37","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["speed","latency","performance","core-web-vitals","i18n-routing","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --output=json # group:speed check:37","humanCommand":"Measure latency and loading stability on mobile and desktop profiles; review the i18n-routing evidence dimension for Speed and Latency Checks"}},{"id":"ni-speed-38","testId":"ni-speed-38","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Speed and Latency Checks: Readability","description":"Validates human readability, sectioning, sentence complexity, and comprehension support for speed budgets, latency signals, and runtime performance stability. Evidence should include extracted content evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Speed and Latency Checks: Readability appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with measured evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the readability evidence for speed and latency checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-speed-38","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["speed","latency","performance","core-web-vitals","readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --output=json # group:speed check:38","humanCommand":"Measure latency and loading stability on mobile and desktop profiles; review the readability evidence dimension for Speed and Latency Checks"}},{"id":"ni-speed-39","testId":"ni-speed-39","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Speed and Latency Checks: Content Utility","description":"Validates non-placeholder content usefulness and domain-specific public value for speed budgets, latency signals, and runtime performance stability. Evidence should include content extraction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Speed and Latency Checks: Content Utility appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with measured evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the content utility evidence for speed and latency checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-speed-39","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["speed","latency","performance","core-web-vitals","content-utility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --output=json # group:speed check:39","humanCommand":"Measure latency and loading stability on mobile and desktop profiles; review the content-utility evidence dimension for Speed and Latency Checks"}},{"id":"ni-speed-40","testId":"ni-speed-40","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Speed and Latency Checks: Recommendation Grounding","description":"Validates recommendation grounding in deterministic evidence instead of fabricated model output for speed budgets, latency signals, and runtime performance stability. Evidence should include issue and remediation evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Speed and Latency Checks: Recommendation Grounding appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with measured evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the recommendation grounding evidence for speed and latency checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-speed-40","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["speed","latency","performance","core-web-vitals","recommendation-grounding","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --output=json # group:speed check:40","humanCommand":"Measure latency and loading stability on mobile and desktop profiles; review the recommendation-grounding evidence dimension for Speed and Latency Checks"}},{"id":"ni-speed-41","testId":"ni-speed-41","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Speed and Latency Checks: Evidence Quality","description":"Validates evidence completeness, public safety, and reproducibility for speed budgets, latency signals, and runtime performance stability. Evidence should include test output and artifact evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Speed and Latency Checks: Evidence Quality appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with measured evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the evidence quality evidence for speed and latency checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-speed-41","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["speed","latency","performance","core-web-vitals","evidence-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --output=json # group:speed check:41","humanCommand":"Measure latency and loading stability on mobile and desktop profiles; review the evidence-quality evidence dimension for Speed and Latency Checks"}},{"id":"ni-speed-42","testId":"ni-speed-42","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Speed and Latency Checks: Threshold Policy","description":"Validates threshold clarity, pass/warn/fail semantics, and scoring transparency for speed budgets, latency signals, and runtime performance stability. Evidence should include threshold and result status evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Speed and Latency Checks: Threshold Policy appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with measured evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the threshold policy evidence for speed and latency checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-speed-42","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["speed","latency","performance","core-web-vitals","threshold-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --output=json # group:speed check:42","humanCommand":"Measure latency and loading stability on mobile and desktop profiles; review the threshold-policy evidence dimension for Speed and Latency Checks"}},{"id":"ni-speed-43","testId":"ni-speed-43","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Speed and Latency Checks: Confidence","description":"Validates confidence scoring and degraded-input disclosure for speed budgets, latency signals, and runtime performance stability. Evidence should include source freshness and input availability evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Speed and Latency Checks: Confidence appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with measured evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the confidence evidence for speed and latency checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-speed-43","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["speed","latency","performance","core-web-vitals","confidence","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --output=json # group:speed check:43","humanCommand":"Measure latency and loading stability on mobile and desktop profiles; review the confidence evidence dimension for Speed and Latency Checks"}},{"id":"ni-speed-44","testId":"ni-speed-44","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Speed and Latency Checks: Trend Readiness","description":"Validates historical comparability and timeline readiness for future reruns for speed budgets, latency signals, and runtime performance stability. Evidence should include analysis ID, timestamp, and persistence evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Speed and Latency Checks: Trend Readiness appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with measured evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the trend readiness evidence for speed and latency checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-speed-44","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["speed","latency","performance","core-web-vitals","trend-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --output=json # group:speed check:44","humanCommand":"Measure latency and loading stability on mobile and desktop profiles; review the trend-readiness evidence dimension for Speed and Latency Checks"}},{"id":"ni-speed-45","testId":"ni-speed-45","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Speed and Latency Checks: Ranking Readiness","description":"Validates ranking input completeness and profile compatibility for speed budgets, latency signals, and runtime performance stability. Evidence should include score and profile evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Speed and Latency Checks: Ranking Readiness appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with measured evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ranking readiness evidence for speed and latency checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-speed-45","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["speed","latency","performance","core-web-vitals","ranking-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --output=json # group:speed check:45","humanCommand":"Measure latency and loading stability on mobile and desktop profiles; review the ranking-readiness evidence dimension for Speed and Latency Checks"}},{"id":"ni-speed-46","testId":"ni-speed-46","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Speed and Latency Checks: Network Contribution","description":"Validates PlatPhorm network contribution through discovery, integrations, and standards compliance for speed budgets, latency signals, and runtime performance stability. Evidence should include network graph and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Speed and Latency Checks: Network Contribution appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with measured evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the network contribution evidence for speed and latency checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-speed-46","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["speed","latency","performance","core-web-vitals","network-contribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --output=json # group:speed check:46","humanCommand":"Measure latency and loading stability on mobile and desktop profiles; review the network-contribution evidence dimension for Speed and Latency Checks"}},{"id":"ni-speed-47","testId":"ni-speed-47","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Speed and Latency Checks: Report Readiness","description":"Validates report/export categorization with public-safe evidence and protected boundaries for speed budgets, latency signals, and runtime performance stability. Evidence should include report section mapping evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Speed and Latency Checks: Report Readiness appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with measured evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the report readiness evidence for speed and latency checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-speed-47","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["speed","latency","performance","core-web-vitals","report-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --output=json # group:speed check:47","humanCommand":"Measure latency and loading stability on mobile and desktop profiles; review the report-readiness evidence dimension for Speed and Latency Checks"}},{"id":"ni-speed-48","testId":"ni-speed-48","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Speed and Latency Checks: Operator Actionability","description":"Validates clear remediation, owner action, difficulty, and retest path for speed budgets, latency signals, and runtime performance stability. Evidence should include fix instructions and command evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Speed and Latency Checks: Operator Actionability appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with measured evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the operator actionability evidence for speed and latency checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-speed-48","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["speed","latency","performance","core-web-vitals","operator-actionability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --output=json # group:speed check:48","humanCommand":"Measure latency and loading stability on mobile and desktop profiles; review the operator-actionability evidence dimension for Speed and Latency Checks"}},{"id":"ni-speed-49","testId":"ni-speed-49","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Speed and Latency Checks: Degraded State","description":"Validates honest degraded, unavailable, skipped, and not-applicable states for speed budgets, latency signals, and runtime performance stability. Evidence should include status and storage evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Speed and Latency Checks: Degraded State appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with measured evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the degraded state evidence for speed and latency checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-speed-49","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["speed","latency","performance","core-web-vitals","degraded-state","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --output=json # group:speed check:49","humanCommand":"Measure latency and loading stability on mobile and desktop profiles; review the degraded-state evidence dimension for Speed and Latency Checks"}},{"id":"ni-speed-50","testId":"ni-speed-50","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Speed and Latency Checks: Reproducibility","description":"Validates stable CLI/API/human reproduction path and deterministic rerun instructions for speed budgets, latency signals, and runtime performance stability. Evidence should include commands and registry version evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Speed and Latency Checks: Reproducibility appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with measured evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the reproducibility evidence for speed and latency checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-speed-50","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["speed","latency","performance","core-web-vitals","reproducibility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --output=json # group:speed check:50","humanCommand":"Measure latency and loading stability on mobile and desktop profiles; review the reproducibility evidence dimension for Speed and Latency Checks"}},{"id":"ni-route-01","testId":"ni-route-01","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Route Integrity Checks: Availability","description":"Validates public route availability and successful bounded fetch behavior for route compliance, canonical pathways, and crawl-safe navigation integrity. Evidence should include HTTP status, timeout, and redirect evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Route Integrity Checks: Availability appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the availability evidence for route integrity checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-route-01","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["routes","integrity","navigation","crawlability","availability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com',{redirect:'manual'}).then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:route check:1","humanCommand":"Verify redirects, canonical targets, and route accessibility consistency; review the availability evidence dimension for Route Integrity Checks"}},{"id":"ni-route-02","testId":"ni-route-02","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Route Integrity Checks: Public Safety","description":"Validates public-safe access boundaries without exposing private or protected data for route compliance, canonical pathways, and crawl-safe navigation integrity. Evidence should include route policy and response-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Route Integrity Checks: Public Safety appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the public safety evidence for route integrity checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-route-02","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["routes","integrity","navigation","crawlability","public-safety","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com',{redirect:'manual'}).then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:route check:2","humanCommand":"Verify redirects, canonical targets, and route accessibility consistency; review the public-safety evidence dimension for Route Integrity Checks"}},{"id":"ni-route-03","testId":"ni-route-03","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Route Integrity Checks: Canonical Url","description":"Validates canonical URL stability and normalized route identity for route compliance, canonical pathways, and crawl-safe navigation integrity. Evidence should include canonical tags, redirects, and normalized URL evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Route Integrity Checks: Canonical Url appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the canonical url evidence for route integrity checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-route-03","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["routes","integrity","navigation","crawlability","canonical-url","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com',{redirect:'manual'}).then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:route check:3","humanCommand":"Verify redirects, canonical targets, and route accessibility consistency; review the canonical-url evidence dimension for Route Integrity Checks"}},{"id":"ni-route-04","testId":"ni-route-04","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Route Integrity Checks: Metadata Clarity","description":"Validates title, description, and page-specific metadata clarity for route compliance, canonical pathways, and crawl-safe navigation integrity. Evidence should include HTML metadata and extracted text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Route Integrity Checks: Metadata Clarity appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the metadata clarity evidence for route integrity checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-route-04","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["routes","integrity","navigation","crawlability","metadata-clarity","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com',{redirect:'manual'}).then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:route check:4","humanCommand":"Verify redirects, canonical targets, and route accessibility consistency; review the metadata-clarity evidence dimension for Route Integrity Checks"}},{"id":"ni-route-05","testId":"ni-route-05","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Route Integrity Checks: Semantic Structure","description":"Validates semantic HTML structure for humans, agents, and assistive technology for route compliance, canonical pathways, and crawl-safe navigation integrity. Evidence should include heading, landmark, and element evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Route Integrity Checks: Semantic Structure appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the semantic structure evidence for route integrity checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-route-05","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["routes","integrity","navigation","crawlability","semantic-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com',{redirect:'manual'}).then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:route check:5","humanCommand":"Verify redirects, canonical targets, and route accessibility consistency; review the semantic-structure evidence dimension for Route Integrity Checks"}},{"id":"ni-route-06","testId":"ni-route-06","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Route Integrity Checks: Machine Readability","description":"Validates machine-readable public content and predictable parsing surfaces for route compliance, canonical pathways, and crawl-safe navigation integrity. Evidence should include structured tags, JSON-LD, and document-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Route Integrity Checks: Machine Readability appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the machine readability evidence for route integrity checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-route-06","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["routes","integrity","navigation","crawlability","machine-readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com',{redirect:'manual'}).then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:route check:6","humanCommand":"Verify redirects, canonical targets, and route accessibility consistency; review the machine-readability evidence dimension for Route Integrity Checks"}},{"id":"ni-route-07","testId":"ni-route-07","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Route Integrity Checks: Agent Discovery","description":"Validates agent discovery hints and AI-readable policy/documentation signals for route compliance, canonical pathways, and crawl-safe navigation integrity. Evidence should include llms, policy, MCP, OpenAPI, or schema evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Route Integrity Checks: Agent Discovery appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the agent discovery evidence for route integrity checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-route-07","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["routes","integrity","navigation","crawlability","agent-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com',{redirect:'manual'}).then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:route check:7","humanCommand":"Verify redirects, canonical targets, and route accessibility consistency; review the agent-discovery evidence dimension for Route Integrity Checks"}},{"id":"ni-route-08","testId":"ni-route-08","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Route Integrity Checks: Crawler Discovery","description":"Validates crawler discovery paths through robots, sitemap, feeds, and canonical links for route compliance, canonical pathways, and crawl-safe navigation integrity. Evidence should include discovery artifact and link evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Route Integrity Checks: Crawler Discovery appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the crawler discovery evidence for route integrity checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-route-08","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["routes","integrity","navigation","crawlability","crawler-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com',{redirect:'manual'}).then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:route check:8","humanCommand":"Verify redirects, canonical targets, and route accessibility consistency; review the crawler-discovery evidence dimension for Route Integrity Checks"}},{"id":"ni-route-09","testId":"ni-route-09","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Route Integrity Checks: Answerability","description":"Validates direct answer extraction and quotable explanatory content for route compliance, canonical pathways, and crawl-safe navigation integrity. Evidence should include question, summary, heading, and paragraph evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Route Integrity Checks: Answerability appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the answerability evidence for route integrity checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-route-09","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["routes","integrity","navigation","crawlability","answerability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com',{redirect:'manual'}).then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:route check:9","humanCommand":"Verify redirects, canonical targets, and route accessibility consistency; review the answerability evidence dimension for Route Integrity Checks"}},{"id":"ni-route-10","testId":"ni-route-10","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Route Integrity Checks: Generative Context","description":"Validates GEO context quality for generative engines without inventing measured facts for route compliance, canonical pathways, and crawl-safe navigation integrity. Evidence should include entity, source, and instruction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Route Integrity Checks: Generative Context appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the generative context evidence for route integrity checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-route-10","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["routes","integrity","navigation","crawlability","generative-context","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com',{redirect:'manual'}).then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:route check:10","humanCommand":"Verify redirects, canonical targets, and route accessibility consistency; review the generative-context evidence dimension for Route Integrity Checks"}},{"id":"ni-route-11","testId":"ni-route-11","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Route Integrity Checks: Search Intent","description":"Validates search intent alignment and snippet-friendly content structure for route compliance, canonical pathways, and crawl-safe navigation integrity. Evidence should include metadata, headings, and topical text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Route Integrity Checks: Search Intent appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the search intent evidence for route integrity checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-route-11","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["routes","integrity","navigation","crawlability","search-intent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com',{redirect:'manual'}).then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:route check:11","humanCommand":"Verify redirects, canonical targets, and route accessibility consistency; review the search-intent evidence dimension for Route Integrity Checks"}},{"id":"ni-route-12","testId":"ni-route-12","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Route Integrity Checks: Accessibility Semantics","description":"Validates accessible names, relationships, landmarks, and keyboard-relevant structure for route compliance, canonical pathways, and crawl-safe navigation integrity. Evidence should include ARIA, labels, landmarks, and control evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Route Integrity Checks: Accessibility Semantics appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the accessibility semantics evidence for route integrity checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-route-12","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["routes","integrity","navigation","crawlability","accessibility-semantics","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com',{redirect:'manual'}).then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:route check:12","humanCommand":"Verify redirects, canonical targets, and route accessibility consistency; review the accessibility-semantics evidence dimension for Route Integrity Checks"}},{"id":"ni-route-13","testId":"ni-route-13","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Route Integrity Checks: Mobile Readiness","description":"Validates mobile viewport, responsive content, and touch-friendly layout signals for route compliance, canonical pathways, and crawl-safe navigation integrity. Evidence should include viewport and responsive asset evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Route Integrity Checks: Mobile Readiness appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the mobile readiness evidence for route integrity checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-route-13","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["routes","integrity","navigation","crawlability","mobile-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com',{redirect:'manual'}).then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:route check:13","humanCommand":"Verify redirects, canonical targets, and route accessibility consistency; review the mobile-readiness evidence dimension for Route Integrity Checks"}},{"id":"ni-route-14","testId":"ni-route-14","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Route Integrity Checks: Performance Budget","description":"Validates performance budget compliance using measured or bounded deterministic inputs for route compliance, canonical pathways, and crawl-safe navigation integrity. Evidence should include timing, byte, and Lighthouse-derived evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Route Integrity Checks: Performance Budget appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the performance budget evidence for route integrity checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-route-14","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["routes","integrity","navigation","crawlability","performance-budget","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com',{redirect:'manual'}).then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:route check:14","humanCommand":"Verify redirects, canonical targets, and route accessibility consistency; review the performance-budget evidence dimension for Route Integrity Checks"}},{"id":"ni-route-15","testId":"ni-route-15","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Route Integrity Checks: Resource Efficiency","description":"Validates resource size, script/style count, and optimization opportunity signals for route compliance, canonical pathways, and crawl-safe navigation integrity. Evidence should include resource and markup evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Route Integrity Checks: Resource Efficiency appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the resource efficiency evidence for route integrity checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-route-15","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["routes","integrity","navigation","crawlability","resource-efficiency","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com',{redirect:'manual'}).then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:route check:15","humanCommand":"Verify redirects, canonical targets, and route accessibility consistency; review the resource-efficiency evidence dimension for Route Integrity Checks"}},{"id":"ni-route-16","testId":"ni-route-16","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Route Integrity Checks: Cache Freshness","description":"Validates cache behavior, freshness hints, and stale-content risk for route compliance, canonical pathways, and crawl-safe navigation integrity. Evidence should include HTTP cache and timestamp evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Route Integrity Checks: Cache Freshness appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the cache freshness evidence for route integrity checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-route-16","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["routes","integrity","navigation","crawlability","cache-freshness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com',{redirect:'manual'}).then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:route check:16","humanCommand":"Verify redirects, canonical targets, and route accessibility consistency; review the cache-freshness evidence dimension for Route Integrity Checks"}},{"id":"ni-route-17","testId":"ni-route-17","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Route Integrity Checks: Route Reliability","description":"Validates route reliability, redirect safety, and dead-link risk for route compliance, canonical pathways, and crawl-safe navigation integrity. Evidence should include status, redirect, and sitemap evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Route Integrity Checks: Route Reliability appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the route reliability evidence for route integrity checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-route-17","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["routes","integrity","navigation","crawlability","route-reliability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com',{redirect:'manual'}).then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:route check:17","humanCommand":"Verify redirects, canonical targets, and route accessibility consistency; review the route-reliability evidence dimension for Route Integrity Checks"}},{"id":"ni-route-18","testId":"ni-route-18","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Route Integrity Checks: Feed Quality","description":"Validates RSS/Atom/feed usefulness, parseability, and freshness for route compliance, canonical pathways, and crawl-safe navigation integrity. Evidence should include feed XML and item evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Route Integrity Checks: Feed Quality appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the feed quality evidence for route integrity checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-route-18","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["routes","integrity","navigation","crawlability","feed-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com',{redirect:'manual'}).then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:route check:18","humanCommand":"Verify redirects, canonical targets, and route accessibility consistency; review the feed-quality evidence dimension for Route Integrity Checks"}},{"id":"ni-route-19","testId":"ni-route-19","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Route Integrity Checks: Sitemap Quality","description":"Validates sitemap validity, public-safe URL coverage, and no-dead-link policy for route compliance, canonical pathways, and crawl-safe navigation integrity. Evidence should include sitemap XML and bounded link-check evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Route Integrity Checks: Sitemap Quality appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the sitemap quality evidence for route integrity checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-route-19","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["routes","integrity","navigation","crawlability","sitemap-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com',{redirect:'manual'}).then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:route check:19","humanCommand":"Verify redirects, canonical targets, and route accessibility consistency; review the sitemap-quality evidence dimension for Route Integrity Checks"}},{"id":"ni-route-20","testId":"ni-route-20","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Route Integrity Checks: Robots Alignment","description":"Validates robots.txt alignment with public/protected policy and sitemap discovery for route compliance, canonical pathways, and crawl-safe navigation integrity. Evidence should include robots directives and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Route Integrity Checks: Robots Alignment appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the robots alignment evidence for route integrity checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-route-20","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["routes","integrity","navigation","crawlability","robots-alignment","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com',{redirect:'manual'}).then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:route check:20","humanCommand":"Verify redirects, canonical targets, and route accessibility consistency; review the robots-alignment evidence dimension for Route Integrity Checks"}},{"id":"ni-route-21","testId":"ni-route-21","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Route Integrity Checks: Llms Structure","description":"Validates llms.txt structure, readability, endpoint coverage, and agent usefulness for route compliance, canonical pathways, and crawl-safe navigation integrity. Evidence should include plain-text section and line-length evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Route Integrity Checks: Llms Structure appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms structure evidence for route integrity checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-route-21","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["routes","integrity","navigation","crawlability","llms-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com',{redirect:'manual'}).then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:route check:21","humanCommand":"Verify redirects, canonical targets, and route accessibility consistency; review the llms-structure evidence dimension for Route Integrity Checks"}},{"id":"ni-route-22","testId":"ni-route-22","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Route Integrity Checks: Llms Index Schema","description":"Validates llms-index JSON schema shape and count reconciliation for route compliance, canonical pathways, and crawl-safe navigation integrity. Evidence should include JSON keys, counts, and endpoint evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Route Integrity Checks: Llms Index Schema appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms index schema evidence for route integrity checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-route-22","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["routes","integrity","navigation","crawlability","llms-index-schema","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com',{redirect:'manual'}).then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:route check:22","humanCommand":"Verify redirects, canonical targets, and route accessibility consistency; review the llms-index-schema evidence dimension for Route Integrity Checks"}},{"id":"ni-route-23","testId":"ni-route-23","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Route Integrity Checks: Humans Attribution","description":"Validates humans.txt attribution, maintainer, technology, and governance transparency for route compliance, canonical pathways, and crawl-safe navigation integrity. Evidence should include humans.txt section evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Route Integrity Checks: Humans Attribution appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the humans attribution evidence for route integrity checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-route-23","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["routes","integrity","navigation","crawlability","humans-attribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com',{redirect:'manual'}).then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:route check:23","humanCommand":"Verify redirects, canonical targets, and route accessibility consistency; review the humans-attribution evidence dimension for Route Integrity Checks"}},{"id":"ni-route-24","testId":"ni-route-24","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Route Integrity Checks: Agent Policy","description":"Validates agent-policy JSON clarity for allowed, disallowed, and protected operations for route compliance, canonical pathways, and crawl-safe navigation integrity. Evidence should include well-known policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Route Integrity Checks: Agent Policy appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the agent policy evidence for route integrity checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-route-24","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["routes","integrity","navigation","crawlability","agent-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com',{redirect:'manual'}).then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:route check:24","humanCommand":"Verify redirects, canonical targets, and route accessibility consistency; review the agent-policy evidence dimension for Route Integrity Checks"}},{"id":"ni-route-25","testId":"ni-route-25","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Route Integrity Checks: Ai Policy","description":"Validates AI policy clarity for training, search, answer use, caching, and attribution for route compliance, canonical pathways, and crawl-safe navigation integrity. Evidence should include well-known AI policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Route Integrity Checks: Ai Policy appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ai policy evidence for route integrity checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-route-25","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["routes","integrity","navigation","crawlability","ai-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com',{redirect:'manual'}).then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:route check:25","humanCommand":"Verify redirects, canonical targets, and route accessibility consistency; review the ai-policy evidence dimension for Route Integrity Checks"}},{"id":"ni-route-26","testId":"ni-route-26","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Route Integrity Checks: Trust Policy","description":"Validates trust policy coverage for privacy, traceability, metadata, and protected actions for route compliance, canonical pathways, and crawl-safe navigation integrity. Evidence should include trust.json evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Route Integrity Checks: Trust Policy appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the trust policy evidence for route integrity checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-route-26","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["routes","integrity","navigation","crawlability","trust-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com',{redirect:'manual'}).then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:route check:26","humanCommand":"Verify redirects, canonical targets, and route accessibility consistency; review the trust-policy evidence dimension for Route Integrity Checks"}},{"id":"ni-route-27","testId":"ni-route-27","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Route Integrity Checks: Openapi Contract","description":"Validates OpenAPI availability, server URL accuracy, schemas, and auth policy for route compliance, canonical pathways, and crawl-safe navigation integrity. Evidence should include OpenAPI text/JSON evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Route Integrity Checks: Openapi Contract appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the openapi contract evidence for route integrity checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-route-27","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["routes","integrity","navigation","crawlability","openapi-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com',{redirect:'manual'}).then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:route check:27","humanCommand":"Verify redirects, canonical targets, and route accessibility consistency; review the openapi-contract evidence dimension for Route Integrity Checks"}},{"id":"ni-route-28","testId":"ni-route-28","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Route Integrity Checks: Mcp Contract","description":"Validates MCP JSON-RPC introspection, real tools, resources, and protected boundaries for route compliance, canonical pathways, and crawl-safe navigation integrity. Evidence should include MCP manifest and initialize evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Route Integrity Checks: Mcp Contract appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the mcp contract evidence for route integrity checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-route-28","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["routes","integrity","navigation","crawlability","mcp-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com',{redirect:'manual'}).then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:route check:28","humanCommand":"Verify redirects, canonical targets, and route accessibility consistency; review the mcp-contract evidence dimension for Route Integrity Checks"}},{"id":"ni-route-29","testId":"ni-route-29","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Route Integrity Checks: Api Error Shape","description":"Validates API success/error response shape consistency for route compliance, canonical pathways, and crawl-safe navigation integrity. Evidence should include REST envelope evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Route Integrity Checks: Api Error Shape appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the api error shape evidence for route integrity checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-route-29","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["routes","integrity","navigation","crawlability","api-error-shape","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com',{redirect:'manual'}).then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:route check:29","humanCommand":"Verify redirects, canonical targets, and route accessibility consistency; review the api-error-shape evidence dimension for Route Integrity Checks"}},{"id":"ni-route-30","testId":"ni-route-30","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Route Integrity Checks: Traceability","description":"Validates trace propagation, request IDs, and safe observability correlation for route compliance, canonical pathways, and crawl-safe navigation integrity. Evidence should include trace header and metadata evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Route Integrity Checks: Traceability appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the traceability evidence for route integrity checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-route-30","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["routes","integrity","navigation","crawlability","traceability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com',{redirect:'manual'}).then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:route check:30","humanCommand":"Verify redirects, canonical targets, and route accessibility consistency; review the traceability evidence dimension for Route Integrity Checks"}},{"id":"ni-route-31","testId":"ni-route-31","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Route Integrity Checks: Ja4 Redaction","description":"Validates fingerprint-adjacent metadata redaction and non-public raw JA4 handling for route compliance, canonical pathways, and crawl-safe navigation integrity. Evidence should include metadata policy and redaction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Route Integrity Checks: Ja4 Redaction appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the ja4 redaction evidence for route integrity checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-route-31","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["routes","integrity","navigation","crawlability","ja4-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com',{redirect:'manual'}).then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:route check:31","humanCommand":"Verify redirects, canonical targets, and route accessibility consistency; review the ja4-redaction evidence dimension for Route Integrity Checks"}},{"id":"ni-route-32","testId":"ni-route-32","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Route Integrity Checks: Secret Redaction","description":"Validates absence of secrets, generic key examples, cookies, and raw tokens in public outputs for route compliance, canonical pathways, and crawl-safe navigation integrity. Evidence should include public artifact scan evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Route Integrity Checks: Secret Redaction appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the secret redaction evidence for route integrity checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-route-32","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["routes","integrity","navigation","crawlability","secret-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com',{redirect:'manual'}).then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:route check:32","humanCommand":"Verify redirects, canonical targets, and route accessibility consistency; review the secret-redaction evidence dimension for Route Integrity Checks"}},{"id":"ni-route-33","testId":"ni-route-33","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Route Integrity Checks: Security Headers","description":"Validates security header coverage and hardened transport signals for route compliance, canonical pathways, and crawl-safe navigation integrity. Evidence should include HTTP header evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Route Integrity Checks: Security Headers appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the security headers evidence for route integrity checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-route-33","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["routes","integrity","navigation","crawlability","security-headers","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com',{redirect:'manual'}).then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:route check:33","humanCommand":"Verify redirects, canonical targets, and route accessibility consistency; review the security-headers evidence dimension for Route Integrity Checks"}},{"id":"ni-route-34","testId":"ni-route-34","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Route Integrity Checks: Privacy Consent","description":"Validates privacy policy, consent, attribution, and data-use disclosure quality for route compliance, canonical pathways, and crawl-safe navigation integrity. Evidence should include public page and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Route Integrity Checks: Privacy Consent appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the privacy consent evidence for route integrity checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-route-34","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["routes","integrity","navigation","crawlability","privacy-consent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com',{redirect:'manual'}).then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:route check:34","humanCommand":"Verify redirects, canonical targets, and route accessibility consistency; review the privacy-consent evidence dimension for Route Integrity Checks"}},{"id":"ni-route-35","testId":"ni-route-35","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Route Integrity Checks: Structured Data","description":"Validates JSON-LD and entity modeling for machine interpretation for route compliance, canonical pathways, and crawl-safe navigation integrity. Evidence should include schema block and parse evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Route Integrity Checks: Structured Data appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the structured data evidence for route integrity checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-route-35","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["routes","integrity","navigation","crawlability","structured-data","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com',{redirect:'manual'}).then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:route check:35","humanCommand":"Verify redirects, canonical targets, and route accessibility consistency; review the structured-data evidence dimension for Route Integrity Checks"}},{"id":"ni-route-36","testId":"ni-route-36","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Route Integrity Checks: Social Preview","description":"Validates Open Graph and Twitter/X card readiness for public sharing for route compliance, canonical pathways, and crawl-safe navigation integrity. Evidence should include meta tag evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Route Integrity Checks: Social Preview appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the social preview evidence for route integrity checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-route-36","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["routes","integrity","navigation","crawlability","social-preview","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com',{redirect:'manual'}).then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:route check:36","humanCommand":"Verify redirects, canonical targets, and route accessibility consistency; review the social-preview evidence dimension for Route Integrity Checks"}},{"id":"ni-route-37","testId":"ni-route-37","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Route Integrity Checks: I18n Routing","description":"Validates locale route, hreflang, language declaration, and translation readiness for route compliance, canonical pathways, and crawl-safe navigation integrity. Evidence should include lang/hreflang and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Route Integrity Checks: I18n Routing appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the i18n routing evidence for route integrity checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-route-37","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["routes","integrity","navigation","crawlability","i18n-routing","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com',{redirect:'manual'}).then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:route check:37","humanCommand":"Verify redirects, canonical targets, and route accessibility consistency; review the i18n-routing evidence dimension for Route Integrity Checks"}},{"id":"ni-route-38","testId":"ni-route-38","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Route Integrity Checks: Readability","description":"Validates human readability, sectioning, sentence complexity, and comprehension support for route compliance, canonical pathways, and crawl-safe navigation integrity. Evidence should include extracted content evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Route Integrity Checks: Readability appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the readability evidence for route integrity checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-route-38","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["routes","integrity","navigation","crawlability","readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com',{redirect:'manual'}).then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:route check:38","humanCommand":"Verify redirects, canonical targets, and route accessibility consistency; review the readability evidence dimension for Route Integrity Checks"}},{"id":"ni-route-39","testId":"ni-route-39","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Route Integrity Checks: Content Utility","description":"Validates non-placeholder content usefulness and domain-specific public value for route compliance, canonical pathways, and crawl-safe navigation integrity. Evidence should include content extraction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Route Integrity Checks: Content Utility appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the content utility evidence for route integrity checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-route-39","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["routes","integrity","navigation","crawlability","content-utility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com',{redirect:'manual'}).then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:route check:39","humanCommand":"Verify redirects, canonical targets, and route accessibility consistency; review the content-utility evidence dimension for Route Integrity Checks"}},{"id":"ni-route-40","testId":"ni-route-40","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Route Integrity Checks: Recommendation Grounding","description":"Validates recommendation grounding in deterministic evidence instead of fabricated model output for route compliance, canonical pathways, and crawl-safe navigation integrity. Evidence should include issue and remediation evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Route Integrity Checks: Recommendation Grounding appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the recommendation grounding evidence for route integrity checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-route-40","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["routes","integrity","navigation","crawlability","recommendation-grounding","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com',{redirect:'manual'}).then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:route check:40","humanCommand":"Verify redirects, canonical targets, and route accessibility consistency; review the recommendation-grounding evidence dimension for Route Integrity Checks"}},{"id":"ni-route-41","testId":"ni-route-41","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Route Integrity Checks: Evidence Quality","description":"Validates evidence completeness, public safety, and reproducibility for route compliance, canonical pathways, and crawl-safe navigation integrity. Evidence should include test output and artifact evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Route Integrity Checks: Evidence Quality appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the evidence quality evidence for route integrity checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-route-41","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["routes","integrity","navigation","crawlability","evidence-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com',{redirect:'manual'}).then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:route check:41","humanCommand":"Verify redirects, canonical targets, and route accessibility consistency; review the evidence-quality evidence dimension for Route Integrity Checks"}},{"id":"ni-route-42","testId":"ni-route-42","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Route Integrity Checks: Threshold Policy","description":"Validates threshold clarity, pass/warn/fail semantics, and scoring transparency for route compliance, canonical pathways, and crawl-safe navigation integrity. Evidence should include threshold and result status evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Route Integrity Checks: Threshold Policy appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the threshold policy evidence for route integrity checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-route-42","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["routes","integrity","navigation","crawlability","threshold-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com',{redirect:'manual'}).then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:route check:42","humanCommand":"Verify redirects, canonical targets, and route accessibility consistency; review the threshold-policy evidence dimension for Route Integrity Checks"}},{"id":"ni-route-43","testId":"ni-route-43","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Route Integrity Checks: Confidence","description":"Validates confidence scoring and degraded-input disclosure for route compliance, canonical pathways, and crawl-safe navigation integrity. Evidence should include source freshness and input availability evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Route Integrity Checks: Confidence appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the confidence evidence for route integrity checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-route-43","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["routes","integrity","navigation","crawlability","confidence","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com',{redirect:'manual'}).then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:route check:43","humanCommand":"Verify redirects, canonical targets, and route accessibility consistency; review the confidence evidence dimension for Route Integrity Checks"}},{"id":"ni-route-44","testId":"ni-route-44","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Route Integrity Checks: Trend Readiness","description":"Validates historical comparability and timeline readiness for future reruns for route compliance, canonical pathways, and crawl-safe navigation integrity. Evidence should include analysis ID, timestamp, and persistence evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Route Integrity Checks: Trend Readiness appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the trend readiness evidence for route integrity checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-route-44","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["routes","integrity","navigation","crawlability","trend-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com',{redirect:'manual'}).then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:route check:44","humanCommand":"Verify redirects, canonical targets, and route accessibility consistency; review the trend-readiness evidence dimension for Route Integrity Checks"}},{"id":"ni-route-45","testId":"ni-route-45","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Route Integrity Checks: Ranking Readiness","description":"Validates ranking input completeness and profile compatibility for route compliance, canonical pathways, and crawl-safe navigation integrity. Evidence should include score and profile evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Route Integrity Checks: Ranking Readiness appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ranking readiness evidence for route integrity checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-route-45","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["routes","integrity","navigation","crawlability","ranking-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com',{redirect:'manual'}).then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:route check:45","humanCommand":"Verify redirects, canonical targets, and route accessibility consistency; review the ranking-readiness evidence dimension for Route Integrity Checks"}},{"id":"ni-route-46","testId":"ni-route-46","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Route Integrity Checks: Network Contribution","description":"Validates PlatPhorm network contribution through discovery, integrations, and standards compliance for route compliance, canonical pathways, and crawl-safe navigation integrity. Evidence should include network graph and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Route Integrity Checks: Network Contribution appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the network contribution evidence for route integrity checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-route-46","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["routes","integrity","navigation","crawlability","network-contribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com',{redirect:'manual'}).then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:route check:46","humanCommand":"Verify redirects, canonical targets, and route accessibility consistency; review the network-contribution evidence dimension for Route Integrity Checks"}},{"id":"ni-route-47","testId":"ni-route-47","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Route Integrity Checks: Report Readiness","description":"Validates report/export categorization with public-safe evidence and protected boundaries for route compliance, canonical pathways, and crawl-safe navigation integrity. Evidence should include report section mapping evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Route Integrity Checks: Report Readiness appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the report readiness evidence for route integrity checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-route-47","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["routes","integrity","navigation","crawlability","report-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com',{redirect:'manual'}).then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:route check:47","humanCommand":"Verify redirects, canonical targets, and route accessibility consistency; review the report-readiness evidence dimension for Route Integrity Checks"}},{"id":"ni-route-48","testId":"ni-route-48","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Route Integrity Checks: Operator Actionability","description":"Validates clear remediation, owner action, difficulty, and retest path for route compliance, canonical pathways, and crawl-safe navigation integrity. Evidence should include fix instructions and command evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Route Integrity Checks: Operator Actionability appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the operator actionability evidence for route integrity checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-route-48","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["routes","integrity","navigation","crawlability","operator-actionability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com',{redirect:'manual'}).then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:route check:48","humanCommand":"Verify redirects, canonical targets, and route accessibility consistency; review the operator-actionability evidence dimension for Route Integrity Checks"}},{"id":"ni-route-49","testId":"ni-route-49","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Route Integrity Checks: Degraded State","description":"Validates honest degraded, unavailable, skipped, and not-applicable states for route compliance, canonical pathways, and crawl-safe navigation integrity. Evidence should include status and storage evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Route Integrity Checks: Degraded State appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the degraded state evidence for route integrity checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-route-49","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["routes","integrity","navigation","crawlability","degraded-state","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com',{redirect:'manual'}).then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:route check:49","humanCommand":"Verify redirects, canonical targets, and route accessibility consistency; review the degraded-state evidence dimension for Route Integrity Checks"}},{"id":"ni-route-50","testId":"ni-route-50","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Route Integrity Checks: Reproducibility","description":"Validates stable CLI/API/human reproduction path and deterministic rerun instructions for route compliance, canonical pathways, and crawl-safe navigation integrity. Evidence should include commands and registry version evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Route Integrity Checks: Reproducibility appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the reproducibility evidence for route integrity checks, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-route-50","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["routes","integrity","navigation","crawlability","reproducibility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com',{redirect:'manual'}).then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:route check:50","humanCommand":"Verify redirects, canonical targets, and route accessibility consistency; review the reproducibility evidence dimension for Route Integrity Checks"}},{"id":"ni-schema-01","testId":"ni-schema-01","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Structured Data Integrity: Availability","description":"Validates public route availability and successful bounded fetch behavior for schema quality, machine-readable entities, and structured evidence durability. Evidence should include HTTP status, timeout, and redirect evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Structured Data Integrity: Availability appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the availability evidence for structured data integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-schema-01","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["structured-data","schema","entities","ai-readiness","availability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log((html.match(/application\\/ld\\+json/g)||[]).length))\" # group:schema check:1","humanCommand":"Validate JSON-LD entities and references with schema.org vocabulary; review the availability evidence dimension for Structured Data Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-schema-02","testId":"ni-schema-02","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Structured Data Integrity: Public Safety","description":"Validates public-safe access boundaries without exposing private or protected data for schema quality, machine-readable entities, and structured evidence durability. Evidence should include route policy and response-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Structured Data Integrity: Public Safety appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the public safety evidence for structured data integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-schema-02","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["structured-data","schema","entities","ai-readiness","public-safety","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log((html.match(/application\\/ld\\+json/g)||[]).length))\" # group:schema check:2","humanCommand":"Validate JSON-LD entities and references with schema.org vocabulary; review the public-safety evidence dimension for Structured Data Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-schema-03","testId":"ni-schema-03","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Structured Data Integrity: Canonical Url","description":"Validates canonical URL stability and normalized route identity for schema quality, machine-readable entities, and structured evidence durability. Evidence should include canonical tags, redirects, and normalized URL evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Structured Data Integrity: Canonical Url appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the canonical url evidence for structured data integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-schema-03","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["structured-data","schema","entities","ai-readiness","canonical-url","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log((html.match(/application\\/ld\\+json/g)||[]).length))\" # group:schema check:3","humanCommand":"Validate JSON-LD entities and references with schema.org vocabulary; review the canonical-url evidence dimension for Structured Data Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-schema-04","testId":"ni-schema-04","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Structured Data Integrity: Metadata Clarity","description":"Validates title, description, and page-specific metadata clarity for schema quality, machine-readable entities, and structured evidence durability. Evidence should include HTML metadata and extracted text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Structured Data Integrity: Metadata Clarity appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the metadata clarity evidence for structured data integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-schema-04","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["structured-data","schema","entities","ai-readiness","metadata-clarity","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log((html.match(/application\\/ld\\+json/g)||[]).length))\" # group:schema check:4","humanCommand":"Validate JSON-LD entities and references with schema.org vocabulary; review the metadata-clarity evidence dimension for Structured Data Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-schema-05","testId":"ni-schema-05","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Structured Data Integrity: Semantic Structure","description":"Validates semantic HTML structure for humans, agents, and assistive technology for schema quality, machine-readable entities, and structured evidence durability. Evidence should include heading, landmark, and element evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Structured Data Integrity: Semantic Structure appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the semantic structure evidence for structured data integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-schema-05","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["structured-data","schema","entities","ai-readiness","semantic-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log((html.match(/application\\/ld\\+json/g)||[]).length))\" # group:schema check:5","humanCommand":"Validate JSON-LD entities and references with schema.org vocabulary; review the semantic-structure evidence dimension for Structured Data Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-schema-06","testId":"ni-schema-06","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Structured Data Integrity: Machine Readability","description":"Validates machine-readable public content and predictable parsing surfaces for schema quality, machine-readable entities, and structured evidence durability. Evidence should include structured tags, JSON-LD, and document-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Structured Data Integrity: Machine Readability appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the machine readability evidence for structured data integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-schema-06","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["structured-data","schema","entities","ai-readiness","machine-readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log((html.match(/application\\/ld\\+json/g)||[]).length))\" # group:schema check:6","humanCommand":"Validate JSON-LD entities and references with schema.org vocabulary; review the machine-readability evidence dimension for Structured Data Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-schema-07","testId":"ni-schema-07","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Structured Data Integrity: Agent Discovery","description":"Validates agent discovery hints and AI-readable policy/documentation signals for schema quality, machine-readable entities, and structured evidence durability. Evidence should include llms, policy, MCP, OpenAPI, or schema evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Structured Data Integrity: Agent Discovery appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the agent discovery evidence for structured data integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-schema-07","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["structured-data","schema","entities","ai-readiness","agent-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log((html.match(/application\\/ld\\+json/g)||[]).length))\" # group:schema check:7","humanCommand":"Validate JSON-LD entities and references with schema.org vocabulary; review the agent-discovery evidence dimension for Structured Data Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-schema-08","testId":"ni-schema-08","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Structured Data Integrity: Crawler Discovery","description":"Validates crawler discovery paths through robots, sitemap, feeds, and canonical links for schema quality, machine-readable entities, and structured evidence durability. Evidence should include discovery artifact and link evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Structured Data Integrity: Crawler Discovery appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the crawler discovery evidence for structured data integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-schema-08","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["structured-data","schema","entities","ai-readiness","crawler-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log((html.match(/application\\/ld\\+json/g)||[]).length))\" # group:schema check:8","humanCommand":"Validate JSON-LD entities and references with schema.org vocabulary; review the crawler-discovery evidence dimension for Structured Data Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-schema-09","testId":"ni-schema-09","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Structured Data Integrity: Answerability","description":"Validates direct answer extraction and quotable explanatory content for schema quality, machine-readable entities, and structured evidence durability. Evidence should include question, summary, heading, and paragraph evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Structured Data Integrity: Answerability appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the answerability evidence for structured data integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-schema-09","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["structured-data","schema","entities","ai-readiness","answerability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log((html.match(/application\\/ld\\+json/g)||[]).length))\" # group:schema check:9","humanCommand":"Validate JSON-LD entities and references with schema.org vocabulary; review the answerability evidence dimension for Structured Data Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-schema-10","testId":"ni-schema-10","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Structured Data Integrity: Generative Context","description":"Validates GEO context quality for generative engines without inventing measured facts for schema quality, machine-readable entities, and structured evidence durability. Evidence should include entity, source, and instruction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Structured Data Integrity: Generative Context appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the generative context evidence for structured data integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-schema-10","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["structured-data","schema","entities","ai-readiness","generative-context","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log((html.match(/application\\/ld\\+json/g)||[]).length))\" # group:schema check:10","humanCommand":"Validate JSON-LD entities and references with schema.org vocabulary; review the generative-context evidence dimension for Structured Data Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-schema-11","testId":"ni-schema-11","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Structured Data Integrity: Search Intent","description":"Validates search intent alignment and snippet-friendly content structure for schema quality, machine-readable entities, and structured evidence durability. Evidence should include metadata, headings, and topical text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Structured Data Integrity: Search Intent appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the search intent evidence for structured data integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-schema-11","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["structured-data","schema","entities","ai-readiness","search-intent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log((html.match(/application\\/ld\\+json/g)||[]).length))\" # group:schema check:11","humanCommand":"Validate JSON-LD entities and references with schema.org vocabulary; review the search-intent evidence dimension for Structured Data Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-schema-12","testId":"ni-schema-12","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Structured Data Integrity: Accessibility Semantics","description":"Validates accessible names, relationships, landmarks, and keyboard-relevant structure for schema quality, machine-readable entities, and structured evidence durability. Evidence should include ARIA, labels, landmarks, and control evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Structured Data Integrity: Accessibility Semantics appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the accessibility semantics evidence for structured data integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-schema-12","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["structured-data","schema","entities","ai-readiness","accessibility-semantics","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log((html.match(/application\\/ld\\+json/g)||[]).length))\" # group:schema check:12","humanCommand":"Validate JSON-LD entities and references with schema.org vocabulary; review the accessibility-semantics evidence dimension for Structured Data Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-schema-13","testId":"ni-schema-13","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Structured Data Integrity: Mobile Readiness","description":"Validates mobile viewport, responsive content, and touch-friendly layout signals for schema quality, machine-readable entities, and structured evidence durability. Evidence should include viewport and responsive asset evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Structured Data Integrity: Mobile Readiness appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the mobile readiness evidence for structured data integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-schema-13","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["structured-data","schema","entities","ai-readiness","mobile-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log((html.match(/application\\/ld\\+json/g)||[]).length))\" # group:schema check:13","humanCommand":"Validate JSON-LD entities and references with schema.org vocabulary; review the mobile-readiness evidence dimension for Structured Data Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-schema-14","testId":"ni-schema-14","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Structured Data Integrity: Performance Budget","description":"Validates performance budget compliance using measured or bounded deterministic inputs for schema quality, machine-readable entities, and structured evidence durability. Evidence should include timing, byte, and Lighthouse-derived evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Structured Data Integrity: Performance Budget appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the performance budget evidence for structured data integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-schema-14","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["structured-data","schema","entities","ai-readiness","performance-budget","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log((html.match(/application\\/ld\\+json/g)||[]).length))\" # group:schema check:14","humanCommand":"Validate JSON-LD entities and references with schema.org vocabulary; review the performance-budget evidence dimension for Structured Data Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-schema-15","testId":"ni-schema-15","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Structured Data Integrity: Resource Efficiency","description":"Validates resource size, script/style count, and optimization opportunity signals for schema quality, machine-readable entities, and structured evidence durability. Evidence should include resource and markup evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Structured Data Integrity: Resource Efficiency appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the resource efficiency evidence for structured data integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-schema-15","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["structured-data","schema","entities","ai-readiness","resource-efficiency","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log((html.match(/application\\/ld\\+json/g)||[]).length))\" # group:schema check:15","humanCommand":"Validate JSON-LD entities and references with schema.org vocabulary; review the resource-efficiency evidence dimension for Structured Data Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-schema-16","testId":"ni-schema-16","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Structured Data Integrity: Cache Freshness","description":"Validates cache behavior, freshness hints, and stale-content risk for schema quality, machine-readable entities, and structured evidence durability. Evidence should include HTTP cache and timestamp evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Structured Data Integrity: Cache Freshness appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the cache freshness evidence for structured data integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-schema-16","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["structured-data","schema","entities","ai-readiness","cache-freshness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log((html.match(/application\\/ld\\+json/g)||[]).length))\" # group:schema check:16","humanCommand":"Validate JSON-LD entities and references with schema.org vocabulary; review the cache-freshness evidence dimension for Structured Data Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-schema-17","testId":"ni-schema-17","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Structured Data Integrity: Route Reliability","description":"Validates route reliability, redirect safety, and dead-link risk for schema quality, machine-readable entities, and structured evidence durability. Evidence should include status, redirect, and sitemap evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Structured Data Integrity: Route Reliability appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the route reliability evidence for structured data integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-schema-17","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["structured-data","schema","entities","ai-readiness","route-reliability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log((html.match(/application\\/ld\\+json/g)||[]).length))\" # group:schema check:17","humanCommand":"Validate JSON-LD entities and references with schema.org vocabulary; review the route-reliability evidence dimension for Structured Data Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-schema-18","testId":"ni-schema-18","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Structured Data Integrity: Feed Quality","description":"Validates RSS/Atom/feed usefulness, parseability, and freshness for schema quality, machine-readable entities, and structured evidence durability. Evidence should include feed XML and item evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Structured Data Integrity: Feed Quality appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the feed quality evidence for structured data integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-schema-18","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["structured-data","schema","entities","ai-readiness","feed-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log((html.match(/application\\/ld\\+json/g)||[]).length))\" # group:schema check:18","humanCommand":"Validate JSON-LD entities and references with schema.org vocabulary; review the feed-quality evidence dimension for Structured Data Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-schema-19","testId":"ni-schema-19","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Structured Data Integrity: Sitemap Quality","description":"Validates sitemap validity, public-safe URL coverage, and no-dead-link policy for schema quality, machine-readable entities, and structured evidence durability. Evidence should include sitemap XML and bounded link-check evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Structured Data Integrity: Sitemap Quality appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the sitemap quality evidence for structured data integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-schema-19","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["structured-data","schema","entities","ai-readiness","sitemap-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log((html.match(/application\\/ld\\+json/g)||[]).length))\" # group:schema check:19","humanCommand":"Validate JSON-LD entities and references with schema.org vocabulary; review the sitemap-quality evidence dimension for Structured Data Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-schema-20","testId":"ni-schema-20","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Structured Data Integrity: Robots Alignment","description":"Validates robots.txt alignment with public/protected policy and sitemap discovery for schema quality, machine-readable entities, and structured evidence durability. Evidence should include robots directives and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Structured Data Integrity: Robots Alignment appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the robots alignment evidence for structured data integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-schema-20","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["structured-data","schema","entities","ai-readiness","robots-alignment","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log((html.match(/application\\/ld\\+json/g)||[]).length))\" # group:schema check:20","humanCommand":"Validate JSON-LD entities and references with schema.org vocabulary; review the robots-alignment evidence dimension for Structured Data Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-schema-21","testId":"ni-schema-21","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Structured Data Integrity: Llms Structure","description":"Validates llms.txt structure, readability, endpoint coverage, and agent usefulness for schema quality, machine-readable entities, and structured evidence durability. Evidence should include plain-text section and line-length evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Structured Data Integrity: Llms Structure appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms structure evidence for structured data integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-schema-21","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["structured-data","schema","entities","ai-readiness","llms-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log((html.match(/application\\/ld\\+json/g)||[]).length))\" # group:schema check:21","humanCommand":"Validate JSON-LD entities and references with schema.org vocabulary; review the llms-structure evidence dimension for Structured Data Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-schema-22","testId":"ni-schema-22","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Structured Data Integrity: Llms Index Schema","description":"Validates llms-index JSON schema shape and count reconciliation for schema quality, machine-readable entities, and structured evidence durability. Evidence should include JSON keys, counts, and endpoint evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Structured Data Integrity: Llms Index Schema appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms index schema evidence for structured data integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-schema-22","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["structured-data","schema","entities","ai-readiness","llms-index-schema","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log((html.match(/application\\/ld\\+json/g)||[]).length))\" # group:schema check:22","humanCommand":"Validate JSON-LD entities and references with schema.org vocabulary; review the llms-index-schema evidence dimension for Structured Data Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-schema-23","testId":"ni-schema-23","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Structured Data Integrity: Humans Attribution","description":"Validates humans.txt attribution, maintainer, technology, and governance transparency for schema quality, machine-readable entities, and structured evidence durability. Evidence should include humans.txt section evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Structured Data Integrity: Humans Attribution appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the humans attribution evidence for structured data integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-schema-23","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["structured-data","schema","entities","ai-readiness","humans-attribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log((html.match(/application\\/ld\\+json/g)||[]).length))\" # group:schema check:23","humanCommand":"Validate JSON-LD entities and references with schema.org vocabulary; review the humans-attribution evidence dimension for Structured Data Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-schema-24","testId":"ni-schema-24","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Structured Data Integrity: Agent Policy","description":"Validates agent-policy JSON clarity for allowed, disallowed, and protected operations for schema quality, machine-readable entities, and structured evidence durability. Evidence should include well-known policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Structured Data Integrity: Agent Policy appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the agent policy evidence for structured data integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-schema-24","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["structured-data","schema","entities","ai-readiness","agent-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log((html.match(/application\\/ld\\+json/g)||[]).length))\" # group:schema check:24","humanCommand":"Validate JSON-LD entities and references with schema.org vocabulary; review the agent-policy evidence dimension for Structured Data Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-schema-25","testId":"ni-schema-25","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Structured Data Integrity: Ai Policy","description":"Validates AI policy clarity for training, search, answer use, caching, and attribution for schema quality, machine-readable entities, and structured evidence durability. Evidence should include well-known AI policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Structured Data Integrity: Ai Policy appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ai policy evidence for structured data integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-schema-25","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["structured-data","schema","entities","ai-readiness","ai-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log((html.match(/application\\/ld\\+json/g)||[]).length))\" # group:schema check:25","humanCommand":"Validate JSON-LD entities and references with schema.org vocabulary; review the ai-policy evidence dimension for Structured Data Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-schema-26","testId":"ni-schema-26","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Structured Data Integrity: Trust Policy","description":"Validates trust policy coverage for privacy, traceability, metadata, and protected actions for schema quality, machine-readable entities, and structured evidence durability. Evidence should include trust.json evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Structured Data Integrity: Trust Policy appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the trust policy evidence for structured data integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-schema-26","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["structured-data","schema","entities","ai-readiness","trust-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log((html.match(/application\\/ld\\+json/g)||[]).length))\" # group:schema check:26","humanCommand":"Validate JSON-LD entities and references with schema.org vocabulary; review the trust-policy evidence dimension for Structured Data Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-schema-27","testId":"ni-schema-27","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Structured Data Integrity: Openapi Contract","description":"Validates OpenAPI availability, server URL accuracy, schemas, and auth policy for schema quality, machine-readable entities, and structured evidence durability. Evidence should include OpenAPI text/JSON evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Structured Data Integrity: Openapi Contract appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the openapi contract evidence for structured data integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-schema-27","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["structured-data","schema","entities","ai-readiness","openapi-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log((html.match(/application\\/ld\\+json/g)||[]).length))\" # group:schema check:27","humanCommand":"Validate JSON-LD entities and references with schema.org vocabulary; review the openapi-contract evidence dimension for Structured Data Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-schema-28","testId":"ni-schema-28","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Structured Data Integrity: Mcp Contract","description":"Validates MCP JSON-RPC introspection, real tools, resources, and protected boundaries for schema quality, machine-readable entities, and structured evidence durability. Evidence should include MCP manifest and initialize evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Structured Data Integrity: Mcp Contract appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the mcp contract evidence for structured data integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-schema-28","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["structured-data","schema","entities","ai-readiness","mcp-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log((html.match(/application\\/ld\\+json/g)||[]).length))\" # group:schema check:28","humanCommand":"Validate JSON-LD entities and references with schema.org vocabulary; review the mcp-contract evidence dimension for Structured Data Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-schema-29","testId":"ni-schema-29","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Structured Data Integrity: Api Error Shape","description":"Validates API success/error response shape consistency for schema quality, machine-readable entities, and structured evidence durability. Evidence should include REST envelope evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Structured Data Integrity: Api Error Shape appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the api error shape evidence for structured data integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-schema-29","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["structured-data","schema","entities","ai-readiness","api-error-shape","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log((html.match(/application\\/ld\\+json/g)||[]).length))\" # group:schema check:29","humanCommand":"Validate JSON-LD entities and references with schema.org vocabulary; review the api-error-shape evidence dimension for Structured Data Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-schema-30","testId":"ni-schema-30","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Structured Data Integrity: Traceability","description":"Validates trace propagation, request IDs, and safe observability correlation for schema quality, machine-readable entities, and structured evidence durability. Evidence should include trace header and metadata evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Structured Data Integrity: Traceability appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the traceability evidence for structured data integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-schema-30","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["structured-data","schema","entities","ai-readiness","traceability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log((html.match(/application\\/ld\\+json/g)||[]).length))\" # group:schema check:30","humanCommand":"Validate JSON-LD entities and references with schema.org vocabulary; review the traceability evidence dimension for Structured Data Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-schema-31","testId":"ni-schema-31","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Structured Data Integrity: Ja4 Redaction","description":"Validates fingerprint-adjacent metadata redaction and non-public raw JA4 handling for schema quality, machine-readable entities, and structured evidence durability. Evidence should include metadata policy and redaction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Structured Data Integrity: Ja4 Redaction appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the ja4 redaction evidence for structured data integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-schema-31","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["structured-data","schema","entities","ai-readiness","ja4-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log((html.match(/application\\/ld\\+json/g)||[]).length))\" # group:schema check:31","humanCommand":"Validate JSON-LD entities and references with schema.org vocabulary; review the ja4-redaction evidence dimension for Structured Data Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-schema-32","testId":"ni-schema-32","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Structured Data Integrity: Secret Redaction","description":"Validates absence of secrets, generic key examples, cookies, and raw tokens in public outputs for schema quality, machine-readable entities, and structured evidence durability. Evidence should include public artifact scan evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Structured Data Integrity: Secret Redaction appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the secret redaction evidence for structured data integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-schema-32","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["structured-data","schema","entities","ai-readiness","secret-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log((html.match(/application\\/ld\\+json/g)||[]).length))\" # group:schema check:32","humanCommand":"Validate JSON-LD entities and references with schema.org vocabulary; review the secret-redaction evidence dimension for Structured Data Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-schema-33","testId":"ni-schema-33","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Structured Data Integrity: Security Headers","description":"Validates security header coverage and hardened transport signals for schema quality, machine-readable entities, and structured evidence durability. Evidence should include HTTP header evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Structured Data Integrity: Security Headers appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the security headers evidence for structured data integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-schema-33","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["structured-data","schema","entities","ai-readiness","security-headers","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log((html.match(/application\\/ld\\+json/g)||[]).length))\" # group:schema check:33","humanCommand":"Validate JSON-LD entities and references with schema.org vocabulary; review the security-headers evidence dimension for Structured Data Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-schema-34","testId":"ni-schema-34","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Structured Data Integrity: Privacy Consent","description":"Validates privacy policy, consent, attribution, and data-use disclosure quality for schema quality, machine-readable entities, and structured evidence durability. Evidence should include public page and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Structured Data Integrity: Privacy Consent appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the privacy consent evidence for structured data integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-schema-34","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["structured-data","schema","entities","ai-readiness","privacy-consent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log((html.match(/application\\/ld\\+json/g)||[]).length))\" # group:schema check:34","humanCommand":"Validate JSON-LD entities and references with schema.org vocabulary; review the privacy-consent evidence dimension for Structured Data Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-schema-35","testId":"ni-schema-35","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Structured Data Integrity: Structured Data","description":"Validates JSON-LD and entity modeling for machine interpretation for schema quality, machine-readable entities, and structured evidence durability. Evidence should include schema block and parse evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Structured Data Integrity: Structured Data appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the structured data evidence for structured data integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-schema-35","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["structured-data","schema","entities","ai-readiness","structured-data","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log((html.match(/application\\/ld\\+json/g)||[]).length))\" # group:schema check:35","humanCommand":"Validate JSON-LD entities and references with schema.org vocabulary; review the structured-data evidence dimension for Structured Data Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-schema-36","testId":"ni-schema-36","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Structured Data Integrity: Social Preview","description":"Validates Open Graph and Twitter/X card readiness for public sharing for schema quality, machine-readable entities, and structured evidence durability. Evidence should include meta tag evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Structured Data Integrity: Social Preview appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the social preview evidence for structured data integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-schema-36","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["structured-data","schema","entities","ai-readiness","social-preview","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log((html.match(/application\\/ld\\+json/g)||[]).length))\" # group:schema check:36","humanCommand":"Validate JSON-LD entities and references with schema.org vocabulary; review the social-preview evidence dimension for Structured Data Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-schema-37","testId":"ni-schema-37","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Structured Data Integrity: I18n Routing","description":"Validates locale route, hreflang, language declaration, and translation readiness for schema quality, machine-readable entities, and structured evidence durability. Evidence should include lang/hreflang and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Structured Data Integrity: I18n Routing appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the i18n routing evidence for structured data integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-schema-37","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["structured-data","schema","entities","ai-readiness","i18n-routing","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log((html.match(/application\\/ld\\+json/g)||[]).length))\" # group:schema check:37","humanCommand":"Validate JSON-LD entities and references with schema.org vocabulary; review the i18n-routing evidence dimension for Structured Data Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-schema-38","testId":"ni-schema-38","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Structured Data Integrity: Readability","description":"Validates human readability, sectioning, sentence complexity, and comprehension support for schema quality, machine-readable entities, and structured evidence durability. Evidence should include extracted content evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Structured Data Integrity: Readability appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the readability evidence for structured data integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-schema-38","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["structured-data","schema","entities","ai-readiness","readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log((html.match(/application\\/ld\\+json/g)||[]).length))\" # group:schema check:38","humanCommand":"Validate JSON-LD entities and references with schema.org vocabulary; review the readability evidence dimension for Structured Data Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-schema-39","testId":"ni-schema-39","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Structured Data Integrity: Content Utility","description":"Validates non-placeholder content usefulness and domain-specific public value for schema quality, machine-readable entities, and structured evidence durability. Evidence should include content extraction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Structured Data Integrity: Content Utility appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the content utility evidence for structured data integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-schema-39","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["structured-data","schema","entities","ai-readiness","content-utility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log((html.match(/application\\/ld\\+json/g)||[]).length))\" # group:schema check:39","humanCommand":"Validate JSON-LD entities and references with schema.org vocabulary; review the content-utility evidence dimension for Structured Data Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-schema-40","testId":"ni-schema-40","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Structured Data Integrity: Recommendation Grounding","description":"Validates recommendation grounding in deterministic evidence instead of fabricated model output for schema quality, machine-readable entities, and structured evidence durability. Evidence should include issue and remediation evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Structured Data Integrity: Recommendation Grounding appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the recommendation grounding evidence for structured data integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-schema-40","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["structured-data","schema","entities","ai-readiness","recommendation-grounding","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log((html.match(/application\\/ld\\+json/g)||[]).length))\" # group:schema check:40","humanCommand":"Validate JSON-LD entities and references with schema.org vocabulary; review the recommendation-grounding evidence dimension for Structured Data Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-schema-41","testId":"ni-schema-41","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Structured Data Integrity: Evidence Quality","description":"Validates evidence completeness, public safety, and reproducibility for schema quality, machine-readable entities, and structured evidence durability. Evidence should include test output and artifact evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Structured Data Integrity: Evidence Quality appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the evidence quality evidence for structured data integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-schema-41","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["structured-data","schema","entities","ai-readiness","evidence-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log((html.match(/application\\/ld\\+json/g)||[]).length))\" # group:schema check:41","humanCommand":"Validate JSON-LD entities and references with schema.org vocabulary; review the evidence-quality evidence dimension for Structured Data Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-schema-42","testId":"ni-schema-42","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Structured Data Integrity: Threshold Policy","description":"Validates threshold clarity, pass/warn/fail semantics, and scoring transparency for schema quality, machine-readable entities, and structured evidence durability. Evidence should include threshold and result status evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Structured Data Integrity: Threshold Policy appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the threshold policy evidence for structured data integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-schema-42","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["structured-data","schema","entities","ai-readiness","threshold-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log((html.match(/application\\/ld\\+json/g)||[]).length))\" # group:schema check:42","humanCommand":"Validate JSON-LD entities and references with schema.org vocabulary; review the threshold-policy evidence dimension for Structured Data Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-schema-43","testId":"ni-schema-43","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Structured Data Integrity: Confidence","description":"Validates confidence scoring and degraded-input disclosure for schema quality, machine-readable entities, and structured evidence durability. Evidence should include source freshness and input availability evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Structured Data Integrity: Confidence appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the confidence evidence for structured data integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-schema-43","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["structured-data","schema","entities","ai-readiness","confidence","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log((html.match(/application\\/ld\\+json/g)||[]).length))\" # group:schema check:43","humanCommand":"Validate JSON-LD entities and references with schema.org vocabulary; review the confidence evidence dimension for Structured Data Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-schema-44","testId":"ni-schema-44","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Structured Data Integrity: Trend Readiness","description":"Validates historical comparability and timeline readiness for future reruns for schema quality, machine-readable entities, and structured evidence durability. Evidence should include analysis ID, timestamp, and persistence evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Structured Data Integrity: Trend Readiness appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the trend readiness evidence for structured data integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-schema-44","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["structured-data","schema","entities","ai-readiness","trend-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log((html.match(/application\\/ld\\+json/g)||[]).length))\" # group:schema check:44","humanCommand":"Validate JSON-LD entities and references with schema.org vocabulary; review the trend-readiness evidence dimension for Structured Data Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-schema-45","testId":"ni-schema-45","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Structured Data Integrity: Ranking Readiness","description":"Validates ranking input completeness and profile compatibility for schema quality, machine-readable entities, and structured evidence durability. Evidence should include score and profile evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Structured Data Integrity: Ranking Readiness appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ranking readiness evidence for structured data integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-schema-45","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["structured-data","schema","entities","ai-readiness","ranking-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log((html.match(/application\\/ld\\+json/g)||[]).length))\" # group:schema check:45","humanCommand":"Validate JSON-LD entities and references with schema.org vocabulary; review the ranking-readiness evidence dimension for Structured Data Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-schema-46","testId":"ni-schema-46","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Structured Data Integrity: Network Contribution","description":"Validates PlatPhorm network contribution through discovery, integrations, and standards compliance for schema quality, machine-readable entities, and structured evidence durability. Evidence should include network graph and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Structured Data Integrity: Network Contribution appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the network contribution evidence for structured data integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-schema-46","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["structured-data","schema","entities","ai-readiness","network-contribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log((html.match(/application\\/ld\\+json/g)||[]).length))\" # group:schema check:46","humanCommand":"Validate JSON-LD entities and references with schema.org vocabulary; review the network-contribution evidence dimension for Structured Data Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-schema-47","testId":"ni-schema-47","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Structured Data Integrity: Report Readiness","description":"Validates report/export categorization with public-safe evidence and protected boundaries for schema quality, machine-readable entities, and structured evidence durability. Evidence should include report section mapping evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Structured Data Integrity: Report Readiness appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the report readiness evidence for structured data integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-schema-47","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["structured-data","schema","entities","ai-readiness","report-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log((html.match(/application\\/ld\\+json/g)||[]).length))\" # group:schema check:47","humanCommand":"Validate JSON-LD entities and references with schema.org vocabulary; review the report-readiness evidence dimension for Structured Data Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-schema-48","testId":"ni-schema-48","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Structured Data Integrity: Operator Actionability","description":"Validates clear remediation, owner action, difficulty, and retest path for schema quality, machine-readable entities, and structured evidence durability. Evidence should include fix instructions and command evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Structured Data Integrity: Operator Actionability appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the operator actionability evidence for structured data integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-schema-48","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["structured-data","schema","entities","ai-readiness","operator-actionability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log((html.match(/application\\/ld\\+json/g)||[]).length))\" # group:schema check:48","humanCommand":"Validate JSON-LD entities and references with schema.org vocabulary; review the operator-actionability evidence dimension for Structured Data Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-schema-49","testId":"ni-schema-49","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Structured Data Integrity: Degraded State","description":"Validates honest degraded, unavailable, skipped, and not-applicable states for schema quality, machine-readable entities, and structured evidence durability. Evidence should include status and storage evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Structured Data Integrity: Degraded State appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the degraded state evidence for structured data integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-schema-49","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["structured-data","schema","entities","ai-readiness","degraded-state","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log((html.match(/application\\/ld\\+json/g)||[]).length))\" # group:schema check:49","humanCommand":"Validate JSON-LD entities and references with schema.org vocabulary; review the degraded-state evidence dimension for Structured Data Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-schema-50","testId":"ni-schema-50","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Structured Data Integrity: Reproducibility","description":"Validates stable CLI/API/human reproduction path and deterministic rerun instructions for schema quality, machine-readable entities, and structured evidence durability. Evidence should include commands and registry version evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Structured Data Integrity: Reproducibility appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the reproducibility evidence for structured data integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-schema-50","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["structured-data","schema","entities","ai-readiness","reproducibility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>r.text()).then(html=>console.log((html.match(/application\\/ld\\+json/g)||[]).length))\" # group:schema check:50","humanCommand":"Validate JSON-LD entities and references with schema.org vocabulary; review the reproducibility evidence dimension for Structured Data Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-security-01","testId":"ni-security-01","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Security Signal Integrity: Availability","description":"Validates public route availability and successful bounded fetch behavior for security posture visibility, policy checks, and hardened transport behavior. Evidence should include HTTP status, timeout, and redirect evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Security Signal Integrity: Availability appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with measured evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the availability evidence for security signal integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-security-01","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["security","headers","transport","integrity","availability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(Boolean(r.headers.get('strict-transport-security')||r.headers.get('content-security-policy'))))\" # group:security check:1","humanCommand":"Review critical headers and transport policy hardening against OWASP guidance; review the availability evidence dimension for Security Signal Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-security-02","testId":"ni-security-02","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Security Signal Integrity: Public Safety","description":"Validates public-safe access boundaries without exposing private or protected data for security posture visibility, policy checks, and hardened transport behavior. Evidence should include route policy and response-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Security Signal Integrity: Public Safety appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with measured evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the public safety evidence for security signal integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-security-02","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["security","headers","transport","integrity","public-safety","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(Boolean(r.headers.get('strict-transport-security')||r.headers.get('content-security-policy'))))\" # group:security check:2","humanCommand":"Review critical headers and transport policy hardening against OWASP guidance; review the public-safety evidence dimension for Security Signal Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-security-03","testId":"ni-security-03","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Security Signal Integrity: Canonical Url","description":"Validates canonical URL stability and normalized route identity for security posture visibility, policy checks, and hardened transport behavior. Evidence should include canonical tags, redirects, and normalized URL evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Security Signal Integrity: Canonical Url appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with measured evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the canonical url evidence for security signal integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-security-03","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["security","headers","transport","integrity","canonical-url","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(Boolean(r.headers.get('strict-transport-security')||r.headers.get('content-security-policy'))))\" # group:security check:3","humanCommand":"Review critical headers and transport policy hardening against OWASP guidance; review the canonical-url evidence dimension for Security Signal Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-security-04","testId":"ni-security-04","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Security Signal Integrity: Metadata Clarity","description":"Validates title, description, and page-specific metadata clarity for security posture visibility, policy checks, and hardened transport behavior. Evidence should include HTML metadata and extracted text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Security Signal Integrity: Metadata Clarity appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with measured evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the metadata clarity evidence for security signal integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-security-04","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["security","headers","transport","integrity","metadata-clarity","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(Boolean(r.headers.get('strict-transport-security')||r.headers.get('content-security-policy'))))\" # group:security check:4","humanCommand":"Review critical headers and transport policy hardening against OWASP guidance; review the metadata-clarity evidence dimension for Security Signal Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-security-05","testId":"ni-security-05","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Security Signal Integrity: Semantic Structure","description":"Validates semantic HTML structure for humans, agents, and assistive technology for security posture visibility, policy checks, and hardened transport behavior. Evidence should include heading, landmark, and element evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Security Signal Integrity: Semantic Structure appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with measured evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the semantic structure evidence for security signal integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-security-05","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["security","headers","transport","integrity","semantic-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(Boolean(r.headers.get('strict-transport-security')||r.headers.get('content-security-policy'))))\" # group:security check:5","humanCommand":"Review critical headers and transport policy hardening against OWASP guidance; review the semantic-structure evidence dimension for Security Signal Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-security-06","testId":"ni-security-06","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Security Signal Integrity: Machine Readability","description":"Validates machine-readable public content and predictable parsing surfaces for security posture visibility, policy checks, and hardened transport behavior. Evidence should include structured tags, JSON-LD, and document-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Security Signal Integrity: Machine Readability appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with measured evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the machine readability evidence for security signal integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-security-06","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["security","headers","transport","integrity","machine-readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(Boolean(r.headers.get('strict-transport-security')||r.headers.get('content-security-policy'))))\" # group:security check:6","humanCommand":"Review critical headers and transport policy hardening against OWASP guidance; review the machine-readability evidence dimension for Security Signal Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-security-07","testId":"ni-security-07","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Security Signal Integrity: Agent Discovery","description":"Validates agent discovery hints and AI-readable policy/documentation signals for security posture visibility, policy checks, and hardened transport behavior. Evidence should include llms, policy, MCP, OpenAPI, or schema evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Security Signal Integrity: Agent Discovery appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with measured evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the agent discovery evidence for security signal integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-security-07","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["security","headers","transport","integrity","agent-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(Boolean(r.headers.get('strict-transport-security')||r.headers.get('content-security-policy'))))\" # group:security check:7","humanCommand":"Review critical headers and transport policy hardening against OWASP guidance; review the agent-discovery evidence dimension for Security Signal Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-security-08","testId":"ni-security-08","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Security Signal Integrity: Crawler Discovery","description":"Validates crawler discovery paths through robots, sitemap, feeds, and canonical links for security posture visibility, policy checks, and hardened transport behavior. Evidence should include discovery artifact and link evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Security Signal Integrity: Crawler Discovery appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with measured evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the crawler discovery evidence for security signal integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-security-08","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["security","headers","transport","integrity","crawler-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(Boolean(r.headers.get('strict-transport-security')||r.headers.get('content-security-policy'))))\" # group:security check:8","humanCommand":"Review critical headers and transport policy hardening against OWASP guidance; review the crawler-discovery evidence dimension for Security Signal Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-security-09","testId":"ni-security-09","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Security Signal Integrity: Answerability","description":"Validates direct answer extraction and quotable explanatory content for security posture visibility, policy checks, and hardened transport behavior. Evidence should include question, summary, heading, and paragraph evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Security Signal Integrity: Answerability appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with measured evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the answerability evidence for security signal integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-security-09","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["security","headers","transport","integrity","answerability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(Boolean(r.headers.get('strict-transport-security')||r.headers.get('content-security-policy'))))\" # group:security check:9","humanCommand":"Review critical headers and transport policy hardening against OWASP guidance; review the answerability evidence dimension for Security Signal Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-security-10","testId":"ni-security-10","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Security Signal Integrity: Generative Context","description":"Validates GEO context quality for generative engines without inventing measured facts for security posture visibility, policy checks, and hardened transport behavior. Evidence should include entity, source, and instruction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Security Signal Integrity: Generative Context appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with measured evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the generative context evidence for security signal integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-security-10","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["security","headers","transport","integrity","generative-context","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(Boolean(r.headers.get('strict-transport-security')||r.headers.get('content-security-policy'))))\" # group:security check:10","humanCommand":"Review critical headers and transport policy hardening against OWASP guidance; review the generative-context evidence dimension for Security Signal Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-security-11","testId":"ni-security-11","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Security Signal Integrity: Search Intent","description":"Validates search intent alignment and snippet-friendly content structure for security posture visibility, policy checks, and hardened transport behavior. Evidence should include metadata, headings, and topical text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Security Signal Integrity: Search Intent appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with measured evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the search intent evidence for security signal integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-security-11","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["security","headers","transport","integrity","search-intent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(Boolean(r.headers.get('strict-transport-security')||r.headers.get('content-security-policy'))))\" # group:security check:11","humanCommand":"Review critical headers and transport policy hardening against OWASP guidance; review the search-intent evidence dimension for Security Signal Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-security-12","testId":"ni-security-12","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Security Signal Integrity: Accessibility Semantics","description":"Validates accessible names, relationships, landmarks, and keyboard-relevant structure for security posture visibility, policy checks, and hardened transport behavior. Evidence should include ARIA, labels, landmarks, and control evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Security Signal Integrity: Accessibility Semantics appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with measured evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the accessibility semantics evidence for security signal integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-security-12","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["security","headers","transport","integrity","accessibility-semantics","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(Boolean(r.headers.get('strict-transport-security')||r.headers.get('content-security-policy'))))\" # group:security check:12","humanCommand":"Review critical headers and transport policy hardening against OWASP guidance; review the accessibility-semantics evidence dimension for Security Signal Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-security-13","testId":"ni-security-13","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Security Signal Integrity: Mobile Readiness","description":"Validates mobile viewport, responsive content, and touch-friendly layout signals for security posture visibility, policy checks, and hardened transport behavior. Evidence should include viewport and responsive asset evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Security Signal Integrity: Mobile Readiness appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with measured evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the mobile readiness evidence for security signal integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-security-13","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["security","headers","transport","integrity","mobile-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(Boolean(r.headers.get('strict-transport-security')||r.headers.get('content-security-policy'))))\" # group:security check:13","humanCommand":"Review critical headers and transport policy hardening against OWASP guidance; review the mobile-readiness evidence dimension for Security Signal Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-security-14","testId":"ni-security-14","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Security Signal Integrity: Performance Budget","description":"Validates performance budget compliance using measured or bounded deterministic inputs for security posture visibility, policy checks, and hardened transport behavior. Evidence should include timing, byte, and Lighthouse-derived evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Security Signal Integrity: Performance Budget appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with measured evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the performance budget evidence for security signal integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-security-14","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["security","headers","transport","integrity","performance-budget","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(Boolean(r.headers.get('strict-transport-security')||r.headers.get('content-security-policy'))))\" # group:security check:14","humanCommand":"Review critical headers and transport policy hardening against OWASP guidance; review the performance-budget evidence dimension for Security Signal Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-security-15","testId":"ni-security-15","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Security Signal Integrity: Resource Efficiency","description":"Validates resource size, script/style count, and optimization opportunity signals for security posture visibility, policy checks, and hardened transport behavior. Evidence should include resource and markup evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Security Signal Integrity: Resource Efficiency appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with measured evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the resource efficiency evidence for security signal integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-security-15","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["security","headers","transport","integrity","resource-efficiency","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(Boolean(r.headers.get('strict-transport-security')||r.headers.get('content-security-policy'))))\" # group:security check:15","humanCommand":"Review critical headers and transport policy hardening against OWASP guidance; review the resource-efficiency evidence dimension for Security Signal Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-security-16","testId":"ni-security-16","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Security Signal Integrity: Cache Freshness","description":"Validates cache behavior, freshness hints, and stale-content risk for security posture visibility, policy checks, and hardened transport behavior. Evidence should include HTTP cache and timestamp evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Security Signal Integrity: Cache Freshness appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with measured evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the cache freshness evidence for security signal integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-security-16","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["security","headers","transport","integrity","cache-freshness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(Boolean(r.headers.get('strict-transport-security')||r.headers.get('content-security-policy'))))\" # group:security check:16","humanCommand":"Review critical headers and transport policy hardening against OWASP guidance; review the cache-freshness evidence dimension for Security Signal Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-security-17","testId":"ni-security-17","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Security Signal Integrity: Route Reliability","description":"Validates route reliability, redirect safety, and dead-link risk for security posture visibility, policy checks, and hardened transport behavior. Evidence should include status, redirect, and sitemap evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Security Signal Integrity: Route Reliability appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with measured evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the route reliability evidence for security signal integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-security-17","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["security","headers","transport","integrity","route-reliability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(Boolean(r.headers.get('strict-transport-security')||r.headers.get('content-security-policy'))))\" # group:security check:17","humanCommand":"Review critical headers and transport policy hardening against OWASP guidance; review the route-reliability evidence dimension for Security Signal Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-security-18","testId":"ni-security-18","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Security Signal Integrity: Feed Quality","description":"Validates RSS/Atom/feed usefulness, parseability, and freshness for security posture visibility, policy checks, and hardened transport behavior. Evidence should include feed XML and item evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Security Signal Integrity: Feed Quality appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with measured evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the feed quality evidence for security signal integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-security-18","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["security","headers","transport","integrity","feed-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(Boolean(r.headers.get('strict-transport-security')||r.headers.get('content-security-policy'))))\" # group:security check:18","humanCommand":"Review critical headers and transport policy hardening against OWASP guidance; review the feed-quality evidence dimension for Security Signal Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-security-19","testId":"ni-security-19","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Security Signal Integrity: Sitemap Quality","description":"Validates sitemap validity, public-safe URL coverage, and no-dead-link policy for security posture visibility, policy checks, and hardened transport behavior. Evidence should include sitemap XML and bounded link-check evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Security Signal Integrity: Sitemap Quality appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with measured evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the sitemap quality evidence for security signal integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-security-19","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["security","headers","transport","integrity","sitemap-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(Boolean(r.headers.get('strict-transport-security')||r.headers.get('content-security-policy'))))\" # group:security check:19","humanCommand":"Review critical headers and transport policy hardening against OWASP guidance; review the sitemap-quality evidence dimension for Security Signal Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-security-20","testId":"ni-security-20","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Security Signal Integrity: Robots Alignment","description":"Validates robots.txt alignment with public/protected policy and sitemap discovery for security posture visibility, policy checks, and hardened transport behavior. Evidence should include robots directives and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Security Signal Integrity: Robots Alignment appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with measured evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the robots alignment evidence for security signal integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-security-20","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["security","headers","transport","integrity","robots-alignment","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(Boolean(r.headers.get('strict-transport-security')||r.headers.get('content-security-policy'))))\" # group:security check:20","humanCommand":"Review critical headers and transport policy hardening against OWASP guidance; review the robots-alignment evidence dimension for Security Signal Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-security-21","testId":"ni-security-21","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Security Signal Integrity: Llms Structure","description":"Validates llms.txt structure, readability, endpoint coverage, and agent usefulness for security posture visibility, policy checks, and hardened transport behavior. Evidence should include plain-text section and line-length evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Security Signal Integrity: Llms Structure appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with measured evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms structure evidence for security signal integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-security-21","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["security","headers","transport","integrity","llms-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(Boolean(r.headers.get('strict-transport-security')||r.headers.get('content-security-policy'))))\" # group:security check:21","humanCommand":"Review critical headers and transport policy hardening against OWASP guidance; review the llms-structure evidence dimension for Security Signal Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-security-22","testId":"ni-security-22","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Security Signal Integrity: Llms Index Schema","description":"Validates llms-index JSON schema shape and count reconciliation for security posture visibility, policy checks, and hardened transport behavior. Evidence should include JSON keys, counts, and endpoint evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Security Signal Integrity: Llms Index Schema appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with measured evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms index schema evidence for security signal integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-security-22","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["security","headers","transport","integrity","llms-index-schema","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(Boolean(r.headers.get('strict-transport-security')||r.headers.get('content-security-policy'))))\" # group:security check:22","humanCommand":"Review critical headers and transport policy hardening against OWASP guidance; review the llms-index-schema evidence dimension for Security Signal Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-security-23","testId":"ni-security-23","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Security Signal Integrity: Humans Attribution","description":"Validates humans.txt attribution, maintainer, technology, and governance transparency for security posture visibility, policy checks, and hardened transport behavior. Evidence should include humans.txt section evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Security Signal Integrity: Humans Attribution appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with measured evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the humans attribution evidence for security signal integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-security-23","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["security","headers","transport","integrity","humans-attribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(Boolean(r.headers.get('strict-transport-security')||r.headers.get('content-security-policy'))))\" # group:security check:23","humanCommand":"Review critical headers and transport policy hardening against OWASP guidance; review the humans-attribution evidence dimension for Security Signal Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-security-24","testId":"ni-security-24","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Security Signal Integrity: Agent Policy","description":"Validates agent-policy JSON clarity for allowed, disallowed, and protected operations for security posture visibility, policy checks, and hardened transport behavior. Evidence should include well-known policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Security Signal Integrity: Agent Policy appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with measured evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the agent policy evidence for security signal integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-security-24","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["security","headers","transport","integrity","agent-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(Boolean(r.headers.get('strict-transport-security')||r.headers.get('content-security-policy'))))\" # group:security check:24","humanCommand":"Review critical headers and transport policy hardening against OWASP guidance; review the agent-policy evidence dimension for Security Signal Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-security-25","testId":"ni-security-25","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Security Signal Integrity: Ai Policy","description":"Validates AI policy clarity for training, search, answer use, caching, and attribution for security posture visibility, policy checks, and hardened transport behavior. Evidence should include well-known AI policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Security Signal Integrity: Ai Policy appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with measured evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ai policy evidence for security signal integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-security-25","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["security","headers","transport","integrity","ai-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(Boolean(r.headers.get('strict-transport-security')||r.headers.get('content-security-policy'))))\" # group:security check:25","humanCommand":"Review critical headers and transport policy hardening against OWASP guidance; review the ai-policy evidence dimension for Security Signal Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-security-26","testId":"ni-security-26","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Security Signal Integrity: Trust Policy","description":"Validates trust policy coverage for privacy, traceability, metadata, and protected actions for security posture visibility, policy checks, and hardened transport behavior. Evidence should include trust.json evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Security Signal Integrity: Trust Policy appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with measured evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the trust policy evidence for security signal integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-security-26","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["security","headers","transport","integrity","trust-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(Boolean(r.headers.get('strict-transport-security')||r.headers.get('content-security-policy'))))\" # group:security check:26","humanCommand":"Review critical headers and transport policy hardening against OWASP guidance; review the trust-policy evidence dimension for Security Signal Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-security-27","testId":"ni-security-27","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Security Signal Integrity: Openapi Contract","description":"Validates OpenAPI availability, server URL accuracy, schemas, and auth policy for security posture visibility, policy checks, and hardened transport behavior. Evidence should include OpenAPI text/JSON evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Security Signal Integrity: Openapi Contract appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with measured evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the openapi contract evidence for security signal integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-security-27","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["security","headers","transport","integrity","openapi-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(Boolean(r.headers.get('strict-transport-security')||r.headers.get('content-security-policy'))))\" # group:security check:27","humanCommand":"Review critical headers and transport policy hardening against OWASP guidance; review the openapi-contract evidence dimension for Security Signal Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-security-28","testId":"ni-security-28","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Security Signal Integrity: Mcp Contract","description":"Validates MCP JSON-RPC introspection, real tools, resources, and protected boundaries for security posture visibility, policy checks, and hardened transport behavior. Evidence should include MCP manifest and initialize evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Security Signal Integrity: Mcp Contract appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with measured evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the mcp contract evidence for security signal integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-security-28","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["security","headers","transport","integrity","mcp-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(Boolean(r.headers.get('strict-transport-security')||r.headers.get('content-security-policy'))))\" # group:security check:28","humanCommand":"Review critical headers and transport policy hardening against OWASP guidance; review the mcp-contract evidence dimension for Security Signal Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-security-29","testId":"ni-security-29","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Security Signal Integrity: Api Error Shape","description":"Validates API success/error response shape consistency for security posture visibility, policy checks, and hardened transport behavior. Evidence should include REST envelope evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Security Signal Integrity: Api Error Shape appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with measured evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the api error shape evidence for security signal integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-security-29","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["security","headers","transport","integrity","api-error-shape","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(Boolean(r.headers.get('strict-transport-security')||r.headers.get('content-security-policy'))))\" # group:security check:29","humanCommand":"Review critical headers and transport policy hardening against OWASP guidance; review the api-error-shape evidence dimension for Security Signal Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-security-30","testId":"ni-security-30","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Security Signal Integrity: Traceability","description":"Validates trace propagation, request IDs, and safe observability correlation for security posture visibility, policy checks, and hardened transport behavior. Evidence should include trace header and metadata evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Security Signal Integrity: Traceability appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with measured evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the traceability evidence for security signal integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-security-30","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["security","headers","transport","integrity","traceability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(Boolean(r.headers.get('strict-transport-security')||r.headers.get('content-security-policy'))))\" # group:security check:30","humanCommand":"Review critical headers and transport policy hardening against OWASP guidance; review the traceability evidence dimension for Security Signal Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-security-31","testId":"ni-security-31","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Security Signal Integrity: Ja4 Redaction","description":"Validates fingerprint-adjacent metadata redaction and non-public raw JA4 handling for security posture visibility, policy checks, and hardened transport behavior. Evidence should include metadata policy and redaction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Security Signal Integrity: Ja4 Redaction appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with measured evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the ja4 redaction evidence for security signal integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-security-31","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["security","headers","transport","integrity","ja4-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(Boolean(r.headers.get('strict-transport-security')||r.headers.get('content-security-policy'))))\" # group:security check:31","humanCommand":"Review critical headers and transport policy hardening against OWASP guidance; review the ja4-redaction evidence dimension for Security Signal Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-security-32","testId":"ni-security-32","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Security Signal Integrity: Secret Redaction","description":"Validates absence of secrets, generic key examples, cookies, and raw tokens in public outputs for security posture visibility, policy checks, and hardened transport behavior. Evidence should include public artifact scan evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Security Signal Integrity: Secret Redaction appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with measured evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the secret redaction evidence for security signal integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-security-32","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["security","headers","transport","integrity","secret-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(Boolean(r.headers.get('strict-transport-security')||r.headers.get('content-security-policy'))))\" # group:security check:32","humanCommand":"Review critical headers and transport policy hardening against OWASP guidance; review the secret-redaction evidence dimension for Security Signal Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-security-33","testId":"ni-security-33","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Security Signal Integrity: Security Headers","description":"Validates security header coverage and hardened transport signals for security posture visibility, policy checks, and hardened transport behavior. Evidence should include HTTP header evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Security Signal Integrity: Security Headers appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with measured evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the security headers evidence for security signal integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-security-33","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["security","headers","transport","integrity","security-headers","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(Boolean(r.headers.get('strict-transport-security')||r.headers.get('content-security-policy'))))\" # group:security check:33","humanCommand":"Review critical headers and transport policy hardening against OWASP guidance; review the security-headers evidence dimension for Security Signal Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-security-34","testId":"ni-security-34","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Security Signal Integrity: Privacy Consent","description":"Validates privacy policy, consent, attribution, and data-use disclosure quality for security posture visibility, policy checks, and hardened transport behavior. Evidence should include public page and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Security Signal Integrity: Privacy Consent appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with measured evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the privacy consent evidence for security signal integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-security-34","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["security","headers","transport","integrity","privacy-consent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(Boolean(r.headers.get('strict-transport-security')||r.headers.get('content-security-policy'))))\" # group:security check:34","humanCommand":"Review critical headers and transport policy hardening against OWASP guidance; review the privacy-consent evidence dimension for Security Signal Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-security-35","testId":"ni-security-35","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Security Signal Integrity: Structured Data","description":"Validates JSON-LD and entity modeling for machine interpretation for security posture visibility, policy checks, and hardened transport behavior. Evidence should include schema block and parse evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Security Signal Integrity: Structured Data appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with measured evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the structured data evidence for security signal integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-security-35","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["security","headers","transport","integrity","structured-data","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(Boolean(r.headers.get('strict-transport-security')||r.headers.get('content-security-policy'))))\" # group:security check:35","humanCommand":"Review critical headers and transport policy hardening against OWASP guidance; review the structured-data evidence dimension for Security Signal Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-security-36","testId":"ni-security-36","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Security Signal Integrity: Social Preview","description":"Validates Open Graph and Twitter/X card readiness for public sharing for security posture visibility, policy checks, and hardened transport behavior. Evidence should include meta tag evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Security Signal Integrity: Social Preview appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with measured evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the social preview evidence for security signal integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-security-36","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["security","headers","transport","integrity","social-preview","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(Boolean(r.headers.get('strict-transport-security')||r.headers.get('content-security-policy'))))\" # group:security check:36","humanCommand":"Review critical headers and transport policy hardening against OWASP guidance; review the social-preview evidence dimension for Security Signal Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-security-37","testId":"ni-security-37","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Security Signal Integrity: I18n Routing","description":"Validates locale route, hreflang, language declaration, and translation readiness for security posture visibility, policy checks, and hardened transport behavior. Evidence should include lang/hreflang and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Security Signal Integrity: I18n Routing appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with measured evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the i18n routing evidence for security signal integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-security-37","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["security","headers","transport","integrity","i18n-routing","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(Boolean(r.headers.get('strict-transport-security')||r.headers.get('content-security-policy'))))\" # group:security check:37","humanCommand":"Review critical headers and transport policy hardening against OWASP guidance; review the i18n-routing evidence dimension for Security Signal Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-security-38","testId":"ni-security-38","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Security Signal Integrity: Readability","description":"Validates human readability, sectioning, sentence complexity, and comprehension support for security posture visibility, policy checks, and hardened transport behavior. Evidence should include extracted content evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Security Signal Integrity: Readability appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with measured evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the readability evidence for security signal integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-security-38","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["security","headers","transport","integrity","readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(Boolean(r.headers.get('strict-transport-security')||r.headers.get('content-security-policy'))))\" # group:security check:38","humanCommand":"Review critical headers and transport policy hardening against OWASP guidance; review the readability evidence dimension for Security Signal Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-security-39","testId":"ni-security-39","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Security Signal Integrity: Content Utility","description":"Validates non-placeholder content usefulness and domain-specific public value for security posture visibility, policy checks, and hardened transport behavior. Evidence should include content extraction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Security Signal Integrity: Content Utility appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with measured evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the content utility evidence for security signal integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-security-39","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["security","headers","transport","integrity","content-utility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(Boolean(r.headers.get('strict-transport-security')||r.headers.get('content-security-policy'))))\" # group:security check:39","humanCommand":"Review critical headers and transport policy hardening against OWASP guidance; review the content-utility evidence dimension for Security Signal Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-security-40","testId":"ni-security-40","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Security Signal Integrity: Recommendation Grounding","description":"Validates recommendation grounding in deterministic evidence instead of fabricated model output for security posture visibility, policy checks, and hardened transport behavior. Evidence should include issue and remediation evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Security Signal Integrity: Recommendation Grounding appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with measured evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the recommendation grounding evidence for security signal integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-security-40","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["security","headers","transport","integrity","recommendation-grounding","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(Boolean(r.headers.get('strict-transport-security')||r.headers.get('content-security-policy'))))\" # group:security check:40","humanCommand":"Review critical headers and transport policy hardening against OWASP guidance; review the recommendation-grounding evidence dimension for Security Signal Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-security-41","testId":"ni-security-41","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Security Signal Integrity: Evidence Quality","description":"Validates evidence completeness, public safety, and reproducibility for security posture visibility, policy checks, and hardened transport behavior. Evidence should include test output and artifact evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Security Signal Integrity: Evidence Quality appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with measured evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the evidence quality evidence for security signal integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-security-41","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["security","headers","transport","integrity","evidence-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(Boolean(r.headers.get('strict-transport-security')||r.headers.get('content-security-policy'))))\" # group:security check:41","humanCommand":"Review critical headers and transport policy hardening against OWASP guidance; review the evidence-quality evidence dimension for Security Signal Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-security-42","testId":"ni-security-42","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Security Signal Integrity: Threshold Policy","description":"Validates threshold clarity, pass/warn/fail semantics, and scoring transparency for security posture visibility, policy checks, and hardened transport behavior. Evidence should include threshold and result status evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Security Signal Integrity: Threshold Policy appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with measured evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the threshold policy evidence for security signal integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-security-42","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["security","headers","transport","integrity","threshold-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(Boolean(r.headers.get('strict-transport-security')||r.headers.get('content-security-policy'))))\" # group:security check:42","humanCommand":"Review critical headers and transport policy hardening against OWASP guidance; review the threshold-policy evidence dimension for Security Signal Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-security-43","testId":"ni-security-43","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Security Signal Integrity: Confidence","description":"Validates confidence scoring and degraded-input disclosure for security posture visibility, policy checks, and hardened transport behavior. Evidence should include source freshness and input availability evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Security Signal Integrity: Confidence appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with measured evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the confidence evidence for security signal integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-security-43","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["security","headers","transport","integrity","confidence","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(Boolean(r.headers.get('strict-transport-security')||r.headers.get('content-security-policy'))))\" # group:security check:43","humanCommand":"Review critical headers and transport policy hardening against OWASP guidance; review the confidence evidence dimension for Security Signal Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-security-44","testId":"ni-security-44","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Security Signal Integrity: Trend Readiness","description":"Validates historical comparability and timeline readiness for future reruns for security posture visibility, policy checks, and hardened transport behavior. Evidence should include analysis ID, timestamp, and persistence evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Security Signal Integrity: Trend Readiness appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with measured evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the trend readiness evidence for security signal integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-security-44","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["security","headers","transport","integrity","trend-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(Boolean(r.headers.get('strict-transport-security')||r.headers.get('content-security-policy'))))\" # group:security check:44","humanCommand":"Review critical headers and transport policy hardening against OWASP guidance; review the trend-readiness evidence dimension for Security Signal Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-security-45","testId":"ni-security-45","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Security Signal Integrity: Ranking Readiness","description":"Validates ranking input completeness and profile compatibility for security posture visibility, policy checks, and hardened transport behavior. Evidence should include score and profile evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Security Signal Integrity: Ranking Readiness appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with measured evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ranking readiness evidence for security signal integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-security-45","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["security","headers","transport","integrity","ranking-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(Boolean(r.headers.get('strict-transport-security')||r.headers.get('content-security-policy'))))\" # group:security check:45","humanCommand":"Review critical headers and transport policy hardening against OWASP guidance; review the ranking-readiness evidence dimension for Security Signal Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-security-46","testId":"ni-security-46","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Security Signal Integrity: Network Contribution","description":"Validates PlatPhorm network contribution through discovery, integrations, and standards compliance for security posture visibility, policy checks, and hardened transport behavior. Evidence should include network graph and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Security Signal Integrity: Network Contribution appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with measured evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the network contribution evidence for security signal integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-security-46","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["security","headers","transport","integrity","network-contribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(Boolean(r.headers.get('strict-transport-security')||r.headers.get('content-security-policy'))))\" # group:security check:46","humanCommand":"Review critical headers and transport policy hardening against OWASP guidance; review the network-contribution evidence dimension for Security Signal Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-security-47","testId":"ni-security-47","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Security Signal Integrity: Report Readiness","description":"Validates report/export categorization with public-safe evidence and protected boundaries for security posture visibility, policy checks, and hardened transport behavior. Evidence should include report section mapping evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Security Signal Integrity: Report Readiness appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with measured evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the report readiness evidence for security signal integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-security-47","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["security","headers","transport","integrity","report-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(Boolean(r.headers.get('strict-transport-security')||r.headers.get('content-security-policy'))))\" # group:security check:47","humanCommand":"Review critical headers and transport policy hardening against OWASP guidance; review the report-readiness evidence dimension for Security Signal Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-security-48","testId":"ni-security-48","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Security Signal Integrity: Operator Actionability","description":"Validates clear remediation, owner action, difficulty, and retest path for security posture visibility, policy checks, and hardened transport behavior. Evidence should include fix instructions and command evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Security Signal Integrity: Operator Actionability appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with measured evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the operator actionability evidence for security signal integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-security-48","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["security","headers","transport","integrity","operator-actionability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(Boolean(r.headers.get('strict-transport-security')||r.headers.get('content-security-policy'))))\" # group:security check:48","humanCommand":"Review critical headers and transport policy hardening against OWASP guidance; review the operator-actionability evidence dimension for Security Signal Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-security-49","testId":"ni-security-49","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Security Signal Integrity: Degraded State","description":"Validates honest degraded, unavailable, skipped, and not-applicable states for security posture visibility, policy checks, and hardened transport behavior. Evidence should include status and storage evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Security Signal Integrity: Degraded State appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with measured evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the degraded state evidence for security signal integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-security-49","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["security","headers","transport","integrity","degraded-state","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(Boolean(r.headers.get('strict-transport-security')||r.headers.get('content-security-policy'))))\" # group:security check:49","humanCommand":"Review critical headers and transport policy hardening against OWASP guidance; review the degraded-state evidence dimension for Security Signal Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-security-50","testId":"ni-security-50","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Security Signal Integrity: Reproducibility","description":"Validates stable CLI/API/human reproduction path and deterministic rerun instructions for security posture visibility, policy checks, and hardened transport behavior. Evidence should include commands and registry version evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"measured","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"measured","publicReadout":"Security Signal Integrity: Reproducibility appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with measured evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the reproducibility evidence for security signal integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-security-50","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["security","headers","transport","integrity","reproducibility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com').then(r=>console.log(Boolean(r.headers.get('strict-transport-security')||r.headers.get('content-security-policy'))))\" # group:security check:50","humanCommand":"Review critical headers and transport policy hardening against OWASP guidance; review the reproducibility evidence dimension for Security Signal Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-privacy-01","testId":"ni-privacy-01","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Availability","description":"Validates public route availability and successful bounded fetch behavior for consent patterns, privacy transparency, and user trust controls. Evidence should include HTTP status, timeout, and redirect evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Availability appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the availability evidence for privacy and consent integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-privacy-01","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["privacy","consent","trust","compliance","availability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/privacy').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:privacy check:1","humanCommand":"Confirm privacy, consent, and data usage disclosures are accessible and current; review the availability evidence dimension for Privacy and Consent Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-privacy-02","testId":"ni-privacy-02","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Public Safety","description":"Validates public-safe access boundaries without exposing private or protected data for consent patterns, privacy transparency, and user trust controls. Evidence should include route policy and response-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Public Safety appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the public safety evidence for privacy and consent integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-privacy-02","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["privacy","consent","trust","compliance","public-safety","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/privacy').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:privacy check:2","humanCommand":"Confirm privacy, consent, and data usage disclosures are accessible and current; review the public-safety evidence dimension for Privacy and Consent Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-privacy-03","testId":"ni-privacy-03","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Canonical Url","description":"Validates canonical URL stability and normalized route identity for consent patterns, privacy transparency, and user trust controls. Evidence should include canonical tags, redirects, and normalized URL evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Canonical Url appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the canonical url evidence for privacy and consent integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-privacy-03","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["privacy","consent","trust","compliance","canonical-url","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/privacy').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:privacy check:3","humanCommand":"Confirm privacy, consent, and data usage disclosures are accessible and current; review the canonical-url evidence dimension for Privacy and Consent Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-privacy-04","testId":"ni-privacy-04","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Metadata Clarity","description":"Validates title, description, and page-specific metadata clarity for consent patterns, privacy transparency, and user trust controls. Evidence should include HTML metadata and extracted text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Metadata Clarity appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the metadata clarity evidence for privacy and consent integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-privacy-04","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["privacy","consent","trust","compliance","metadata-clarity","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/privacy').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:privacy check:4","humanCommand":"Confirm privacy, consent, and data usage disclosures are accessible and current; review the metadata-clarity evidence dimension for Privacy and Consent Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-privacy-05","testId":"ni-privacy-05","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Semantic Structure","description":"Validates semantic HTML structure for humans, agents, and assistive technology for consent patterns, privacy transparency, and user trust controls. Evidence should include heading, landmark, and element evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Semantic Structure appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the semantic structure evidence for privacy and consent integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-privacy-05","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["privacy","consent","trust","compliance","semantic-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/privacy').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:privacy check:5","humanCommand":"Confirm privacy, consent, and data usage disclosures are accessible and current; review the semantic-structure evidence dimension for Privacy and Consent Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-privacy-06","testId":"ni-privacy-06","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Machine Readability","description":"Validates machine-readable public content and predictable parsing surfaces for consent patterns, privacy transparency, and user trust controls. Evidence should include structured tags, JSON-LD, and document-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Machine Readability appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the machine readability evidence for privacy and consent integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-privacy-06","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["privacy","consent","trust","compliance","machine-readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/privacy').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:privacy check:6","humanCommand":"Confirm privacy, consent, and data usage disclosures are accessible and current; review the machine-readability evidence dimension for Privacy and Consent Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-privacy-07","testId":"ni-privacy-07","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Agent Discovery","description":"Validates agent discovery hints and AI-readable policy/documentation signals for consent patterns, privacy transparency, and user trust controls. Evidence should include llms, policy, MCP, OpenAPI, or schema evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Agent Discovery appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the agent discovery evidence for privacy and consent integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-privacy-07","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["privacy","consent","trust","compliance","agent-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/privacy').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:privacy check:7","humanCommand":"Confirm privacy, consent, and data usage disclosures are accessible and current; review the agent-discovery evidence dimension for Privacy and Consent Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-privacy-08","testId":"ni-privacy-08","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Crawler Discovery","description":"Validates crawler discovery paths through robots, sitemap, feeds, and canonical links for consent patterns, privacy transparency, and user trust controls. Evidence should include discovery artifact and link evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Crawler Discovery appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the crawler discovery evidence for privacy and consent integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-privacy-08","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["privacy","consent","trust","compliance","crawler-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/privacy').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:privacy check:8","humanCommand":"Confirm privacy, consent, and data usage disclosures are accessible and current; review the crawler-discovery evidence dimension for Privacy and Consent Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-privacy-09","testId":"ni-privacy-09","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Answerability","description":"Validates direct answer extraction and quotable explanatory content for consent patterns, privacy transparency, and user trust controls. Evidence should include question, summary, heading, and paragraph evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Answerability appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the answerability evidence for privacy and consent integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-privacy-09","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["privacy","consent","trust","compliance","answerability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/privacy').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:privacy check:9","humanCommand":"Confirm privacy, consent, and data usage disclosures are accessible and current; review the answerability evidence dimension for Privacy and Consent Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-privacy-10","testId":"ni-privacy-10","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Generative Context","description":"Validates GEO context quality for generative engines without inventing measured facts for consent patterns, privacy transparency, and user trust controls. Evidence should include entity, source, and instruction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Generative Context appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the generative context evidence for privacy and consent integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-privacy-10","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["privacy","consent","trust","compliance","generative-context","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/privacy').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:privacy check:10","humanCommand":"Confirm privacy, consent, and data usage disclosures are accessible and current; review the generative-context evidence dimension for Privacy and Consent Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-privacy-11","testId":"ni-privacy-11","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Search Intent","description":"Validates search intent alignment and snippet-friendly content structure for consent patterns, privacy transparency, and user trust controls. Evidence should include metadata, headings, and topical text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Search Intent appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the search intent evidence for privacy and consent integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-privacy-11","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["privacy","consent","trust","compliance","search-intent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/privacy').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:privacy check:11","humanCommand":"Confirm privacy, consent, and data usage disclosures are accessible and current; review the search-intent evidence dimension for Privacy and Consent Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-privacy-12","testId":"ni-privacy-12","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Accessibility Semantics","description":"Validates accessible names, relationships, landmarks, and keyboard-relevant structure for consent patterns, privacy transparency, and user trust controls. Evidence should include ARIA, labels, landmarks, and control evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Accessibility Semantics appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the accessibility semantics evidence for privacy and consent integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-privacy-12","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["privacy","consent","trust","compliance","accessibility-semantics","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/privacy').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:privacy check:12","humanCommand":"Confirm privacy, consent, and data usage disclosures are accessible and current; review the accessibility-semantics evidence dimension for Privacy and Consent Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-privacy-13","testId":"ni-privacy-13","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Mobile Readiness","description":"Validates mobile viewport, responsive content, and touch-friendly layout signals for consent patterns, privacy transparency, and user trust controls. Evidence should include viewport and responsive asset evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Mobile Readiness appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the mobile readiness evidence for privacy and consent integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-privacy-13","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["privacy","consent","trust","compliance","mobile-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/privacy').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:privacy check:13","humanCommand":"Confirm privacy, consent, and data usage disclosures are accessible and current; review the mobile-readiness evidence dimension for Privacy and Consent Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-privacy-14","testId":"ni-privacy-14","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Performance Budget","description":"Validates performance budget compliance using measured or bounded deterministic inputs for consent patterns, privacy transparency, and user trust controls. Evidence should include timing, byte, and Lighthouse-derived evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Performance Budget appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the performance budget evidence for privacy and consent integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-privacy-14","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["privacy","consent","trust","compliance","performance-budget","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/privacy').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:privacy check:14","humanCommand":"Confirm privacy, consent, and data usage disclosures are accessible and current; review the performance-budget evidence dimension for Privacy and Consent Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-privacy-15","testId":"ni-privacy-15","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Resource Efficiency","description":"Validates resource size, script/style count, and optimization opportunity signals for consent patterns, privacy transparency, and user trust controls. Evidence should include resource and markup evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Resource Efficiency appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the resource efficiency evidence for privacy and consent integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-privacy-15","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["privacy","consent","trust","compliance","resource-efficiency","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/privacy').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:privacy check:15","humanCommand":"Confirm privacy, consent, and data usage disclosures are accessible and current; review the resource-efficiency evidence dimension for Privacy and Consent Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-privacy-16","testId":"ni-privacy-16","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Cache Freshness","description":"Validates cache behavior, freshness hints, and stale-content risk for consent patterns, privacy transparency, and user trust controls. Evidence should include HTTP cache and timestamp evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Cache Freshness appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the cache freshness evidence for privacy and consent integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-privacy-16","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["privacy","consent","trust","compliance","cache-freshness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/privacy').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:privacy check:16","humanCommand":"Confirm privacy, consent, and data usage disclosures are accessible and current; review the cache-freshness evidence dimension for Privacy and Consent Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-privacy-17","testId":"ni-privacy-17","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Route Reliability","description":"Validates route reliability, redirect safety, and dead-link risk for consent patterns, privacy transparency, and user trust controls. Evidence should include status, redirect, and sitemap evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Route Reliability appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the route reliability evidence for privacy and consent integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-privacy-17","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["privacy","consent","trust","compliance","route-reliability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/privacy').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:privacy check:17","humanCommand":"Confirm privacy, consent, and data usage disclosures are accessible and current; review the route-reliability evidence dimension for Privacy and Consent Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-privacy-18","testId":"ni-privacy-18","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Feed Quality","description":"Validates RSS/Atom/feed usefulness, parseability, and freshness for consent patterns, privacy transparency, and user trust controls. Evidence should include feed XML and item evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Feed Quality appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the feed quality evidence for privacy and consent integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-privacy-18","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["privacy","consent","trust","compliance","feed-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/privacy').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:privacy check:18","humanCommand":"Confirm privacy, consent, and data usage disclosures are accessible and current; review the feed-quality evidence dimension for Privacy and Consent Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-privacy-19","testId":"ni-privacy-19","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Sitemap Quality","description":"Validates sitemap validity, public-safe URL coverage, and no-dead-link policy for consent patterns, privacy transparency, and user trust controls. Evidence should include sitemap XML and bounded link-check evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Sitemap Quality appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the sitemap quality evidence for privacy and consent integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-privacy-19","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["privacy","consent","trust","compliance","sitemap-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/privacy').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:privacy check:19","humanCommand":"Confirm privacy, consent, and data usage disclosures are accessible and current; review the sitemap-quality evidence dimension for Privacy and Consent Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-privacy-20","testId":"ni-privacy-20","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Robots Alignment","description":"Validates robots.txt alignment with public/protected policy and sitemap discovery for consent patterns, privacy transparency, and user trust controls. Evidence should include robots directives and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Robots Alignment appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the robots alignment evidence for privacy and consent integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-privacy-20","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["privacy","consent","trust","compliance","robots-alignment","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/privacy').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:privacy check:20","humanCommand":"Confirm privacy, consent, and data usage disclosures are accessible and current; review the robots-alignment evidence dimension for Privacy and Consent Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-privacy-21","testId":"ni-privacy-21","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Llms Structure","description":"Validates llms.txt structure, readability, endpoint coverage, and agent usefulness for consent patterns, privacy transparency, and user trust controls. Evidence should include plain-text section and line-length evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Llms Structure appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms structure evidence for privacy and consent integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-privacy-21","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["privacy","consent","trust","compliance","llms-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/privacy').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:privacy check:21","humanCommand":"Confirm privacy, consent, and data usage disclosures are accessible and current; review the llms-structure evidence dimension for Privacy and Consent Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-privacy-22","testId":"ni-privacy-22","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Llms Index Schema","description":"Validates llms-index JSON schema shape and count reconciliation for consent patterns, privacy transparency, and user trust controls. Evidence should include JSON keys, counts, and endpoint evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Llms Index Schema appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms index schema evidence for privacy and consent integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-privacy-22","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["privacy","consent","trust","compliance","llms-index-schema","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/privacy').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:privacy check:22","humanCommand":"Confirm privacy, consent, and data usage disclosures are accessible and current; review the llms-index-schema evidence dimension for Privacy and Consent Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-privacy-23","testId":"ni-privacy-23","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Humans Attribution","description":"Validates humans.txt attribution, maintainer, technology, and governance transparency for consent patterns, privacy transparency, and user trust controls. Evidence should include humans.txt section evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Humans Attribution appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the humans attribution evidence for privacy and consent integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-privacy-23","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["privacy","consent","trust","compliance","humans-attribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/privacy').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:privacy check:23","humanCommand":"Confirm privacy, consent, and data usage disclosures are accessible and current; review the humans-attribution evidence dimension for Privacy and Consent Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-privacy-24","testId":"ni-privacy-24","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Agent Policy","description":"Validates agent-policy JSON clarity for allowed, disallowed, and protected operations for consent patterns, privacy transparency, and user trust controls. Evidence should include well-known policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Agent Policy appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the agent policy evidence for privacy and consent integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-privacy-24","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["privacy","consent","trust","compliance","agent-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/privacy').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:privacy check:24","humanCommand":"Confirm privacy, consent, and data usage disclosures are accessible and current; review the agent-policy evidence dimension for Privacy and Consent Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-privacy-25","testId":"ni-privacy-25","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Ai Policy","description":"Validates AI policy clarity for training, search, answer use, caching, and attribution for consent patterns, privacy transparency, and user trust controls. Evidence should include well-known AI policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Ai Policy appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ai policy evidence for privacy and consent integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-privacy-25","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["privacy","consent","trust","compliance","ai-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/privacy').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:privacy check:25","humanCommand":"Confirm privacy, consent, and data usage disclosures are accessible and current; review the ai-policy evidence dimension for Privacy and Consent Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-privacy-26","testId":"ni-privacy-26","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Trust Policy","description":"Validates trust policy coverage for privacy, traceability, metadata, and protected actions for consent patterns, privacy transparency, and user trust controls. Evidence should include trust.json evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Trust Policy appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the trust policy evidence for privacy and consent integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-privacy-26","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["privacy","consent","trust","compliance","trust-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/privacy').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:privacy check:26","humanCommand":"Confirm privacy, consent, and data usage disclosures are accessible and current; review the trust-policy evidence dimension for Privacy and Consent Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-privacy-27","testId":"ni-privacy-27","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Openapi Contract","description":"Validates OpenAPI availability, server URL accuracy, schemas, and auth policy for consent patterns, privacy transparency, and user trust controls. Evidence should include OpenAPI text/JSON evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Openapi Contract appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the openapi contract evidence for privacy and consent integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-privacy-27","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["privacy","consent","trust","compliance","openapi-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/privacy').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:privacy check:27","humanCommand":"Confirm privacy, consent, and data usage disclosures are accessible and current; review the openapi-contract evidence dimension for Privacy and Consent Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-privacy-28","testId":"ni-privacy-28","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Mcp Contract","description":"Validates MCP JSON-RPC introspection, real tools, resources, and protected boundaries for consent patterns, privacy transparency, and user trust controls. Evidence should include MCP manifest and initialize evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Mcp Contract appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the mcp contract evidence for privacy and consent integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-privacy-28","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["privacy","consent","trust","compliance","mcp-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/privacy').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:privacy check:28","humanCommand":"Confirm privacy, consent, and data usage disclosures are accessible and current; review the mcp-contract evidence dimension for Privacy and Consent Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-privacy-29","testId":"ni-privacy-29","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Api Error Shape","description":"Validates API success/error response shape consistency for consent patterns, privacy transparency, and user trust controls. Evidence should include REST envelope evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Api Error Shape appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the api error shape evidence for privacy and consent integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-privacy-29","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["privacy","consent","trust","compliance","api-error-shape","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/privacy').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:privacy check:29","humanCommand":"Confirm privacy, consent, and data usage disclosures are accessible and current; review the api-error-shape evidence dimension for Privacy and Consent Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-privacy-30","testId":"ni-privacy-30","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Traceability","description":"Validates trace propagation, request IDs, and safe observability correlation for consent patterns, privacy transparency, and user trust controls. Evidence should include trace header and metadata evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Traceability appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the traceability evidence for privacy and consent integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-privacy-30","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["privacy","consent","trust","compliance","traceability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/privacy').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:privacy check:30","humanCommand":"Confirm privacy, consent, and data usage disclosures are accessible and current; review the traceability evidence dimension for Privacy and Consent Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-privacy-31","testId":"ni-privacy-31","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Ja4 Redaction","description":"Validates fingerprint-adjacent metadata redaction and non-public raw JA4 handling for consent patterns, privacy transparency, and user trust controls. Evidence should include metadata policy and redaction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Ja4 Redaction appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the ja4 redaction evidence for privacy and consent integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-privacy-31","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["privacy","consent","trust","compliance","ja4-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/privacy').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:privacy check:31","humanCommand":"Confirm privacy, consent, and data usage disclosures are accessible and current; review the ja4-redaction evidence dimension for Privacy and Consent Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-privacy-32","testId":"ni-privacy-32","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Secret Redaction","description":"Validates absence of secrets, generic key examples, cookies, and raw tokens in public outputs for consent patterns, privacy transparency, and user trust controls. Evidence should include public artifact scan evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Secret Redaction appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the secret redaction evidence for privacy and consent integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-privacy-32","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["privacy","consent","trust","compliance","secret-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/privacy').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:privacy check:32","humanCommand":"Confirm privacy, consent, and data usage disclosures are accessible and current; review the secret-redaction evidence dimension for Privacy and Consent Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-privacy-33","testId":"ni-privacy-33","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Security Headers","description":"Validates security header coverage and hardened transport signals for consent patterns, privacy transparency, and user trust controls. Evidence should include HTTP header evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Security Headers appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the security headers evidence for privacy and consent integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-privacy-33","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["privacy","consent","trust","compliance","security-headers","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/privacy').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:privacy check:33","humanCommand":"Confirm privacy, consent, and data usage disclosures are accessible and current; review the security-headers evidence dimension for Privacy and Consent Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-privacy-34","testId":"ni-privacy-34","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Privacy Consent","description":"Validates privacy policy, consent, attribution, and data-use disclosure quality for consent patterns, privacy transparency, and user trust controls. Evidence should include public page and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Privacy Consent appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the privacy consent evidence for privacy and consent integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-privacy-34","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["privacy","consent","trust","compliance","privacy-consent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/privacy').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:privacy check:34","humanCommand":"Confirm privacy, consent, and data usage disclosures are accessible and current; review the privacy-consent evidence dimension for Privacy and Consent Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-privacy-35","testId":"ni-privacy-35","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Structured Data","description":"Validates JSON-LD and entity modeling for machine interpretation for consent patterns, privacy transparency, and user trust controls. Evidence should include schema block and parse evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Structured Data appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the structured data evidence for privacy and consent integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-privacy-35","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["privacy","consent","trust","compliance","structured-data","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/privacy').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:privacy check:35","humanCommand":"Confirm privacy, consent, and data usage disclosures are accessible and current; review the structured-data evidence dimension for Privacy and Consent Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-privacy-36","testId":"ni-privacy-36","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Social Preview","description":"Validates Open Graph and Twitter/X card readiness for public sharing for consent patterns, privacy transparency, and user trust controls. Evidence should include meta tag evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Social Preview appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the social preview evidence for privacy and consent integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-privacy-36","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["privacy","consent","trust","compliance","social-preview","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/privacy').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:privacy check:36","humanCommand":"Confirm privacy, consent, and data usage disclosures are accessible and current; review the social-preview evidence dimension for Privacy and Consent Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-privacy-37","testId":"ni-privacy-37","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: I18n Routing","description":"Validates locale route, hreflang, language declaration, and translation readiness for consent patterns, privacy transparency, and user trust controls. Evidence should include lang/hreflang and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: I18n Routing appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the i18n routing evidence for privacy and consent integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-privacy-37","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["privacy","consent","trust","compliance","i18n-routing","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/privacy').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:privacy check:37","humanCommand":"Confirm privacy, consent, and data usage disclosures are accessible and current; review the i18n-routing evidence dimension for Privacy and Consent Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-privacy-38","testId":"ni-privacy-38","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Readability","description":"Validates human readability, sectioning, sentence complexity, and comprehension support for consent patterns, privacy transparency, and user trust controls. Evidence should include extracted content evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Readability appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the readability evidence for privacy and consent integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-privacy-38","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["privacy","consent","trust","compliance","readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/privacy').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:privacy check:38","humanCommand":"Confirm privacy, consent, and data usage disclosures are accessible and current; review the readability evidence dimension for Privacy and Consent Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-privacy-39","testId":"ni-privacy-39","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Content Utility","description":"Validates non-placeholder content usefulness and domain-specific public value for consent patterns, privacy transparency, and user trust controls. Evidence should include content extraction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Content Utility appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the content utility evidence for privacy and consent integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-privacy-39","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["privacy","consent","trust","compliance","content-utility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/privacy').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:privacy check:39","humanCommand":"Confirm privacy, consent, and data usage disclosures are accessible and current; review the content-utility evidence dimension for Privacy and Consent Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-privacy-40","testId":"ni-privacy-40","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Recommendation Grounding","description":"Validates recommendation grounding in deterministic evidence instead of fabricated model output for consent patterns, privacy transparency, and user trust controls. Evidence should include issue and remediation evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Recommendation Grounding appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the recommendation grounding evidence for privacy and consent integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-privacy-40","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["privacy","consent","trust","compliance","recommendation-grounding","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/privacy').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:privacy check:40","humanCommand":"Confirm privacy, consent, and data usage disclosures are accessible and current; review the recommendation-grounding evidence dimension for Privacy and Consent Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-privacy-41","testId":"ni-privacy-41","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Evidence Quality","description":"Validates evidence completeness, public safety, and reproducibility for consent patterns, privacy transparency, and user trust controls. Evidence should include test output and artifact evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Evidence Quality appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the evidence quality evidence for privacy and consent integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-privacy-41","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["privacy","consent","trust","compliance","evidence-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/privacy').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:privacy check:41","humanCommand":"Confirm privacy, consent, and data usage disclosures are accessible and current; review the evidence-quality evidence dimension for Privacy and Consent Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-privacy-42","testId":"ni-privacy-42","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Threshold Policy","description":"Validates threshold clarity, pass/warn/fail semantics, and scoring transparency for consent patterns, privacy transparency, and user trust controls. Evidence should include threshold and result status evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Threshold Policy appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the threshold policy evidence for privacy and consent integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-privacy-42","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["privacy","consent","trust","compliance","threshold-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/privacy').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:privacy check:42","humanCommand":"Confirm privacy, consent, and data usage disclosures are accessible and current; review the threshold-policy evidence dimension for Privacy and Consent Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-privacy-43","testId":"ni-privacy-43","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Confidence","description":"Validates confidence scoring and degraded-input disclosure for consent patterns, privacy transparency, and user trust controls. Evidence should include source freshness and input availability evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Confidence appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the confidence evidence for privacy and consent integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-privacy-43","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["privacy","consent","trust","compliance","confidence","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/privacy').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:privacy check:43","humanCommand":"Confirm privacy, consent, and data usage disclosures are accessible and current; review the confidence evidence dimension for Privacy and Consent Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-privacy-44","testId":"ni-privacy-44","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Trend Readiness","description":"Validates historical comparability and timeline readiness for future reruns for consent patterns, privacy transparency, and user trust controls. Evidence should include analysis ID, timestamp, and persistence evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Trend Readiness appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the trend readiness evidence for privacy and consent integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-privacy-44","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["privacy","consent","trust","compliance","trend-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/privacy').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:privacy check:44","humanCommand":"Confirm privacy, consent, and data usage disclosures are accessible and current; review the trend-readiness evidence dimension for Privacy and Consent Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-privacy-45","testId":"ni-privacy-45","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Ranking Readiness","description":"Validates ranking input completeness and profile compatibility for consent patterns, privacy transparency, and user trust controls. Evidence should include score and profile evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Ranking Readiness appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ranking readiness evidence for privacy and consent integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-privacy-45","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["privacy","consent","trust","compliance","ranking-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/privacy').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:privacy check:45","humanCommand":"Confirm privacy, consent, and data usage disclosures are accessible and current; review the ranking-readiness evidence dimension for Privacy and Consent Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-privacy-46","testId":"ni-privacy-46","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Network Contribution","description":"Validates PlatPhorm network contribution through discovery, integrations, and standards compliance for consent patterns, privacy transparency, and user trust controls. Evidence should include network graph and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Network Contribution appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the network contribution evidence for privacy and consent integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-privacy-46","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["privacy","consent","trust","compliance","network-contribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/privacy').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:privacy check:46","humanCommand":"Confirm privacy, consent, and data usage disclosures are accessible and current; review the network-contribution evidence dimension for Privacy and Consent Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-privacy-47","testId":"ni-privacy-47","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Report Readiness","description":"Validates report/export categorization with public-safe evidence and protected boundaries for consent patterns, privacy transparency, and user trust controls. Evidence should include report section mapping evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Report Readiness appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the report readiness evidence for privacy and consent integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-privacy-47","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["privacy","consent","trust","compliance","report-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/privacy').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:privacy check:47","humanCommand":"Confirm privacy, consent, and data usage disclosures are accessible and current; review the report-readiness evidence dimension for Privacy and Consent Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-privacy-48","testId":"ni-privacy-48","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Operator Actionability","description":"Validates clear remediation, owner action, difficulty, and retest path for consent patterns, privacy transparency, and user trust controls. Evidence should include fix instructions and command evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Operator Actionability appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the operator actionability evidence for privacy and consent integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-privacy-48","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["privacy","consent","trust","compliance","operator-actionability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/privacy').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:privacy check:48","humanCommand":"Confirm privacy, consent, and data usage disclosures are accessible and current; review the operator-actionability evidence dimension for Privacy and Consent Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-privacy-49","testId":"ni-privacy-49","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Degraded State","description":"Validates honest degraded, unavailable, skipped, and not-applicable states for consent patterns, privacy transparency, and user trust controls. Evidence should include status and storage evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Degraded State appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the degraded state evidence for privacy and consent integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-privacy-49","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["privacy","consent","trust","compliance","degraded-state","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/privacy').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:privacy check:49","humanCommand":"Confirm privacy, consent, and data usage disclosures are accessible and current; review the degraded-state evidence dimension for Privacy and Consent Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-privacy-50","testId":"ni-privacy-50","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Reproducibility","description":"Validates stable CLI/API/human reproduction path and deterministic rerun instructions for consent patterns, privacy transparency, and user trust controls. Evidence should include commands and registry version evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Privacy and Consent Integrity: Reproducibility appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the reproducibility evidence for privacy and consent integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-privacy-50","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["privacy","consent","trust","compliance","reproducibility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/privacy').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:privacy check:50","humanCommand":"Confirm privacy, consent, and data usage disclosures are accessible and current; review the reproducibility evidence dimension for Privacy and Consent Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-agent-discovery-01","testId":"ni-agent-discovery-01","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Availability","description":"Validates public route availability and successful bounded fetch behavior for agent discoverability for llm and mcp ecosystems with scored diagnostics. Evidence should include HTTP status, timeout, and redirect evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Availability appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the availability evidence for agent discovery readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-agent-discovery-01","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["agent","discovery","mcp","llm","availability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.all([fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json')]).then(rs=>console.log(rs.map(r=>r.status).join(',')))\" # group:agent-discovery check:1","humanCommand":"Check that llm and mcp discovery endpoints are reachable and coherent; review the availability evidence dimension for Agent Discovery Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-agent-discovery-02","testId":"ni-agent-discovery-02","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Public Safety","description":"Validates public-safe access boundaries without exposing private or protected data for agent discoverability for llm and mcp ecosystems with scored diagnostics. Evidence should include route policy and response-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Public Safety appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the public safety evidence for agent discovery readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-agent-discovery-02","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["agent","discovery","mcp","llm","public-safety","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.all([fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json')]).then(rs=>console.log(rs.map(r=>r.status).join(',')))\" # group:agent-discovery check:2","humanCommand":"Check that llm and mcp discovery endpoints are reachable and coherent; review the public-safety evidence dimension for Agent Discovery Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-agent-discovery-03","testId":"ni-agent-discovery-03","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Canonical Url","description":"Validates canonical URL stability and normalized route identity for agent discoverability for llm and mcp ecosystems with scored diagnostics. Evidence should include canonical tags, redirects, and normalized URL evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Canonical Url appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the canonical url evidence for agent discovery readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-agent-discovery-03","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["agent","discovery","mcp","llm","canonical-url","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.all([fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json')]).then(rs=>console.log(rs.map(r=>r.status).join(',')))\" # group:agent-discovery check:3","humanCommand":"Check that llm and mcp discovery endpoints are reachable and coherent; review the canonical-url evidence dimension for Agent Discovery Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-agent-discovery-04","testId":"ni-agent-discovery-04","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Metadata Clarity","description":"Validates title, description, and page-specific metadata clarity for agent discoverability for llm and mcp ecosystems with scored diagnostics. Evidence should include HTML metadata and extracted text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Metadata Clarity appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the metadata clarity evidence for agent discovery readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-agent-discovery-04","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["agent","discovery","mcp","llm","metadata-clarity","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.all([fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json')]).then(rs=>console.log(rs.map(r=>r.status).join(',')))\" # group:agent-discovery check:4","humanCommand":"Check that llm and mcp discovery endpoints are reachable and coherent; review the metadata-clarity evidence dimension for Agent Discovery Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-agent-discovery-05","testId":"ni-agent-discovery-05","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Semantic Structure","description":"Validates semantic HTML structure for humans, agents, and assistive technology for agent discoverability for llm and mcp ecosystems with scored diagnostics. Evidence should include heading, landmark, and element evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Semantic Structure appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the semantic structure evidence for agent discovery readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-agent-discovery-05","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["agent","discovery","mcp","llm","semantic-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.all([fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json')]).then(rs=>console.log(rs.map(r=>r.status).join(',')))\" # group:agent-discovery check:5","humanCommand":"Check that llm and mcp discovery endpoints are reachable and coherent; review the semantic-structure evidence dimension for Agent Discovery Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-agent-discovery-06","testId":"ni-agent-discovery-06","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Machine Readability","description":"Validates machine-readable public content and predictable parsing surfaces for agent discoverability for llm and mcp ecosystems with scored diagnostics. Evidence should include structured tags, JSON-LD, and document-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Machine Readability appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the machine readability evidence for agent discovery readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-agent-discovery-06","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["agent","discovery","mcp","llm","machine-readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.all([fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json')]).then(rs=>console.log(rs.map(r=>r.status).join(',')))\" # group:agent-discovery check:6","humanCommand":"Check that llm and mcp discovery endpoints are reachable and coherent; review the machine-readability evidence dimension for Agent Discovery Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-agent-discovery-07","testId":"ni-agent-discovery-07","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Agent Discovery","description":"Validates agent discovery hints and AI-readable policy/documentation signals for agent discoverability for llm and mcp ecosystems with scored diagnostics. Evidence should include llms, policy, MCP, OpenAPI, or schema evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Agent Discovery appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the agent discovery evidence for agent discovery readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-agent-discovery-07","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["agent","discovery","mcp","llm","agent-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.all([fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json')]).then(rs=>console.log(rs.map(r=>r.status).join(',')))\" # group:agent-discovery check:7","humanCommand":"Check that llm and mcp discovery endpoints are reachable and coherent; review the agent-discovery evidence dimension for Agent Discovery Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-agent-discovery-08","testId":"ni-agent-discovery-08","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Crawler Discovery","description":"Validates crawler discovery paths through robots, sitemap, feeds, and canonical links for agent discoverability for llm and mcp ecosystems with scored diagnostics. Evidence should include discovery artifact and link evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Crawler Discovery appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the crawler discovery evidence for agent discovery readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-agent-discovery-08","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["agent","discovery","mcp","llm","crawler-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.all([fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json')]).then(rs=>console.log(rs.map(r=>r.status).join(',')))\" # group:agent-discovery check:8","humanCommand":"Check that llm and mcp discovery endpoints are reachable and coherent; review the crawler-discovery evidence dimension for Agent Discovery Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-agent-discovery-09","testId":"ni-agent-discovery-09","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Answerability","description":"Validates direct answer extraction and quotable explanatory content for agent discoverability for llm and mcp ecosystems with scored diagnostics. Evidence should include question, summary, heading, and paragraph evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Answerability appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the answerability evidence for agent discovery readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-agent-discovery-09","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["agent","discovery","mcp","llm","answerability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.all([fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json')]).then(rs=>console.log(rs.map(r=>r.status).join(',')))\" # group:agent-discovery check:9","humanCommand":"Check that llm and mcp discovery endpoints are reachable and coherent; review the answerability evidence dimension for Agent Discovery Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-agent-discovery-10","testId":"ni-agent-discovery-10","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Generative Context","description":"Validates GEO context quality for generative engines without inventing measured facts for agent discoverability for llm and mcp ecosystems with scored diagnostics. Evidence should include entity, source, and instruction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Generative Context appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the generative context evidence for agent discovery readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-agent-discovery-10","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["agent","discovery","mcp","llm","generative-context","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.all([fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json')]).then(rs=>console.log(rs.map(r=>r.status).join(',')))\" # group:agent-discovery check:10","humanCommand":"Check that llm and mcp discovery endpoints are reachable and coherent; review the generative-context evidence dimension for Agent Discovery Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-agent-discovery-11","testId":"ni-agent-discovery-11","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Search Intent","description":"Validates search intent alignment and snippet-friendly content structure for agent discoverability for llm and mcp ecosystems with scored diagnostics. Evidence should include metadata, headings, and topical text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Search Intent appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the search intent evidence for agent discovery readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-agent-discovery-11","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["agent","discovery","mcp","llm","search-intent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.all([fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json')]).then(rs=>console.log(rs.map(r=>r.status).join(',')))\" # group:agent-discovery check:11","humanCommand":"Check that llm and mcp discovery endpoints are reachable and coherent; review the search-intent evidence dimension for Agent Discovery Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-agent-discovery-12","testId":"ni-agent-discovery-12","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Accessibility Semantics","description":"Validates accessible names, relationships, landmarks, and keyboard-relevant structure for agent discoverability for llm and mcp ecosystems with scored diagnostics. Evidence should include ARIA, labels, landmarks, and control evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Accessibility Semantics appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the accessibility semantics evidence for agent discovery readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-agent-discovery-12","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["agent","discovery","mcp","llm","accessibility-semantics","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.all([fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json')]).then(rs=>console.log(rs.map(r=>r.status).join(',')))\" # group:agent-discovery check:12","humanCommand":"Check that llm and mcp discovery endpoints are reachable and coherent; review the accessibility-semantics evidence dimension for Agent Discovery Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-agent-discovery-13","testId":"ni-agent-discovery-13","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Mobile Readiness","description":"Validates mobile viewport, responsive content, and touch-friendly layout signals for agent discoverability for llm and mcp ecosystems with scored diagnostics. Evidence should include viewport and responsive asset evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Mobile Readiness appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the mobile readiness evidence for agent discovery readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-agent-discovery-13","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["agent","discovery","mcp","llm","mobile-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.all([fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json')]).then(rs=>console.log(rs.map(r=>r.status).join(',')))\" # group:agent-discovery check:13","humanCommand":"Check that llm and mcp discovery endpoints are reachable and coherent; review the mobile-readiness evidence dimension for Agent Discovery Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-agent-discovery-14","testId":"ni-agent-discovery-14","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Performance Budget","description":"Validates performance budget compliance using measured or bounded deterministic inputs for agent discoverability for llm and mcp ecosystems with scored diagnostics. Evidence should include timing, byte, and Lighthouse-derived evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Performance Budget appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the performance budget evidence for agent discovery readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-agent-discovery-14","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["agent","discovery","mcp","llm","performance-budget","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.all([fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json')]).then(rs=>console.log(rs.map(r=>r.status).join(',')))\" # group:agent-discovery check:14","humanCommand":"Check that llm and mcp discovery endpoints are reachable and coherent; review the performance-budget evidence dimension for Agent Discovery Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-agent-discovery-15","testId":"ni-agent-discovery-15","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Resource Efficiency","description":"Validates resource size, script/style count, and optimization opportunity signals for agent discoverability for llm and mcp ecosystems with scored diagnostics. Evidence should include resource and markup evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Resource Efficiency appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the resource efficiency evidence for agent discovery readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-agent-discovery-15","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["agent","discovery","mcp","llm","resource-efficiency","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.all([fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json')]).then(rs=>console.log(rs.map(r=>r.status).join(',')))\" # group:agent-discovery check:15","humanCommand":"Check that llm and mcp discovery endpoints are reachable and coherent; review the resource-efficiency evidence dimension for Agent Discovery Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-agent-discovery-16","testId":"ni-agent-discovery-16","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Cache Freshness","description":"Validates cache behavior, freshness hints, and stale-content risk for agent discoverability for llm and mcp ecosystems with scored diagnostics. Evidence should include HTTP cache and timestamp evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Cache Freshness appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the cache freshness evidence for agent discovery readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-agent-discovery-16","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["agent","discovery","mcp","llm","cache-freshness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.all([fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json')]).then(rs=>console.log(rs.map(r=>r.status).join(',')))\" # group:agent-discovery check:16","humanCommand":"Check that llm and mcp discovery endpoints are reachable and coherent; review the cache-freshness evidence dimension for Agent Discovery Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-agent-discovery-17","testId":"ni-agent-discovery-17","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Route Reliability","description":"Validates route reliability, redirect safety, and dead-link risk for agent discoverability for llm and mcp ecosystems with scored diagnostics. Evidence should include status, redirect, and sitemap evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Route Reliability appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the route reliability evidence for agent discovery readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-agent-discovery-17","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["agent","discovery","mcp","llm","route-reliability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.all([fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json')]).then(rs=>console.log(rs.map(r=>r.status).join(',')))\" # group:agent-discovery check:17","humanCommand":"Check that llm and mcp discovery endpoints are reachable and coherent; review the route-reliability evidence dimension for Agent Discovery Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-agent-discovery-18","testId":"ni-agent-discovery-18","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Feed Quality","description":"Validates RSS/Atom/feed usefulness, parseability, and freshness for agent discoverability for llm and mcp ecosystems with scored diagnostics. Evidence should include feed XML and item evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Feed Quality appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the feed quality evidence for agent discovery readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-agent-discovery-18","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["agent","discovery","mcp","llm","feed-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.all([fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json')]).then(rs=>console.log(rs.map(r=>r.status).join(',')))\" # group:agent-discovery check:18","humanCommand":"Check that llm and mcp discovery endpoints are reachable and coherent; review the feed-quality evidence dimension for Agent Discovery Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-agent-discovery-19","testId":"ni-agent-discovery-19","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Sitemap Quality","description":"Validates sitemap validity, public-safe URL coverage, and no-dead-link policy for agent discoverability for llm and mcp ecosystems with scored diagnostics. Evidence should include sitemap XML and bounded link-check evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Sitemap Quality appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the sitemap quality evidence for agent discovery readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-agent-discovery-19","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["agent","discovery","mcp","llm","sitemap-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.all([fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json')]).then(rs=>console.log(rs.map(r=>r.status).join(',')))\" # group:agent-discovery check:19","humanCommand":"Check that llm and mcp discovery endpoints are reachable and coherent; review the sitemap-quality evidence dimension for Agent Discovery Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-agent-discovery-20","testId":"ni-agent-discovery-20","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Robots Alignment","description":"Validates robots.txt alignment with public/protected policy and sitemap discovery for agent discoverability for llm and mcp ecosystems with scored diagnostics. Evidence should include robots directives and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Robots Alignment appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the robots alignment evidence for agent discovery readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-agent-discovery-20","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["agent","discovery","mcp","llm","robots-alignment","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.all([fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json')]).then(rs=>console.log(rs.map(r=>r.status).join(',')))\" # group:agent-discovery check:20","humanCommand":"Check that llm and mcp discovery endpoints are reachable and coherent; review the robots-alignment evidence dimension for Agent Discovery Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-agent-discovery-21","testId":"ni-agent-discovery-21","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Llms Structure","description":"Validates llms.txt structure, readability, endpoint coverage, and agent usefulness for agent discoverability for llm and mcp ecosystems with scored diagnostics. Evidence should include plain-text section and line-length evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Llms Structure appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms structure evidence for agent discovery readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-agent-discovery-21","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["agent","discovery","mcp","llm","llms-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.all([fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json')]).then(rs=>console.log(rs.map(r=>r.status).join(',')))\" # group:agent-discovery check:21","humanCommand":"Check that llm and mcp discovery endpoints are reachable and coherent; review the llms-structure evidence dimension for Agent Discovery Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-agent-discovery-22","testId":"ni-agent-discovery-22","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Llms Index Schema","description":"Validates llms-index JSON schema shape and count reconciliation for agent discoverability for llm and mcp ecosystems with scored diagnostics. Evidence should include JSON keys, counts, and endpoint evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Llms Index Schema appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms index schema evidence for agent discovery readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-agent-discovery-22","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["agent","discovery","mcp","llm","llms-index-schema","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.all([fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json')]).then(rs=>console.log(rs.map(r=>r.status).join(',')))\" # group:agent-discovery check:22","humanCommand":"Check that llm and mcp discovery endpoints are reachable and coherent; review the llms-index-schema evidence dimension for Agent Discovery Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-agent-discovery-23","testId":"ni-agent-discovery-23","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Humans Attribution","description":"Validates humans.txt attribution, maintainer, technology, and governance transparency for agent discoverability for llm and mcp ecosystems with scored diagnostics. Evidence should include humans.txt section evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Humans Attribution appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the humans attribution evidence for agent discovery readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-agent-discovery-23","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["agent","discovery","mcp","llm","humans-attribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.all([fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json')]).then(rs=>console.log(rs.map(r=>r.status).join(',')))\" # group:agent-discovery check:23","humanCommand":"Check that llm and mcp discovery endpoints are reachable and coherent; review the humans-attribution evidence dimension for Agent Discovery Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-agent-discovery-24","testId":"ni-agent-discovery-24","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Agent Policy","description":"Validates agent-policy JSON clarity for allowed, disallowed, and protected operations for agent discoverability for llm and mcp ecosystems with scored diagnostics. Evidence should include well-known policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Agent Policy appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the agent policy evidence for agent discovery readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-agent-discovery-24","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["agent","discovery","mcp","llm","agent-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.all([fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json')]).then(rs=>console.log(rs.map(r=>r.status).join(',')))\" # group:agent-discovery check:24","humanCommand":"Check that llm and mcp discovery endpoints are reachable and coherent; review the agent-policy evidence dimension for Agent Discovery Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-agent-discovery-25","testId":"ni-agent-discovery-25","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Ai Policy","description":"Validates AI policy clarity for training, search, answer use, caching, and attribution for agent discoverability for llm and mcp ecosystems with scored diagnostics. Evidence should include well-known AI policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Ai Policy appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ai policy evidence for agent discovery readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-agent-discovery-25","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["agent","discovery","mcp","llm","ai-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.all([fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json')]).then(rs=>console.log(rs.map(r=>r.status).join(',')))\" # group:agent-discovery check:25","humanCommand":"Check that llm and mcp discovery endpoints are reachable and coherent; review the ai-policy evidence dimension for Agent Discovery Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-agent-discovery-26","testId":"ni-agent-discovery-26","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Trust Policy","description":"Validates trust policy coverage for privacy, traceability, metadata, and protected actions for agent discoverability for llm and mcp ecosystems with scored diagnostics. Evidence should include trust.json evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Trust Policy appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the trust policy evidence for agent discovery readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-agent-discovery-26","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["agent","discovery","mcp","llm","trust-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.all([fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json')]).then(rs=>console.log(rs.map(r=>r.status).join(',')))\" # group:agent-discovery check:26","humanCommand":"Check that llm and mcp discovery endpoints are reachable and coherent; review the trust-policy evidence dimension for Agent Discovery Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-agent-discovery-27","testId":"ni-agent-discovery-27","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Openapi Contract","description":"Validates OpenAPI availability, server URL accuracy, schemas, and auth policy for agent discoverability for llm and mcp ecosystems with scored diagnostics. Evidence should include OpenAPI text/JSON evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Openapi Contract appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the openapi contract evidence for agent discovery readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-agent-discovery-27","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["agent","discovery","mcp","llm","openapi-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.all([fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json')]).then(rs=>console.log(rs.map(r=>r.status).join(',')))\" # group:agent-discovery check:27","humanCommand":"Check that llm and mcp discovery endpoints are reachable and coherent; review the openapi-contract evidence dimension for Agent Discovery Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-agent-discovery-28","testId":"ni-agent-discovery-28","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Mcp Contract","description":"Validates MCP JSON-RPC introspection, real tools, resources, and protected boundaries for agent discoverability for llm and mcp ecosystems with scored diagnostics. Evidence should include MCP manifest and initialize evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Mcp Contract appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the mcp contract evidence for agent discovery readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-agent-discovery-28","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["agent","discovery","mcp","llm","mcp-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.all([fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json')]).then(rs=>console.log(rs.map(r=>r.status).join(',')))\" # group:agent-discovery check:28","humanCommand":"Check that llm and mcp discovery endpoints are reachable and coherent; review the mcp-contract evidence dimension for Agent Discovery Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-agent-discovery-29","testId":"ni-agent-discovery-29","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Api Error Shape","description":"Validates API success/error response shape consistency for agent discoverability for llm and mcp ecosystems with scored diagnostics. Evidence should include REST envelope evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Api Error Shape appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the api error shape evidence for agent discovery readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-agent-discovery-29","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["agent","discovery","mcp","llm","api-error-shape","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.all([fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json')]).then(rs=>console.log(rs.map(r=>r.status).join(',')))\" # group:agent-discovery check:29","humanCommand":"Check that llm and mcp discovery endpoints are reachable and coherent; review the api-error-shape evidence dimension for Agent Discovery Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-agent-discovery-30","testId":"ni-agent-discovery-30","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Traceability","description":"Validates trace propagation, request IDs, and safe observability correlation for agent discoverability for llm and mcp ecosystems with scored diagnostics. Evidence should include trace header and metadata evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Traceability appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the traceability evidence for agent discovery readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-agent-discovery-30","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["agent","discovery","mcp","llm","traceability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.all([fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json')]).then(rs=>console.log(rs.map(r=>r.status).join(',')))\" # group:agent-discovery check:30","humanCommand":"Check that llm and mcp discovery endpoints are reachable and coherent; review the traceability evidence dimension for Agent Discovery Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-agent-discovery-31","testId":"ni-agent-discovery-31","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Ja4 Redaction","description":"Validates fingerprint-adjacent metadata redaction and non-public raw JA4 handling for agent discoverability for llm and mcp ecosystems with scored diagnostics. Evidence should include metadata policy and redaction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Ja4 Redaction appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the ja4 redaction evidence for agent discovery readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-agent-discovery-31","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["agent","discovery","mcp","llm","ja4-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.all([fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json')]).then(rs=>console.log(rs.map(r=>r.status).join(',')))\" # group:agent-discovery check:31","humanCommand":"Check that llm and mcp discovery endpoints are reachable and coherent; review the ja4-redaction evidence dimension for Agent Discovery Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-agent-discovery-32","testId":"ni-agent-discovery-32","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Secret Redaction","description":"Validates absence of secrets, generic key examples, cookies, and raw tokens in public outputs for agent discoverability for llm and mcp ecosystems with scored diagnostics. Evidence should include public artifact scan evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Secret Redaction appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the secret redaction evidence for agent discovery readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-agent-discovery-32","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["agent","discovery","mcp","llm","secret-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.all([fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json')]).then(rs=>console.log(rs.map(r=>r.status).join(',')))\" # group:agent-discovery check:32","humanCommand":"Check that llm and mcp discovery endpoints are reachable and coherent; review the secret-redaction evidence dimension for Agent Discovery Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-agent-discovery-33","testId":"ni-agent-discovery-33","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Security Headers","description":"Validates security header coverage and hardened transport signals for agent discoverability for llm and mcp ecosystems with scored diagnostics. Evidence should include HTTP header evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Security Headers appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the security headers evidence for agent discovery readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-agent-discovery-33","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["agent","discovery","mcp","llm","security-headers","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.all([fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json')]).then(rs=>console.log(rs.map(r=>r.status).join(',')))\" # group:agent-discovery check:33","humanCommand":"Check that llm and mcp discovery endpoints are reachable and coherent; review the security-headers evidence dimension for Agent Discovery Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-agent-discovery-34","testId":"ni-agent-discovery-34","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Privacy Consent","description":"Validates privacy policy, consent, attribution, and data-use disclosure quality for agent discoverability for llm and mcp ecosystems with scored diagnostics. Evidence should include public page and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Privacy Consent appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the privacy consent evidence for agent discovery readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-agent-discovery-34","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["agent","discovery","mcp","llm","privacy-consent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.all([fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json')]).then(rs=>console.log(rs.map(r=>r.status).join(',')))\" # group:agent-discovery check:34","humanCommand":"Check that llm and mcp discovery endpoints are reachable and coherent; review the privacy-consent evidence dimension for Agent Discovery Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-agent-discovery-35","testId":"ni-agent-discovery-35","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Structured Data","description":"Validates JSON-LD and entity modeling for machine interpretation for agent discoverability for llm and mcp ecosystems with scored diagnostics. Evidence should include schema block and parse evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Structured Data appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the structured data evidence for agent discovery readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-agent-discovery-35","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["agent","discovery","mcp","llm","structured-data","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.all([fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json')]).then(rs=>console.log(rs.map(r=>r.status).join(',')))\" # group:agent-discovery check:35","humanCommand":"Check that llm and mcp discovery endpoints are reachable and coherent; review the structured-data evidence dimension for Agent Discovery Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-agent-discovery-36","testId":"ni-agent-discovery-36","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Social Preview","description":"Validates Open Graph and Twitter/X card readiness for public sharing for agent discoverability for llm and mcp ecosystems with scored diagnostics. Evidence should include meta tag evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Social Preview appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the social preview evidence for agent discovery readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-agent-discovery-36","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["agent","discovery","mcp","llm","social-preview","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.all([fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json')]).then(rs=>console.log(rs.map(r=>r.status).join(',')))\" # group:agent-discovery check:36","humanCommand":"Check that llm and mcp discovery endpoints are reachable and coherent; review the social-preview evidence dimension for Agent Discovery Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-agent-discovery-37","testId":"ni-agent-discovery-37","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Agent Discovery Readiness: I18n Routing","description":"Validates locale route, hreflang, language declaration, and translation readiness for agent discoverability for llm and mcp ecosystems with scored diagnostics. Evidence should include lang/hreflang and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"Agent Discovery Readiness: I18n Routing appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the i18n routing evidence for agent discovery readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-agent-discovery-37","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["agent","discovery","mcp","llm","i18n-routing","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.all([fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json')]).then(rs=>console.log(rs.map(r=>r.status).join(',')))\" # group:agent-discovery check:37","humanCommand":"Check that llm and mcp discovery endpoints are reachable and coherent; review the i18n-routing evidence dimension for Agent Discovery Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-agent-discovery-38","testId":"ni-agent-discovery-38","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Readability","description":"Validates human readability, sectioning, sentence complexity, and comprehension support for agent discoverability for llm and mcp ecosystems with scored diagnostics. Evidence should include extracted content evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Readability appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the readability evidence for agent discovery readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-agent-discovery-38","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["agent","discovery","mcp","llm","readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.all([fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json')]).then(rs=>console.log(rs.map(r=>r.status).join(',')))\" # group:agent-discovery check:38","humanCommand":"Check that llm and mcp discovery endpoints are reachable and coherent; review the readability evidence dimension for Agent Discovery Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-agent-discovery-39","testId":"ni-agent-discovery-39","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Content Utility","description":"Validates non-placeholder content usefulness and domain-specific public value for agent discoverability for llm and mcp ecosystems with scored diagnostics. Evidence should include content extraction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Content Utility appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the content utility evidence for agent discovery readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-agent-discovery-39","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["agent","discovery","mcp","llm","content-utility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.all([fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json')]).then(rs=>console.log(rs.map(r=>r.status).join(',')))\" # group:agent-discovery check:39","humanCommand":"Check that llm and mcp discovery endpoints are reachable and coherent; review the content-utility evidence dimension for Agent Discovery Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-agent-discovery-40","testId":"ni-agent-discovery-40","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Recommendation Grounding","description":"Validates recommendation grounding in deterministic evidence instead of fabricated model output for agent discoverability for llm and mcp ecosystems with scored diagnostics. Evidence should include issue and remediation evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Recommendation Grounding appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the recommendation grounding evidence for agent discovery readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-agent-discovery-40","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["agent","discovery","mcp","llm","recommendation-grounding","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.all([fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json')]).then(rs=>console.log(rs.map(r=>r.status).join(',')))\" # group:agent-discovery check:40","humanCommand":"Check that llm and mcp discovery endpoints are reachable and coherent; review the recommendation-grounding evidence dimension for Agent Discovery Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-agent-discovery-41","testId":"ni-agent-discovery-41","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Evidence Quality","description":"Validates evidence completeness, public safety, and reproducibility for agent discoverability for llm and mcp ecosystems with scored diagnostics. Evidence should include test output and artifact evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Evidence Quality appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the evidence quality evidence for agent discovery readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-agent-discovery-41","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["agent","discovery","mcp","llm","evidence-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.all([fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json')]).then(rs=>console.log(rs.map(r=>r.status).join(',')))\" # group:agent-discovery check:41","humanCommand":"Check that llm and mcp discovery endpoints are reachable and coherent; review the evidence-quality evidence dimension for Agent Discovery Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-agent-discovery-42","testId":"ni-agent-discovery-42","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Threshold Policy","description":"Validates threshold clarity, pass/warn/fail semantics, and scoring transparency for agent discoverability for llm and mcp ecosystems with scored diagnostics. Evidence should include threshold and result status evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Threshold Policy appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the threshold policy evidence for agent discovery readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-agent-discovery-42","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["agent","discovery","mcp","llm","threshold-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.all([fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json')]).then(rs=>console.log(rs.map(r=>r.status).join(',')))\" # group:agent-discovery check:42","humanCommand":"Check that llm and mcp discovery endpoints are reachable and coherent; review the threshold-policy evidence dimension for Agent Discovery Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-agent-discovery-43","testId":"ni-agent-discovery-43","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Confidence","description":"Validates confidence scoring and degraded-input disclosure for agent discoverability for llm and mcp ecosystems with scored diagnostics. Evidence should include source freshness and input availability evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Confidence appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the confidence evidence for agent discovery readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-agent-discovery-43","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["agent","discovery","mcp","llm","confidence","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.all([fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json')]).then(rs=>console.log(rs.map(r=>r.status).join(',')))\" # group:agent-discovery check:43","humanCommand":"Check that llm and mcp discovery endpoints are reachable and coherent; review the confidence evidence dimension for Agent Discovery Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-agent-discovery-44","testId":"ni-agent-discovery-44","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Trend Readiness","description":"Validates historical comparability and timeline readiness for future reruns for agent discoverability for llm and mcp ecosystems with scored diagnostics. Evidence should include analysis ID, timestamp, and persistence evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Trend Readiness appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the trend readiness evidence for agent discovery readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-agent-discovery-44","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["agent","discovery","mcp","llm","trend-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.all([fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json')]).then(rs=>console.log(rs.map(r=>r.status).join(',')))\" # group:agent-discovery check:44","humanCommand":"Check that llm and mcp discovery endpoints are reachable and coherent; review the trend-readiness evidence dimension for Agent Discovery Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-agent-discovery-45","testId":"ni-agent-discovery-45","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Ranking Readiness","description":"Validates ranking input completeness and profile compatibility for agent discoverability for llm and mcp ecosystems with scored diagnostics. Evidence should include score and profile evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Ranking Readiness appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ranking readiness evidence for agent discovery readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-agent-discovery-45","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["agent","discovery","mcp","llm","ranking-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.all([fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json')]).then(rs=>console.log(rs.map(r=>r.status).join(',')))\" # group:agent-discovery check:45","humanCommand":"Check that llm and mcp discovery endpoints are reachable and coherent; review the ranking-readiness evidence dimension for Agent Discovery Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-agent-discovery-46","testId":"ni-agent-discovery-46","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Network Contribution","description":"Validates PlatPhorm network contribution through discovery, integrations, and standards compliance for agent discoverability for llm and mcp ecosystems with scored diagnostics. Evidence should include network graph and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Network Contribution appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the network contribution evidence for agent discovery readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-agent-discovery-46","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["agent","discovery","mcp","llm","network-contribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.all([fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json')]).then(rs=>console.log(rs.map(r=>r.status).join(',')))\" # group:agent-discovery check:46","humanCommand":"Check that llm and mcp discovery endpoints are reachable and coherent; review the network-contribution evidence dimension for Agent Discovery Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-agent-discovery-47","testId":"ni-agent-discovery-47","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Report Readiness","description":"Validates report/export categorization with public-safe evidence and protected boundaries for agent discoverability for llm and mcp ecosystems with scored diagnostics. Evidence should include report section mapping evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Report Readiness appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the report readiness evidence for agent discovery readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-agent-discovery-47","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["agent","discovery","mcp","llm","report-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.all([fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json')]).then(rs=>console.log(rs.map(r=>r.status).join(',')))\" # group:agent-discovery check:47","humanCommand":"Check that llm and mcp discovery endpoints are reachable and coherent; review the report-readiness evidence dimension for Agent Discovery Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-agent-discovery-48","testId":"ni-agent-discovery-48","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Operator Actionability","description":"Validates clear remediation, owner action, difficulty, and retest path for agent discoverability for llm and mcp ecosystems with scored diagnostics. Evidence should include fix instructions and command evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Operator Actionability appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the operator actionability evidence for agent discovery readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-agent-discovery-48","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["agent","discovery","mcp","llm","operator-actionability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.all([fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json')]).then(rs=>console.log(rs.map(r=>r.status).join(',')))\" # group:agent-discovery check:48","humanCommand":"Check that llm and mcp discovery endpoints are reachable and coherent; review the operator-actionability evidence dimension for Agent Discovery Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-agent-discovery-49","testId":"ni-agent-discovery-49","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Degraded State","description":"Validates honest degraded, unavailable, skipped, and not-applicable states for agent discoverability for llm and mcp ecosystems with scored diagnostics. Evidence should include status and storage evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Degraded State appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the degraded state evidence for agent discovery readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-agent-discovery-49","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["agent","discovery","mcp","llm","degraded-state","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.all([fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json')]).then(rs=>console.log(rs.map(r=>r.status).join(',')))\" # group:agent-discovery check:49","humanCommand":"Check that llm and mcp discovery endpoints are reachable and coherent; review the degraded-state evidence dimension for Agent Discovery Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-agent-discovery-50","testId":"ni-agent-discovery-50","suiteId":"ai-readiness","suiteName":"AI Readiness","phase2Dimensions":["aeo","geo","mcp-api","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Reproducibility","description":"Validates stable CLI/API/human reproduction path and deterministic rerun instructions for agent discoverability for llm and mcp ecosystems with scored diagnostics. Evidence should include commands and registry version evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"model_assisted_available","reportSectionId":"agent-api-mcp-readiness","reportSectionName":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness","reportingCategory":"Agent, API, and MCP Readiness / AI Readiness","evidenceType":"model_assisted_available","publicReadout":"Agent Discovery Readiness: Reproducibility appears in the Agent, API, and MCP Readiness report section with model assisted available evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the reproducibility evidence for agent discovery readiness, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-agent-discovery-50","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["agent","discovery","mcp","llm","reproducibility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"Promise.all([fetch('https://example.com/llms.txt'),fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/mcp.json')]).then(rs=>console.log(rs.map(r=>r.status).join(',')))\" # group:agent-discovery check:50","humanCommand":"Check that llm and mcp discovery endpoints are reachable and coherent; review the reproducibility evidence dimension for Agent Discovery Readiness"}},{"id":"ni-attribution-01","testId":"ni-attribution-01","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Availability","description":"Validates public route availability and successful bounded fetch behavior for authorship clarity, origin traceability, and human oversight declarations. Evidence should include HTTP status, timeout, and redirect evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Availability appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the availability evidence for attribution and identity signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-attribution-01","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["attribution","identity","traceability","humans.txt","availability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:attribution check:1","humanCommand":"Verify authorship and ownership statements across key public documents; review the availability evidence dimension for Attribution and Identity Signals"}},{"id":"ni-attribution-02","testId":"ni-attribution-02","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Public Safety","description":"Validates public-safe access boundaries without exposing private or protected data for authorship clarity, origin traceability, and human oversight declarations. Evidence should include route policy and response-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Public Safety appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the public safety evidence for attribution and identity signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-attribution-02","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["attribution","identity","traceability","humans.txt","public-safety","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:attribution check:2","humanCommand":"Verify authorship and ownership statements across key public documents; review the public-safety evidence dimension for Attribution and Identity Signals"}},{"id":"ni-attribution-03","testId":"ni-attribution-03","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Canonical Url","description":"Validates canonical URL stability and normalized route identity for authorship clarity, origin traceability, and human oversight declarations. Evidence should include canonical tags, redirects, and normalized URL evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Canonical Url appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the canonical url evidence for attribution and identity signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-attribution-03","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["attribution","identity","traceability","humans.txt","canonical-url","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:attribution check:3","humanCommand":"Verify authorship and ownership statements across key public documents; review the canonical-url evidence dimension for Attribution and Identity Signals"}},{"id":"ni-attribution-04","testId":"ni-attribution-04","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Metadata Clarity","description":"Validates title, description, and page-specific metadata clarity for authorship clarity, origin traceability, and human oversight declarations. Evidence should include HTML metadata and extracted text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Metadata Clarity appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the metadata clarity evidence for attribution and identity signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-attribution-04","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["attribution","identity","traceability","humans.txt","metadata-clarity","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:attribution check:4","humanCommand":"Verify authorship and ownership statements across key public documents; review the metadata-clarity evidence dimension for Attribution and Identity Signals"}},{"id":"ni-attribution-05","testId":"ni-attribution-05","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Semantic Structure","description":"Validates semantic HTML structure for humans, agents, and assistive technology for authorship clarity, origin traceability, and human oversight declarations. Evidence should include heading, landmark, and element evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Semantic Structure appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the semantic structure evidence for attribution and identity signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-attribution-05","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["attribution","identity","traceability","humans.txt","semantic-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:attribution check:5","humanCommand":"Verify authorship and ownership statements across key public documents; review the semantic-structure evidence dimension for Attribution and Identity Signals"}},{"id":"ni-attribution-06","testId":"ni-attribution-06","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Machine Readability","description":"Validates machine-readable public content and predictable parsing surfaces for authorship clarity, origin traceability, and human oversight declarations. Evidence should include structured tags, JSON-LD, and document-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Machine Readability appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the machine readability evidence for attribution and identity signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-attribution-06","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["attribution","identity","traceability","humans.txt","machine-readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:attribution check:6","humanCommand":"Verify authorship and ownership statements across key public documents; review the machine-readability evidence dimension for Attribution and Identity Signals"}},{"id":"ni-attribution-07","testId":"ni-attribution-07","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Agent Discovery","description":"Validates agent discovery hints and AI-readable policy/documentation signals for authorship clarity, origin traceability, and human oversight declarations. Evidence should include llms, policy, MCP, OpenAPI, or schema evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Agent Discovery appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the agent discovery evidence for attribution and identity signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-attribution-07","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["attribution","identity","traceability","humans.txt","agent-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:attribution check:7","humanCommand":"Verify authorship and ownership statements across key public documents; review the agent-discovery evidence dimension for Attribution and Identity Signals"}},{"id":"ni-attribution-08","testId":"ni-attribution-08","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Crawler Discovery","description":"Validates crawler discovery paths through robots, sitemap, feeds, and canonical links for authorship clarity, origin traceability, and human oversight declarations. Evidence should include discovery artifact and link evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Crawler Discovery appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the crawler discovery evidence for attribution and identity signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-attribution-08","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["attribution","identity","traceability","humans.txt","crawler-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:attribution check:8","humanCommand":"Verify authorship and ownership statements across key public documents; review the crawler-discovery evidence dimension for Attribution and Identity Signals"}},{"id":"ni-attribution-09","testId":"ni-attribution-09","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Answerability","description":"Validates direct answer extraction and quotable explanatory content for authorship clarity, origin traceability, and human oversight declarations. Evidence should include question, summary, heading, and paragraph evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Answerability appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the answerability evidence for attribution and identity signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-attribution-09","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["attribution","identity","traceability","humans.txt","answerability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:attribution check:9","humanCommand":"Verify authorship and ownership statements across key public documents; review the answerability evidence dimension for Attribution and Identity Signals"}},{"id":"ni-attribution-10","testId":"ni-attribution-10","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Generative Context","description":"Validates GEO context quality for generative engines without inventing measured facts for authorship clarity, origin traceability, and human oversight declarations. Evidence should include entity, source, and instruction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Generative Context appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the generative context evidence for attribution and identity signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-attribution-10","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["attribution","identity","traceability","humans.txt","generative-context","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:attribution check:10","humanCommand":"Verify authorship and ownership statements across key public documents; review the generative-context evidence dimension for Attribution and Identity Signals"}},{"id":"ni-attribution-11","testId":"ni-attribution-11","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Search Intent","description":"Validates search intent alignment and snippet-friendly content structure for authorship clarity, origin traceability, and human oversight declarations. Evidence should include metadata, headings, and topical text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Search Intent appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the search intent evidence for attribution and identity signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-attribution-11","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["attribution","identity","traceability","humans.txt","search-intent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:attribution check:11","humanCommand":"Verify authorship and ownership statements across key public documents; review the search-intent evidence dimension for Attribution and Identity Signals"}},{"id":"ni-attribution-12","testId":"ni-attribution-12","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Accessibility Semantics","description":"Validates accessible names, relationships, landmarks, and keyboard-relevant structure for authorship clarity, origin traceability, and human oversight declarations. Evidence should include ARIA, labels, landmarks, and control evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Accessibility Semantics appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the accessibility semantics evidence for attribution and identity signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-attribution-12","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["attribution","identity","traceability","humans.txt","accessibility-semantics","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:attribution check:12","humanCommand":"Verify authorship and ownership statements across key public documents; review the accessibility-semantics evidence dimension for Attribution and Identity Signals"}},{"id":"ni-attribution-13","testId":"ni-attribution-13","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Mobile Readiness","description":"Validates mobile viewport, responsive content, and touch-friendly layout signals for authorship clarity, origin traceability, and human oversight declarations. Evidence should include viewport and responsive asset evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Mobile Readiness appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the mobile readiness evidence for attribution and identity signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-attribution-13","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["attribution","identity","traceability","humans.txt","mobile-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:attribution check:13","humanCommand":"Verify authorship and ownership statements across key public documents; review the mobile-readiness evidence dimension for Attribution and Identity Signals"}},{"id":"ni-attribution-14","testId":"ni-attribution-14","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Performance Budget","description":"Validates performance budget compliance using measured or bounded deterministic inputs for authorship clarity, origin traceability, and human oversight declarations. Evidence should include timing, byte, and Lighthouse-derived evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Performance Budget appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the performance budget evidence for attribution and identity signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-attribution-14","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["attribution","identity","traceability","humans.txt","performance-budget","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:attribution check:14","humanCommand":"Verify authorship and ownership statements across key public documents; review the performance-budget evidence dimension for Attribution and Identity Signals"}},{"id":"ni-attribution-15","testId":"ni-attribution-15","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Resource Efficiency","description":"Validates resource size, script/style count, and optimization opportunity signals for authorship clarity, origin traceability, and human oversight declarations. Evidence should include resource and markup evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Resource Efficiency appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the resource efficiency evidence for attribution and identity signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-attribution-15","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["attribution","identity","traceability","humans.txt","resource-efficiency","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:attribution check:15","humanCommand":"Verify authorship and ownership statements across key public documents; review the resource-efficiency evidence dimension for Attribution and Identity Signals"}},{"id":"ni-attribution-16","testId":"ni-attribution-16","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Cache Freshness","description":"Validates cache behavior, freshness hints, and stale-content risk for authorship clarity, origin traceability, and human oversight declarations. Evidence should include HTTP cache and timestamp evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Cache Freshness appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the cache freshness evidence for attribution and identity signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-attribution-16","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["attribution","identity","traceability","humans.txt","cache-freshness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:attribution check:16","humanCommand":"Verify authorship and ownership statements across key public documents; review the cache-freshness evidence dimension for Attribution and Identity Signals"}},{"id":"ni-attribution-17","testId":"ni-attribution-17","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Route Reliability","description":"Validates route reliability, redirect safety, and dead-link risk for authorship clarity, origin traceability, and human oversight declarations. Evidence should include status, redirect, and sitemap evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Route Reliability appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the route reliability evidence for attribution and identity signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-attribution-17","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["attribution","identity","traceability","humans.txt","route-reliability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:attribution check:17","humanCommand":"Verify authorship and ownership statements across key public documents; review the route-reliability evidence dimension for Attribution and Identity Signals"}},{"id":"ni-attribution-18","testId":"ni-attribution-18","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Feed Quality","description":"Validates RSS/Atom/feed usefulness, parseability, and freshness for authorship clarity, origin traceability, and human oversight declarations. Evidence should include feed XML and item evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Feed Quality appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the feed quality evidence for attribution and identity signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-attribution-18","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["attribution","identity","traceability","humans.txt","feed-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:attribution check:18","humanCommand":"Verify authorship and ownership statements across key public documents; review the feed-quality evidence dimension for Attribution and Identity Signals"}},{"id":"ni-attribution-19","testId":"ni-attribution-19","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Sitemap Quality","description":"Validates sitemap validity, public-safe URL coverage, and no-dead-link policy for authorship clarity, origin traceability, and human oversight declarations. Evidence should include sitemap XML and bounded link-check evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Sitemap Quality appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the sitemap quality evidence for attribution and identity signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-attribution-19","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["attribution","identity","traceability","humans.txt","sitemap-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:attribution check:19","humanCommand":"Verify authorship and ownership statements across key public documents; review the sitemap-quality evidence dimension for Attribution and Identity Signals"}},{"id":"ni-attribution-20","testId":"ni-attribution-20","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Robots Alignment","description":"Validates robots.txt alignment with public/protected policy and sitemap discovery for authorship clarity, origin traceability, and human oversight declarations. Evidence should include robots directives and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Robots Alignment appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the robots alignment evidence for attribution and identity signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-attribution-20","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["attribution","identity","traceability","humans.txt","robots-alignment","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:attribution check:20","humanCommand":"Verify authorship and ownership statements across key public documents; review the robots-alignment evidence dimension for Attribution and Identity Signals"}},{"id":"ni-attribution-21","testId":"ni-attribution-21","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Llms Structure","description":"Validates llms.txt structure, readability, endpoint coverage, and agent usefulness for authorship clarity, origin traceability, and human oversight declarations. Evidence should include plain-text section and line-length evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Llms Structure appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms structure evidence for attribution and identity signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-attribution-21","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["attribution","identity","traceability","humans.txt","llms-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:attribution check:21","humanCommand":"Verify authorship and ownership statements across key public documents; review the llms-structure evidence dimension for Attribution and Identity Signals"}},{"id":"ni-attribution-22","testId":"ni-attribution-22","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Llms Index Schema","description":"Validates llms-index JSON schema shape and count reconciliation for authorship clarity, origin traceability, and human oversight declarations. Evidence should include JSON keys, counts, and endpoint evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Llms Index Schema appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms index schema evidence for attribution and identity signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-attribution-22","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["attribution","identity","traceability","humans.txt","llms-index-schema","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:attribution check:22","humanCommand":"Verify authorship and ownership statements across key public documents; review the llms-index-schema evidence dimension for Attribution and Identity Signals"}},{"id":"ni-attribution-23","testId":"ni-attribution-23","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Humans Attribution","description":"Validates humans.txt attribution, maintainer, technology, and governance transparency for authorship clarity, origin traceability, and human oversight declarations. Evidence should include humans.txt section evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Humans Attribution appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the humans attribution evidence for attribution and identity signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-attribution-23","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["attribution","identity","traceability","humans.txt","humans-attribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:attribution check:23","humanCommand":"Verify authorship and ownership statements across key public documents; review the humans-attribution evidence dimension for Attribution and Identity Signals"}},{"id":"ni-attribution-24","testId":"ni-attribution-24","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Agent Policy","description":"Validates agent-policy JSON clarity for allowed, disallowed, and protected operations for authorship clarity, origin traceability, and human oversight declarations. Evidence should include well-known policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Agent Policy appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the agent policy evidence for attribution and identity signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-attribution-24","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["attribution","identity","traceability","humans.txt","agent-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:attribution check:24","humanCommand":"Verify authorship and ownership statements across key public documents; review the agent-policy evidence dimension for Attribution and Identity Signals"}},{"id":"ni-attribution-25","testId":"ni-attribution-25","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Ai Policy","description":"Validates AI policy clarity for training, search, answer use, caching, and attribution for authorship clarity, origin traceability, and human oversight declarations. Evidence should include well-known AI policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Ai Policy appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ai policy evidence for attribution and identity signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-attribution-25","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["attribution","identity","traceability","humans.txt","ai-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:attribution check:25","humanCommand":"Verify authorship and ownership statements across key public documents; review the ai-policy evidence dimension for Attribution and Identity Signals"}},{"id":"ni-attribution-26","testId":"ni-attribution-26","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Trust Policy","description":"Validates trust policy coverage for privacy, traceability, metadata, and protected actions for authorship clarity, origin traceability, and human oversight declarations. Evidence should include trust.json evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Trust Policy appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the trust policy evidence for attribution and identity signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-attribution-26","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["attribution","identity","traceability","humans.txt","trust-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:attribution check:26","humanCommand":"Verify authorship and ownership statements across key public documents; review the trust-policy evidence dimension for Attribution and Identity Signals"}},{"id":"ni-attribution-27","testId":"ni-attribution-27","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Openapi Contract","description":"Validates OpenAPI availability, server URL accuracy, schemas, and auth policy for authorship clarity, origin traceability, and human oversight declarations. Evidence should include OpenAPI text/JSON evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Openapi Contract appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the openapi contract evidence for attribution and identity signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-attribution-27","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["attribution","identity","traceability","humans.txt","openapi-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:attribution check:27","humanCommand":"Verify authorship and ownership statements across key public documents; review the openapi-contract evidence dimension for Attribution and Identity Signals"}},{"id":"ni-attribution-28","testId":"ni-attribution-28","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Mcp Contract","description":"Validates MCP JSON-RPC introspection, real tools, resources, and protected boundaries for authorship clarity, origin traceability, and human oversight declarations. Evidence should include MCP manifest and initialize evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Mcp Contract appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the mcp contract evidence for attribution and identity signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-attribution-28","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["attribution","identity","traceability","humans.txt","mcp-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:attribution check:28","humanCommand":"Verify authorship and ownership statements across key public documents; review the mcp-contract evidence dimension for Attribution and Identity Signals"}},{"id":"ni-attribution-29","testId":"ni-attribution-29","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Api Error Shape","description":"Validates API success/error response shape consistency for authorship clarity, origin traceability, and human oversight declarations. Evidence should include REST envelope evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Api Error Shape appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the api error shape evidence for attribution and identity signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-attribution-29","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["attribution","identity","traceability","humans.txt","api-error-shape","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:attribution check:29","humanCommand":"Verify authorship and ownership statements across key public documents; review the api-error-shape evidence dimension for Attribution and Identity Signals"}},{"id":"ni-attribution-30","testId":"ni-attribution-30","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Traceability","description":"Validates trace propagation, request IDs, and safe observability correlation for authorship clarity, origin traceability, and human oversight declarations. Evidence should include trace header and metadata evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Traceability appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the traceability evidence for attribution and identity signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-attribution-30","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["attribution","identity","traceability","humans.txt","traceability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:attribution check:30","humanCommand":"Verify authorship and ownership statements across key public documents; review the traceability evidence dimension for Attribution and Identity Signals"}},{"id":"ni-attribution-31","testId":"ni-attribution-31","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Ja4 Redaction","description":"Validates fingerprint-adjacent metadata redaction and non-public raw JA4 handling for authorship clarity, origin traceability, and human oversight declarations. Evidence should include metadata policy and redaction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Ja4 Redaction appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the ja4 redaction evidence for attribution and identity signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-attribution-31","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["attribution","identity","traceability","humans.txt","ja4-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:attribution check:31","humanCommand":"Verify authorship and ownership statements across key public documents; review the ja4-redaction evidence dimension for Attribution and Identity Signals"}},{"id":"ni-attribution-32","testId":"ni-attribution-32","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Secret Redaction","description":"Validates absence of secrets, generic key examples, cookies, and raw tokens in public outputs for authorship clarity, origin traceability, and human oversight declarations. Evidence should include public artifact scan evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Secret Redaction appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the secret redaction evidence for attribution and identity signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-attribution-32","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["attribution","identity","traceability","humans.txt","secret-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:attribution check:32","humanCommand":"Verify authorship and ownership statements across key public documents; review the secret-redaction evidence dimension for Attribution and Identity Signals"}},{"id":"ni-attribution-33","testId":"ni-attribution-33","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Security Headers","description":"Validates security header coverage and hardened transport signals for authorship clarity, origin traceability, and human oversight declarations. Evidence should include HTTP header evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Security Headers appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the security headers evidence for attribution and identity signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-attribution-33","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["attribution","identity","traceability","humans.txt","security-headers","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:attribution check:33","humanCommand":"Verify authorship and ownership statements across key public documents; review the security-headers evidence dimension for Attribution and Identity Signals"}},{"id":"ni-attribution-34","testId":"ni-attribution-34","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Privacy Consent","description":"Validates privacy policy, consent, attribution, and data-use disclosure quality for authorship clarity, origin traceability, and human oversight declarations. Evidence should include public page and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Privacy Consent appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the privacy consent evidence for attribution and identity signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-attribution-34","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["attribution","identity","traceability","humans.txt","privacy-consent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:attribution check:34","humanCommand":"Verify authorship and ownership statements across key public documents; review the privacy-consent evidence dimension for Attribution and Identity Signals"}},{"id":"ni-attribution-35","testId":"ni-attribution-35","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Structured Data","description":"Validates JSON-LD and entity modeling for machine interpretation for authorship clarity, origin traceability, and human oversight declarations. Evidence should include schema block and parse evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Structured Data appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the structured data evidence for attribution and identity signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-attribution-35","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["attribution","identity","traceability","humans.txt","structured-data","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:attribution check:35","humanCommand":"Verify authorship and ownership statements across key public documents; review the structured-data evidence dimension for Attribution and Identity Signals"}},{"id":"ni-attribution-36","testId":"ni-attribution-36","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Social Preview","description":"Validates Open Graph and Twitter/X card readiness for public sharing for authorship clarity, origin traceability, and human oversight declarations. Evidence should include meta tag evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Social Preview appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the social preview evidence for attribution and identity signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-attribution-36","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["attribution","identity","traceability","humans.txt","social-preview","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:attribution check:36","humanCommand":"Verify authorship and ownership statements across key public documents; review the social-preview evidence dimension for Attribution and Identity Signals"}},{"id":"ni-attribution-37","testId":"ni-attribution-37","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Attribution and Identity Signals: I18n Routing","description":"Validates locale route, hreflang, language declaration, and translation readiness for authorship clarity, origin traceability, and human oversight declarations. Evidence should include lang/hreflang and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Attribution and Identity Signals: I18n Routing appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the i18n routing evidence for attribution and identity signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-attribution-37","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["attribution","identity","traceability","humans.txt","i18n-routing","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:attribution check:37","humanCommand":"Verify authorship and ownership statements across key public documents; review the i18n-routing evidence dimension for Attribution and Identity Signals"}},{"id":"ni-attribution-38","testId":"ni-attribution-38","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Readability","description":"Validates human readability, sectioning, sentence complexity, and comprehension support for authorship clarity, origin traceability, and human oversight declarations. Evidence should include extracted content evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Readability appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the readability evidence for attribution and identity signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-attribution-38","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["attribution","identity","traceability","humans.txt","readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:attribution check:38","humanCommand":"Verify authorship and ownership statements across key public documents; review the readability evidence dimension for Attribution and Identity Signals"}},{"id":"ni-attribution-39","testId":"ni-attribution-39","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Content Utility","description":"Validates non-placeholder content usefulness and domain-specific public value for authorship clarity, origin traceability, and human oversight declarations. Evidence should include content extraction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Content Utility appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the content utility evidence for attribution and identity signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-attribution-39","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["attribution","identity","traceability","humans.txt","content-utility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:attribution check:39","humanCommand":"Verify authorship and ownership statements across key public documents; review the content-utility evidence dimension for Attribution and Identity Signals"}},{"id":"ni-attribution-40","testId":"ni-attribution-40","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Recommendation Grounding","description":"Validates recommendation grounding in deterministic evidence instead of fabricated model output for authorship clarity, origin traceability, and human oversight declarations. Evidence should include issue and remediation evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Recommendation Grounding appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the recommendation grounding evidence for attribution and identity signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-attribution-40","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["attribution","identity","traceability","humans.txt","recommendation-grounding","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:attribution check:40","humanCommand":"Verify authorship and ownership statements across key public documents; review the recommendation-grounding evidence dimension for Attribution and Identity Signals"}},{"id":"ni-attribution-41","testId":"ni-attribution-41","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Evidence Quality","description":"Validates evidence completeness, public safety, and reproducibility for authorship clarity, origin traceability, and human oversight declarations. Evidence should include test output and artifact evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Evidence Quality appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the evidence quality evidence for attribution and identity signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-attribution-41","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["attribution","identity","traceability","humans.txt","evidence-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:attribution check:41","humanCommand":"Verify authorship and ownership statements across key public documents; review the evidence-quality evidence dimension for Attribution and Identity Signals"}},{"id":"ni-attribution-42","testId":"ni-attribution-42","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Threshold Policy","description":"Validates threshold clarity, pass/warn/fail semantics, and scoring transparency for authorship clarity, origin traceability, and human oversight declarations. Evidence should include threshold and result status evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Threshold Policy appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the threshold policy evidence for attribution and identity signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-attribution-42","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["attribution","identity","traceability","humans.txt","threshold-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:attribution check:42","humanCommand":"Verify authorship and ownership statements across key public documents; review the threshold-policy evidence dimension for Attribution and Identity Signals"}},{"id":"ni-attribution-43","testId":"ni-attribution-43","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Confidence","description":"Validates confidence scoring and degraded-input disclosure for authorship clarity, origin traceability, and human oversight declarations. Evidence should include source freshness and input availability evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Confidence appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the confidence evidence for attribution and identity signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-attribution-43","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["attribution","identity","traceability","humans.txt","confidence","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:attribution check:43","humanCommand":"Verify authorship and ownership statements across key public documents; review the confidence evidence dimension for Attribution and Identity Signals"}},{"id":"ni-attribution-44","testId":"ni-attribution-44","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Trend Readiness","description":"Validates historical comparability and timeline readiness for future reruns for authorship clarity, origin traceability, and human oversight declarations. Evidence should include analysis ID, timestamp, and persistence evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Trend Readiness appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the trend readiness evidence for attribution and identity signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-attribution-44","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["attribution","identity","traceability","humans.txt","trend-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:attribution check:44","humanCommand":"Verify authorship and ownership statements across key public documents; review the trend-readiness evidence dimension for Attribution and Identity Signals"}},{"id":"ni-attribution-45","testId":"ni-attribution-45","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Ranking Readiness","description":"Validates ranking input completeness and profile compatibility for authorship clarity, origin traceability, and human oversight declarations. Evidence should include score and profile evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Ranking Readiness appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ranking readiness evidence for attribution and identity signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-attribution-45","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["attribution","identity","traceability","humans.txt","ranking-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:attribution check:45","humanCommand":"Verify authorship and ownership statements across key public documents; review the ranking-readiness evidence dimension for Attribution and Identity Signals"}},{"id":"ni-attribution-46","testId":"ni-attribution-46","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Network Contribution","description":"Validates PlatPhorm network contribution through discovery, integrations, and standards compliance for authorship clarity, origin traceability, and human oversight declarations. Evidence should include network graph and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Network Contribution appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the network contribution evidence for attribution and identity signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-attribution-46","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["attribution","identity","traceability","humans.txt","network-contribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:attribution check:46","humanCommand":"Verify authorship and ownership statements across key public documents; review the network-contribution evidence dimension for Attribution and Identity Signals"}},{"id":"ni-attribution-47","testId":"ni-attribution-47","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Report Readiness","description":"Validates report/export categorization with public-safe evidence and protected boundaries for authorship clarity, origin traceability, and human oversight declarations. Evidence should include report section mapping evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Report Readiness appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the report readiness evidence for attribution and identity signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-attribution-47","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["attribution","identity","traceability","humans.txt","report-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:attribution check:47","humanCommand":"Verify authorship and ownership statements across key public documents; review the report-readiness evidence dimension for Attribution and Identity Signals"}},{"id":"ni-attribution-48","testId":"ni-attribution-48","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Operator Actionability","description":"Validates clear remediation, owner action, difficulty, and retest path for authorship clarity, origin traceability, and human oversight declarations. Evidence should include fix instructions and command evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Operator Actionability appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the operator actionability evidence for attribution and identity signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-attribution-48","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["attribution","identity","traceability","humans.txt","operator-actionability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:attribution check:48","humanCommand":"Verify authorship and ownership statements across key public documents; review the operator-actionability evidence dimension for Attribution and Identity Signals"}},{"id":"ni-attribution-49","testId":"ni-attribution-49","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Degraded State","description":"Validates honest degraded, unavailable, skipped, and not-applicable states for authorship clarity, origin traceability, and human oversight declarations. Evidence should include status and storage evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Degraded State appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the degraded state evidence for attribution and identity signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-attribution-49","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["attribution","identity","traceability","humans.txt","degraded-state","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:attribution check:49","humanCommand":"Verify authorship and ownership statements across key public documents; review the degraded-state evidence dimension for Attribution and Identity Signals"}},{"id":"ni-attribution-50","testId":"ni-attribution-50","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Reproducibility","description":"Validates stable CLI/API/human reproduction path and deterministic rerun instructions for authorship clarity, origin traceability, and human oversight declarations. Evidence should include commands and registry version evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Attribution and Identity Signals: Reproducibility appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the reproducibility evidence for attribution and identity signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-attribution-50","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["attribution","identity","traceability","humans.txt","reproducibility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/.well-known/humans.txt').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:attribution check:50","humanCommand":"Verify authorship and ownership statements across key public documents; review the reproducibility evidence dimension for Attribution and Identity Signals"}},{"id":"ni-resilience-01","testId":"ni-resilience-01","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Operational Resilience: Availability","description":"Validates public route availability and successful bounded fetch behavior for degraded-mode resilience, timeout handling, and bounded reliability behavior. Evidence should include HTTP status, timeout, and redirect evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Operational Resilience: Availability appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the availability evidence for operational resilience, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-resilience-01","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["resilience","availability","reliability","performance","availability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:resilience check:1","humanCommand":"Simulate degraded dependencies and verify stable fallback behavior; review the availability evidence dimension for Operational Resilience"}},{"id":"ni-resilience-02","testId":"ni-resilience-02","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Operational Resilience: Public Safety","description":"Validates public-safe access boundaries without exposing private or protected data for degraded-mode resilience, timeout handling, and bounded reliability behavior. Evidence should include route policy and response-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Operational Resilience: Public Safety appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the public safety evidence for operational resilience, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-resilience-02","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["resilience","availability","reliability","performance","public-safety","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:resilience check:2","humanCommand":"Simulate degraded dependencies and verify stable fallback behavior; review the public-safety evidence dimension for Operational Resilience"}},{"id":"ni-resilience-03","testId":"ni-resilience-03","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Operational Resilience: Canonical Url","description":"Validates canonical URL stability and normalized route identity for degraded-mode resilience, timeout handling, and bounded reliability behavior. Evidence should include canonical tags, redirects, and normalized URL evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Operational Resilience: Canonical Url appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the canonical url evidence for operational resilience, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-resilience-03","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["resilience","availability","reliability","performance","canonical-url","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:resilience check:3","humanCommand":"Simulate degraded dependencies and verify stable fallback behavior; review the canonical-url evidence dimension for Operational Resilience"}},{"id":"ni-resilience-04","testId":"ni-resilience-04","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Operational Resilience: Metadata Clarity","description":"Validates title, description, and page-specific metadata clarity for degraded-mode resilience, timeout handling, and bounded reliability behavior. Evidence should include HTML metadata and extracted text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Operational Resilience: Metadata Clarity appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the metadata clarity evidence for operational resilience, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-resilience-04","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["resilience","availability","reliability","performance","metadata-clarity","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:resilience check:4","humanCommand":"Simulate degraded dependencies and verify stable fallback behavior; review the metadata-clarity evidence dimension for Operational Resilience"}},{"id":"ni-resilience-05","testId":"ni-resilience-05","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Operational Resilience: Semantic Structure","description":"Validates semantic HTML structure for humans, agents, and assistive technology for degraded-mode resilience, timeout handling, and bounded reliability behavior. Evidence should include heading, landmark, and element evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Operational Resilience: Semantic Structure appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the semantic structure evidence for operational resilience, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-resilience-05","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["resilience","availability","reliability","performance","semantic-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:resilience check:5","humanCommand":"Simulate degraded dependencies and verify stable fallback behavior; review the semantic-structure evidence dimension for Operational Resilience"}},{"id":"ni-resilience-06","testId":"ni-resilience-06","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Operational Resilience: Machine Readability","description":"Validates machine-readable public content and predictable parsing surfaces for degraded-mode resilience, timeout handling, and bounded reliability behavior. Evidence should include structured tags, JSON-LD, and document-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Operational Resilience: Machine Readability appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the machine readability evidence for operational resilience, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-resilience-06","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["resilience","availability","reliability","performance","machine-readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:resilience check:6","humanCommand":"Simulate degraded dependencies and verify stable fallback behavior; review the machine-readability evidence dimension for Operational Resilience"}},{"id":"ni-resilience-07","testId":"ni-resilience-07","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Operational Resilience: Agent Discovery","description":"Validates agent discovery hints and AI-readable policy/documentation signals for degraded-mode resilience, timeout handling, and bounded reliability behavior. Evidence should include llms, policy, MCP, OpenAPI, or schema evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Operational Resilience: Agent Discovery appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the agent discovery evidence for operational resilience, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-resilience-07","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["resilience","availability","reliability","performance","agent-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:resilience check:7","humanCommand":"Simulate degraded dependencies and verify stable fallback behavior; review the agent-discovery evidence dimension for Operational Resilience"}},{"id":"ni-resilience-08","testId":"ni-resilience-08","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Operational Resilience: Crawler Discovery","description":"Validates crawler discovery paths through robots, sitemap, feeds, and canonical links for degraded-mode resilience, timeout handling, and bounded reliability behavior. Evidence should include discovery artifact and link evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Operational Resilience: Crawler Discovery appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the crawler discovery evidence for operational resilience, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-resilience-08","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["resilience","availability","reliability","performance","crawler-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:resilience check:8","humanCommand":"Simulate degraded dependencies and verify stable fallback behavior; review the crawler-discovery evidence dimension for Operational Resilience"}},{"id":"ni-resilience-09","testId":"ni-resilience-09","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Operational Resilience: Answerability","description":"Validates direct answer extraction and quotable explanatory content for degraded-mode resilience, timeout handling, and bounded reliability behavior. Evidence should include question, summary, heading, and paragraph evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Operational Resilience: Answerability appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the answerability evidence for operational resilience, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-resilience-09","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["resilience","availability","reliability","performance","answerability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:resilience check:9","humanCommand":"Simulate degraded dependencies and verify stable fallback behavior; review the answerability evidence dimension for Operational Resilience"}},{"id":"ni-resilience-10","testId":"ni-resilience-10","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Operational Resilience: Generative Context","description":"Validates GEO context quality for generative engines without inventing measured facts for degraded-mode resilience, timeout handling, and bounded reliability behavior. Evidence should include entity, source, and instruction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Operational Resilience: Generative Context appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the generative context evidence for operational resilience, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-resilience-10","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["resilience","availability","reliability","performance","generative-context","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:resilience check:10","humanCommand":"Simulate degraded dependencies and verify stable fallback behavior; review the generative-context evidence dimension for Operational Resilience"}},{"id":"ni-resilience-11","testId":"ni-resilience-11","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Operational Resilience: Search Intent","description":"Validates search intent alignment and snippet-friendly content structure for degraded-mode resilience, timeout handling, and bounded reliability behavior. Evidence should include metadata, headings, and topical text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Operational Resilience: Search Intent appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the search intent evidence for operational resilience, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-resilience-11","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["resilience","availability","reliability","performance","search-intent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:resilience check:11","humanCommand":"Simulate degraded dependencies and verify stable fallback behavior; review the search-intent evidence dimension for Operational Resilience"}},{"id":"ni-resilience-12","testId":"ni-resilience-12","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Operational Resilience: Accessibility Semantics","description":"Validates accessible names, relationships, landmarks, and keyboard-relevant structure for degraded-mode resilience, timeout handling, and bounded reliability behavior. Evidence should include ARIA, labels, landmarks, and control evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Operational Resilience: Accessibility Semantics appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the accessibility semantics evidence for operational resilience, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-resilience-12","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["resilience","availability","reliability","performance","accessibility-semantics","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:resilience check:12","humanCommand":"Simulate degraded dependencies and verify stable fallback behavior; review the accessibility-semantics evidence dimension for Operational Resilience"}},{"id":"ni-resilience-13","testId":"ni-resilience-13","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Operational Resilience: Mobile Readiness","description":"Validates mobile viewport, responsive content, and touch-friendly layout signals for degraded-mode resilience, timeout handling, and bounded reliability behavior. Evidence should include viewport and responsive asset evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Operational Resilience: Mobile Readiness appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the mobile readiness evidence for operational resilience, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-resilience-13","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["resilience","availability","reliability","performance","mobile-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:resilience check:13","humanCommand":"Simulate degraded dependencies and verify stable fallback behavior; review the mobile-readiness evidence dimension for Operational Resilience"}},{"id":"ni-resilience-14","testId":"ni-resilience-14","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Operational Resilience: Performance Budget","description":"Validates performance budget compliance using measured or bounded deterministic inputs for degraded-mode resilience, timeout handling, and bounded reliability behavior. Evidence should include timing, byte, and Lighthouse-derived evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Operational Resilience: Performance Budget appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the performance budget evidence for operational resilience, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-resilience-14","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["resilience","availability","reliability","performance","performance-budget","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:resilience check:14","humanCommand":"Simulate degraded dependencies and verify stable fallback behavior; review the performance-budget evidence dimension for Operational Resilience"}},{"id":"ni-resilience-15","testId":"ni-resilience-15","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Operational Resilience: Resource Efficiency","description":"Validates resource size, script/style count, and optimization opportunity signals for degraded-mode resilience, timeout handling, and bounded reliability behavior. Evidence should include resource and markup evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Operational Resilience: Resource Efficiency appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the resource efficiency evidence for operational resilience, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-resilience-15","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["resilience","availability","reliability","performance","resource-efficiency","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:resilience check:15","humanCommand":"Simulate degraded dependencies and verify stable fallback behavior; review the resource-efficiency evidence dimension for Operational Resilience"}},{"id":"ni-resilience-16","testId":"ni-resilience-16","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Operational Resilience: Cache Freshness","description":"Validates cache behavior, freshness hints, and stale-content risk for degraded-mode resilience, timeout handling, and bounded reliability behavior. Evidence should include HTTP cache and timestamp evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Operational Resilience: Cache Freshness appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the cache freshness evidence for operational resilience, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-resilience-16","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["resilience","availability","reliability","performance","cache-freshness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:resilience check:16","humanCommand":"Simulate degraded dependencies and verify stable fallback behavior; review the cache-freshness evidence dimension for Operational Resilience"}},{"id":"ni-resilience-17","testId":"ni-resilience-17","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Operational Resilience: Route Reliability","description":"Validates route reliability, redirect safety, and dead-link risk for degraded-mode resilience, timeout handling, and bounded reliability behavior. Evidence should include status, redirect, and sitemap evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Operational Resilience: Route Reliability appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the route reliability evidence for operational resilience, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-resilience-17","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["resilience","availability","reliability","performance","route-reliability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:resilience check:17","humanCommand":"Simulate degraded dependencies and verify stable fallback behavior; review the route-reliability evidence dimension for Operational Resilience"}},{"id":"ni-resilience-18","testId":"ni-resilience-18","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Operational Resilience: Feed Quality","description":"Validates RSS/Atom/feed usefulness, parseability, and freshness for degraded-mode resilience, timeout handling, and bounded reliability behavior. Evidence should include feed XML and item evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Operational Resilience: Feed Quality appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the feed quality evidence for operational resilience, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-resilience-18","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["resilience","availability","reliability","performance","feed-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:resilience check:18","humanCommand":"Simulate degraded dependencies and verify stable fallback behavior; review the feed-quality evidence dimension for Operational Resilience"}},{"id":"ni-resilience-19","testId":"ni-resilience-19","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Operational Resilience: Sitemap Quality","description":"Validates sitemap validity, public-safe URL coverage, and no-dead-link policy for degraded-mode resilience, timeout handling, and bounded reliability behavior. Evidence should include sitemap XML and bounded link-check evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Operational Resilience: Sitemap Quality appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the sitemap quality evidence for operational resilience, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-resilience-19","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["resilience","availability","reliability","performance","sitemap-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:resilience check:19","humanCommand":"Simulate degraded dependencies and verify stable fallback behavior; review the sitemap-quality evidence dimension for Operational Resilience"}},{"id":"ni-resilience-20","testId":"ni-resilience-20","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Operational Resilience: Robots Alignment","description":"Validates robots.txt alignment with public/protected policy and sitemap discovery for degraded-mode resilience, timeout handling, and bounded reliability behavior. Evidence should include robots directives and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Operational Resilience: Robots Alignment appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the robots alignment evidence for operational resilience, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-resilience-20","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["resilience","availability","reliability","performance","robots-alignment","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:resilience check:20","humanCommand":"Simulate degraded dependencies and verify stable fallback behavior; review the robots-alignment evidence dimension for Operational Resilience"}},{"id":"ni-resilience-21","testId":"ni-resilience-21","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Operational Resilience: Llms Structure","description":"Validates llms.txt structure, readability, endpoint coverage, and agent usefulness for degraded-mode resilience, timeout handling, and bounded reliability behavior. Evidence should include plain-text section and line-length evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Operational Resilience: Llms Structure appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms structure evidence for operational resilience, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-resilience-21","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["resilience","availability","reliability","performance","llms-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:resilience check:21","humanCommand":"Simulate degraded dependencies and verify stable fallback behavior; review the llms-structure evidence dimension for Operational Resilience"}},{"id":"ni-resilience-22","testId":"ni-resilience-22","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Operational Resilience: Llms Index Schema","description":"Validates llms-index JSON schema shape and count reconciliation for degraded-mode resilience, timeout handling, and bounded reliability behavior. Evidence should include JSON keys, counts, and endpoint evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Operational Resilience: Llms Index Schema appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms index schema evidence for operational resilience, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-resilience-22","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["resilience","availability","reliability","performance","llms-index-schema","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:resilience check:22","humanCommand":"Simulate degraded dependencies and verify stable fallback behavior; review the llms-index-schema evidence dimension for Operational Resilience"}},{"id":"ni-resilience-23","testId":"ni-resilience-23","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Operational Resilience: Humans Attribution","description":"Validates humans.txt attribution, maintainer, technology, and governance transparency for degraded-mode resilience, timeout handling, and bounded reliability behavior. Evidence should include humans.txt section evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Operational Resilience: Humans Attribution appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the humans attribution evidence for operational resilience, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-resilience-23","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["resilience","availability","reliability","performance","humans-attribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:resilience check:23","humanCommand":"Simulate degraded dependencies and verify stable fallback behavior; review the humans-attribution evidence dimension for Operational Resilience"}},{"id":"ni-resilience-24","testId":"ni-resilience-24","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Operational Resilience: Agent Policy","description":"Validates agent-policy JSON clarity for allowed, disallowed, and protected operations for degraded-mode resilience, timeout handling, and bounded reliability behavior. Evidence should include well-known policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Operational Resilience: Agent Policy appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the agent policy evidence for operational resilience, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-resilience-24","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["resilience","availability","reliability","performance","agent-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:resilience check:24","humanCommand":"Simulate degraded dependencies and verify stable fallback behavior; review the agent-policy evidence dimension for Operational Resilience"}},{"id":"ni-resilience-25","testId":"ni-resilience-25","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Operational Resilience: Ai Policy","description":"Validates AI policy clarity for training, search, answer use, caching, and attribution for degraded-mode resilience, timeout handling, and bounded reliability behavior. Evidence should include well-known AI policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Operational Resilience: Ai Policy appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ai policy evidence for operational resilience, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-resilience-25","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["resilience","availability","reliability","performance","ai-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:resilience check:25","humanCommand":"Simulate degraded dependencies and verify stable fallback behavior; review the ai-policy evidence dimension for Operational Resilience"}},{"id":"ni-resilience-26","testId":"ni-resilience-26","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Operational Resilience: Trust Policy","description":"Validates trust policy coverage for privacy, traceability, metadata, and protected actions for degraded-mode resilience, timeout handling, and bounded reliability behavior. Evidence should include trust.json evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Operational Resilience: Trust Policy appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the trust policy evidence for operational resilience, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-resilience-26","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["resilience","availability","reliability","performance","trust-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:resilience check:26","humanCommand":"Simulate degraded dependencies and verify stable fallback behavior; review the trust-policy evidence dimension for Operational Resilience"}},{"id":"ni-resilience-27","testId":"ni-resilience-27","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Operational Resilience: Openapi Contract","description":"Validates OpenAPI availability, server URL accuracy, schemas, and auth policy for degraded-mode resilience, timeout handling, and bounded reliability behavior. Evidence should include OpenAPI text/JSON evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Operational Resilience: Openapi Contract appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the openapi contract evidence for operational resilience, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-resilience-27","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["resilience","availability","reliability","performance","openapi-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:resilience check:27","humanCommand":"Simulate degraded dependencies and verify stable fallback behavior; review the openapi-contract evidence dimension for Operational Resilience"}},{"id":"ni-resilience-28","testId":"ni-resilience-28","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Operational Resilience: Mcp Contract","description":"Validates MCP JSON-RPC introspection, real tools, resources, and protected boundaries for degraded-mode resilience, timeout handling, and bounded reliability behavior. Evidence should include MCP manifest and initialize evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Operational Resilience: Mcp Contract appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the mcp contract evidence for operational resilience, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-resilience-28","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["resilience","availability","reliability","performance","mcp-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:resilience check:28","humanCommand":"Simulate degraded dependencies and verify stable fallback behavior; review the mcp-contract evidence dimension for Operational Resilience"}},{"id":"ni-resilience-29","testId":"ni-resilience-29","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Operational Resilience: Api Error Shape","description":"Validates API success/error response shape consistency for degraded-mode resilience, timeout handling, and bounded reliability behavior. Evidence should include REST envelope evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Operational Resilience: Api Error Shape appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the api error shape evidence for operational resilience, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-resilience-29","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["resilience","availability","reliability","performance","api-error-shape","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:resilience check:29","humanCommand":"Simulate degraded dependencies and verify stable fallback behavior; review the api-error-shape evidence dimension for Operational Resilience"}},{"id":"ni-resilience-30","testId":"ni-resilience-30","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Operational Resilience: Traceability","description":"Validates trace propagation, request IDs, and safe observability correlation for degraded-mode resilience, timeout handling, and bounded reliability behavior. Evidence should include trace header and metadata evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Operational Resilience: Traceability appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the traceability evidence for operational resilience, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-resilience-30","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["resilience","availability","reliability","performance","traceability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:resilience check:30","humanCommand":"Simulate degraded dependencies and verify stable fallback behavior; review the traceability evidence dimension for Operational Resilience"}},{"id":"ni-resilience-31","testId":"ni-resilience-31","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Operational Resilience: Ja4 Redaction","description":"Validates fingerprint-adjacent metadata redaction and non-public raw JA4 handling for degraded-mode resilience, timeout handling, and bounded reliability behavior. Evidence should include metadata policy and redaction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Operational Resilience: Ja4 Redaction appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the ja4 redaction evidence for operational resilience, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-resilience-31","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["resilience","availability","reliability","performance","ja4-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:resilience check:31","humanCommand":"Simulate degraded dependencies and verify stable fallback behavior; review the ja4-redaction evidence dimension for Operational Resilience"}},{"id":"ni-resilience-32","testId":"ni-resilience-32","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Operational Resilience: Secret Redaction","description":"Validates absence of secrets, generic key examples, cookies, and raw tokens in public outputs for degraded-mode resilience, timeout handling, and bounded reliability behavior. Evidence should include public artifact scan evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Operational Resilience: Secret Redaction appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the secret redaction evidence for operational resilience, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-resilience-32","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["resilience","availability","reliability","performance","secret-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:resilience check:32","humanCommand":"Simulate degraded dependencies and verify stable fallback behavior; review the secret-redaction evidence dimension for Operational Resilience"}},{"id":"ni-resilience-33","testId":"ni-resilience-33","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Operational Resilience: Security Headers","description":"Validates security header coverage and hardened transport signals for degraded-mode resilience, timeout handling, and bounded reliability behavior. Evidence should include HTTP header evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Operational Resilience: Security Headers appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the security headers evidence for operational resilience, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-resilience-33","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["resilience","availability","reliability","performance","security-headers","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:resilience check:33","humanCommand":"Simulate degraded dependencies and verify stable fallback behavior; review the security-headers evidence dimension for Operational Resilience"}},{"id":"ni-resilience-34","testId":"ni-resilience-34","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Operational Resilience: Privacy Consent","description":"Validates privacy policy, consent, attribution, and data-use disclosure quality for degraded-mode resilience, timeout handling, and bounded reliability behavior. Evidence should include public page and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Operational Resilience: Privacy Consent appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the privacy consent evidence for operational resilience, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-resilience-34","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["resilience","availability","reliability","performance","privacy-consent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:resilience check:34","humanCommand":"Simulate degraded dependencies and verify stable fallback behavior; review the privacy-consent evidence dimension for Operational Resilience"}},{"id":"ni-resilience-35","testId":"ni-resilience-35","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Operational Resilience: Structured Data","description":"Validates JSON-LD and entity modeling for machine interpretation for degraded-mode resilience, timeout handling, and bounded reliability behavior. Evidence should include schema block and parse evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Operational Resilience: Structured Data appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the structured data evidence for operational resilience, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-resilience-35","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["resilience","availability","reliability","performance","structured-data","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:resilience check:35","humanCommand":"Simulate degraded dependencies and verify stable fallback behavior; review the structured-data evidence dimension for Operational Resilience"}},{"id":"ni-resilience-36","testId":"ni-resilience-36","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Operational Resilience: Social Preview","description":"Validates Open Graph and Twitter/X card readiness for public sharing for degraded-mode resilience, timeout handling, and bounded reliability behavior. Evidence should include meta tag evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Operational Resilience: Social Preview appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the social preview evidence for operational resilience, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-resilience-36","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["resilience","availability","reliability","performance","social-preview","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:resilience check:36","humanCommand":"Simulate degraded dependencies and verify stable fallback behavior; review the social-preview evidence dimension for Operational Resilience"}},{"id":"ni-resilience-37","testId":"ni-resilience-37","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Operational Resilience: I18n Routing","description":"Validates locale route, hreflang, language declaration, and translation readiness for degraded-mode resilience, timeout handling, and bounded reliability behavior. Evidence should include lang/hreflang and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Operational Resilience: I18n Routing appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the i18n routing evidence for operational resilience, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-resilience-37","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["resilience","availability","reliability","performance","i18n-routing","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:resilience check:37","humanCommand":"Simulate degraded dependencies and verify stable fallback behavior; review the i18n-routing evidence dimension for Operational Resilience"}},{"id":"ni-resilience-38","testId":"ni-resilience-38","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Operational Resilience: Readability","description":"Validates human readability, sectioning, sentence complexity, and comprehension support for degraded-mode resilience, timeout handling, and bounded reliability behavior. Evidence should include extracted content evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Operational Resilience: Readability appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the readability evidence for operational resilience, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-resilience-38","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["resilience","availability","reliability","performance","readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:resilience check:38","humanCommand":"Simulate degraded dependencies and verify stable fallback behavior; review the readability evidence dimension for Operational Resilience"}},{"id":"ni-resilience-39","testId":"ni-resilience-39","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Operational Resilience: Content Utility","description":"Validates non-placeholder content usefulness and domain-specific public value for degraded-mode resilience, timeout handling, and bounded reliability behavior. Evidence should include content extraction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Operational Resilience: Content Utility appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the content utility evidence for operational resilience, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-resilience-39","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["resilience","availability","reliability","performance","content-utility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:resilience check:39","humanCommand":"Simulate degraded dependencies and verify stable fallback behavior; review the content-utility evidence dimension for Operational Resilience"}},{"id":"ni-resilience-40","testId":"ni-resilience-40","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Operational Resilience: Recommendation Grounding","description":"Validates recommendation grounding in deterministic evidence instead of fabricated model output for degraded-mode resilience, timeout handling, and bounded reliability behavior. Evidence should include issue and remediation evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Operational Resilience: Recommendation Grounding appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the recommendation grounding evidence for operational resilience, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-resilience-40","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["resilience","availability","reliability","performance","recommendation-grounding","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:resilience check:40","humanCommand":"Simulate degraded dependencies and verify stable fallback behavior; review the recommendation-grounding evidence dimension for Operational Resilience"}},{"id":"ni-resilience-41","testId":"ni-resilience-41","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Operational Resilience: Evidence Quality","description":"Validates evidence completeness, public safety, and reproducibility for degraded-mode resilience, timeout handling, and bounded reliability behavior. Evidence should include test output and artifact evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Operational Resilience: Evidence Quality appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the evidence quality evidence for operational resilience, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-resilience-41","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["resilience","availability","reliability","performance","evidence-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:resilience check:41","humanCommand":"Simulate degraded dependencies and verify stable fallback behavior; review the evidence-quality evidence dimension for Operational Resilience"}},{"id":"ni-resilience-42","testId":"ni-resilience-42","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Operational Resilience: Threshold Policy","description":"Validates threshold clarity, pass/warn/fail semantics, and scoring transparency for degraded-mode resilience, timeout handling, and bounded reliability behavior. Evidence should include threshold and result status evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Operational Resilience: Threshold Policy appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the threshold policy evidence for operational resilience, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-resilience-42","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["resilience","availability","reliability","performance","threshold-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:resilience check:42","humanCommand":"Simulate degraded dependencies and verify stable fallback behavior; review the threshold-policy evidence dimension for Operational Resilience"}},{"id":"ni-resilience-43","testId":"ni-resilience-43","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Operational Resilience: Confidence","description":"Validates confidence scoring and degraded-input disclosure for degraded-mode resilience, timeout handling, and bounded reliability behavior. Evidence should include source freshness and input availability evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Operational Resilience: Confidence appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the confidence evidence for operational resilience, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-resilience-43","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["resilience","availability","reliability","performance","confidence","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:resilience check:43","humanCommand":"Simulate degraded dependencies and verify stable fallback behavior; review the confidence evidence dimension for Operational Resilience"}},{"id":"ni-resilience-44","testId":"ni-resilience-44","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Operational Resilience: Trend Readiness","description":"Validates historical comparability and timeline readiness for future reruns for degraded-mode resilience, timeout handling, and bounded reliability behavior. Evidence should include analysis ID, timestamp, and persistence evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Operational Resilience: Trend Readiness appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the trend readiness evidence for operational resilience, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-resilience-44","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["resilience","availability","reliability","performance","trend-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:resilience check:44","humanCommand":"Simulate degraded dependencies and verify stable fallback behavior; review the trend-readiness evidence dimension for Operational Resilience"}},{"id":"ni-resilience-45","testId":"ni-resilience-45","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Operational Resilience: Ranking Readiness","description":"Validates ranking input completeness and profile compatibility for degraded-mode resilience, timeout handling, and bounded reliability behavior. Evidence should include score and profile evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Operational Resilience: Ranking Readiness appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ranking readiness evidence for operational resilience, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-resilience-45","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["resilience","availability","reliability","performance","ranking-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:resilience check:45","humanCommand":"Simulate degraded dependencies and verify stable fallback behavior; review the ranking-readiness evidence dimension for Operational Resilience"}},{"id":"ni-resilience-46","testId":"ni-resilience-46","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Operational Resilience: Network Contribution","description":"Validates PlatPhorm network contribution through discovery, integrations, and standards compliance for degraded-mode resilience, timeout handling, and bounded reliability behavior. Evidence should include network graph and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Operational Resilience: Network Contribution appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the network contribution evidence for operational resilience, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-resilience-46","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["resilience","availability","reliability","performance","network-contribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:resilience check:46","humanCommand":"Simulate degraded dependencies and verify stable fallback behavior; review the network-contribution evidence dimension for Operational Resilience"}},{"id":"ni-resilience-47","testId":"ni-resilience-47","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Operational Resilience: Report Readiness","description":"Validates report/export categorization with public-safe evidence and protected boundaries for degraded-mode resilience, timeout handling, and bounded reliability behavior. Evidence should include report section mapping evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Operational Resilience: Report Readiness appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the report readiness evidence for operational resilience, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-resilience-47","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["resilience","availability","reliability","performance","report-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:resilience check:47","humanCommand":"Simulate degraded dependencies and verify stable fallback behavior; review the report-readiness evidence dimension for Operational Resilience"}},{"id":"ni-resilience-48","testId":"ni-resilience-48","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Operational Resilience: Operator Actionability","description":"Validates clear remediation, owner action, difficulty, and retest path for degraded-mode resilience, timeout handling, and bounded reliability behavior. Evidence should include fix instructions and command evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Operational Resilience: Operator Actionability appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the operator actionability evidence for operational resilience, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-resilience-48","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["resilience","availability","reliability","performance","operator-actionability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:resilience check:48","humanCommand":"Simulate degraded dependencies and verify stable fallback behavior; review the operator-actionability evidence dimension for Operational Resilience"}},{"id":"ni-resilience-49","testId":"ni-resilience-49","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Operational Resilience: Degraded State","description":"Validates honest degraded, unavailable, skipped, and not-applicable states for degraded-mode resilience, timeout handling, and bounded reliability behavior. Evidence should include status and storage evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Operational Resilience: Degraded State appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the degraded state evidence for operational resilience, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-resilience-49","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["resilience","availability","reliability","performance","degraded-state","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:resilience check:49","humanCommand":"Simulate degraded dependencies and verify stable fallback behavior; review the degraded-state evidence dimension for Operational Resilience"}},{"id":"ni-resilience-50","testId":"ni-resilience-50","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Operational Resilience: Reproducibility","description":"Validates stable CLI/API/human reproduction path and deterministic rerun instructions for degraded-mode resilience, timeout handling, and bounded reliability behavior. Evidence should include commands and registry version evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Operational Resilience: Reproducibility appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the reproducibility evidence for operational resilience, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-resilience-50","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["resilience","availability","reliability","performance","reproducibility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:resilience check:50","humanCommand":"Simulate degraded dependencies and verify stable fallback behavior; review the reproducibility evidence dimension for Operational Resilience"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-01","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-01","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Availability","description":"Validates public route availability and successful bounded fetch behavior for command line argument handling, deterministic config parsing, and execution integrity. Evidence should include HTTP status, timeout, and redirect evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Availability appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the availability evidence for sitespeed cli semantics, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-01","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli","config","deterministic","availability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/docs').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli check:1","humanCommand":"Cross-check CLI-driven analysis modes against sitespeed cliTests patterns; review the availability evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Semantics"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-02","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-02","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Public Safety","description":"Validates public-safe access boundaries without exposing private or protected data for command line argument handling, deterministic config parsing, and execution integrity. Evidence should include route policy and response-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Public Safety appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the public safety evidence for sitespeed cli semantics, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-02","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli","config","deterministic","public-safety","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/docs').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli check:2","humanCommand":"Cross-check CLI-driven analysis modes against sitespeed cliTests patterns; review the public-safety evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Semantics"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-03","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-03","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Canonical Url","description":"Validates canonical URL stability and normalized route identity for command line argument handling, deterministic config parsing, and execution integrity. Evidence should include canonical tags, redirects, and normalized URL evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Canonical Url appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the canonical url evidence for sitespeed cli semantics, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-03","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli","config","deterministic","canonical-url","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/docs').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli check:3","humanCommand":"Cross-check CLI-driven analysis modes against sitespeed cliTests patterns; review the canonical-url evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Semantics"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-04","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-04","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Metadata Clarity","description":"Validates title, description, and page-specific metadata clarity for command line argument handling, deterministic config parsing, and execution integrity. Evidence should include HTML metadata and extracted text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Metadata Clarity appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the metadata clarity evidence for sitespeed cli semantics, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-04","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli","config","deterministic","metadata-clarity","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/docs').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli check:4","humanCommand":"Cross-check CLI-driven analysis modes against sitespeed cliTests patterns; review the metadata-clarity evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Semantics"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-05","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-05","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Semantic Structure","description":"Validates semantic HTML structure for humans, agents, and assistive technology for command line argument handling, deterministic config parsing, and execution integrity. Evidence should include heading, landmark, and element evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Semantic Structure appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the semantic structure evidence for sitespeed cli semantics, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-05","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli","config","deterministic","semantic-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/docs').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli check:5","humanCommand":"Cross-check CLI-driven analysis modes against sitespeed cliTests patterns; review the semantic-structure evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Semantics"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-06","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-06","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Machine Readability","description":"Validates machine-readable public content and predictable parsing surfaces for command line argument handling, deterministic config parsing, and execution integrity. Evidence should include structured tags, JSON-LD, and document-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Machine Readability appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the machine readability evidence for sitespeed cli semantics, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-06","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli","config","deterministic","machine-readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/docs').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli check:6","humanCommand":"Cross-check CLI-driven analysis modes against sitespeed cliTests patterns; review the machine-readability evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Semantics"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-07","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-07","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Agent Discovery","description":"Validates agent discovery hints and AI-readable policy/documentation signals for command line argument handling, deterministic config parsing, and execution integrity. Evidence should include llms, policy, MCP, OpenAPI, or schema evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Agent Discovery appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the agent discovery evidence for sitespeed cli semantics, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-07","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli","config","deterministic","agent-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/docs').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli check:7","humanCommand":"Cross-check CLI-driven analysis modes against sitespeed cliTests patterns; review the agent-discovery evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Semantics"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-08","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-08","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Crawler Discovery","description":"Validates crawler discovery paths through robots, sitemap, feeds, and canonical links for command line argument handling, deterministic config parsing, and execution integrity. Evidence should include discovery artifact and link evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Crawler Discovery appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the crawler discovery evidence for sitespeed cli semantics, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-08","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli","config","deterministic","crawler-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/docs').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli check:8","humanCommand":"Cross-check CLI-driven analysis modes against sitespeed cliTests patterns; review the crawler-discovery evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Semantics"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-09","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-09","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Answerability","description":"Validates direct answer extraction and quotable explanatory content for command line argument handling, deterministic config parsing, and execution integrity. Evidence should include question, summary, heading, and paragraph evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Answerability appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the answerability evidence for sitespeed cli semantics, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-09","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli","config","deterministic","answerability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/docs').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli check:9","humanCommand":"Cross-check CLI-driven analysis modes against sitespeed cliTests patterns; review the answerability evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Semantics"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-10","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-10","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Generative Context","description":"Validates GEO context quality for generative engines without inventing measured facts for command line argument handling, deterministic config parsing, and execution integrity. Evidence should include entity, source, and instruction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Generative Context appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the generative context evidence for sitespeed cli semantics, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-10","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli","config","deterministic","generative-context","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/docs').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli check:10","humanCommand":"Cross-check CLI-driven analysis modes against sitespeed cliTests patterns; review the generative-context evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Semantics"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-11","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-11","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Search Intent","description":"Validates search intent alignment and snippet-friendly content structure for command line argument handling, deterministic config parsing, and execution integrity. Evidence should include metadata, headings, and topical text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Search Intent appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the search intent evidence for sitespeed cli semantics, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-11","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli","config","deterministic","search-intent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/docs').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli check:11","humanCommand":"Cross-check CLI-driven analysis modes against sitespeed cliTests patterns; review the search-intent evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Semantics"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-12","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-12","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Accessibility Semantics","description":"Validates accessible names, relationships, landmarks, and keyboard-relevant structure for command line argument handling, deterministic config parsing, and execution integrity. Evidence should include ARIA, labels, landmarks, and control evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Accessibility Semantics appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the accessibility semantics evidence for sitespeed cli semantics, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-12","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli","config","deterministic","accessibility-semantics","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/docs').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli check:12","humanCommand":"Cross-check CLI-driven analysis modes against sitespeed cliTests patterns; review the accessibility-semantics evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Semantics"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-13","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-13","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Mobile Readiness","description":"Validates mobile viewport, responsive content, and touch-friendly layout signals for command line argument handling, deterministic config parsing, and execution integrity. Evidence should include viewport and responsive asset evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Mobile Readiness appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the mobile readiness evidence for sitespeed cli semantics, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-13","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli","config","deterministic","mobile-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/docs').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli check:13","humanCommand":"Cross-check CLI-driven analysis modes against sitespeed cliTests patterns; review the mobile-readiness evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Semantics"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-14","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-14","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Performance Budget","description":"Validates performance budget compliance using measured or bounded deterministic inputs for command line argument handling, deterministic config parsing, and execution integrity. Evidence should include timing, byte, and Lighthouse-derived evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Performance Budget appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the performance budget evidence for sitespeed cli semantics, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-14","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli","config","deterministic","performance-budget","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/docs').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli check:14","humanCommand":"Cross-check CLI-driven analysis modes against sitespeed cliTests patterns; review the performance-budget evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Semantics"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-15","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-15","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Resource Efficiency","description":"Validates resource size, script/style count, and optimization opportunity signals for command line argument handling, deterministic config parsing, and execution integrity. Evidence should include resource and markup evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Resource Efficiency appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the resource efficiency evidence for sitespeed cli semantics, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-15","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli","config","deterministic","resource-efficiency","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/docs').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli check:15","humanCommand":"Cross-check CLI-driven analysis modes against sitespeed cliTests patterns; review the resource-efficiency evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Semantics"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-16","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-16","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Cache Freshness","description":"Validates cache behavior, freshness hints, and stale-content risk for command line argument handling, deterministic config parsing, and execution integrity. Evidence should include HTTP cache and timestamp evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Cache Freshness appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the cache freshness evidence for sitespeed cli semantics, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-16","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli","config","deterministic","cache-freshness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/docs').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli check:16","humanCommand":"Cross-check CLI-driven analysis modes against sitespeed cliTests patterns; review the cache-freshness evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Semantics"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-17","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-17","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Route Reliability","description":"Validates route reliability, redirect safety, and dead-link risk for command line argument handling, deterministic config parsing, and execution integrity. Evidence should include status, redirect, and sitemap evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Route Reliability appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the route reliability evidence for sitespeed cli semantics, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-17","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli","config","deterministic","route-reliability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/docs').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli check:17","humanCommand":"Cross-check CLI-driven analysis modes against sitespeed cliTests patterns; review the route-reliability evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Semantics"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-18","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-18","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Feed Quality","description":"Validates RSS/Atom/feed usefulness, parseability, and freshness for command line argument handling, deterministic config parsing, and execution integrity. Evidence should include feed XML and item evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Feed Quality appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the feed quality evidence for sitespeed cli semantics, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-18","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli","config","deterministic","feed-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/docs').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli check:18","humanCommand":"Cross-check CLI-driven analysis modes against sitespeed cliTests patterns; review the feed-quality evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Semantics"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-19","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-19","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Sitemap Quality","description":"Validates sitemap validity, public-safe URL coverage, and no-dead-link policy for command line argument handling, deterministic config parsing, and execution integrity. Evidence should include sitemap XML and bounded link-check evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Sitemap Quality appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the sitemap quality evidence for sitespeed cli semantics, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-19","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli","config","deterministic","sitemap-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/docs').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli check:19","humanCommand":"Cross-check CLI-driven analysis modes against sitespeed cliTests patterns; review the sitemap-quality evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Semantics"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-20","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-20","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Robots Alignment","description":"Validates robots.txt alignment with public/protected policy and sitemap discovery for command line argument handling, deterministic config parsing, and execution integrity. Evidence should include robots directives and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Robots Alignment appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the robots alignment evidence for sitespeed cli semantics, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-20","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli","config","deterministic","robots-alignment","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/docs').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli check:20","humanCommand":"Cross-check CLI-driven analysis modes against sitespeed cliTests patterns; review the robots-alignment evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Semantics"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-21","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-21","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Llms Structure","description":"Validates llms.txt structure, readability, endpoint coverage, and agent usefulness for command line argument handling, deterministic config parsing, and execution integrity. Evidence should include plain-text section and line-length evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Llms Structure appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms structure evidence for sitespeed cli semantics, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-21","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli","config","deterministic","llms-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/docs').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli check:21","humanCommand":"Cross-check CLI-driven analysis modes against sitespeed cliTests patterns; review the llms-structure evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Semantics"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-22","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-22","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Llms Index Schema","description":"Validates llms-index JSON schema shape and count reconciliation for command line argument handling, deterministic config parsing, and execution integrity. Evidence should include JSON keys, counts, and endpoint evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Llms Index Schema appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms index schema evidence for sitespeed cli semantics, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-22","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli","config","deterministic","llms-index-schema","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/docs').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli check:22","humanCommand":"Cross-check CLI-driven analysis modes against sitespeed cliTests patterns; review the llms-index-schema evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Semantics"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-23","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-23","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Humans Attribution","description":"Validates humans.txt attribution, maintainer, technology, and governance transparency for command line argument handling, deterministic config parsing, and execution integrity. Evidence should include humans.txt section evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Humans Attribution appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the humans attribution evidence for sitespeed cli semantics, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-23","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli","config","deterministic","humans-attribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/docs').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli check:23","humanCommand":"Cross-check CLI-driven analysis modes against sitespeed cliTests patterns; review the humans-attribution evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Semantics"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-24","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-24","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Agent Policy","description":"Validates agent-policy JSON clarity for allowed, disallowed, and protected operations for command line argument handling, deterministic config parsing, and execution integrity. Evidence should include well-known policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Agent Policy appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the agent policy evidence for sitespeed cli semantics, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-24","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli","config","deterministic","agent-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/docs').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli check:24","humanCommand":"Cross-check CLI-driven analysis modes against sitespeed cliTests patterns; review the agent-policy evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Semantics"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-25","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-25","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Ai Policy","description":"Validates AI policy clarity for training, search, answer use, caching, and attribution for command line argument handling, deterministic config parsing, and execution integrity. Evidence should include well-known AI policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Ai Policy appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ai policy evidence for sitespeed cli semantics, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-25","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli","config","deterministic","ai-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/docs').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli check:25","humanCommand":"Cross-check CLI-driven analysis modes against sitespeed cliTests patterns; review the ai-policy evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Semantics"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-26","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-26","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Trust Policy","description":"Validates trust policy coverage for privacy, traceability, metadata, and protected actions for command line argument handling, deterministic config parsing, and execution integrity. Evidence should include trust.json evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Trust Policy appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the trust policy evidence for sitespeed cli semantics, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-26","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli","config","deterministic","trust-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/docs').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli check:26","humanCommand":"Cross-check CLI-driven analysis modes against sitespeed cliTests patterns; review the trust-policy evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Semantics"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-27","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-27","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Openapi Contract","description":"Validates OpenAPI availability, server URL accuracy, schemas, and auth policy for command line argument handling, deterministic config parsing, and execution integrity. Evidence should include OpenAPI text/JSON evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Openapi Contract appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the openapi contract evidence for sitespeed cli semantics, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-27","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli","config","deterministic","openapi-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/docs').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli check:27","humanCommand":"Cross-check CLI-driven analysis modes against sitespeed cliTests patterns; review the openapi-contract evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Semantics"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-28","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-28","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Mcp Contract","description":"Validates MCP JSON-RPC introspection, real tools, resources, and protected boundaries for command line argument handling, deterministic config parsing, and execution integrity. Evidence should include MCP manifest and initialize evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Mcp Contract appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the mcp contract evidence for sitespeed cli semantics, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-28","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli","config","deterministic","mcp-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/docs').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli check:28","humanCommand":"Cross-check CLI-driven analysis modes against sitespeed cliTests patterns; review the mcp-contract evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Semantics"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-29","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-29","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Api Error Shape","description":"Validates API success/error response shape consistency for command line argument handling, deterministic config parsing, and execution integrity. Evidence should include REST envelope evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Api Error Shape appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the api error shape evidence for sitespeed cli semantics, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-29","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli","config","deterministic","api-error-shape","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/docs').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli check:29","humanCommand":"Cross-check CLI-driven analysis modes against sitespeed cliTests patterns; review the api-error-shape evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Semantics"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-30","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-30","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Traceability","description":"Validates trace propagation, request IDs, and safe observability correlation for command line argument handling, deterministic config parsing, and execution integrity. Evidence should include trace header and metadata evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Traceability appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the traceability evidence for sitespeed cli semantics, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-30","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli","config","deterministic","traceability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/docs').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli check:30","humanCommand":"Cross-check CLI-driven analysis modes against sitespeed cliTests patterns; review the traceability evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Semantics"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-31","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-31","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Ja4 Redaction","description":"Validates fingerprint-adjacent metadata redaction and non-public raw JA4 handling for command line argument handling, deterministic config parsing, and execution integrity. Evidence should include metadata policy and redaction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Ja4 Redaction appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the ja4 redaction evidence for sitespeed cli semantics, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-31","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli","config","deterministic","ja4-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/docs').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli check:31","humanCommand":"Cross-check CLI-driven analysis modes against sitespeed cliTests patterns; review the ja4-redaction evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Semantics"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-32","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-32","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Secret Redaction","description":"Validates absence of secrets, generic key examples, cookies, and raw tokens in public outputs for command line argument handling, deterministic config parsing, and execution integrity. Evidence should include public artifact scan evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Secret Redaction appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the secret redaction evidence for sitespeed cli semantics, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-32","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli","config","deterministic","secret-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/docs').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli check:32","humanCommand":"Cross-check CLI-driven analysis modes against sitespeed cliTests patterns; review the secret-redaction evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Semantics"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-33","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-33","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Security Headers","description":"Validates security header coverage and hardened transport signals for command line argument handling, deterministic config parsing, and execution integrity. Evidence should include HTTP header evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Security Headers appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the security headers evidence for sitespeed cli semantics, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-33","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli","config","deterministic","security-headers","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/docs').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli check:33","humanCommand":"Cross-check CLI-driven analysis modes against sitespeed cliTests patterns; review the security-headers evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Semantics"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-34","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-34","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Privacy Consent","description":"Validates privacy policy, consent, attribution, and data-use disclosure quality for command line argument handling, deterministic config parsing, and execution integrity. Evidence should include public page and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Privacy Consent appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the privacy consent evidence for sitespeed cli semantics, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-34","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli","config","deterministic","privacy-consent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/docs').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli check:34","humanCommand":"Cross-check CLI-driven analysis modes against sitespeed cliTests patterns; review the privacy-consent evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Semantics"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-35","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-35","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Structured Data","description":"Validates JSON-LD and entity modeling for machine interpretation for command line argument handling, deterministic config parsing, and execution integrity. Evidence should include schema block and parse evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Structured Data appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the structured data evidence for sitespeed cli semantics, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-35","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli","config","deterministic","structured-data","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/docs').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli check:35","humanCommand":"Cross-check CLI-driven analysis modes against sitespeed cliTests patterns; review the structured-data evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Semantics"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-36","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-36","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Social Preview","description":"Validates Open Graph and Twitter/X card readiness for public sharing for command line argument handling, deterministic config parsing, and execution integrity. Evidence should include meta tag evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Social Preview appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the social preview evidence for sitespeed cli semantics, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-36","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli","config","deterministic","social-preview","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/docs').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli check:36","humanCommand":"Cross-check CLI-driven analysis modes against sitespeed cliTests patterns; review the social-preview evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Semantics"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-37","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-37","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: I18n Routing","description":"Validates locale route, hreflang, language declaration, and translation readiness for command line argument handling, deterministic config parsing, and execution integrity. Evidence should include lang/hreflang and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: I18n Routing appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the i18n routing evidence for sitespeed cli semantics, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-37","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli","config","deterministic","i18n-routing","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/docs').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli check:37","humanCommand":"Cross-check CLI-driven analysis modes against sitespeed cliTests patterns; review the i18n-routing evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Semantics"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-38","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-38","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Readability","description":"Validates human readability, sectioning, sentence complexity, and comprehension support for command line argument handling, deterministic config parsing, and execution integrity. Evidence should include extracted content evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Readability appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the readability evidence for sitespeed cli semantics, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-38","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli","config","deterministic","readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/docs').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli check:38","humanCommand":"Cross-check CLI-driven analysis modes against sitespeed cliTests patterns; review the readability evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Semantics"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-39","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-39","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Content Utility","description":"Validates non-placeholder content usefulness and domain-specific public value for command line argument handling, deterministic config parsing, and execution integrity. Evidence should include content extraction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Content Utility appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the content utility evidence for sitespeed cli semantics, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-39","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli","config","deterministic","content-utility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/docs').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli check:39","humanCommand":"Cross-check CLI-driven analysis modes against sitespeed cliTests patterns; review the content-utility evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Semantics"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-40","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-40","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Recommendation Grounding","description":"Validates recommendation grounding in deterministic evidence instead of fabricated model output for command line argument handling, deterministic config parsing, and execution integrity. Evidence should include issue and remediation evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Recommendation Grounding appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the recommendation grounding evidence for sitespeed cli semantics, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-40","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli","config","deterministic","recommendation-grounding","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/docs').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli check:40","humanCommand":"Cross-check CLI-driven analysis modes against sitespeed cliTests patterns; review the recommendation-grounding evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Semantics"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-41","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-41","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Evidence Quality","description":"Validates evidence completeness, public safety, and reproducibility for command line argument handling, deterministic config parsing, and execution integrity. Evidence should include test output and artifact evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Evidence Quality appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the evidence quality evidence for sitespeed cli semantics, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-41","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli","config","deterministic","evidence-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/docs').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli check:41","humanCommand":"Cross-check CLI-driven analysis modes against sitespeed cliTests patterns; review the evidence-quality evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Semantics"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-42","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-42","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Threshold Policy","description":"Validates threshold clarity, pass/warn/fail semantics, and scoring transparency for command line argument handling, deterministic config parsing, and execution integrity. Evidence should include threshold and result status evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Threshold Policy appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the threshold policy evidence for sitespeed cli semantics, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-42","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli","config","deterministic","threshold-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/docs').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli check:42","humanCommand":"Cross-check CLI-driven analysis modes against sitespeed cliTests patterns; review the threshold-policy evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Semantics"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-43","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-43","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Confidence","description":"Validates confidence scoring and degraded-input disclosure for command line argument handling, deterministic config parsing, and execution integrity. Evidence should include source freshness and input availability evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Confidence appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the confidence evidence for sitespeed cli semantics, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-43","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli","config","deterministic","confidence","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/docs').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli check:43","humanCommand":"Cross-check CLI-driven analysis modes against sitespeed cliTests patterns; review the confidence evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Semantics"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-44","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-44","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Trend Readiness","description":"Validates historical comparability and timeline readiness for future reruns for command line argument handling, deterministic config parsing, and execution integrity. Evidence should include analysis ID, timestamp, and persistence evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Trend Readiness appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the trend readiness evidence for sitespeed cli semantics, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-44","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli","config","deterministic","trend-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/docs').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli check:44","humanCommand":"Cross-check CLI-driven analysis modes against sitespeed cliTests patterns; review the trend-readiness evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Semantics"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-45","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-45","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Ranking Readiness","description":"Validates ranking input completeness and profile compatibility for command line argument handling, deterministic config parsing, and execution integrity. Evidence should include score and profile evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Ranking Readiness appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ranking readiness evidence for sitespeed cli semantics, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-45","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli","config","deterministic","ranking-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/docs').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli check:45","humanCommand":"Cross-check CLI-driven analysis modes against sitespeed cliTests patterns; review the ranking-readiness evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Semantics"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-46","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-46","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Network Contribution","description":"Validates PlatPhorm network contribution through discovery, integrations, and standards compliance for command line argument handling, deterministic config parsing, and execution integrity. Evidence should include network graph and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Network Contribution appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the network contribution evidence for sitespeed cli semantics, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-46","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli","config","deterministic","network-contribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/docs').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli check:46","humanCommand":"Cross-check CLI-driven analysis modes against sitespeed cliTests patterns; review the network-contribution evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Semantics"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-47","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-47","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Report Readiness","description":"Validates report/export categorization with public-safe evidence and protected boundaries for command line argument handling, deterministic config parsing, and execution integrity. Evidence should include report section mapping evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Report Readiness appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the report readiness evidence for sitespeed cli semantics, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-47","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli","config","deterministic","report-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/docs').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli check:47","humanCommand":"Cross-check CLI-driven analysis modes against sitespeed cliTests patterns; review the report-readiness evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Semantics"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-48","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-48","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Operator Actionability","description":"Validates clear remediation, owner action, difficulty, and retest path for command line argument handling, deterministic config parsing, and execution integrity. Evidence should include fix instructions and command evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Operator Actionability appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the operator actionability evidence for sitespeed cli semantics, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-48","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli","config","deterministic","operator-actionability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/docs').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli check:48","humanCommand":"Cross-check CLI-driven analysis modes against sitespeed cliTests patterns; review the operator-actionability evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Semantics"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-49","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-49","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Degraded State","description":"Validates honest degraded, unavailable, skipped, and not-applicable states for command line argument handling, deterministic config parsing, and execution integrity. Evidence should include status and storage evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Degraded State appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the degraded state evidence for sitespeed cli semantics, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-49","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli","config","deterministic","degraded-state","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/docs').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli check:49","humanCommand":"Cross-check CLI-driven analysis modes against sitespeed cliTests patterns; review the degraded-state evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Semantics"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-50","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-50","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Reproducibility","description":"Validates stable CLI/API/human reproduction path and deterministic rerun instructions for command line argument handling, deterministic config parsing, and execution integrity. Evidence should include commands and registry version evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Semantics: Reproducibility appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the reproducibility evidence for sitespeed cli semantics, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-50","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli","config","deterministic","reproducibility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/docs').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli check:50","humanCommand":"Cross-check CLI-driven analysis modes against sitespeed cliTests patterns; review the reproducibility evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Semantics"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-01","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-01","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Availability","description":"Validates public route availability and successful bounded fetch behavior for utility argument normalization, defaults, and safe command behavior. Evidence should include HTTP status, timeout, and redirect evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Availability appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the availability evidence for sitespeed cli utility coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-util-01","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli-util","quality","deterministic","availability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli-util check:1","humanCommand":"Compare utility command coverage with sitespeed cliUtilTests expectations; review the availability evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-02","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-02","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Public Safety","description":"Validates public-safe access boundaries without exposing private or protected data for utility argument normalization, defaults, and safe command behavior. Evidence should include route policy and response-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Public Safety appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the public safety evidence for sitespeed cli utility coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-util-02","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli-util","quality","deterministic","public-safety","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli-util check:2","humanCommand":"Compare utility command coverage with sitespeed cliUtilTests expectations; review the public-safety evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-03","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-03","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Canonical Url","description":"Validates canonical URL stability and normalized route identity for utility argument normalization, defaults, and safe command behavior. Evidence should include canonical tags, redirects, and normalized URL evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Canonical Url appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the canonical url evidence for sitespeed cli utility coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-util-03","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli-util","quality","deterministic","canonical-url","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli-util check:3","humanCommand":"Compare utility command coverage with sitespeed cliUtilTests expectations; review the canonical-url evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-04","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-04","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Metadata Clarity","description":"Validates title, description, and page-specific metadata clarity for utility argument normalization, defaults, and safe command behavior. Evidence should include HTML metadata and extracted text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Metadata Clarity appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the metadata clarity evidence for sitespeed cli utility coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-util-04","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli-util","quality","deterministic","metadata-clarity","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli-util check:4","humanCommand":"Compare utility command coverage with sitespeed cliUtilTests expectations; review the metadata-clarity evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-05","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-05","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Semantic Structure","description":"Validates semantic HTML structure for humans, agents, and assistive technology for utility argument normalization, defaults, and safe command behavior. Evidence should include heading, landmark, and element evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Semantic Structure appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the semantic structure evidence for sitespeed cli utility coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-util-05","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli-util","quality","deterministic","semantic-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli-util check:5","humanCommand":"Compare utility command coverage with sitespeed cliUtilTests expectations; review the semantic-structure evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-06","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-06","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Machine Readability","description":"Validates machine-readable public content and predictable parsing surfaces for utility argument normalization, defaults, and safe command behavior. Evidence should include structured tags, JSON-LD, and document-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Machine Readability appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the machine readability evidence for sitespeed cli utility coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-util-06","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli-util","quality","deterministic","machine-readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli-util check:6","humanCommand":"Compare utility command coverage with sitespeed cliUtilTests expectations; review the machine-readability evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-07","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-07","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Agent Discovery","description":"Validates agent discovery hints and AI-readable policy/documentation signals for utility argument normalization, defaults, and safe command behavior. Evidence should include llms, policy, MCP, OpenAPI, or schema evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Agent Discovery appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the agent discovery evidence for sitespeed cli utility coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-util-07","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli-util","quality","deterministic","agent-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli-util check:7","humanCommand":"Compare utility command coverage with sitespeed cliUtilTests expectations; review the agent-discovery evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-08","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-08","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Crawler Discovery","description":"Validates crawler discovery paths through robots, sitemap, feeds, and canonical links for utility argument normalization, defaults, and safe command behavior. Evidence should include discovery artifact and link evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Crawler Discovery appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the crawler discovery evidence for sitespeed cli utility coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-util-08","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli-util","quality","deterministic","crawler-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli-util check:8","humanCommand":"Compare utility command coverage with sitespeed cliUtilTests expectations; review the crawler-discovery evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-09","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-09","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Answerability","description":"Validates direct answer extraction and quotable explanatory content for utility argument normalization, defaults, and safe command behavior. Evidence should include question, summary, heading, and paragraph evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Answerability appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the answerability evidence for sitespeed cli utility coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-util-09","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli-util","quality","deterministic","answerability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli-util check:9","humanCommand":"Compare utility command coverage with sitespeed cliUtilTests expectations; review the answerability evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-10","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-10","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Generative Context","description":"Validates GEO context quality for generative engines without inventing measured facts for utility argument normalization, defaults, and safe command behavior. Evidence should include entity, source, and instruction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Generative Context appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the generative context evidence for sitespeed cli utility coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-util-10","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli-util","quality","deterministic","generative-context","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli-util check:10","humanCommand":"Compare utility command coverage with sitespeed cliUtilTests expectations; review the generative-context evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-11","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-11","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Search Intent","description":"Validates search intent alignment and snippet-friendly content structure for utility argument normalization, defaults, and safe command behavior. Evidence should include metadata, headings, and topical text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Search Intent appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the search intent evidence for sitespeed cli utility coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-util-11","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli-util","quality","deterministic","search-intent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli-util check:11","humanCommand":"Compare utility command coverage with sitespeed cliUtilTests expectations; review the search-intent evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-12","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-12","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Accessibility Semantics","description":"Validates accessible names, relationships, landmarks, and keyboard-relevant structure for utility argument normalization, defaults, and safe command behavior. Evidence should include ARIA, labels, landmarks, and control evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Accessibility Semantics appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the accessibility semantics evidence for sitespeed cli utility coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-util-12","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli-util","quality","deterministic","accessibility-semantics","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli-util check:12","humanCommand":"Compare utility command coverage with sitespeed cliUtilTests expectations; review the accessibility-semantics evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-13","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-13","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Mobile Readiness","description":"Validates mobile viewport, responsive content, and touch-friendly layout signals for utility argument normalization, defaults, and safe command behavior. Evidence should include viewport and responsive asset evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Mobile Readiness appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the mobile readiness evidence for sitespeed cli utility coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-util-13","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli-util","quality","deterministic","mobile-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli-util check:13","humanCommand":"Compare utility command coverage with sitespeed cliUtilTests expectations; review the mobile-readiness evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-14","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-14","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Performance Budget","description":"Validates performance budget compliance using measured or bounded deterministic inputs for utility argument normalization, defaults, and safe command behavior. Evidence should include timing, byte, and Lighthouse-derived evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Performance Budget appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the performance budget evidence for sitespeed cli utility coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-util-14","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli-util","quality","deterministic","performance-budget","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli-util check:14","humanCommand":"Compare utility command coverage with sitespeed cliUtilTests expectations; review the performance-budget evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-15","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-15","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Resource Efficiency","description":"Validates resource size, script/style count, and optimization opportunity signals for utility argument normalization, defaults, and safe command behavior. Evidence should include resource and markup evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Resource Efficiency appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the resource efficiency evidence for sitespeed cli utility coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-util-15","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli-util","quality","deterministic","resource-efficiency","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli-util check:15","humanCommand":"Compare utility command coverage with sitespeed cliUtilTests expectations; review the resource-efficiency evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-16","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-16","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Cache Freshness","description":"Validates cache behavior, freshness hints, and stale-content risk for utility argument normalization, defaults, and safe command behavior. Evidence should include HTTP cache and timestamp evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Cache Freshness appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the cache freshness evidence for sitespeed cli utility coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-util-16","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli-util","quality","deterministic","cache-freshness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli-util check:16","humanCommand":"Compare utility command coverage with sitespeed cliUtilTests expectations; review the cache-freshness evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-17","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-17","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Route Reliability","description":"Validates route reliability, redirect safety, and dead-link risk for utility argument normalization, defaults, and safe command behavior. Evidence should include status, redirect, and sitemap evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Route Reliability appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the route reliability evidence for sitespeed cli utility coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-util-17","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli-util","quality","deterministic","route-reliability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli-util check:17","humanCommand":"Compare utility command coverage with sitespeed cliUtilTests expectations; review the route-reliability evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-18","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-18","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Feed Quality","description":"Validates RSS/Atom/feed usefulness, parseability, and freshness for utility argument normalization, defaults, and safe command behavior. Evidence should include feed XML and item evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Feed Quality appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the feed quality evidence for sitespeed cli utility coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-util-18","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli-util","quality","deterministic","feed-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli-util check:18","humanCommand":"Compare utility command coverage with sitespeed cliUtilTests expectations; review the feed-quality evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-19","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-19","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Sitemap Quality","description":"Validates sitemap validity, public-safe URL coverage, and no-dead-link policy for utility argument normalization, defaults, and safe command behavior. Evidence should include sitemap XML and bounded link-check evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Sitemap Quality appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the sitemap quality evidence for sitespeed cli utility coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-util-19","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli-util","quality","deterministic","sitemap-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli-util check:19","humanCommand":"Compare utility command coverage with sitespeed cliUtilTests expectations; review the sitemap-quality evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-20","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-20","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Robots Alignment","description":"Validates robots.txt alignment with public/protected policy and sitemap discovery for utility argument normalization, defaults, and safe command behavior. Evidence should include robots directives and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Robots Alignment appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the robots alignment evidence for sitespeed cli utility coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-util-20","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli-util","quality","deterministic","robots-alignment","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli-util check:20","humanCommand":"Compare utility command coverage with sitespeed cliUtilTests expectations; review the robots-alignment evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-21","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-21","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Llms Structure","description":"Validates llms.txt structure, readability, endpoint coverage, and agent usefulness for utility argument normalization, defaults, and safe command behavior. Evidence should include plain-text section and line-length evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Llms Structure appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms structure evidence for sitespeed cli utility coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-util-21","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli-util","quality","deterministic","llms-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli-util check:21","humanCommand":"Compare utility command coverage with sitespeed cliUtilTests expectations; review the llms-structure evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-22","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-22","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Llms Index Schema","description":"Validates llms-index JSON schema shape and count reconciliation for utility argument normalization, defaults, and safe command behavior. Evidence should include JSON keys, counts, and endpoint evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Llms Index Schema appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms index schema evidence for sitespeed cli utility coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-util-22","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli-util","quality","deterministic","llms-index-schema","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli-util check:22","humanCommand":"Compare utility command coverage with sitespeed cliUtilTests expectations; review the llms-index-schema evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-23","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-23","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Humans Attribution","description":"Validates humans.txt attribution, maintainer, technology, and governance transparency for utility argument normalization, defaults, and safe command behavior. Evidence should include humans.txt section evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Humans Attribution appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the humans attribution evidence for sitespeed cli utility coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-util-23","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli-util","quality","deterministic","humans-attribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli-util check:23","humanCommand":"Compare utility command coverage with sitespeed cliUtilTests expectations; review the humans-attribution evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-24","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-24","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Agent Policy","description":"Validates agent-policy JSON clarity for allowed, disallowed, and protected operations for utility argument normalization, defaults, and safe command behavior. Evidence should include well-known policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Agent Policy appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the agent policy evidence for sitespeed cli utility coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-util-24","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli-util","quality","deterministic","agent-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli-util check:24","humanCommand":"Compare utility command coverage with sitespeed cliUtilTests expectations; review the agent-policy evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-25","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-25","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Ai Policy","description":"Validates AI policy clarity for training, search, answer use, caching, and attribution for utility argument normalization, defaults, and safe command behavior. Evidence should include well-known AI policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Ai Policy appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ai policy evidence for sitespeed cli utility coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-util-25","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli-util","quality","deterministic","ai-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli-util check:25","humanCommand":"Compare utility command coverage with sitespeed cliUtilTests expectations; review the ai-policy evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-26","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-26","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Trust Policy","description":"Validates trust policy coverage for privacy, traceability, metadata, and protected actions for utility argument normalization, defaults, and safe command behavior. Evidence should include trust.json evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Trust Policy appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the trust policy evidence for sitespeed cli utility coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-util-26","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli-util","quality","deterministic","trust-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli-util check:26","humanCommand":"Compare utility command coverage with sitespeed cliUtilTests expectations; review the trust-policy evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-27","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-27","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Openapi Contract","description":"Validates OpenAPI availability, server URL accuracy, schemas, and auth policy for utility argument normalization, defaults, and safe command behavior. Evidence should include OpenAPI text/JSON evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Openapi Contract appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the openapi contract evidence for sitespeed cli utility coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-util-27","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli-util","quality","deterministic","openapi-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli-util check:27","humanCommand":"Compare utility command coverage with sitespeed cliUtilTests expectations; review the openapi-contract evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-28","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-28","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Mcp Contract","description":"Validates MCP JSON-RPC introspection, real tools, resources, and protected boundaries for utility argument normalization, defaults, and safe command behavior. Evidence should include MCP manifest and initialize evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Mcp Contract appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the mcp contract evidence for sitespeed cli utility coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-util-28","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli-util","quality","deterministic","mcp-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli-util check:28","humanCommand":"Compare utility command coverage with sitespeed cliUtilTests expectations; review the mcp-contract evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-29","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-29","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Api Error Shape","description":"Validates API success/error response shape consistency for utility argument normalization, defaults, and safe command behavior. Evidence should include REST envelope evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Api Error Shape appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the api error shape evidence for sitespeed cli utility coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-util-29","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli-util","quality","deterministic","api-error-shape","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli-util check:29","humanCommand":"Compare utility command coverage with sitespeed cliUtilTests expectations; review the api-error-shape evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-30","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-30","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Traceability","description":"Validates trace propagation, request IDs, and safe observability correlation for utility argument normalization, defaults, and safe command behavior. Evidence should include trace header and metadata evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Traceability appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the traceability evidence for sitespeed cli utility coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-util-30","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli-util","quality","deterministic","traceability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli-util check:30","humanCommand":"Compare utility command coverage with sitespeed cliUtilTests expectations; review the traceability evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-31","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-31","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Ja4 Redaction","description":"Validates fingerprint-adjacent metadata redaction and non-public raw JA4 handling for utility argument normalization, defaults, and safe command behavior. Evidence should include metadata policy and redaction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Ja4 Redaction appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the ja4 redaction evidence for sitespeed cli utility coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-util-31","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli-util","quality","deterministic","ja4-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli-util check:31","humanCommand":"Compare utility command coverage with sitespeed cliUtilTests expectations; review the ja4-redaction evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-32","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-32","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Secret Redaction","description":"Validates absence of secrets, generic key examples, cookies, and raw tokens in public outputs for utility argument normalization, defaults, and safe command behavior. Evidence should include public artifact scan evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Secret Redaction appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the secret redaction evidence for sitespeed cli utility coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-util-32","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli-util","quality","deterministic","secret-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli-util check:32","humanCommand":"Compare utility command coverage with sitespeed cliUtilTests expectations; review the secret-redaction evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-33","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-33","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Security Headers","description":"Validates security header coverage and hardened transport signals for utility argument normalization, defaults, and safe command behavior. Evidence should include HTTP header evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Security Headers appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the security headers evidence for sitespeed cli utility coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-util-33","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli-util","quality","deterministic","security-headers","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli-util check:33","humanCommand":"Compare utility command coverage with sitespeed cliUtilTests expectations; review the security-headers evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-34","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-34","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Privacy Consent","description":"Validates privacy policy, consent, attribution, and data-use disclosure quality for utility argument normalization, defaults, and safe command behavior. Evidence should include public page and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Privacy Consent appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the privacy consent evidence for sitespeed cli utility coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-util-34","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli-util","quality","deterministic","privacy-consent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli-util check:34","humanCommand":"Compare utility command coverage with sitespeed cliUtilTests expectations; review the privacy-consent evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-35","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-35","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Structured Data","description":"Validates JSON-LD and entity modeling for machine interpretation for utility argument normalization, defaults, and safe command behavior. Evidence should include schema block and parse evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Structured Data appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the structured data evidence for sitespeed cli utility coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-util-35","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli-util","quality","deterministic","structured-data","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli-util check:35","humanCommand":"Compare utility command coverage with sitespeed cliUtilTests expectations; review the structured-data evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-36","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-36","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Social Preview","description":"Validates Open Graph and Twitter/X card readiness for public sharing for utility argument normalization, defaults, and safe command behavior. Evidence should include meta tag evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Social Preview appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the social preview evidence for sitespeed cli utility coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-util-36","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli-util","quality","deterministic","social-preview","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli-util check:36","humanCommand":"Compare utility command coverage with sitespeed cliUtilTests expectations; review the social-preview evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-37","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-37","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: I18n Routing","description":"Validates locale route, hreflang, language declaration, and translation readiness for utility argument normalization, defaults, and safe command behavior. Evidence should include lang/hreflang and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: I18n Routing appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the i18n routing evidence for sitespeed cli utility coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-util-37","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli-util","quality","deterministic","i18n-routing","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli-util check:37","humanCommand":"Compare utility command coverage with sitespeed cliUtilTests expectations; review the i18n-routing evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-38","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-38","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Readability","description":"Validates human readability, sectioning, sentence complexity, and comprehension support for utility argument normalization, defaults, and safe command behavior. Evidence should include extracted content evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Readability appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the readability evidence for sitespeed cli utility coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-util-38","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli-util","quality","deterministic","readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli-util check:38","humanCommand":"Compare utility command coverage with sitespeed cliUtilTests expectations; review the readability evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-39","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-39","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Content Utility","description":"Validates non-placeholder content usefulness and domain-specific public value for utility argument normalization, defaults, and safe command behavior. Evidence should include content extraction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Content Utility appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the content utility evidence for sitespeed cli utility coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-util-39","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli-util","quality","deterministic","content-utility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli-util check:39","humanCommand":"Compare utility command coverage with sitespeed cliUtilTests expectations; review the content-utility evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-40","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-40","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Recommendation Grounding","description":"Validates recommendation grounding in deterministic evidence instead of fabricated model output for utility argument normalization, defaults, and safe command behavior. Evidence should include issue and remediation evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Recommendation Grounding appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the recommendation grounding evidence for sitespeed cli utility coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-util-40","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli-util","quality","deterministic","recommendation-grounding","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli-util check:40","humanCommand":"Compare utility command coverage with sitespeed cliUtilTests expectations; review the recommendation-grounding evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-41","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-41","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Evidence Quality","description":"Validates evidence completeness, public safety, and reproducibility for utility argument normalization, defaults, and safe command behavior. Evidence should include test output and artifact evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Evidence Quality appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the evidence quality evidence for sitespeed cli utility coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-util-41","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli-util","quality","deterministic","evidence-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli-util check:41","humanCommand":"Compare utility command coverage with sitespeed cliUtilTests expectations; review the evidence-quality evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-42","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-42","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Threshold Policy","description":"Validates threshold clarity, pass/warn/fail semantics, and scoring transparency for utility argument normalization, defaults, and safe command behavior. Evidence should include threshold and result status evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Threshold Policy appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the threshold policy evidence for sitespeed cli utility coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-util-42","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli-util","quality","deterministic","threshold-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli-util check:42","humanCommand":"Compare utility command coverage with sitespeed cliUtilTests expectations; review the threshold-policy evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-43","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-43","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Confidence","description":"Validates confidence scoring and degraded-input disclosure for utility argument normalization, defaults, and safe command behavior. Evidence should include source freshness and input availability evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Confidence appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the confidence evidence for sitespeed cli utility coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-util-43","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli-util","quality","deterministic","confidence","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli-util check:43","humanCommand":"Compare utility command coverage with sitespeed cliUtilTests expectations; review the confidence evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-44","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-44","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Trend Readiness","description":"Validates historical comparability and timeline readiness for future reruns for utility argument normalization, defaults, and safe command behavior. Evidence should include analysis ID, timestamp, and persistence evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Trend Readiness appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the trend readiness evidence for sitespeed cli utility coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-util-44","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli-util","quality","deterministic","trend-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli-util check:44","humanCommand":"Compare utility command coverage with sitespeed cliUtilTests expectations; review the trend-readiness evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-45","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-45","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Ranking Readiness","description":"Validates ranking input completeness and profile compatibility for utility argument normalization, defaults, and safe command behavior. Evidence should include score and profile evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Ranking Readiness appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ranking readiness evidence for sitespeed cli utility coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-util-45","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli-util","quality","deterministic","ranking-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli-util check:45","humanCommand":"Compare utility command coverage with sitespeed cliUtilTests expectations; review the ranking-readiness evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-46","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-46","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Network Contribution","description":"Validates PlatPhorm network contribution through discovery, integrations, and standards compliance for utility argument normalization, defaults, and safe command behavior. Evidence should include network graph and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Network Contribution appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the network contribution evidence for sitespeed cli utility coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-util-46","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli-util","quality","deterministic","network-contribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli-util check:46","humanCommand":"Compare utility command coverage with sitespeed cliUtilTests expectations; review the network-contribution evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-47","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-47","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Report Readiness","description":"Validates report/export categorization with public-safe evidence and protected boundaries for utility argument normalization, defaults, and safe command behavior. Evidence should include report section mapping evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Report Readiness appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the report readiness evidence for sitespeed cli utility coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-util-47","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli-util","quality","deterministic","report-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli-util check:47","humanCommand":"Compare utility command coverage with sitespeed cliUtilTests expectations; review the report-readiness evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-48","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-48","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Operator Actionability","description":"Validates clear remediation, owner action, difficulty, and retest path for utility argument normalization, defaults, and safe command behavior. Evidence should include fix instructions and command evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Operator Actionability appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the operator actionability evidence for sitespeed cli utility coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-util-48","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli-util","quality","deterministic","operator-actionability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli-util check:48","humanCommand":"Compare utility command coverage with sitespeed cliUtilTests expectations; review the operator-actionability evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-49","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-49","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Degraded State","description":"Validates honest degraded, unavailable, skipped, and not-applicable states for utility argument normalization, defaults, and safe command behavior. Evidence should include status and storage evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Degraded State appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the degraded state evidence for sitespeed cli utility coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-util-49","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli-util","quality","deterministic","degraded-state","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli-util check:49","humanCommand":"Compare utility command coverage with sitespeed cliUtilTests expectations; review the degraded-state evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-50","testId":"ni-sitespeed-cli-util-50","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Reproducibility","description":"Validates stable CLI/API/human reproduction path and deterministic rerun instructions for utility argument normalization, defaults, and safe command behavior. Evidence should include commands and registry version evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage: Reproducibility appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the reproducibility evidence for sitespeed cli utility coverage, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-cli-util-50","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","cli-util","quality","deterministic","reproducibility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/tests/registry').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-cli-util check:50","humanCommand":"Compare utility command coverage with sitespeed cliUtilTests expectations; review the reproducibility evidence dimension for Sitespeed CLI Utility Coverage"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-coach-01","testId":"ni-sitespeed-coach-01","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Availability","description":"Validates public route availability and successful bounded fetch behavior for coaching hints for performance and quality improvements from measured evidence. Evidence should include HTTP status, timeout, and redirect evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Availability appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the availability evidence for sitespeed coach signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-coach-01","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","coach","performance","recommendations","availability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/scoring/new-internet',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({analysisId:'example'})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-coach check:1","humanCommand":"Review optimization guidance quality against sitespeed coachTests principles; review the availability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Coach Signals"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-coach-02","testId":"ni-sitespeed-coach-02","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Public Safety","description":"Validates public-safe access boundaries without exposing private or protected data for coaching hints for performance and quality improvements from measured evidence. Evidence should include route policy and response-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Public Safety appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the public safety evidence for sitespeed coach signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-coach-02","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","coach","performance","recommendations","public-safety","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/scoring/new-internet',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({analysisId:'example'})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-coach check:2","humanCommand":"Review optimization guidance quality against sitespeed coachTests principles; review the public-safety evidence dimension for Sitespeed Coach Signals"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-coach-03","testId":"ni-sitespeed-coach-03","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Canonical Url","description":"Validates canonical URL stability and normalized route identity for coaching hints for performance and quality improvements from measured evidence. Evidence should include canonical tags, redirects, and normalized URL evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Canonical Url appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the canonical url evidence for sitespeed coach signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-coach-03","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","coach","performance","recommendations","canonical-url","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/scoring/new-internet',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({analysisId:'example'})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-coach check:3","humanCommand":"Review optimization guidance quality against sitespeed coachTests principles; review the canonical-url evidence dimension for Sitespeed Coach Signals"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-coach-04","testId":"ni-sitespeed-coach-04","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Metadata Clarity","description":"Validates title, description, and page-specific metadata clarity for coaching hints for performance and quality improvements from measured evidence. Evidence should include HTML metadata and extracted text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Metadata Clarity appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the metadata clarity evidence for sitespeed coach signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-coach-04","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","coach","performance","recommendations","metadata-clarity","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/scoring/new-internet',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({analysisId:'example'})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-coach check:4","humanCommand":"Review optimization guidance quality against sitespeed coachTests principles; review the metadata-clarity evidence dimension for Sitespeed Coach Signals"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-coach-05","testId":"ni-sitespeed-coach-05","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Semantic Structure","description":"Validates semantic HTML structure for humans, agents, and assistive technology for coaching hints for performance and quality improvements from measured evidence. Evidence should include heading, landmark, and element evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Semantic Structure appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the semantic structure evidence for sitespeed coach signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-coach-05","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","coach","performance","recommendations","semantic-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/scoring/new-internet',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({analysisId:'example'})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-coach check:5","humanCommand":"Review optimization guidance quality against sitespeed coachTests principles; review the semantic-structure evidence dimension for Sitespeed Coach Signals"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-coach-06","testId":"ni-sitespeed-coach-06","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Machine Readability","description":"Validates machine-readable public content and predictable parsing surfaces for coaching hints for performance and quality improvements from measured evidence. Evidence should include structured tags, JSON-LD, and document-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Machine Readability appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the machine readability evidence for sitespeed coach signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-coach-06","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","coach","performance","recommendations","machine-readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/scoring/new-internet',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({analysisId:'example'})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-coach check:6","humanCommand":"Review optimization guidance quality against sitespeed coachTests principles; review the machine-readability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Coach Signals"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-coach-07","testId":"ni-sitespeed-coach-07","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Agent Discovery","description":"Validates agent discovery hints and AI-readable policy/documentation signals for coaching hints for performance and quality improvements from measured evidence. Evidence should include llms, policy, MCP, OpenAPI, or schema evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Agent Discovery appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the agent discovery evidence for sitespeed coach signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-coach-07","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","coach","performance","recommendations","agent-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/scoring/new-internet',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({analysisId:'example'})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-coach check:7","humanCommand":"Review optimization guidance quality against sitespeed coachTests principles; review the agent-discovery evidence dimension for Sitespeed Coach Signals"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-coach-08","testId":"ni-sitespeed-coach-08","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Crawler Discovery","description":"Validates crawler discovery paths through robots, sitemap, feeds, and canonical links for coaching hints for performance and quality improvements from measured evidence. Evidence should include discovery artifact and link evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Crawler Discovery appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the crawler discovery evidence for sitespeed coach signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-coach-08","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","coach","performance","recommendations","crawler-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/scoring/new-internet',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({analysisId:'example'})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-coach check:8","humanCommand":"Review optimization guidance quality against sitespeed coachTests principles; review the crawler-discovery evidence dimension for Sitespeed Coach Signals"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-coach-09","testId":"ni-sitespeed-coach-09","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Answerability","description":"Validates direct answer extraction and quotable explanatory content for coaching hints for performance and quality improvements from measured evidence. Evidence should include question, summary, heading, and paragraph evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Answerability appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the answerability evidence for sitespeed coach signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-coach-09","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","coach","performance","recommendations","answerability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/scoring/new-internet',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({analysisId:'example'})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-coach check:9","humanCommand":"Review optimization guidance quality against sitespeed coachTests principles; review the answerability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Coach Signals"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-coach-10","testId":"ni-sitespeed-coach-10","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Generative Context","description":"Validates GEO context quality for generative engines without inventing measured facts for coaching hints for performance and quality improvements from measured evidence. Evidence should include entity, source, and instruction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Generative Context appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the generative context evidence for sitespeed coach signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-coach-10","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","coach","performance","recommendations","generative-context","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/scoring/new-internet',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({analysisId:'example'})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-coach check:10","humanCommand":"Review optimization guidance quality against sitespeed coachTests principles; review the generative-context evidence dimension for Sitespeed Coach Signals"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-coach-11","testId":"ni-sitespeed-coach-11","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Search Intent","description":"Validates search intent alignment and snippet-friendly content structure for coaching hints for performance and quality improvements from measured evidence. Evidence should include metadata, headings, and topical text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Search Intent appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the search intent evidence for sitespeed coach signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-coach-11","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","coach","performance","recommendations","search-intent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/scoring/new-internet',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({analysisId:'example'})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-coach check:11","humanCommand":"Review optimization guidance quality against sitespeed coachTests principles; review the search-intent evidence dimension for Sitespeed Coach Signals"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-coach-12","testId":"ni-sitespeed-coach-12","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Accessibility Semantics","description":"Validates accessible names, relationships, landmarks, and keyboard-relevant structure for coaching hints for performance and quality improvements from measured evidence. Evidence should include ARIA, labels, landmarks, and control evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Accessibility Semantics appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the accessibility semantics evidence for sitespeed coach signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-coach-12","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","coach","performance","recommendations","accessibility-semantics","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/scoring/new-internet',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({analysisId:'example'})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-coach check:12","humanCommand":"Review optimization guidance quality against sitespeed coachTests principles; review the accessibility-semantics evidence dimension for Sitespeed Coach Signals"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-coach-13","testId":"ni-sitespeed-coach-13","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Mobile Readiness","description":"Validates mobile viewport, responsive content, and touch-friendly layout signals for coaching hints for performance and quality improvements from measured evidence. Evidence should include viewport and responsive asset evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Mobile Readiness appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the mobile readiness evidence for sitespeed coach signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-coach-13","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","coach","performance","recommendations","mobile-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/scoring/new-internet',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({analysisId:'example'})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-coach check:13","humanCommand":"Review optimization guidance quality against sitespeed coachTests principles; review the mobile-readiness evidence dimension for Sitespeed Coach Signals"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-coach-14","testId":"ni-sitespeed-coach-14","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Performance Budget","description":"Validates performance budget compliance using measured or bounded deterministic inputs for coaching hints for performance and quality improvements from measured evidence. Evidence should include timing, byte, and Lighthouse-derived evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Performance Budget appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the performance budget evidence for sitespeed coach signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-coach-14","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","coach","performance","recommendations","performance-budget","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/scoring/new-internet',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({analysisId:'example'})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-coach check:14","humanCommand":"Review optimization guidance quality against sitespeed coachTests principles; review the performance-budget evidence dimension for Sitespeed Coach Signals"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-coach-15","testId":"ni-sitespeed-coach-15","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Resource Efficiency","description":"Validates resource size, script/style count, and optimization opportunity signals for coaching hints for performance and quality improvements from measured evidence. Evidence should include resource and markup evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Resource Efficiency appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the resource efficiency evidence for sitespeed coach signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-coach-15","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","coach","performance","recommendations","resource-efficiency","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/scoring/new-internet',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({analysisId:'example'})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-coach check:15","humanCommand":"Review optimization guidance quality against sitespeed coachTests principles; review the resource-efficiency evidence dimension for Sitespeed Coach Signals"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-coach-16","testId":"ni-sitespeed-coach-16","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Cache Freshness","description":"Validates cache behavior, freshness hints, and stale-content risk for coaching hints for performance and quality improvements from measured evidence. Evidence should include HTTP cache and timestamp evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Cache Freshness appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the cache freshness evidence for sitespeed coach signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-coach-16","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","coach","performance","recommendations","cache-freshness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/scoring/new-internet',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({analysisId:'example'})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-coach check:16","humanCommand":"Review optimization guidance quality against sitespeed coachTests principles; review the cache-freshness evidence dimension for Sitespeed Coach Signals"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-coach-17","testId":"ni-sitespeed-coach-17","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Route Reliability","description":"Validates route reliability, redirect safety, and dead-link risk for coaching hints for performance and quality improvements from measured evidence. Evidence should include status, redirect, and sitemap evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Route Reliability appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the route reliability evidence for sitespeed coach signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-coach-17","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","coach","performance","recommendations","route-reliability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/scoring/new-internet',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({analysisId:'example'})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-coach check:17","humanCommand":"Review optimization guidance quality against sitespeed coachTests principles; review the route-reliability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Coach Signals"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-coach-18","testId":"ni-sitespeed-coach-18","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Feed Quality","description":"Validates RSS/Atom/feed usefulness, parseability, and freshness for coaching hints for performance and quality improvements from measured evidence. Evidence should include feed XML and item evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Feed Quality appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the feed quality evidence for sitespeed coach signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-coach-18","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","coach","performance","recommendations","feed-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/scoring/new-internet',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({analysisId:'example'})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-coach check:18","humanCommand":"Review optimization guidance quality against sitespeed coachTests principles; review the feed-quality evidence dimension for Sitespeed Coach Signals"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-coach-19","testId":"ni-sitespeed-coach-19","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Sitemap Quality","description":"Validates sitemap validity, public-safe URL coverage, and no-dead-link policy for coaching hints for performance and quality improvements from measured evidence. Evidence should include sitemap XML and bounded link-check evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Sitemap Quality appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the sitemap quality evidence for sitespeed coach signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-coach-19","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","coach","performance","recommendations","sitemap-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/scoring/new-internet',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({analysisId:'example'})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-coach check:19","humanCommand":"Review optimization guidance quality against sitespeed coachTests principles; review the sitemap-quality evidence dimension for Sitespeed Coach Signals"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-coach-20","testId":"ni-sitespeed-coach-20","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Robots Alignment","description":"Validates robots.txt alignment with public/protected policy and sitemap discovery for coaching hints for performance and quality improvements from measured evidence. Evidence should include robots directives and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Robots Alignment appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the robots alignment evidence for sitespeed coach signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-coach-20","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","coach","performance","recommendations","robots-alignment","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/scoring/new-internet',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({analysisId:'example'})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-coach check:20","humanCommand":"Review optimization guidance quality against sitespeed coachTests principles; review the robots-alignment evidence dimension for Sitespeed Coach Signals"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-coach-21","testId":"ni-sitespeed-coach-21","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Llms Structure","description":"Validates llms.txt structure, readability, endpoint coverage, and agent usefulness for coaching hints for performance and quality improvements from measured evidence. Evidence should include plain-text section and line-length evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Llms Structure appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms structure evidence for sitespeed coach signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-coach-21","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","coach","performance","recommendations","llms-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/scoring/new-internet',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({analysisId:'example'})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-coach check:21","humanCommand":"Review optimization guidance quality against sitespeed coachTests principles; review the llms-structure evidence dimension for Sitespeed Coach Signals"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-coach-22","testId":"ni-sitespeed-coach-22","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Llms Index Schema","description":"Validates llms-index JSON schema shape and count reconciliation for coaching hints for performance and quality improvements from measured evidence. Evidence should include JSON keys, counts, and endpoint evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Llms Index Schema appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms index schema evidence for sitespeed coach signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-coach-22","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","coach","performance","recommendations","llms-index-schema","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/scoring/new-internet',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({analysisId:'example'})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-coach check:22","humanCommand":"Review optimization guidance quality against sitespeed coachTests principles; review the llms-index-schema evidence dimension for Sitespeed Coach Signals"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-coach-23","testId":"ni-sitespeed-coach-23","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Humans Attribution","description":"Validates humans.txt attribution, maintainer, technology, and governance transparency for coaching hints for performance and quality improvements from measured evidence. Evidence should include humans.txt section evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Humans Attribution appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the humans attribution evidence for sitespeed coach signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-coach-23","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","coach","performance","recommendations","humans-attribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/scoring/new-internet',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({analysisId:'example'})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-coach check:23","humanCommand":"Review optimization guidance quality against sitespeed coachTests principles; review the humans-attribution evidence dimension for Sitespeed Coach Signals"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-coach-24","testId":"ni-sitespeed-coach-24","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Agent Policy","description":"Validates agent-policy JSON clarity for allowed, disallowed, and protected operations for coaching hints for performance and quality improvements from measured evidence. Evidence should include well-known policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Agent Policy appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the agent policy evidence for sitespeed coach signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-coach-24","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","coach","performance","recommendations","agent-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/scoring/new-internet',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({analysisId:'example'})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-coach check:24","humanCommand":"Review optimization guidance quality against sitespeed coachTests principles; review the agent-policy evidence dimension for Sitespeed Coach Signals"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-coach-25","testId":"ni-sitespeed-coach-25","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Ai Policy","description":"Validates AI policy clarity for training, search, answer use, caching, and attribution for coaching hints for performance and quality improvements from measured evidence. Evidence should include well-known AI policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Ai Policy appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ai policy evidence for sitespeed coach signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-coach-25","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","coach","performance","recommendations","ai-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/scoring/new-internet',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({analysisId:'example'})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-coach check:25","humanCommand":"Review optimization guidance quality against sitespeed coachTests principles; review the ai-policy evidence dimension for Sitespeed Coach Signals"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-coach-26","testId":"ni-sitespeed-coach-26","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Trust Policy","description":"Validates trust policy coverage for privacy, traceability, metadata, and protected actions for coaching hints for performance and quality improvements from measured evidence. Evidence should include trust.json evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Trust Policy appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the trust policy evidence for sitespeed coach signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-coach-26","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","coach","performance","recommendations","trust-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/scoring/new-internet',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({analysisId:'example'})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-coach check:26","humanCommand":"Review optimization guidance quality against sitespeed coachTests principles; review the trust-policy evidence dimension for Sitespeed Coach Signals"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-coach-27","testId":"ni-sitespeed-coach-27","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Openapi Contract","description":"Validates OpenAPI availability, server URL accuracy, schemas, and auth policy for coaching hints for performance and quality improvements from measured evidence. Evidence should include OpenAPI text/JSON evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Openapi Contract appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the openapi contract evidence for sitespeed coach signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-coach-27","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","coach","performance","recommendations","openapi-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/scoring/new-internet',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({analysisId:'example'})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-coach check:27","humanCommand":"Review optimization guidance quality against sitespeed coachTests principles; review the openapi-contract evidence dimension for Sitespeed Coach Signals"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-coach-28","testId":"ni-sitespeed-coach-28","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Mcp Contract","description":"Validates MCP JSON-RPC introspection, real tools, resources, and protected boundaries for coaching hints for performance and quality improvements from measured evidence. Evidence should include MCP manifest and initialize evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Mcp Contract appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the mcp contract evidence for sitespeed coach signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-coach-28","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","coach","performance","recommendations","mcp-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/scoring/new-internet',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({analysisId:'example'})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-coach check:28","humanCommand":"Review optimization guidance quality against sitespeed coachTests principles; review the mcp-contract evidence dimension for Sitespeed Coach Signals"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-coach-29","testId":"ni-sitespeed-coach-29","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Api Error Shape","description":"Validates API success/error response shape consistency for coaching hints for performance and quality improvements from measured evidence. Evidence should include REST envelope evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Api Error Shape appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the api error shape evidence for sitespeed coach signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-coach-29","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","coach","performance","recommendations","api-error-shape","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/scoring/new-internet',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({analysisId:'example'})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-coach check:29","humanCommand":"Review optimization guidance quality against sitespeed coachTests principles; review the api-error-shape evidence dimension for Sitespeed Coach Signals"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-coach-30","testId":"ni-sitespeed-coach-30","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Traceability","description":"Validates trace propagation, request IDs, and safe observability correlation for coaching hints for performance and quality improvements from measured evidence. Evidence should include trace header and metadata evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Traceability appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the traceability evidence for sitespeed coach signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-coach-30","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","coach","performance","recommendations","traceability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/scoring/new-internet',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({analysisId:'example'})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-coach check:30","humanCommand":"Review optimization guidance quality against sitespeed coachTests principles; review the traceability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Coach Signals"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-coach-31","testId":"ni-sitespeed-coach-31","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Ja4 Redaction","description":"Validates fingerprint-adjacent metadata redaction and non-public raw JA4 handling for coaching hints for performance and quality improvements from measured evidence. Evidence should include metadata policy and redaction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Ja4 Redaction appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the ja4 redaction evidence for sitespeed coach signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-coach-31","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","coach","performance","recommendations","ja4-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/scoring/new-internet',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({analysisId:'example'})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-coach check:31","humanCommand":"Review optimization guidance quality against sitespeed coachTests principles; review the ja4-redaction evidence dimension for Sitespeed Coach Signals"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-coach-32","testId":"ni-sitespeed-coach-32","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Secret Redaction","description":"Validates absence of secrets, generic key examples, cookies, and raw tokens in public outputs for coaching hints for performance and quality improvements from measured evidence. Evidence should include public artifact scan evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Secret Redaction appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the secret redaction evidence for sitespeed coach signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-coach-32","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","coach","performance","recommendations","secret-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/scoring/new-internet',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({analysisId:'example'})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-coach check:32","humanCommand":"Review optimization guidance quality against sitespeed coachTests principles; review the secret-redaction evidence dimension for Sitespeed Coach Signals"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-coach-33","testId":"ni-sitespeed-coach-33","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Security Headers","description":"Validates security header coverage and hardened transport signals for coaching hints for performance and quality improvements from measured evidence. Evidence should include HTTP header evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Security Headers appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the security headers evidence for sitespeed coach signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-coach-33","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","coach","performance","recommendations","security-headers","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/scoring/new-internet',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({analysisId:'example'})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-coach check:33","humanCommand":"Review optimization guidance quality against sitespeed coachTests principles; review the security-headers evidence dimension for Sitespeed Coach Signals"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-coach-34","testId":"ni-sitespeed-coach-34","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Privacy Consent","description":"Validates privacy policy, consent, attribution, and data-use disclosure quality for coaching hints for performance and quality improvements from measured evidence. Evidence should include public page and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Privacy Consent appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the privacy consent evidence for sitespeed coach signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-coach-34","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","coach","performance","recommendations","privacy-consent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/scoring/new-internet',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({analysisId:'example'})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-coach check:34","humanCommand":"Review optimization guidance quality against sitespeed coachTests principles; review the privacy-consent evidence dimension for Sitespeed Coach Signals"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-coach-35","testId":"ni-sitespeed-coach-35","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Structured Data","description":"Validates JSON-LD and entity modeling for machine interpretation for coaching hints for performance and quality improvements from measured evidence. Evidence should include schema block and parse evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Structured Data appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the structured data evidence for sitespeed coach signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-coach-35","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","coach","performance","recommendations","structured-data","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/scoring/new-internet',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({analysisId:'example'})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-coach check:35","humanCommand":"Review optimization guidance quality against sitespeed coachTests principles; review the structured-data evidence dimension for Sitespeed Coach Signals"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-coach-36","testId":"ni-sitespeed-coach-36","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Social Preview","description":"Validates Open Graph and Twitter/X card readiness for public sharing for coaching hints for performance and quality improvements from measured evidence. Evidence should include meta tag evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Social Preview appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the social preview evidence for sitespeed coach signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-coach-36","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","coach","performance","recommendations","social-preview","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/scoring/new-internet',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({analysisId:'example'})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-coach check:36","humanCommand":"Review optimization guidance quality against sitespeed coachTests principles; review the social-preview evidence dimension for Sitespeed Coach Signals"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-coach-37","testId":"ni-sitespeed-coach-37","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: I18n Routing","description":"Validates locale route, hreflang, language declaration, and translation readiness for coaching hints for performance and quality improvements from measured evidence. Evidence should include lang/hreflang and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: I18n Routing appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the i18n routing evidence for sitespeed coach signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-coach-37","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","coach","performance","recommendations","i18n-routing","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/scoring/new-internet',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({analysisId:'example'})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-coach check:37","humanCommand":"Review optimization guidance quality against sitespeed coachTests principles; review the i18n-routing evidence dimension for Sitespeed Coach Signals"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-coach-38","testId":"ni-sitespeed-coach-38","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Readability","description":"Validates human readability, sectioning, sentence complexity, and comprehension support for coaching hints for performance and quality improvements from measured evidence. Evidence should include extracted content evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Readability appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the readability evidence for sitespeed coach signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-coach-38","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","coach","performance","recommendations","readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/scoring/new-internet',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({analysisId:'example'})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-coach check:38","humanCommand":"Review optimization guidance quality against sitespeed coachTests principles; review the readability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Coach Signals"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-coach-39","testId":"ni-sitespeed-coach-39","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Content Utility","description":"Validates non-placeholder content usefulness and domain-specific public value for coaching hints for performance and quality improvements from measured evidence. Evidence should include content extraction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Content Utility appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the content utility evidence for sitespeed coach signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-coach-39","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","coach","performance","recommendations","content-utility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/scoring/new-internet',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({analysisId:'example'})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-coach check:39","humanCommand":"Review optimization guidance quality against sitespeed coachTests principles; review the content-utility evidence dimension for Sitespeed Coach Signals"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-coach-40","testId":"ni-sitespeed-coach-40","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Recommendation Grounding","description":"Validates recommendation grounding in deterministic evidence instead of fabricated model output for coaching hints for performance and quality improvements from measured evidence. Evidence should include issue and remediation evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Recommendation Grounding appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the recommendation grounding evidence for sitespeed coach signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-coach-40","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","coach","performance","recommendations","recommendation-grounding","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/scoring/new-internet',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({analysisId:'example'})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-coach check:40","humanCommand":"Review optimization guidance quality against sitespeed coachTests principles; review the recommendation-grounding evidence dimension for Sitespeed Coach Signals"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-coach-41","testId":"ni-sitespeed-coach-41","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Evidence Quality","description":"Validates evidence completeness, public safety, and reproducibility for coaching hints for performance and quality improvements from measured evidence. Evidence should include test output and artifact evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Evidence Quality appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the evidence quality evidence for sitespeed coach signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-coach-41","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","coach","performance","recommendations","evidence-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/scoring/new-internet',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({analysisId:'example'})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-coach check:41","humanCommand":"Review optimization guidance quality against sitespeed coachTests principles; review the evidence-quality evidence dimension for Sitespeed Coach Signals"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-coach-42","testId":"ni-sitespeed-coach-42","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Threshold Policy","description":"Validates threshold clarity, pass/warn/fail semantics, and scoring transparency for coaching hints for performance and quality improvements from measured evidence. Evidence should include threshold and result status evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Threshold Policy appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the threshold policy evidence for sitespeed coach signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-coach-42","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","coach","performance","recommendations","threshold-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/scoring/new-internet',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({analysisId:'example'})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-coach check:42","humanCommand":"Review optimization guidance quality against sitespeed coachTests principles; review the threshold-policy evidence dimension for Sitespeed Coach Signals"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-coach-43","testId":"ni-sitespeed-coach-43","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Confidence","description":"Validates confidence scoring and degraded-input disclosure for coaching hints for performance and quality improvements from measured evidence. Evidence should include source freshness and input availability evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Confidence appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the confidence evidence for sitespeed coach signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-coach-43","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","coach","performance","recommendations","confidence","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/scoring/new-internet',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({analysisId:'example'})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-coach check:43","humanCommand":"Review optimization guidance quality against sitespeed coachTests principles; review the confidence evidence dimension for Sitespeed Coach Signals"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-coach-44","testId":"ni-sitespeed-coach-44","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Trend Readiness","description":"Validates historical comparability and timeline readiness for future reruns for coaching hints for performance and quality improvements from measured evidence. Evidence should include analysis ID, timestamp, and persistence evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Trend Readiness appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the trend readiness evidence for sitespeed coach signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-coach-44","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","coach","performance","recommendations","trend-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/scoring/new-internet',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({analysisId:'example'})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-coach check:44","humanCommand":"Review optimization guidance quality against sitespeed coachTests principles; review the trend-readiness evidence dimension for Sitespeed Coach Signals"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-coach-45","testId":"ni-sitespeed-coach-45","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Ranking Readiness","description":"Validates ranking input completeness and profile compatibility for coaching hints for performance and quality improvements from measured evidence. Evidence should include score and profile evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Ranking Readiness appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ranking readiness evidence for sitespeed coach signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-coach-45","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","coach","performance","recommendations","ranking-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/scoring/new-internet',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({analysisId:'example'})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-coach check:45","humanCommand":"Review optimization guidance quality against sitespeed coachTests principles; review the ranking-readiness evidence dimension for Sitespeed Coach Signals"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-coach-46","testId":"ni-sitespeed-coach-46","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Network Contribution","description":"Validates PlatPhorm network contribution through discovery, integrations, and standards compliance for coaching hints for performance and quality improvements from measured evidence. Evidence should include network graph and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Network Contribution appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the network contribution evidence for sitespeed coach signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-coach-46","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","coach","performance","recommendations","network-contribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/scoring/new-internet',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({analysisId:'example'})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-coach check:46","humanCommand":"Review optimization guidance quality against sitespeed coachTests principles; review the network-contribution evidence dimension for Sitespeed Coach Signals"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-coach-47","testId":"ni-sitespeed-coach-47","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Report Readiness","description":"Validates report/export categorization with public-safe evidence and protected boundaries for coaching hints for performance and quality improvements from measured evidence. Evidence should include report section mapping evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Report Readiness appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the report readiness evidence for sitespeed coach signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-coach-47","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","coach","performance","recommendations","report-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/scoring/new-internet',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({analysisId:'example'})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-coach check:47","humanCommand":"Review optimization guidance quality against sitespeed coachTests principles; review the report-readiness evidence dimension for Sitespeed Coach Signals"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-coach-48","testId":"ni-sitespeed-coach-48","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Operator Actionability","description":"Validates clear remediation, owner action, difficulty, and retest path for coaching hints for performance and quality improvements from measured evidence. Evidence should include fix instructions and command evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Operator Actionability appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the operator actionability evidence for sitespeed coach signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-coach-48","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","coach","performance","recommendations","operator-actionability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/scoring/new-internet',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({analysisId:'example'})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-coach check:48","humanCommand":"Review optimization guidance quality against sitespeed coachTests principles; review the operator-actionability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Coach Signals"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-coach-49","testId":"ni-sitespeed-coach-49","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Degraded State","description":"Validates honest degraded, unavailable, skipped, and not-applicable states for coaching hints for performance and quality improvements from measured evidence. Evidence should include status and storage evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Degraded State appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the degraded state evidence for sitespeed coach signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-coach-49","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","coach","performance","recommendations","degraded-state","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/scoring/new-internet',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({analysisId:'example'})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-coach check:49","humanCommand":"Review optimization guidance quality against sitespeed coachTests principles; review the degraded-state evidence dimension for Sitespeed Coach Signals"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-coach-50","testId":"ni-sitespeed-coach-50","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Reproducibility","description":"Validates stable CLI/API/human reproduction path and deterministic rerun instructions for coaching hints for performance and quality improvements from measured evidence. Evidence should include commands and registry version evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Coach Signals: Reproducibility appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the reproducibility evidence for sitespeed coach signals, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-coach-50","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","coach","performance","recommendations","reproducibility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/scoring/new-internet',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({analysisId:'example'})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-coach check:50","humanCommand":"Review optimization guidance quality against sitespeed coachTests principles; review the reproducibility evidence dimension for Sitespeed Coach Signals"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-domain-01","testId":"ni-sitespeed-domain-01","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Availability","description":"Validates public route availability and successful bounded fetch behavior for domain-level aggregation, route grouping, and canonical origin consistency. Evidence should include HTTP status, timeout, and redirect evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Availability appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the availability evidence for sitespeed domain scope, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-domain-01","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","domain","ranking","integrity","availability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/rankings/domains').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-domain check:1","humanCommand":"Validate domain-scoped comparisons using sitespeed domainTests style checks; review the availability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Domain Scope"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-domain-02","testId":"ni-sitespeed-domain-02","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Public Safety","description":"Validates public-safe access boundaries without exposing private or protected data for domain-level aggregation, route grouping, and canonical origin consistency. Evidence should include route policy and response-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Public Safety appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the public safety evidence for sitespeed domain scope, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-domain-02","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","domain","ranking","integrity","public-safety","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/rankings/domains').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-domain check:2","humanCommand":"Validate domain-scoped comparisons using sitespeed domainTests style checks; review the public-safety evidence dimension for Sitespeed Domain Scope"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-domain-03","testId":"ni-sitespeed-domain-03","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Canonical Url","description":"Validates canonical URL stability and normalized route identity for domain-level aggregation, route grouping, and canonical origin consistency. Evidence should include canonical tags, redirects, and normalized URL evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Canonical Url appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the canonical url evidence for sitespeed domain scope, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-domain-03","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","domain","ranking","integrity","canonical-url","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/rankings/domains').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-domain check:3","humanCommand":"Validate domain-scoped comparisons using sitespeed domainTests style checks; review the canonical-url evidence dimension for Sitespeed Domain Scope"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-domain-04","testId":"ni-sitespeed-domain-04","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Metadata Clarity","description":"Validates title, description, and page-specific metadata clarity for domain-level aggregation, route grouping, and canonical origin consistency. Evidence should include HTML metadata and extracted text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Metadata Clarity appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the metadata clarity evidence for sitespeed domain scope, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-domain-04","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","domain","ranking","integrity","metadata-clarity","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/rankings/domains').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-domain check:4","humanCommand":"Validate domain-scoped comparisons using sitespeed domainTests style checks; review the metadata-clarity evidence dimension for Sitespeed Domain Scope"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-domain-05","testId":"ni-sitespeed-domain-05","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Semantic Structure","description":"Validates semantic HTML structure for humans, agents, and assistive technology for domain-level aggregation, route grouping, and canonical origin consistency. Evidence should include heading, landmark, and element evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Semantic Structure appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the semantic structure evidence for sitespeed domain scope, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-domain-05","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","domain","ranking","integrity","semantic-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/rankings/domains').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-domain check:5","humanCommand":"Validate domain-scoped comparisons using sitespeed domainTests style checks; review the semantic-structure evidence dimension for Sitespeed Domain Scope"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-domain-06","testId":"ni-sitespeed-domain-06","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Machine Readability","description":"Validates machine-readable public content and predictable parsing surfaces for domain-level aggregation, route grouping, and canonical origin consistency. Evidence should include structured tags, JSON-LD, and document-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Machine Readability appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the machine readability evidence for sitespeed domain scope, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-domain-06","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","domain","ranking","integrity","machine-readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/rankings/domains').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-domain check:6","humanCommand":"Validate domain-scoped comparisons using sitespeed domainTests style checks; review the machine-readability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Domain Scope"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-domain-07","testId":"ni-sitespeed-domain-07","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Agent Discovery","description":"Validates agent discovery hints and AI-readable policy/documentation signals for domain-level aggregation, route grouping, and canonical origin consistency. Evidence should include llms, policy, MCP, OpenAPI, or schema evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Agent Discovery appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the agent discovery evidence for sitespeed domain scope, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-domain-07","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","domain","ranking","integrity","agent-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/rankings/domains').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-domain check:7","humanCommand":"Validate domain-scoped comparisons using sitespeed domainTests style checks; review the agent-discovery evidence dimension for Sitespeed Domain Scope"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-domain-08","testId":"ni-sitespeed-domain-08","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Crawler Discovery","description":"Validates crawler discovery paths through robots, sitemap, feeds, and canonical links for domain-level aggregation, route grouping, and canonical origin consistency. Evidence should include discovery artifact and link evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Crawler Discovery appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the crawler discovery evidence for sitespeed domain scope, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-domain-08","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","domain","ranking","integrity","crawler-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/rankings/domains').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-domain check:8","humanCommand":"Validate domain-scoped comparisons using sitespeed domainTests style checks; review the crawler-discovery evidence dimension for Sitespeed Domain Scope"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-domain-09","testId":"ni-sitespeed-domain-09","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Answerability","description":"Validates direct answer extraction and quotable explanatory content for domain-level aggregation, route grouping, and canonical origin consistency. Evidence should include question, summary, heading, and paragraph evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Answerability appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the answerability evidence for sitespeed domain scope, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-domain-09","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","domain","ranking","integrity","answerability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/rankings/domains').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-domain check:9","humanCommand":"Validate domain-scoped comparisons using sitespeed domainTests style checks; review the answerability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Domain Scope"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-domain-10","testId":"ni-sitespeed-domain-10","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Generative Context","description":"Validates GEO context quality for generative engines without inventing measured facts for domain-level aggregation, route grouping, and canonical origin consistency. Evidence should include entity, source, and instruction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Generative Context appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the generative context evidence for sitespeed domain scope, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-domain-10","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","domain","ranking","integrity","generative-context","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/rankings/domains').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-domain check:10","humanCommand":"Validate domain-scoped comparisons using sitespeed domainTests style checks; review the generative-context evidence dimension for Sitespeed Domain Scope"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-domain-11","testId":"ni-sitespeed-domain-11","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Search Intent","description":"Validates search intent alignment and snippet-friendly content structure for domain-level aggregation, route grouping, and canonical origin consistency. Evidence should include metadata, headings, and topical text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Search Intent appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the search intent evidence for sitespeed domain scope, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-domain-11","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","domain","ranking","integrity","search-intent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/rankings/domains').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-domain check:11","humanCommand":"Validate domain-scoped comparisons using sitespeed domainTests style checks; review the search-intent evidence dimension for Sitespeed Domain Scope"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-domain-12","testId":"ni-sitespeed-domain-12","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Accessibility Semantics","description":"Validates accessible names, relationships, landmarks, and keyboard-relevant structure for domain-level aggregation, route grouping, and canonical origin consistency. Evidence should include ARIA, labels, landmarks, and control evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Accessibility Semantics appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the accessibility semantics evidence for sitespeed domain scope, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-domain-12","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","domain","ranking","integrity","accessibility-semantics","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/rankings/domains').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-domain check:12","humanCommand":"Validate domain-scoped comparisons using sitespeed domainTests style checks; review the accessibility-semantics evidence dimension for Sitespeed Domain Scope"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-domain-13","testId":"ni-sitespeed-domain-13","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Mobile Readiness","description":"Validates mobile viewport, responsive content, and touch-friendly layout signals for domain-level aggregation, route grouping, and canonical origin consistency. Evidence should include viewport and responsive asset evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Mobile Readiness appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the mobile readiness evidence for sitespeed domain scope, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-domain-13","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","domain","ranking","integrity","mobile-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/rankings/domains').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-domain check:13","humanCommand":"Validate domain-scoped comparisons using sitespeed domainTests style checks; review the mobile-readiness evidence dimension for Sitespeed Domain Scope"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-domain-14","testId":"ni-sitespeed-domain-14","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Performance Budget","description":"Validates performance budget compliance using measured or bounded deterministic inputs for domain-level aggregation, route grouping, and canonical origin consistency. Evidence should include timing, byte, and Lighthouse-derived evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Performance Budget appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the performance budget evidence for sitespeed domain scope, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-domain-14","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","domain","ranking","integrity","performance-budget","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/rankings/domains').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-domain check:14","humanCommand":"Validate domain-scoped comparisons using sitespeed domainTests style checks; review the performance-budget evidence dimension for Sitespeed Domain Scope"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-domain-15","testId":"ni-sitespeed-domain-15","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Resource Efficiency","description":"Validates resource size, script/style count, and optimization opportunity signals for domain-level aggregation, route grouping, and canonical origin consistency. Evidence should include resource and markup evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Resource Efficiency appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the resource efficiency evidence for sitespeed domain scope, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-domain-15","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","domain","ranking","integrity","resource-efficiency","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/rankings/domains').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-domain check:15","humanCommand":"Validate domain-scoped comparisons using sitespeed domainTests style checks; review the resource-efficiency evidence dimension for Sitespeed Domain Scope"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-domain-16","testId":"ni-sitespeed-domain-16","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Cache Freshness","description":"Validates cache behavior, freshness hints, and stale-content risk for domain-level aggregation, route grouping, and canonical origin consistency. Evidence should include HTTP cache and timestamp evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Cache Freshness appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the cache freshness evidence for sitespeed domain scope, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-domain-16","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","domain","ranking","integrity","cache-freshness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/rankings/domains').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-domain check:16","humanCommand":"Validate domain-scoped comparisons using sitespeed domainTests style checks; review the cache-freshness evidence dimension for Sitespeed Domain Scope"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-domain-17","testId":"ni-sitespeed-domain-17","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Route Reliability","description":"Validates route reliability, redirect safety, and dead-link risk for domain-level aggregation, route grouping, and canonical origin consistency. Evidence should include status, redirect, and sitemap evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Route Reliability appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the route reliability evidence for sitespeed domain scope, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-domain-17","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","domain","ranking","integrity","route-reliability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/rankings/domains').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-domain check:17","humanCommand":"Validate domain-scoped comparisons using sitespeed domainTests style checks; review the route-reliability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Domain Scope"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-domain-18","testId":"ni-sitespeed-domain-18","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Feed Quality","description":"Validates RSS/Atom/feed usefulness, parseability, and freshness for domain-level aggregation, route grouping, and canonical origin consistency. Evidence should include feed XML and item evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Feed Quality appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the feed quality evidence for sitespeed domain scope, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-domain-18","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","domain","ranking","integrity","feed-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/rankings/domains').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-domain check:18","humanCommand":"Validate domain-scoped comparisons using sitespeed domainTests style checks; review the feed-quality evidence dimension for Sitespeed Domain Scope"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-domain-19","testId":"ni-sitespeed-domain-19","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Sitemap Quality","description":"Validates sitemap validity, public-safe URL coverage, and no-dead-link policy for domain-level aggregation, route grouping, and canonical origin consistency. Evidence should include sitemap XML and bounded link-check evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Sitemap Quality appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the sitemap quality evidence for sitespeed domain scope, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-domain-19","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","domain","ranking","integrity","sitemap-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/rankings/domains').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-domain check:19","humanCommand":"Validate domain-scoped comparisons using sitespeed domainTests style checks; review the sitemap-quality evidence dimension for Sitespeed Domain Scope"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-domain-20","testId":"ni-sitespeed-domain-20","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Robots Alignment","description":"Validates robots.txt alignment with public/protected policy and sitemap discovery for domain-level aggregation, route grouping, and canonical origin consistency. Evidence should include robots directives and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Robots Alignment appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the robots alignment evidence for sitespeed domain scope, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-domain-20","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","domain","ranking","integrity","robots-alignment","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/rankings/domains').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-domain check:20","humanCommand":"Validate domain-scoped comparisons using sitespeed domainTests style checks; review the robots-alignment evidence dimension for Sitespeed Domain Scope"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-domain-21","testId":"ni-sitespeed-domain-21","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Llms Structure","description":"Validates llms.txt structure, readability, endpoint coverage, and agent usefulness for domain-level aggregation, route grouping, and canonical origin consistency. Evidence should include plain-text section and line-length evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Llms Structure appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms structure evidence for sitespeed domain scope, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-domain-21","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","domain","ranking","integrity","llms-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/rankings/domains').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-domain check:21","humanCommand":"Validate domain-scoped comparisons using sitespeed domainTests style checks; review the llms-structure evidence dimension for Sitespeed Domain Scope"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-domain-22","testId":"ni-sitespeed-domain-22","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Llms Index Schema","description":"Validates llms-index JSON schema shape and count reconciliation for domain-level aggregation, route grouping, and canonical origin consistency. Evidence should include JSON keys, counts, and endpoint evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Llms Index Schema appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms index schema evidence for sitespeed domain scope, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-domain-22","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","domain","ranking","integrity","llms-index-schema","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/rankings/domains').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-domain check:22","humanCommand":"Validate domain-scoped comparisons using sitespeed domainTests style checks; review the llms-index-schema evidence dimension for Sitespeed Domain Scope"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-domain-23","testId":"ni-sitespeed-domain-23","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Humans Attribution","description":"Validates humans.txt attribution, maintainer, technology, and governance transparency for domain-level aggregation, route grouping, and canonical origin consistency. Evidence should include humans.txt section evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Humans Attribution appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the humans attribution evidence for sitespeed domain scope, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-domain-23","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","domain","ranking","integrity","humans-attribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/rankings/domains').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-domain check:23","humanCommand":"Validate domain-scoped comparisons using sitespeed domainTests style checks; review the humans-attribution evidence dimension for Sitespeed Domain Scope"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-domain-24","testId":"ni-sitespeed-domain-24","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Agent Policy","description":"Validates agent-policy JSON clarity for allowed, disallowed, and protected operations for domain-level aggregation, route grouping, and canonical origin consistency. Evidence should include well-known policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Agent Policy appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the agent policy evidence for sitespeed domain scope, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-domain-24","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","domain","ranking","integrity","agent-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/rankings/domains').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-domain check:24","humanCommand":"Validate domain-scoped comparisons using sitespeed domainTests style checks; review the agent-policy evidence dimension for Sitespeed Domain Scope"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-domain-25","testId":"ni-sitespeed-domain-25","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Ai Policy","description":"Validates AI policy clarity for training, search, answer use, caching, and attribution for domain-level aggregation, route grouping, and canonical origin consistency. Evidence should include well-known AI policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Ai Policy appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ai policy evidence for sitespeed domain scope, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-domain-25","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","domain","ranking","integrity","ai-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/rankings/domains').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-domain check:25","humanCommand":"Validate domain-scoped comparisons using sitespeed domainTests style checks; review the ai-policy evidence dimension for Sitespeed Domain Scope"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-domain-26","testId":"ni-sitespeed-domain-26","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Trust Policy","description":"Validates trust policy coverage for privacy, traceability, metadata, and protected actions for domain-level aggregation, route grouping, and canonical origin consistency. Evidence should include trust.json evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Trust Policy appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the trust policy evidence for sitespeed domain scope, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-domain-26","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","domain","ranking","integrity","trust-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/rankings/domains').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-domain check:26","humanCommand":"Validate domain-scoped comparisons using sitespeed domainTests style checks; review the trust-policy evidence dimension for Sitespeed Domain Scope"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-domain-27","testId":"ni-sitespeed-domain-27","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Openapi Contract","description":"Validates OpenAPI availability, server URL accuracy, schemas, and auth policy for domain-level aggregation, route grouping, and canonical origin consistency. Evidence should include OpenAPI text/JSON evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Openapi Contract appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the openapi contract evidence for sitespeed domain scope, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-domain-27","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","domain","ranking","integrity","openapi-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/rankings/domains').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-domain check:27","humanCommand":"Validate domain-scoped comparisons using sitespeed domainTests style checks; review the openapi-contract evidence dimension for Sitespeed Domain Scope"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-domain-28","testId":"ni-sitespeed-domain-28","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Mcp Contract","description":"Validates MCP JSON-RPC introspection, real tools, resources, and protected boundaries for domain-level aggregation, route grouping, and canonical origin consistency. Evidence should include MCP manifest and initialize evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Mcp Contract appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the mcp contract evidence for sitespeed domain scope, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-domain-28","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","domain","ranking","integrity","mcp-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/rankings/domains').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-domain check:28","humanCommand":"Validate domain-scoped comparisons using sitespeed domainTests style checks; review the mcp-contract evidence dimension for Sitespeed Domain Scope"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-domain-29","testId":"ni-sitespeed-domain-29","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Api Error Shape","description":"Validates API success/error response shape consistency for domain-level aggregation, route grouping, and canonical origin consistency. Evidence should include REST envelope evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Api Error Shape appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the api error shape evidence for sitespeed domain scope, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-domain-29","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","domain","ranking","integrity","api-error-shape","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/rankings/domains').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-domain check:29","humanCommand":"Validate domain-scoped comparisons using sitespeed domainTests style checks; review the api-error-shape evidence dimension for Sitespeed Domain Scope"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-domain-30","testId":"ni-sitespeed-domain-30","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Traceability","description":"Validates trace propagation, request IDs, and safe observability correlation for domain-level aggregation, route grouping, and canonical origin consistency. Evidence should include trace header and metadata evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Traceability appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the traceability evidence for sitespeed domain scope, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-domain-30","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","domain","ranking","integrity","traceability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/rankings/domains').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-domain check:30","humanCommand":"Validate domain-scoped comparisons using sitespeed domainTests style checks; review the traceability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Domain Scope"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-domain-31","testId":"ni-sitespeed-domain-31","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Ja4 Redaction","description":"Validates fingerprint-adjacent metadata redaction and non-public raw JA4 handling for domain-level aggregation, route grouping, and canonical origin consistency. Evidence should include metadata policy and redaction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Ja4 Redaction appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the ja4 redaction evidence for sitespeed domain scope, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-domain-31","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","domain","ranking","integrity","ja4-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/rankings/domains').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-domain check:31","humanCommand":"Validate domain-scoped comparisons using sitespeed domainTests style checks; review the ja4-redaction evidence dimension for Sitespeed Domain Scope"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-domain-32","testId":"ni-sitespeed-domain-32","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Secret Redaction","description":"Validates absence of secrets, generic key examples, cookies, and raw tokens in public outputs for domain-level aggregation, route grouping, and canonical origin consistency. Evidence should include public artifact scan evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Secret Redaction appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the secret redaction evidence for sitespeed domain scope, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-domain-32","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","domain","ranking","integrity","secret-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/rankings/domains').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-domain check:32","humanCommand":"Validate domain-scoped comparisons using sitespeed domainTests style checks; review the secret-redaction evidence dimension for Sitespeed Domain Scope"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-domain-33","testId":"ni-sitespeed-domain-33","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Security Headers","description":"Validates security header coverage and hardened transport signals for domain-level aggregation, route grouping, and canonical origin consistency. Evidence should include HTTP header evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Security Headers appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the security headers evidence for sitespeed domain scope, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-domain-33","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","domain","ranking","integrity","security-headers","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/rankings/domains').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-domain check:33","humanCommand":"Validate domain-scoped comparisons using sitespeed domainTests style checks; review the security-headers evidence dimension for Sitespeed Domain Scope"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-domain-34","testId":"ni-sitespeed-domain-34","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Privacy Consent","description":"Validates privacy policy, consent, attribution, and data-use disclosure quality for domain-level aggregation, route grouping, and canonical origin consistency. Evidence should include public page and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Privacy Consent appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the privacy consent evidence for sitespeed domain scope, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-domain-34","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","domain","ranking","integrity","privacy-consent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/rankings/domains').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-domain check:34","humanCommand":"Validate domain-scoped comparisons using sitespeed domainTests style checks; review the privacy-consent evidence dimension for Sitespeed Domain Scope"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-domain-35","testId":"ni-sitespeed-domain-35","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Structured Data","description":"Validates JSON-LD and entity modeling for machine interpretation for domain-level aggregation, route grouping, and canonical origin consistency. Evidence should include schema block and parse evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Structured Data appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the structured data evidence for sitespeed domain scope, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-domain-35","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","domain","ranking","integrity","structured-data","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/rankings/domains').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-domain check:35","humanCommand":"Validate domain-scoped comparisons using sitespeed domainTests style checks; review the structured-data evidence dimension for Sitespeed Domain Scope"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-domain-36","testId":"ni-sitespeed-domain-36","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Social Preview","description":"Validates Open Graph and Twitter/X card readiness for public sharing for domain-level aggregation, route grouping, and canonical origin consistency. Evidence should include meta tag evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Social Preview appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the social preview evidence for sitespeed domain scope, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-domain-36","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","domain","ranking","integrity","social-preview","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/rankings/domains').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-domain check:36","humanCommand":"Validate domain-scoped comparisons using sitespeed domainTests style checks; review the social-preview evidence dimension for Sitespeed Domain Scope"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-domain-37","testId":"ni-sitespeed-domain-37","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: I18n Routing","description":"Validates locale route, hreflang, language declaration, and translation readiness for domain-level aggregation, route grouping, and canonical origin consistency. Evidence should include lang/hreflang and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: I18n Routing appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the i18n routing evidence for sitespeed domain scope, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-domain-37","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","domain","ranking","integrity","i18n-routing","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/rankings/domains').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-domain check:37","humanCommand":"Validate domain-scoped comparisons using sitespeed domainTests style checks; review the i18n-routing evidence dimension for Sitespeed Domain Scope"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-domain-38","testId":"ni-sitespeed-domain-38","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Readability","description":"Validates human readability, sectioning, sentence complexity, and comprehension support for domain-level aggregation, route grouping, and canonical origin consistency. Evidence should include extracted content evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Readability appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the readability evidence for sitespeed domain scope, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-domain-38","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","domain","ranking","integrity","readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/rankings/domains').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-domain check:38","humanCommand":"Validate domain-scoped comparisons using sitespeed domainTests style checks; review the readability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Domain Scope"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-domain-39","testId":"ni-sitespeed-domain-39","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Content Utility","description":"Validates non-placeholder content usefulness and domain-specific public value for domain-level aggregation, route grouping, and canonical origin consistency. Evidence should include content extraction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Content Utility appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the content utility evidence for sitespeed domain scope, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-domain-39","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","domain","ranking","integrity","content-utility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/rankings/domains').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-domain check:39","humanCommand":"Validate domain-scoped comparisons using sitespeed domainTests style checks; review the content-utility evidence dimension for Sitespeed Domain Scope"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-domain-40","testId":"ni-sitespeed-domain-40","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Recommendation Grounding","description":"Validates recommendation grounding in deterministic evidence instead of fabricated model output for domain-level aggregation, route grouping, and canonical origin consistency. Evidence should include issue and remediation evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Recommendation Grounding appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the recommendation grounding evidence for sitespeed domain scope, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-domain-40","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","domain","ranking","integrity","recommendation-grounding","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/rankings/domains').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-domain check:40","humanCommand":"Validate domain-scoped comparisons using sitespeed domainTests style checks; review the recommendation-grounding evidence dimension for Sitespeed Domain Scope"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-domain-41","testId":"ni-sitespeed-domain-41","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Evidence Quality","description":"Validates evidence completeness, public safety, and reproducibility for domain-level aggregation, route grouping, and canonical origin consistency. Evidence should include test output and artifact evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Evidence Quality appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the evidence quality evidence for sitespeed domain scope, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-domain-41","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","domain","ranking","integrity","evidence-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/rankings/domains').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-domain check:41","humanCommand":"Validate domain-scoped comparisons using sitespeed domainTests style checks; review the evidence-quality evidence dimension for Sitespeed Domain Scope"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-domain-42","testId":"ni-sitespeed-domain-42","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Threshold Policy","description":"Validates threshold clarity, pass/warn/fail semantics, and scoring transparency for domain-level aggregation, route grouping, and canonical origin consistency. Evidence should include threshold and result status evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Threshold Policy appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the threshold policy evidence for sitespeed domain scope, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-domain-42","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","domain","ranking","integrity","threshold-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/rankings/domains').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-domain check:42","humanCommand":"Validate domain-scoped comparisons using sitespeed domainTests style checks; review the threshold-policy evidence dimension for Sitespeed Domain Scope"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-domain-43","testId":"ni-sitespeed-domain-43","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Confidence","description":"Validates confidence scoring and degraded-input disclosure for domain-level aggregation, route grouping, and canonical origin consistency. Evidence should include source freshness and input availability evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Confidence appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the confidence evidence for sitespeed domain scope, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-domain-43","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","domain","ranking","integrity","confidence","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/rankings/domains').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-domain check:43","humanCommand":"Validate domain-scoped comparisons using sitespeed domainTests style checks; review the confidence evidence dimension for Sitespeed Domain Scope"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-domain-44","testId":"ni-sitespeed-domain-44","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Trend Readiness","description":"Validates historical comparability and timeline readiness for future reruns for domain-level aggregation, route grouping, and canonical origin consistency. Evidence should include analysis ID, timestamp, and persistence evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Trend Readiness appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the trend readiness evidence for sitespeed domain scope, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-domain-44","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","domain","ranking","integrity","trend-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/rankings/domains').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-domain check:44","humanCommand":"Validate domain-scoped comparisons using sitespeed domainTests style checks; review the trend-readiness evidence dimension for Sitespeed Domain Scope"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-domain-45","testId":"ni-sitespeed-domain-45","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Ranking Readiness","description":"Validates ranking input completeness and profile compatibility for domain-level aggregation, route grouping, and canonical origin consistency. Evidence should include score and profile evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Ranking Readiness appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ranking readiness evidence for sitespeed domain scope, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-domain-45","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","domain","ranking","integrity","ranking-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/rankings/domains').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-domain check:45","humanCommand":"Validate domain-scoped comparisons using sitespeed domainTests style checks; review the ranking-readiness evidence dimension for Sitespeed Domain Scope"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-domain-46","testId":"ni-sitespeed-domain-46","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Network Contribution","description":"Validates PlatPhorm network contribution through discovery, integrations, and standards compliance for domain-level aggregation, route grouping, and canonical origin consistency. Evidence should include network graph and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Network Contribution appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the network contribution evidence for sitespeed domain scope, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-domain-46","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","domain","ranking","integrity","network-contribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/rankings/domains').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-domain check:46","humanCommand":"Validate domain-scoped comparisons using sitespeed domainTests style checks; review the network-contribution evidence dimension for Sitespeed Domain Scope"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-domain-47","testId":"ni-sitespeed-domain-47","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Report Readiness","description":"Validates report/export categorization with public-safe evidence and protected boundaries for domain-level aggregation, route grouping, and canonical origin consistency. Evidence should include report section mapping evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Report Readiness appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the report readiness evidence for sitespeed domain scope, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-domain-47","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","domain","ranking","integrity","report-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/rankings/domains').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-domain check:47","humanCommand":"Validate domain-scoped comparisons using sitespeed domainTests style checks; review the report-readiness evidence dimension for Sitespeed Domain Scope"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-domain-48","testId":"ni-sitespeed-domain-48","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Operator Actionability","description":"Validates clear remediation, owner action, difficulty, and retest path for domain-level aggregation, route grouping, and canonical origin consistency. Evidence should include fix instructions and command evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Operator Actionability appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the operator actionability evidence for sitespeed domain scope, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-domain-48","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","domain","ranking","integrity","operator-actionability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/rankings/domains').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-domain check:48","humanCommand":"Validate domain-scoped comparisons using sitespeed domainTests style checks; review the operator-actionability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Domain Scope"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-domain-49","testId":"ni-sitespeed-domain-49","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Degraded State","description":"Validates honest degraded, unavailable, skipped, and not-applicable states for domain-level aggregation, route grouping, and canonical origin consistency. Evidence should include status and storage evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Degraded State appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the degraded state evidence for sitespeed domain scope, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-domain-49","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","domain","ranking","integrity","degraded-state","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/rankings/domains').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-domain check:49","humanCommand":"Validate domain-scoped comparisons using sitespeed domainTests style checks; review the degraded-state evidence dimension for Sitespeed Domain Scope"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-domain-50","testId":"ni-sitespeed-domain-50","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Reproducibility","description":"Validates stable CLI/API/human reproduction path and deterministic rerun instructions for domain-level aggregation, route grouping, and canonical origin consistency. Evidence should include commands and registry version evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Domain Scope: Reproducibility appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the reproducibility evidence for sitespeed domain scope, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-domain-50","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","domain","ranking","integrity","reproducibility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/rankings/domains').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-domain check:50","humanCommand":"Validate domain-scoped comparisons using sitespeed domainTests style checks; review the reproducibility evidence dimension for Sitespeed Domain Scope"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-01","testId":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-01","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Availability","description":"Validates public route availability and successful bounded fetch behavior for metric persistence shape, naming consistency, and transport reliability. Evidence should include HTTP status, timeout, and redirect evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Availability appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the availability evidence for sitespeed time-series integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-graphite-01","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","graphite","metrics","timeseries","availability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/timeline').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-graphite check:1","humanCommand":"Confirm metric series consistency with sitespeed graphiteTests-oriented checks; review the availability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-02","testId":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-02","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Public Safety","description":"Validates public-safe access boundaries without exposing private or protected data for metric persistence shape, naming consistency, and transport reliability. Evidence should include route policy and response-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Public Safety appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the public safety evidence for sitespeed time-series integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-graphite-02","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","graphite","metrics","timeseries","public-safety","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/timeline').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-graphite check:2","humanCommand":"Confirm metric series consistency with sitespeed graphiteTests-oriented checks; review the public-safety evidence dimension for Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-03","testId":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-03","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Canonical Url","description":"Validates canonical URL stability and normalized route identity for metric persistence shape, naming consistency, and transport reliability. Evidence should include canonical tags, redirects, and normalized URL evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Canonical Url appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the canonical url evidence for sitespeed time-series integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-graphite-03","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","graphite","metrics","timeseries","canonical-url","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/timeline').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-graphite check:3","humanCommand":"Confirm metric series consistency with sitespeed graphiteTests-oriented checks; review the canonical-url evidence dimension for Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-04","testId":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-04","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Metadata Clarity","description":"Validates title, description, and page-specific metadata clarity for metric persistence shape, naming consistency, and transport reliability. Evidence should include HTML metadata and extracted text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Metadata Clarity appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the metadata clarity evidence for sitespeed time-series integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-graphite-04","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","graphite","metrics","timeseries","metadata-clarity","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/timeline').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-graphite check:4","humanCommand":"Confirm metric series consistency with sitespeed graphiteTests-oriented checks; review the metadata-clarity evidence dimension for Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-05","testId":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-05","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Semantic Structure","description":"Validates semantic HTML structure for humans, agents, and assistive technology for metric persistence shape, naming consistency, and transport reliability. Evidence should include heading, landmark, and element evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Semantic Structure appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the semantic structure evidence for sitespeed time-series integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-graphite-05","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","graphite","metrics","timeseries","semantic-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/timeline').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-graphite check:5","humanCommand":"Confirm metric series consistency with sitespeed graphiteTests-oriented checks; review the semantic-structure evidence dimension for Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-06","testId":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-06","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Machine Readability","description":"Validates machine-readable public content and predictable parsing surfaces for metric persistence shape, naming consistency, and transport reliability. Evidence should include structured tags, JSON-LD, and document-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Machine Readability appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the machine readability evidence for sitespeed time-series integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-graphite-06","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","graphite","metrics","timeseries","machine-readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/timeline').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-graphite check:6","humanCommand":"Confirm metric series consistency with sitespeed graphiteTests-oriented checks; review the machine-readability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-07","testId":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-07","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Agent Discovery","description":"Validates agent discovery hints and AI-readable policy/documentation signals for metric persistence shape, naming consistency, and transport reliability. Evidence should include llms, policy, MCP, OpenAPI, or schema evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Agent Discovery appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the agent discovery evidence for sitespeed time-series integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-graphite-07","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","graphite","metrics","timeseries","agent-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/timeline').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-graphite check:7","humanCommand":"Confirm metric series consistency with sitespeed graphiteTests-oriented checks; review the agent-discovery evidence dimension for Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-08","testId":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-08","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Crawler Discovery","description":"Validates crawler discovery paths through robots, sitemap, feeds, and canonical links for metric persistence shape, naming consistency, and transport reliability. Evidence should include discovery artifact and link evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Crawler Discovery appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the crawler discovery evidence for sitespeed time-series integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-graphite-08","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","graphite","metrics","timeseries","crawler-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/timeline').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-graphite check:8","humanCommand":"Confirm metric series consistency with sitespeed graphiteTests-oriented checks; review the crawler-discovery evidence dimension for Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-09","testId":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-09","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Answerability","description":"Validates direct answer extraction and quotable explanatory content for metric persistence shape, naming consistency, and transport reliability. Evidence should include question, summary, heading, and paragraph evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Answerability appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the answerability evidence for sitespeed time-series integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-graphite-09","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","graphite","metrics","timeseries","answerability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/timeline').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-graphite check:9","humanCommand":"Confirm metric series consistency with sitespeed graphiteTests-oriented checks; review the answerability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-10","testId":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-10","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Generative Context","description":"Validates GEO context quality for generative engines without inventing measured facts for metric persistence shape, naming consistency, and transport reliability. Evidence should include entity, source, and instruction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Generative Context appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the generative context evidence for sitespeed time-series integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-graphite-10","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","graphite","metrics","timeseries","generative-context","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/timeline').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-graphite check:10","humanCommand":"Confirm metric series consistency with sitespeed graphiteTests-oriented checks; review the generative-context evidence dimension for Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-11","testId":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-11","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Search Intent","description":"Validates search intent alignment and snippet-friendly content structure for metric persistence shape, naming consistency, and transport reliability. Evidence should include metadata, headings, and topical text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Search Intent appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the search intent evidence for sitespeed time-series integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-graphite-11","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","graphite","metrics","timeseries","search-intent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/timeline').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-graphite check:11","humanCommand":"Confirm metric series consistency with sitespeed graphiteTests-oriented checks; review the search-intent evidence dimension for Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-12","testId":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-12","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Accessibility Semantics","description":"Validates accessible names, relationships, landmarks, and keyboard-relevant structure for metric persistence shape, naming consistency, and transport reliability. Evidence should include ARIA, labels, landmarks, and control evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Accessibility Semantics appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the accessibility semantics evidence for sitespeed time-series integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-graphite-12","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","graphite","metrics","timeseries","accessibility-semantics","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/timeline').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-graphite check:12","humanCommand":"Confirm metric series consistency with sitespeed graphiteTests-oriented checks; review the accessibility-semantics evidence dimension for Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-13","testId":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-13","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Mobile Readiness","description":"Validates mobile viewport, responsive content, and touch-friendly layout signals for metric persistence shape, naming consistency, and transport reliability. Evidence should include viewport and responsive asset evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Mobile Readiness appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the mobile readiness evidence for sitespeed time-series integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-graphite-13","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","graphite","metrics","timeseries","mobile-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/timeline').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-graphite check:13","humanCommand":"Confirm metric series consistency with sitespeed graphiteTests-oriented checks; review the mobile-readiness evidence dimension for Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-14","testId":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-14","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Performance Budget","description":"Validates performance budget compliance using measured or bounded deterministic inputs for metric persistence shape, naming consistency, and transport reliability. Evidence should include timing, byte, and Lighthouse-derived evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Performance Budget appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the performance budget evidence for sitespeed time-series integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-graphite-14","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","graphite","metrics","timeseries","performance-budget","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/timeline').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-graphite check:14","humanCommand":"Confirm metric series consistency with sitespeed graphiteTests-oriented checks; review the performance-budget evidence dimension for Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-15","testId":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-15","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Resource Efficiency","description":"Validates resource size, script/style count, and optimization opportunity signals for metric persistence shape, naming consistency, and transport reliability. Evidence should include resource and markup evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Resource Efficiency appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the resource efficiency evidence for sitespeed time-series integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-graphite-15","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","graphite","metrics","timeseries","resource-efficiency","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/timeline').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-graphite check:15","humanCommand":"Confirm metric series consistency with sitespeed graphiteTests-oriented checks; review the resource-efficiency evidence dimension for Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-16","testId":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-16","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Cache Freshness","description":"Validates cache behavior, freshness hints, and stale-content risk for metric persistence shape, naming consistency, and transport reliability. Evidence should include HTTP cache and timestamp evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Cache Freshness appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the cache freshness evidence for sitespeed time-series integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-graphite-16","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","graphite","metrics","timeseries","cache-freshness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/timeline').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-graphite check:16","humanCommand":"Confirm metric series consistency with sitespeed graphiteTests-oriented checks; review the cache-freshness evidence dimension for Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-17","testId":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-17","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Route Reliability","description":"Validates route reliability, redirect safety, and dead-link risk for metric persistence shape, naming consistency, and transport reliability. Evidence should include status, redirect, and sitemap evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Route Reliability appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the route reliability evidence for sitespeed time-series integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-graphite-17","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","graphite","metrics","timeseries","route-reliability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/timeline').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-graphite check:17","humanCommand":"Confirm metric series consistency with sitespeed graphiteTests-oriented checks; review the route-reliability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-18","testId":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-18","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Feed Quality","description":"Validates RSS/Atom/feed usefulness, parseability, and freshness for metric persistence shape, naming consistency, and transport reliability. Evidence should include feed XML and item evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Feed Quality appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the feed quality evidence for sitespeed time-series integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-graphite-18","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","graphite","metrics","timeseries","feed-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/timeline').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-graphite check:18","humanCommand":"Confirm metric series consistency with sitespeed graphiteTests-oriented checks; review the feed-quality evidence dimension for Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-19","testId":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-19","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Sitemap Quality","description":"Validates sitemap validity, public-safe URL coverage, and no-dead-link policy for metric persistence shape, naming consistency, and transport reliability. Evidence should include sitemap XML and bounded link-check evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Sitemap Quality appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the sitemap quality evidence for sitespeed time-series integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-graphite-19","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","graphite","metrics","timeseries","sitemap-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/timeline').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-graphite check:19","humanCommand":"Confirm metric series consistency with sitespeed graphiteTests-oriented checks; review the sitemap-quality evidence dimension for Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-20","testId":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-20","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Robots Alignment","description":"Validates robots.txt alignment with public/protected policy and sitemap discovery for metric persistence shape, naming consistency, and transport reliability. Evidence should include robots directives and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Robots Alignment appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the robots alignment evidence for sitespeed time-series integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-graphite-20","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","graphite","metrics","timeseries","robots-alignment","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/timeline').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-graphite check:20","humanCommand":"Confirm metric series consistency with sitespeed graphiteTests-oriented checks; review the robots-alignment evidence dimension for Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-21","testId":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-21","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Llms Structure","description":"Validates llms.txt structure, readability, endpoint coverage, and agent usefulness for metric persistence shape, naming consistency, and transport reliability. Evidence should include plain-text section and line-length evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Llms Structure appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms structure evidence for sitespeed time-series integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-graphite-21","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","graphite","metrics","timeseries","llms-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/timeline').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-graphite check:21","humanCommand":"Confirm metric series consistency with sitespeed graphiteTests-oriented checks; review the llms-structure evidence dimension for Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-22","testId":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-22","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Llms Index Schema","description":"Validates llms-index JSON schema shape and count reconciliation for metric persistence shape, naming consistency, and transport reliability. Evidence should include JSON keys, counts, and endpoint evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Llms Index Schema appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms index schema evidence for sitespeed time-series integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-graphite-22","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","graphite","metrics","timeseries","llms-index-schema","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/timeline').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-graphite check:22","humanCommand":"Confirm metric series consistency with sitespeed graphiteTests-oriented checks; review the llms-index-schema evidence dimension for Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-23","testId":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-23","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Humans Attribution","description":"Validates humans.txt attribution, maintainer, technology, and governance transparency for metric persistence shape, naming consistency, and transport reliability. Evidence should include humans.txt section evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Humans Attribution appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the humans attribution evidence for sitespeed time-series integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-graphite-23","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","graphite","metrics","timeseries","humans-attribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/timeline').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-graphite check:23","humanCommand":"Confirm metric series consistency with sitespeed graphiteTests-oriented checks; review the humans-attribution evidence dimension for Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-24","testId":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-24","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Agent Policy","description":"Validates agent-policy JSON clarity for allowed, disallowed, and protected operations for metric persistence shape, naming consistency, and transport reliability. Evidence should include well-known policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Agent Policy appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the agent policy evidence for sitespeed time-series integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-graphite-24","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","graphite","metrics","timeseries","agent-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/timeline').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-graphite check:24","humanCommand":"Confirm metric series consistency with sitespeed graphiteTests-oriented checks; review the agent-policy evidence dimension for Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-25","testId":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-25","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Ai Policy","description":"Validates AI policy clarity for training, search, answer use, caching, and attribution for metric persistence shape, naming consistency, and transport reliability. Evidence should include well-known AI policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Ai Policy appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ai policy evidence for sitespeed time-series integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-graphite-25","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","graphite","metrics","timeseries","ai-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/timeline').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-graphite check:25","humanCommand":"Confirm metric series consistency with sitespeed graphiteTests-oriented checks; review the ai-policy evidence dimension for Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-26","testId":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-26","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Trust Policy","description":"Validates trust policy coverage for privacy, traceability, metadata, and protected actions for metric persistence shape, naming consistency, and transport reliability. Evidence should include trust.json evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Trust Policy appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the trust policy evidence for sitespeed time-series integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-graphite-26","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","graphite","metrics","timeseries","trust-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/timeline').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-graphite check:26","humanCommand":"Confirm metric series consistency with sitespeed graphiteTests-oriented checks; review the trust-policy evidence dimension for Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-27","testId":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-27","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Openapi Contract","description":"Validates OpenAPI availability, server URL accuracy, schemas, and auth policy for metric persistence shape, naming consistency, and transport reliability. Evidence should include OpenAPI text/JSON evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Openapi Contract appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the openapi contract evidence for sitespeed time-series integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-graphite-27","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","graphite","metrics","timeseries","openapi-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/timeline').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-graphite check:27","humanCommand":"Confirm metric series consistency with sitespeed graphiteTests-oriented checks; review the openapi-contract evidence dimension for Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-28","testId":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-28","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Mcp Contract","description":"Validates MCP JSON-RPC introspection, real tools, resources, and protected boundaries for metric persistence shape, naming consistency, and transport reliability. Evidence should include MCP manifest and initialize evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Mcp Contract appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the mcp contract evidence for sitespeed time-series integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-graphite-28","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","graphite","metrics","timeseries","mcp-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/timeline').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-graphite check:28","humanCommand":"Confirm metric series consistency with sitespeed graphiteTests-oriented checks; review the mcp-contract evidence dimension for Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-29","testId":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-29","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Api Error Shape","description":"Validates API success/error response shape consistency for metric persistence shape, naming consistency, and transport reliability. Evidence should include REST envelope evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Api Error Shape appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the api error shape evidence for sitespeed time-series integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-graphite-29","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","graphite","metrics","timeseries","api-error-shape","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/timeline').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-graphite check:29","humanCommand":"Confirm metric series consistency with sitespeed graphiteTests-oriented checks; review the api-error-shape evidence dimension for Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-30","testId":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-30","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Traceability","description":"Validates trace propagation, request IDs, and safe observability correlation for metric persistence shape, naming consistency, and transport reliability. Evidence should include trace header and metadata evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Traceability appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the traceability evidence for sitespeed time-series integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-graphite-30","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","graphite","metrics","timeseries","traceability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/timeline').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-graphite check:30","humanCommand":"Confirm metric series consistency with sitespeed graphiteTests-oriented checks; review the traceability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-31","testId":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-31","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Ja4 Redaction","description":"Validates fingerprint-adjacent metadata redaction and non-public raw JA4 handling for metric persistence shape, naming consistency, and transport reliability. Evidence should include metadata policy and redaction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Ja4 Redaction appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the ja4 redaction evidence for sitespeed time-series integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-graphite-31","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","graphite","metrics","timeseries","ja4-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/timeline').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-graphite check:31","humanCommand":"Confirm metric series consistency with sitespeed graphiteTests-oriented checks; review the ja4-redaction evidence dimension for Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-32","testId":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-32","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Secret Redaction","description":"Validates absence of secrets, generic key examples, cookies, and raw tokens in public outputs for metric persistence shape, naming consistency, and transport reliability. Evidence should include public artifact scan evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Secret Redaction appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the secret redaction evidence for sitespeed time-series integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-graphite-32","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","graphite","metrics","timeseries","secret-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/timeline').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-graphite check:32","humanCommand":"Confirm metric series consistency with sitespeed graphiteTests-oriented checks; review the secret-redaction evidence dimension for Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-33","testId":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-33","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Security Headers","description":"Validates security header coverage and hardened transport signals for metric persistence shape, naming consistency, and transport reliability. Evidence should include HTTP header evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Security Headers appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the security headers evidence for sitespeed time-series integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-graphite-33","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","graphite","metrics","timeseries","security-headers","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/timeline').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-graphite check:33","humanCommand":"Confirm metric series consistency with sitespeed graphiteTests-oriented checks; review the security-headers evidence dimension for Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-34","testId":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-34","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Privacy Consent","description":"Validates privacy policy, consent, attribution, and data-use disclosure quality for metric persistence shape, naming consistency, and transport reliability. Evidence should include public page and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Privacy Consent appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the privacy consent evidence for sitespeed time-series integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-graphite-34","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","graphite","metrics","timeseries","privacy-consent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/timeline').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-graphite check:34","humanCommand":"Confirm metric series consistency with sitespeed graphiteTests-oriented checks; review the privacy-consent evidence dimension for Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-35","testId":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-35","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Structured Data","description":"Validates JSON-LD and entity modeling for machine interpretation for metric persistence shape, naming consistency, and transport reliability. Evidence should include schema block and parse evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Structured Data appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the structured data evidence for sitespeed time-series integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-graphite-35","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","graphite","metrics","timeseries","structured-data","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/timeline').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-graphite check:35","humanCommand":"Confirm metric series consistency with sitespeed graphiteTests-oriented checks; review the structured-data evidence dimension for Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-36","testId":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-36","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Social Preview","description":"Validates Open Graph and Twitter/X card readiness for public sharing for metric persistence shape, naming consistency, and transport reliability. Evidence should include meta tag evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Social Preview appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the social preview evidence for sitespeed time-series integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-graphite-36","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","graphite","metrics","timeseries","social-preview","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/timeline').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-graphite check:36","humanCommand":"Confirm metric series consistency with sitespeed graphiteTests-oriented checks; review the social-preview evidence dimension for Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-37","testId":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-37","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: I18n Routing","description":"Validates locale route, hreflang, language declaration, and translation readiness for metric persistence shape, naming consistency, and transport reliability. Evidence should include lang/hreflang and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: I18n Routing appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the i18n routing evidence for sitespeed time-series integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-graphite-37","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","graphite","metrics","timeseries","i18n-routing","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/timeline').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-graphite check:37","humanCommand":"Confirm metric series consistency with sitespeed graphiteTests-oriented checks; review the i18n-routing evidence dimension for Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-38","testId":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-38","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Readability","description":"Validates human readability, sectioning, sentence complexity, and comprehension support for metric persistence shape, naming consistency, and transport reliability. Evidence should include extracted content evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Readability appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the readability evidence for sitespeed time-series integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-graphite-38","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","graphite","metrics","timeseries","readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/timeline').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-graphite check:38","humanCommand":"Confirm metric series consistency with sitespeed graphiteTests-oriented checks; review the readability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-39","testId":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-39","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Content Utility","description":"Validates non-placeholder content usefulness and domain-specific public value for metric persistence shape, naming consistency, and transport reliability. Evidence should include content extraction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Content Utility appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the content utility evidence for sitespeed time-series integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-graphite-39","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","graphite","metrics","timeseries","content-utility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/timeline').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-graphite check:39","humanCommand":"Confirm metric series consistency with sitespeed graphiteTests-oriented checks; review the content-utility evidence dimension for Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-40","testId":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-40","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Recommendation Grounding","description":"Validates recommendation grounding in deterministic evidence instead of fabricated model output for metric persistence shape, naming consistency, and transport reliability. Evidence should include issue and remediation evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Recommendation Grounding appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the recommendation grounding evidence for sitespeed time-series integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-graphite-40","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","graphite","metrics","timeseries","recommendation-grounding","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/timeline').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-graphite check:40","humanCommand":"Confirm metric series consistency with sitespeed graphiteTests-oriented checks; review the recommendation-grounding evidence dimension for Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-41","testId":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-41","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Evidence Quality","description":"Validates evidence completeness, public safety, and reproducibility for metric persistence shape, naming consistency, and transport reliability. Evidence should include test output and artifact evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Evidence Quality appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the evidence quality evidence for sitespeed time-series integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-graphite-41","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","graphite","metrics","timeseries","evidence-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/timeline').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-graphite check:41","humanCommand":"Confirm metric series consistency with sitespeed graphiteTests-oriented checks; review the evidence-quality evidence dimension for Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-42","testId":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-42","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Threshold Policy","description":"Validates threshold clarity, pass/warn/fail semantics, and scoring transparency for metric persistence shape, naming consistency, and transport reliability. Evidence should include threshold and result status evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Threshold Policy appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the threshold policy evidence for sitespeed time-series integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-graphite-42","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","graphite","metrics","timeseries","threshold-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/timeline').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-graphite check:42","humanCommand":"Confirm metric series consistency with sitespeed graphiteTests-oriented checks; review the threshold-policy evidence dimension for Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-43","testId":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-43","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Confidence","description":"Validates confidence scoring and degraded-input disclosure for metric persistence shape, naming consistency, and transport reliability. Evidence should include source freshness and input availability evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Confidence appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the confidence evidence for sitespeed time-series integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-graphite-43","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","graphite","metrics","timeseries","confidence","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/timeline').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-graphite check:43","humanCommand":"Confirm metric series consistency with sitespeed graphiteTests-oriented checks; review the confidence evidence dimension for Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-44","testId":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-44","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Trend Readiness","description":"Validates historical comparability and timeline readiness for future reruns for metric persistence shape, naming consistency, and transport reliability. Evidence should include analysis ID, timestamp, and persistence evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Trend Readiness appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the trend readiness evidence for sitespeed time-series integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-graphite-44","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","graphite","metrics","timeseries","trend-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/timeline').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-graphite check:44","humanCommand":"Confirm metric series consistency with sitespeed graphiteTests-oriented checks; review the trend-readiness evidence dimension for Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-45","testId":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-45","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Ranking Readiness","description":"Validates ranking input completeness and profile compatibility for metric persistence shape, naming consistency, and transport reliability. Evidence should include score and profile evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Ranking Readiness appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ranking readiness evidence for sitespeed time-series integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-graphite-45","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","graphite","metrics","timeseries","ranking-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/timeline').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-graphite check:45","humanCommand":"Confirm metric series consistency with sitespeed graphiteTests-oriented checks; review the ranking-readiness evidence dimension for Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-46","testId":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-46","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Network Contribution","description":"Validates PlatPhorm network contribution through discovery, integrations, and standards compliance for metric persistence shape, naming consistency, and transport reliability. Evidence should include network graph and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Network Contribution appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the network contribution evidence for sitespeed time-series integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-graphite-46","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","graphite","metrics","timeseries","network-contribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/timeline').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-graphite check:46","humanCommand":"Confirm metric series consistency with sitespeed graphiteTests-oriented checks; review the network-contribution evidence dimension for Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-47","testId":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-47","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Report Readiness","description":"Validates report/export categorization with public-safe evidence and protected boundaries for metric persistence shape, naming consistency, and transport reliability. Evidence should include report section mapping evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Report Readiness appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the report readiness evidence for sitespeed time-series integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-graphite-47","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","graphite","metrics","timeseries","report-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/timeline').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-graphite check:47","humanCommand":"Confirm metric series consistency with sitespeed graphiteTests-oriented checks; review the report-readiness evidence dimension for Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-48","testId":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-48","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Operator Actionability","description":"Validates clear remediation, owner action, difficulty, and retest path for metric persistence shape, naming consistency, and transport reliability. Evidence should include fix instructions and command evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Operator Actionability appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the operator actionability evidence for sitespeed time-series integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-graphite-48","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","graphite","metrics","timeseries","operator-actionability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/timeline').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-graphite check:48","humanCommand":"Confirm metric series consistency with sitespeed graphiteTests-oriented checks; review the operator-actionability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-49","testId":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-49","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Degraded State","description":"Validates honest degraded, unavailable, skipped, and not-applicable states for metric persistence shape, naming consistency, and transport reliability. Evidence should include status and storage evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Degraded State appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the degraded state evidence for sitespeed time-series integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-graphite-49","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","graphite","metrics","timeseries","degraded-state","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/timeline').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-graphite check:49","humanCommand":"Confirm metric series consistency with sitespeed graphiteTests-oriented checks; review the degraded-state evidence dimension for Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-50","testId":"ni-sitespeed-graphite-50","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Reproducibility","description":"Validates stable CLI/API/human reproduction path and deterministic rerun instructions for metric persistence shape, naming consistency, and transport reliability. Evidence should include commands and registry version evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity: Reproducibility appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the reproducibility evidence for sitespeed time-series integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-graphite-50","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","graphite","metrics","timeseries","reproducibility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/timeline').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-graphite check:50","humanCommand":"Confirm metric series consistency with sitespeed graphiteTests-oriented checks; review the reproducibility evidence dimension for Sitespeed Time-Series Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-path-01","testId":"ni-sitespeed-path-01","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Availability","description":"Validates public route availability and successful bounded fetch behavior for path normalization, route traversal safety, and deterministic path semantics. Evidence should include HTTP status, timeout, and redirect evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Availability appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the availability evidence for sitespeed path and folder handling, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-path-01","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","paths","routes","crawlability","availability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-path check:1","humanCommand":"Validate folder/path behavior against sitespeed pathToFolderTests concerns; review the availability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-path-02","testId":"ni-sitespeed-path-02","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Public Safety","description":"Validates public-safe access boundaries without exposing private or protected data for path normalization, route traversal safety, and deterministic path semantics. Evidence should include route policy and response-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Public Safety appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the public safety evidence for sitespeed path and folder handling, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-path-02","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","paths","routes","crawlability","public-safety","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-path check:2","humanCommand":"Validate folder/path behavior against sitespeed pathToFolderTests concerns; review the public-safety evidence dimension for Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-path-03","testId":"ni-sitespeed-path-03","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Canonical Url","description":"Validates canonical URL stability and normalized route identity for path normalization, route traversal safety, and deterministic path semantics. Evidence should include canonical tags, redirects, and normalized URL evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Canonical Url appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the canonical url evidence for sitespeed path and folder handling, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-path-03","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","paths","routes","crawlability","canonical-url","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-path check:3","humanCommand":"Validate folder/path behavior against sitespeed pathToFolderTests concerns; review the canonical-url evidence dimension for Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-path-04","testId":"ni-sitespeed-path-04","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Metadata Clarity","description":"Validates title, description, and page-specific metadata clarity for path normalization, route traversal safety, and deterministic path semantics. Evidence should include HTML metadata and extracted text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Metadata Clarity appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the metadata clarity evidence for sitespeed path and folder handling, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-path-04","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","paths","routes","crawlability","metadata-clarity","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-path check:4","humanCommand":"Validate folder/path behavior against sitespeed pathToFolderTests concerns; review the metadata-clarity evidence dimension for Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-path-05","testId":"ni-sitespeed-path-05","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Semantic Structure","description":"Validates semantic HTML structure for humans, agents, and assistive technology for path normalization, route traversal safety, and deterministic path semantics. Evidence should include heading, landmark, and element evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Semantic Structure appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the semantic structure evidence for sitespeed path and folder handling, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-path-05","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","paths","routes","crawlability","semantic-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-path check:5","humanCommand":"Validate folder/path behavior against sitespeed pathToFolderTests concerns; review the semantic-structure evidence dimension for Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-path-06","testId":"ni-sitespeed-path-06","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Machine Readability","description":"Validates machine-readable public content and predictable parsing surfaces for path normalization, route traversal safety, and deterministic path semantics. Evidence should include structured tags, JSON-LD, and document-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Machine Readability appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the machine readability evidence for sitespeed path and folder handling, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-path-06","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","paths","routes","crawlability","machine-readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-path check:6","humanCommand":"Validate folder/path behavior against sitespeed pathToFolderTests concerns; review the machine-readability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-path-07","testId":"ni-sitespeed-path-07","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Agent Discovery","description":"Validates agent discovery hints and AI-readable policy/documentation signals for path normalization, route traversal safety, and deterministic path semantics. Evidence should include llms, policy, MCP, OpenAPI, or schema evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Agent Discovery appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the agent discovery evidence for sitespeed path and folder handling, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-path-07","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","paths","routes","crawlability","agent-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-path check:7","humanCommand":"Validate folder/path behavior against sitespeed pathToFolderTests concerns; review the agent-discovery evidence dimension for Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-path-08","testId":"ni-sitespeed-path-08","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Crawler Discovery","description":"Validates crawler discovery paths through robots, sitemap, feeds, and canonical links for path normalization, route traversal safety, and deterministic path semantics. Evidence should include discovery artifact and link evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Crawler Discovery appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the crawler discovery evidence for sitespeed path and folder handling, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-path-08","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","paths","routes","crawlability","crawler-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-path check:8","humanCommand":"Validate folder/path behavior against sitespeed pathToFolderTests concerns; review the crawler-discovery evidence dimension for Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-path-09","testId":"ni-sitespeed-path-09","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Answerability","description":"Validates direct answer extraction and quotable explanatory content for path normalization, route traversal safety, and deterministic path semantics. Evidence should include question, summary, heading, and paragraph evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Answerability appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the answerability evidence for sitespeed path and folder handling, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-path-09","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","paths","routes","crawlability","answerability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-path check:9","humanCommand":"Validate folder/path behavior against sitespeed pathToFolderTests concerns; review the answerability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-path-10","testId":"ni-sitespeed-path-10","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Generative Context","description":"Validates GEO context quality for generative engines without inventing measured facts for path normalization, route traversal safety, and deterministic path semantics. Evidence should include entity, source, and instruction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Generative Context appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the generative context evidence for sitespeed path and folder handling, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-path-10","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","paths","routes","crawlability","generative-context","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-path check:10","humanCommand":"Validate folder/path behavior against sitespeed pathToFolderTests concerns; review the generative-context evidence dimension for Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-path-11","testId":"ni-sitespeed-path-11","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Search Intent","description":"Validates search intent alignment and snippet-friendly content structure for path normalization, route traversal safety, and deterministic path semantics. Evidence should include metadata, headings, and topical text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Search Intent appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the search intent evidence for sitespeed path and folder handling, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-path-11","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","paths","routes","crawlability","search-intent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-path check:11","humanCommand":"Validate folder/path behavior against sitespeed pathToFolderTests concerns; review the search-intent evidence dimension for Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-path-12","testId":"ni-sitespeed-path-12","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Accessibility Semantics","description":"Validates accessible names, relationships, landmarks, and keyboard-relevant structure for path normalization, route traversal safety, and deterministic path semantics. Evidence should include ARIA, labels, landmarks, and control evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Accessibility Semantics appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the accessibility semantics evidence for sitespeed path and folder handling, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-path-12","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","paths","routes","crawlability","accessibility-semantics","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-path check:12","humanCommand":"Validate folder/path behavior against sitespeed pathToFolderTests concerns; review the accessibility-semantics evidence dimension for Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-path-13","testId":"ni-sitespeed-path-13","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Mobile Readiness","description":"Validates mobile viewport, responsive content, and touch-friendly layout signals for path normalization, route traversal safety, and deterministic path semantics. Evidence should include viewport and responsive asset evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Mobile Readiness appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the mobile readiness evidence for sitespeed path and folder handling, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-path-13","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","paths","routes","crawlability","mobile-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-path check:13","humanCommand":"Validate folder/path behavior against sitespeed pathToFolderTests concerns; review the mobile-readiness evidence dimension for Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-path-14","testId":"ni-sitespeed-path-14","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Performance Budget","description":"Validates performance budget compliance using measured or bounded deterministic inputs for path normalization, route traversal safety, and deterministic path semantics. Evidence should include timing, byte, and Lighthouse-derived evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Performance Budget appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the performance budget evidence for sitespeed path and folder handling, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-path-14","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","paths","routes","crawlability","performance-budget","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-path check:14","humanCommand":"Validate folder/path behavior against sitespeed pathToFolderTests concerns; review the performance-budget evidence dimension for Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-path-15","testId":"ni-sitespeed-path-15","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Resource Efficiency","description":"Validates resource size, script/style count, and optimization opportunity signals for path normalization, route traversal safety, and deterministic path semantics. Evidence should include resource and markup evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Resource Efficiency appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the resource efficiency evidence for sitespeed path and folder handling, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-path-15","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","paths","routes","crawlability","resource-efficiency","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-path check:15","humanCommand":"Validate folder/path behavior against sitespeed pathToFolderTests concerns; review the resource-efficiency evidence dimension for Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-path-16","testId":"ni-sitespeed-path-16","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Cache Freshness","description":"Validates cache behavior, freshness hints, and stale-content risk for path normalization, route traversal safety, and deterministic path semantics. Evidence should include HTTP cache and timestamp evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Cache Freshness appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the cache freshness evidence for sitespeed path and folder handling, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-path-16","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","paths","routes","crawlability","cache-freshness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-path check:16","humanCommand":"Validate folder/path behavior against sitespeed pathToFolderTests concerns; review the cache-freshness evidence dimension for Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-path-17","testId":"ni-sitespeed-path-17","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Route Reliability","description":"Validates route reliability, redirect safety, and dead-link risk for path normalization, route traversal safety, and deterministic path semantics. Evidence should include status, redirect, and sitemap evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Route Reliability appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the route reliability evidence for sitespeed path and folder handling, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-path-17","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","paths","routes","crawlability","route-reliability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-path check:17","humanCommand":"Validate folder/path behavior against sitespeed pathToFolderTests concerns; review the route-reliability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-path-18","testId":"ni-sitespeed-path-18","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Feed Quality","description":"Validates RSS/Atom/feed usefulness, parseability, and freshness for path normalization, route traversal safety, and deterministic path semantics. Evidence should include feed XML and item evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Feed Quality appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the feed quality evidence for sitespeed path and folder handling, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-path-18","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","paths","routes","crawlability","feed-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-path check:18","humanCommand":"Validate folder/path behavior against sitespeed pathToFolderTests concerns; review the feed-quality evidence dimension for Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-path-19","testId":"ni-sitespeed-path-19","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Sitemap Quality","description":"Validates sitemap validity, public-safe URL coverage, and no-dead-link policy for path normalization, route traversal safety, and deterministic path semantics. Evidence should include sitemap XML and bounded link-check evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Sitemap Quality appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the sitemap quality evidence for sitespeed path and folder handling, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-path-19","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","paths","routes","crawlability","sitemap-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-path check:19","humanCommand":"Validate folder/path behavior against sitespeed pathToFolderTests concerns; review the sitemap-quality evidence dimension for Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-path-20","testId":"ni-sitespeed-path-20","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Robots Alignment","description":"Validates robots.txt alignment with public/protected policy and sitemap discovery for path normalization, route traversal safety, and deterministic path semantics. Evidence should include robots directives and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Robots Alignment appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the robots alignment evidence for sitespeed path and folder handling, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-path-20","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","paths","routes","crawlability","robots-alignment","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-path check:20","humanCommand":"Validate folder/path behavior against sitespeed pathToFolderTests concerns; review the robots-alignment evidence dimension for Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-path-21","testId":"ni-sitespeed-path-21","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Llms Structure","description":"Validates llms.txt structure, readability, endpoint coverage, and agent usefulness for path normalization, route traversal safety, and deterministic path semantics. Evidence should include plain-text section and line-length evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Llms Structure appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms structure evidence for sitespeed path and folder handling, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-path-21","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","paths","routes","crawlability","llms-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-path check:21","humanCommand":"Validate folder/path behavior against sitespeed pathToFolderTests concerns; review the llms-structure evidence dimension for Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-path-22","testId":"ni-sitespeed-path-22","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Llms Index Schema","description":"Validates llms-index JSON schema shape and count reconciliation for path normalization, route traversal safety, and deterministic path semantics. Evidence should include JSON keys, counts, and endpoint evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Llms Index Schema appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms index schema evidence for sitespeed path and folder handling, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-path-22","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","paths","routes","crawlability","llms-index-schema","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-path check:22","humanCommand":"Validate folder/path behavior against sitespeed pathToFolderTests concerns; review the llms-index-schema evidence dimension for Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-path-23","testId":"ni-sitespeed-path-23","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Humans Attribution","description":"Validates humans.txt attribution, maintainer, technology, and governance transparency for path normalization, route traversal safety, and deterministic path semantics. Evidence should include humans.txt section evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Humans Attribution appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the humans attribution evidence for sitespeed path and folder handling, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-path-23","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","paths","routes","crawlability","humans-attribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-path check:23","humanCommand":"Validate folder/path behavior against sitespeed pathToFolderTests concerns; review the humans-attribution evidence dimension for Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-path-24","testId":"ni-sitespeed-path-24","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Agent Policy","description":"Validates agent-policy JSON clarity for allowed, disallowed, and protected operations for path normalization, route traversal safety, and deterministic path semantics. Evidence should include well-known policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Agent Policy appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the agent policy evidence for sitespeed path and folder handling, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-path-24","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","paths","routes","crawlability","agent-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-path check:24","humanCommand":"Validate folder/path behavior against sitespeed pathToFolderTests concerns; review the agent-policy evidence dimension for Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-path-25","testId":"ni-sitespeed-path-25","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Ai Policy","description":"Validates AI policy clarity for training, search, answer use, caching, and attribution for path normalization, route traversal safety, and deterministic path semantics. Evidence should include well-known AI policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Ai Policy appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ai policy evidence for sitespeed path and folder handling, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-path-25","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","paths","routes","crawlability","ai-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-path check:25","humanCommand":"Validate folder/path behavior against sitespeed pathToFolderTests concerns; review the ai-policy evidence dimension for Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-path-26","testId":"ni-sitespeed-path-26","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Trust Policy","description":"Validates trust policy coverage for privacy, traceability, metadata, and protected actions for path normalization, route traversal safety, and deterministic path semantics. Evidence should include trust.json evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Trust Policy appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the trust policy evidence for sitespeed path and folder handling, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-path-26","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","paths","routes","crawlability","trust-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-path check:26","humanCommand":"Validate folder/path behavior against sitespeed pathToFolderTests concerns; review the trust-policy evidence dimension for Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-path-27","testId":"ni-sitespeed-path-27","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Openapi Contract","description":"Validates OpenAPI availability, server URL accuracy, schemas, and auth policy for path normalization, route traversal safety, and deterministic path semantics. Evidence should include OpenAPI text/JSON evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Openapi Contract appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the openapi contract evidence for sitespeed path and folder handling, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-path-27","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","paths","routes","crawlability","openapi-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-path check:27","humanCommand":"Validate folder/path behavior against sitespeed pathToFolderTests concerns; review the openapi-contract evidence dimension for Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-path-28","testId":"ni-sitespeed-path-28","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Mcp Contract","description":"Validates MCP JSON-RPC introspection, real tools, resources, and protected boundaries for path normalization, route traversal safety, and deterministic path semantics. Evidence should include MCP manifest and initialize evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Mcp Contract appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the mcp contract evidence for sitespeed path and folder handling, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-path-28","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","paths","routes","crawlability","mcp-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-path check:28","humanCommand":"Validate folder/path behavior against sitespeed pathToFolderTests concerns; review the mcp-contract evidence dimension for Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-path-29","testId":"ni-sitespeed-path-29","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Api Error Shape","description":"Validates API success/error response shape consistency for path normalization, route traversal safety, and deterministic path semantics. Evidence should include REST envelope evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Api Error Shape appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the api error shape evidence for sitespeed path and folder handling, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-path-29","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","paths","routes","crawlability","api-error-shape","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-path check:29","humanCommand":"Validate folder/path behavior against sitespeed pathToFolderTests concerns; review the api-error-shape evidence dimension for Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-path-30","testId":"ni-sitespeed-path-30","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Traceability","description":"Validates trace propagation, request IDs, and safe observability correlation for path normalization, route traversal safety, and deterministic path semantics. Evidence should include trace header and metadata evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Traceability appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the traceability evidence for sitespeed path and folder handling, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-path-30","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","paths","routes","crawlability","traceability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-path check:30","humanCommand":"Validate folder/path behavior against sitespeed pathToFolderTests concerns; review the traceability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-path-31","testId":"ni-sitespeed-path-31","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Ja4 Redaction","description":"Validates fingerprint-adjacent metadata redaction and non-public raw JA4 handling for path normalization, route traversal safety, and deterministic path semantics. Evidence should include metadata policy and redaction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Ja4 Redaction appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the ja4 redaction evidence for sitespeed path and folder handling, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-path-31","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","paths","routes","crawlability","ja4-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-path check:31","humanCommand":"Validate folder/path behavior against sitespeed pathToFolderTests concerns; review the ja4-redaction evidence dimension for Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-path-32","testId":"ni-sitespeed-path-32","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Secret Redaction","description":"Validates absence of secrets, generic key examples, cookies, and raw tokens in public outputs for path normalization, route traversal safety, and deterministic path semantics. Evidence should include public artifact scan evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Secret Redaction appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the secret redaction evidence for sitespeed path and folder handling, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-path-32","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","paths","routes","crawlability","secret-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-path check:32","humanCommand":"Validate folder/path behavior against sitespeed pathToFolderTests concerns; review the secret-redaction evidence dimension for Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-path-33","testId":"ni-sitespeed-path-33","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Security Headers","description":"Validates security header coverage and hardened transport signals for path normalization, route traversal safety, and deterministic path semantics. Evidence should include HTTP header evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Security Headers appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the security headers evidence for sitespeed path and folder handling, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-path-33","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","paths","routes","crawlability","security-headers","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-path check:33","humanCommand":"Validate folder/path behavior against sitespeed pathToFolderTests concerns; review the security-headers evidence dimension for Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-path-34","testId":"ni-sitespeed-path-34","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Privacy Consent","description":"Validates privacy policy, consent, attribution, and data-use disclosure quality for path normalization, route traversal safety, and deterministic path semantics. Evidence should include public page and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Privacy Consent appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the privacy consent evidence for sitespeed path and folder handling, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-path-34","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","paths","routes","crawlability","privacy-consent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-path check:34","humanCommand":"Validate folder/path behavior against sitespeed pathToFolderTests concerns; review the privacy-consent evidence dimension for Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-path-35","testId":"ni-sitespeed-path-35","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Structured Data","description":"Validates JSON-LD and entity modeling for machine interpretation for path normalization, route traversal safety, and deterministic path semantics. Evidence should include schema block and parse evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Structured Data appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the structured data evidence for sitespeed path and folder handling, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-path-35","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","paths","routes","crawlability","structured-data","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-path check:35","humanCommand":"Validate folder/path behavior against sitespeed pathToFolderTests concerns; review the structured-data evidence dimension for Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-path-36","testId":"ni-sitespeed-path-36","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Social Preview","description":"Validates Open Graph and Twitter/X card readiness for public sharing for path normalization, route traversal safety, and deterministic path semantics. Evidence should include meta tag evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Social Preview appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the social preview evidence for sitespeed path and folder handling, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-path-36","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","paths","routes","crawlability","social-preview","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-path check:36","humanCommand":"Validate folder/path behavior against sitespeed pathToFolderTests concerns; review the social-preview evidence dimension for Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-path-37","testId":"ni-sitespeed-path-37","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: I18n Routing","description":"Validates locale route, hreflang, language declaration, and translation readiness for path normalization, route traversal safety, and deterministic path semantics. Evidence should include lang/hreflang and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: I18n Routing appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the i18n routing evidence for sitespeed path and folder handling, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-path-37","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","paths","routes","crawlability","i18n-routing","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-path check:37","humanCommand":"Validate folder/path behavior against sitespeed pathToFolderTests concerns; review the i18n-routing evidence dimension for Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-path-38","testId":"ni-sitespeed-path-38","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Readability","description":"Validates human readability, sectioning, sentence complexity, and comprehension support for path normalization, route traversal safety, and deterministic path semantics. Evidence should include extracted content evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Readability appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the readability evidence for sitespeed path and folder handling, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-path-38","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","paths","routes","crawlability","readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-path check:38","humanCommand":"Validate folder/path behavior against sitespeed pathToFolderTests concerns; review the readability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-path-39","testId":"ni-sitespeed-path-39","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Content Utility","description":"Validates non-placeholder content usefulness and domain-specific public value for path normalization, route traversal safety, and deterministic path semantics. Evidence should include content extraction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Content Utility appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the content utility evidence for sitespeed path and folder handling, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-path-39","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","paths","routes","crawlability","content-utility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-path check:39","humanCommand":"Validate folder/path behavior against sitespeed pathToFolderTests concerns; review the content-utility evidence dimension for Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-path-40","testId":"ni-sitespeed-path-40","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Recommendation Grounding","description":"Validates recommendation grounding in deterministic evidence instead of fabricated model output for path normalization, route traversal safety, and deterministic path semantics. Evidence should include issue and remediation evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Recommendation Grounding appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the recommendation grounding evidence for sitespeed path and folder handling, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-path-40","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","paths","routes","crawlability","recommendation-grounding","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-path check:40","humanCommand":"Validate folder/path behavior against sitespeed pathToFolderTests concerns; review the recommendation-grounding evidence dimension for Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-path-41","testId":"ni-sitespeed-path-41","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Evidence Quality","description":"Validates evidence completeness, public safety, and reproducibility for path normalization, route traversal safety, and deterministic path semantics. Evidence should include test output and artifact evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Evidence Quality appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the evidence quality evidence for sitespeed path and folder handling, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-path-41","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","paths","routes","crawlability","evidence-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-path check:41","humanCommand":"Validate folder/path behavior against sitespeed pathToFolderTests concerns; review the evidence-quality evidence dimension for Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-path-42","testId":"ni-sitespeed-path-42","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Threshold Policy","description":"Validates threshold clarity, pass/warn/fail semantics, and scoring transparency for path normalization, route traversal safety, and deterministic path semantics. Evidence should include threshold and result status evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Threshold Policy appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the threshold policy evidence for sitespeed path and folder handling, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-path-42","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","paths","routes","crawlability","threshold-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-path check:42","humanCommand":"Validate folder/path behavior against sitespeed pathToFolderTests concerns; review the threshold-policy evidence dimension for Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-path-43","testId":"ni-sitespeed-path-43","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Confidence","description":"Validates confidence scoring and degraded-input disclosure for path normalization, route traversal safety, and deterministic path semantics. Evidence should include source freshness and input availability evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Confidence appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the confidence evidence for sitespeed path and folder handling, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-path-43","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","paths","routes","crawlability","confidence","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-path check:43","humanCommand":"Validate folder/path behavior against sitespeed pathToFolderTests concerns; review the confidence evidence dimension for Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-path-44","testId":"ni-sitespeed-path-44","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Trend Readiness","description":"Validates historical comparability and timeline readiness for future reruns for path normalization, route traversal safety, and deterministic path semantics. Evidence should include analysis ID, timestamp, and persistence evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Trend Readiness appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the trend readiness evidence for sitespeed path and folder handling, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-path-44","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","paths","routes","crawlability","trend-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-path check:44","humanCommand":"Validate folder/path behavior against sitespeed pathToFolderTests concerns; review the trend-readiness evidence dimension for Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-path-45","testId":"ni-sitespeed-path-45","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Ranking Readiness","description":"Validates ranking input completeness and profile compatibility for path normalization, route traversal safety, and deterministic path semantics. Evidence should include score and profile evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Ranking Readiness appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ranking readiness evidence for sitespeed path and folder handling, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-path-45","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","paths","routes","crawlability","ranking-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-path check:45","humanCommand":"Validate folder/path behavior against sitespeed pathToFolderTests concerns; review the ranking-readiness evidence dimension for Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-path-46","testId":"ni-sitespeed-path-46","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Network Contribution","description":"Validates PlatPhorm network contribution through discovery, integrations, and standards compliance for path normalization, route traversal safety, and deterministic path semantics. Evidence should include network graph and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Network Contribution appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the network contribution evidence for sitespeed path and folder handling, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-path-46","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","paths","routes","crawlability","network-contribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-path check:46","humanCommand":"Validate folder/path behavior against sitespeed pathToFolderTests concerns; review the network-contribution evidence dimension for Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-path-47","testId":"ni-sitespeed-path-47","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Report Readiness","description":"Validates report/export categorization with public-safe evidence and protected boundaries for path normalization, route traversal safety, and deterministic path semantics. Evidence should include report section mapping evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Report Readiness appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the report readiness evidence for sitespeed path and folder handling, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-path-47","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","paths","routes","crawlability","report-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-path check:47","humanCommand":"Validate folder/path behavior against sitespeed pathToFolderTests concerns; review the report-readiness evidence dimension for Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-path-48","testId":"ni-sitespeed-path-48","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Operator Actionability","description":"Validates clear remediation, owner action, difficulty, and retest path for path normalization, route traversal safety, and deterministic path semantics. Evidence should include fix instructions and command evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Operator Actionability appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the operator actionability evidence for sitespeed path and folder handling, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-path-48","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","paths","routes","crawlability","operator-actionability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-path check:48","humanCommand":"Validate folder/path behavior against sitespeed pathToFolderTests concerns; review the operator-actionability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-path-49","testId":"ni-sitespeed-path-49","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Degraded State","description":"Validates honest degraded, unavailable, skipped, and not-applicable states for path normalization, route traversal safety, and deterministic path semantics. Evidence should include status and storage evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Degraded State appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the degraded state evidence for sitespeed path and folder handling, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-path-49","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","paths","routes","crawlability","degraded-state","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-path check:49","humanCommand":"Validate folder/path behavior against sitespeed pathToFolderTests concerns; review the degraded-state evidence dimension for Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-path-50","testId":"ni-sitespeed-path-50","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Reproducibility","description":"Validates stable CLI/API/human reproduction path and deterministic rerun instructions for path normalization, route traversal safety, and deterministic path semantics. Evidence should include commands and registry version evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling: Reproducibility appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the reproducibility evidence for sitespeed path and folder handling, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-path-50","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","paths","routes","crawlability","reproducibility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/sitemap.xml').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-path check:50","humanCommand":"Validate folder/path behavior against sitespeed pathToFolderTests concerns; review the reproducibility evidence dimension for Sitespeed Path and Folder Handling"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-reader-01","testId":"ni-sitespeed-reader-01","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Availability","description":"Validates public route availability and successful bounded fetch behavior for analysis output readability, parsing consistency, and reproducible interpretation. Evidence should include HTTP status, timeout, and redirect evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Availability appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the availability evidence for sitespeed reader output integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-reader-01","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","reader","output","consistency","availability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-reader check:1","humanCommand":"Check rendered output consistency using sitespeed readerTests-style expectations; review the availability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-reader-02","testId":"ni-sitespeed-reader-02","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Public Safety","description":"Validates public-safe access boundaries without exposing private or protected data for analysis output readability, parsing consistency, and reproducible interpretation. Evidence should include route policy and response-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Public Safety appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the public safety evidence for sitespeed reader output integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-reader-02","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","reader","output","consistency","public-safety","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-reader check:2","humanCommand":"Check rendered output consistency using sitespeed readerTests-style expectations; review the public-safety evidence dimension for Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-reader-03","testId":"ni-sitespeed-reader-03","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Canonical Url","description":"Validates canonical URL stability and normalized route identity for analysis output readability, parsing consistency, and reproducible interpretation. Evidence should include canonical tags, redirects, and normalized URL evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Canonical Url appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the canonical url evidence for sitespeed reader output integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-reader-03","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","reader","output","consistency","canonical-url","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-reader check:3","humanCommand":"Check rendered output consistency using sitespeed readerTests-style expectations; review the canonical-url evidence dimension for Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-reader-04","testId":"ni-sitespeed-reader-04","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Metadata Clarity","description":"Validates title, description, and page-specific metadata clarity for analysis output readability, parsing consistency, and reproducible interpretation. Evidence should include HTML metadata and extracted text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Metadata Clarity appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the metadata clarity evidence for sitespeed reader output integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-reader-04","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","reader","output","consistency","metadata-clarity","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-reader check:4","humanCommand":"Check rendered output consistency using sitespeed readerTests-style expectations; review the metadata-clarity evidence dimension for Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-reader-05","testId":"ni-sitespeed-reader-05","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Semantic Structure","description":"Validates semantic HTML structure for humans, agents, and assistive technology for analysis output readability, parsing consistency, and reproducible interpretation. Evidence should include heading, landmark, and element evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Semantic Structure appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the semantic structure evidence for sitespeed reader output integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-reader-05","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","reader","output","consistency","semantic-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-reader check:5","humanCommand":"Check rendered output consistency using sitespeed readerTests-style expectations; review the semantic-structure evidence dimension for Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-reader-06","testId":"ni-sitespeed-reader-06","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Machine Readability","description":"Validates machine-readable public content and predictable parsing surfaces for analysis output readability, parsing consistency, and reproducible interpretation. Evidence should include structured tags, JSON-LD, and document-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Machine Readability appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the machine readability evidence for sitespeed reader output integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-reader-06","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","reader","output","consistency","machine-readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-reader check:6","humanCommand":"Check rendered output consistency using sitespeed readerTests-style expectations; review the machine-readability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-reader-07","testId":"ni-sitespeed-reader-07","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Agent Discovery","description":"Validates agent discovery hints and AI-readable policy/documentation signals for analysis output readability, parsing consistency, and reproducible interpretation. Evidence should include llms, policy, MCP, OpenAPI, or schema evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Agent Discovery appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the agent discovery evidence for sitespeed reader output integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-reader-07","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","reader","output","consistency","agent-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-reader check:7","humanCommand":"Check rendered output consistency using sitespeed readerTests-style expectations; review the agent-discovery evidence dimension for Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-reader-08","testId":"ni-sitespeed-reader-08","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Crawler Discovery","description":"Validates crawler discovery paths through robots, sitemap, feeds, and canonical links for analysis output readability, parsing consistency, and reproducible interpretation. Evidence should include discovery artifact and link evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Crawler Discovery appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the crawler discovery evidence for sitespeed reader output integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-reader-08","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","reader","output","consistency","crawler-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-reader check:8","humanCommand":"Check rendered output consistency using sitespeed readerTests-style expectations; review the crawler-discovery evidence dimension for Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-reader-09","testId":"ni-sitespeed-reader-09","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Answerability","description":"Validates direct answer extraction and quotable explanatory content for analysis output readability, parsing consistency, and reproducible interpretation. Evidence should include question, summary, heading, and paragraph evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Answerability appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the answerability evidence for sitespeed reader output integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-reader-09","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","reader","output","consistency","answerability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-reader check:9","humanCommand":"Check rendered output consistency using sitespeed readerTests-style expectations; review the answerability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-reader-10","testId":"ni-sitespeed-reader-10","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Generative Context","description":"Validates GEO context quality for generative engines without inventing measured facts for analysis output readability, parsing consistency, and reproducible interpretation. Evidence should include entity, source, and instruction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Generative Context appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the generative context evidence for sitespeed reader output integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-reader-10","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","reader","output","consistency","generative-context","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-reader check:10","humanCommand":"Check rendered output consistency using sitespeed readerTests-style expectations; review the generative-context evidence dimension for Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-reader-11","testId":"ni-sitespeed-reader-11","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Search Intent","description":"Validates search intent alignment and snippet-friendly content structure for analysis output readability, parsing consistency, and reproducible interpretation. Evidence should include metadata, headings, and topical text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Search Intent appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the search intent evidence for sitespeed reader output integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-reader-11","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","reader","output","consistency","search-intent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-reader check:11","humanCommand":"Check rendered output consistency using sitespeed readerTests-style expectations; review the search-intent evidence dimension for Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-reader-12","testId":"ni-sitespeed-reader-12","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Accessibility Semantics","description":"Validates accessible names, relationships, landmarks, and keyboard-relevant structure for analysis output readability, parsing consistency, and reproducible interpretation. Evidence should include ARIA, labels, landmarks, and control evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Accessibility Semantics appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the accessibility semantics evidence for sitespeed reader output integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-reader-12","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","reader","output","consistency","accessibility-semantics","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-reader check:12","humanCommand":"Check rendered output consistency using sitespeed readerTests-style expectations; review the accessibility-semantics evidence dimension for Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-reader-13","testId":"ni-sitespeed-reader-13","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Mobile Readiness","description":"Validates mobile viewport, responsive content, and touch-friendly layout signals for analysis output readability, parsing consistency, and reproducible interpretation. Evidence should include viewport and responsive asset evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Mobile Readiness appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the mobile readiness evidence for sitespeed reader output integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-reader-13","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","reader","output","consistency","mobile-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-reader check:13","humanCommand":"Check rendered output consistency using sitespeed readerTests-style expectations; review the mobile-readiness evidence dimension for Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-reader-14","testId":"ni-sitespeed-reader-14","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Performance Budget","description":"Validates performance budget compliance using measured or bounded deterministic inputs for analysis output readability, parsing consistency, and reproducible interpretation. Evidence should include timing, byte, and Lighthouse-derived evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Performance Budget appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the performance budget evidence for sitespeed reader output integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-reader-14","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","reader","output","consistency","performance-budget","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-reader check:14","humanCommand":"Check rendered output consistency using sitespeed readerTests-style expectations; review the performance-budget evidence dimension for Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-reader-15","testId":"ni-sitespeed-reader-15","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Resource Efficiency","description":"Validates resource size, script/style count, and optimization opportunity signals for analysis output readability, parsing consistency, and reproducible interpretation. Evidence should include resource and markup evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Resource Efficiency appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the resource efficiency evidence for sitespeed reader output integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-reader-15","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","reader","output","consistency","resource-efficiency","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-reader check:15","humanCommand":"Check rendered output consistency using sitespeed readerTests-style expectations; review the resource-efficiency evidence dimension for Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-reader-16","testId":"ni-sitespeed-reader-16","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Cache Freshness","description":"Validates cache behavior, freshness hints, and stale-content risk for analysis output readability, parsing consistency, and reproducible interpretation. Evidence should include HTTP cache and timestamp evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Cache Freshness appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the cache freshness evidence for sitespeed reader output integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-reader-16","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","reader","output","consistency","cache-freshness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-reader check:16","humanCommand":"Check rendered output consistency using sitespeed readerTests-style expectations; review the cache-freshness evidence dimension for Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-reader-17","testId":"ni-sitespeed-reader-17","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Route Reliability","description":"Validates route reliability, redirect safety, and dead-link risk for analysis output readability, parsing consistency, and reproducible interpretation. Evidence should include status, redirect, and sitemap evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Route Reliability appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the route reliability evidence for sitespeed reader output integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-reader-17","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","reader","output","consistency","route-reliability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-reader check:17","humanCommand":"Check rendered output consistency using sitespeed readerTests-style expectations; review the route-reliability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-reader-18","testId":"ni-sitespeed-reader-18","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Feed Quality","description":"Validates RSS/Atom/feed usefulness, parseability, and freshness for analysis output readability, parsing consistency, and reproducible interpretation. Evidence should include feed XML and item evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Feed Quality appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the feed quality evidence for sitespeed reader output integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-reader-18","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","reader","output","consistency","feed-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-reader check:18","humanCommand":"Check rendered output consistency using sitespeed readerTests-style expectations; review the feed-quality evidence dimension for Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-reader-19","testId":"ni-sitespeed-reader-19","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Sitemap Quality","description":"Validates sitemap validity, public-safe URL coverage, and no-dead-link policy for analysis output readability, parsing consistency, and reproducible interpretation. Evidence should include sitemap XML and bounded link-check evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Sitemap Quality appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the sitemap quality evidence for sitespeed reader output integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-reader-19","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","reader","output","consistency","sitemap-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-reader check:19","humanCommand":"Check rendered output consistency using sitespeed readerTests-style expectations; review the sitemap-quality evidence dimension for Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-reader-20","testId":"ni-sitespeed-reader-20","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Robots Alignment","description":"Validates robots.txt alignment with public/protected policy and sitemap discovery for analysis output readability, parsing consistency, and reproducible interpretation. Evidence should include robots directives and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Robots Alignment appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the robots alignment evidence for sitespeed reader output integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-reader-20","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","reader","output","consistency","robots-alignment","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-reader check:20","humanCommand":"Check rendered output consistency using sitespeed readerTests-style expectations; review the robots-alignment evidence dimension for Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-reader-21","testId":"ni-sitespeed-reader-21","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Llms Structure","description":"Validates llms.txt structure, readability, endpoint coverage, and agent usefulness for analysis output readability, parsing consistency, and reproducible interpretation. Evidence should include plain-text section and line-length evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Llms Structure appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms structure evidence for sitespeed reader output integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-reader-21","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","reader","output","consistency","llms-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-reader check:21","humanCommand":"Check rendered output consistency using sitespeed readerTests-style expectations; review the llms-structure evidence dimension for Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-reader-22","testId":"ni-sitespeed-reader-22","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Llms Index Schema","description":"Validates llms-index JSON schema shape and count reconciliation for analysis output readability, parsing consistency, and reproducible interpretation. Evidence should include JSON keys, counts, and endpoint evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Llms Index Schema appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms index schema evidence for sitespeed reader output integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-reader-22","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","reader","output","consistency","llms-index-schema","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-reader check:22","humanCommand":"Check rendered output consistency using sitespeed readerTests-style expectations; review the llms-index-schema evidence dimension for Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-reader-23","testId":"ni-sitespeed-reader-23","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Humans Attribution","description":"Validates humans.txt attribution, maintainer, technology, and governance transparency for analysis output readability, parsing consistency, and reproducible interpretation. Evidence should include humans.txt section evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Humans Attribution appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the humans attribution evidence for sitespeed reader output integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-reader-23","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","reader","output","consistency","humans-attribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-reader check:23","humanCommand":"Check rendered output consistency using sitespeed readerTests-style expectations; review the humans-attribution evidence dimension for Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-reader-24","testId":"ni-sitespeed-reader-24","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Agent Policy","description":"Validates agent-policy JSON clarity for allowed, disallowed, and protected operations for analysis output readability, parsing consistency, and reproducible interpretation. Evidence should include well-known policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Agent Policy appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the agent policy evidence for sitespeed reader output integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-reader-24","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","reader","output","consistency","agent-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-reader check:24","humanCommand":"Check rendered output consistency using sitespeed readerTests-style expectations; review the agent-policy evidence dimension for Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-reader-25","testId":"ni-sitespeed-reader-25","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Ai Policy","description":"Validates AI policy clarity for training, search, answer use, caching, and attribution for analysis output readability, parsing consistency, and reproducible interpretation. Evidence should include well-known AI policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Ai Policy appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ai policy evidence for sitespeed reader output integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-reader-25","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","reader","output","consistency","ai-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-reader check:25","humanCommand":"Check rendered output consistency using sitespeed readerTests-style expectations; review the ai-policy evidence dimension for Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-reader-26","testId":"ni-sitespeed-reader-26","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Trust Policy","description":"Validates trust policy coverage for privacy, traceability, metadata, and protected actions for analysis output readability, parsing consistency, and reproducible interpretation. Evidence should include trust.json evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Trust Policy appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the trust policy evidence for sitespeed reader output integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-reader-26","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","reader","output","consistency","trust-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-reader check:26","humanCommand":"Check rendered output consistency using sitespeed readerTests-style expectations; review the trust-policy evidence dimension for Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-reader-27","testId":"ni-sitespeed-reader-27","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Openapi Contract","description":"Validates OpenAPI availability, server URL accuracy, schemas, and auth policy for analysis output readability, parsing consistency, and reproducible interpretation. Evidence should include OpenAPI text/JSON evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Openapi Contract appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the openapi contract evidence for sitespeed reader output integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-reader-27","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","reader","output","consistency","openapi-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-reader check:27","humanCommand":"Check rendered output consistency using sitespeed readerTests-style expectations; review the openapi-contract evidence dimension for Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-reader-28","testId":"ni-sitespeed-reader-28","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Mcp Contract","description":"Validates MCP JSON-RPC introspection, real tools, resources, and protected boundaries for analysis output readability, parsing consistency, and reproducible interpretation. Evidence should include MCP manifest and initialize evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Mcp Contract appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the mcp contract evidence for sitespeed reader output integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-reader-28","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","reader","output","consistency","mcp-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-reader check:28","humanCommand":"Check rendered output consistency using sitespeed readerTests-style expectations; review the mcp-contract evidence dimension for Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-reader-29","testId":"ni-sitespeed-reader-29","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Api Error Shape","description":"Validates API success/error response shape consistency for analysis output readability, parsing consistency, and reproducible interpretation. Evidence should include REST envelope evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Api Error Shape appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the api error shape evidence for sitespeed reader output integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-reader-29","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","reader","output","consistency","api-error-shape","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-reader check:29","humanCommand":"Check rendered output consistency using sitespeed readerTests-style expectations; review the api-error-shape evidence dimension for Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-reader-30","testId":"ni-sitespeed-reader-30","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Traceability","description":"Validates trace propagation, request IDs, and safe observability correlation for analysis output readability, parsing consistency, and reproducible interpretation. Evidence should include trace header and metadata evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Traceability appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the traceability evidence for sitespeed reader output integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-reader-30","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","reader","output","consistency","traceability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-reader check:30","humanCommand":"Check rendered output consistency using sitespeed readerTests-style expectations; review the traceability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-reader-31","testId":"ni-sitespeed-reader-31","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Ja4 Redaction","description":"Validates fingerprint-adjacent metadata redaction and non-public raw JA4 handling for analysis output readability, parsing consistency, and reproducible interpretation. Evidence should include metadata policy and redaction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Ja4 Redaction appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the ja4 redaction evidence for sitespeed reader output integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-reader-31","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","reader","output","consistency","ja4-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-reader check:31","humanCommand":"Check rendered output consistency using sitespeed readerTests-style expectations; review the ja4-redaction evidence dimension for Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-reader-32","testId":"ni-sitespeed-reader-32","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Secret Redaction","description":"Validates absence of secrets, generic key examples, cookies, and raw tokens in public outputs for analysis output readability, parsing consistency, and reproducible interpretation. Evidence should include public artifact scan evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Secret Redaction appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the secret redaction evidence for sitespeed reader output integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-reader-32","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","reader","output","consistency","secret-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-reader check:32","humanCommand":"Check rendered output consistency using sitespeed readerTests-style expectations; review the secret-redaction evidence dimension for Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-reader-33","testId":"ni-sitespeed-reader-33","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Security Headers","description":"Validates security header coverage and hardened transport signals for analysis output readability, parsing consistency, and reproducible interpretation. Evidence should include HTTP header evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Security Headers appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the security headers evidence for sitespeed reader output integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-reader-33","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","reader","output","consistency","security-headers","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-reader check:33","humanCommand":"Check rendered output consistency using sitespeed readerTests-style expectations; review the security-headers evidence dimension for Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-reader-34","testId":"ni-sitespeed-reader-34","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Privacy Consent","description":"Validates privacy policy, consent, attribution, and data-use disclosure quality for analysis output readability, parsing consistency, and reproducible interpretation. Evidence should include public page and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Privacy Consent appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the privacy consent evidence for sitespeed reader output integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-reader-34","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","reader","output","consistency","privacy-consent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-reader check:34","humanCommand":"Check rendered output consistency using sitespeed readerTests-style expectations; review the privacy-consent evidence dimension for Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-reader-35","testId":"ni-sitespeed-reader-35","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Structured Data","description":"Validates JSON-LD and entity modeling for machine interpretation for analysis output readability, parsing consistency, and reproducible interpretation. Evidence should include schema block and parse evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Structured Data appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the structured data evidence for sitespeed reader output integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-reader-35","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","reader","output","consistency","structured-data","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-reader check:35","humanCommand":"Check rendered output consistency using sitespeed readerTests-style expectations; review the structured-data evidence dimension for Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-reader-36","testId":"ni-sitespeed-reader-36","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Social Preview","description":"Validates Open Graph and Twitter/X card readiness for public sharing for analysis output readability, parsing consistency, and reproducible interpretation. Evidence should include meta tag evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Social Preview appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the social preview evidence for sitespeed reader output integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-reader-36","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","reader","output","consistency","social-preview","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-reader check:36","humanCommand":"Check rendered output consistency using sitespeed readerTests-style expectations; review the social-preview evidence dimension for Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-reader-37","testId":"ni-sitespeed-reader-37","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: I18n Routing","description":"Validates locale route, hreflang, language declaration, and translation readiness for analysis output readability, parsing consistency, and reproducible interpretation. Evidence should include lang/hreflang and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: I18n Routing appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the i18n routing evidence for sitespeed reader output integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-reader-37","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","reader","output","consistency","i18n-routing","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-reader check:37","humanCommand":"Check rendered output consistency using sitespeed readerTests-style expectations; review the i18n-routing evidence dimension for Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-reader-38","testId":"ni-sitespeed-reader-38","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Readability","description":"Validates human readability, sectioning, sentence complexity, and comprehension support for analysis output readability, parsing consistency, and reproducible interpretation. Evidence should include extracted content evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Readability appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the readability evidence for sitespeed reader output integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-reader-38","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","reader","output","consistency","readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-reader check:38","humanCommand":"Check rendered output consistency using sitespeed readerTests-style expectations; review the readability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-reader-39","testId":"ni-sitespeed-reader-39","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Content Utility","description":"Validates non-placeholder content usefulness and domain-specific public value for analysis output readability, parsing consistency, and reproducible interpretation. Evidence should include content extraction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Content Utility appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the content utility evidence for sitespeed reader output integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-reader-39","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","reader","output","consistency","content-utility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-reader check:39","humanCommand":"Check rendered output consistency using sitespeed readerTests-style expectations; review the content-utility evidence dimension for Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-reader-40","testId":"ni-sitespeed-reader-40","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Recommendation Grounding","description":"Validates recommendation grounding in deterministic evidence instead of fabricated model output for analysis output readability, parsing consistency, and reproducible interpretation. Evidence should include issue and remediation evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Recommendation Grounding appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the recommendation grounding evidence for sitespeed reader output integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-reader-40","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","reader","output","consistency","recommendation-grounding","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-reader check:40","humanCommand":"Check rendered output consistency using sitespeed readerTests-style expectations; review the recommendation-grounding evidence dimension for Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-reader-41","testId":"ni-sitespeed-reader-41","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Evidence Quality","description":"Validates evidence completeness, public safety, and reproducibility for analysis output readability, parsing consistency, and reproducible interpretation. Evidence should include test output and artifact evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Evidence Quality appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the evidence quality evidence for sitespeed reader output integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-reader-41","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","reader","output","consistency","evidence-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-reader check:41","humanCommand":"Check rendered output consistency using sitespeed readerTests-style expectations; review the evidence-quality evidence dimension for Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-reader-42","testId":"ni-sitespeed-reader-42","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Threshold Policy","description":"Validates threshold clarity, pass/warn/fail semantics, and scoring transparency for analysis output readability, parsing consistency, and reproducible interpretation. Evidence should include threshold and result status evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Threshold Policy appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the threshold policy evidence for sitespeed reader output integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-reader-42","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","reader","output","consistency","threshold-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-reader check:42","humanCommand":"Check rendered output consistency using sitespeed readerTests-style expectations; review the threshold-policy evidence dimension for Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-reader-43","testId":"ni-sitespeed-reader-43","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Confidence","description":"Validates confidence scoring and degraded-input disclosure for analysis output readability, parsing consistency, and reproducible interpretation. Evidence should include source freshness and input availability evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Confidence appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the confidence evidence for sitespeed reader output integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-reader-43","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","reader","output","consistency","confidence","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-reader check:43","humanCommand":"Check rendered output consistency using sitespeed readerTests-style expectations; review the confidence evidence dimension for Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-reader-44","testId":"ni-sitespeed-reader-44","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Trend Readiness","description":"Validates historical comparability and timeline readiness for future reruns for analysis output readability, parsing consistency, and reproducible interpretation. Evidence should include analysis ID, timestamp, and persistence evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Trend Readiness appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the trend readiness evidence for sitespeed reader output integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-reader-44","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","reader","output","consistency","trend-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-reader check:44","humanCommand":"Check rendered output consistency using sitespeed readerTests-style expectations; review the trend-readiness evidence dimension for Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-reader-45","testId":"ni-sitespeed-reader-45","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Ranking Readiness","description":"Validates ranking input completeness and profile compatibility for analysis output readability, parsing consistency, and reproducible interpretation. Evidence should include score and profile evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Ranking Readiness appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ranking readiness evidence for sitespeed reader output integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-reader-45","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","reader","output","consistency","ranking-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-reader check:45","humanCommand":"Check rendered output consistency using sitespeed readerTests-style expectations; review the ranking-readiness evidence dimension for Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-reader-46","testId":"ni-sitespeed-reader-46","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Network Contribution","description":"Validates PlatPhorm network contribution through discovery, integrations, and standards compliance for analysis output readability, parsing consistency, and reproducible interpretation. Evidence should include network graph and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Network Contribution appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the network contribution evidence for sitespeed reader output integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-reader-46","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","reader","output","consistency","network-contribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-reader check:46","humanCommand":"Check rendered output consistency using sitespeed readerTests-style expectations; review the network-contribution evidence dimension for Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-reader-47","testId":"ni-sitespeed-reader-47","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Report Readiness","description":"Validates report/export categorization with public-safe evidence and protected boundaries for analysis output readability, parsing consistency, and reproducible interpretation. Evidence should include report section mapping evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Report Readiness appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the report readiness evidence for sitespeed reader output integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-reader-47","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","reader","output","consistency","report-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-reader check:47","humanCommand":"Check rendered output consistency using sitespeed readerTests-style expectations; review the report-readiness evidence dimension for Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-reader-48","testId":"ni-sitespeed-reader-48","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Operator Actionability","description":"Validates clear remediation, owner action, difficulty, and retest path for analysis output readability, parsing consistency, and reproducible interpretation. Evidence should include fix instructions and command evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Operator Actionability appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the operator actionability evidence for sitespeed reader output integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-reader-48","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","reader","output","consistency","operator-actionability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-reader check:48","humanCommand":"Check rendered output consistency using sitespeed readerTests-style expectations; review the operator-actionability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-reader-49","testId":"ni-sitespeed-reader-49","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Degraded State","description":"Validates honest degraded, unavailable, skipped, and not-applicable states for analysis output readability, parsing consistency, and reproducible interpretation. Evidence should include status and storage evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Degraded State appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the degraded state evidence for sitespeed reader output integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-reader-49","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","reader","output","consistency","degraded-state","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-reader check:49","humanCommand":"Check rendered output consistency using sitespeed readerTests-style expectations; review the degraded-state evidence dimension for Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-reader-50","testId":"ni-sitespeed-reader-50","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Reproducibility","description":"Validates stable CLI/API/human reproduction path and deterministic rerun instructions for analysis output readability, parsing consistency, and reproducible interpretation. Evidence should include commands and registry version evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity: Reproducibility appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the reproducibility evidence for sitespeed reader output integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-reader-50","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","reader","output","consistency","reproducibility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-reader check:50","humanCommand":"Check rendered output consistency using sitespeed readerTests-style expectations; review the reproducibility evidence dimension for Sitespeed Reader Output Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-01","testId":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-01","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Availability","description":"Validates public route availability and successful bounded fetch behavior for result URL derivation, canonical links, and stable report addressing. Evidence should include HTTP status, timeout, and redirect evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Availability appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the availability evidence for sitespeed result url integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-result-url-01","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","result-url","reports","integrity","availability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example/export').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-result-url check:1","humanCommand":"Verify report URLs and exports against sitespeed resultUrlTests behavior; review the availability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Result URL Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-02","testId":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-02","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Public Safety","description":"Validates public-safe access boundaries without exposing private or protected data for result URL derivation, canonical links, and stable report addressing. Evidence should include route policy and response-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Public Safety appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the public safety evidence for sitespeed result url integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-result-url-02","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","result-url","reports","integrity","public-safety","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example/export').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-result-url check:2","humanCommand":"Verify report URLs and exports against sitespeed resultUrlTests behavior; review the public-safety evidence dimension for Sitespeed Result URL Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-03","testId":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-03","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Canonical Url","description":"Validates canonical URL stability and normalized route identity for result URL derivation, canonical links, and stable report addressing. Evidence should include canonical tags, redirects, and normalized URL evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Canonical Url appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the canonical url evidence for sitespeed result url integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-result-url-03","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","result-url","reports","integrity","canonical-url","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example/export').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-result-url check:3","humanCommand":"Verify report URLs and exports against sitespeed resultUrlTests behavior; review the canonical-url evidence dimension for Sitespeed Result URL Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-04","testId":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-04","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Metadata Clarity","description":"Validates title, description, and page-specific metadata clarity for result URL derivation, canonical links, and stable report addressing. Evidence should include HTML metadata and extracted text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Metadata Clarity appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the metadata clarity evidence for sitespeed result url integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-result-url-04","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","result-url","reports","integrity","metadata-clarity","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example/export').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-result-url check:4","humanCommand":"Verify report URLs and exports against sitespeed resultUrlTests behavior; review the metadata-clarity evidence dimension for Sitespeed Result URL Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-05","testId":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-05","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Semantic Structure","description":"Validates semantic HTML structure for humans, agents, and assistive technology for result URL derivation, canonical links, and stable report addressing. Evidence should include heading, landmark, and element evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Semantic Structure appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the semantic structure evidence for sitespeed result url integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-result-url-05","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","result-url","reports","integrity","semantic-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example/export').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-result-url check:5","humanCommand":"Verify report URLs and exports against sitespeed resultUrlTests behavior; review the semantic-structure evidence dimension for Sitespeed Result URL Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-06","testId":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-06","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Machine Readability","description":"Validates machine-readable public content and predictable parsing surfaces for result URL derivation, canonical links, and stable report addressing. Evidence should include structured tags, JSON-LD, and document-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Machine Readability appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the machine readability evidence for sitespeed result url integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-result-url-06","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","result-url","reports","integrity","machine-readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example/export').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-result-url check:6","humanCommand":"Verify report URLs and exports against sitespeed resultUrlTests behavior; review the machine-readability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Result URL Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-07","testId":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-07","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Agent Discovery","description":"Validates agent discovery hints and AI-readable policy/documentation signals for result URL derivation, canonical links, and stable report addressing. Evidence should include llms, policy, MCP, OpenAPI, or schema evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Agent Discovery appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the agent discovery evidence for sitespeed result url integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-result-url-07","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","result-url","reports","integrity","agent-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example/export').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-result-url check:7","humanCommand":"Verify report URLs and exports against sitespeed resultUrlTests behavior; review the agent-discovery evidence dimension for Sitespeed Result URL Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-08","testId":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-08","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Crawler Discovery","description":"Validates crawler discovery paths through robots, sitemap, feeds, and canonical links for result URL derivation, canonical links, and stable report addressing. Evidence should include discovery artifact and link evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Crawler Discovery appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the crawler discovery evidence for sitespeed result url integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-result-url-08","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","result-url","reports","integrity","crawler-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example/export').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-result-url check:8","humanCommand":"Verify report URLs and exports against sitespeed resultUrlTests behavior; review the crawler-discovery evidence dimension for Sitespeed Result URL Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-09","testId":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-09","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Answerability","description":"Validates direct answer extraction and quotable explanatory content for result URL derivation, canonical links, and stable report addressing. Evidence should include question, summary, heading, and paragraph evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Answerability appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the answerability evidence for sitespeed result url integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-result-url-09","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","result-url","reports","integrity","answerability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example/export').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-result-url check:9","humanCommand":"Verify report URLs and exports against sitespeed resultUrlTests behavior; review the answerability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Result URL Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-10","testId":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-10","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Generative Context","description":"Validates GEO context quality for generative engines without inventing measured facts for result URL derivation, canonical links, and stable report addressing. Evidence should include entity, source, and instruction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Generative Context appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the generative context evidence for sitespeed result url integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-result-url-10","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","result-url","reports","integrity","generative-context","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example/export').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-result-url check:10","humanCommand":"Verify report URLs and exports against sitespeed resultUrlTests behavior; review the generative-context evidence dimension for Sitespeed Result URL Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-11","testId":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-11","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Search Intent","description":"Validates search intent alignment and snippet-friendly content structure for result URL derivation, canonical links, and stable report addressing. Evidence should include metadata, headings, and topical text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Search Intent appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the search intent evidence for sitespeed result url integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-result-url-11","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","result-url","reports","integrity","search-intent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example/export').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-result-url check:11","humanCommand":"Verify report URLs and exports against sitespeed resultUrlTests behavior; review the search-intent evidence dimension for Sitespeed Result URL Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-12","testId":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-12","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Accessibility Semantics","description":"Validates accessible names, relationships, landmarks, and keyboard-relevant structure for result URL derivation, canonical links, and stable report addressing. Evidence should include ARIA, labels, landmarks, and control evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Accessibility Semantics appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the accessibility semantics evidence for sitespeed result url integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-result-url-12","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","result-url","reports","integrity","accessibility-semantics","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example/export').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-result-url check:12","humanCommand":"Verify report URLs and exports against sitespeed resultUrlTests behavior; review the accessibility-semantics evidence dimension for Sitespeed Result URL Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-13","testId":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-13","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Mobile Readiness","description":"Validates mobile viewport, responsive content, and touch-friendly layout signals for result URL derivation, canonical links, and stable report addressing. Evidence should include viewport and responsive asset evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Mobile Readiness appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the mobile readiness evidence for sitespeed result url integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-result-url-13","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","result-url","reports","integrity","mobile-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example/export').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-result-url check:13","humanCommand":"Verify report URLs and exports against sitespeed resultUrlTests behavior; review the mobile-readiness evidence dimension for Sitespeed Result URL Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-14","testId":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-14","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Performance Budget","description":"Validates performance budget compliance using measured or bounded deterministic inputs for result URL derivation, canonical links, and stable report addressing. Evidence should include timing, byte, and Lighthouse-derived evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Performance Budget appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the performance budget evidence for sitespeed result url integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-result-url-14","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","result-url","reports","integrity","performance-budget","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example/export').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-result-url check:14","humanCommand":"Verify report URLs and exports against sitespeed resultUrlTests behavior; review the performance-budget evidence dimension for Sitespeed Result URL Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-15","testId":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-15","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Resource Efficiency","description":"Validates resource size, script/style count, and optimization opportunity signals for result URL derivation, canonical links, and stable report addressing. Evidence should include resource and markup evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Resource Efficiency appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the resource efficiency evidence for sitespeed result url integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-result-url-15","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","result-url","reports","integrity","resource-efficiency","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example/export').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-result-url check:15","humanCommand":"Verify report URLs and exports against sitespeed resultUrlTests behavior; review the resource-efficiency evidence dimension for Sitespeed Result URL Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-16","testId":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-16","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Cache Freshness","description":"Validates cache behavior, freshness hints, and stale-content risk for result URL derivation, canonical links, and stable report addressing. Evidence should include HTTP cache and timestamp evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Cache Freshness appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the cache freshness evidence for sitespeed result url integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-result-url-16","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","result-url","reports","integrity","cache-freshness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example/export').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-result-url check:16","humanCommand":"Verify report URLs and exports against sitespeed resultUrlTests behavior; review the cache-freshness evidence dimension for Sitespeed Result URL Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-17","testId":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-17","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Route Reliability","description":"Validates route reliability, redirect safety, and dead-link risk for result URL derivation, canonical links, and stable report addressing. Evidence should include status, redirect, and sitemap evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Route Reliability appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the route reliability evidence for sitespeed result url integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-result-url-17","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","result-url","reports","integrity","route-reliability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example/export').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-result-url check:17","humanCommand":"Verify report URLs and exports against sitespeed resultUrlTests behavior; review the route-reliability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Result URL Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-18","testId":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-18","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Feed Quality","description":"Validates RSS/Atom/feed usefulness, parseability, and freshness for result URL derivation, canonical links, and stable report addressing. Evidence should include feed XML and item evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Feed Quality appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the feed quality evidence for sitespeed result url integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-result-url-18","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","result-url","reports","integrity","feed-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example/export').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-result-url check:18","humanCommand":"Verify report URLs and exports against sitespeed resultUrlTests behavior; review the feed-quality evidence dimension for Sitespeed Result URL Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-19","testId":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-19","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Sitemap Quality","description":"Validates sitemap validity, public-safe URL coverage, and no-dead-link policy for result URL derivation, canonical links, and stable report addressing. Evidence should include sitemap XML and bounded link-check evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Sitemap Quality appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the sitemap quality evidence for sitespeed result url integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-result-url-19","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","result-url","reports","integrity","sitemap-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example/export').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-result-url check:19","humanCommand":"Verify report URLs and exports against sitespeed resultUrlTests behavior; review the sitemap-quality evidence dimension for Sitespeed Result URL Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-20","testId":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-20","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Robots Alignment","description":"Validates robots.txt alignment with public/protected policy and sitemap discovery for result URL derivation, canonical links, and stable report addressing. Evidence should include robots directives and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Robots Alignment appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the robots alignment evidence for sitespeed result url integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-result-url-20","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","result-url","reports","integrity","robots-alignment","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example/export').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-result-url check:20","humanCommand":"Verify report URLs and exports against sitespeed resultUrlTests behavior; review the robots-alignment evidence dimension for Sitespeed Result URL Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-21","testId":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-21","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Llms Structure","description":"Validates llms.txt structure, readability, endpoint coverage, and agent usefulness for result URL derivation, canonical links, and stable report addressing. Evidence should include plain-text section and line-length evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Llms Structure appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms structure evidence for sitespeed result url integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-result-url-21","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","result-url","reports","integrity","llms-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example/export').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-result-url check:21","humanCommand":"Verify report URLs and exports against sitespeed resultUrlTests behavior; review the llms-structure evidence dimension for Sitespeed Result URL Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-22","testId":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-22","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Llms Index Schema","description":"Validates llms-index JSON schema shape and count reconciliation for result URL derivation, canonical links, and stable report addressing. Evidence should include JSON keys, counts, and endpoint evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Llms Index Schema appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms index schema evidence for sitespeed result url integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-result-url-22","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","result-url","reports","integrity","llms-index-schema","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example/export').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-result-url check:22","humanCommand":"Verify report URLs and exports against sitespeed resultUrlTests behavior; review the llms-index-schema evidence dimension for Sitespeed Result URL Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-23","testId":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-23","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Humans Attribution","description":"Validates humans.txt attribution, maintainer, technology, and governance transparency for result URL derivation, canonical links, and stable report addressing. Evidence should include humans.txt section evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Humans Attribution appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the humans attribution evidence for sitespeed result url integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-result-url-23","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","result-url","reports","integrity","humans-attribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example/export').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-result-url check:23","humanCommand":"Verify report URLs and exports against sitespeed resultUrlTests behavior; review the humans-attribution evidence dimension for Sitespeed Result URL Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-24","testId":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-24","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Agent Policy","description":"Validates agent-policy JSON clarity for allowed, disallowed, and protected operations for result URL derivation, canonical links, and stable report addressing. Evidence should include well-known policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Agent Policy appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the agent policy evidence for sitespeed result url integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-result-url-24","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","result-url","reports","integrity","agent-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example/export').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-result-url check:24","humanCommand":"Verify report URLs and exports against sitespeed resultUrlTests behavior; review the agent-policy evidence dimension for Sitespeed Result URL Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-25","testId":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-25","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Ai Policy","description":"Validates AI policy clarity for training, search, answer use, caching, and attribution for result URL derivation, canonical links, and stable report addressing. Evidence should include well-known AI policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Ai Policy appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ai policy evidence for sitespeed result url integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-result-url-25","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","result-url","reports","integrity","ai-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example/export').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-result-url check:25","humanCommand":"Verify report URLs and exports against sitespeed resultUrlTests behavior; review the ai-policy evidence dimension for Sitespeed Result URL Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-26","testId":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-26","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Trust Policy","description":"Validates trust policy coverage for privacy, traceability, metadata, and protected actions for result URL derivation, canonical links, and stable report addressing. Evidence should include trust.json evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Trust Policy appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the trust policy evidence for sitespeed result url integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-result-url-26","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","result-url","reports","integrity","trust-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example/export').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-result-url check:26","humanCommand":"Verify report URLs and exports against sitespeed resultUrlTests behavior; review the trust-policy evidence dimension for Sitespeed Result URL Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-27","testId":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-27","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Openapi Contract","description":"Validates OpenAPI availability, server URL accuracy, schemas, and auth policy for result URL derivation, canonical links, and stable report addressing. Evidence should include OpenAPI text/JSON evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Openapi Contract appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the openapi contract evidence for sitespeed result url integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-result-url-27","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","result-url","reports","integrity","openapi-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example/export').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-result-url check:27","humanCommand":"Verify report URLs and exports against sitespeed resultUrlTests behavior; review the openapi-contract evidence dimension for Sitespeed Result URL Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-28","testId":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-28","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Mcp Contract","description":"Validates MCP JSON-RPC introspection, real tools, resources, and protected boundaries for result URL derivation, canonical links, and stable report addressing. Evidence should include MCP manifest and initialize evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Mcp Contract appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the mcp contract evidence for sitespeed result url integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-result-url-28","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","result-url","reports","integrity","mcp-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example/export').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-result-url check:28","humanCommand":"Verify report URLs and exports against sitespeed resultUrlTests behavior; review the mcp-contract evidence dimension for Sitespeed Result URL Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-29","testId":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-29","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Api Error Shape","description":"Validates API success/error response shape consistency for result URL derivation, canonical links, and stable report addressing. Evidence should include REST envelope evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Api Error Shape appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the api error shape evidence for sitespeed result url integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-result-url-29","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","result-url","reports","integrity","api-error-shape","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example/export').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-result-url check:29","humanCommand":"Verify report URLs and exports against sitespeed resultUrlTests behavior; review the api-error-shape evidence dimension for Sitespeed Result URL Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-30","testId":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-30","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Traceability","description":"Validates trace propagation, request IDs, and safe observability correlation for result URL derivation, canonical links, and stable report addressing. Evidence should include trace header and metadata evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Traceability appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the traceability evidence for sitespeed result url integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-result-url-30","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","result-url","reports","integrity","traceability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example/export').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-result-url check:30","humanCommand":"Verify report URLs and exports against sitespeed resultUrlTests behavior; review the traceability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Result URL Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-31","testId":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-31","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Ja4 Redaction","description":"Validates fingerprint-adjacent metadata redaction and non-public raw JA4 handling for result URL derivation, canonical links, and stable report addressing. Evidence should include metadata policy and redaction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Ja4 Redaction appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the ja4 redaction evidence for sitespeed result url integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-result-url-31","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","result-url","reports","integrity","ja4-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example/export').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-result-url check:31","humanCommand":"Verify report URLs and exports against sitespeed resultUrlTests behavior; review the ja4-redaction evidence dimension for Sitespeed Result URL Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-32","testId":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-32","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Secret Redaction","description":"Validates absence of secrets, generic key examples, cookies, and raw tokens in public outputs for result URL derivation, canonical links, and stable report addressing. Evidence should include public artifact scan evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Secret Redaction appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the secret redaction evidence for sitespeed result url integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-result-url-32","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","result-url","reports","integrity","secret-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example/export').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-result-url check:32","humanCommand":"Verify report URLs and exports against sitespeed resultUrlTests behavior; review the secret-redaction evidence dimension for Sitespeed Result URL Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-33","testId":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-33","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Security Headers","description":"Validates security header coverage and hardened transport signals for result URL derivation, canonical links, and stable report addressing. Evidence should include HTTP header evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Security Headers appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the security headers evidence for sitespeed result url integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-result-url-33","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","result-url","reports","integrity","security-headers","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example/export').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-result-url check:33","humanCommand":"Verify report URLs and exports against sitespeed resultUrlTests behavior; review the security-headers evidence dimension for Sitespeed Result URL Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-34","testId":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-34","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Privacy Consent","description":"Validates privacy policy, consent, attribution, and data-use disclosure quality for result URL derivation, canonical links, and stable report addressing. Evidence should include public page and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Privacy Consent appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the privacy consent evidence for sitespeed result url integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-result-url-34","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","result-url","reports","integrity","privacy-consent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example/export').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-result-url check:34","humanCommand":"Verify report URLs and exports against sitespeed resultUrlTests behavior; review the privacy-consent evidence dimension for Sitespeed Result URL Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-35","testId":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-35","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Structured Data","description":"Validates JSON-LD and entity modeling for machine interpretation for result URL derivation, canonical links, and stable report addressing. Evidence should include schema block and parse evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Structured Data appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the structured data evidence for sitespeed result url integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-result-url-35","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","result-url","reports","integrity","structured-data","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example/export').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-result-url check:35","humanCommand":"Verify report URLs and exports against sitespeed resultUrlTests behavior; review the structured-data evidence dimension for Sitespeed Result URL Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-36","testId":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-36","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Social Preview","description":"Validates Open Graph and Twitter/X card readiness for public sharing for result URL derivation, canonical links, and stable report addressing. Evidence should include meta tag evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Social Preview appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the social preview evidence for sitespeed result url integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-result-url-36","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","result-url","reports","integrity","social-preview","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example/export').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-result-url check:36","humanCommand":"Verify report URLs and exports against sitespeed resultUrlTests behavior; review the social-preview evidence dimension for Sitespeed Result URL Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-37","testId":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-37","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: I18n Routing","description":"Validates locale route, hreflang, language declaration, and translation readiness for result URL derivation, canonical links, and stable report addressing. Evidence should include lang/hreflang and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: I18n Routing appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the i18n routing evidence for sitespeed result url integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-result-url-37","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","result-url","reports","integrity","i18n-routing","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example/export').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-result-url check:37","humanCommand":"Verify report URLs and exports against sitespeed resultUrlTests behavior; review the i18n-routing evidence dimension for Sitespeed Result URL Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-38","testId":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-38","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Readability","description":"Validates human readability, sectioning, sentence complexity, and comprehension support for result URL derivation, canonical links, and stable report addressing. Evidence should include extracted content evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Readability appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the readability evidence for sitespeed result url integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-result-url-38","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","result-url","reports","integrity","readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example/export').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-result-url check:38","humanCommand":"Verify report URLs and exports against sitespeed resultUrlTests behavior; review the readability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Result URL Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-39","testId":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-39","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Content Utility","description":"Validates non-placeholder content usefulness and domain-specific public value for result URL derivation, canonical links, and stable report addressing. Evidence should include content extraction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Content Utility appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the content utility evidence for sitespeed result url integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-result-url-39","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","result-url","reports","integrity","content-utility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example/export').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-result-url check:39","humanCommand":"Verify report URLs and exports against sitespeed resultUrlTests behavior; review the content-utility evidence dimension for Sitespeed Result URL Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-40","testId":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-40","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Recommendation Grounding","description":"Validates recommendation grounding in deterministic evidence instead of fabricated model output for result URL derivation, canonical links, and stable report addressing. Evidence should include issue and remediation evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Recommendation Grounding appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the recommendation grounding evidence for sitespeed result url integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-result-url-40","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","result-url","reports","integrity","recommendation-grounding","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example/export').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-result-url check:40","humanCommand":"Verify report URLs and exports against sitespeed resultUrlTests behavior; review the recommendation-grounding evidence dimension for Sitespeed Result URL Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-41","testId":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-41","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Evidence Quality","description":"Validates evidence completeness, public safety, and reproducibility for result URL derivation, canonical links, and stable report addressing. Evidence should include test output and artifact evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Evidence Quality appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the evidence quality evidence for sitespeed result url integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-result-url-41","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","result-url","reports","integrity","evidence-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example/export').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-result-url check:41","humanCommand":"Verify report URLs and exports against sitespeed resultUrlTests behavior; review the evidence-quality evidence dimension for Sitespeed Result URL Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-42","testId":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-42","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Threshold Policy","description":"Validates threshold clarity, pass/warn/fail semantics, and scoring transparency for result URL derivation, canonical links, and stable report addressing. Evidence should include threshold and result status evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Threshold Policy appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the threshold policy evidence for sitespeed result url integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-result-url-42","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","result-url","reports","integrity","threshold-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example/export').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-result-url check:42","humanCommand":"Verify report URLs and exports against sitespeed resultUrlTests behavior; review the threshold-policy evidence dimension for Sitespeed Result URL Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-43","testId":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-43","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Confidence","description":"Validates confidence scoring and degraded-input disclosure for result URL derivation, canonical links, and stable report addressing. Evidence should include source freshness and input availability evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Confidence appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the confidence evidence for sitespeed result url integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-result-url-43","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","result-url","reports","integrity","confidence","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example/export').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-result-url check:43","humanCommand":"Verify report URLs and exports against sitespeed resultUrlTests behavior; review the confidence evidence dimension for Sitespeed Result URL Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-44","testId":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-44","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Trend Readiness","description":"Validates historical comparability and timeline readiness for future reruns for result URL derivation, canonical links, and stable report addressing. Evidence should include analysis ID, timestamp, and persistence evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Trend Readiness appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the trend readiness evidence for sitespeed result url integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-result-url-44","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","result-url","reports","integrity","trend-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example/export').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-result-url check:44","humanCommand":"Verify report URLs and exports against sitespeed resultUrlTests behavior; review the trend-readiness evidence dimension for Sitespeed Result URL Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-45","testId":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-45","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Ranking Readiness","description":"Validates ranking input completeness and profile compatibility for result URL derivation, canonical links, and stable report addressing. Evidence should include score and profile evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Ranking Readiness appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ranking readiness evidence for sitespeed result url integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-result-url-45","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","result-url","reports","integrity","ranking-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example/export').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-result-url check:45","humanCommand":"Verify report URLs and exports against sitespeed resultUrlTests behavior; review the ranking-readiness evidence dimension for Sitespeed Result URL Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-46","testId":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-46","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Network Contribution","description":"Validates PlatPhorm network contribution through discovery, integrations, and standards compliance for result URL derivation, canonical links, and stable report addressing. Evidence should include network graph and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Network Contribution appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the network contribution evidence for sitespeed result url integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-result-url-46","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","result-url","reports","integrity","network-contribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example/export').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-result-url check:46","humanCommand":"Verify report URLs and exports against sitespeed resultUrlTests behavior; review the network-contribution evidence dimension for Sitespeed Result URL Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-47","testId":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-47","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Report Readiness","description":"Validates report/export categorization with public-safe evidence and protected boundaries for result URL derivation, canonical links, and stable report addressing. Evidence should include report section mapping evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Report Readiness appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the report readiness evidence for sitespeed result url integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-result-url-47","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","result-url","reports","integrity","report-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example/export').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-result-url check:47","humanCommand":"Verify report URLs and exports against sitespeed resultUrlTests behavior; review the report-readiness evidence dimension for Sitespeed Result URL Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-48","testId":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-48","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Operator Actionability","description":"Validates clear remediation, owner action, difficulty, and retest path for result URL derivation, canonical links, and stable report addressing. Evidence should include fix instructions and command evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Operator Actionability appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the operator actionability evidence for sitespeed result url integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-result-url-48","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","result-url","reports","integrity","operator-actionability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example/export').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-result-url check:48","humanCommand":"Verify report URLs and exports against sitespeed resultUrlTests behavior; review the operator-actionability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Result URL Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-49","testId":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-49","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Degraded State","description":"Validates honest degraded, unavailable, skipped, and not-applicable states for result URL derivation, canonical links, and stable report addressing. Evidence should include status and storage evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Degraded State appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the degraded state evidence for sitespeed result url integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-result-url-49","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","result-url","reports","integrity","degraded-state","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example/export').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-result-url check:49","humanCommand":"Verify report URLs and exports against sitespeed resultUrlTests behavior; review the degraded-state evidence dimension for Sitespeed Result URL Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-50","testId":"ni-sitespeed-result-url-50","suiteId":"seo","suiteName":"SEO","phase2Dimensions":["seo","aeo","geo","discovery","content-utility"],"name":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Reproducibility","description":"Validates stable CLI/API/human reproduction path and deterministic rerun instructions for result URL derivation, canonical links, and stable report addressing. Evidence should include commands and registry version evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"seo-aeo-geo-discovery","reportSectionName":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery","reportingCategory":"SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery / SEO","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Result URL Integrity: Reproducibility appears in the SEO, AEO, GEO, and Public Discovery report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the reproducibility evidence for sitespeed result url integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-result-url-50","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","result-url","reports","integrity","reproducibility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/results/example/export').then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-result-url check:50","humanCommand":"Verify report URLs and exports against sitespeed resultUrlTests behavior; review the reproducibility evidence dimension for Sitespeed Result URL Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-01","testId":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-01","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Availability","description":"Validates public route availability and successful bounded fetch behavior for non-cli execution parity, defaults, and reproducible invocation behavior. Evidence should include HTTP status, timeout, and redirect evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Availability appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the availability evidence for sitespeed programmatic run integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-01","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","api-run","execution","deterministic","availability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/analyze',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({url:'https://example.com',includeComprehensiveTests:true})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-run-no-cli check:1","humanCommand":"Validate API-first execution flow parity with sitespeed runWithoutCli patterns; review the availability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-02","testId":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-02","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Public Safety","description":"Validates public-safe access boundaries without exposing private or protected data for non-cli execution parity, defaults, and reproducible invocation behavior. Evidence should include route policy and response-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Public Safety appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the public safety evidence for sitespeed programmatic run integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-02","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","api-run","execution","deterministic","public-safety","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/analyze',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({url:'https://example.com',includeComprehensiveTests:true})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-run-no-cli check:2","humanCommand":"Validate API-first execution flow parity with sitespeed runWithoutCli patterns; review the public-safety evidence dimension for Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-03","testId":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-03","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Canonical Url","description":"Validates canonical URL stability and normalized route identity for non-cli execution parity, defaults, and reproducible invocation behavior. Evidence should include canonical tags, redirects, and normalized URL evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Canonical Url appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the canonical url evidence for sitespeed programmatic run integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-03","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","api-run","execution","deterministic","canonical-url","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/analyze',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({url:'https://example.com',includeComprehensiveTests:true})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-run-no-cli check:3","humanCommand":"Validate API-first execution flow parity with sitespeed runWithoutCli patterns; review the canonical-url evidence dimension for Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-04","testId":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-04","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Metadata Clarity","description":"Validates title, description, and page-specific metadata clarity for non-cli execution parity, defaults, and reproducible invocation behavior. Evidence should include HTML metadata and extracted text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Metadata Clarity appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the metadata clarity evidence for sitespeed programmatic run integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-04","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","api-run","execution","deterministic","metadata-clarity","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/analyze',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({url:'https://example.com',includeComprehensiveTests:true})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-run-no-cli check:4","humanCommand":"Validate API-first execution flow parity with sitespeed runWithoutCli patterns; review the metadata-clarity evidence dimension for Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-05","testId":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-05","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Semantic Structure","description":"Validates semantic HTML structure for humans, agents, and assistive technology for non-cli execution parity, defaults, and reproducible invocation behavior. Evidence should include heading, landmark, and element evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Semantic Structure appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the semantic structure evidence for sitespeed programmatic run integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-05","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","api-run","execution","deterministic","semantic-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/analyze',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({url:'https://example.com',includeComprehensiveTests:true})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-run-no-cli check:5","humanCommand":"Validate API-first execution flow parity with sitespeed runWithoutCli patterns; review the semantic-structure evidence dimension for Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-06","testId":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-06","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Machine Readability","description":"Validates machine-readable public content and predictable parsing surfaces for non-cli execution parity, defaults, and reproducible invocation behavior. Evidence should include structured tags, JSON-LD, and document-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Machine Readability appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the machine readability evidence for sitespeed programmatic run integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-06","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","api-run","execution","deterministic","machine-readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/analyze',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({url:'https://example.com',includeComprehensiveTests:true})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-run-no-cli check:6","humanCommand":"Validate API-first execution flow parity with sitespeed runWithoutCli patterns; review the machine-readability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-07","testId":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-07","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Agent Discovery","description":"Validates agent discovery hints and AI-readable policy/documentation signals for non-cli execution parity, defaults, and reproducible invocation behavior. Evidence should include llms, policy, MCP, OpenAPI, or schema evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Agent Discovery appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the agent discovery evidence for sitespeed programmatic run integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-07","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","api-run","execution","deterministic","agent-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/analyze',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({url:'https://example.com',includeComprehensiveTests:true})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-run-no-cli check:7","humanCommand":"Validate API-first execution flow parity with sitespeed runWithoutCli patterns; review the agent-discovery evidence dimension for Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-08","testId":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-08","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Crawler Discovery","description":"Validates crawler discovery paths through robots, sitemap, feeds, and canonical links for non-cli execution parity, defaults, and reproducible invocation behavior. Evidence should include discovery artifact and link evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Crawler Discovery appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the crawler discovery evidence for sitespeed programmatic run integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-08","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","api-run","execution","deterministic","crawler-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/analyze',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({url:'https://example.com',includeComprehensiveTests:true})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-run-no-cli check:8","humanCommand":"Validate API-first execution flow parity with sitespeed runWithoutCli patterns; review the crawler-discovery evidence dimension for Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-09","testId":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-09","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Answerability","description":"Validates direct answer extraction and quotable explanatory content for non-cli execution parity, defaults, and reproducible invocation behavior. Evidence should include question, summary, heading, and paragraph evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Answerability appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the answerability evidence for sitespeed programmatic run integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-09","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","api-run","execution","deterministic","answerability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/analyze',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({url:'https://example.com',includeComprehensiveTests:true})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-run-no-cli check:9","humanCommand":"Validate API-first execution flow parity with sitespeed runWithoutCli patterns; review the answerability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-10","testId":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-10","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Generative Context","description":"Validates GEO context quality for generative engines without inventing measured facts for non-cli execution parity, defaults, and reproducible invocation behavior. Evidence should include entity, source, and instruction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Generative Context appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the generative context evidence for sitespeed programmatic run integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-10","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","api-run","execution","deterministic","generative-context","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/analyze',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({url:'https://example.com',includeComprehensiveTests:true})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-run-no-cli check:10","humanCommand":"Validate API-first execution flow parity with sitespeed runWithoutCli patterns; review the generative-context evidence dimension for Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-11","testId":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-11","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Search Intent","description":"Validates search intent alignment and snippet-friendly content structure for non-cli execution parity, defaults, and reproducible invocation behavior. Evidence should include metadata, headings, and topical text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Search Intent appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the search intent evidence for sitespeed programmatic run integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-11","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","api-run","execution","deterministic","search-intent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/analyze',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({url:'https://example.com',includeComprehensiveTests:true})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-run-no-cli check:11","humanCommand":"Validate API-first execution flow parity with sitespeed runWithoutCli patterns; review the search-intent evidence dimension for Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-12","testId":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-12","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Accessibility Semantics","description":"Validates accessible names, relationships, landmarks, and keyboard-relevant structure for non-cli execution parity, defaults, and reproducible invocation behavior. Evidence should include ARIA, labels, landmarks, and control evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Accessibility Semantics appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the accessibility semantics evidence for sitespeed programmatic run integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-12","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","api-run","execution","deterministic","accessibility-semantics","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/analyze',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({url:'https://example.com',includeComprehensiveTests:true})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-run-no-cli check:12","humanCommand":"Validate API-first execution flow parity with sitespeed runWithoutCli patterns; review the accessibility-semantics evidence dimension for Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-13","testId":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-13","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Mobile Readiness","description":"Validates mobile viewport, responsive content, and touch-friendly layout signals for non-cli execution parity, defaults, and reproducible invocation behavior. Evidence should include viewport and responsive asset evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Mobile Readiness appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the mobile readiness evidence for sitespeed programmatic run integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-13","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","api-run","execution","deterministic","mobile-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/analyze',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({url:'https://example.com',includeComprehensiveTests:true})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-run-no-cli check:13","humanCommand":"Validate API-first execution flow parity with sitespeed runWithoutCli patterns; review the mobile-readiness evidence dimension for Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-14","testId":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-14","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Performance Budget","description":"Validates performance budget compliance using measured or bounded deterministic inputs for non-cli execution parity, defaults, and reproducible invocation behavior. Evidence should include timing, byte, and Lighthouse-derived evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Performance Budget appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the performance budget evidence for sitespeed programmatic run integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-14","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","api-run","execution","deterministic","performance-budget","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/analyze',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({url:'https://example.com',includeComprehensiveTests:true})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-run-no-cli check:14","humanCommand":"Validate API-first execution flow parity with sitespeed runWithoutCli patterns; review the performance-budget evidence dimension for Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-15","testId":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-15","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Resource Efficiency","description":"Validates resource size, script/style count, and optimization opportunity signals for non-cli execution parity, defaults, and reproducible invocation behavior. Evidence should include resource and markup evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Resource Efficiency appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the resource efficiency evidence for sitespeed programmatic run integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-15","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","api-run","execution","deterministic","resource-efficiency","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/analyze',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({url:'https://example.com',includeComprehensiveTests:true})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-run-no-cli check:15","humanCommand":"Validate API-first execution flow parity with sitespeed runWithoutCli patterns; review the resource-efficiency evidence dimension for Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-16","testId":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-16","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Cache Freshness","description":"Validates cache behavior, freshness hints, and stale-content risk for non-cli execution parity, defaults, and reproducible invocation behavior. Evidence should include HTTP cache and timestamp evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Cache Freshness appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the cache freshness evidence for sitespeed programmatic run integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-16","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","api-run","execution","deterministic","cache-freshness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/analyze',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({url:'https://example.com',includeComprehensiveTests:true})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-run-no-cli check:16","humanCommand":"Validate API-first execution flow parity with sitespeed runWithoutCli patterns; review the cache-freshness evidence dimension for Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-17","testId":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-17","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Route Reliability","description":"Validates route reliability, redirect safety, and dead-link risk for non-cli execution parity, defaults, and reproducible invocation behavior. Evidence should include status, redirect, and sitemap evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Route Reliability appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the route reliability evidence for sitespeed programmatic run integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-17","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","api-run","execution","deterministic","route-reliability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/analyze',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({url:'https://example.com',includeComprehensiveTests:true})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-run-no-cli check:17","humanCommand":"Validate API-first execution flow parity with sitespeed runWithoutCli patterns; review the route-reliability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-18","testId":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-18","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Feed Quality","description":"Validates RSS/Atom/feed usefulness, parseability, and freshness for non-cli execution parity, defaults, and reproducible invocation behavior. Evidence should include feed XML and item evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Feed Quality appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the feed quality evidence for sitespeed programmatic run integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-18","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","api-run","execution","deterministic","feed-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/analyze',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({url:'https://example.com',includeComprehensiveTests:true})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-run-no-cli check:18","humanCommand":"Validate API-first execution flow parity with sitespeed runWithoutCli patterns; review the feed-quality evidence dimension for Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-19","testId":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-19","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Sitemap Quality","description":"Validates sitemap validity, public-safe URL coverage, and no-dead-link policy for non-cli execution parity, defaults, and reproducible invocation behavior. Evidence should include sitemap XML and bounded link-check evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Sitemap Quality appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the sitemap quality evidence for sitespeed programmatic run integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-19","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","api-run","execution","deterministic","sitemap-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/analyze',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({url:'https://example.com',includeComprehensiveTests:true})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-run-no-cli check:19","humanCommand":"Validate API-first execution flow parity with sitespeed runWithoutCli patterns; review the sitemap-quality evidence dimension for Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-20","testId":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-20","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Robots Alignment","description":"Validates robots.txt alignment with public/protected policy and sitemap discovery for non-cli execution parity, defaults, and reproducible invocation behavior. Evidence should include robots directives and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Robots Alignment appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the robots alignment evidence for sitespeed programmatic run integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-20","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","api-run","execution","deterministic","robots-alignment","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/analyze',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({url:'https://example.com',includeComprehensiveTests:true})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-run-no-cli check:20","humanCommand":"Validate API-first execution flow parity with sitespeed runWithoutCli patterns; review the robots-alignment evidence dimension for Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-21","testId":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-21","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Llms Structure","description":"Validates llms.txt structure, readability, endpoint coverage, and agent usefulness for non-cli execution parity, defaults, and reproducible invocation behavior. Evidence should include plain-text section and line-length evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Llms Structure appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms structure evidence for sitespeed programmatic run integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-21","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","api-run","execution","deterministic","llms-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/analyze',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({url:'https://example.com',includeComprehensiveTests:true})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-run-no-cli check:21","humanCommand":"Validate API-first execution flow parity with sitespeed runWithoutCli patterns; review the llms-structure evidence dimension for Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-22","testId":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-22","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Llms Index Schema","description":"Validates llms-index JSON schema shape and count reconciliation for non-cli execution parity, defaults, and reproducible invocation behavior. Evidence should include JSON keys, counts, and endpoint evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Llms Index Schema appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms index schema evidence for sitespeed programmatic run integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-22","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","api-run","execution","deterministic","llms-index-schema","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/analyze',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({url:'https://example.com',includeComprehensiveTests:true})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-run-no-cli check:22","humanCommand":"Validate API-first execution flow parity with sitespeed runWithoutCli patterns; review the llms-index-schema evidence dimension for Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-23","testId":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-23","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Humans Attribution","description":"Validates humans.txt attribution, maintainer, technology, and governance transparency for non-cli execution parity, defaults, and reproducible invocation behavior. Evidence should include humans.txt section evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Humans Attribution appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the humans attribution evidence for sitespeed programmatic run integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-23","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","api-run","execution","deterministic","humans-attribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/analyze',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({url:'https://example.com',includeComprehensiveTests:true})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-run-no-cli check:23","humanCommand":"Validate API-first execution flow parity with sitespeed runWithoutCli patterns; review the humans-attribution evidence dimension for Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-24","testId":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-24","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Agent Policy","description":"Validates agent-policy JSON clarity for allowed, disallowed, and protected operations for non-cli execution parity, defaults, and reproducible invocation behavior. Evidence should include well-known policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Agent Policy appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the agent policy evidence for sitespeed programmatic run integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-24","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","api-run","execution","deterministic","agent-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/analyze',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({url:'https://example.com',includeComprehensiveTests:true})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-run-no-cli check:24","humanCommand":"Validate API-first execution flow parity with sitespeed runWithoutCli patterns; review the agent-policy evidence dimension for Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-25","testId":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-25","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Ai Policy","description":"Validates AI policy clarity for training, search, answer use, caching, and attribution for non-cli execution parity, defaults, and reproducible invocation behavior. Evidence should include well-known AI policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Ai Policy appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ai policy evidence for sitespeed programmatic run integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-25","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","api-run","execution","deterministic","ai-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/analyze',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({url:'https://example.com',includeComprehensiveTests:true})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-run-no-cli check:25","humanCommand":"Validate API-first execution flow parity with sitespeed runWithoutCli patterns; review the ai-policy evidence dimension for Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-26","testId":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-26","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Trust Policy","description":"Validates trust policy coverage for privacy, traceability, metadata, and protected actions for non-cli execution parity, defaults, and reproducible invocation behavior. Evidence should include trust.json evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Trust Policy appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the trust policy evidence for sitespeed programmatic run integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-26","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","api-run","execution","deterministic","trust-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/analyze',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({url:'https://example.com',includeComprehensiveTests:true})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-run-no-cli check:26","humanCommand":"Validate API-first execution flow parity with sitespeed runWithoutCli patterns; review the trust-policy evidence dimension for Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-27","testId":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-27","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Openapi Contract","description":"Validates OpenAPI availability, server URL accuracy, schemas, and auth policy for non-cli execution parity, defaults, and reproducible invocation behavior. Evidence should include OpenAPI text/JSON evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Openapi Contract appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the openapi contract evidence for sitespeed programmatic run integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-27","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","api-run","execution","deterministic","openapi-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/analyze',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({url:'https://example.com',includeComprehensiveTests:true})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-run-no-cli check:27","humanCommand":"Validate API-first execution flow parity with sitespeed runWithoutCli patterns; review the openapi-contract evidence dimension for Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-28","testId":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-28","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Mcp Contract","description":"Validates MCP JSON-RPC introspection, real tools, resources, and protected boundaries for non-cli execution parity, defaults, and reproducible invocation behavior. Evidence should include MCP manifest and initialize evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Mcp Contract appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the mcp contract evidence for sitespeed programmatic run integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-28","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","api-run","execution","deterministic","mcp-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/analyze',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({url:'https://example.com',includeComprehensiveTests:true})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-run-no-cli check:28","humanCommand":"Validate API-first execution flow parity with sitespeed runWithoutCli patterns; review the mcp-contract evidence dimension for Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-29","testId":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-29","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Api Error Shape","description":"Validates API success/error response shape consistency for non-cli execution parity, defaults, and reproducible invocation behavior. Evidence should include REST envelope evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Api Error Shape appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the api error shape evidence for sitespeed programmatic run integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-29","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","api-run","execution","deterministic","api-error-shape","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/analyze',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({url:'https://example.com',includeComprehensiveTests:true})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-run-no-cli check:29","humanCommand":"Validate API-first execution flow parity with sitespeed runWithoutCli patterns; review the api-error-shape evidence dimension for Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-30","testId":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-30","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Traceability","description":"Validates trace propagation, request IDs, and safe observability correlation for non-cli execution parity, defaults, and reproducible invocation behavior. Evidence should include trace header and metadata evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Traceability appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the traceability evidence for sitespeed programmatic run integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-30","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","api-run","execution","deterministic","traceability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/analyze',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({url:'https://example.com',includeComprehensiveTests:true})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-run-no-cli check:30","humanCommand":"Validate API-first execution flow parity with sitespeed runWithoutCli patterns; review the traceability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-31","testId":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-31","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Ja4 Redaction","description":"Validates fingerprint-adjacent metadata redaction and non-public raw JA4 handling for non-cli execution parity, defaults, and reproducible invocation behavior. Evidence should include metadata policy and redaction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Ja4 Redaction appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the ja4 redaction evidence for sitespeed programmatic run integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-31","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","api-run","execution","deterministic","ja4-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/analyze',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({url:'https://example.com',includeComprehensiveTests:true})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-run-no-cli check:31","humanCommand":"Validate API-first execution flow parity with sitespeed runWithoutCli patterns; review the ja4-redaction evidence dimension for Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-32","testId":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-32","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Secret Redaction","description":"Validates absence of secrets, generic key examples, cookies, and raw tokens in public outputs for non-cli execution parity, defaults, and reproducible invocation behavior. Evidence should include public artifact scan evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Secret Redaction appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the secret redaction evidence for sitespeed programmatic run integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-32","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","api-run","execution","deterministic","secret-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/analyze',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({url:'https://example.com',includeComprehensiveTests:true})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-run-no-cli check:32","humanCommand":"Validate API-first execution flow parity with sitespeed runWithoutCli patterns; review the secret-redaction evidence dimension for Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-33","testId":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-33","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Security Headers","description":"Validates security header coverage and hardened transport signals for non-cli execution parity, defaults, and reproducible invocation behavior. Evidence should include HTTP header evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Security Headers appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the security headers evidence for sitespeed programmatic run integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-33","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","api-run","execution","deterministic","security-headers","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/analyze',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({url:'https://example.com',includeComprehensiveTests:true})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-run-no-cli check:33","humanCommand":"Validate API-first execution flow parity with sitespeed runWithoutCli patterns; review the security-headers evidence dimension for Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-34","testId":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-34","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Privacy Consent","description":"Validates privacy policy, consent, attribution, and data-use disclosure quality for non-cli execution parity, defaults, and reproducible invocation behavior. Evidence should include public page and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Privacy Consent appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the privacy consent evidence for sitespeed programmatic run integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-34","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","api-run","execution","deterministic","privacy-consent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/analyze',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({url:'https://example.com',includeComprehensiveTests:true})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-run-no-cli check:34","humanCommand":"Validate API-first execution flow parity with sitespeed runWithoutCli patterns; review the privacy-consent evidence dimension for Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-35","testId":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-35","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Structured Data","description":"Validates JSON-LD and entity modeling for machine interpretation for non-cli execution parity, defaults, and reproducible invocation behavior. Evidence should include schema block and parse evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Structured Data appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the structured data evidence for sitespeed programmatic run integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-35","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","api-run","execution","deterministic","structured-data","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/analyze',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({url:'https://example.com',includeComprehensiveTests:true})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-run-no-cli check:35","humanCommand":"Validate API-first execution flow parity with sitespeed runWithoutCli patterns; review the structured-data evidence dimension for Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-36","testId":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-36","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Social Preview","description":"Validates Open Graph and Twitter/X card readiness for public sharing for non-cli execution parity, defaults, and reproducible invocation behavior. Evidence should include meta tag evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Social Preview appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the social preview evidence for sitespeed programmatic run integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-36","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","api-run","execution","deterministic","social-preview","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/analyze',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({url:'https://example.com',includeComprehensiveTests:true})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-run-no-cli check:36","humanCommand":"Validate API-first execution flow parity with sitespeed runWithoutCli patterns; review the social-preview evidence dimension for Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-37","testId":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-37","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: I18n Routing","description":"Validates locale route, hreflang, language declaration, and translation readiness for non-cli execution parity, defaults, and reproducible invocation behavior. Evidence should include lang/hreflang and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: I18n Routing appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the i18n routing evidence for sitespeed programmatic run integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-37","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","api-run","execution","deterministic","i18n-routing","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/analyze',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({url:'https://example.com',includeComprehensiveTests:true})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-run-no-cli check:37","humanCommand":"Validate API-first execution flow parity with sitespeed runWithoutCli patterns; review the i18n-routing evidence dimension for Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-38","testId":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-38","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Readability","description":"Validates human readability, sectioning, sentence complexity, and comprehension support for non-cli execution parity, defaults, and reproducible invocation behavior. Evidence should include extracted content evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Readability appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the readability evidence for sitespeed programmatic run integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-38","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","api-run","execution","deterministic","readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/analyze',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({url:'https://example.com',includeComprehensiveTests:true})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-run-no-cli check:38","humanCommand":"Validate API-first execution flow parity with sitespeed runWithoutCli patterns; review the readability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-39","testId":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-39","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Content Utility","description":"Validates non-placeholder content usefulness and domain-specific public value for non-cli execution parity, defaults, and reproducible invocation behavior. Evidence should include content extraction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Content Utility appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the content utility evidence for sitespeed programmatic run integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-39","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","api-run","execution","deterministic","content-utility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/analyze',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({url:'https://example.com',includeComprehensiveTests:true})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-run-no-cli check:39","humanCommand":"Validate API-first execution flow parity with sitespeed runWithoutCli patterns; review the content-utility evidence dimension for Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-40","testId":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-40","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Recommendation Grounding","description":"Validates recommendation grounding in deterministic evidence instead of fabricated model output for non-cli execution parity, defaults, and reproducible invocation behavior. Evidence should include issue and remediation evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Recommendation Grounding appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the recommendation grounding evidence for sitespeed programmatic run integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-40","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","api-run","execution","deterministic","recommendation-grounding","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/analyze',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({url:'https://example.com',includeComprehensiveTests:true})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-run-no-cli check:40","humanCommand":"Validate API-first execution flow parity with sitespeed runWithoutCli patterns; review the recommendation-grounding evidence dimension for Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-41","testId":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-41","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Evidence Quality","description":"Validates evidence completeness, public safety, and reproducibility for non-cli execution parity, defaults, and reproducible invocation behavior. Evidence should include test output and artifact evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Evidence Quality appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the evidence quality evidence for sitespeed programmatic run integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-41","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","api-run","execution","deterministic","evidence-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/analyze',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({url:'https://example.com',includeComprehensiveTests:true})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-run-no-cli check:41","humanCommand":"Validate API-first execution flow parity with sitespeed runWithoutCli patterns; review the evidence-quality evidence dimension for Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-42","testId":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-42","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Threshold Policy","description":"Validates threshold clarity, pass/warn/fail semantics, and scoring transparency for non-cli execution parity, defaults, and reproducible invocation behavior. Evidence should include threshold and result status evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Threshold Policy appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the threshold policy evidence for sitespeed programmatic run integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-42","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","api-run","execution","deterministic","threshold-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/analyze',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({url:'https://example.com',includeComprehensiveTests:true})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-run-no-cli check:42","humanCommand":"Validate API-first execution flow parity with sitespeed runWithoutCli patterns; review the threshold-policy evidence dimension for Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-43","testId":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-43","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Confidence","description":"Validates confidence scoring and degraded-input disclosure for non-cli execution parity, defaults, and reproducible invocation behavior. Evidence should include source freshness and input availability evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Confidence appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the confidence evidence for sitespeed programmatic run integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-43","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","api-run","execution","deterministic","confidence","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/analyze',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({url:'https://example.com',includeComprehensiveTests:true})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-run-no-cli check:43","humanCommand":"Validate API-first execution flow parity with sitespeed runWithoutCli patterns; review the confidence evidence dimension for Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-44","testId":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-44","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Trend Readiness","description":"Validates historical comparability and timeline readiness for future reruns for non-cli execution parity, defaults, and reproducible invocation behavior. Evidence should include analysis ID, timestamp, and persistence evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Trend Readiness appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the trend readiness evidence for sitespeed programmatic run integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-44","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","api-run","execution","deterministic","trend-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/analyze',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({url:'https://example.com',includeComprehensiveTests:true})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-run-no-cli check:44","humanCommand":"Validate API-first execution flow parity with sitespeed runWithoutCli patterns; review the trend-readiness evidence dimension for Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-45","testId":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-45","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Ranking Readiness","description":"Validates ranking input completeness and profile compatibility for non-cli execution parity, defaults, and reproducible invocation behavior. Evidence should include score and profile evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Ranking Readiness appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ranking readiness evidence for sitespeed programmatic run integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-45","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","api-run","execution","deterministic","ranking-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/analyze',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({url:'https://example.com',includeComprehensiveTests:true})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-run-no-cli check:45","humanCommand":"Validate API-first execution flow parity with sitespeed runWithoutCli patterns; review the ranking-readiness evidence dimension for Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-46","testId":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-46","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Network Contribution","description":"Validates PlatPhorm network contribution through discovery, integrations, and standards compliance for non-cli execution parity, defaults, and reproducible invocation behavior. Evidence should include network graph and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Network Contribution appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the network contribution evidence for sitespeed programmatic run integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-46","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","api-run","execution","deterministic","network-contribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/analyze',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({url:'https://example.com',includeComprehensiveTests:true})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-run-no-cli check:46","humanCommand":"Validate API-first execution flow parity with sitespeed runWithoutCli patterns; review the network-contribution evidence dimension for Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-47","testId":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-47","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Report Readiness","description":"Validates report/export categorization with public-safe evidence and protected boundaries for non-cli execution parity, defaults, and reproducible invocation behavior. Evidence should include report section mapping evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Report Readiness appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the report readiness evidence for sitespeed programmatic run integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-47","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","api-run","execution","deterministic","report-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/analyze',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({url:'https://example.com',includeComprehensiveTests:true})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-run-no-cli check:47","humanCommand":"Validate API-first execution flow parity with sitespeed runWithoutCli patterns; review the report-readiness evidence dimension for Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-48","testId":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-48","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Operator Actionability","description":"Validates clear remediation, owner action, difficulty, and retest path for non-cli execution parity, defaults, and reproducible invocation behavior. Evidence should include fix instructions and command evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Operator Actionability appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the operator actionability evidence for sitespeed programmatic run integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-48","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","api-run","execution","deterministic","operator-actionability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/analyze',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({url:'https://example.com',includeComprehensiveTests:true})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-run-no-cli check:48","humanCommand":"Validate API-first execution flow parity with sitespeed runWithoutCli patterns; review the operator-actionability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-49","testId":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-49","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Degraded State","description":"Validates honest degraded, unavailable, skipped, and not-applicable states for non-cli execution parity, defaults, and reproducible invocation behavior. Evidence should include status and storage evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Degraded State appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the degraded state evidence for sitespeed programmatic run integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-49","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","api-run","execution","deterministic","degraded-state","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/analyze',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({url:'https://example.com',includeComprehensiveTests:true})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-run-no-cli check:49","humanCommand":"Validate API-first execution flow parity with sitespeed runWithoutCli patterns; review the degraded-state evidence dimension for Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-50","testId":"ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-50","suiteId":"best-practices","suiteName":"Best Practices","phase2Dimensions":["overall-quality","route-compliance","pwa","trust-privacy"],"name":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Reproducibility","description":"Validates stable CLI/API/human reproduction path and deterministic rerun instructions for non-cli execution parity, defaults, and reproducible invocation behavior. Evidence should include commands and registry version evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"best-practices-route-quality","reportSectionName":"Best Practices and Route Quality","reportingCategory":"Best Practices and Route Quality / Best Practices","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity: Reproducibility appears in the Best Practices and Route Quality report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the reproducibility evidence for sitespeed programmatic run integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-run-no-cli-50","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","api-run","execution","deterministic","reproducibility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/analyze',{method:'POST',headers:{'content-type':'application/json'},body:JSON.stringify({url:'https://example.com',includeComprehensiveTests:true})}).then(r=>console.log(r.status)).catch(()=>console.log('unavailable'))\" # group:sitespeed-run-no-cli check:50","humanCommand":"Validate API-first execution flow parity with sitespeed runWithoutCli patterns; review the reproducibility evidence dimension for Sitespeed Programmatic Run Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-slack-01","testId":"ni-sitespeed-slack-01","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Availability","description":"Validates public route availability and successful bounded fetch behavior for notification payload quality, fail-safe delivery, and signal-to-noise controls. Evidence should include HTTP status, timeout, and redirect evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Availability appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the availability evidence for sitespeed notification integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-slack-01","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","notifications","alerts","quality","availability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-slack check:1","humanCommand":"Audit outbound alert payload quality against sitespeed slackTests-like contracts; review the availability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Notification Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-slack-02","testId":"ni-sitespeed-slack-02","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Public Safety","description":"Validates public-safe access boundaries without exposing private or protected data for notification payload quality, fail-safe delivery, and signal-to-noise controls. Evidence should include route policy and response-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Public Safety appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the public safety evidence for sitespeed notification integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-slack-02","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","notifications","alerts","quality","public-safety","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-slack check:2","humanCommand":"Audit outbound alert payload quality against sitespeed slackTests-like contracts; review the public-safety evidence dimension for Sitespeed Notification Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-slack-03","testId":"ni-sitespeed-slack-03","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Canonical Url","description":"Validates canonical URL stability and normalized route identity for notification payload quality, fail-safe delivery, and signal-to-noise controls. Evidence should include canonical tags, redirects, and normalized URL evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Canonical Url appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the canonical url evidence for sitespeed notification integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-slack-03","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","notifications","alerts","quality","canonical-url","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-slack check:3","humanCommand":"Audit outbound alert payload quality against sitespeed slackTests-like contracts; review the canonical-url evidence dimension for Sitespeed Notification Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-slack-04","testId":"ni-sitespeed-slack-04","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Metadata Clarity","description":"Validates title, description, and page-specific metadata clarity for notification payload quality, fail-safe delivery, and signal-to-noise controls. Evidence should include HTML metadata and extracted text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Metadata Clarity appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the metadata clarity evidence for sitespeed notification integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-slack-04","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","notifications","alerts","quality","metadata-clarity","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-slack check:4","humanCommand":"Audit outbound alert payload quality against sitespeed slackTests-like contracts; review the metadata-clarity evidence dimension for Sitespeed Notification Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-slack-05","testId":"ni-sitespeed-slack-05","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Semantic Structure","description":"Validates semantic HTML structure for humans, agents, and assistive technology for notification payload quality, fail-safe delivery, and signal-to-noise controls. Evidence should include heading, landmark, and element evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Semantic Structure appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the semantic structure evidence for sitespeed notification integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-slack-05","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","notifications","alerts","quality","semantic-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-slack check:5","humanCommand":"Audit outbound alert payload quality against sitespeed slackTests-like contracts; review the semantic-structure evidence dimension for Sitespeed Notification Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-slack-06","testId":"ni-sitespeed-slack-06","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Machine Readability","description":"Validates machine-readable public content and predictable parsing surfaces for notification payload quality, fail-safe delivery, and signal-to-noise controls. Evidence should include structured tags, JSON-LD, and document-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Machine Readability appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the machine readability evidence for sitespeed notification integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-slack-06","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","notifications","alerts","quality","machine-readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-slack check:6","humanCommand":"Audit outbound alert payload quality against sitespeed slackTests-like contracts; review the machine-readability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Notification Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-slack-07","testId":"ni-sitespeed-slack-07","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Agent Discovery","description":"Validates agent discovery hints and AI-readable policy/documentation signals for notification payload quality, fail-safe delivery, and signal-to-noise controls. Evidence should include llms, policy, MCP, OpenAPI, or schema evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Agent Discovery appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the agent discovery evidence for sitespeed notification integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-slack-07","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","notifications","alerts","quality","agent-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-slack check:7","humanCommand":"Audit outbound alert payload quality against sitespeed slackTests-like contracts; review the agent-discovery evidence dimension for Sitespeed Notification Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-slack-08","testId":"ni-sitespeed-slack-08","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Crawler Discovery","description":"Validates crawler discovery paths through robots, sitemap, feeds, and canonical links for notification payload quality, fail-safe delivery, and signal-to-noise controls. Evidence should include discovery artifact and link evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Crawler Discovery appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the crawler discovery evidence for sitespeed notification integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-slack-08","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","notifications","alerts","quality","crawler-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-slack check:8","humanCommand":"Audit outbound alert payload quality against sitespeed slackTests-like contracts; review the crawler-discovery evidence dimension for Sitespeed Notification Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-slack-09","testId":"ni-sitespeed-slack-09","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Answerability","description":"Validates direct answer extraction and quotable explanatory content for notification payload quality, fail-safe delivery, and signal-to-noise controls. Evidence should include question, summary, heading, and paragraph evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Answerability appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the answerability evidence for sitespeed notification integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-slack-09","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","notifications","alerts","quality","answerability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-slack check:9","humanCommand":"Audit outbound alert payload quality against sitespeed slackTests-like contracts; review the answerability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Notification Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-slack-10","testId":"ni-sitespeed-slack-10","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Generative Context","description":"Validates GEO context quality for generative engines without inventing measured facts for notification payload quality, fail-safe delivery, and signal-to-noise controls. Evidence should include entity, source, and instruction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Generative Context appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the generative context evidence for sitespeed notification integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-slack-10","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","notifications","alerts","quality","generative-context","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-slack check:10","humanCommand":"Audit outbound alert payload quality against sitespeed slackTests-like contracts; review the generative-context evidence dimension for Sitespeed Notification Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-slack-11","testId":"ni-sitespeed-slack-11","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Search Intent","description":"Validates search intent alignment and snippet-friendly content structure for notification payload quality, fail-safe delivery, and signal-to-noise controls. Evidence should include metadata, headings, and topical text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Search Intent appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the search intent evidence for sitespeed notification integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-slack-11","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","notifications","alerts","quality","search-intent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-slack check:11","humanCommand":"Audit outbound alert payload quality against sitespeed slackTests-like contracts; review the search-intent evidence dimension for Sitespeed Notification Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-slack-12","testId":"ni-sitespeed-slack-12","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Accessibility Semantics","description":"Validates accessible names, relationships, landmarks, and keyboard-relevant structure for notification payload quality, fail-safe delivery, and signal-to-noise controls. Evidence should include ARIA, labels, landmarks, and control evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Accessibility Semantics appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the accessibility semantics evidence for sitespeed notification integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-slack-12","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","notifications","alerts","quality","accessibility-semantics","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-slack check:12","humanCommand":"Audit outbound alert payload quality against sitespeed slackTests-like contracts; review the accessibility-semantics evidence dimension for Sitespeed Notification Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-slack-13","testId":"ni-sitespeed-slack-13","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Mobile Readiness","description":"Validates mobile viewport, responsive content, and touch-friendly layout signals for notification payload quality, fail-safe delivery, and signal-to-noise controls. Evidence should include viewport and responsive asset evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Mobile Readiness appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the mobile readiness evidence for sitespeed notification integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-slack-13","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","notifications","alerts","quality","mobile-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-slack check:13","humanCommand":"Audit outbound alert payload quality against sitespeed slackTests-like contracts; review the mobile-readiness evidence dimension for Sitespeed Notification Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-slack-14","testId":"ni-sitespeed-slack-14","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Performance Budget","description":"Validates performance budget compliance using measured or bounded deterministic inputs for notification payload quality, fail-safe delivery, and signal-to-noise controls. Evidence should include timing, byte, and Lighthouse-derived evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Performance Budget appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the performance budget evidence for sitespeed notification integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-slack-14","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","notifications","alerts","quality","performance-budget","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-slack check:14","humanCommand":"Audit outbound alert payload quality against sitespeed slackTests-like contracts; review the performance-budget evidence dimension for Sitespeed Notification Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-slack-15","testId":"ni-sitespeed-slack-15","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Resource Efficiency","description":"Validates resource size, script/style count, and optimization opportunity signals for notification payload quality, fail-safe delivery, and signal-to-noise controls. Evidence should include resource and markup evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Resource Efficiency appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the resource efficiency evidence for sitespeed notification integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-slack-15","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","notifications","alerts","quality","resource-efficiency","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-slack check:15","humanCommand":"Audit outbound alert payload quality against sitespeed slackTests-like contracts; review the resource-efficiency evidence dimension for Sitespeed Notification Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-slack-16","testId":"ni-sitespeed-slack-16","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Cache Freshness","description":"Validates cache behavior, freshness hints, and stale-content risk for notification payload quality, fail-safe delivery, and signal-to-noise controls. Evidence should include HTTP cache and timestamp evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Cache Freshness appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the cache freshness evidence for sitespeed notification integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-slack-16","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","notifications","alerts","quality","cache-freshness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-slack check:16","humanCommand":"Audit outbound alert payload quality against sitespeed slackTests-like contracts; review the cache-freshness evidence dimension for Sitespeed Notification Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-slack-17","testId":"ni-sitespeed-slack-17","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Route Reliability","description":"Validates route reliability, redirect safety, and dead-link risk for notification payload quality, fail-safe delivery, and signal-to-noise controls. Evidence should include status, redirect, and sitemap evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Route Reliability appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the route reliability evidence for sitespeed notification integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-slack-17","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","notifications","alerts","quality","route-reliability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-slack check:17","humanCommand":"Audit outbound alert payload quality against sitespeed slackTests-like contracts; review the route-reliability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Notification Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-slack-18","testId":"ni-sitespeed-slack-18","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Feed Quality","description":"Validates RSS/Atom/feed usefulness, parseability, and freshness for notification payload quality, fail-safe delivery, and signal-to-noise controls. Evidence should include feed XML and item evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Feed Quality appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the feed quality evidence for sitespeed notification integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-slack-18","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","notifications","alerts","quality","feed-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-slack check:18","humanCommand":"Audit outbound alert payload quality against sitespeed slackTests-like contracts; review the feed-quality evidence dimension for Sitespeed Notification Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-slack-19","testId":"ni-sitespeed-slack-19","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Sitemap Quality","description":"Validates sitemap validity, public-safe URL coverage, and no-dead-link policy for notification payload quality, fail-safe delivery, and signal-to-noise controls. Evidence should include sitemap XML and bounded link-check evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Sitemap Quality appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the sitemap quality evidence for sitespeed notification integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-slack-19","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","notifications","alerts","quality","sitemap-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-slack check:19","humanCommand":"Audit outbound alert payload quality against sitespeed slackTests-like contracts; review the sitemap-quality evidence dimension for Sitespeed Notification Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-slack-20","testId":"ni-sitespeed-slack-20","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Robots Alignment","description":"Validates robots.txt alignment with public/protected policy and sitemap discovery for notification payload quality, fail-safe delivery, and signal-to-noise controls. Evidence should include robots directives and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Robots Alignment appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the robots alignment evidence for sitespeed notification integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-slack-20","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","notifications","alerts","quality","robots-alignment","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-slack check:20","humanCommand":"Audit outbound alert payload quality against sitespeed slackTests-like contracts; review the robots-alignment evidence dimension for Sitespeed Notification Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-slack-21","testId":"ni-sitespeed-slack-21","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Llms Structure","description":"Validates llms.txt structure, readability, endpoint coverage, and agent usefulness for notification payload quality, fail-safe delivery, and signal-to-noise controls. Evidence should include plain-text section and line-length evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Llms Structure appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms structure evidence for sitespeed notification integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-slack-21","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","notifications","alerts","quality","llms-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-slack check:21","humanCommand":"Audit outbound alert payload quality against sitespeed slackTests-like contracts; review the llms-structure evidence dimension for Sitespeed Notification Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-slack-22","testId":"ni-sitespeed-slack-22","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Llms Index Schema","description":"Validates llms-index JSON schema shape and count reconciliation for notification payload quality, fail-safe delivery, and signal-to-noise controls. Evidence should include JSON keys, counts, and endpoint evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Llms Index Schema appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms index schema evidence for sitespeed notification integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-slack-22","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","notifications","alerts","quality","llms-index-schema","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-slack check:22","humanCommand":"Audit outbound alert payload quality against sitespeed slackTests-like contracts; review the llms-index-schema evidence dimension for Sitespeed Notification Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-slack-23","testId":"ni-sitespeed-slack-23","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Humans Attribution","description":"Validates humans.txt attribution, maintainer, technology, and governance transparency for notification payload quality, fail-safe delivery, and signal-to-noise controls. Evidence should include humans.txt section evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Humans Attribution appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the humans attribution evidence for sitespeed notification integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-slack-23","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","notifications","alerts","quality","humans-attribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-slack check:23","humanCommand":"Audit outbound alert payload quality against sitespeed slackTests-like contracts; review the humans-attribution evidence dimension for Sitespeed Notification Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-slack-24","testId":"ni-sitespeed-slack-24","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Agent Policy","description":"Validates agent-policy JSON clarity for allowed, disallowed, and protected operations for notification payload quality, fail-safe delivery, and signal-to-noise controls. Evidence should include well-known policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Agent Policy appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the agent policy evidence for sitespeed notification integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-slack-24","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","notifications","alerts","quality","agent-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-slack check:24","humanCommand":"Audit outbound alert payload quality against sitespeed slackTests-like contracts; review the agent-policy evidence dimension for Sitespeed Notification Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-slack-25","testId":"ni-sitespeed-slack-25","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Ai Policy","description":"Validates AI policy clarity for training, search, answer use, caching, and attribution for notification payload quality, fail-safe delivery, and signal-to-noise controls. Evidence should include well-known AI policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Ai Policy appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ai policy evidence for sitespeed notification integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-slack-25","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","notifications","alerts","quality","ai-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-slack check:25","humanCommand":"Audit outbound alert payload quality against sitespeed slackTests-like contracts; review the ai-policy evidence dimension for Sitespeed Notification Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-slack-26","testId":"ni-sitespeed-slack-26","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Trust Policy","description":"Validates trust policy coverage for privacy, traceability, metadata, and protected actions for notification payload quality, fail-safe delivery, and signal-to-noise controls. Evidence should include trust.json evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Trust Policy appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the trust policy evidence for sitespeed notification integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-slack-26","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","notifications","alerts","quality","trust-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-slack check:26","humanCommand":"Audit outbound alert payload quality against sitespeed slackTests-like contracts; review the trust-policy evidence dimension for Sitespeed Notification Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-slack-27","testId":"ni-sitespeed-slack-27","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Openapi Contract","description":"Validates OpenAPI availability, server URL accuracy, schemas, and auth policy for notification payload quality, fail-safe delivery, and signal-to-noise controls. Evidence should include OpenAPI text/JSON evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Openapi Contract appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the openapi contract evidence for sitespeed notification integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-slack-27","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","notifications","alerts","quality","openapi-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-slack check:27","humanCommand":"Audit outbound alert payload quality against sitespeed slackTests-like contracts; review the openapi-contract evidence dimension for Sitespeed Notification Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-slack-28","testId":"ni-sitespeed-slack-28","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Mcp Contract","description":"Validates MCP JSON-RPC introspection, real tools, resources, and protected boundaries for notification payload quality, fail-safe delivery, and signal-to-noise controls. Evidence should include MCP manifest and initialize evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Mcp Contract appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the mcp contract evidence for sitespeed notification integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-slack-28","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","notifications","alerts","quality","mcp-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-slack check:28","humanCommand":"Audit outbound alert payload quality against sitespeed slackTests-like contracts; review the mcp-contract evidence dimension for Sitespeed Notification Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-slack-29","testId":"ni-sitespeed-slack-29","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Api Error Shape","description":"Validates API success/error response shape consistency for notification payload quality, fail-safe delivery, and signal-to-noise controls. Evidence should include REST envelope evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Api Error Shape appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the api error shape evidence for sitespeed notification integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-slack-29","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","notifications","alerts","quality","api-error-shape","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-slack check:29","humanCommand":"Audit outbound alert payload quality against sitespeed slackTests-like contracts; review the api-error-shape evidence dimension for Sitespeed Notification Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-slack-30","testId":"ni-sitespeed-slack-30","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Traceability","description":"Validates trace propagation, request IDs, and safe observability correlation for notification payload quality, fail-safe delivery, and signal-to-noise controls. Evidence should include trace header and metadata evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Traceability appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the traceability evidence for sitespeed notification integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-slack-30","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","notifications","alerts","quality","traceability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-slack check:30","humanCommand":"Audit outbound alert payload quality against sitespeed slackTests-like contracts; review the traceability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Notification Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-slack-31","testId":"ni-sitespeed-slack-31","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Ja4 Redaction","description":"Validates fingerprint-adjacent metadata redaction and non-public raw JA4 handling for notification payload quality, fail-safe delivery, and signal-to-noise controls. Evidence should include metadata policy and redaction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Ja4 Redaction appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the ja4 redaction evidence for sitespeed notification integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-slack-31","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","notifications","alerts","quality","ja4-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-slack check:31","humanCommand":"Audit outbound alert payload quality against sitespeed slackTests-like contracts; review the ja4-redaction evidence dimension for Sitespeed Notification Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-slack-32","testId":"ni-sitespeed-slack-32","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Secret Redaction","description":"Validates absence of secrets, generic key examples, cookies, and raw tokens in public outputs for notification payload quality, fail-safe delivery, and signal-to-noise controls. Evidence should include public artifact scan evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Secret Redaction appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the secret redaction evidence for sitespeed notification integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-slack-32","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","notifications","alerts","quality","secret-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-slack check:32","humanCommand":"Audit outbound alert payload quality against sitespeed slackTests-like contracts; review the secret-redaction evidence dimension for Sitespeed Notification Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-slack-33","testId":"ni-sitespeed-slack-33","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Security Headers","description":"Validates security header coverage and hardened transport signals for notification payload quality, fail-safe delivery, and signal-to-noise controls. Evidence should include HTTP header evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Security Headers appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the security headers evidence for sitespeed notification integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-slack-33","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","notifications","alerts","quality","security-headers","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-slack check:33","humanCommand":"Audit outbound alert payload quality against sitespeed slackTests-like contracts; review the security-headers evidence dimension for Sitespeed Notification Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-slack-34","testId":"ni-sitespeed-slack-34","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Privacy Consent","description":"Validates privacy policy, consent, attribution, and data-use disclosure quality for notification payload quality, fail-safe delivery, and signal-to-noise controls. Evidence should include public page and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Privacy Consent appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the privacy consent evidence for sitespeed notification integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-slack-34","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","notifications","alerts","quality","privacy-consent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-slack check:34","humanCommand":"Audit outbound alert payload quality against sitespeed slackTests-like contracts; review the privacy-consent evidence dimension for Sitespeed Notification Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-slack-35","testId":"ni-sitespeed-slack-35","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Structured Data","description":"Validates JSON-LD and entity modeling for machine interpretation for notification payload quality, fail-safe delivery, and signal-to-noise controls. Evidence should include schema block and parse evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Structured Data appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the structured data evidence for sitespeed notification integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-slack-35","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","notifications","alerts","quality","structured-data","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-slack check:35","humanCommand":"Audit outbound alert payload quality against sitespeed slackTests-like contracts; review the structured-data evidence dimension for Sitespeed Notification Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-slack-36","testId":"ni-sitespeed-slack-36","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Social Preview","description":"Validates Open Graph and Twitter/X card readiness for public sharing for notification payload quality, fail-safe delivery, and signal-to-noise controls. Evidence should include meta tag evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Social Preview appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the social preview evidence for sitespeed notification integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-slack-36","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","notifications","alerts","quality","social-preview","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-slack check:36","humanCommand":"Audit outbound alert payload quality against sitespeed slackTests-like contracts; review the social-preview evidence dimension for Sitespeed Notification Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-slack-37","testId":"ni-sitespeed-slack-37","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: I18n Routing","description":"Validates locale route, hreflang, language declaration, and translation readiness for notification payload quality, fail-safe delivery, and signal-to-noise controls. Evidence should include lang/hreflang and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: I18n Routing appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the i18n routing evidence for sitespeed notification integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-slack-37","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","notifications","alerts","quality","i18n-routing","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-slack check:37","humanCommand":"Audit outbound alert payload quality against sitespeed slackTests-like contracts; review the i18n-routing evidence dimension for Sitespeed Notification Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-slack-38","testId":"ni-sitespeed-slack-38","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Readability","description":"Validates human readability, sectioning, sentence complexity, and comprehension support for notification payload quality, fail-safe delivery, and signal-to-noise controls. Evidence should include extracted content evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Readability appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the readability evidence for sitespeed notification integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-slack-38","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","notifications","alerts","quality","readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-slack check:38","humanCommand":"Audit outbound alert payload quality against sitespeed slackTests-like contracts; review the readability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Notification Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-slack-39","testId":"ni-sitespeed-slack-39","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Content Utility","description":"Validates non-placeholder content usefulness and domain-specific public value for notification payload quality, fail-safe delivery, and signal-to-noise controls. Evidence should include content extraction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Content Utility appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the content utility evidence for sitespeed notification integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-slack-39","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","notifications","alerts","quality","content-utility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-slack check:39","humanCommand":"Audit outbound alert payload quality against sitespeed slackTests-like contracts; review the content-utility evidence dimension for Sitespeed Notification Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-slack-40","testId":"ni-sitespeed-slack-40","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Recommendation Grounding","description":"Validates recommendation grounding in deterministic evidence instead of fabricated model output for notification payload quality, fail-safe delivery, and signal-to-noise controls. Evidence should include issue and remediation evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Recommendation Grounding appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the recommendation grounding evidence for sitespeed notification integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-slack-40","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","notifications","alerts","quality","recommendation-grounding","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-slack check:40","humanCommand":"Audit outbound alert payload quality against sitespeed slackTests-like contracts; review the recommendation-grounding evidence dimension for Sitespeed Notification Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-slack-41","testId":"ni-sitespeed-slack-41","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Evidence Quality","description":"Validates evidence completeness, public safety, and reproducibility for notification payload quality, fail-safe delivery, and signal-to-noise controls. Evidence should include test output and artifact evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Evidence Quality appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the evidence quality evidence for sitespeed notification integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-slack-41","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","notifications","alerts","quality","evidence-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-slack check:41","humanCommand":"Audit outbound alert payload quality against sitespeed slackTests-like contracts; review the evidence-quality evidence dimension for Sitespeed Notification Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-slack-42","testId":"ni-sitespeed-slack-42","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Threshold Policy","description":"Validates threshold clarity, pass/warn/fail semantics, and scoring transparency for notification payload quality, fail-safe delivery, and signal-to-noise controls. Evidence should include threshold and result status evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Threshold Policy appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the threshold policy evidence for sitespeed notification integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-slack-42","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","notifications","alerts","quality","threshold-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-slack check:42","humanCommand":"Audit outbound alert payload quality against sitespeed slackTests-like contracts; review the threshold-policy evidence dimension for Sitespeed Notification Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-slack-43","testId":"ni-sitespeed-slack-43","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Confidence","description":"Validates confidence scoring and degraded-input disclosure for notification payload quality, fail-safe delivery, and signal-to-noise controls. Evidence should include source freshness and input availability evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Confidence appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the confidence evidence for sitespeed notification integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-slack-43","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","notifications","alerts","quality","confidence","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-slack check:43","humanCommand":"Audit outbound alert payload quality against sitespeed slackTests-like contracts; review the confidence evidence dimension for Sitespeed Notification Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-slack-44","testId":"ni-sitespeed-slack-44","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Trend Readiness","description":"Validates historical comparability and timeline readiness for future reruns for notification payload quality, fail-safe delivery, and signal-to-noise controls. Evidence should include analysis ID, timestamp, and persistence evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Trend Readiness appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the trend readiness evidence for sitespeed notification integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-slack-44","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","notifications","alerts","quality","trend-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-slack check:44","humanCommand":"Audit outbound alert payload quality against sitespeed slackTests-like contracts; review the trend-readiness evidence dimension for Sitespeed Notification Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-slack-45","testId":"ni-sitespeed-slack-45","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Ranking Readiness","description":"Validates ranking input completeness and profile compatibility for notification payload quality, fail-safe delivery, and signal-to-noise controls. Evidence should include score and profile evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Ranking Readiness appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ranking readiness evidence for sitespeed notification integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-slack-45","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","notifications","alerts","quality","ranking-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-slack check:45","humanCommand":"Audit outbound alert payload quality against sitespeed slackTests-like contracts; review the ranking-readiness evidence dimension for Sitespeed Notification Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-slack-46","testId":"ni-sitespeed-slack-46","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Network Contribution","description":"Validates PlatPhorm network contribution through discovery, integrations, and standards compliance for notification payload quality, fail-safe delivery, and signal-to-noise controls. Evidence should include network graph and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Network Contribution appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the network contribution evidence for sitespeed notification integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-slack-46","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","notifications","alerts","quality","network-contribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-slack check:46","humanCommand":"Audit outbound alert payload quality against sitespeed slackTests-like contracts; review the network-contribution evidence dimension for Sitespeed Notification Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-slack-47","testId":"ni-sitespeed-slack-47","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Report Readiness","description":"Validates report/export categorization with public-safe evidence and protected boundaries for notification payload quality, fail-safe delivery, and signal-to-noise controls. Evidence should include report section mapping evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Report Readiness appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the report readiness evidence for sitespeed notification integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-slack-47","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","notifications","alerts","quality","report-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-slack check:47","humanCommand":"Audit outbound alert payload quality against sitespeed slackTests-like contracts; review the report-readiness evidence dimension for Sitespeed Notification Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-slack-48","testId":"ni-sitespeed-slack-48","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Operator Actionability","description":"Validates clear remediation, owner action, difficulty, and retest path for notification payload quality, fail-safe delivery, and signal-to-noise controls. Evidence should include fix instructions and command evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Operator Actionability appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the operator actionability evidence for sitespeed notification integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-slack-48","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","notifications","alerts","quality","operator-actionability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-slack check:48","humanCommand":"Audit outbound alert payload quality against sitespeed slackTests-like contracts; review the operator-actionability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Notification Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-slack-49","testId":"ni-sitespeed-slack-49","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Degraded State","description":"Validates honest degraded, unavailable, skipped, and not-applicable states for notification payload quality, fail-safe delivery, and signal-to-noise controls. Evidence should include status and storage evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Degraded State appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the degraded state evidence for sitespeed notification integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-slack-49","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","notifications","alerts","quality","degraded-state","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-slack check:49","humanCommand":"Audit outbound alert payload quality against sitespeed slackTests-like contracts; review the degraded-state evidence dimension for Sitespeed Notification Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-slack-50","testId":"ni-sitespeed-slack-50","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Reproducibility","description":"Validates stable CLI/API/human reproduction path and deterministic rerun instructions for notification payload quality, fail-safe delivery, and signal-to-noise controls. Evidence should include commands and registry version evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Notification Integrity: Reproducibility appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the reproducibility evidence for sitespeed notification integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-slack-50","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","notifications","alerts","quality","reproducibility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/health').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-slack check:50","humanCommand":"Audit outbound alert payload quality against sitespeed slackTests-like contracts; review the reproducibility evidence dimension for Sitespeed Notification Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-storage-01","testId":"ni-sitespeed-storage-01","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Availability","description":"Validates public route availability and successful bounded fetch behavior for storage lifecycle consistency, retention boundaries, and degraded-state honesty. Evidence should include HTTP status, timeout, and redirect evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Availability appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the availability evidence for sitespeed storage manager integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-storage-01","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","storage","durability","degraded","availability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/dashboard').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-storage check:1","humanCommand":"Verify storage/degraded transitions against sitespeed storageManagerTests concepts; review the availability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-storage-02","testId":"ni-sitespeed-storage-02","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Public Safety","description":"Validates public-safe access boundaries without exposing private or protected data for storage lifecycle consistency, retention boundaries, and degraded-state honesty. Evidence should include route policy and response-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Public Safety appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the public safety evidence for sitespeed storage manager integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-storage-02","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","storage","durability","degraded","public-safety","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/dashboard').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-storage check:2","humanCommand":"Verify storage/degraded transitions against sitespeed storageManagerTests concepts; review the public-safety evidence dimension for Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-storage-03","testId":"ni-sitespeed-storage-03","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Canonical Url","description":"Validates canonical URL stability and normalized route identity for storage lifecycle consistency, retention boundaries, and degraded-state honesty. Evidence should include canonical tags, redirects, and normalized URL evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Canonical Url appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the canonical url evidence for sitespeed storage manager integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-storage-03","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","storage","durability","degraded","canonical-url","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/dashboard').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-storage check:3","humanCommand":"Verify storage/degraded transitions against sitespeed storageManagerTests concepts; review the canonical-url evidence dimension for Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-storage-04","testId":"ni-sitespeed-storage-04","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Metadata Clarity","description":"Validates title, description, and page-specific metadata clarity for storage lifecycle consistency, retention boundaries, and degraded-state honesty. Evidence should include HTML metadata and extracted text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Metadata Clarity appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the metadata clarity evidence for sitespeed storage manager integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-storage-04","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","storage","durability","degraded","metadata-clarity","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/dashboard').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-storage check:4","humanCommand":"Verify storage/degraded transitions against sitespeed storageManagerTests concepts; review the metadata-clarity evidence dimension for Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-storage-05","testId":"ni-sitespeed-storage-05","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Semantic Structure","description":"Validates semantic HTML structure for humans, agents, and assistive technology for storage lifecycle consistency, retention boundaries, and degraded-state honesty. Evidence should include heading, landmark, and element evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Semantic Structure appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the semantic structure evidence for sitespeed storage manager integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-storage-05","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","storage","durability","degraded","semantic-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/dashboard').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-storage check:5","humanCommand":"Verify storage/degraded transitions against sitespeed storageManagerTests concepts; review the semantic-structure evidence dimension for Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-storage-06","testId":"ni-sitespeed-storage-06","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Machine Readability","description":"Validates machine-readable public content and predictable parsing surfaces for storage lifecycle consistency, retention boundaries, and degraded-state honesty. Evidence should include structured tags, JSON-LD, and document-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Machine Readability appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the machine readability evidence for sitespeed storage manager integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-storage-06","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","storage","durability","degraded","machine-readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/dashboard').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-storage check:6","humanCommand":"Verify storage/degraded transitions against sitespeed storageManagerTests concepts; review the machine-readability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-storage-07","testId":"ni-sitespeed-storage-07","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Agent Discovery","description":"Validates agent discovery hints and AI-readable policy/documentation signals for storage lifecycle consistency, retention boundaries, and degraded-state honesty. Evidence should include llms, policy, MCP, OpenAPI, or schema evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Agent Discovery appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the agent discovery evidence for sitespeed storage manager integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-storage-07","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","storage","durability","degraded","agent-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/dashboard').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-storage check:7","humanCommand":"Verify storage/degraded transitions against sitespeed storageManagerTests concepts; review the agent-discovery evidence dimension for Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-storage-08","testId":"ni-sitespeed-storage-08","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Crawler Discovery","description":"Validates crawler discovery paths through robots, sitemap, feeds, and canonical links for storage lifecycle consistency, retention boundaries, and degraded-state honesty. Evidence should include discovery artifact and link evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Crawler Discovery appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the crawler discovery evidence for sitespeed storage manager integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-storage-08","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","storage","durability","degraded","crawler-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/dashboard').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-storage check:8","humanCommand":"Verify storage/degraded transitions against sitespeed storageManagerTests concepts; review the crawler-discovery evidence dimension for Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-storage-09","testId":"ni-sitespeed-storage-09","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Answerability","description":"Validates direct answer extraction and quotable explanatory content for storage lifecycle consistency, retention boundaries, and degraded-state honesty. Evidence should include question, summary, heading, and paragraph evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Answerability appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the answerability evidence for sitespeed storage manager integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-storage-09","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","storage","durability","degraded","answerability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/dashboard').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-storage check:9","humanCommand":"Verify storage/degraded transitions against sitespeed storageManagerTests concepts; review the answerability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-storage-10","testId":"ni-sitespeed-storage-10","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Generative Context","description":"Validates GEO context quality for generative engines without inventing measured facts for storage lifecycle consistency, retention boundaries, and degraded-state honesty. Evidence should include entity, source, and instruction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Generative Context appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the generative context evidence for sitespeed storage manager integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-storage-10","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","storage","durability","degraded","generative-context","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/dashboard').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-storage check:10","humanCommand":"Verify storage/degraded transitions against sitespeed storageManagerTests concepts; review the generative-context evidence dimension for Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-storage-11","testId":"ni-sitespeed-storage-11","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Search Intent","description":"Validates search intent alignment and snippet-friendly content structure for storage lifecycle consistency, retention boundaries, and degraded-state honesty. Evidence should include metadata, headings, and topical text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Search Intent appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the search intent evidence for sitespeed storage manager integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-storage-11","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","storage","durability","degraded","search-intent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/dashboard').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-storage check:11","humanCommand":"Verify storage/degraded transitions against sitespeed storageManagerTests concepts; review the search-intent evidence dimension for Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-storage-12","testId":"ni-sitespeed-storage-12","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Accessibility Semantics","description":"Validates accessible names, relationships, landmarks, and keyboard-relevant structure for storage lifecycle consistency, retention boundaries, and degraded-state honesty. Evidence should include ARIA, labels, landmarks, and control evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Accessibility Semantics appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the accessibility semantics evidence for sitespeed storage manager integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-storage-12","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","storage","durability","degraded","accessibility-semantics","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/dashboard').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-storage check:12","humanCommand":"Verify storage/degraded transitions against sitespeed storageManagerTests concepts; review the accessibility-semantics evidence dimension for Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-storage-13","testId":"ni-sitespeed-storage-13","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Mobile Readiness","description":"Validates mobile viewport, responsive content, and touch-friendly layout signals for storage lifecycle consistency, retention boundaries, and degraded-state honesty. Evidence should include viewport and responsive asset evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Mobile Readiness appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the mobile readiness evidence for sitespeed storage manager integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-storage-13","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","storage","durability","degraded","mobile-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/dashboard').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-storage check:13","humanCommand":"Verify storage/degraded transitions against sitespeed storageManagerTests concepts; review the mobile-readiness evidence dimension for Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-storage-14","testId":"ni-sitespeed-storage-14","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Performance Budget","description":"Validates performance budget compliance using measured or bounded deterministic inputs for storage lifecycle consistency, retention boundaries, and degraded-state honesty. Evidence should include timing, byte, and Lighthouse-derived evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Performance Budget appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the performance budget evidence for sitespeed storage manager integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-storage-14","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","storage","durability","degraded","performance-budget","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/dashboard').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-storage check:14","humanCommand":"Verify storage/degraded transitions against sitespeed storageManagerTests concepts; review the performance-budget evidence dimension for Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-storage-15","testId":"ni-sitespeed-storage-15","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Resource Efficiency","description":"Validates resource size, script/style count, and optimization opportunity signals for storage lifecycle consistency, retention boundaries, and degraded-state honesty. Evidence should include resource and markup evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Resource Efficiency appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the resource efficiency evidence for sitespeed storage manager integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-storage-15","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","storage","durability","degraded","resource-efficiency","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/dashboard').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-storage check:15","humanCommand":"Verify storage/degraded transitions against sitespeed storageManagerTests concepts; review the resource-efficiency evidence dimension for Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-storage-16","testId":"ni-sitespeed-storage-16","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Cache Freshness","description":"Validates cache behavior, freshness hints, and stale-content risk for storage lifecycle consistency, retention boundaries, and degraded-state honesty. Evidence should include HTTP cache and timestamp evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Cache Freshness appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the cache freshness evidence for sitespeed storage manager integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-storage-16","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","storage","durability","degraded","cache-freshness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/dashboard').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-storage check:16","humanCommand":"Verify storage/degraded transitions against sitespeed storageManagerTests concepts; review the cache-freshness evidence dimension for Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-storage-17","testId":"ni-sitespeed-storage-17","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Route Reliability","description":"Validates route reliability, redirect safety, and dead-link risk for storage lifecycle consistency, retention boundaries, and degraded-state honesty. Evidence should include status, redirect, and sitemap evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Route Reliability appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the route reliability evidence for sitespeed storage manager integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-storage-17","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","storage","durability","degraded","route-reliability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/dashboard').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-storage check:17","humanCommand":"Verify storage/degraded transitions against sitespeed storageManagerTests concepts; review the route-reliability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-storage-18","testId":"ni-sitespeed-storage-18","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Feed Quality","description":"Validates RSS/Atom/feed usefulness, parseability, and freshness for storage lifecycle consistency, retention boundaries, and degraded-state honesty. Evidence should include feed XML and item evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Feed Quality appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the feed quality evidence for sitespeed storage manager integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-storage-18","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","storage","durability","degraded","feed-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/dashboard').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-storage check:18","humanCommand":"Verify storage/degraded transitions against sitespeed storageManagerTests concepts; review the feed-quality evidence dimension for Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-storage-19","testId":"ni-sitespeed-storage-19","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Sitemap Quality","description":"Validates sitemap validity, public-safe URL coverage, and no-dead-link policy for storage lifecycle consistency, retention boundaries, and degraded-state honesty. Evidence should include sitemap XML and bounded link-check evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Sitemap Quality appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the sitemap quality evidence for sitespeed storage manager integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-storage-19","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","storage","durability","degraded","sitemap-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/dashboard').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-storage check:19","humanCommand":"Verify storage/degraded transitions against sitespeed storageManagerTests concepts; review the sitemap-quality evidence dimension for Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-storage-20","testId":"ni-sitespeed-storage-20","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Robots Alignment","description":"Validates robots.txt alignment with public/protected policy and sitemap discovery for storage lifecycle consistency, retention boundaries, and degraded-state honesty. Evidence should include robots directives and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Robots Alignment appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the robots alignment evidence for sitespeed storage manager integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-storage-20","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","storage","durability","degraded","robots-alignment","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/dashboard').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-storage check:20","humanCommand":"Verify storage/degraded transitions against sitespeed storageManagerTests concepts; review the robots-alignment evidence dimension for Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-storage-21","testId":"ni-sitespeed-storage-21","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Llms Structure","description":"Validates llms.txt structure, readability, endpoint coverage, and agent usefulness for storage lifecycle consistency, retention boundaries, and degraded-state honesty. Evidence should include plain-text section and line-length evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Llms Structure appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms structure evidence for sitespeed storage manager integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-storage-21","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","storage","durability","degraded","llms-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/dashboard').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-storage check:21","humanCommand":"Verify storage/degraded transitions against sitespeed storageManagerTests concepts; review the llms-structure evidence dimension for Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-storage-22","testId":"ni-sitespeed-storage-22","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Llms Index Schema","description":"Validates llms-index JSON schema shape and count reconciliation for storage lifecycle consistency, retention boundaries, and degraded-state honesty. Evidence should include JSON keys, counts, and endpoint evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Llms Index Schema appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms index schema evidence for sitespeed storage manager integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-storage-22","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","storage","durability","degraded","llms-index-schema","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/dashboard').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-storage check:22","humanCommand":"Verify storage/degraded transitions against sitespeed storageManagerTests concepts; review the llms-index-schema evidence dimension for Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-storage-23","testId":"ni-sitespeed-storage-23","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Humans Attribution","description":"Validates humans.txt attribution, maintainer, technology, and governance transparency for storage lifecycle consistency, retention boundaries, and degraded-state honesty. Evidence should include humans.txt section evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Humans Attribution appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the humans attribution evidence for sitespeed storage manager integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-storage-23","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","storage","durability","degraded","humans-attribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/dashboard').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-storage check:23","humanCommand":"Verify storage/degraded transitions against sitespeed storageManagerTests concepts; review the humans-attribution evidence dimension for Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-storage-24","testId":"ni-sitespeed-storage-24","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Agent Policy","description":"Validates agent-policy JSON clarity for allowed, disallowed, and protected operations for storage lifecycle consistency, retention boundaries, and degraded-state honesty. Evidence should include well-known policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Agent Policy appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the agent policy evidence for sitespeed storage manager integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-storage-24","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","storage","durability","degraded","agent-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/dashboard').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-storage check:24","humanCommand":"Verify storage/degraded transitions against sitespeed storageManagerTests concepts; review the agent-policy evidence dimension for Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-storage-25","testId":"ni-sitespeed-storage-25","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Ai Policy","description":"Validates AI policy clarity for training, search, answer use, caching, and attribution for storage lifecycle consistency, retention boundaries, and degraded-state honesty. Evidence should include well-known AI policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Ai Policy appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ai policy evidence for sitespeed storage manager integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-storage-25","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","storage","durability","degraded","ai-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/dashboard').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-storage check:25","humanCommand":"Verify storage/degraded transitions against sitespeed storageManagerTests concepts; review the ai-policy evidence dimension for Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-storage-26","testId":"ni-sitespeed-storage-26","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Trust Policy","description":"Validates trust policy coverage for privacy, traceability, metadata, and protected actions for storage lifecycle consistency, retention boundaries, and degraded-state honesty. Evidence should include trust.json evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Trust Policy appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the trust policy evidence for sitespeed storage manager integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-storage-26","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","storage","durability","degraded","trust-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/dashboard').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-storage check:26","humanCommand":"Verify storage/degraded transitions against sitespeed storageManagerTests concepts; review the trust-policy evidence dimension for Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-storage-27","testId":"ni-sitespeed-storage-27","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Openapi Contract","description":"Validates OpenAPI availability, server URL accuracy, schemas, and auth policy for storage lifecycle consistency, retention boundaries, and degraded-state honesty. Evidence should include OpenAPI text/JSON evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Openapi Contract appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the openapi contract evidence for sitespeed storage manager integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-storage-27","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","storage","durability","degraded","openapi-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/dashboard').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-storage check:27","humanCommand":"Verify storage/degraded transitions against sitespeed storageManagerTests concepts; review the openapi-contract evidence dimension for Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-storage-28","testId":"ni-sitespeed-storage-28","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Mcp Contract","description":"Validates MCP JSON-RPC introspection, real tools, resources, and protected boundaries for storage lifecycle consistency, retention boundaries, and degraded-state honesty. Evidence should include MCP manifest and initialize evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Mcp Contract appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the mcp contract evidence for sitespeed storage manager integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-storage-28","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","storage","durability","degraded","mcp-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/dashboard').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-storage check:28","humanCommand":"Verify storage/degraded transitions against sitespeed storageManagerTests concepts; review the mcp-contract evidence dimension for Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-storage-29","testId":"ni-sitespeed-storage-29","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Api Error Shape","description":"Validates API success/error response shape consistency for storage lifecycle consistency, retention boundaries, and degraded-state honesty. Evidence should include REST envelope evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Api Error Shape appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the api error shape evidence for sitespeed storage manager integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-storage-29","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","storage","durability","degraded","api-error-shape","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/dashboard').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-storage check:29","humanCommand":"Verify storage/degraded transitions against sitespeed storageManagerTests concepts; review the api-error-shape evidence dimension for Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-storage-30","testId":"ni-sitespeed-storage-30","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Traceability","description":"Validates trace propagation, request IDs, and safe observability correlation for storage lifecycle consistency, retention boundaries, and degraded-state honesty. Evidence should include trace header and metadata evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Traceability appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the traceability evidence for sitespeed storage manager integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-storage-30","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","storage","durability","degraded","traceability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/dashboard').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-storage check:30","humanCommand":"Verify storage/degraded transitions against sitespeed storageManagerTests concepts; review the traceability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-storage-31","testId":"ni-sitespeed-storage-31","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Ja4 Redaction","description":"Validates fingerprint-adjacent metadata redaction and non-public raw JA4 handling for storage lifecycle consistency, retention boundaries, and degraded-state honesty. Evidence should include metadata policy and redaction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Ja4 Redaction appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the ja4 redaction evidence for sitespeed storage manager integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-storage-31","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","storage","durability","degraded","ja4-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/dashboard').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-storage check:31","humanCommand":"Verify storage/degraded transitions against sitespeed storageManagerTests concepts; review the ja4-redaction evidence dimension for Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-storage-32","testId":"ni-sitespeed-storage-32","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Secret Redaction","description":"Validates absence of secrets, generic key examples, cookies, and raw tokens in public outputs for storage lifecycle consistency, retention boundaries, and degraded-state honesty. Evidence should include public artifact scan evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Secret Redaction appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the secret redaction evidence for sitespeed storage manager integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-storage-32","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","storage","durability","degraded","secret-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/dashboard').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-storage check:32","humanCommand":"Verify storage/degraded transitions against sitespeed storageManagerTests concepts; review the secret-redaction evidence dimension for Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-storage-33","testId":"ni-sitespeed-storage-33","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Security Headers","description":"Validates security header coverage and hardened transport signals for storage lifecycle consistency, retention boundaries, and degraded-state honesty. Evidence should include HTTP header evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Security Headers appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the security headers evidence for sitespeed storage manager integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-storage-33","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","storage","durability","degraded","security-headers","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/dashboard').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-storage check:33","humanCommand":"Verify storage/degraded transitions against sitespeed storageManagerTests concepts; review the security-headers evidence dimension for Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-storage-34","testId":"ni-sitespeed-storage-34","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Privacy Consent","description":"Validates privacy policy, consent, attribution, and data-use disclosure quality for storage lifecycle consistency, retention boundaries, and degraded-state honesty. Evidence should include public page and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Privacy Consent appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the privacy consent evidence for sitespeed storage manager integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-storage-34","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","storage","durability","degraded","privacy-consent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/dashboard').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-storage check:34","humanCommand":"Verify storage/degraded transitions against sitespeed storageManagerTests concepts; review the privacy-consent evidence dimension for Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-storage-35","testId":"ni-sitespeed-storage-35","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Structured Data","description":"Validates JSON-LD and entity modeling for machine interpretation for storage lifecycle consistency, retention boundaries, and degraded-state honesty. Evidence should include schema block and parse evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Structured Data appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the structured data evidence for sitespeed storage manager integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-storage-35","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","storage","durability","degraded","structured-data","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/dashboard').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-storage check:35","humanCommand":"Verify storage/degraded transitions against sitespeed storageManagerTests concepts; review the structured-data evidence dimension for Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-storage-36","testId":"ni-sitespeed-storage-36","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Social Preview","description":"Validates Open Graph and Twitter/X card readiness for public sharing for storage lifecycle consistency, retention boundaries, and degraded-state honesty. Evidence should include meta tag evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Social Preview appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the social preview evidence for sitespeed storage manager integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-storage-36","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","storage","durability","degraded","social-preview","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/dashboard').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-storage check:36","humanCommand":"Verify storage/degraded transitions against sitespeed storageManagerTests concepts; review the social-preview evidence dimension for Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-storage-37","testId":"ni-sitespeed-storage-37","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: I18n Routing","description":"Validates locale route, hreflang, language declaration, and translation readiness for storage lifecycle consistency, retention boundaries, and degraded-state honesty. Evidence should include lang/hreflang and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: I18n Routing appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the i18n routing evidence for sitespeed storage manager integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-storage-37","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","storage","durability","degraded","i18n-routing","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/dashboard').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-storage check:37","humanCommand":"Verify storage/degraded transitions against sitespeed storageManagerTests concepts; review the i18n-routing evidence dimension for Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-storage-38","testId":"ni-sitespeed-storage-38","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Readability","description":"Validates human readability, sectioning, sentence complexity, and comprehension support for storage lifecycle consistency, retention boundaries, and degraded-state honesty. Evidence should include extracted content evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Readability appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the readability evidence for sitespeed storage manager integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-storage-38","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","storage","durability","degraded","readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/dashboard').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-storage check:38","humanCommand":"Verify storage/degraded transitions against sitespeed storageManagerTests concepts; review the readability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-storage-39","testId":"ni-sitespeed-storage-39","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Content Utility","description":"Validates non-placeholder content usefulness and domain-specific public value for storage lifecycle consistency, retention boundaries, and degraded-state honesty. Evidence should include content extraction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Content Utility appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the content utility evidence for sitespeed storage manager integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-storage-39","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","storage","durability","degraded","content-utility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/dashboard').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-storage check:39","humanCommand":"Verify storage/degraded transitions against sitespeed storageManagerTests concepts; review the content-utility evidence dimension for Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-storage-40","testId":"ni-sitespeed-storage-40","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Recommendation Grounding","description":"Validates recommendation grounding in deterministic evidence instead of fabricated model output for storage lifecycle consistency, retention boundaries, and degraded-state honesty. Evidence should include issue and remediation evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Recommendation Grounding appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the recommendation grounding evidence for sitespeed storage manager integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-storage-40","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","storage","durability","degraded","recommendation-grounding","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/dashboard').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-storage check:40","humanCommand":"Verify storage/degraded transitions against sitespeed storageManagerTests concepts; review the recommendation-grounding evidence dimension for Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-storage-41","testId":"ni-sitespeed-storage-41","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Evidence Quality","description":"Validates evidence completeness, public safety, and reproducibility for storage lifecycle consistency, retention boundaries, and degraded-state honesty. Evidence should include test output and artifact evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Evidence Quality appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the evidence quality evidence for sitespeed storage manager integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-storage-41","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","storage","durability","degraded","evidence-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/dashboard').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-storage check:41","humanCommand":"Verify storage/degraded transitions against sitespeed storageManagerTests concepts; review the evidence-quality evidence dimension for Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-storage-42","testId":"ni-sitespeed-storage-42","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Threshold Policy","description":"Validates threshold clarity, pass/warn/fail semantics, and scoring transparency for storage lifecycle consistency, retention boundaries, and degraded-state honesty. Evidence should include threshold and result status evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Threshold Policy appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the threshold policy evidence for sitespeed storage manager integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-storage-42","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","storage","durability","degraded","threshold-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/dashboard').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-storage check:42","humanCommand":"Verify storage/degraded transitions against sitespeed storageManagerTests concepts; review the threshold-policy evidence dimension for Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-storage-43","testId":"ni-sitespeed-storage-43","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Confidence","description":"Validates confidence scoring and degraded-input disclosure for storage lifecycle consistency, retention boundaries, and degraded-state honesty. Evidence should include source freshness and input availability evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Confidence appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the confidence evidence for sitespeed storage manager integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-storage-43","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","storage","durability","degraded","confidence","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/dashboard').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-storage check:43","humanCommand":"Verify storage/degraded transitions against sitespeed storageManagerTests concepts; review the confidence evidence dimension for Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-storage-44","testId":"ni-sitespeed-storage-44","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Trend Readiness","description":"Validates historical comparability and timeline readiness for future reruns for storage lifecycle consistency, retention boundaries, and degraded-state honesty. Evidence should include analysis ID, timestamp, and persistence evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Trend Readiness appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the trend readiness evidence for sitespeed storage manager integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-storage-44","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","storage","durability","degraded","trend-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/dashboard').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-storage check:44","humanCommand":"Verify storage/degraded transitions against sitespeed storageManagerTests concepts; review the trend-readiness evidence dimension for Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-storage-45","testId":"ni-sitespeed-storage-45","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Ranking Readiness","description":"Validates ranking input completeness and profile compatibility for storage lifecycle consistency, retention boundaries, and degraded-state honesty. Evidence should include score and profile evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Ranking Readiness appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ranking readiness evidence for sitespeed storage manager integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-storage-45","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","storage","durability","degraded","ranking-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/dashboard').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-storage check:45","humanCommand":"Verify storage/degraded transitions against sitespeed storageManagerTests concepts; review the ranking-readiness evidence dimension for Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-storage-46","testId":"ni-sitespeed-storage-46","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Network Contribution","description":"Validates PlatPhorm network contribution through discovery, integrations, and standards compliance for storage lifecycle consistency, retention boundaries, and degraded-state honesty. Evidence should include network graph and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Network Contribution appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the network contribution evidence for sitespeed storage manager integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-storage-46","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","storage","durability","degraded","network-contribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/dashboard').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-storage check:46","humanCommand":"Verify storage/degraded transitions against sitespeed storageManagerTests concepts; review the network-contribution evidence dimension for Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-storage-47","testId":"ni-sitespeed-storage-47","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Report Readiness","description":"Validates report/export categorization with public-safe evidence and protected boundaries for storage lifecycle consistency, retention boundaries, and degraded-state honesty. Evidence should include report section mapping evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Report Readiness appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the report readiness evidence for sitespeed storage manager integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-storage-47","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","storage","durability","degraded","report-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/dashboard').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-storage check:47","humanCommand":"Verify storage/degraded transitions against sitespeed storageManagerTests concepts; review the report-readiness evidence dimension for Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-storage-48","testId":"ni-sitespeed-storage-48","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Operator Actionability","description":"Validates clear remediation, owner action, difficulty, and retest path for storage lifecycle consistency, retention boundaries, and degraded-state honesty. Evidence should include fix instructions and command evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Operator Actionability appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the operator actionability evidence for sitespeed storage manager integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-storage-48","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","storage","durability","degraded","operator-actionability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/dashboard').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-storage check:48","humanCommand":"Verify storage/degraded transitions against sitespeed storageManagerTests concepts; review the operator-actionability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-storage-49","testId":"ni-sitespeed-storage-49","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Degraded State","description":"Validates honest degraded, unavailable, skipped, and not-applicable states for storage lifecycle consistency, retention boundaries, and degraded-state honesty. Evidence should include status and storage evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Degraded State appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the degraded state evidence for sitespeed storage manager integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-storage-49","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","storage","durability","degraded","degraded-state","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/dashboard').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-storage check:49","humanCommand":"Verify storage/degraded transitions against sitespeed storageManagerTests concepts; review the degraded-state evidence dimension for Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-storage-50","testId":"ni-sitespeed-storage-50","suiteId":"security","suiteName":"Security","phase2Dimensions":["security","trust-privacy","traceability"],"name":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Reproducibility","description":"Validates stable CLI/API/human reproduction path and deterministic rerun instructions for storage lifecycle consistency, retention boundaries, and degraded-state honesty. Evidence should include commands and registry version evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"security-trust-privacy","reportSectionName":"Security, Trust, and Privacy","reportingCategory":"Security, Trust, and Privacy / Security","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity: Reproducibility appears in the Security, Trust, and Privacy report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the reproducibility evidence for sitespeed storage manager integrity, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-storage-50","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","storage","durability","degraded","reproducibility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"node -e \"fetch('https://example.com/api/v1/dashboard').then(r=>console.log(r.status))\" # group:sitespeed-storage check:50","humanCommand":"Verify storage/degraded transitions against sitespeed storageManagerTests concepts; review the reproducibility evidence dimension for Sitespeed Storage Manager Integrity"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-budget-01","testId":"ni-sitespeed-budget-01","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Availability","description":"Validates public route availability and successful bounded fetch behavior for performance budgets, threshold guardrails, and regression prevention quality. Evidence should include HTTP status, timeout, and redirect evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Availability appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the availability evidence for sitespeed budget enforcement, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-budget-01","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","budget","performance","regression","availability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --budgets-path=budget.json # group:sitespeed-budget check:1","humanCommand":"Validate budget regressions and enforcement using sitespeed budget patterns; review the availability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Budget Enforcement"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-budget-02","testId":"ni-sitespeed-budget-02","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Public Safety","description":"Validates public-safe access boundaries without exposing private or protected data for performance budgets, threshold guardrails, and regression prevention quality. Evidence should include route policy and response-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Public Safety appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the public safety evidence for sitespeed budget enforcement, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-budget-02","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","budget","performance","regression","public-safety","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --budgets-path=budget.json # group:sitespeed-budget check:2","humanCommand":"Validate budget regressions and enforcement using sitespeed budget patterns; review the public-safety evidence dimension for Sitespeed Budget Enforcement"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-budget-03","testId":"ni-sitespeed-budget-03","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Canonical Url","description":"Validates canonical URL stability and normalized route identity for performance budgets, threshold guardrails, and regression prevention quality. Evidence should include canonical tags, redirects, and normalized URL evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Canonical Url appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the canonical url evidence for sitespeed budget enforcement, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-budget-03","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","budget","performance","regression","canonical-url","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --budgets-path=budget.json # group:sitespeed-budget check:3","humanCommand":"Validate budget regressions and enforcement using sitespeed budget patterns; review the canonical-url evidence dimension for Sitespeed Budget Enforcement"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-budget-04","testId":"ni-sitespeed-budget-04","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Metadata Clarity","description":"Validates title, description, and page-specific metadata clarity for performance budgets, threshold guardrails, and regression prevention quality. Evidence should include HTML metadata and extracted text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Metadata Clarity appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the metadata clarity evidence for sitespeed budget enforcement, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-budget-04","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","budget","performance","regression","metadata-clarity","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --budgets-path=budget.json # group:sitespeed-budget check:4","humanCommand":"Validate budget regressions and enforcement using sitespeed budget patterns; review the metadata-clarity evidence dimension for Sitespeed Budget Enforcement"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-budget-05","testId":"ni-sitespeed-budget-05","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Semantic Structure","description":"Validates semantic HTML structure for humans, agents, and assistive technology for performance budgets, threshold guardrails, and regression prevention quality. Evidence should include heading, landmark, and element evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Semantic Structure appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the semantic structure evidence for sitespeed budget enforcement, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-budget-05","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","budget","performance","regression","semantic-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --budgets-path=budget.json # group:sitespeed-budget check:5","humanCommand":"Validate budget regressions and enforcement using sitespeed budget patterns; review the semantic-structure evidence dimension for Sitespeed Budget Enforcement"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-budget-06","testId":"ni-sitespeed-budget-06","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Machine Readability","description":"Validates machine-readable public content and predictable parsing surfaces for performance budgets, threshold guardrails, and regression prevention quality. Evidence should include structured tags, JSON-LD, and document-shape evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Machine Readability appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the machine readability evidence for sitespeed budget enforcement, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-budget-06","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","budget","performance","regression","machine-readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --budgets-path=budget.json # group:sitespeed-budget check:6","humanCommand":"Validate budget regressions and enforcement using sitespeed budget patterns; review the machine-readability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Budget Enforcement"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-budget-07","testId":"ni-sitespeed-budget-07","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Agent Discovery","description":"Validates agent discovery hints and AI-readable policy/documentation signals for performance budgets, threshold guardrails, and regression prevention quality. Evidence should include llms, policy, MCP, OpenAPI, or schema evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Agent Discovery appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the agent discovery evidence for sitespeed budget enforcement, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-budget-07","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","budget","performance","regression","agent-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --budgets-path=budget.json # group:sitespeed-budget check:7","humanCommand":"Validate budget regressions and enforcement using sitespeed budget patterns; review the agent-discovery evidence dimension for Sitespeed Budget Enforcement"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-budget-08","testId":"ni-sitespeed-budget-08","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Crawler Discovery","description":"Validates crawler discovery paths through robots, sitemap, feeds, and canonical links for performance budgets, threshold guardrails, and regression prevention quality. Evidence should include discovery artifact and link evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Crawler Discovery appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the crawler discovery evidence for sitespeed budget enforcement, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-budget-08","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","budget","performance","regression","crawler-discovery","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --budgets-path=budget.json # group:sitespeed-budget check:8","humanCommand":"Validate budget regressions and enforcement using sitespeed budget patterns; review the crawler-discovery evidence dimension for Sitespeed Budget Enforcement"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-budget-09","testId":"ni-sitespeed-budget-09","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Answerability","description":"Validates direct answer extraction and quotable explanatory content for performance budgets, threshold guardrails, and regression prevention quality. Evidence should include question, summary, heading, and paragraph evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Answerability appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the answerability evidence for sitespeed budget enforcement, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-budget-09","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","budget","performance","regression","answerability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --budgets-path=budget.json # group:sitespeed-budget check:9","humanCommand":"Validate budget regressions and enforcement using sitespeed budget patterns; review the answerability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Budget Enforcement"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-budget-10","testId":"ni-sitespeed-budget-10","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Generative Context","description":"Validates GEO context quality for generative engines without inventing measured facts for performance budgets, threshold guardrails, and regression prevention quality. Evidence should include entity, source, and instruction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Generative Context appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the generative context evidence for sitespeed budget enforcement, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-budget-10","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","budget","performance","regression","generative-context","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --budgets-path=budget.json # group:sitespeed-budget check:10","humanCommand":"Validate budget regressions and enforcement using sitespeed budget patterns; review the generative-context evidence dimension for Sitespeed Budget Enforcement"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-budget-11","testId":"ni-sitespeed-budget-11","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Search Intent","description":"Validates search intent alignment and snippet-friendly content structure for performance budgets, threshold guardrails, and regression prevention quality. Evidence should include metadata, headings, and topical text evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Search Intent appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the search intent evidence for sitespeed budget enforcement, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-budget-11","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","budget","performance","regression","search-intent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --budgets-path=budget.json # group:sitespeed-budget check:11","humanCommand":"Validate budget regressions and enforcement using sitespeed budget patterns; review the search-intent evidence dimension for Sitespeed Budget Enforcement"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-budget-12","testId":"ni-sitespeed-budget-12","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Accessibility Semantics","description":"Validates accessible names, relationships, landmarks, and keyboard-relevant structure for performance budgets, threshold guardrails, and regression prevention quality. Evidence should include ARIA, labels, landmarks, and control evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Accessibility Semantics appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the accessibility semantics evidence for sitespeed budget enforcement, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-budget-12","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","budget","performance","regression","accessibility-semantics","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --budgets-path=budget.json # group:sitespeed-budget check:12","humanCommand":"Validate budget regressions and enforcement using sitespeed budget patterns; review the accessibility-semantics evidence dimension for Sitespeed Budget Enforcement"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-budget-13","testId":"ni-sitespeed-budget-13","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Mobile Readiness","description":"Validates mobile viewport, responsive content, and touch-friendly layout signals for performance budgets, threshold guardrails, and regression prevention quality. Evidence should include viewport and responsive asset evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Mobile Readiness appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the mobile readiness evidence for sitespeed budget enforcement, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-budget-13","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","budget","performance","regression","mobile-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --budgets-path=budget.json # group:sitespeed-budget check:13","humanCommand":"Validate budget regressions and enforcement using sitespeed budget patterns; review the mobile-readiness evidence dimension for Sitespeed Budget Enforcement"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-budget-14","testId":"ni-sitespeed-budget-14","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Performance Budget","description":"Validates performance budget compliance using measured or bounded deterministic inputs for performance budgets, threshold guardrails, and regression prevention quality. Evidence should include timing, byte, and Lighthouse-derived evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Performance Budget appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the performance budget evidence for sitespeed budget enforcement, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-budget-14","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","budget","performance","regression","performance-budget","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --budgets-path=budget.json # group:sitespeed-budget check:14","humanCommand":"Validate budget regressions and enforcement using sitespeed budget patterns; review the performance-budget evidence dimension for Sitespeed Budget Enforcement"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-budget-15","testId":"ni-sitespeed-budget-15","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Resource Efficiency","description":"Validates resource size, script/style count, and optimization opportunity signals for performance budgets, threshold guardrails, and regression prevention quality. Evidence should include resource and markup evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Resource Efficiency appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the resource efficiency evidence for sitespeed budget enforcement, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-budget-15","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","budget","performance","regression","resource-efficiency","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --budgets-path=budget.json # group:sitespeed-budget check:15","humanCommand":"Validate budget regressions and enforcement using sitespeed budget patterns; review the resource-efficiency evidence dimension for Sitespeed Budget Enforcement"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-budget-16","testId":"ni-sitespeed-budget-16","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Cache Freshness","description":"Validates cache behavior, freshness hints, and stale-content risk for performance budgets, threshold guardrails, and regression prevention quality. Evidence should include HTTP cache and timestamp evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Cache Freshness appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the cache freshness evidence for sitespeed budget enforcement, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-budget-16","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","budget","performance","regression","cache-freshness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --budgets-path=budget.json # group:sitespeed-budget check:16","humanCommand":"Validate budget regressions and enforcement using sitespeed budget patterns; review the cache-freshness evidence dimension for Sitespeed Budget Enforcement"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-budget-17","testId":"ni-sitespeed-budget-17","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Route Reliability","description":"Validates route reliability, redirect safety, and dead-link risk for performance budgets, threshold guardrails, and regression prevention quality. Evidence should include status, redirect, and sitemap evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Route Reliability appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the route reliability evidence for sitespeed budget enforcement, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-budget-17","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","budget","performance","regression","route-reliability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --budgets-path=budget.json # group:sitespeed-budget check:17","humanCommand":"Validate budget regressions and enforcement using sitespeed budget patterns; review the route-reliability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Budget Enforcement"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-budget-18","testId":"ni-sitespeed-budget-18","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Feed Quality","description":"Validates RSS/Atom/feed usefulness, parseability, and freshness for performance budgets, threshold guardrails, and regression prevention quality. Evidence should include feed XML and item evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Feed Quality appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the feed quality evidence for sitespeed budget enforcement, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-budget-18","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","budget","performance","regression","feed-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --budgets-path=budget.json # group:sitespeed-budget check:18","humanCommand":"Validate budget regressions and enforcement using sitespeed budget patterns; review the feed-quality evidence dimension for Sitespeed Budget Enforcement"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-budget-19","testId":"ni-sitespeed-budget-19","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Sitemap Quality","description":"Validates sitemap validity, public-safe URL coverage, and no-dead-link policy for performance budgets, threshold guardrails, and regression prevention quality. Evidence should include sitemap XML and bounded link-check evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Sitemap Quality appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the sitemap quality evidence for sitespeed budget enforcement, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-budget-19","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","budget","performance","regression","sitemap-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --budgets-path=budget.json # group:sitespeed-budget check:19","humanCommand":"Validate budget regressions and enforcement using sitespeed budget patterns; review the sitemap-quality evidence dimension for Sitespeed Budget Enforcement"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-budget-20","testId":"ni-sitespeed-budget-20","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Robots Alignment","description":"Validates robots.txt alignment with public/protected policy and sitemap discovery for performance budgets, threshold guardrails, and regression prevention quality. Evidence should include robots directives and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Robots Alignment appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the robots alignment evidence for sitespeed budget enforcement, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-budget-20","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","budget","performance","regression","robots-alignment","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --budgets-path=budget.json # group:sitespeed-budget check:20","humanCommand":"Validate budget regressions and enforcement using sitespeed budget patterns; review the robots-alignment evidence dimension for Sitespeed Budget Enforcement"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-budget-21","testId":"ni-sitespeed-budget-21","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Llms Structure","description":"Validates llms.txt structure, readability, endpoint coverage, and agent usefulness for performance budgets, threshold guardrails, and regression prevention quality. Evidence should include plain-text section and line-length evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Llms Structure appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms structure evidence for sitespeed budget enforcement, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-budget-21","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","budget","performance","regression","llms-structure","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --budgets-path=budget.json # group:sitespeed-budget check:21","humanCommand":"Validate budget regressions and enforcement using sitespeed budget patterns; review the llms-structure evidence dimension for Sitespeed Budget Enforcement"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-budget-22","testId":"ni-sitespeed-budget-22","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Llms Index Schema","description":"Validates llms-index JSON schema shape and count reconciliation for performance budgets, threshold guardrails, and regression prevention quality. Evidence should include JSON keys, counts, and endpoint evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Llms Index Schema appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the llms index schema evidence for sitespeed budget enforcement, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-budget-22","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","budget","performance","regression","llms-index-schema","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --budgets-path=budget.json # group:sitespeed-budget check:22","humanCommand":"Validate budget regressions and enforcement using sitespeed budget patterns; review the llms-index-schema evidence dimension for Sitespeed Budget Enforcement"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-budget-23","testId":"ni-sitespeed-budget-23","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Humans Attribution","description":"Validates humans.txt attribution, maintainer, technology, and governance transparency for performance budgets, threshold guardrails, and regression prevention quality. Evidence should include humans.txt section evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Humans Attribution appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the humans attribution evidence for sitespeed budget enforcement, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-budget-23","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","budget","performance","regression","humans-attribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --budgets-path=budget.json # group:sitespeed-budget check:23","humanCommand":"Validate budget regressions and enforcement using sitespeed budget patterns; review the humans-attribution evidence dimension for Sitespeed Budget Enforcement"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-budget-24","testId":"ni-sitespeed-budget-24","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Agent Policy","description":"Validates agent-policy JSON clarity for allowed, disallowed, and protected operations for performance budgets, threshold guardrails, and regression prevention quality. Evidence should include well-known policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Agent Policy appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the agent policy evidence for sitespeed budget enforcement, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-budget-24","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","budget","performance","regression","agent-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --budgets-path=budget.json # group:sitespeed-budget check:24","humanCommand":"Validate budget regressions and enforcement using sitespeed budget patterns; review the agent-policy evidence dimension for Sitespeed Budget Enforcement"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-budget-25","testId":"ni-sitespeed-budget-25","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Ai Policy","description":"Validates AI policy clarity for training, search, answer use, caching, and attribution for performance budgets, threshold guardrails, and regression prevention quality. Evidence should include well-known AI policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Ai Policy appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ai policy evidence for sitespeed budget enforcement, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-budget-25","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","budget","performance","regression","ai-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --budgets-path=budget.json # group:sitespeed-budget check:25","humanCommand":"Validate budget regressions and enforcement using sitespeed budget patterns; review the ai-policy evidence dimension for Sitespeed Budget Enforcement"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-budget-26","testId":"ni-sitespeed-budget-26","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Trust Policy","description":"Validates trust policy coverage for privacy, traceability, metadata, and protected actions for performance budgets, threshold guardrails, and regression prevention quality. Evidence should include trust.json evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Trust Policy appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the trust policy evidence for sitespeed budget enforcement, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-budget-26","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","budget","performance","regression","trust-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --budgets-path=budget.json # group:sitespeed-budget check:26","humanCommand":"Validate budget regressions and enforcement using sitespeed budget patterns; review the trust-policy evidence dimension for Sitespeed Budget Enforcement"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-budget-27","testId":"ni-sitespeed-budget-27","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Openapi Contract","description":"Validates OpenAPI availability, server URL accuracy, schemas, and auth policy for performance budgets, threshold guardrails, and regression prevention quality. Evidence should include OpenAPI text/JSON evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Openapi Contract appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the openapi contract evidence for sitespeed budget enforcement, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-budget-27","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","budget","performance","regression","openapi-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --budgets-path=budget.json # group:sitespeed-budget check:27","humanCommand":"Validate budget regressions and enforcement using sitespeed budget patterns; review the openapi-contract evidence dimension for Sitespeed Budget Enforcement"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-budget-28","testId":"ni-sitespeed-budget-28","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Mcp Contract","description":"Validates MCP JSON-RPC introspection, real tools, resources, and protected boundaries for performance budgets, threshold guardrails, and regression prevention quality. Evidence should include MCP manifest and initialize evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Mcp Contract appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the mcp contract evidence for sitespeed budget enforcement, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-budget-28","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","budget","performance","regression","mcp-contract","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --budgets-path=budget.json # group:sitespeed-budget check:28","humanCommand":"Validate budget regressions and enforcement using sitespeed budget patterns; review the mcp-contract evidence dimension for Sitespeed Budget Enforcement"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-budget-29","testId":"ni-sitespeed-budget-29","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Api Error Shape","description":"Validates API success/error response shape consistency for performance budgets, threshold guardrails, and regression prevention quality. Evidence should include REST envelope evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Api Error Shape appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the api error shape evidence for sitespeed budget enforcement, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-budget-29","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","budget","performance","regression","api-error-shape","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --budgets-path=budget.json # group:sitespeed-budget check:29","humanCommand":"Validate budget regressions and enforcement using sitespeed budget patterns; review the api-error-shape evidence dimension for Sitespeed Budget Enforcement"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-budget-30","testId":"ni-sitespeed-budget-30","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Traceability","description":"Validates trace propagation, request IDs, and safe observability correlation for performance budgets, threshold guardrails, and regression prevention quality. Evidence should include trace header and metadata evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Traceability appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the traceability evidence for sitespeed budget enforcement, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-budget-30","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","budget","performance","regression","traceability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --budgets-path=budget.json # group:sitespeed-budget check:30","humanCommand":"Validate budget regressions and enforcement using sitespeed budget patterns; review the traceability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Budget Enforcement"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-budget-31","testId":"ni-sitespeed-budget-31","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Ja4 Redaction","description":"Validates fingerprint-adjacent metadata redaction and non-public raw JA4 handling for performance budgets, threshold guardrails, and regression prevention quality. Evidence should include metadata policy and redaction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Ja4 Redaction appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the ja4 redaction evidence for sitespeed budget enforcement, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-budget-31","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","budget","performance","regression","ja4-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --budgets-path=budget.json # group:sitespeed-budget check:31","humanCommand":"Validate budget regressions and enforcement using sitespeed budget patterns; review the ja4-redaction evidence dimension for Sitespeed Budget Enforcement"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-budget-32","testId":"ni-sitespeed-budget-32","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Secret Redaction","description":"Validates absence of secrets, generic key examples, cookies, and raw tokens in public outputs for performance budgets, threshold guardrails, and regression prevention quality. Evidence should include public artifact scan evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Secret Redaction appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the secret redaction evidence for sitespeed budget enforcement, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-budget-32","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","budget","performance","regression","secret-redaction","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --budgets-path=budget.json # group:sitespeed-budget check:32","humanCommand":"Validate budget regressions and enforcement using sitespeed budget patterns; review the secret-redaction evidence dimension for Sitespeed Budget Enforcement"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-budget-33","testId":"ni-sitespeed-budget-33","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Security Headers","description":"Validates security header coverage and hardened transport signals for performance budgets, threshold guardrails, and regression prevention quality. Evidence should include HTTP header evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Security Headers appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the security headers evidence for sitespeed budget enforcement, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-budget-33","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","budget","performance","regression","security-headers","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --budgets-path=budget.json # group:sitespeed-budget check:33","humanCommand":"Validate budget regressions and enforcement using sitespeed budget patterns; review the security-headers evidence dimension for Sitespeed Budget Enforcement"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-budget-34","testId":"ni-sitespeed-budget-34","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Privacy Consent","description":"Validates privacy policy, consent, attribution, and data-use disclosure quality for performance budgets, threshold guardrails, and regression prevention quality. Evidence should include public page and policy evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Privacy Consent appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the privacy consent evidence for sitespeed budget enforcement, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-budget-34","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","budget","performance","regression","privacy-consent","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --budgets-path=budget.json # group:sitespeed-budget check:34","humanCommand":"Validate budget regressions and enforcement using sitespeed budget patterns; review the privacy-consent evidence dimension for Sitespeed Budget Enforcement"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-budget-35","testId":"ni-sitespeed-budget-35","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Structured Data","description":"Validates JSON-LD and entity modeling for machine interpretation for performance budgets, threshold guardrails, and regression prevention quality. Evidence should include schema block and parse evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Structured Data appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the structured data evidence for sitespeed budget enforcement, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-budget-35","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","budget","performance","regression","structured-data","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --budgets-path=budget.json # group:sitespeed-budget check:35","humanCommand":"Validate budget regressions and enforcement using sitespeed budget patterns; review the structured-data evidence dimension for Sitespeed Budget Enforcement"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-budget-36","testId":"ni-sitespeed-budget-36","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Social Preview","description":"Validates Open Graph and Twitter/X card readiness for public sharing for performance budgets, threshold guardrails, and regression prevention quality. Evidence should include meta tag evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Social Preview appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the social preview evidence for sitespeed budget enforcement, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-budget-36","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","budget","performance","regression","social-preview","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --budgets-path=budget.json # group:sitespeed-budget check:36","humanCommand":"Validate budget regressions and enforcement using sitespeed budget patterns; review the social-preview evidence dimension for Sitespeed Budget Enforcement"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-budget-37","testId":"ni-sitespeed-budget-37","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: I18n Routing","description":"Validates locale route, hreflang, language declaration, and translation readiness for performance budgets, threshold guardrails, and regression prevention quality. Evidence should include lang/hreflang and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: I18n Routing appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the i18n routing evidence for sitespeed budget enforcement, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-budget-37","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","budget","performance","regression","i18n-routing","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --budgets-path=budget.json # group:sitespeed-budget check:37","humanCommand":"Validate budget regressions and enforcement using sitespeed budget patterns; review the i18n-routing evidence dimension for Sitespeed Budget Enforcement"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-budget-38","testId":"ni-sitespeed-budget-38","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Readability","description":"Validates human readability, sectioning, sentence complexity, and comprehension support for performance budgets, threshold guardrails, and regression prevention quality. Evidence should include extracted content evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Readability appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the readability evidence for sitespeed budget enforcement, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-budget-38","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","budget","performance","regression","readability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --budgets-path=budget.json # group:sitespeed-budget check:38","humanCommand":"Validate budget regressions and enforcement using sitespeed budget patterns; review the readability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Budget Enforcement"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-budget-39","testId":"ni-sitespeed-budget-39","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Content Utility","description":"Validates non-placeholder content usefulness and domain-specific public value for performance budgets, threshold guardrails, and regression prevention quality. Evidence should include content extraction evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Content Utility appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the content utility evidence for sitespeed budget enforcement, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-budget-39","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","budget","performance","regression","content-utility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --budgets-path=budget.json # group:sitespeed-budget check:39","humanCommand":"Validate budget regressions and enforcement using sitespeed budget patterns; review the content-utility evidence dimension for Sitespeed Budget Enforcement"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-budget-40","testId":"ni-sitespeed-budget-40","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Recommendation Grounding","description":"Validates recommendation grounding in deterministic evidence instead of fabricated model output for performance budgets, threshold guardrails, and regression prevention quality. Evidence should include issue and remediation evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Recommendation Grounding appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the recommendation grounding evidence for sitespeed budget enforcement, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-budget-40","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","budget","performance","regression","recommendation-grounding","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --budgets-path=budget.json # group:sitespeed-budget check:40","humanCommand":"Validate budget regressions and enforcement using sitespeed budget patterns; review the recommendation-grounding evidence dimension for Sitespeed Budget Enforcement"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-budget-41","testId":"ni-sitespeed-budget-41","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Evidence Quality","description":"Validates evidence completeness, public safety, and reproducibility for performance budgets, threshold guardrails, and regression prevention quality. Evidence should include test output and artifact evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Evidence Quality appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, critical severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":10,"severity":"critical","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the evidence quality evidence for sitespeed budget enforcement, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-budget-41","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","budget","performance","regression","evidence-quality","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --budgets-path=budget.json # group:sitespeed-budget check:41","humanCommand":"Validate budget regressions and enforcement using sitespeed budget patterns; review the evidence-quality evidence dimension for Sitespeed Budget Enforcement"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-budget-42","testId":"ni-sitespeed-budget-42","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Threshold Policy","description":"Validates threshold clarity, pass/warn/fail semantics, and scoring transparency for performance budgets, threshold guardrails, and regression prevention quality. Evidence should include threshold and result status evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Threshold Policy appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the threshold policy evidence for sitespeed budget enforcement, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-budget-42","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","budget","performance","regression","threshold-policy","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --budgets-path=budget.json # group:sitespeed-budget check:42","humanCommand":"Validate budget regressions and enforcement using sitespeed budget patterns; review the threshold-policy evidence dimension for Sitespeed Budget Enforcement"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-budget-43","testId":"ni-sitespeed-budget-43","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Confidence","description":"Validates confidence scoring and degraded-input disclosure for performance budgets, threshold guardrails, and regression prevention quality. Evidence should include source freshness and input availability evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Confidence appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the confidence evidence for sitespeed budget enforcement, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-budget-43","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","budget","performance","regression","confidence","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --budgets-path=budget.json # group:sitespeed-budget check:43","humanCommand":"Validate budget regressions and enforcement using sitespeed budget patterns; review the confidence evidence dimension for Sitespeed Budget Enforcement"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-budget-44","testId":"ni-sitespeed-budget-44","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Trend Readiness","description":"Validates historical comparability and timeline readiness for future reruns for performance budgets, threshold guardrails, and regression prevention quality. Evidence should include analysis ID, timestamp, and persistence evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Trend Readiness appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, serious severity, and high impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":8,"severity":"serious","impact":"high","remediation":"Improve the trend readiness evidence for sitespeed budget enforcement, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-budget-44","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","budget","performance","regression","trend-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --budgets-path=budget.json # group:sitespeed-budget check:44","humanCommand":"Validate budget regressions and enforcement using sitespeed budget patterns; review the trend-readiness evidence dimension for Sitespeed Budget Enforcement"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-budget-45","testId":"ni-sitespeed-budget-45","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Ranking Readiness","description":"Validates ranking input completeness and profile compatibility for performance budgets, threshold guardrails, and regression prevention quality. Evidence should include score and profile evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Ranking Readiness appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the ranking readiness evidence for sitespeed budget enforcement, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-budget-45","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","budget","performance","regression","ranking-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --budgets-path=budget.json # group:sitespeed-budget check:45","humanCommand":"Validate budget regressions and enforcement using sitespeed budget patterns; review the ranking-readiness evidence dimension for Sitespeed Budget Enforcement"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-budget-46","testId":"ni-sitespeed-budget-46","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Network Contribution","description":"Validates PlatPhorm network contribution through discovery, integrations, and standards compliance for performance budgets, threshold guardrails, and regression prevention quality. Evidence should include network graph and route evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Network Contribution appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the network contribution evidence for sitespeed budget enforcement, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-budget-46","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","budget","performance","regression","network-contribution","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --budgets-path=budget.json # group:sitespeed-budget check:46","humanCommand":"Validate budget regressions and enforcement using sitespeed budget patterns; review the network-contribution evidence dimension for Sitespeed Budget Enforcement"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-budget-47","testId":"ni-sitespeed-budget-47","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Report Readiness","description":"Validates report/export categorization with public-safe evidence and protected boundaries for performance budgets, threshold guardrails, and regression prevention quality. Evidence should include report section mapping evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Report Readiness appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, moderate severity, and medium impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":5,"severity":"moderate","impact":"medium","remediation":"Improve the report readiness evidence for sitespeed budget enforcement, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-budget-47","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","budget","performance","regression","report-readiness","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --budgets-path=budget.json # group:sitespeed-budget check:47","humanCommand":"Validate budget regressions and enforcement using sitespeed budget patterns; review the report-readiness evidence dimension for Sitespeed Budget Enforcement"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-budget-48","testId":"ni-sitespeed-budget-48","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Operator Actionability","description":"Validates clear remediation, owner action, difficulty, and retest path for performance budgets, threshold guardrails, and regression prevention quality. Evidence should include fix instructions and command evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Operator Actionability appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the operator actionability evidence for sitespeed budget enforcement, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-budget-48","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","budget","performance","regression","operator-actionability","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --budgets-path=budget.json # group:sitespeed-budget check:48","humanCommand":"Validate budget regressions and enforcement using sitespeed budget patterns; review the operator-actionability evidence dimension for Sitespeed Budget Enforcement"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-budget-49","testId":"ni-sitespeed-budget-49","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Degraded State","description":"Validates honest degraded, unavailable, skipped, and not-applicable states for performance budgets, threshold guardrails, and regression prevention quality. Evidence should include status and storage evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Degraded State appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the degraded state evidence for sitespeed budget enforcement, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-budget-49","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","budget","performance","regression","degraded-state","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --budgets-path=budget.json # group:sitespeed-budget check:49","humanCommand":"Validate budget regressions and enforcement using sitespeed budget patterns; review the degraded-state evidence dimension for Sitespeed Budget Enforcement"}},{"id":"ni-sitespeed-budget-50","testId":"ni-sitespeed-budget-50","suiteId":"performance","suiteName":"Performance","phase2Dimensions":["performance","core-web-vitals","mobile-responsive","carbon-sustainability"],"name":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Reproducibility","description":"Validates stable CLI/API/human reproduction path and deterministic rerun instructions for performance budgets, threshold guardrails, and regression prevention quality. Evidence should include commands and registry version evidence; unavailable evidence must be reported as degraded, skipped, unavailable, or not applicable rather than fabricated.","checkType":"deterministic","reportSectionId":"performance-cwv","reportSectionName":"Performance and Core Web Vitals","reportingCategory":"Performance and Core Web Vitals / Performance","evidenceType":"deterministic","publicReadout":"Sitespeed Budget Enforcement: Reproducibility appears in the Performance and Core Web Vitals report section with deterministic evidence, minor severity, and low impact.","inputRequirements":["Public-safe URL","Fetched public response or measured provider output","Threshold: pass 85 score"],"outputSchema":{"status":["pass","warn","fail","skipped","degraded","unavailable","not_applicable"],"score":"number 0-100","evidence":"public-safe structured evidence","remediation":"deterministic remediation guidance"},"weight":3,"severity":"minor","impact":"low","remediation":"Improve the reproducibility evidence for sitespeed budget enforcement, publish public-safe proof, and re-run this registry test to confirm deterministic improvement.","traceSpanName":"insights.test.ni-sitespeed-budget-50","registryVersion":"insights-quality-2026-05-10.2","tags":["sitespeed","budget","performance","regression","reproducibility","new-internet","analysis","ranking"],"reproducibility":{"cliCommand":"npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=performance --budgets-path=budget.json # group:sitespeed-budget check:50","humanCommand":"Validate budget regressions and enforcement using sitespeed budget patterns; review the reproducibility evidence dimension for Sitespeed Budget Enforcement"}}]}}